The URL can be used to link to this page

2020-02-11 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 1. Opening meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments TUESDAY, Feb 11, 2020 - 7:00 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff, recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence. Separate introduction or further support from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for this purpose is not required or appropriate. 4. *Consent Agenda Page *A. Approve payment of claims 258-275 *B. Approve minutes: January 28, 2020 276-284 *C. Approve 1-4 Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for Our Lady of the Lake 285 Keg & Cork Fundraiser on March 7, 2020 *D. Approve Resolution to Approve Waiver of Platting for 286-321 1754 Shorewood Lane 288 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Orono Police Sgt. Kenny Beck presenting the Mound Activity Report for January 322 - 332 7. Approve Resolution Accepting Bid for 2019 Street & Utility Project —Sherwood 333-334 Drive City Project No. PW 19-01 to Kusske Construction in the amount 334 of $254,480.00. 8. City Manager Eric Hoversten requesting discussion and direction on next steps 335-336 in the Mound Harbor District Request for Qualification and Interest process 9. Council Member Sherrie Pugh with an update on the 2020 Census ----- PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 10. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/Reports from Council members B. Reports: Fire Department — December 2019 337-338 Liquor Store —January 2020 339 C. Minutes: Planning Commission —January 7, 2020 340-347 D. Correspondence: 11. Adjourn COUNCIL BRIEFING February 11, 2020 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! 18 February - 7:00 PM — Combined Special Meeting Workshop Council and Planning Commission 25 Feb — Precinct Caucuses 26 February - 6:55 PM — 25 Feb HRA Regular Meeting RESCHEDULED (as may be required) 26 February - 7:00 PM — 25 Feb City Council Regular Meeting RESCHEDULED 10 February — 13 February 3:00 PM - Harbor Wine & Spirits Closed for Remodeling 29February—Harbor Wine & Spirits GrandRe-openingCelebration 3 March — Presidential Nominating Primary 10 March - 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 10 March - 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting (Respectful Workplace Training Workshop to follow) 20 — 29 March — Westonka Schools Spring Break 24 March - 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 24 March - 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting 14 April - 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 14 April - 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting 21 April - 6:30 PM — City Council Special Meeting Workshop, Departmental Annual Reports 28 April - 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 28 April - 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting City Offices Closed February 17, 2020 — Presidents' Day City Official's Absences Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Inauire in advance. please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision- making. City of Mound Claims 02-11-20 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2019 2019CITYAP14 $ 15.00 2019 2019CITYAP15 $ 13,667.41 2020 1STQTR20N EWS $ 11065.77 2020 DVSRENEW20 $ 596.75 2020 02072OCTYMAN $ 516.00 2020 021120CITY $ 9421436.92 2020 021120HWS $ 80,117.72 TOTAL CLAIMS 11 $ 1,038,415.57 -258- CITY OF MOUND 01/29/20 2:00 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: Closing 2019 Batch Name 2019CITYAP14 User Dollar Amt $15.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $15.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 286 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC _ AP Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 12-31-19 EDITION Invoice S0706414 12/32019 Transaction Date 1282020 Due 12/312019 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $15.00 $15.00 Refer 285 VERIZON WIRELESS _ AP Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 11-14-19 THRU 12- $15.98 13-19- CX Invoice 12312019 12/312019 AP Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 11-14-19 THRU 12- -$55.96 13-19- CX Invoice 12312019 12/312019 AP Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 11-14-19 THRU 12- -$15.98 13-19- CX Invoice 12312019 12/312019 AP Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 11-14-19 THRU 12- $55.96 13-19- CX Invoice 12312019 12/312019 Transaction Date 1282020 Due 12/312019 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $0.00 Fund Summary 20200 Accounts Payable 101 GENERAL FUND $0.00 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $15.00 $15.00 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $15.00 Total $15.00 -259- Batch Name 2019CITYAP15 Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: Closing 2019 User Dollar Amt $13,667.41 Computer Dollar Amt $13,667.41 $0.00 In Balance Refer 319 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM. COMM _ AP Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs 4TH QTR 2019 PEG ACCESS FEE PER SUBSCRIBER Invoice 042418 4/112018 Transaction Date 2/62020 Due 12/312019 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 307 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _ AP Payment E 101-42400-202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE/P &I COPIER B & WHT COPIES 10-20-19 THRU 1- Invoice 191264 1272020 19-20 Invoice 3333890 1222020 DEC 2019 -CIS DATA HOSTING, AP Payment E 101-41500-202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE/P &I Invoice 191264 1272020 COPIER B & WHT COPIES 10-20-19 THRU 1- AP Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage 19-20 Invoice 3333890 1222020 AP Payment E 101-42400-202 Duplicating and copying PRINTER HP4100 P&I COPIER B & WHT Invoice 191264 1272020 COPIES 10-20-19 THRU 1-19-20 Invoice 3333890 1222020 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Transaction Date 2/62019 Due 12/312019 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 327 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS, LLC AP Payment E 601-49400-307 Admin/Finance/Compute DEC 2019 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 191264 1272020 AP Payment E 602-49450-307 Admin/Finance/Compute DEC 2019 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 191264 1272020 AP Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage DEC 2019- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE Invoice 191264 1272020 AP Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage DEC 2019- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE Invoice 191264 1272020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Due 12/312019 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 306 ORONO, CITY OF AP Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners Invoice 20141535 1242019 HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM FEES DECEMBER 2019 Transaction Date 2/62020 Due 12/31/2019 Accounts Payable 20200 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 20200 Accounts Payable $9,405.39 $2,131.01 $2,131.01 $13,667.41 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $13,667.41 Total $13,667.41 -260- Total 02/06/20 1:14 PM Page 1 $8,759.24 $8,759.24 $49.49 $49.50 $25.16 $124.15 $1,808.81 $1,808.81 $322.20 $322.20 $4,262.02 $522.00 $522.00 Batch Name 1stgtr20NEWS Payments Refer 305 POSTMASTER Cash Payment E 101-41110-322 Postage Invoice 02012020 1/302020 Transaction Date 1292020 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: January 2020 User Dollar Amt $1,065.77 Computer Dollar Amt $1,065.77 $0.00 In Balance POSTAGE CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER - FEB, MARCH, APRIL 2020 EDITION Wells Fargo 10100 Total 10100 Wells Fargo $1,065.77 $1,065.77 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $1,065.77 Total $1,065.77 - 261 - 01/29/20 5:05 PM Page 1 $1,065.77 $1,065.77 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: January 2020 Batch Name DVSRENEW20 User Dollar Amt $596.75 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $596.75 $0.00 In Balance Refer 304 DRIVER AND VEHICLE SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-45200-438 Licenses and Taxes DVS RENEWAL PARKS DEPT #110- 2010 FELLING TRAILER, #114 2015 FELLING TRAILER, #705- 2005 BB UTILITY TRAILER, #307- 2007 FELLING TRAILER Invoice 02292020 1292020 Cash Payment E 101-45200-438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 02292020 1292020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 02292020 1292020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 02292020 1292020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 02292020 1292020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 02292020 1292020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 02292020 1292020 Transaction Date 1292020 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND DVS RENEWAL PARKS DEPT #219 2019 FORD F550, #416- 2016 FORD F350, #415- 2015 FORD F150, #317- 2017 FORD F350, #319-2019 FORD F550 DVS RENEWAL WATER DEPT #109 2009 FORD F450, #316- 2016 FORD F150, #315- 2014 FORD F150, #512- 2013 FORD F350 DVS RENEWAL SEWER DEPT #214 2014 VACUUM TRUCK, #217 2017 FORD F450, #609- 2009 UTILITY TRAILER -TRENCH BOX, #1604- 2004 STERLING DUMP TRUCK, #409- 2009 GENERATOR TRAILER, #509- 2009 GENERATOR TRAILER, DVS RENEWAL STREETS DEPT #104- 2004 UTILITY TRAILER, #118 WYLIE TANK TRAILER, #304 2004 VACUUM SWEEPER, #504- 2004 BUCKET TRUCK, DVS RENEWAL STREETS DEPT #119 2019 FORD F550, #515- 2015 FORD F550, #218 2018 FORD F550, #318- 2018 FORD F550, DVS RENEWAL STREETS DEPT #312 2012 FREIGHTLINER, #314- 2015 FREIGHTLINER PLOW TRUCK, #313 2014 FREIGHTLINER, #412- 2013 FREIGHTLINER Wells Fargo 10100 10100 Wells Fargo $404.25 $77.00 $115.50 $596.75 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $596.75 Total $596.75 -262- Total 01/29/20 2:03 PM Page 1 $77.00 $96.25 $77.00 $115.50 $77.00 $77.00 $77.00 $596.75 Batch Name 02072OCTYMAN Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2020 User Dollar Amt $516.00 Computer Dollar Amt $516.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 315 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING & HEATI _ Cash Payment R 101-42000-32230 Plumbing Connection REFUND 80% OF PERMIT FEE BP#2019- 00925- PLUMBING PERMIT CANCELLED - SPEEDWAY Invoice 2019-00925 10282019 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 318 KULLBERG, CRAIG _ Cash Payment R 101-45000-34940 Cemetery Lot Sale REFUND PURCHASE OF GRAVE C-151-2- C. KULLBERG Invoice 020620 1292020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 320 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM OPERATOR EXAM APP FEE- M. RADDE Invoice 0201120 1272020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM OPERATOR EXAM APP FEE- R. PRICH Invoice 0201120 1272020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $452.00 $64.00 $516.00 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $516.00 Total $516.00 -263- 02/06/20 3:05 PM Page 1 $52.00 $52.00 $400.00 $400.00 $32.00 $32.00 $64.00 CITY OF MOUND 02/06/20 3:04 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: February 2020 Batch Name 021120CITY User Dollar Amt $942,436.92 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $942,436.92 $0.00 In Balance Refer 308ABDO EICKAND MEYERS, LLP _ Cash Payment E 101-41500-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $1,918.83 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Cash Payment E 222-42260-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $1,298.89 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Cash Payment E 281-45210-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $295.20 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Cash Payment E 285-46388-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $236.16 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $929.89 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $929.89 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $1,918.82 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Cash Payment E 670-49500-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $236.16 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Cash Payment E 675-49425-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $236.16 31-2019 Invoice 424125 1/312020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,000.00 Refer 309 AMERICAN MESSAGING _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi OWNED NUMERIC UNLIMITED PAGING $30.22 MESSAGING SVC -02/0120 TO 01/312021 LY 2019- PARKS & PUB WKS Invoice D2062026UB 2/12020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi OWNED NUMERIC UNLIMITED PAGING $30.22 MESSAGING SVC -02/0120 TO 01/312021 LY 2019- PARKS & PUB WKS Invoice D2062026UB 2/12020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi OWNED NUMERIC UNLIMITED PAGING $30.22 MESSAGING SVC -02/0120 TO 01/312021 LY 2019- PARKS & PUB WKS Invoice D2062026UB 2/12020 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi OWNED NUMERIC UNLIMITED PAGING $30.22 MESSAGING SVC -02/0120 TO 01/312021 LY 2019- PARKS & PUB WKS Invoice D2062026UB 2/12020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.88 Refer 310 ASPEN EQUIPMENT _ -264- CITY OF MOUND 02/06/20 3:04 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: February 2020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs AUGER/CONVEYOR- STREETS TRUCKS $534.43 Invoice 10214053 1242020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $534.43 Refer 311 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL $34.11 5808 GRANDVIEW BLVD LS GENERATOR $34.13 GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 1717 BAYWOOD SHORES DR. LS $36.56 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR $34.13 GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 4728 CARLOW RD LS GENERATOR NATL $26.05 GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 1871 COMMERCE BLVD NEW LIFT STATION $27.89 GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR $32.88 NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 5808 GRANDVIEW BLVD LS GENERATOR $34.13 NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR $34.13 NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 5260 LYNWOOD BLVD. LS GENERATOR $25.42 NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 4791 NORTHERN RD LS D1 GENERATOR $32.88 NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 1972 SHOREWOOD LN LS GENERATOR $27.26 NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 3172 SINCLAIR RD LS GENERATOR NATL $39.07 GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 1758 SUMACH LANE LS GENERATOR NATL $26.00 GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 4922 THREE PTS BLVD LS GENERATOR $32.24 NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 12-20-19 $26.05 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 5077 WINDSOR RD LS GENERATOR NATL $27.26 GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 4783 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE LS GENERATOR $38.63 NATL GAS SVC 12-20-19 THRU 1-20-20 Invoice -265- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Refer 312 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 00069514 1/312020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 00069514 1/312020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Refer 314 CERTAPRO PAINTERS OF MTKA Cash Payment E 609-49750-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 02112020 1232020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Refer 313 CORE & MAIN LP 02/06/20 3:04 PM Page 3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.56 HIGH PRESSURE MEDIUM CYLINDER RENTALS- QTY 9 Project 20-3 HIGH PRESSURE ACETYLENE MEDIUM CYLINDER RENTALS- QTY 5 Project 20-3 Vells Fargo 10100 Total PAINT & PREP INTERIOR OF LIQUOR STORE, WALL PAPER REMOVAL & SKIM COAT- HWS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26.04 $8.68 $34.72 $3,809.00 $3.809.00 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER METER REPAIR SENSUS $78.00 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 COMMAND LINK E 609-49750-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi Invoice L819629 1232020 1/302020 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER METER BALL CURB STOP- QTY 15 $838.65 Invoice L798058 1202020 PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies IPERL WATER METERS & BALL CURB, $3,822.08 COUPLING- QTY 16 Invoice L796079 1202020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER METER REPAIR CLAMPS- 7 QTY $827.94 Invoice L839250 1282020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER METER SENSUS COMMAND LINK $531.79 CHARGERS- QTY 4 Invoice L749057 1222020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER METERS- 27 QTY DUAL PORT, $4,215.53 WIRED W READ & LEAK DETECT Invoice L839239 1282020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,313.99 Refer 316 FRONTIERICITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NETWORK ETHERNET SVC 1-20-20 THRU 2- $150.00 20-20 Invoice 021120 1222020 Cash Payment E 101-41920-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NETWORK ETHERNET SVC 1-20-20 THRU 2- $175.00 20-20 Invoice 021120 1222020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $325.00 Refer 317 FRONTIERICITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 -266- $46.25 $212.35 $190.78 $185.17 CITY OF MOUND 02/06/20 3:04 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: February 2020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 $185.17 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Cash Payment E 101-41930-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 $453.26 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 $151.09 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 $75.55 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -1-30-20- TO 2-29-20 $75.55 Invoice 021120-2 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,575.17 Refer 319 LUBE -TECH & PARTNERS, LLC Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic USED BULK OIL PICK UP- PUB WKS SHOP $100.00 01-23-20 Invoice 1538670 1232020 Project 20-3 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 Refer 322 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies COY PAPER, STAPLER, INK CARTRIDGES, $158.08 THERMAL LAMINATING POUCHES, I PK MARKERS, BOARD CLEANER, PENS, FOLDERS 3 UP- 100- FIRE DEPT Invoice 433089359001 1232020 PO 24987 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $158.08 Refer 321 OFFICE DEPOT _ Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER- 3 CASES, HIGHLIGHTERS, $120.76 BINDER CLIPS, STAPLES- CITY HALL Invoice 433769922001 1242020 PO 25155 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies NAME PLATES- S. PILLING, J. CIATTI - NEW $25.98 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Invoice 427577437001 1222020 PO 25153 Cash Payment E 101-41410-200 Office Supplies DYMO LABELS, BLUE PAINTERS TAPE, CUP $26.29 STYLE PEN HOLDER- ELECTIONS Invoice 433769922001 1242020 PO 25155 Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies CITY OF MOUND MAILING STICK ON LABELS $149.50 Invoice 427577437001 1242020 PO 25153 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $322.53 Refer 324 ORONO, CITY OF _ Cash Payment E 101-42110-440 Other Contractual Servic 1ST HALF 2020 CONTRACTED POLICE $911,464.00 SERVICE Invoice 20141534 1242020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $911,464.00 Refer 323 R.C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maintenance LED RETROFIT- HWS- LABOR, MATERIALS, $4,875.00 PERMIT Invoice 7015 2/42020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maintenance LED RETROFIT- HWS-- UTILITY REBATE -$1,904.57 FROM XCEL Invoice 7015 2/42020 -267- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic CHECK GROUND WIRE FROM SERVICE 5993 BARTLETT BLVD- XCEL ENERGY PROBLEM Invoice 6983 1/132020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 325 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS COR _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials COLD MIX -WINTER, BULK 7.41 ONS DELIVERED 1-23-20 Invoice 49823 1232020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 02/06/20 3:04 PM Page 5 $160.00 $3,130.43 $1,000.35 Total $1,000.35 Refer 326 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY _ Cash Payment E 101-41930-220 Repair/Maint Supply 18 QTY G12 70W CERAMIC BULBS- CITY $972.18 HALL Invoice S003238419.004 1/172020 Cash Payment E 101-41930-220 Repair/Maint Supply 30 QTY 28W 48" T8 BIPIN 3500K SUPER $75.60 SAVER BULBS- CITY HALL Invoice S003343786.001 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,047.78 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $917,312.89 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $1,758.06 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $295.20 285 HRA/HARBOR DISTRICT $236.16 601 WATER FUND $11,619.27 602 SEWER FUND $1,832.42 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $8,910.60 670 RECYCLING FUND $236.16 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $236.16 $942,436.92 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $942,436.92 Total $942,436.92 CITY OF MOUND 02/06/203:01 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: February 2020 Batch Name 021120HWS User Dollar Amt $80,117.72 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $80,117.72 $0.00 In Balance Refer 396 56 BREWING, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $140.00 Invoice 5608940 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $140.00 Refer 368 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $628.80 Invoice 3400903 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$76.59 Invoice 482077 1/142020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $672.20 Invoice 3402347 1/312020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,224.41 Refer 369 BALD MAN BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $337.90 Invoice 4025 1232020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $337.90 Refer 371 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,469.13 Invoice 0082628400 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $17.05 Invoice 0082628400 1292020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,486.18 Refer 370 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $31.50 Invoice 0100826700 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- 26 QT COOLER $49.00 Invoice 0100826700 1292020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.50 Refer 397 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $189.00 Invoice 0082726100 2/52020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $1.55 Invoice 0082726100 2/52020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $190.55 Refer 398 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES- BAGS, DUM DUM POPS- HWS $180.59 Invoice 0100859100 2/52020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.59 Refer 399 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $96.00 Invoice 0082720700 2/52020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,162.15 Invoice 0082720700 2/52020 -269- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2020 02/06/20 3:01 PM Page 2 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $46.50 Invoice 0082720700 2/52020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,304.65 Refer 372 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $72.00 Invoice 1091109484 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,665.55 Invoice 1091109483 1292020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,737.55 Refer 400 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $73.60 Invoice 1091112246 2/52020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,947.15 Invoice 1091112245 2/52020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,020.75 Refer 374 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $855.24 Invoice 1081092875 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,246.38 Invoice 1081092874 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $526.20 Invoice 1081094568 1/312020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,627.82 Refer 373 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,802.00 Invoice 1081096255 2/52020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,673.40 Invoice 1081096254 2/52020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MIX $48.00 Invoice 1081096256 2/52020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,523.40 Refer 375 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $89.00 Invoice 7115417 1242020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $164.00 Invoice 2375870 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,447.72 Invoice 7115429 1282020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,700.72 Refer 401 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,265.15 Invoice 7115462 2/42020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$190.55 Invoice 1044-00042 2/42020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $90.00 Invoice 7115442 1/312020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,164.60 -270- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2020 02/06/20 3:01 PM Page 3 Refer 376 COCA COLA BOTTLING -MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $372.52 Invoice 3609209605 1272020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $372.52 Refer 402 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,442.90 Invoice 123-04046 2/42020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,442.90 Refer 377 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $702.00 Invoice 187912 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $56.25 Invoice 187913 1232020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $758.25 Refer 403 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,266.70 Invoice 189084 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,266.70 Refer 378 INBOUND BREWCO _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $495.90 Invoice 6124 1282020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $495.90 Refer 379 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $171.40 Invoice 3059444 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,570.25 Invoice 3059445 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,693.10 Invoice 3059475 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,434.75 Refer 380 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,138.53 Invoice 3059495 2/62020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $50.90 Invoice 3059496 2/62020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,189.43 Refer 381 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $42.95 Invoice 1491757 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,103.25 Invoice 1491755 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,439.53 Invoice 1491756 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $37.00 Invoice 1497058 2/52020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $768.60 Invoice 1497056 2/52020 - 271 - CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1497057 2/52020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1494653 2/32020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 02/06/20 3:01 PM Page 4 $7,882.94 $426.60 Total $14,700.87 Refer 404 LO VEGREEN INDUSTRIAL SER VIC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic CONVEYOR BELT INSPECTION / REPAIR- $850.93 HWS Invoice 131072 1292020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $850.93 Refer 382 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $230.00 Invoice 26668 1232020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.00 Refer 405 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $576.00 Invoice 24930 1282020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $576.00 Refer 383 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 01-02-20 $334.95 Invoice 35931 1/22020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 01-09-20 $179.80 Invoice 35946 1/92020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 01-16-20 $452.40 Invoice 35962 1/162020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 01-23-20 $371.20 Invoice 35980 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 01-30-20 $189.95 Invoice 36000 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,528.30 Refer 384 MAVERICK WINE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $403.98 Invoice 405558 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $3.00 Invoice 405558 1232020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $406.98 Refer 406 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MICE. INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 1-06-20- $65.19 HWS Invoice 180149745 1262020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $65.19 Refer 385 MODIST BREWING CO. LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $164.00 Invoice 11362 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$100.33 Invoice 11362 1292020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $63.67 -272- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2020 Refer 407 MOUND, CITY OF Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities Invoice 021120 1202020 Transaction Date 2/62020 WATER SERVICE 11-26-19 THRU 1-2-20 HWS Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 386 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 78848 1272020 WINE Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 78848 1272020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 409 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 79481 2/32020 WINE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R FREIGHT Invoice 79481 2/32020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Total 02/06/20 3:01 PM Page 5 $65.31 $65.31 $327.00 $7.00 $334.00 $346.01 $7.00 $353.01 Refer 388 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $698.25 Invoice 2700018 2/52020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $111.65 Invoice 2700017 2/52020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $809.90 Refer 387 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $315.64 Invoice 2696282 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $378.00 Invoice 2696283 1292020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $693.64 Refer 390 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $80.00 Invoice 1921311 2/62020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $991.08 Invoice 1921308 2/62020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $456.00 Invoice 1921309 2/62020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,527.08 Refer 389 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $36.00 Invoice 1918739 1/302020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,338.71 Invoice 1918740 1/302020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $708.00 Invoice 1918737 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,082.71 Refer 391 ST. CLOUD REFRIGERATION, INC -273- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maintenance HVAC PREV MTCE INSPECTIONS - COOLERS, CONDENSERS HWS Invoice 51275 1/162020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 392 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0250486 1232020 Invoice 0250824 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0250486 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0250485 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0250485 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 0250487 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0250487 1232020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo Refer 393 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 0250824 1/302020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 0250824 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Refer 394 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 133168 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 133168 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 133863 1/302020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 133863 1/302020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 133169 1232020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 133169 1232020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Refer 395 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 7272091 1292020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 7273115 2/52020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Refer 410 WINEBOW 10100 Total Total 02/06/20 3:01 PM Page 6 $403.99 $403.99 $1,485.46 $22.50 $648.00 $9.00 $120.00 $12.00 $2,296.96 LIQUOR $169.21 FREIGHT $5.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $174.21 WINE $888.00 FREIGHT $13.20 WINE $112.00 FREIGHT $4.20 LIQUOR $98.00 FREIGHT $5.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,120.40 WINE $244.00 WINE $588.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 00073888 1/302020 -274- $832.00 $318.00 CITY OF MOUND 02/06/203:01 PM Page 7 Payments Current Period: February 2020 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 00073888 1/302020 Transaction Date 2/62020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $322.50 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $80,117.72 $80,117.72 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $80,117.72 Total $80,117.72 -275- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES January 28, 2020 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Ray Salazar; Council members Phil Velsor, Jeff Bergquist, Paula Larson, and Sherrie Pugh Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Eric Hoversten, Fin Dir/Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Field Officer Andy Drilling, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, Building Official Scott Qualle, Trever Martinez, Maureen Michaelski, Erik Peterson, Samuel Johnson, Morgaine Johnson, Jeff Stedman, Merrick Morgan Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Salazar called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledae of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda Hoversten noted additional pages for Item 12, pages 244.1 — 244.15. MOTION by Larson, seconded by Velsor, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Bergquist, seconded by Pugh, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $354,137.55. B. Approve minutes: 1-14-20 regular meeting. C. RESOLUTION NO. 20-13: RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR CDBG FUNDING OF SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES D. Approve Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement E. Approve rescheduling of February 25, 2020 regular council meeting to Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 7:00 pm due to precinct caucuses -276- Mound City Council Minutes — January 28, 2020 F. RESOLUTION NO. 20-14: RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTIO JUDGES AS RECOMMEDED FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION PRIMARY ELECTION ON MARCH 3, 2020 G. RESOLUTION NO. 20-15: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT AND MUSICAL CONCERT PERMITS FOR RIVER VALLEY CHURCH PICNIC TO BE HELD ON JUNE 14, 2020 AT SURFSIDE PARK AND BEACH H. Approve 1-4 Day Temporary Liquor License for the Northwest Tonka Lions Gillespie Center Pasta Dinner Fundraiser on Saturday, Feb. 29" Approve rescheduling 01-28-20 special meeting workshop to Tuesday, March 10, 2020 immediately following regular Council meeting for Respectful Workplace Behavior Training 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None were offered. 6. Planning Commission Recommendation Public Hearing - consideration/action on ordinance amending Chapter 129 to prohibit exterior storage on undeveloped lots and new regulations regarding ice shelters Smith said she will provide the overview of proposed changes to Chapter 129 and Field Officer Andy Drilling will present the other items. Smith said the first action is to address exterior storage on undeveloped lots and ice shelter storage and noted this is a topic that has been discussed previously in conjunction with broader conversations on exterior storage and that this is considered somewhat of a baby step to tightening requirements. Smith said zoning amendments require a public hearing and that existing code is 1 storage unit per 3,000 square feet, and the recommendation of the Planning Commission is to eliminate any storage units on undeveloped lots unless they are adjacent to a developed lot that is tax combined to create one PID. Smith said the ice shelter structures seem to be increasing in use and this is an attempt to address them specifically. Velsor asked if the vacant lot can be across the street and Smith said she did not think so for the PIDs to be combined. Mayor Salazar opened the public hearing at 7:09 pm and upon receiving no comment, closed the public hearing. Requested Action: Approve Ordinance No. 01-2020 Amending Chapter 129 (Zoning) of the Mound City Code Regarding Exterior Storage on Undeveloped Lots and Ice Shelters MOTION by Larson, seconded by Pugh, to adopt the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. -277- Mound City Council Minutes — January 28, 2020 ORDINANCE NO. 01-2020: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 129 (ZONING) OF THE MOUND CITY CODE REGARDING EXTERIOR STORAGE ON UNDEVELOPED LOTS AND ICE SHELTERS 7. Consideration/action on ordinance amending Chapter 42 of the Mound Citv Code regarding public nuisances affecting peace and safety Field Officer Andy Drilling said Staff is looking to strengthen the definition of the word 'junk' and to link it to the definition in the zoning code and nuisance language. Larson said she still thinks the language is vague. Drilling said the vehicles may or may not be licensed, but it also addresses furniture and construction material. Larson said people's interpretation may differ and asked what if they have a tarp over the junk. Drilling said it would depend on the condition of the items, but noted the City can't write code for 'taste.' Larson said as a complaint -based city, enforcement would depend on neighbor complaining. Drilling agreed and said they try not to be heavy handed but rather work with the property owner. Larson noted two calls in the fall regarding leaves being blown in the street. Drilling said that is covered under the next item. Requested Action: Approve Ordinance No. 02-2020 Amending Chapter 42 (Nuisances) of the Mound City Code Regarding Public Nuisances Affecting Peace and Safety MOTION by Bergquist, seconded by Velsor, to adopt the following ordinance. The following voted in favor: Salazar, Bergquist, Velsor, Pugh. The following voted against: Larson. The following abstained: None. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 02-2020: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 42 (NUISANCES) OF THE MOUND CITY CODE REGARDING PUBLIC NUISANCES AFFECTING PEACE AND SAFETY 8. Consideration/action on ordinance amending City Code Chapter 46 of the Mound City Code related to detached trailer parking, disorderly property and littering Drilling said this will fall under the jurisdiction of the complaints -based system and it is just considered another tool if the owner is not cooperating. Drilling said if the neighbors are OK with it, it won't be an issue, but there are instances where people who don't have storage space are storing their detached trailer on the street all summer. Salazar asked how many are like that and Drilling said about four. Hoversten clarified there were four complaints but more detached trailers on the streets. Bergquist suggested looking at permitting for contractors that might be needed. Larson noted we are a recreational city and maybe something happened that they need to store it there. Velsor said then they will have an explanation to provide to the nuisance enforcement officer and the neighbors. Drilling said this needs to be addressed as we try to tighten up storage on private property as it may spillover. Velsor said he had issues with an attached trailer that was on a tight corner to begin with so he doesn't have a problem with restricting detached and requiring users to arrange for storage during the boating season. Salazar asked if they were moving it around. Drilling noted one that was parking it 3 blocks away from their property. Hoversten said this is not directed at reasonable people but rather the abusers. Larson clarified vehicle parking is allowed between 2am and Spm and asked if it could stay there for a week. Drilling said over 24 hours, the police would attempt to contact owner to move it and proceed from there. -278- Mound City Council Minutes — January 28, 2020 Drilling said Staff met with the Orono Police Department regarding disorderly properties which get a high volume of public safety calls and they are looking for tools to be able to cite the property owner to address the issues and reduce call volume. Drilling noted the city attorney helped to write the ordinance. Velsor asked if the property owner or renter would be responsible and Drilling said the property owner. Larson asked how many times is considered too many, and Drilling said it depends on the nature of the calls. Lastly, Drilling said the third part is to address the blowing and pushing of leaves and other debris into the street and this is again another tool for the police and public works to be able to abate and charge the expense back to the property owner. Drilling said the property owner would be given notice and the opportunity to resolve the matter before abatement. Requested Actions: i. Approve Ordinance No. 03-2020 Amending Chapter 46 of the Mound City Code Regarding Detached Trailer Parking, Disorderly Property and Littering MOTION by Pugh, seconded by Velsor, to adopt the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 03-2020: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 46 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE REGARDING DETACHED TRAILER PARKING, DISORDERLY PROPERTY, AND LITTERING i. Approve Resolution No. 20-16 Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance By Title and Summary, as it Relates to Detached Trailer Parking, Disorderly Property and Littering (requires 4/5's vote of the City Council) MOTION by Bergquist, seconded by Velsor, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 20-16: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY, AS IT RELATES TO DETACHED TRAILER PARKING, DISORDERLY PROPERTY AND LITTERING 9. Review/discussion of concept/sketch plan for proposed redevelopment of Commerce Place shopping center at 2200-2238 Commerce Boulevard Planning Case No. 20-01 Applicant/owner: Schafer Richardson Trapp, consultant planner, noted the concept plan is an optional exercise and that this is an update to the previous concept plan presented in 2019 and the applicant has made adjustments to try to address the concerns noted at that time. Trapp reviewed existing zoning and noted the project overview was provided in the packet, including 24 1 -bedrooms, 18 2 -bedrooms with the reminder studios for a total of 103 units. Trapp suggested the unit sizes suggest this development will not impact the school district. Trapp noted the project requires a replat and vacation of Fern Lane, noting all impacted parcels are owned by the applicant. Trapp said there is a total of 269 parking stalls, 253 multi -family 4 -279- Mound City Council Minutes — January 28, 2020 and 35 commercial, noting the variance has been reduced and as a destination district a traffic and parking study will be required. Trapp said the 50 feet or less at midpoint requirement has been met now that it is 3 stories and that additional images/views have been included in the packet. Trapp said the main feedback was comments from Hennepin County regarding access and those discussions will continue. Trapp said the Planning Commission asked about outdoor storage restrictions and Trapp said the applicant can limit that and the city can also make limits, noting other comments were standard. Trapp said applications will include a Planned Unit Development (PUD), Conditional Use Permit (CUP), major subdivision, preliminary plat and vacation of Fern Lane and that tonight is to give feedback on the concept. Trapp said another neighborhood meeting will be held in February to provide the neighborhood another chance to give feedback as well. Larson noted she has attended the neighborhood meetings and Planning Commission meetings and said the developer knows she is not happy about this project. Trevor Martinez, Shafer Richardson, said he appreciates the opportunity to address the council and is here for any questions. Bergquist said he appreciated the height and parking were adjusted and that they are holding multiple neighborhood meetings. Salazar asked for Martinez to explain 'market rate' for the benefit of the audience here and at home. Martinez said market rate rent is considered in the range of $1200 -$2000 per month with no subsidy, noting Section 8 vouchers would not be eligible for this level of monthly rent payments. Martinez said Steven Scott Management will manage the property and they do not allow exterior storage on the balconies. Martinez said there will be interior storage options for recreational equipment. Salazar asked what the official name will be and Martinez said it will be decided during the design phase and marketing plan development. Larson said she has been conducting an investigation and it would take a lot of time to explain. Salazar said this is the time to air any questions or concerns vs. the 11" hour, so he encouraged Larson to ask them. Larson said her questions were addressed but she just has concerns. Larson asked Trapp about the Livable Communities presentation that aired on television that she appeared on and Trapp said that was many years ago. Larson said she is concerned about CR15 ins and outs around that corner and the associated danger and that she is not going to let go of the traffic issue. Larson said 20 years ago all the area communities had a conversation with the federal government about HWY 12 and they did not listen and now it is named the corridor of death. Larson said she is concerned that the same thing will happen here and she said the road should not have been realigned. Larson said the post office, trail and transit center complicated things. Salazar said all the concerns are valid, but they have to do with many factors besides this project and noted residential is going to have less traffic than when it was thriving commercial and that it will bring more people who will support our existing businesses. Pugh said her concern is that there are only three ways to get out of this neighborhood complicated by the shopping center across the street. Pugh said it is not pedestrian friendly and some of the egresses need to be closed and traffic needs to slow down. Pugh said she avoids rush hours between 7am and gam and she feels the city, developer, county and possibly Mound Marketplace should be involved in creating a solution. Larson said issues will be compounded if Auditor's Road is blocked off. Salazar reiterated these are all valid points and that it is a privilege to be able to drive and there is a responsibility to drive safely and the rules need to be enforced. Salazar said he and the City Manager are working with Hennepin County on the trail crossing. Hoversten agreed the concerns are 61 � Mound City Council Minutes — January 28, 2020 valid and they are problems that need to be solved regardless of the project. Hoversten said concentrating the conflicts and putting more layers of control over them will be more productive but it will cost money and require the County's assistance. Larson said she started a business in Mound from ground zero and it is still operating to this day. Larson said we are allowing investors to come into the city and implode it with high density residential in our commercial areas. Larson said Pugh asked about whether the library could be moved to this area. Pugh said it is her dream to have it built in the Harbor District. Larson said she regrets the commercial area was not more lucrative and that Shafer Richardson did not divide the property up to make way for more professional services instead of giving up on it. Martinez said Shafer Richardson is sympathetic to that idea, noting 10 years ago they proposed residential and it was rejected and they spent the next five years looking at ways to make the commercial economically viable and it just wasn't possible, so they returned to residential. Larson asked about the rents since there are so many vacancies already and she said she is not a Millennial but wonders who would pay $2200 in downtown Mound with no view when she can go to Lakewinds for less than $1000 a month that includes an indoor pool and parking, etc. Martinez said a variety of reasons create demand, including that there are no new higher -end rentals in Mound targeting higher earners. Velsor asked if he was a new college grad and couldn't buy a property because of student loans where could he rent, noting the closest is The Mist, but that it is not in Mound. Martinez said they would not propose a plan that is not economically viable and that renters will included both Millennials 25 — 40 and some 55+ who want to downsize for lower maintenance and more time to enjoy the recreation in the area. Martinez said guidelines are housing should be 30% of income which would suggest renters would have income in the $48K - $75K range. Bergquist said it is a great project and there will be growing pains but these are county roads. Pugh said we can't stand by and Bergquist said no one is standing by. Pugh thanked Shafer Richardson for broadening the mailing area for the next neighborhood meeting. Hoversten said this is the opportunity to give the developer 'homework' on any concerns that you see in the concept plan. Pugh said at the Planning Commission it was brought up that the city should initiate a conversation with Wells Fargo and what they might be willing to do to help with the project. Hoversten said the Wells Fargo District Manager and Community Relations folks indicated they do not see any need for change unless the City is willing to build to suit and fund the improvements, so if no leverage is offered, the City and developer don't really have any leverage. Samuel Johnson, 2200 Belmont Lane, said they partially abut the property/proposed parking lot and he is concerned about having a parking lot bordering their yard and he is curious about screening requirements. Smith said they are not at that level of the detail but it is customary to provide a higher level of screening between lower and higher -density uses. Johnson asked if the lot is currently zoned residential. Trapp said it is zoned R3 — multi -family residential which is consistent noting the entire area will be rezoned. Johnson said traffic has been talked about a lot and his stretch is the most dangerous because of the hill and parking is allowed on one side of the street. Johnson said traffic will [y -281 - Mound City Council Minutes — January 28, 2020 go that way to get on CR 15 and the city may consider not allowing parking on the street as it is difficult to pass. Morgaine Johnson, 2200 Belmont Lane, asked because of the increase in people so close to residential neighborhoods, will there be additional security in the area since people can already cut through and now there will be more people in the area. Hoversten said the closure of the break in the existing building will also help reduce the tendency to cut through. Merrick Garland, 4842 Dale Road, said he is owner of 3soteric and that Anytime Fitness will be moving next to his business and that will be a great benefit. Garland said he thinks more activity in Stonegate Plaza will slow traffic along the curve but he agrees the County needs to do more. 10. Consideration/action on resolution approving 2040 Mound Comprehensive Plan (Complete Final Version of 2040 Comprehensive Plan available at www.cityofmound.com) Trapp gave a brief overview and stated the Comprehensive Plan guides development through 2040 and that it was a product of public and agency input and review and that the last year was the Met Council evaluation process to ensure it meets requirements of state statue and regional planning objectives for parks and open spaces and regional growth. Trapp noted it is essentially the same plan as presented in fall of 2018 for overall land use with just some technical changes. Trapp said Met Council approved the plan for adoption and once the council adopts it, changes to the zoning code and work plans will be developed. Trapp said 'mixed-use' vs. commercial or residential is emphasized to provide flexibility in the main corridors. Requested Action: Approve Resolution No. 20-17 Resolution Authorizing Adoption of the City of Mound 2040 Comprehensive Plan as Required by Minnesota State Law (Metropolitan Planning Act) — (requires 4/5's vote of the City Council) MOTION by Pugh, seconded by Bergquist, to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Salazar, Velsor, Pugh, Bergquist. The following voted against: Larson. The following abstained: None. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 20-17: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF MOUND 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATE LAW (METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT) 11. Building Official Recommendation Consideration/action on resolution to authorize proceeding with hazardous building action at 4801 Tuxedo Boulevard Scott Qualle, consulting building official from MNSPECT, said on 2-1-18 there was a footings inspection and the property has since been in foreclosure, noting there has been little progress with the current owner who has no concrete plans to address the hazardous excavation and sediment erosion control issues. Qualle said he recommends moving forward with the hazardous building action to start the process with city attorney to allow the city to demolish it as it is not cost justified to repair, although that is technically an option for the owner. n -282- Mound City Council Minutes — January 28, 2020 Salazar asked about the timeline and Qualle said the attorney will file a document in court and that this action is an important progression to show city's attempts to cooperate with the property owner. Salazar noted this is an unfortunate last resort and hopefully the owner will respond. Bergquist asked if footings would be classified as unbuildable. Velsor said it is an issue when they are exposed to frost. Qualle said they would have to reapply for permits and they would be asked to show they are still viable. MOTION by Larson, seconded by Velsor, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 20-18: RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE PROCEEDING WITH HAZARDOUS BUILDING ACTION FOR PROPERTY AT 4801 TUXEDO BOULEVARD Qualle then offered a public safety message to the audience and said he was in court today about a non -licensed contractor for a roofing job where the owner bought the materials and paid the contractor $4K in labor but the roof eventually leaked and caused $5K in damages and the owner had to have someone else do the repairs. Qualle said the contractor was sanctioned, but there is no real recourse as the contractor moved to Wisconsin. The owner is now looking to criminally prosecute the misdeamor offence of acting as contractor without being licensed but the contractor was a no-show. Qualle said the owner did all of this to protect the next guy so the lesson is to make sure you pull a permit so you have those protections to ensure they are licensed and complete the job right, noting cutting corners doesn't always save money. 12. Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, requesting discussion and action on updated ADMIN POLICY XXX: Personnel Policy —Code of Conduct Pausche said she and Council Member Larson have been working on this policy since the original version was proposed in August of 2019. Pausche noted the city has a series of policies addressing personnel matters, in addition to the Collective Bargaining Agreement for union employees and the Administrative Code for non-union, but this new Personnel Policy — Code of Conduct consolidates and updates many of them. Pausche said the staff has participated in training on respectful workplace behavior and this policy is meant to define expectations and also to formalize procedures if a complaint or concern is received, particularly in the area of harassment. Pausche said language has been added to include incidents involving harassment of non -employees, including residents, per Council Member Larson's direction and that the City labor attorneys have reviewed the harassment policy section and Complaint form. Pugh asked if there is a policy or procedure addressing how often the policy will be reviewed and updated. Pausche said typically the date is "TBD — to be determined" and noted that the League of Minnesota Cities is good at notifying its members of changes in regulations. Pausche noted any policy can be updated at any time and this will be a living document that will remain at the forefront. Bergquist asked how much time the attorney's final review took and Pausche said less than $500. 8 -283- Mound City Council Minutes — January 28, 2020 MOTION by Bergquist, seconded by Pugh, to approve the following policy. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ADMIN POLICY 002: PERSONNEL POLICY — CODE OF CONDUCT 13. Council Member Sherrie Pugh with an update on the 2020 Census Pugh said she attended a Hennepin County complete count meeting and noted how important it is that everyone is counted as Minnesota is at risk of losing a congressional seat. Pugh said an on-line map will be available that will show areas that were undercounted in previous years, noting that they are often in multi -family complexes, and that the library will be accommodating people to complete the census on-line. Pugh said babies born as of March 31' are to be counted which is very important to the school district. Pugh said there are outreach efforts and many organizations are participating in communicating the importance of the census. Salazar said there will be enhanced communication efforts as this will be different as counting is going to be all on-line. Salazar said reps from the county will follow-up with those households that did respond and he encouraged everyone to participate and work with the county reps if asked. 14. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Council members/City Manager: The City Manager highlighted the following dates: Regular Council meeting on Tuesday 2/25 moved to 2/26 because of Precinct Caucus night March 3 — Presidential Nominating Primary — polls open with absentee balloting now available March 20-29 Mound Westonka Spring Break Salazar said he participated in the Polar Plunge with the Fire Department team noting it was for a great cause and was great fun. Salazar said on a sad note, former Mayor Pat Meisel passed away earlier today and noted she was mayor from 1999-2006. Salazar said thoughts and prayers are with her family. B. Reports: Finance Dept — December 2019 Draft C. Minutes: Docks & Commons Commission — Nov. 21, 2019 Parks and Open Spaces Commission — 14 Nov 2019 D. Correspondence: Presidential Nomination Primary Election Information 15. Adjourn MOTION by Velsor, seconded by Bergquist, to adjourn at 9:11 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk 01 Mayor Raymond J. Salazar Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 JAN 2 i 202 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number [Our Lady of the Lake Church and School Jan 1, 1909 8382779 Address City State Zip Code 2385 Commerce Blvd. __7 (Mound l Minnesota 55364 Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Rhda M. Furich, Administrator on 95 -82012-472 612-269-4617 Date(s) of event Type of organization March 7, 2020 —� ❑ Club ❑ Charitable MX Religious [] Other non-profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Fr. Tony O'Neill Mound Minnesota 55364 Organization officer's name Organization officer's name Organization officer's name Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe OLL Parish Activity Center 2385 Commerce Blvd. City State Zip Code — � Minnesota .- I City State Zip Code Minnesota I I City State Zip Code Minnesota if the applicant will contract for Intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. A4 Q_1,ed If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Self -Insured through the Archdiocese of St. Paul & Minneapolis, with program administered through Catholic Mutual $500,000 GL and $500,000 XL APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Date Approved Date Fee Paid Signature City Clerk or County Official C.,. (4TV\C.Y 1 /`i,. dMyl `3 G✓�K. l;. -T C. All V ( 4,L n -.AC . City or County E -m it Address gI)_po(* 213 City or County Phone Number Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement `,i�jIt,i�is �r to;vk rl: d ,_!I ern -,van i, s, _ol ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/ggSNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATI04@$TATE.MN.US Executive Summary TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE: SUBJECT: APPUCANT: LOCATION: PID NUMBER: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director February 6, 2020 No. 20-04 Waiver of Platting Daniel Johnson (4 Ps Investments LLC) 1754 Shorewood Lane 13-11]-24-11-0134 February 11, 2020 Low Density Residential R 1 SingleFamilyResidential SUMMARY The applicant, Daniel Johnson, submitted a waiver of platting application for the property at 1754 Shorewood Lane and is requesting approval to release Lot 1, Block 3, Shadywood Point from the current parcel holding. The purposefor waiver into create a new conforming lotto accommodate future construction of a new single-family home. The applicant plansto reside in the new home to be built on original Lot 1(proposed "Parcel Y'). City Code Section 121-33 (2) allows for a parcel of land that has been combined for tax purposes or for other reasons to be separated or divided if a waiver of platting is approved by the City Council. The waiver of platting does not disqualify the involved parcels from lot of record status. The waiver of platting must comply with all planning and zoning standards and objectives. The applicant also submitted a variance application to request a 6 -foot setback from Sunrisee Landing. As part of research and Planning Report preparation, Staffs determination is that Sunset Landing was not platted as a street. Therefore, a 6 -foot setback is required in this location and variance approval was not needed. Details regarding Staffs review of the request is included in the Planning Report for PC Cases 20-04/20-05 and supporting information which has been included as an attachment(s). En PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their February 4th meeting. The applicant, Daniel Johnson, was present at the meeting. Staff provided an overview of the requested waiver and commented that Lot 1, which is being requested to be separated from the current parcel holding meets the requirements for a R -1A lakeshore lot as a lot of record. The applicant, who resides at 1766 Shorewood Lane, which abuts the subject parcel on the south side, intends to build and reside in the new home to be constructed. Staff also explained that a variance application was submitted however Staff's determination is that a 6 -foot setback is allowed as Sunrise Landing, which serves as a point of access to the lake, was not platted as a street in the Shadywood Point plat. Therefore, the 6 -foot setback is conforming and a variance is not required. 2 neighboring property owners attended the meeting. One of the neighbors in attendance commented on wetland/filling activities that took place by a previous owner. Staff noted that the Hennepin County Natural Resources mapping system and wetlands map in the Comprehensive Plan did not indicate wetlands on the property. However, there is some historical information in the property about floodplain/wetland filling regulations and activities and potential wetland conditions in the property jacket. The applicant informed the Planning Commission that he had been in touch with the MCWD and was informed there were no wetlands present. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommended approval of the waiver application, with the recommendations and findings from Staff, with an additional condition that a wetland and soils report be prepared and provided prior to future home construction. The Planning Commission also unanimously voted to recommend Staff's setback determination be affirmed with the finding that Sunrise Landing is not a platted street. Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendations for approval, a resolution has been prepared for City Council consideration. The draft minute excerpts from the February 4th Planning Commission meeting have been included as information. NOTIFICATION Neighboring property owners, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed notice on February 5th to inform them that the variance was being included on the consent agenda for the February 11th City Council meeting for action. -287- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 20 - RESOLUTION TO APPROVE WAIVER OF PLATTING FOR 1754 SHOREWOOD LANE The applicant, Daniel Johnson, on behalf of 4 J's Investments LLC, submitted a waiver of platting application for the property at 1754 Shorewood Lane requesting approval to release Lot 1, Block 3, Shadywood Point from the current parcel holding. The purpose for waiver is to create a new conforming lot to accommodate future construction of a new single-family home; and WHEREAS, the property at 1754 Shorewood Lane generally described as Lots 1 — 3, Block 3, Shadywood Point; and WHEREAS, the applicant intends to subdivide Lot 1 (Proposed Parcel 1) from the current parcel along the using original plat lot lines, with the exception of boundary adjustment activities involving the shared lot line with Lot 4, which took place in the early 80's and is not affected with the separation of proposed Lot 1, Block 3, Shadywood Point, to allow construction of a conforming single family house; and WHEREAS, the applicant intends to reside in the future new home to be constructed; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1A and single-family residential is a permitted use; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 121-33 (2) states that a waiver of platting request may be granted by the City Council if it is determined that the proposal is in compliance with the City Code; and WHEREAS, lots that are separated by a waiver of platting retain lot of record status; and WHEREAS, a variance application was also submitted to allow a side setback of 6 feet on the north side abutting Sunrise Landing. Staff's determination is that a variance is not required as a 6 foot side setback is allowed as Sunrise Landing was not designated as a street in the plat of Shadywood Point; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the waiver of platting request at its February 4, 2020 meeting and recommended Council approval subject to the conditions and findings, as recommended by Staff, with an additional condition that a wetland and soils condition report be prepared. The Planning Commission also recommended the Council affirm Staff's determination that a variance is not required as the assigned setback on the north side is 6 feet as Sunrise Landing was not platted as a street; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the waiver of platting was made within the required timeline in Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, in approving the waiver of platting, the City Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. The lots created with the waiver are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan guiding of Low Density Residential. 2. The lots involved in the waiver and adjacent property owned by the applicant are original platted lots. The new buildable lot being split is an original platted configuration. 3. The new buildable lot on Lot 1 (Parcel 1) meets the lot size, lot width, and lot depth for a R -1A District lakeshore lot of record. The future new home to be constructed will be conforming to setbacks. 4. The existing/proposed lots have improved access on an improved public street. 5. The proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of new single- family home on Lot 1. 6. The waiver of platting will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 7. The City Council affirms that a variance is not needed as the required setback on the north side is 6 feet as Sunrise Landing was not platted as a street in the plat of Shadywood Point. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approves waiver of platting for the property at 1754 Shorewood Lane with the following conditions: 1. New driveways must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. Minimum side setbacks of one (1) foot are required for driveways. 2. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties. 3. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including, but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 4. As part of the City's approval of the waiver, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, or designee, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. The standard drainage and utility easement is five feet wide on side and rear lot lines and ten feet in width along the front lot line but shall be as determined by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Easement(s) shall be provided in an appropriate form so as to allow for recording at Hennepin County and shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to recording and require signatures from property owners and lienholders of record. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all public agency permit issuance. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 7. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the waiver application is approved. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met and all fees for the waiver application have been paid and the escrow account is in good standing. The submittal of additional escrow may be required. 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 10. No grading or alteration is permitted or authorized below the 931.5 which is the 100 - year floodplain elevation for the MCWD unless permitting has been received. 11. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or 3 feet above a wetland. The RFPE for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0. 12. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -foot lakeshore setback or 100 -year floodplain area(s). Any work in public right of way or on public property requires permission and coordination with the Public Works Department. 13. Grading and drainage plans for the future new home will be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Director at the time of building permit application. 14. Sewer and water area trunk charges in the amount of $2000.00 each for one (1) lot shall be paid prior to the release of the resolution. Total: $4000.00. 15. A park dedication fee in the amount of $1,100.00 shall be paid prior to the release of the resolution. 16. Sewer connection and water connection fees for one lot shall be paid at the time of the building permit release. The amount due shall be the current rate in place at the time of building permit issuance. The 2020 sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. 17. One MCES Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) will be collected with the future building permit. The amount due shall be the current rate the time of future building permit release. The 2020 MCES SAC rate is $2495.00 18. Future home construction on the new lot (Parcel 1) shall conform in all regards to City Code requirements and City approvals. -290- 19. As applicable, if the subdivision requires the construction of municipal utility improvements (i.e., services, etc.), these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution or applicant shall be responsible for the submittal of a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee) and submittal of a cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate. 20. The applicant shall provide legal descriptions in electronic form (MS Word preferred) for the drainage/utility easement document(s) to be prepared. 21. Applicant is responsible for all costs for the waiver request 22. Additional comments and/or conditions from the City Council, Staff, consultants, and public agencies. 23. Applicant shall be required to prepare and submit wetland/soils report prior to future new home construction. This waiver of platting is hereby approved for the following described property: LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Existing Parcel) (- to be inserted-). NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (- to be inserted-) Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of February, 2020. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Raymond J. Salazar, Mayor -291 - MINUTE EXCERPTS (DRAFT) MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 4, 2020 Chair Pelka called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. SWEARING IN OF PLANNING COMMISSIONERS BY CITY MANAGER ERIC HOVERSTEN Commissioner Sue Pilling was sworn in for a term on the Planning Commission. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Pelka; Commissioners Jon Ciatti, Kevin Castellano, Jake Saystrom, Jason Baker, Drew Heal, Sue Pilling and Councilmember Sherri Pugh. Absent: David Goode. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith. Members of the public: Dan Johnson, 1766 Shorewood Lane; Bruce Gustafson, 1743 Shorewood Lane; and Pat Baker, 1753 Shorewood Lane. BOARD OF APPEALS PC Case No. 20-04/PC Case No. 20-05 Waiver of Platting and Variance 1754 Shorewood Lane Applicant: Dan Johnson / 4 J's Investments LLC Smith introduced an overview of the planning case for a waiver of platting to subdivide the property at 1754 Shorewood Lane, submitted by property owner Dan Johnson. The applicant seeks to subdivide Lot 1 from current property along the original lot lines. The current configuration is bounded by Shorewood Lane on the west side, Sunrise Landing on the north side, Lake Minnetonka on the east and 1766 Shorewood Lane on the south side, which is also owned by the applicant. Smith describes the process of the waiver of platting per Mound code as a simplified version of a subdivision that involves lots that have been tax combined. There were lot combination/division and boundary adjustment activities involving the property and adjacent Lot 4 which is also owned by the applicant. The applicant seeks to reestablish original lot lines, as per the original platting of Shadywood and separate Lot 1 from the current parcel. The purpose is to split the vacant lot off so it is its own parcel. The property is zoned R 1-A (single family lot). For the purposes of waiver of platting, a lot needs 50 feet of frontage at the street, 50 feet of frontage at the minimum front setback from the street which is 20 feet, 50 feet of frontage at the ordinary high water mark and a 50 foot lake shore setback. Evaluation of the survey submitted by the owner's surveyor, the proposed subdivision, both the current lot and the proposed new lot, would be conforming to those regulations. -292- Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 2 February 4, 2020 Smith discussed the need for a variance. One of the discussion points is how Sunrise Landing is described in the plat. According to the code, there are different setbacks depending on right of ways, streets of different widths and if those are improved or unimproved. The plat of Shadywood Point designates the area as Sunrise Landing not a street or road. Staff's commented that it views the area similar to a park and its determination is that the required setback on the north side is 6 feet as Sunrise Landing is not a street. The proposed house being planned is for a single family, 2 -story home with an attached garage, accessed from Shorewood Lane on the west side and a walk -out on the lake side. Smith noted that the Johnson's (current land owners) plan to reside in the home to be constructed on Lot 1. The structure, as proposed, is consistent with the setbacks that would apply for the lot. The proposed home is also conforming for the proposed waiver of platting. Smith added that this case consists of the land use portion of the application. Other activities may come forth in the event the waiver moves forward and as more detailed plans and survey information, is received, in terms of existing and proposed grading, will be required as part of building permit processing. The items that staff looks for is a conforming building pad, conforming hard cover, that structures are meeting required setbacks and other applicable code requirements; also agency permits. It's normal and customary that a new single family home will require review by the watershed district for their applied site rules on such things as shoreline alteration, flood plain, wetland, erosion control, storm water, shore line and streams, etc. Most new home construction projects will require, at a minimum, an erosion control permit from the MCWD Smith outlined the process for a waiver. If there are no variances, a waiver can be acted upon by the City Council without Planning Commission review. However, the Council may remand any application back to the Planning Commission. Because of the submitted variance and determination of the north side setback that was done, Staff thought the Commission's review prior to Council consideration would be beneficial. Smith discussed how the proposal is evaluated related to the City's comprehensive plan. The area is guided "low-density' and the new comprehensive plan is 1-6 dwelling units per acre. The addition of one new lot in this area is conforming to the comprehensive plan. Lot of record setbacks are allowed for a lot of record. The new lot and the remnant lot are conforming and will remain conforming. Adjacent land uses are residential with the exception the landing which is public. Flood plain in Mound for FEMA is 931. Structures need to be 2 feet above that the 100 -year elevation. The watershed district elevation is higher by 6 inches and is 931.5. Under their rules you cannot grade, alter or fill at or below the 931.5. For Mound the lowest floor has to be not less than 933. If there are filling activities at or below the 931.5, the watershed will require permitting and fill compensation. With this plan there will be some filling activity. Hennepin County GIS and the wetland map in the comprehensive plan did shown wetlands on the property. Smith explained the process for fees and collection of fees. In regards to lots that are split off as a waiver, when those activities are recorded the new structures trigger standard fees, including a park dedication fee, trunk water, trunk sewer, sewer and water connection charges, in -293- Planning Commission Minutes - Draft February 4, 2020 addition to MCES SAC charges. Trunk and park fees would be collected with the resolution while the other fees would be collected as part of a future building permit. The applicant confirmed the property has no liens or mortgages. It has not been determined if there are sewer and water stubs to the property. If they are not there, they will need to be constructed in coordination with Public Works and the Engineering Department or escrow will need to be submitted. Smith reiterates that this discussion deals solely with the subdivision of the property. The approval of this waiver of platting does not guarantee approval of any future building permits. That would be a completely different phase of the process that would require the submittal of very detailed design plans. Smith says that Staff's recommendation for approval of the waiver of platting is based on several facts of findings. The lots created with the waiver are consistent with the comp plan guidance of low density residential. The lots involved in the waiver and the adjacent properties, owned by the applicant, are original platted lots, the new buildable lot being split is an original platted configuration. The new buildable lot, known as Parcel 1 has access on to an improved public street. The lot arrangement can accommodate construction of a new single family home. The waiver of platting does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on the property. Smith says the applicant is in attendance. She also notes that the while City is not required to notify adjacent owners, Staff does this as a courtesy so neighbors are aware of applications and have the opportunity to learn about a project and ask questions of Staff or an applicant. Pelka asks if anyone has questions for Smith. Baker asks for clarification that in a normal subdivision you lose lot of record, what is the definition of waiver of platting? Smith replies that with a waiver of platting you are working with lots that have been combined for tax purposes or other reason involving original lots. For the subject parcel, there lot combinations/divisions and a small boundary adjustment at one point and the lot being split (Lot 1) is using original lot lines. Historically, there have been properties that have been combined by owners or previous owners including tax purposes. Baker recalls a previous conversation regarding tax combining lots and wonders why a waiver is needed. Smith replies that the 3 lots are combined with 1 PID and requires a waiver to split Lot 1 from the current parcel. Saystrom asks for clarification about the Planning Cases 20-04 (the waiver of platting) and 20- 05 (the variance). He wonders if staff is seeking recommendations that the 6 -foot setback assignment to Sunrise Landing. Smith replies that it is staff's determination and suggests the Planning Commission establish that as part of their action. -294- Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 4 February 4, 2020 Saystrom asks if there are curbs at the landing. Smith replies no. Saystrom asks if the hard cover calculations include a permeable driveway. Smith says the applicant could have up to 40% hard cover with lot of record, subject to conditions. If they use a pervious driveway in a product that is commercially designed, installed and engineered, if approved, the applicant could get up to maximum reduction not exceeding 85%. Saystrom asks if a reduction 85% is correct. Smith replies up to 85%, meaning on an 85% allowable reduction, 15% of the drive way would count. Heal asks what the applicant will do with his driveway, wondering if he will move it to the right because it goes right across the property. Pelka asks what the applicant and asks if anyone has questions for Smith. Hearing none, Pelka asks the applicant to step forward with any discussion and will open up for questions. Applicant Johnson begins by saying he has owned lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, currently residing on Lot 4. Johnson says his family has owned the properties since the 70s. Pelka asks the applicant to state his name and address for the record. The applicant states he is Dan Johnson, residing at 1766 Shorewood Lane. He continues, saying he has owned his current home since 1983 but it has been in his family since the 70s. He stated the Anderson family homesteaded Lots 1 and 2 and Lot 3 came with his house. Previously, there was a cabin sitting on the land, with no footings. That structure burned down. When his family purchased the property they split off Lot 3 and the Anderson's bought that and combined Lots 1 and 2. The Andersons had a summer cabin that sat on Lot 2 which was torn down when Anderson's mother passed and he built a home on Lots 2 and 3. Lot 1 has never had a structure built on it. Johnson acquired the property in 2006 when the owner passed away. A family member lived in the home on Lots 2 and 3, the Johnsons remained in the home on Lot 4 and he now seeks to build a new residence on Lot 1 by restoring the original lot lines. He explains the history behind the lot adjustment that the original house on Lot 4 infringed over the lot line of Lot 3 and so the lot lines were adjusted to make the home conforming to the 6 foot setback. Johnson says the plan is to build a new home on Lot 1 and he will reside in the new home. Johnson addresses the earlier question regarding the driveway that will be right across the property. Johnson says the driveway will come off the road and he won't use it for his boats but will be storage area. Johnson says the driveway comes right off the landing and members of the public block the access or think they can park there. Johnson says they originally thought they would need to use pavers for the driveway, but survey revealed they had more surface area than expected and the current design the property would be slightly under the 40% so pavers won't be needed to remain in compliance. Johnson says the current house on Lots 2 and 3 has a basement at the elevation of 934 and states the low grade on the new home will be at the 934 elevation, as well. -295- Planning Commission Minutes - Draft February 4, 2020 Pelka asks if there are any additional questions for the applicant. Hearing none, he asks if anyone else would like to take the podium with questions or comments. Resident Pat Baker, residing at 1753 Shorewood Lane, which is directly across the street from the proposed project. She says when the previous owner built the house on Lots 2 and 3, he tried to fill in the low spot on Lot 1. She says that someone from the City told him he could not do that and made him drudge the dirt back out of there because it was a wetland. She would like to know why that changed or how that could change. She also states that there is no curb there but that there is a gutter that runs with drainage to the lake. Heal asks Ms. Baker if the proposed new home will block her view, if approved. She confirmed her view will be affected but that she would still have a view. Saystrom asks Smith who the authority would be for elevation maps and surveys. Smith responded that she believes that Mr. Saystrom may be asking about wetland evaluation. The presence of a wetland is based on soils and hydrology and that there are different classifications. Smith reiterated that there is some historical data that talked about the potential of a wetland somewhere in the vicinity, however, there was no wetland delineation in the file. There was also information about flood plain alteration but no permitting in the file. Smith adds this area did not show up on the City's wetlands map in the comprehensive plan. Additionally, wetlands were not depicted on the Hennepin County Natural Resources mapping system. Smith commented that the watershed was forwarded a copy of the proposal and they did not have any comments on the presence of a wetland. Smith says if there are suspected wetlands, the City and the watershed can require delineation. She continues that when you get down to those lower numbers, the soils can get soft, that doesn't indicate wetlands, but it could be due to poor soil. If it is suspected that there may be a wetland, the city can require verification that there is no wetlands present. Applicant Johnson states he researched with the watershed prior to beginning this project and they told him there were no wetlands. Ciatti asks Johnson if it were determined he needed a variance for the side lot, would he need to go back to the drawing board. Johnson believes based on the city's review of the landing that the variance is not required. Smith says that because it is platted as a landing and not a street a 6 -foot setback is correct and appropriate. Ciatti asks Smith about a wetland delineation, if the waiver of platting goes through would additional testing be done to look at the soils. Smith says that the City can order a soils study be completed if they have any question. Smith suggests that the applicant might want to finalize that by having the watershed and the City can look at it but the season is not appropriate for that type of investigation. Smith said the Commission could consider adding that as a condition of the recommendation. -296- Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 6 February 4, 2020 Pugh asks the owner if he is sure he wants to build the house at the 6 foot setback based on her witness of speeding traffic on the lake. Johnson responds that because there is no trailer parking on the road, the majority of the traffic is neighbors landing their boats in the spring and fall so historically he has not noticed much traffic even on weekends. It was discussed that from the paved edge of the landing, to the lot line is about 20 feet and the house would sit past that. Castellano mentions the driveway scenario may actually improve with the presence of a home. Johnson confirms this is his belief as well. Pelka calls for any additional questions from the commission or the audience prior to commissioners beginning discussions. Hearing none, Pelka begins discussions. He believes the question surrounding if there is or is not wetlands on the property would be for the applicant to figure out as part of the new home building application. Ciatti agrees and believes it would be appropriate for the commission to recommend a wetland investigation due to the elevation and because the applicant discussed soil issues on one of the other lots to check for similar soil conditions. Castellano agrees that there are could be any number of reasons why the previous owner was required to remove the fill he added and the absence of a permit could have been the reason. In his opinion if the lot is buildable he believes it's in the best interest of everyone to move forward. Smith is recognized and adds that she believes it would be beneficial to reaffirm the setback determination. MOTION by Castellano to recommend to approve PC #20-04, waiver of platting with staff recommendations 1-22 and findings of fact 1-6 with a recommendation to have a soil and wetland evaluation on the property; seconded by Baker. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Baker to recommend that no variance is needed for PC #20-05 due to the fact that, what is platted as Sunrise Landing is not a street, therefore the side setbacks should be 6 feet as a standard lot of record; seconded by Saystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. -297- Planning Report TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 31, 2020 PLANNING CASE: No. 20-04/No. 20-05 SUBJECT: Waiver of Platting and Variance APPUCANT: Daniel Johnson (4 Ps Investments LLC) LOCATION: 1754 Shorewood Lane PID NUMBER: 13-11]-24-11-0134 MEETING DATE: February 4, 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING: R 1 Single- Family Residential REVIEW PROCEDURE The applicant, Daniel Johnson, submitted a waiver of platting application for the property at 1754 Shorewood Lane requesting approval to release Lot 1, Block 3, Shadvea od Point from the current parcel holding. The purpose for waiver is to create a new conforming lot to accommodate future construction of a new single-family home. The applicant plans to reside in the new home to be built on original Lot 1(proposed "Parcel V). The applicant also submitted a variance application to request a 6 -foot setback from Sunset Landing. As part of research and Planning Report preparation, Staffs determination is that Sunset Landing was not platted as a street. Therefore, a 6 -foot setback is required in this location and variance approval is not needed. REVIEW PROCEDURE Waiver of Platting City Code Section 121-33 (2) allows for a parcel of land that has been combined for tax purposes or for other reasons to be separated or divided if a waiver of platting is approved by the City Council. The waiver of platting does not disqualify the involved parcels from lot of record status. The waiver of platting must comply with all planning and zoning standards and objectives. ME Variance City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance, the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, 'Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Review Process Timelines. Minnesota statutes require approval or denial of subdivision and land use requests within 60 -days unless an extension is granted by the applicant for the subdivision and the City executes an extension for the land use application as provided by MS 15.99. The applications were submitted on January 7, 2020. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the required timeline for action on the waiver and variance applications and was determined to be January 8, 2020. -299- Notification. Abutting property owners per Hennepin County tax records, were sent written notice on January 30, 2020 to inform them of the waiver of platting and variance requests and that the applications were included on the February 4, 2020, Planning Commission meeting agenda for review. SITE INFORMATION The 21,000 square foot lakeshore property is located on the east side of Shorewood Lane and abuts Sunset Landing on its north side which functions as a lake access point to Lake Minnetonka. There is a driveway access for the neighboring property in Sunset Landing. The submitted survey shows the existing and proposed lot configuration for the property at 1754 Shorewood Lane. Historical information from the applicant is that cabins were previously located on both Lot 2 and Lot 3. The existing single family house, which was constructed in 1995, is currently and will continue to be conforming to setbacks and hardcover. The applicant is requesting a waiver of platting to split off Lot 1 from the current parcel holding, which is generally described as Lots 1-3, Block 3, Shadywood, with a slight exception of the south line that involves Lot 4. Based on file research, there were previous waiver actions involving the subject property that took place in the early 80's which generally can be described as boundary adjustment and lot combination/lot rearrangement activities. Staff's determination is that these historical actions do not disqualify the property from a waiver request. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low Density Residential, which allows for single-family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 dwelling units/acre. Density is computed area wide as opposed to an individual site. The addition of one home in this neighborhood would meet the comprehensive plan designation. Zoning. The following table includes the lot area, width and setback requirements for a lakeshore lot in the R -1A District as allowed for a waiver of platting: The waiver of platting application meets the lot area, width/frontage and depth requirements based on survey information. -300- Lot Area Width / Frontage (street/lakeshore) Depth Front Setback Side Setback(s) Rear Setback R -1A 6,000 SF 50 FT 80 FT 20 6 feet —side (south)* 50 feet - lakeshore feet 6 feet —side (north)* *Denotes lot of record setbacks. The waiver of platting application meets the lot area, width/frontage and depth requirements based on survey information. -300- Adjacent Land Uses. The subject property is surrounded on the south side by residential use and public property on the north side. Residential uses are also located on the west side of Shorewood Lane. Floodplain. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the ordinary high water mark of a wetland, as applicable. This will be a condition of approval for the waiver and future building permit. The 100 -year FEMA Floodplain for Lake Minnetonka is 931.0 and the RFPE is 933.0. the MCWD's 100 -year floodplain elevation is 931.5 and requires permitting for any work at or below this elevation and requires compensation for filling activities. Wetland. Figure 2.4 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan does not show wetlands on the property subject property. In the event property conditions indicate the possible presence of wetlands, a wetland boundary determination would be required. Wetlands are subject to MCWD regulations and required permitting to include buffering and compensation. Park Land Dedication. Sec. 121-121 of the City Code includes regulations regarding park land and or park dedication in the form of a cash payment for new lots being created. INFRASTRUCTURE Storm Water - Stormwater permitting is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) following regulatory authority turn back to the District by the Mound City Council which took place in August, 2011. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Sewer Area Charge (SAC). The 2016 MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. The MCES charge would be collected at the time of building permit issuance. City Water/ Sewer and Water Trunk Area Charge/Sewer and Water Connection Charges Trunk Fees. The 2020 trunk water fee is $2,000.00 per lot and the 2020 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per lot. Payment of trunk water and trunk sewer charges for one additional lot will be collected prior to release of the resolution. Connection Charges. The 2020 sewer connection fee is $240.00 per lot and the 2020 water connection fee is $240.00 for one additional lot. These fees will be collected at the time of building permit issuance and shall be the amounts in effect at that time. -301 - STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the applications and supporting materials were forwarded to City departments, the City's consultants and involved public agencies for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and, are therefore, not included in this report. See comment received which is summarized below: Erin Manlick, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) MCWD has no comments on the proposed subdivision other than that a proposed structure on Lot 1 will likely require an erosion control permit. DISCUSSION / INFORMATION 1. A survey of the subject property prepared by Sathre-Bergquist was submitted for the waiver application (revision date January 20, 2020). 2. Waiver applications do not require Planning Commission review according to the City Code, unless a variance is required. As previously mentioned, Staff's evaluation is that the assigned setback on the north side is 6 -feet as Sunset Landing per original plat is not a street/road/avenue. Therefore, a variance is not needed. The waiver is being referred to the Planning Commission as it is Staff's opinion that Planning Commission review of the waiver will be beneficial prior to consideration by the City Council. Staff will provide additional comment regarding the north setback at the meeting. 3. The proposed waiver application does not involve any construction activities. However, future construction of a new single-family home is anticipated by the applicant. Preliminary plans submitted show a 2 -story walkout with lakeside deck and attached garage. The applicant/owner intends to live in the proposed new home. 4. According to Hennepin County property tax records, the subject property is considered to be one parcel. The proposal will split Lot 1 from the subject parcel. 5. As the property includes one structure, municipal sewer and water trunk area charge, connection fees, and park dedication fees are required to be paid for the additional lot being split off prior to the release of the resolution; also the required MCES SAC and connection charges applicable at the time the building permit is issued. 6. The MCWD is the regulatory and permitting authority for Rule B (Erosion Control), Rule C (Floodplain Control), Rule D (Wetland Protection) and Rule N (Stormwater Management); also shoreline alteration. -302- 7. It has not been determined if there are water and sewer service presently available to proposed Parcel 1. If not, all involved work, to include required permitting, will be required and accepted by the Public Works Department prior to resolution release. Alternately, a contractor's estimate for the subject work and financial security in the amount of 125 percent, will be required to be submitted and is subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Superintendent. 8. Approval of the proposed waiver of platting does not constitute or guarantee future approval of any building permit(s) or any other necessary approval by any other public agency. 9. If applicable, lienholder or bank consent will be required prior to future release of the resolution following the City Council's action on the waiver application. 10. Drainage and utility easements for the subject lots will be required if the waiver of platting is approved and requires execution by the owners of record; also any bank or lien holders. The easements need to be provided in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County. The location and size of the easements shall be determined by the City Manager -Director of Public Works (or designee). 11. According to Figure 5.3 in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Sunrise Landing is classified as Type D Commons (Wetlands, wildlife areas, beaches, boat landings and transient docks. No leased dock sites). 12. Applicant is advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and/or earthwork sites in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds have been severely impacted by development over the years, the mounds do, however, receive protection under state law; and penalties are imposed for unauthorized disturbance of mounds. The City maintains some general information about possible sites in an inventory of the "Earthwork/Mound/Burial Areas" and in surveys of the burial sites from Hill and Lewis in 1911 but the completeness or accuracy of this information is unknown. Additional information may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archaeologist. -303- STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Planning Commission recommend approval of the waiver of platting subject to the following conditions: 1. New driveways must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. Minimum side setbacks of one (1) foot are required for driveways. 2. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties. 3. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including, but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 4. As part of the City's approval of the waiver, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, or designee, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. The standard drainage and utility easement is five feet wide on side and rear lot lines and ten feet in width along the front lot line but shall be as determined by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Easement(s) shall be provided in an appropriate form so as to allow for recording at Hennepin County and shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to recording and require signatures from property owners and lienholders of record. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 7. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the waiver application is approved. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met and all fees for the waiver application have been paid and the escrow account is in good standing. The submittal of additional escrow may be required. -304- 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 10. No grading or alteration is permitted or authorized below the 931.5 which is the 100 - year floodplain elevation for the MCWD unless permitting has been received. 11. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or 3 feet above a wetland. The RFPE for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0. 12. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -foot lakeshore setback or 100 -year floodplain area(s). Any work in public right of way or on public property requires permission and coordination with the Public Works Department. 13. Grading and drainage plans for the future new home will be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Director at the time of building permit application. 14. Sewer and water area trunk charges in the amount of $2000.00 each for one (1) lot shall be paid prior to the release of the resolution. Total: $4000.00. 15. A park dedication fee in the amount of $1,100.00 shall be paid prior to the release of the resolution. 16. Sewer connection and water connection fees for one lot shall be paid at the time of the building permit release. The amount due shall be the current rate in place at the time of building permit issuance. The 2020 sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. 17. One MCES Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) will be collected with the future building permit. The amount due shall be the current rate the time of future building permit release. The 2020 MCES SAC rate is $2495.00 18. Future home construction on the new lot (Parcel 1) shall conform in all regards to City Code requirements and City approvals. 19. As applicable, if the subdivision requires the construction of municipal utility improvements (i.e., services, etc.), these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution or applicant shall be responsible for the submittal of a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee) and submittal of a cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate. -305- 20. The applicant shall provide legal descriptions in electronic form (MS Word preferred) for the drainage/utility easement document(s) to be prepared. 21. Applicant is responsible for all costs for the waiver request 22. Additional comments and/or conditions from the City Council, Staff, consultants, and public agencies. Staff recommends Planning Commission recommend approval of the waiver of platting based on the following findings of fact: 1. The lots created with the waiver are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan guiding of Low Density Residential. 2. The lots involved in the waiver and adjacent property owned by the applicant are original platted lots. The new buildable lot being split is an original platted configuration. 3. The new buildable lot on Lot 1 (Parcel 1) meets the lot size, lot width, and lot depth for a R -1A District lakeshore lot of record. The future new home to be constructed will be conforming to setbacks. 4. The existing/proposed lots have improved access on an improved public street. 5. The proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of new single- family home on Lot 1. 6. The waiver of platting will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW The tentative date for City Council consideration of the application is Tuesday, February 11, 2020 with an alternate date of Tuesday, February 25, 2020. -306- WAIVER OF PLATTING . - I-- APPLICATION J 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 r Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 City Council Date: CaseyVra Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of L10flon. � PROPERTY Subject Address /75-S(' ZlyoREvWeGD Z, UC - INFO EXISTING Lot(s) 2�'� Block 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - .., .ion Sy/�AXV-1oG� iolNT PID# PROPOSED A. Lot(s) / -Block3 LEGAL B. Lot(s) 02 ^t 3 Block 3 DESCRIPTION Zoning District Circle:1 R -1A.' R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 PROPERTY Are there existing structures on the property?ye. 1 no Do the existing structures comply with the zoning ordinance for setbacks, hardcover, etc.?60 / no APPLICANT The applicant is: owne other Emailc(an.. C."ame �)la)JiCL JoewA7SclJ Address 1.761, 4-J Phone Home AJA Work `%SZ-V7a- 6 5.3 Cell /a-�lC o -636a E-mail Address'�&A-��,A,2sna �M dy` iFax OWNER Name Email (if other than applicant) Address Phone Home Work Fax SURVEYOR/ Name,5A-r ,e - ixk a SIS l r D1 Email C'_ -j ft4,re , zEtv1 ENGINEER Address !$o "1 (-f _R kokh&t A WA4)2A'f-A7 1R J-.-% S53W t Office Phone Qs2 - Y"76 Fax 95-z- V-14- o go y Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, W no. If yes, list dates) of application, action taken, resolution numbers) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred bythe City related to the processing of this application consent to the entry in or upon the premises described! in this application by any authorized official of the Cityof Mound forthe purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining a r moving such s a yin a required bylaw. Applicant Signature Date 2 2-" Owners Signature +�1�_ Date �/7 7 d Waiver of Platting Information sgpr' (10119/2018) Page 4 of 4 t.1 J� PROPERTY ADDRESS: OWNER'S NAME: SATHRE-BERGQUIST9 INC. 150 S. Broadway Ave, Wayzata, MN 55391 Tele: 952-476-6000 Fax: 952-476-0104 Web: www.Sathre.com PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS Parcel 1 (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) JOB # 42574-001 LOT AREA: 6,340 LOT AREA: LENGTH HOUSE x x DETACHED BUILDINGS x (GARAGE/SHED) x x DRIVEWAY, SIDEWALK, x CONC, BITUMINOUS x x x RETAINING WALLS x x DECKS x x 1754 Shorewood Lane Dan Johnson SQ. FT. x 30% = SQ. FT. x 40% = WIDTH TOTAL IIARDCOVERAMPERVIOUS SURFACE UNDER/OVER (INDICATE DIFFERENCE) (FOR ALL LOTS).......... 1,902 sq.ft (FOR LOTS OF RECORD) 2,536 sq.ft AREA COMMENTS = 2065 S.F. House = 60 S.F. Stoop = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. = 323 S.F. Driveway (461 *70%) = 28 S.F. Sidewalk = S.F. = S.F. = S.F = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. ..................................... 2,476 ..................................... 574 sq ft (3051o) -60 sq ft (40%) DATE: 1/6/2020 PROPERTY ADDRESS: OWNER'S NAME: SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 S. Broadway Ave, Wayzata, MN 55391 Tele: 952-476-6000 Fax: 952-476-0104 Web: www.Sathre.com PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS Parcel 2 (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) 1754 Shorewood Lane Dan Johnson JOB # 42574-001 LOT AREA: 14,770 SQ. FT. x 30% = (FOR ALL LOTS).......... 4,431 sq.ft. LOT AREA: SQ. FT. x 40% = (FOR LOTS OF RECORD) 5,908 sq.ft. LENGTH WIDTH AREA COMMENTS HOUSE MISC. x MISC. = 2603 S.F. Existing House x = S.F. DETACHED BUILDINGS x = S.F. (GARAGE/SHED) x = S.F. x = S.F. DRIVEWAY, SIDEWALK, MISC. x MISC. = 543 S.F. Driveway CONC, BITUMINOUS MISC. x MISC. = 168 S.F. Front Sidewalk MISC. x MISC. = 89 S.F. Rear Sidewalk MISC. x MISC. = 569 S.F. Rear Patio RETAINING WALLS MISC. x MISC. = 166 S.F. Existing Ret. Walls x = S.F. DECKS x = S.F. Deck over patio not included x = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVERIIMPERVIOUS SURFACE ..................................... 4,138 UNDER/OVER (INDICATE DIFFERENCE) ..................................... -293 sq ft (30% -1,770 sq ft (40%) DATE: 1/2/2020 -309- :n s` 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, evard, Mound MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 Application Fee and Escrow Planning Commission Date City Council Date VARIANCE N c :_.►� red ime of application. Case No. 1. Has an appucatlon evcl uul iI II1— lv /�i ,....y, ••- - -- -- for this property? Yes ( ) No YV. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, U - Scrf-g Variance Information -310- (1/4/2019) 310-(1/4/2019) Page 4 of 6 of stories, type of use, rjttdD Y a lT VI wJ oe L`� �~' wt s3 SUBJECT Address / 6R� PROPERTY / Block 3 LEGAL Lot DESC. Subdivision PID # ZoninAfFloR2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) �0AR1/E L JcsN%`Sa"' Email jaAlojnsc) 44PM61Sr PROPERTY Name OWNER /7-'K J� {oul� Address ,S/agRtwoo� MogI(C(.712 rr -YG6.-630 o Work 1152--�7L - beS3 Fax 'PS Z- ��2- " Phone Home 1 Z APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER Address THAN OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax o nnnriifinnnl ucp nprmit- or other zoninq procedure 1. Has an appucatlon evcl uul iI II1— lv /�i ,....y, ••- - -- -- for this property? Yes ( ) No YV. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, U - Scrf-g Variance Information -310- (1/4/2019) 310-(1/4/2019) Page 4 of 6 of stories, type of use, Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply Vith all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes VQ No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED Front Yard: (N S W) ZD ft. Side Yard: & EW) rF /D ft.0 Side Yard: (N©E W) _� ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. Lakeside: (N SOW) SD ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. Street Frontage: 20 ft. Lot Size: sq ft _(R 00sq ft Hardcover: �, 573 4 --sq ft REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) 26 ft. ft. 6 ft. I ft. ? (o ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. 20 ft. ft. sq ft sq ft .21 q7( sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (x), No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: AcC'C'f2/)/NC 1-0 c4�(71 �xr ioc c.oT of 2a-coQ9,-IMPERy/o"S CayCR_A-6- M,-rye6 OSP i7�A /`fin Std �o w r7/l S/A� )6+46 S'ET,&ACI<s o F 61 /f s�rs2��Tue� co.��.�/,mss �► Go*P_,*6c Variance Information (1/4/2019) Page 5 of 6 -311 - Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes X, No ( ). If yes, explain: 13oAT AJAc x i B,eaR6tZry psis sqAAC"iyJTo /4 J L 4Nb ,A C, /,/or-�EVE2 -r14a DAf R 6as ceeenJrzE e? AS Sucj4. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes I< No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by laW. 17 Owner's Applican Variance Information (1/4/2019) Page 6 of 6 -312- be Date / ZD 2� J Date Z-0 This information sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein. However, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 952-472-0607. General Zoning Information Sheet R -1A Zoning District — Single Family Residential PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS — Lot Area Lot Width and Setback Requirements (v)0e> Minimum Lot Area eMinimum Lot Area (lakeshoe)ore6, . ... Square Feet /-�J(}10,000 Square Feet CGL��;JG Minimum Lot Width (non-lakeshore)................................................................40 Feet 50 Feet V Minimum Lot Width (lakeshore)...................................................................... FrontYard Setback....................................................................................... 20 Feet ✓ SideYard Setback........................................................................................10 Feet RearYard Setback.........................................................................................15 Feet MinimumLot Depth.........................................................................................80 Feet Feet i, Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback...........................................................50 Minimum Building Floor Area Requirement.............................................840 Square Feet 'Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 40 FT, except that lots fronting on a cul-de- sac shall be 40 FT at the front building setback line (i.e. 20 FT back from front property line). Applicable side/rear setbacks apply to lot lines abutting fire lanes, alleys or unimproved right-of-ways. Building Height. The vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, o e cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. No building shall exceed two and one half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height. LOTS OF RECORD, Special Provisions 02 Corner Lots Lot width Minimum side yard setback 40 - 50 feet 10 feet r— 51 feet or more 20 feet Side Yard Requirements — The required side yard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet. r ide yard setbacks for lots of record shall be six (6) feet unless the structure or site does not ontain a garage in which case, one side yard setback is required to be ten (10) feet to ccommodate a driveway access. HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. On existing lots of record:, impervious coverage may b oPrmitted by a maximum of 40 erp cent providing that techniques are utilized as identified In Section 129-385 (g)(2). Impervious cover Is any surface impervious or resistant to the free flow of water or surface moisture, including all buildings, driveways and parking areas whether paved or not, tennis courts, sidewalks, patios and swimming pools. Open decks (1/4" minimum ooenina between hoarrlc) chap not be counted-iz 313013 This information sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 952-472-0604. �� Shoreland Overlay District cttAA- D Lot Area and Width Regulations Overview 2415 wilshtre Blvd, Mound, MN 55364 in R-1, R-1 a and R-2 Districts Phone 952A72-0607 Fax 952472-0620 The City of Mound has enacted Shoreland Management Regulations to ensure the wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands and public waters. This overview is intended to assist property owners in the development of their R-1, R -la or R-2 zoned parcel. For more information and additional regulations which may apply, please consult Mound City Code, Section 350.1200. Shoreland Management Regulations for dwellings in the R-1, R-1 a and R-2 districts depend on whether the property is a lakeshore lot. A lakeshore lot is "a lot abutting public waters or abutting public lands abutting public waters with the exception of designated parks." If the lot does not fit within that definition, it would be a non-lakeshore lot. The charts below provide the minimum lot area and lot width requirements: R-1 Zoning District for Single Family Detached Dwellings X R -la and R-2 Zoning District for Single Family Detached Dwellings -314- Date: January 30, 2020 To: City of Mound From: Dan Johnson / 4 J's Investments, LLC Re: Re; 1754 Shorewood Lane Following is my submittal of written application narrative for Waiver of Platting and Variance. I own lots 1, 2, 3, and lot 4. There are currently two houses on lots 2, 3, & 4 (One house on lots 2 & 3, and one house on lot 4). My family has owned lot 4 since the early 70's, and I have owned lots 1,2, & 3 since 2005. I currently reside in the house on lot 4 and have family living in the house on lot 2 & 3. I am aware of the progression of buildings and splits since the lots were purchased and developed. Lot 1 that we are dealing with here has never been built on. I wish to split lot 1 off under a Waiver of Platting to its original platting. This lot is unique from most properties on the lake in Mound in that it butts up to a city owned piece of land called "Sunrise Landing." The city property was originally designated as a fire lane. However, once the city installed water and sewer there was no longer a need for the fire lane, and most if not all fire lanes in Mound were converted to commons. All of these parcels are left too with natural vegetation. This parcel was used as a commons until mid 1990s when the city decided to turn the parcel into a full- fledged boat landing. In doing so, the city paved the parcel down into the lake. I am told that because there is a road I need a setback of 10 feet on the side butting up to the property. I have done some investigating and found that city of Mound did NOT get approval from the MN DNR to make this a legal landing. This was confirmed by city managers I talked with. Therefore, there should have never been a paved road installed down into the lake. The DNR controls all landings and what can go in and out of the lake, and right now the DNR does not have this parcel registered as a legal landing. Given this fact, my property should be granted a variance that would allow regular set backs for a lake property under Waiver of Platting which is 6 feet on each side. I appreciate your consideration. Sincerely, Daniel P. Johnson -315- G \ \ INV- E� ^ 9 � V ` 9Sti -7 s TAF \ � F \` 931.9 `% c FT \ \ 7 eol)cg 932.51 r� r\12" 9" 930.8931.8 o5ti o `e / Parcel 1 405. � 6,340 SO FT �e 10" g % \' \ .as�y d \ J'y� �O 6) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject properly we are F m Q (9 of 4 'I 932.8 yN' at O \\ c` m iu Co tY O gag. 6„ / o / hp ,p 9 �� unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State Oae Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution ❑ F w Co O w 0 93 �0. \ /� ' \ �o F c'9 F,p O must be exercise before any excavation takes place on m near this site. Alan, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on F D w Lu Z �S5 I �, r1 l /� \tee, 2� �� the subject property Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. Z N F = 6" 1� A / 1 A I riL 930 3-12" LJ \_JI v v J `� lv LJ / ; '\ �i� �,y a D Z a o 932.3 i� �cP 3'G O O O co tY CA18" Sx 02 �O OZO •O 932.2 �G� J 'P120 F 7� T. g3 T ° 0931.5 ` �. 933 ("�� -932 .� :z� L T 3 9 20' x9 `� v / g3 cwt V`x w� ��. R__ `✓931.8/ 0.A 932.4 x\26" V s 65 I `Pjw Q � / 0932.7 F. _ r TO A s o DT f\28' p05 �,/ L ,o 2 2-32.. vv d32 0.i 1 .SSL 5N % 9 i \ oq 936.2 93g 7 R. 9 ?vo i � A3 / , T 60 0 � � B ` �`. JF'`' 933 `b9V /� 933.4 gS � 932.9 e39o88 X \ ' \' G P C \O e 95Gk 8 35 �� e 933.0 �o 932.8 o3ti AO k ate. °�+ /�/ GO� s �c ° �� a A, 2 e m �! '� A ` �P ze, 939.3 d. ° /^' ° 9�_ ° ° °Ob d AOS `� C \ \ g°j ,S;y°J ,SP. �P \ T L i' ° a �A T' 9e �° �e ° x° s a 6 / 9 e° o a * e b V'GI °'VER' O \ \\ d 9 9 ♦ ' x \ ,9 / GTE- \5' l )93 ,' �'S �n P ° p R/S xi x 9343 S� / / �./ 9344 PROPOSED LOT INFORMATION ZONING/SETBACICS R-lA (One Family Residence) Lot Width: Lot Depth: Area: Hardcover %: Street Setback: 20 feet Side Setback: 6 feet Lake Setback: 50 feet LOT AREA INFORMATION Parcel l: Area: 6,340 111 acres Hardcover Parcel 2: Area: 14,770 sq.fL/0.339 acres Hardcover: \ F� ,�, Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 3, SHADYWOOD POINT, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN, according to the recorded plat thereof. Parcel 2: Lot 2, and those parts of Lots 3 and 4, lying northwesterly of a line described as commencing at the most southerly comer of said Lot 3; thence 943.2 gq3 s / a ° ' s o Northwesterly 10.5 feet along the southwesterly line of said Lot 3 to the actual point of beginning; thence deflecting 92 degrees 51 minutes to the northeasterly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, all in Block 3, SHADYWOOD POINT, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN, according to the recorded plat thereof. \ �i GTE- x° °° a / e \ 944.3 o \ 0 ° ° 0 934.4 O 8 ° ° �� Parcel 2 9402940.3 ,O° 9 \ ° 14,770 SQ FT \ �° \\\" 0 .'ate ° � x935.3 to On x 934.6 .cry °s °G NH= •vO ° 42.80.. ° o ° x 9�y'li / / R, J\ a FFE'-' a ° C)N 9 6' .� n \ K I O x gd\ CURB ° CCS* RE m 9 ° \ \ \ X93 \ 942.6 944.4 08n �� 936.6 'i Q NORTHEASTERLY ---- r 0 � � I � � x x 936.3 � \ � \ \ LINE LOT 4 SMH Ua �. S Rim 941. x 937.1 is' t �' X942-- Inv -928.5 �, V� L_� v \ N �I }9 0� e G 9S 5\ gSa6-93a�8` � N� OF O 7 a44.1 )'VO j �� SOOA A R 6 / A r992F 9SS� Fated \ E OF LO Bearings are based on the Hennepin County / >�, f s g3'I : I �94 ^ N V\N Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 943.2 10 5 0 5 10 20 940.2 x \0463 ttf �Ar ti Q 0 ao C� Gdo SCALE INFEET m \x 942.4 Gr � \ x 92 S3�„ OGZ 3 NER rco ,S�, Q/ 94.2 9gnn LAGOS �OG FE= EyJS 944.8 'A, p 4 A g443 9 4.6 i J J PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION ,l nia 2., POWER POLE FEE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED }0 w GUY WIRE GTE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION "."o i4R' Ire reo V TOE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. Lots 1 and 2, and those parts of Lots 3 and 4, lying northwesterly of a line described as commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 3; thence Northwesterly 10.5 feet along the J O z � LIFT STATION J Lu U LOWEST OPENING ELEV. ( CHISELED X MONUMENT FOUND SANITARY MANHOLE 0 CONCRETE southwesterly line of said Lot 3 to the actual point of beginning; thence deflecting 92 degrees 51 minutes to the northeasterly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, all in Block 3, Q I 0 BITUMINOUS O sT STORM MANHOLE A BUILDING SETBACK LINE SHADYWOOD POINT W a j IL N a CABLE TV z ® I 0 CONCRETE CURB E SURVEY CONTROL POINT aJ O FLARED END SECTION Z _ CONTOUR EXISTING = y 9 CABLE TV PEDESTAL STANDARD NOTESj w 0 Ww ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER Z TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED M A A ELECTRIC MANHOLE 1) Site Address: 1754 Shorewood Lane, Mound, Minnesota 55364 Lu U) ❑2 P w w K W N O D 7 a W w TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- E I ELECTRIC OUTLET a_b)_ T5 TO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND 5 YARD LIGHT O UTILITY MANHOLE cns GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE 2) Flood Zane Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by m y orlu Q ur M UTILITY VAULT rVVVVVI TREE LINE FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP the 1 -percent -annual -chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are shown at 931.1 feet) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel D y > z O w WATER METER » STORM SEWER FUEL PUMP No. 27053CO284F, effective date of November 4th, 2016. W w 0 Z TEL w o = Y 5 WELL RETAINING WALL PROPANE TANK 3) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 2 1, 100 s.f. t - 0.484 acres t (area as measured to Ordinary High Water line) Oz= Z ~ y UTL a W ur ❑ W CURB STOP WATERMAIN 1j GAS VALVE 4) Benckmark: Elevations are based on Hennepin County Geodetic Station Name: MOUND which has an elevation of: 937.594 feet (NGVD29). F -pZ 6 O ❑ Co W p W U _Ln W HYDRANT TITIN -r-r7 RAILROAD TRACKS GENERATOR Inv J D $ Q Z - ary POST INDICATOR VALVE C- RAILROAD SWITCH 1] HAND HOLE 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is R-lA (Single Family Residential) per the City of Mound's zoning map dated January 30, 2012. The setback, Z Q Lu == � OF SATELLITE DISH MAIL BOX [sel SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Z w _ Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 20 feet (Shorewood Lane)W - I a w o r Side: 10 feet, 6 feet for lots o£record 7a 3 = F e e 0 Rear: 15 feet Cn Co w o It- O Qo o tea` Lake: 50 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) 7C►�+ Z it it Q W Z O� °� Height: 35 feet m 2 12 stories U W j w Z ` O� Hardcover: 30 percent of lot area, 40 percent for lots of record p '". w N U F W D Z- Ir Ly A y Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning °C� Q F - CJ W y F y m 3 LU 3 LU 3 W Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified all parties involved in the design P g by P !Pi z z Co O- w w w w and planning process. 0,97, 0 - O Lw W Co MID: D Z (Y J 10" g % \' \ .as�y d \ J'y� �O 6) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject properly we are F m Q (9 of 4 'I 932.8 yN' at O \\ c` m iu Co tY O gag. 6„ / o / hp ,p 9 �� unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State Oae Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution ❑ F w Co O w 0 93 �0. \ /� ' \ �o F c'9 F,p O must be exercise before any excavation takes place on m near this site. Alan, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on F D w Lu Z �S5 I �, r1 l /� \tee, 2� �� the subject property Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. Z N F = 6" 1� A / 1 A I riL 930 3-12" LJ \_JI v v J `� lv LJ / ; '\ �i� �,y a D Z a o 932.3 i� �cP 3'G O O O co tY CA18" Sx 02 �O OZO •O 932.2 �G� J 'P120 F 7� T. g3 T ° 0931.5 ` �. 933 ("�� -932 .� :z� L T 3 9 20' x9 `� v / g3 cwt V`x w� ��. R__ `✓931.8/ 0.A 932.4 x\26" V s 65 I `Pjw Q � / 0932.7 F. _ r TO A s o DT f\28' p05 �,/ L ,o 2 2-32.. vv d32 0.i 1 .SSL 5N % 9 i \ oq 936.2 93g 7 R. 9 ?vo i � A3 / , T 60 0 � � B ` �`. JF'`' 933 `b9V /� 933.4 gS � 932.9 e39o88 X \ ' \' G P C \O e 95Gk 8 35 �� e 933.0 �o 932.8 o3ti AO k ate. °�+ /�/ GO� s �c ° �� a A, 2 e m �! '� A ` �P ze, 939.3 d. ° /^' ° 9�_ ° ° °Ob d AOS `� C \ \ g°j ,S;y°J ,SP. �P \ T L i' ° a �A T' 9e �° �e ° x° s a 6 / 9 e° o a * e b V'GI °'VER' O \ \\ d 9 9 ♦ ' x \ ,9 / GTE- \5' l )93 ,' �'S �n P ° p R/S xi x 9343 S� / / �./ 9344 PROPOSED LOT INFORMATION ZONING/SETBACICS R-lA (One Family Residence) Lot Width: Lot Depth: Area: Hardcover %: Street Setback: 20 feet Side Setback: 6 feet Lake Setback: 50 feet LOT AREA INFORMATION Parcel l: Area: 6,340 111 acres Hardcover Parcel 2: Area: 14,770 sq.fL/0.339 acres Hardcover: \ F� ,�, Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 3, SHADYWOOD POINT, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN, according to the recorded plat thereof. Parcel 2: Lot 2, and those parts of Lots 3 and 4, lying northwesterly of a line described as commencing at the most southerly comer of said Lot 3; thence 943.2 gq3 s / a ° ' s o Northwesterly 10.5 feet along the southwesterly line of said Lot 3 to the actual point of beginning; thence deflecting 92 degrees 51 minutes to the northeasterly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, all in Block 3, SHADYWOOD POINT, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN, according to the recorded plat thereof. \ �i GTE- x° °° a / e \ 944.3 o \ 0 ° ° 0 934.4 O 8 ° ° �� Parcel 2 9402940.3 ,O° 9 \ ° 14,770 SQ FT \ �° \\\" 0 .'ate ° � x935.3 to On x 934.6 .cry °s °G NH= •vO ° 42.80.. ° o ° x 9�y'li / / R, J\ a FFE'-' a ° C)N 9 6' .� n \ K I O x gd\ CURB ° CCS* RE m 9 ° \ \ \ X93 \ 942.6 944.4 08n �� 936.6 'i Q NORTHEASTERLY ---- r 0 � � I � � x x 936.3 � \ � \ \ LINE LOT 4 SMH Ua �. S Rim 941. x 937.1 is' t �' X942-- Inv -928.5 �, V� L_� v \ N �I }9 0� e G 9S 5\ gSa6-93a�8` � N� OF O 7 a44.1 )'VO j �� SOOA A R 6 / A r992F 9SS� Fated \ E OF LO Bearings are based on the Hennepin County / >�, f s g3'I : I �94 ^ N V\N Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 943.2 10 5 0 5 10 20 940.2 x \0463 ttf �Ar ti Q 0 ao C� Gdo SCALE INFEET m \x 942.4 Gr � \ x 92 S3�„ OGZ 3 NER rco ,S�, Q/ 94.2 9gnn LAGOS �OG FE= EyJS 944.8 'A, p 4 A g443 9 4.6 i DEVELOPER Dan Johnson 1754 Shorewood Lane Mound, MN 55364 Tel: 612-860-0300 Email: danjobnson@mchsi.com ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR Satbre-Berguqist, Inc. 150 Broadway Ave. S. Wayzata, MN 55391 Engineer: Dan Schmidt Email:Schmidt@satbre.eom Land Surveyor: David Pemberton Email: Pemberton@sathre.com Tel: 952-476-6000 SURVEY LEGEND 0) CAST IRON MONUMENT © PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION ,l nia 2., POWER POLE FEE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GTE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION "."o i4R' Ire reo V TOE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CHISELED X MONUMENT SET Ls LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. ( CHISELED X MONUMENT FOUND SANITARY MANHOLE 0 CONCRETE P Q I 0 BITUMINOUS PK NAIL MONUMENT SET sT STORM MANHOLE A BUILDING SETBACK LINE PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® N N CABLE TV \ ® I 0 CONCRETE CURB E SURVEY CONTROL POINT Q FLARED END SECTION ' 96o _ CONTOUR EXISTING A/C UNIT y 9 CABLE TV PEDESTAL TI s TREE DECIDUOUS -- C ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER �DR4^sN �: TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED M A A ELECTRIC MANHOLE %� /7 % IL iE I� �� ' TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED P L ELECTRIC METER " /1 - TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- E I ELECTRIC OUTLET a_b)_ TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND 5 YARD LIGHT O UTILITY MANHOLE DEVELOPER Dan Johnson 1754 Shorewood Lane Mound, MN 55364 Tel: 612-860-0300 Email: danjobnson@mchsi.com ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR Satbre-Berguqist, Inc. 150 Broadway Ave. S. Wayzata, MN 55391 Engineer: Dan Schmidt Email:Schmidt@satbre.eom Land Surveyor: David Pemberton Email: Pemberton@sathre.com Tel: 952-476-6000 SURVEY LEGEND 0) CAST IRON MONUMENT © PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION ) IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET 2., POWER POLE FEE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GTE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION ( DRILL HOLE FOUND reo ROOF DRAIN TOE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CHISELED X MONUMENT SET Ls LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. ( CHISELED X MONUMENT FOUND SANITARY MANHOLE 0 CONCRETE k REBAR MONUMENT FOUND Q SANITARY CLEANOUT 0 BITUMINOUS PK NAIL MONUMENT SET sT STORM MANHOLE A BUILDING SETBACK LINE PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV ) PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN Hennepin County CONCRETE CURB E SURVEY CONTROL POINT Q FLARED END SECTION ' 96o _ CONTOUR EXISTING A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED CABLE TV PEDESTAL i TREE DECIDUOUS -- GUARD RAIL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT DRAIN TILE ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC METER OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- FENCE I ELECTRIC OUTLET I] TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND 5 YARD LIGHT O UTILITY MANHOLE cns GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE 0 UTILITY PEDESTAL orlu OVERHEAD UTILITY FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE M UTILITY VAULT rVVVVVI TREE LINE FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP W) WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER ' FLAG POLE ® WATER METER » STORM SEWER FUEL PUMP -0- WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ] FUEL TANK 0 WELL RETAINING WALL PROPANE TANK Mw MONITORING WELL UTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND GAS METER m CURB STOP WATERMAIN 1j GAS VALVE D4 GATE VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL �) GAS MANHOLE �O' HYDRANT TITIN -r-r7 RAILROAD TRACKS GENERATOR Inv IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL GUARD POST ary POST INDICATOR VALVE C- RAILROAD SWITCH 1] HAND HOLE SIGN SATELLITE DISH MAIL BOX [sel SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN Z OF W iunIn alLLIO OD W Q m In V@O to Q; U 03 a 9O~ fLJY ZZ K W= O N DaaXX CU O Zab O v 10"M CA /F/_'� VJ M N (meq/ Z V 1� CD q`~ V 3: � O W O 1 LU z� �y L=L m 2 ~ �FFFOLLLL{{{{ a s J�00iks A.> A 1--1 U 1 h--1 CU O Zab v N /F/_'� VJ M N (meq/ Z V 1� CD q`~ W 3: m 1 LU O ¢U �y L=L m 2 ~ Q 7 U) ''�CO ^ VJ s J�00iks A.> *t a �1VZWN3 DSSNCG T W P:117- RG E.24 -S E C.13 Project City: Mound Hennepin County FILE NO.: 42574-001 Sheet 1 of 1 ��"-.;-� 4 `fes' - _. . +. y�i .. -- __ F' _ � - .�rrr .• rc . w�r..r-?iw..w ` a�' a '�^E F � ''R ._ �.. 4 F"A.y Search By Pian Number Page 1 of 7 -318- -- J JOW Page 1 of 7 -318- Second Louver Levef F�RST FLOOR GUEST GARAGE 1'6"X11' 22' XO UP.... - ... . �I�a� DOWN 13'2"X5i J L 17 _. XITCHEN _ LIVING 13'6"X9'4"_ . ROOPh 19'6'X20,9" DINING 13'X9' DECK AREA MWN LEVEL FLOOR SECOND FLOOR RaC-XSz-b -319- 1/3/20, 2:55 PM Page 2 of 7 GUEST 13 DESK -14'8-XI2' -ATH LOF" A;REA V1,11— BATH �1-t AREA OPEN TO BELOW IRASTER SUITE 1111.,"X X2.5._ UPPER LEVEL FLOOR LOWER LEVEL - 320 - 1/3120, 2:55 PM Page 3 of 7 -MIECHISTORAGE 154.. X 13' STORAGE p2rJC'p-5 -b UP STORAGE UNFINISHED BASEMENT 24'1 ? "X 22'6" UNFINISHED 12'5" X 14'4" c� w r COVERED t. r PORCH CANTILEVER ABOVE BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR ALL PRICES NOTED BELOW ARE IN US DOLLARS PIAN DETAILS 2354 Total Heated Square Feet 1st Floor: 1264 2nd Floor: 1090 Width: !Ol50" Depth: 9L43P' 4 BedroAms 4 Full Baths 2 -Car Garage 2 -Car Attached. Front Entry Size: 22'-0" xxc4Fe" 22,.' Standard Foundation: Walkout Basement Exterior Wall Framing: 2" x 6" CAD Package $1300.00 Right Reading Reverse $100 Reproducible Master $1100.00 Additional Sets $50 PDF File Format (recommended) $1300.00 What t than artiar Do I Nev-d't 5 -Set Package (minimum construction -321 - 1(3120, 2:55 PM Page 4 of 7 t IM CL W a a° r 0 0 0 11 0 '' o 1 o 0 0 o 0 1 ^ o i! l i^ U J 0 af> m Q �1 a 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �I 0 0 i� LLI o a > n. 0 11 0 '' o 1 o 0 0 o 0 1 ^ o W l i^ U J 0 af> m Q �1 a 0 ❑ 0 a W V U Q 0 0 o LLI o a > n. I I l li I� itI r I1 j U a OfujO z U F Z U d 4 w { ! o > U UEL a ! cn to I- V O N O X LL � o ca J ¢ LL ofJ U LL m o D a cn � U J a a0 w j o O U) :5Q io Q U) U U) Q F LL o W O w o a m 0 o m J LL Q > m a -i -jo C) 0 u� I 0 IILL o a ¢ a m � � w o i N I o m w � 0 o ro o m o m r ('7 -j Y J w X f W O Y w Z F- w � W w � w W y M LL U) O F Z J O z 2 2 In W 2 O C:)a m C14 2 O EL a ¢ LL a a a a O N O0 V' c) v O o u i io 04 N N ri N Lii V O 6 o6 N E T � ON N O N N O N 0 N O N 0 - N N O o NN I, O N O O N O N Cl N O N O N O N O N O O N N O O N N T °' 04 04 C-4 C14 C4 O f0 O O O O O O 0 0 o O o a C L w o n O O o .- O o a N O o n N O o O Cl) O 0 rn V O O M o O o 0 N O 0 n m I )P), Lr)O O O 0 O Z c d 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 f0 0 6 -O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 I 0 0 0C11 0 0 0 1 ^ o W i^ U J 0 af> m Q w a 0 ❑ 0 a W V U Q 0 0 o LLI o a > n. I I l li I� itI r 1 LL W U J 0 af> m Q w a U ~O U a W V U Q CID O LLI o a > n. Q i I I1 j U OfujO U 4 { ! o 10- a >a N 00 O N M Q d' N N N UN N 0 N N04 0 o a0 O � O to O M n O N o0 O U N j 0 0 0 ~� Q 0 0 0 O� z Z zz W y W WC Co w SC) :.3 ❑ D ❑ Q O 1 0 ❑ O ❑ 0 0 zz z Z z z z z z Z z z w O O O O O O - O O O O O O V 2 2 2 2 �E l l I I 2 2 2 :5 2 I i z o z LL �,' W W m Z - O j a U w z a U i I w z Q j m F U W J F m (n � C) m U LL U ., J Q a' D LL W J �] o LL W - Z : J Q it z U LL 00 o LL a LLU U IL 4)F 4 j O F J a W Q Of a Ij J a a O J r U F 2' U U p O m j m Q @ O > I > p! z O 4 O C W W F r W j N N > Z N m K U W w ul d Z Q p (wi U � `N w LL Q D O p > z I. 4"., z rn w z Z zz W 0 N N C J y W y W WC Co w SC) I Q (n 1 W U = I. N W W U 7 ~ Z w �" U �-•I Fw LL D W W m Z - O j a > U O a U Q U m F U W J F m (n � m U LL U ., J Q a' D LL W J �] (D Z LL W - Z : J Q O U LL 00 LL LL a LLU 4)F O O F J a W F F - (n J a J O J r U F 2' U U U j Q @ Q Q W W W r W W N N > Z N m U W w Z Q � p U w `N d Q D O p a(a (� (� (� a) rn w (n w rn (� LL w D w O w FL co i i J J L z Q w w w W W J r Wm K w w HI m J Z Z ZU {- Z w U U F m I' w w I.: O W W W Q J w w W tq LLW. O Om J U z _ F F H _ _ = 0O w Q O Q Q (� U 00 Z 07 '.. m a g g d Q CL a Q Q i a a a LL a a 0- a a a Q W N N N N O O I d' O CO Cl) O Cl) .� a I ' N V' V j N .. �. N O M O �- _ (� O in ��, O (O d: In W C� M C] 41 O o O O 1 o O O O o O O o Cl O O O �� O pCV E J N O N N O N N I. O N N O N N O N N O N N O N O N j O N O N I; O N O N O N O N O N O N ( O •Q� o o 0 0 0 0 o O !I o a O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N lqo 07 00 j N O N IT h O M I N t0 f� I c' O L 'Q 00 O 00 O O O M r' O O i. O O N Z 4% O O O O O O O O O `ay O O O O O O O O O O -' O O N O O O I N O O O O O O N r O O O `� r O ! O O CD O O O O i O I O O O O O O O O O F� p Q 4) M w w w a - 33- a Icq a' I a' O v 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 cI� l I O 0 � 0 I ! 0 I 1 I I 0 1 U f! 2 2 2 .3 D p p p ❑ I Ii 2 � � 2 i2 0 co cuW l O 0 � 0 I ! 0 I 1 I I 0 2 2 2 W I Ii o Z , ¢ ! p I w U) 0 co cuW I , I Z - w . w W y ¢ J WI d ' w z i W O w O j� d Q - F->- W CO w Lw d U U U I. 0 } Ix 2 F U WJ W H W WIx Q W Q a > > U nW a o o w axi a (- O O m 1 0 p LL � o m COJ J Z) IL _ IL O W ~ -LO IL W Z � U WE ~ m U D o Z =o p p g v o v o W ¢ w r N W ¢ w - W' Q ( D Q ! rn W U W U U U p m tNo Di d U U LL U p }9 ai Q OJ ai w `° � ¢ w CO) LLO I o (D o o 1 Jp Ij p J m m I'. p J Z m J - m w w m in W 2i m J Z J W W '.. p W w J w Z U W' W p U 10 wQ cr x p O W' w p z ¢ J p ¢ fn Z W 20 2 �,, W N YZ) 2 ¢ 2 Q Z Y 2 Z W 0 x w ¢ Q o ¢ ¢ } o m g U U ( _ (D m U J 0 U 2 2 J U ¢ m a - a a a W Q ¢ ¢ a a WW Q W O m N N j V M N N OM V O l(7 ! N O O `- N O N M LO�. m O Cl) E O N j O N O N Cl N O N - O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N ` 0 N o N O N o N 0 N o N O N O N O N- o N O N Cl N O N o N 0 N 0 N y (0 c0 (0 c0 (O (0 (0 n h n n n n 1 W N O O O O O O O O O O O O O j O O O D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 { o 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 N i n 0) N n o j N M n N tD n M n in v v� �n tD m n m o0 0o m rn rn m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d o - 0 ! 00 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o ! o o 0 o 0 o y o N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N o ! N N N N N N N v 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 34 -' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co cuW 3 ❑❑ ❑ C)❑ ❑ I' ❑ ❑ - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I ❑ ❑ ❑ C) C)z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z _1 1 Z Z Z Z Z z O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O U 2 2 2i : : :-5 2 : 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 : :2 Z w �- w i W � 1 Z LU j '! OU I Q z w I� plz Q CL w ❑ y m ¢ O ❑ z z C of O w a nf x y m W aLL U) ~ m m I w d Y Q of zF- OU OU Y > J W W C - 2 W W C Of U o y a 0 O cxi w? U z w a m a w ❑ ❑ ca LL W co oU "_ z U z (o U a U m F- U LL O LL m O _ o J w OU w m m m w O Q w O cUn a F J ❑ F U ? a w H J � Z U U _ t0 Ul U2 j - 0 U U cUO a = -❑ �� o o cn J o 0 g ¢ w w J H N R' '1. O F W Q J w O w Q �F z z Q > a wZ f c m 67 0 (_ != l= W W U) :2- a (� (00 (O U ❑ ❑ (n IL J J Q I Z J 'J cd m Z m _ O Z Z m m m ❑ m - m m ❑ W J W � J J W W ? � W W W W W ' U ', U Z ❑ z U U I Z U U U z I H ✓� w O 2 a :� O 0J x a a = O 0 z a 2 O O x : 0 2 O : O z ¢ F U U to x m U U U U) U U U a it j m �I< i, a a a Q n d a ¢ ¢ a Q Q Q w a a Cl) N 00 O V r - (fl (O co M O N M Lf)r O M .0 M N O O O Cl) Cl) M N (n o O o O o o .N- O N O V O N O of O N O O o O O o O o o U fV E i N O N Cl N N O N 1 N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N Cl N N Cl N N O N N O - N N O N .Q0 d N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 3N a o 0 o �! N ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o O I (f1 O (O < N M O r O M 00 O (O (O (D N c Q7 y N N N N N N N N V N N N (O N N C, N N N N N N (G N N N N N W N o M Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 L C j 4! o 0 0 0 Cl o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 p Ui o N o N o N o N 0 N 0 N 0 0 N 0 o N 0 N 0 N 0 N o N o N 0 N o N a (c� j o 0 0 0 0 0 �' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 1 � 0 O � 2 2 2i l 0 0 'i 0 0 0 tI 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z 1 2 :�i I :E I :�i :2 O Z D O 2 i 00 I i I O a O N O � O I o i U O I, j i Z I. O O 7 I O 1 LLI I w d I dU I W { Z w j F U U) I F I m U 0 LLI .. m LL d a O I F>-- � a F F O 0 W z Q 2 w � a W « O m O Z W O Z O w J p 0 2 U I p 0 a O D LL a0 O U Z •. LL m U Q_ m w Z 2 LL d Y w a : j LLO CL 0�U c) F a Q O _ J pZ Q U j U m U p Z p N U n m g o Q o o Q j w <`! o w 2 aW+ I Uw m F W OU I CO (n d m(n d Q N' ❑ U) w O u1 a U) U)o o ¢ m LL LLO i ILLIi I � Ili LU p ; = J J J J J J z J LL co m m m Z m m J m J J 0 F m W W W J W W m W m CO w J Z W U U z U U U F w z m p U w w w w w w > W a' -' a w fY I z � � H 2 m F W w N O O = O O ¢ O ¢ J 2 = 2 O U U U U m � m F F U x Q F g g g g a a m a a 2 a a ¢ ¢ ¢ a a a Q i N r M M O O V co V V0) M a0 m N 1� LbO 'cF M . O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O E N Cl N N Co N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N Cl N �2 �2 .M- Cl) �2 _ O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 n <o m n m Lo m v o to M ao 00 h .- O O O N N Cl) M Cl) V' V V IA IA to M M M M M Cl) M M M Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) M M O M Z O O O O O O O O o O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O o N O N O N o N OO N N O N O o N o O N O N O N O N O ! N O N O N c� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 36 - 0 0 0 0 o o o a O N O � O I! I� I 1 it 1 Ia I , U I ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z 0 Z ❑ Z in Z O Z O I Z I O.� Z 0 Z O Z O Z j O Z 1 ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ O ❑ O 7 O ❑ O 7 O Z)0 O O 0 O I > O > O 7 O 0 O 00 I O O n O ❑ O 0 O U :5 2 2 2 2 2 2 j Z. 2 2 2 2 :2 II F Z f w U) I w LY k, W 0 i Z O I > Q LLI ❑ W — � ! Q < d O 7 O Y U Y U ry � 0 J W W W O U W m o yr C! ¢ H Q J U w U w co a - U' Z LL WJ 0 w d W z O U LLL Q F O w O � to _ J U U ? XLL > 2 2 U w g F Z U K f > _O w J LL : � 0 a� ..] 0 2 w m 0 to a O 0 LL O LUL O LL O LL O 0 F O z co LL O � to m n J U J � U (Un � U 0 2i Y W K U lA ¢ Q U_ m i (p w LL U _ U Of U d O Z I. U OU J J F- ¢ ❑ a Z ¢ N N W w O (n U U T T U U tY U) C) w a) CD W_ w j L Z J ❑ Z J ❑ m m w ❑ O m LU o o m w c] w > J J x m U n z ❑ w x a' ❑ o J LY J I� z ❑ af I W W W 0 W ZO I .. d F J Z Y W w Z J 0 a W Z O a O J Q U Q U x F > a m ! J z O WW ❑ ¢ J J > > O -� i W N L a fa N ¢ a a a a a a ¢ ¢ ¢ a a 2 a a a a ¢ .� 1; C) O h M co LO r c t M tXW V' r Lr - M to a0 00 ¢ E C04 N o N o N O N O N O N O N o N O N O N o N o N o N O N o N o N o N U CV Cl N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N :3 CN d v v v v Lo L co co co co co co co r- w 4 0 D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q o is o 1. 0 0 0 0 0 (no I I 'L N to o to I N to V I-- ! Of O o 'V 1 N o 'V' OI ! O V M i .. V' N d' LO N co N [t ; o M It r Cl) d' t0 b � N ~ a' r Z M o Cl) 0 Cl) 0 M o 0 M j- o 0 o 0 o o o o O o o o o i o 0 o 0 - o M o o o o o o o i ~ p 61 o o C4 0 O C14 0 O 04 o C11 o 04 o C11 t7 cq I OoW N cq o O o o O O O O a V o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 ' p ❑ o 0 0 o p o p p o o o o a o z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z w j O O O O OU O O O O O O O O O O O 2 2 � i 2 2 2 2 2 1 :2 M 2 i 2 2 i i � i I W a o a Z O - W f W ° N a W d U v U O z p w 0 o U w m a0 d a a a W J Q 1 :E 'f a W J d a U J U U I a J =� U), j 'i > ;I O 2 W S . O ; U ° a0 > 0 Q W co W4) F- Q <Q U LLm O Q ` In a Z O ° F O � � +°� (1)Uau ' a W �' W °z Q O rn p W J ° OJ w ° m � o a U > �nU 2 a - � J �_ W :. U J f_A fn �_ o d' !n J � (O ice+ U) a a 2 p W a Q rG (O U a 2 p O 0 0 _ 0 I 0 p tr ofz W Z)J 00 Z ° U Z W p ~ p W p p o K m W W �_ a > W � - > Z ° O U Z S W m � z a Z w ¢ ¢ J p a p wa w a Q U w z > m U C7 � I J 7 1 a a a a a a a a a ¢ ¢ a a a a a N N 0 O N N N V N M W m V p _ O I� aU N_ � c0 00 � N N O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O E N C. N 0 N o N O N O N o N 0 N C N 0 N o N O N O N o N 0 N 0 N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1 it O o 0 'll 0 0 r 0 ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O f O N O O �- h '. N Lo 01 O . �o r d1 O Lr) Ql O tf)Iff N In N LO N N N N N to to N O .Q Z O O O O O O O O � O O O O O O O O O O O O .� O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O - O O O N O N O N O O N O � N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N N I N N N L) 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0- 3$8 T o 0 0 o o 0 0 6I :� I I i Z Z z z z Z O O O O O O O ❑ t it in t. z z z z z z zO O OO� ��l � 0 a1 a cli O ❑ � ❑ J ❑ ❑ it in ❑ ❑ LO 0] W I I J �. ❑ m W Z { C P: U II J w 0 a1 a ❑ � ❑ J ❑ ❑ it in ❑ ❑ ". 0] W ! ❑ w J �. ❑ m W Z W J J w ❑ ❑ x W K I'' w w O a ''. Z Y a W p W W � �' W W uwi Z F Q' W J w - g I J LL ❑ O ❑ a J U ' U U O U !. U a m O U S h 0 ! U w 00 W W O - a a +�+ w O w x x J x w I w a- G ❑ U < LL ❑ ", LLL lai p LLL lLL LLQ.. a G a Q : W ! W W U Fa- W W : W X a+ LL a X a LL I' ¢ a - U Z M a ¢ a W W ( a CL aLO W o Q' CC W M co O LOto M N N O rl- LL O M O 00 V LL U O V (O U U L U O O n U O O LL V U : U U U U J U J U U U U U U Q O U U U U J U m z U U U U C. N to ❑ 0 N 0 N U �' o N Cl N UN I ` d O N Q Oi ! N O I' N ❑ O : N N O N N {' O _ N ; (� O �, N (� O N N o N N O N M O N M O N M OI N : co O N { M O N co ,Qp a N O I j W l j Q-' ca l j I j Gc O w a O i O O O O o O O O O O O O O C\ O\ N U _ U _ � W U _ U _ W U U_ W U_ U_ In N ❑ t(1 h tO ) � LO O f W o Q Cl) ti 00 LL h 0 a1 a ❑ � ❑ J ❑ ❑ it in ❑ ❑ ". 0] W ! ❑ w J �. ❑ m W Z W J J w J ❑ x W K I'' w w O a � w Z Y a W wW p _ Ja � �' z ¢ uwi Z F Q' w - g I J LL ❑ O ❑ a J ' (A O U !. ❑ a m O U S h 0 ! U w 00 W W O - a a ' CLI Lb a : : I I a a a a a ¢ ¢ a a a a � a M a ¢ a a a ( a CL aLO I M co O LOto M N N O rl- O O M O 00 V .� CL U V (O GO N I 0) m O n ! ti V O O d E_ 0 N o N OC) N I' N i o N 0 N 0 N �' o N 0 N C. N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N o N o N Cl N UN I ` d O N Cl N Oi ! N O I' N O I N (� O : N N O N N {' O _ N ; (� O �, N (� O N N o N N O N M O N M O N M OI N : co O N { M O N co ,Qp a N D O O O O i O O O O o O O O O O O O O C\ O\ N (O t(1 h tO ) � LO O f W o I Cl) ti 00 00 h L = M N o Cl) C! - o Cl) N o M Lf)CD o to I o a to N o N N 0 (O N 0 �� (O I, to o Ln 0 o CD (O N o n h o P to o LO � to o 00 N 0 to LO 0 Q o Z d N o O o N 0 o 0o N 0 0 N 0 0 I, o N 0 I o o N 0 0 ! o N cc 0 0 o N o o N O o N 9 I,- 0 o N 0 o N 0 o N O o N o o N 0 0 N 0 0 N o 0 N p 02 a) w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o L o o 0 0 0 I c I � ! I z ' I z j 1 i I 0 z z I zz Z I z zz v Ia j > > W Q U > > > > > > O Ww w z z zc z z O pU D I O U y —I I W Y U 2 � c a � U I W z W LL Ll w F l � O Z W U U W U O U U af O z Z 0 z H j U z w OU Q w LL F W J U J p z O 2 s I I I z ' I z !1 I a z z I zz Z I z zz zz j > > W Q U > > > > > > O Ww w K U D Fi O pU w I O U 7 Y t° of iLLU—, LL ' q p Z I Z W Q U U U a O Ww w K U D O O pU w O U z w —I W Y U w a U < W z W Ll w l � U U W O U af O > Z 0 - H j U z w Q w LL F W U J �. C g O j p > U d Z O n N w U U O Q p p U � Q 1 M � � M w `m U U a D � ~O U)i Q _ :E p z J m w F j> W U O U O 2 p U J w > Z 7W W ,. J o6 F- Uu J Y W Y I' p F p Z LLl �. J W O of m of m w a z w w O J_ LU Of > c ¢ w LL ~¢ U w U U)F W p i O W Q a U ~ W > m F it W > U r M N a O w af O IO O O N O O in 04 LLC) w m O U LL > U U J U N I N N O O O LL O I O Z LL O LL O 0 LL O IL Ln j O FL O O O O O O O O O O 11 cq C-4 cq 0 0 1 0 0 U _^ U U Q U U Q U U p Iii M "J p _ Q O 7 N O U Q W N x H O W> N N O m I l0 m p U w I:. U QO rnU :, Q J U > U of J U a " (A coo (A tO Q LLJ (0Q I. I I, II I I I i I Ij�I J J J W w w W J W M J Z O W Z J w W ZLY z 0 J z a W x U o N 5iO i'� � U � 2 J :5i U W I (I) w Z x O J0 Q w 2 LL (A U m 2 a I I a I I i IL CL IL a a a a a a Q¢ (L Ln LO v Lo v o 0) LP cM �qo co It "t W V' V ! a6 m 04 Cl O - O O O O O O O O O _E N O N O N O N O N O i N O N O N O N O N - O N O N N N - N N N N N _ N N N m v v c v v v v v v LO n ' ti ! C co c0 to co NNNM co co co Cl)M co c0 J co Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O IA O O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N o v 0 0 0 0 o 0 0- 30 - o o 7 Y t° of iLLU—, ' q p W Q U U U O Ww K U D O pU O U z w —I W Y U w U < z Ll w � U U W O U af > Z 0 J H j U z w Q w LL F U U U J J W m O j p U d Z p IL n U U U O Q 0 p U � Q 1 M � � M U ai U U a D � U)i Q _ p J m W 2 p U J > Z I Z J o6 Uu J p F p Z Z w J W O m J w O J_ m > J Of m L a a a a v m 00 N O Cl) r M N a O O O O O IO O O N O O j. O N 04 O LO N N I N i D 0 Ln N N N N I N N O O O O I O 13 I o 0 0 0 w Ln j O O O O O O O O O O O 11 cq C-4 cq 0 0 1 0 0 0 I o I I ' ❑O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ D 1 O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z z z Z z I z z Z D 7) D Z D 7) D D 7) D 7 7 7)I J 7 D A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O IV O O 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2i 2 2 2 z i LLI w F z � I I I w a z I o it w j o ❑ E z fff Lz I i p I i W (> w i. 1 ❑ I 0 J � d w I 1 W LL Z w F D U F _ U w O F= O Q Z O J W Z W U Z)Q W Q o > J J _ Y a w 2i = J J 4) Q F U Q QLL Q O Q U O Q in w U- I Z LL Z fn U W U Z U � Z d U U❑ w m 2i m O LL U W aar 2i 0 J d Jd 0 C) w LL J LUL O ULL OQ U U ❑ U j W U N U y (n w 2 U U o Z a U .�- ¢ a C CW, r >_LOU m = m W N O = O 7 r U U M Q • : � ❑ ' Q 2 (n Z m Z Y I W W U - rn o j U) - LL (n 4. to W Z U - of o Fn - V1 - In - fA 2i � m (n Q � Q a (o ❑ ❑ i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ca II co co 00 ca w ❑ m -� Z w W N m w W m W W z W Z U z J z J (n w W � U W W F W U W W W 0 Q�Q w W U = I' _ J > Q -j w y ❑ Y a a O ❑ W O x Z a O O a o ❑ o LL U U U m U U n Q aQ ¢ LL LL Q Q Q LL LL LL LL a Q a a (o O �_ (n N W O M N O N (� (O (A M V N N N (n N a0 a o I o o o o 0 0 0 o o o o i' o o o o pN E t C04 N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N Cl N N O N N O N N O N N O N 'N d I to (o co co (o o I; r h a0 W W co ao c`o N 67 N O N O N a O N G O O - •• ; Cl) !r N h U) w r O r 00 ~ O C) (D L (l) (a (n (o (O m (o (o P (c (o oD (a O7 w n t� n NN r- t- N t- M n V � Z 0 o 0 Cl 0 o 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 i o 0 o h C W (� 0 o N 0 o N 0 o N �I 0 o N o ! o N o o N o o o 0 N l o o N o o N o o j N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N o o N o o N o I, o N , pQ v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �� i, N O N :s a j U UN CL O � N C o �o O d U ' ~� � ~ ow O O. Ocl: W i Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z U j I I � � I I 1 a i I q i o i- � d U W d OJ } } Q w z � 1 I U O I I i g C w ¢ Q g w x � cn U w O 0 j d � D D m i ~ i 0 O O � z m ;a O 3- 2 w a w I ¢ U v, a O¢ U � ¢ i= U O can > > Ow U U U LL a J W p W( a g m U t > _ � 1 7 p II O Q Q LL0 0 l0 LU U) fn J w U W (n i z III a O p p 0 p m m m w J J z m I. W J m w J w � H ' F w ❑ W W w W w w - p W z w 2 F g a W g F Z a' J J J Q 2 OU OU m > x w ¢ p Q W ¢ Q ¢ a CL a a ¢ a a V 0 M M M o N O O Qct O O O OO o o 0 0 FG N N Cl N N N N N N N N NN M M i M M M M M M o 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 h MO1 07 L, r N Z o o a o o o 0 0 0 0 d o o o 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 332 - 0 N O N :s a U UN CL O � N C o �o O d U ' ~� � ~ ow O O. Ocl: W S B&MLENK Real People. Real Solutions. February 6, 2020 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2019 Street & Utility Project— Sherwood Drive City Project Nos. PW -19-01 Award of Bid Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: 19521448-8838 Fax: 19521448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com Bids were received at City Hall on February 4, 2020 for the 2019 Street & Utility Project— Sherwood Drive with eight bids received and the following results: CONTRACTOR AMOUNT BID Kusske Construction $254,480.00 G.F. Jedlicki $279,558.00 Widmer Construction $284,694.50 Northdale Construction $289,831.11 Pember Companies $313,203.80 Minger Construction $317,870.50 Meyer Contracting $332,105.42 GM Contracting $362,611.67 The low bid is from Kusske Construction. They are out of Chaska, have worked in Mound before, and are qualified to successfully complete this type of work. These bid results are the last of the three repackaged projects from the previously rejected bids for the previous 2019 Project. This bid award, aggregated with the others, represent approximately $300,000 in construction cost savings over the original project bids. Of note, this project received 8 bids, which is a notable number, and the resulting three repackaged projects have all been awarded to different contractors. It is our recommendation that the Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the 2019 Street & Utility Project— Sherwood Drive in the amount of $254,480.00 to Kusske Construction. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Brian D. Simmons, P.E City Engineer VAColo4\H\MOONVC19119633\1_CorresVC To Others\2020-02-06 Ltr to Council, Bid Award.docx Bolton & Menk is an CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 20 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE 2019 STREET & UTILITY PROJECT - SHERWOOD DRIVE CITY PROJECT NO. PW -19-01 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 19-35 adopted by the City Council the 14th day of May, 2019, directed the advertising of, and the receipt of bids for the 2019 Street & Utility Project — Sherwood Drive; and WHEREAS, the project was previously bid, and the two bids received were subsequently deemed to not be in the best interest of the City of Mound, and rejected; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 19-47 the city reserved the right to rebid the project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2019 Street & Utility Project — Sherwood Drive, bids were received on February 4, 2020, opened and tabulated according to law, with the following bids received and complying with the advertisement: Kusske Construction $254,480.00 G.F. Jedlicki $279,558.00 Widmer Construction $284,694.50 Northdale Construction $289,831.11 Pember Companies $313,203.80 Minger Construction $317,870.50 Meyer Contracting $332,105.42 GM Contracting $362,611.67 AND WHEREAS, Kusske Construction Company LLC. Of Chaska, MN is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Kusske Construction of Chaska, MN, in the name of the City of Mound for the 2019 Street & Utility Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of February 2020. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Raymond J Salazar 1 -334- 10. nAL CITY OF MOUND 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD • MOUND, MN 55364-1668 • PH: 952-472-0600 • FAX: 952-472-0620 • WWW.CITYOFMOUND.COM MEMORANDUM Date: February 6, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Eric Hoversten, City Manager Subject: Request for Qualification and Interest (RFQ/1) in a Residential Development in the Mound Harbor District The Mound City Council approved the release of the RFQ/I at their November 26, 2019 regular council meeting. The RFQ/I was sent to over 50 companies involved in the luxury home market and was intended to seek developer interest in a residential development on 2.35 acres in the Mound Harbor District. The results of a Phase II Environmental Study were made available on January 8"' and responses/proposals were due on January 20. While staff remained engaged with multiple interested developers throughout the response period of the RFQ/I, the City received one proposal by the due date. Feedback Staff received thereafter indicates the desired medium density appears to be financially infeasible without City willingness to financially participate in the soils correction. Consistent with that feedback; the submitted proposal is for a 55 -unit, cooperative living, luxury residential development that would be independently financed, pay $800K for the 2.35 acres, and create $16.2M in additional market value. The Development Committee formally reviewed this proposal on February 4a'. The Committee identified several concerns with the proposed project, including overall height, architectural style, and proposed rights of way, that they considered disqualifying unless the developer was willing and able to entertain alternatives. These concerns were conveyed to the respondent. The respondent has indicated they are very interested in reshaping their proposal to address the expressed concerns. Staff requests the City Council discuss how to proceed with the process and next steps. It would seem appropriate to avoid overly -critiquing the current proposal in light of the respondent's desire to present alternatives. It should be noted that while site plan, appearance, and the horizontal features of the proposal are likely to change with any alternatives; the housing product type and high density/intensity of use on the site are likely to remain as proposed based on the economics of the underlying site conditions and improvements needed. A discussion on what level of density should be allowed when weighing it against the original goals and objectives outlined in the original RFQ/I (attached) seems appropriate. -335- EXCERPTS: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION AND INTEREST IN A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE MOUND HARBOR DISTRICT MOUND, MN Project Goals 1. Medium density (min 7un/ac), high-end homes to increase tax base while balancing final density with overall total tax improvement across the area. 2. Receive a competitive price for the land 3. Provide for continued or improved public enjoyment and aesthetic of the adjacent Harbor District spaces that will remain public and publicly -accessible. 4. While the City has contemplated multi -family townhome units similar to the concept provided for in this packet, all formats will be considered and evaluated based on goals stated here in and criteria provided below. 5. City has contemplated designs that include 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths with an owner's suite on the main living level and additional living and bedrooms up or down, 2-3 car enclosed parking; comparable to the Villas on Lost Lake, 5485 Lost Lake Court, Mound. 6. The City has contemplated residential -only development within the project area. 7. The City prefers initial owner -occupancy for homes/units. 8. City will provide a maximum of one overnight dock space per residential unit not to exceed 20 total docks in the adjacent harbor multi -slip complexes. 9. The City desires a 36 - 40 -month maximum construction timeline for the development activities described here in. Selection Process Factors 1. Ability to maximize quality and corresponding future market- and tax -values. 2. Ability to provide a competitive price for City land required for the proposed project. 3. Preservation/improvement of circulation and functions in the area 4. Ability to complement the stylistic features and amenities of other downtown features. 5. Concurrence with proposed Purchase and Development Agreement Language 6. Demonstrated experience completing developments similar to as proposed 7. Ability to independently finance all improvements and development costs. 8. Ability to complete the development in a timely manner. 9. Consideration of other project goals stated above -336- >Mmocm00 m-1<M5K mDm�ZUn N 0 m n C: n D-nr-�r'r-< o O 0 �mcnv O � > C � cn '< cn 3 M v Z sp y z to a m m m O n o CDo r � � y Z a co � D D O cn 0 0 m z � � 0py D D FF cn n N W ? W W N� LL W NNcn - 337 - m 3 N CD co 3 O C z v X m v m D m z n Iv m O K z �i v 0 fD 3 rr 0 N 0 o O O a cn CO m cn z o D X Z ,Z z C m m O n oD r � � y Z a co � D D O cn 0 0 � � 0py D FF m O cn y -n m 2 D v m v m D D n aOn rrom,icem o -n O0 � -n7 O� �'O0 -nZm � TZm 00 � Tw On D co � m [A a � c � c = c = c =4 •C r m m �, m m m m v m e� � � w O N W 00 O O O W W 0 0 0 W -+ �f Cn O N W V O O O--• W w O(D 0 0 00 -+ V C Cc 00 � N O _ O W 446 N O O W V N W O N N W W O O O W W W co y D CCA O s W O O CA -4V N v O W N 00 W O 0 0 0 N C O s� cn 4 WO (n co 000 (Oil NWS D O W N O O O O V 4 O — O O N N O O O WP6 to � S T V O ? N O O O O O CA 0 0 N O 0 0 W s A = C m � W O V CD W W C 3 N O 00 CO0 0� W-� A C7 W cn N N O W W W ANN CO 4— 0 O W Ul O y D Q A O N lh W Cn 00 O CD C) Ln O 00 v O W CSO W� O W W W W CNn = C s Cn ? W 4 CA O V 00 A 4 D - 337 - m 3 N CD co 3 O C z v X m v m D m z n Iv m O K z �i v 0 fD 3 rr cn cr, 7 OL W O 0) D X 0) 7 OL (D r n> (D CD D v 3 n O uo v cm c O oa n 2a = o m s M :' O 0 o c = � N � a - 338 - car cn cn v* Z 0) cn p Q m 00 -4 -J i i i GaNN� v i p D 0 0 o o m 0 C C C C � 7 7 O 7 a a a a Xcyl � x Oi� �x >cXXx D o< O N CDO m Cn � Q ° Cl fn WW O rg m Cl : n Q m CD 0 ELN �- mrnmm0,1 r -M m v v N N Do o D N v = :3v 3 Q a3 � � 0) cncnO as Z O O ET Ey CD CDv ~- ~- � D CD a) a) 0OLaaoO re CD Z 0-0Z -0Z Z a 1 O O m ° _s _� Co D m>» T� CO m Z =o mm� o a0 O m N Q a 2 CII O m V O N .A i TI y ic n C CL CD = CL CD CD O v C CD CL = rF cn rn cn m cn 0 cn 0 cn m m 0 cn cn cn cn m cn cn cn m cn m -N m -1h. cn -N m -N m w cn � W i W N W N -1 � K3�� N N N N N N CO N 00 N N N N N OCO00O�AM 80- (O -1 a O Z Cn N � � � N � N N � N N � N � N � N � N0 NN 0O O O O O O O O O OO co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 7 OL 7 a 7 a 7 a 7 a 7 a 7 a 7 a a 7 Q. 7 a 7 a 7 a 7 a 7 a 7 a i [�Nt=[fit; N X O �>C N p COcn W O CO r x(nX 3 CD �-�3 Q� 3 X S. 3 m 3 O (D (D o N (D � < (D ur a � (D (D (D N a N O** CD (D O N N W W N W r� 7 r N W< 0 W W<< 00W W Q co (�D N < Q- CD CO (D < a <• < Q- < a a < < O a (D a O a a a c (D y (D (D (D (D (D (D (D CD (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D O} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CCCC�C�CCCCCC:=CC m m m m m m m m rn rn rn m m m m m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm C7 0 0 (D 7 �-1Z-I ��-i��-I0 cu -i °n�n�n�CD O D ° n�n�°v � : � D @@"m =j > > > > rn @ CD (D �. ((n .- 0 ° O > a N cn O O O Q N N ° a 0 N ° O to X 0 0 (p 0 o tn' 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 = (p o :3m O aa�a CD ° (D m aaaaaan CD (D (D (D (D Cn (D a 0 CD m v(flW cnCn00iCpCn-�cn cn OBD - 338 - car cn cn v* Z 0) cn p Q m 00 -4 -J i i i GaNN� v i p D 0 0 o o m 0 C C C C � 7 7 O 7 a a a a Xcyl � x Oi� �x >cXXx D o< O N CDO m Cn � Q ° Cl fn WW O rg m Cl : n Q m CD 0 ELN �- mrnmm0,1 r -M m v v N N Do o D N v = :3v 3 Q a3 � � 0) cncnO as Z O O ET Ey CD CDv ~- ~- � D CD a) a) 0OLaaoO re CD Z 0-0Z -0Z Z a 1 O O m ° _s _� Co D m>» T� CO m Z =o mm� o a0 O m N Q a 2 CII O m V O N .A i TI y ic n C CL CD = CL CD CD O v C CD CL = rF �� Wine 8 Spirits TOTAL -January 206,266 200,588 JANUARY 2020 VS 2019 DATE SALES '20 '19 '20 119 Monday +/- '20 119 +/- Tuesday 119 1 119 New Years Wednesday 1 2 New Years 4,396 Thursday 2 3 4,512 5,241 Friday 3 4 9,900 10,727 Saturday 4 5 8,953 9,506 Sunday 5 6 5,256 4,180 Monday 6 7 5,028 3,782 Tuesday 7 8 4,847 4,824 Wednesday 8 9 4,837 5,179 Thursday 9 10 5,635 5,111 Friday 10 11 11,546 11,974 Saturday 11 12 11,342 10,401 Sunday 12 13 4,843 3,625 Monday 13 14 4,403 3,615 Tuesday 14 15 4,923 5,397 Wednesday 15 16 5,137 4,841 Thursday 16 17 7,998 6,397 Friday 17 18 16,338 12,458 Saturday 18 19 7,485 10,640 Sunday 19 20 5,585 5,899 Monday 20 21 4,567 4,077 Tuesday 21 22 4,193 4,960 Wednesday 22 23 5,250 4,292 Thursday 23 24 5,424 6,762 Friday 24 25 11,380 11,271 Saturday 25 26 9,427 10,581 Sunday 26 27 4,411 6,620 Monday 27 28 4,322 5,557 Tuesday 28 29 4,991 6,895 Wednesday 29 30 5,151 6,163 Thursday 30 31 6,210 5,216 Friday 31 6% 12,372 239 TOTAL -January 206,266 200,588 JANUARY 2020 VS 2019 -339- CUSTOMERS AVERAGE TICKET GROSS PROFIT % Weather/Events +/- '20 119 +/- '20 119 +/- '20 119 '20 119 221 -100% 20 27% ovrest 20s -14% 236 258 -9% 19 20 -6%- 28% pt sun 35 pt sun 40 -8% 404 469 -14% 25 23 7% 28% 27% cldy 32 ovrest 40 -6% 384 419 -8% 23 23 3% 29% 28% cldy 32 sun 38 26% 246 220 12% 21 19 12% 31% 28% cldy 30 ovrest 40 33% 234 216 8% 21 18 23% 29% 28% cldy 25 ovrest 30s 0% 240 263 -9% 20 18 10% 31% 26% pt sun 20 ovrest 18 -7% 236 271 -13% 20 19 7% 29% 28% pt sun 20 pt sun 24 10% 259 240 8% 22 21 2% 29% 25% sun 40 ovrest 30s -4% 475 496 -4% 24 24 1% 28% 26% wndy 10 ovrest 30s 9% 468 428 9% 24 24 0% 27% 27% 15 sun 30 34% 221 189 17% 22 19 14% 27% 27% 20 sun 35 22% 207 203 2% 21 18 19% 30% 27% snow 31 ovrest 32 -9% 223 268 -17% 22 20 10% 29% 27% Itsnw 32 ovrest 33 6% 250 239 5% 21 20 1% 28% 28% wndy 20 ovrest 20s 25% 331 285 16% 24 22 8% 30% 27% wndy -10 ovrest 20s 31% 625 485 29% 26 26 2% 27% 26% SNW STRM ovrest 11 -30% 331 415 -20% 23 26 -12% 28% 27% wnd 5 ovrest 11 -5% 242 259 -7% 23 23 1% 30% 27% wnd 7 sun 18 12% 225 224 0% 20 18 12% 29% 28% amsnw 10 -15% 235 252 -7% 18 20 -9% 28% 25% wnd 16 sun 20 22% 254 238 7% 21 18 15% 29% 27% pt sun 26 ovrest 24 -20% 250 295 -15% 22 23 -5% 29% 26% Itsnw32 ovrest 20s 1% 444 441 1% 26 26 0% 26% 27% cldy 30's pt sun 5 -11% 386 421 -8% 24 25 -3% 30% 27% cldy 32 pt sun 11 -33% 231 283 -18% 19 23 -18% 30% 28% cldy 35 pt sun 6 -22% 224 252 -11% 19 22 -13% 30% 28% cldy 15 ovrest 13 -28% 237 303 -22% 21 23 -7% 31% 27% cldy 23 ovrest -20 -16% 245 275 -11% 21 22 -6% 30% 27% cldy 23 sun -27 19% 266 265 0% 23 20 19% 30% 28% cldy 25 sun -20 451 27 27% 30'S SNWY 3% 9,060 9,093 0% 23 22 3% -339- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 7, 2020 Vice Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. SWEARING IN OF PLANNING COMMISSIONERS BY CITY MANAGER ERIC HOVERSTEN Commissioners David Pelka, Jake Saystrom and Jon Ciatti were sworn in to 3 -year terms on the Planning Commission. ROLL CALL Members present: Vice Chair David Goode; Commissioners Jon Ciatti, Kevin Castellano, Jake Saystrom, Jason Baker, Drew Heal, David Pelka and Councilmember Sherri Pugh. Absent: Sue Pilling/ Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jen Holmquist. Several persons attended the meeting including representatives from Schafer Richardson. Discussion/Action — Election of Chair and Vice Chair Commissioner Goode opened discussion regarding electing chair and vice chair of the commission. Goode said he would be willing to continue in his role as Vice Chair. Goode nominated Commissioner Pelka to be the Chair. Pelka responded that he is willing to serve as the chair. A written ballot was taken. Unanimous results were that Commissioner Pelka will serve as Chair and Commissioner Goode will serve as Vice Chair. By consensus, it was agreed that Vice Chair Goode would continue to Chair the Jan 7th meeting as Pelka was newly elected. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Baker to approve the agenda as amended; seconded by Heal. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF December 3, 2019 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Baker to approve the, December 3, 2019 meeting minutes as written; seconded by Saystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 20-01 Public Hearing — Proposed Redevelopment of Commerce Place Shopping Center 2200-2238 Commerce Blvd. Applicant: Schafer Richardson -340- Planning Commission Minutes January 7, 2020 Trapp introduced the Concept Plan Review for the proposed redevelopment of Commerce Place Shopping Center. It is a 3.2 Acre site with 7 parcels. The project includes the removal of the current shopping center. The bank currently located in the vicinity is not owned by the applicant and is not included in this concept plan. The bank will remain in place, as is. Trapp stated that the applicant, Schafer Richard is proposing a 3 -story 101 -unit market rate apartment building. The intent is to get feedback from the Planning Commission and the public prior to investing the time and money to prepare the preliminary plat, engineering drawings and such. While there is no specific action sought, members were invited to ask questions and provide their feedback. Trapp noted that the applicant held a neighborhood meeting in mid-December and the concept sketch plan has been on the city's website and interested parties were invited to attend tonight's meeting. Trapp outlined that the concept brought forward in January of 2019 differs from the new concept in that originally the proposal included keeping part of the complex and with this concept the shopping center will be removed in its entirety with a new structure being built in its place. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan guides this area as destination district. Uses identified for the Destination District includes retail, office and service oriented businesses, as well as medium and high density residential. Thus, the proposed project matches what was in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The project is a 3 -story, 101 unit building which includes 5 different types of units, ranging from studios to 2 -bedroom units. The majority of units are 1 -bedroom units. Trapp noted that sizes and preliminary rent estimates have been provided by the applicant. The existing accesses to the bank will not change. Two of the access behind the building will be removed. The removal of these accesses does not conflict with the applicant's agreement with the bank. Staff continues to work with the applicant to clarify existing parking needs and proposed parking for the site. Given the interrelationship between the bank and the proposed apartment building, parking will need to be considered as a shared requirement. The applicant is proposing a peaked roof with a mid -point of 47 feet, which is within the 50 foot height maximum of the Destination District. Trapp noted that Hennepin County appreciated the removal of the east side alley access. Hennepin County Staff noted that they have interest in continued discussion about site access and circulation if anything should happen with the bank. Trapp noted that MCES has no comments. Minnehaha Creek comments were to proceed with erosion and storm water management as per usual. -341 - Planning Commission Minutes 3 January 7, 2020 Comments from Staff included that Fern Lane will be vacated. Parking setback and screening requirements will need to be followed. Landscaping will need to be part of future discussions. Pedestrian access from the rear will need to be addressed. Staff also recommends the applicant speak to building official and fire chief regarding compliance. Heal asked about crosswalk and boat parking. Trapp stated that there should be no boat slips included in the proposal and parking and trailers should not be allowed in the parking spaces. It was further noted that requirements regarding outdoor storage can be a part of project conditions. Saystrom asked what variance. Staff noted that as this is concept plan sufficient details have not been provided to date for a full evaluation. Saystrom asked if the property would be subject to the nuisance regulations discussed in the past. Specifically, exterior storage. Trapp says that is for single family residential properties. We could look at if those requirements need to be adjusted as part of this project. The applicant would be required to manage the parking to ensure the residents stay in compliance. Smith says that could be included in the development agreement as a way for the city to manage expectations. Saystrom asked if anyone has notified the school system about the project. Smith noted that the school is not an agency on the required notification list but confirmed that it is something that could be done as part of the process. Trapp added that given the number of studios, alcoves and 1 -bedroom units it unlikely that this will cause a large increase in school-age children. Baker clarified the extent of the Fern Lane vacation. Trapp confirmed it is just the southern part of the road. Pelka asked what guarantees we can expect that the final project will look the same as the drawings. He also wondered about whether traffic congestion has been considered. Trapp noted that both City and County Staff have looked at the concept and didn't have concerns. She explains that the intended use of the shopping center, if it were functioning as designed, would generate much higher traffic rates than city has become accustomed to seeing. Pugh notes that she believes the higher volume may be more of an issue. She believes additional traffic studies should be conducted. Staff confirmed that a traffic study is required as a part of this project. Castellano asked if there is rear access to the building. Trapp said there likely is but because of the views of the concept plan sketches provided it currently is not shown clearly. -342- Planning Commission Minutes January 7, 2020 Representatives from Schafer Richardson, Maureen Michalski and Trevor Martinez, were invited to speak with the Planning Commission. Ms. Michalski explained that boat storage will explicitly not be allowed in the parking areas. She further explained that the balconies will not be for additional storage. This will not be allowed. In reference to the earlier question regarding schools, she explained that based on their research for a property of this configuration, possibly 8% of the units in this proposed project would have school age children. Saystrom asked if her number is based on information specific to Mound or if it's averaged across all properties. Ms. Michalski confirmed it is market data from all of their properties, however she noted that a similar project in Edina mimicked what she had provided. Ms. Michalski confirmed that a parking and traffic study will be part of future submittals. She also reiterated that the existing commercial use typically generates larger volumes of traffic than this proposed project. Pugh inquired about notification of the neighborhood meeting and how were they notified. Mr. Martinez said they used the Hennepin County notification tool to send notice to property owners within 500 feet of the proposed project. Pugh commented that the notification distance was not far-reaching enough to include the entire neighborhood. She also noted that the 7 -day notice combined with holding the neighborhood meeting during the holidays may have prevented some people from attending. Pugh asked what benefit Mound will receive if this project moves forward. Mr. Martinez replied that the economic development will benefit the city. He stated the project will bring in a new demographic of people who aren't able to find a unit like this currently in Mound. Additionally, the tax benefits are projected to be $300,000 to $325,000 per year. Ms. Michalski added that the parcel, as it is, has proven to not be a viable use. She believes this project will bring back vibrancy to the downtown that is lacking due to the commercial space sitting empty. Baker asked about a previous concept plan that was mixed-use, including residential and commercial. Ms. Michalski replied that the decision was made that the previous plan would have created a 4 -story structure and the feedback from the community was that was too tall. Baker asked if the 3 -story residential structure was needed for the project to be viable. She replied that new commercial space, which would be at a higher price point, doesn't make sense since the current commercial space was not performing. The rents would be so high that it would discourage new commercial tenants. Baker asked if the applicant considered the architecture matching the surrounding commercial uses like Walgreens and Carbone's. Ms. Michalski replied that they were trying to mirror the design of the nearby townhomes, with the residential architecture and color scheme. Ciatti stated he has showed the plan to several other residents and he had many positive responses. -343- Planning Commission Minutes January 7, 2020 Castellano asked if the project would be viable as a 2 -story property. Ms. Michalski confirmed that their experience is that a project needs to have about 100 units in order to offset the construction cost. Pugh asked for information on storm drainage and what kinds of materials will be used. She wanted to know what assurances will be provided that the run off isn't going into the lake. She also wanted to know how this project will "look like Mound" rather than every other new apartment going up in the surrounding communities. Ms. Michalski noted the project is still in the preliminary stages of planning and if Pugh or any of the residents have suggestions for color or landscape choices, they are open to suggestions and will take those into consideration during final planning. Pugh says she believes the city should make the county aware of the project. Smith says the county was shown the concept sketch and is aware. The county is will be notified throughout the process and the city will review any concerns brought forth from the county. Pelka suggested a police officer be posted at the corner during busy traffic hours could help resolve traffic congestion. Pugh says there is an officer at the newly painted crosswalk and she believes that is a great addition. Baker asked if the developer has had any negotiation with Wells Fargo to incorporate their site into this project. Ms. Michalski replied that discussions with Wells Fargo Real Estate department have taken place in the past. The discussions concluded that at this time Wells Fargo is not interested in making any changes involving this asset. Smith confirmed that the city has reached out to Wells Fargo and her conversation echoed the reply by Ms. Michalski that they are not looking at a change at this location. Goode requested further information on the trash management at the site. Ms. Michalski said the trash will be stored down in the parking structure. Each floor of the apartment would have a trash chute to collect garbage and recycling. Then a small vehicle will pull the trailer out of the basement on trash collection days. Saystrom asked if this project would conform to the allowable units per acre. Ms. Michalski responded that the number of units per acre is aligned with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Trapp says the density requirements would be verified and has been a part of the discussion of this project all along. Pugh asked about amenities that may be included in this project. Mr. Martinez replied that this is still in the planning phases and all of the amenities have not be decided upon yet. Some of the possibilities are a community room, fitness area, pet grooming stations, interior bike parking, pet park, grilling/patio areas, yoga studio, and gaming room. Ms. Michalski says this is an area of development that is constantly evolving and they will work with their property management to decide which amenities will be best suited for a property in this location. Ciatti -344- Planning Commission Minutes January 7, 2020 requested clarification on bike parking, Ms. Michalski stated they provide spaces for that on- site to discourage residents from storing bikes on balconies, which would not be allowed. Goode asked if there are any other questions for the applicant or staff. Goode confirmed that there are no members of the public who wish to speak Planning Case No. 20-02 Review and Recommendation of Proposed Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning) Smith presented information regarding our on-going efforts to evaluate code regulations to improve enforcement and improve neighborhood appearance especially related to parking and exterior storage which is on the 2019 project list. Staff is looking to include language in the code to allow for enforcement options and to provide for quicker resolution to issues. Staff has also been working to address projects that have stalled or that have significant building code violations and where the owner is not making any progress or responding to requests for updates. In these cases, Staff can bring the matter to the council and invite the property owner or their representative to the council meeting to give them a chance to provide evidence if there is something that is preventing them from addressing the matter. As part of our efforts are looking at regulations that allow for enhancement of other tools. This is a portion of a larger project, working in cooperation with the City Attorney and the Police Department that will cross reference the zoning ordinance, the nuisance ordinance and Chapter 46. This change would allow that certain violations could be issued a citation. The city is also looking at a possible future amendment to look at parking on soft surfaces. Smith noted that the Planning Commission previously offered a slate of proposed changes to the code and/or procedures in July 2019 to help provide for better neighborhood appearance by reducing the number of storage units on vacant lots and prohibiting storage on vacant lots. The proposed ordinance amending the zoning ordinance that is being reviewed by the Planning Commission would prohibit exterior storage on vacant, undeveloped, residential property. For clarification, if a vacant residential lot exists and there is no adjacent developed lot owned by the same owner, the property owner would not be allowed to store anything on that lot. Current code allows for 1 unit for 3,000 square feet. It was recommended by the Planning Commission and supported by the Council that the current code language be revised and that parking of exterior storage on an undeveloped residential lot no longer be allowed. The Planning Commission discussed previously that this will help reduce the intensity of what is viewed and exposed in neighborhoods, specifically what is viewed from the road and adjacent properties. Along with exterior storage units, the Planning Commission previously discussed that the same regulation would be applied to ice shelter structures. -345- Planning Commission Minutes January 7, 2020 Smith mentioned that the detached trailer parking previously discussed by the Planning Commission will be included in a part of the City Code amendment but is not a zoning matter. Smith noted that City Staff is discussing an amendment, in cooperation with the police department to prohibit detached trailer parking or including an overnight restriction for ease of enforcement. The expectation is that if you have a detached trailer it is there for short term purposes and it will be moved shortly. Saystrom asked if a swing set or play structure would be considered a unit. Smith replies that those items would fall under a different category. Baker asked for clarification, recalling the Planning Commission previously recommendation regarding reducing the number of exterior storage units on developed properties. Smith replied the proposed change was not directed by the City Council. Baker also recalled that previous Planning Commission recommendations were that any vehicle needed current licensing and Castellano recalled during the same conversation that the vehicle needed to be operational. Smith replied that are enforcement issues related to vehicle licensing requirements and the exterior storage code that regulates the number of units. Baker also recalled from a previous discussion that storage would not be allowed on abutting properties even if both properties are owned by the same owner. Smith replied the expectation would be that the properties be tax combined then the property becomes a developed and subject to square footage allowance. Heal asked how would violations be enforced. Smith replies that Mound is a complaint based community. Thus, when a complaint comes in it would be referred to the appropriate entity depending on the complaint ( i.e. police department, field officer, building official, etc.) The responding party would attempt to resolve the complaint informally to be quickly followed up by a formal procedure, creating a paper trail related to the complaint. Heal asked what would be the consequence for a property owner who ignores the informal and formal procedures. Smith commented that there are remedies for code violations in the City Code. MOTION by Baker to recommend City Council adopt the proposed amendments to City Code, Chapter 129-314, as amended, with additional language that the regulations would not apply if a vacant lot that abuts a developed residential lot is combined at Hennepin County; seconded by Castellano. MOTION carried unanimously. Old/New Business A. Discussion/recommendation regarding annual review of Planning Commission Work Rules -346- Planning Commission Minutes 8 January 7, 2020 MOTION by Baker to table discussion/recommendation regarding annual review of Planning Commission Work Rules until the February 4, 2020 meeting; seconded by Goode. MOTION carried unanimously. B Discussion/recommendation regarding suggested date of Tues., February 18, 2020 to set special Planning Commission City Council workshop meeting for annual concurrent meeting with City Council to discuss 2019 projects overview and 2020 work plan. MOTION by Pelka to set special Planning Commission City Council workshop meeting on Tuesday, February 18, 2020; seconded by Baker. MOTION carried unanimously. B. Discussion/recommendation to reschedule Tues., March 3, 2020 regular meeting to Tues., March 17, 2020 due to presidential nominating primary MOTION by Baker to reschedule the Tuesday, March 3, 2020 to Tuesday, March 17, 2020; seconded by Saystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. C. Discussion/recommendation to reschedule Tues., August 4, 2020 regular meeting to Tuesday, August 18, 2020 due to Nite to Unite. MOTION by Baker to reschedule the Tuesday August 4, 2020 to Tuesday August 18, 2020; seconded by Castellano. MOTION carried unanimously D. Discussion/recommendation to reschedule Tues., November 3, 2020 regular meeting to Tuesday, November 17, 2020 due to presidential election MOTION by Baker to reschedule the Tuesday November 3, 2020 to Tuesday November 17, 2020; seconded by Ciatti. MOTION carried unanimously E. City Council liaison / Staff report Smith outlined that Planning Commission training will be scheduled for the newly appointed commissioners. Smith also provided a brief projects update. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Goode to adjourn at 9:26 pm; seconded by Baker. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jen Holmquist -347-