82-06-22HOUND CItY COUNCIL
June 22, 1982
Regular Meeting
City Hall - 7:30 P.M.
CITY OF MOUND
AGENDA
Mound, Minnesota
1. Minutes oF June 8, 1982, Regular Meeting
2. Continuation of Public Hearing on Proposed Wetlands Ordinance
3. Public Hearing Delinquent Utility Bills
4. Proposed Ordinances -
Related to Unnecessary Acceleration of Motor Vehicles, Public
Nuisance Noises, Participation in Noisy Parties, Disturbance
of the Peace, Entering Upon Land, Window Peeping and Giving
False Information to Police
5. Resolution to Support Senior Citizen Housing Project
Consideration of Solution to Water Meter Problem
7. Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present
(please limit to 3 minutes)
8. Renewal of 1982 Liquor Licenses:
A. Club License - Minnetonka Post 398 American Legion
Chamberlain-Goudy VFW Post 5113
B. Full Liquor License - Donnies on The Lake
Pg. 1250-1259
Pg. 1260-1270
Pg. 1271-1272
Pg. 1273-1277
Pg. 1278-1280
Pg. 1281-1288
Pg. 1289
9. Storm Sewer Petition from Residents adjacent to Peabody Ave.
1.0. Review and Approval of Bids for 1982 Street Overlay Program
II. Dropping Unit Charges for Combinations of:
A. Lots 4 & 33 and 5 & 32, Block 15, Arden Addition
B. Lots 51 and 52, Subdivisi-on of Lot 1 & 32, Skarp &
Lindquist's Ravenswood
12. Contract Amendment - School Drop-Off on Commerce Blvd.
13. Approval of Specifications and Authorize Solicitation of
Bids for Well #8
14. Request for Extension of Time Limit Requiring that Final
Plat for Pelican Point be Filed - June 22, 1983
1'5. Maintenance Permit for Step to Commons from Canary Lane
16. Payment of Bills
17. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Letter from Suburban Public Health Nursing Service
B. Letter from McCombs-Knutson - RE: 198l Street Project
C. Letter from Minne!.aha Creek Watershed District
.D. Letter from Mound State Bank - RE: Downtown Loan Program
E. Notice from Post Office - RE: New Location Solicitation
F. Letter from Burlington Northern
~g. 1290-1292
Pg. 1293-1295
Pg. 1296
Pg. 1297-1298
Pg. 1299-1300
Pg. 1301-1302
Pg. 1303-1318
Pg. 1319-1320
Pg. 1321
Pg. 1322
Pg. 1323
Pg. 1324-1325
Pg. 1326
Pg. 1327
Pg. 1328-1329
Pg. 1330
Page 1249
G. Letter from L.M.C.D.
H. Letter from Hennepin Coutny Park Reserve District
I. Anti-Trust Letter from Curt Pearson
J. Proposed Policies and ?rocedures for Administration of
Downtown Loan Program
18. Quotations for Palntlng of Island Park Hall
19. Full Liquor License - Surfside - Butch Essig
Pg. 1331
Pg., 1332-1334
Pg. 1335-1337
Pg. 1338-1347
Pg. 1348-1350
Pg. 1351-1353
Page 1249-a
June 18, 1982
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
IMPORTANT
THE MEETING THIS TUESDAY, JUNE 22ND, STARTS AT 6:30 P.M. WITH AN EXECUTIVE
SESSION. JIM LARSON AND DERRICK DAHLEN WILL BE DISCUSSING, IN DETAIL, THE
CITY'S INTERVENTION IN THE CONTINENTAL PHONE RATE CASE. IT IS AN IMPORTANT
MEETING. PLEASE TRY AND MAKE IT.
ALSO
JUNE 22NS IS MY ANNIVERSARY FOR HAVING COMPLETED ONE YEAR WORKING IN MOUNT.
I THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT I BUY A COUPLE OF ROUNDS AT THE LEGION
FOLLOWING THE MEETING TO THANK ALL OF YOU FOR THE GREAT EXPERIENCES YOU'VE
GIVEN ME. (HA. HA.)
JE:fc
REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
.ll4
June 8, 1982
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council 'Of
the City of'Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was held at 5341Maywood Road in
said City on June 8, 1982, at 7:30 P.M.
Those present were: Mayor RocE L~ndlan, Councilmembers PinEy Charon, Robert
Polston, Gordon Swenson, Donald Ulrick. Also present were: City Manager Jon ·
Elam, City Attorney Curt Pearson, Police Chief Bruce Wold, City Cl-erk Fran Clark,
and the following interested citizens: James A. Kutzner, James C. Hendricks,
William F. Kelley, Roy Holden, John Wagman, Margaret Hanson, Robt. Hanson,
Phyllis Jessen, Jim Scruton, Joan Wold, Ron Gehring.
The Mayor opened the meeting'and welcomed the people in a'ttendance.
MINUTES
The minutes of the regular'meeting on May 25, 1982, were presented for
consideration. Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion to approve the
minutes of the May 25, 1982, regular meeting, as presented. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBLIC .HEARING - WETLANDS DISTRICTS.- ZONING ORDINANCE
The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked for any comments or suggestions
from the people present.
Margaret Hanson'- asked what was changed in the Wetlands Ordinarl~e since
it was approved in March?
The City Attorney replied that there were procedural changes made that
needed to be added, such as Section 23.1105 on Authority which was
added in accordance with Minnesota Statutes giving the City control of
the wetlands. The numbering of the sections was also changed to fit
the new Zoning Ordinance. Section 23.1140, subsection A and C -
Building Official was deleted and City. Manager or his'designate were
added. Section 23.1150 Fees was added. Refining of the wetlands map
to more accurately reflect the sizes of wetlands. All of which has
to be approved again.
Wm. Kelley (Attorney for Priscilla Anderson and Charles Smith) - asked
that Lot 59, Auditor's Sub. 168 be changed from classification 4 to
classification 6 or 7. He then presented the Council with a report
from their consulting engineer, Schoell & Madson, stating that they
would classify Lot 59 as a Type 6 or Type 7. Mr. Kelley then passed
pictures of the area.around to the Council.
The City Attorney suggested having the City Engineer look at this
property and study it to see exactly what kind of wetlands it is.
Phyllis J'essen, member of the Wetland Committee who drafted the original
Wetlands Ordinance, stated that Hennepin County Soil & Water did not
feel TyF.e 6 or 7 wetlands were in Mound, only 3, 4 and 5 so they did
not address the other types.
115
June 8, 1982
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The City Attorney. suggested delaying action on this ordinance for a couple
of weeks in order to have a study done of the Anderson/Smith property by the
City Engineer, Hennepin County Soil & Water and the Wetlands. Committee;
then have them come back and define the lot in question. It was also
his recommendation that the City use all the definitions from the Fish and
Wildlife Service in the Wetland Ordinance.
Mr. Kelley granted t~e City permission from his client to go on the property
for this study.
The City Manager concurred with the'City Attorney's suggestions.
Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to continue the Public Hearing
on the Wetlands Ordinance to June 22, ~1982, at 7:30 P.M.
There was discussion by the Council on whether to'adopt the'ordinance as is
and delete the 'pi'ece of property in question..
The vote bn the motion was 4 in favor with Counc'ilmember'Polston voting no.
Motion carried..
SCHEDULE OF FEES - ZONING MATTERS. ~
Charon moved and Ulrick seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION # 82~152 RESOLUTION ESTABLI-SHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES
FOR ALL ZONING MATTERS IN THE CITY OF MOUND.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBL!C HEARING -. AMENDING THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM
The City Manager.explained that'this public hearing is being held for citizen.
input on the question of reallocating $2,552.74 from the Housing Rehabilitation
Component over into the Senior Citizen Housing Development Component. This
would amend'the Urban Hennepin'County Development Program for the Program
Year VII as follows:
pROGRAM YEAR ACTIVITY
VII Housing Rehabilitation
VII Westonka Senior Citizens
Housing
ORIGINAL AMENDED
BUDGET BUDGET
$20,000.00 $17,447.26
-O- 2,552.74
This money would be used for a number'of initial costs involved in a project
such as this, including land appraisal fees, site plans by an architect and
miscellaneous smaller costs. The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked
for comments. There were none. The Mayor then closed the public hearing.
Polson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-153
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AS IT INVOLVES
THE CITY OF MOUND FOR PROGRAM YEAR VII FUNDED
UNDER TITLE I OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974
June 8, 1982
The vote was unanimously in favoF. Motion carried.
The City Manager explained that now that the City Council has approved the re-
allocation, they need to explore the specifics involved in developing this
project. This includes securing an option by the City on the necessary land
by the Catholic Church. This is necessary in order to show HUD that firm
site control exists and if HUD does fund the project that it can go
aggressivel'y forward next Spring. Once the site is acquired using HUD funds,
it would be resold for $1.00 to the senior citizens and their nonprofit
housing development corporation. Then the City's actual involvement will'
end, except that it will retain 1 position on the project's Board of
Directors. He~.fu~ther explained that he needs authorization from~the City
Council to negotiate an option agreement with the church and that the City
will act as an agent for the senior citizens in seeking to acquire land
for'the housing project.
Polston moved and Charon seconded the following resol~ution.
RESOLUTION #I~2-154
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGE~ TO
NEGOTIATE AN OPTION AGREEMENT WITH THE CATHOLIC
CHURCH WITH REGARD TO THE LAND THE SENIOR CITIZENS
WOULD LIKE FOR THEIR HOUSING PROJECT
The Mayor stated that he took exception to this item being shoved at the
City Council so quickly. He wanted to know more about all the s~es
that were considered and felt the Council and the Planning Commission
should have move infor, mation and should.have, been consulted prior to a
decision. '.
Councilmember,Bolston Stated that over the past two years, the Counci-I has
6ee~'made aware, thru memorandums, of the .various sites under consideration.
The City Manager explained' that.under HUD rules, the City must be the'agent
in the.acquisition o£ the land for this type of 202 Senior Housing.
The roll call vote on the~above resolution was 4 in favor with Mayor Lindlan
voting no. Motion carried.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
A. PRELIMINARY LOT SPLIT .- .JAMES SCRUTON - LOT 31, AUDITOR'S SUB. 170
The City Manager explained that the applicant has submitted a preliminary
subdivision (lot-split) request to divide off an 80 x 125 foot parcel
from his existing lot. Both parcels would meet the lO,O00 square foot
lot size requirement for the R-1 Zoning District. The applicant intends
to .remove the existing garage, located on the survey, and construct a
new double garage facing Bartlett Blvd., a minimum of 20 f6et from the
southwest corner of the lot he would like to split off. The Planning
Commission has recommended approval with the Building Inspector's
recommendations as follows:
I. I would recommend approval of his preliminary concept allowing a 20
foot access to his property for emergency vehicles and general use
from a public right-of-way, due to the excessive depth of the unplatted
property. Final approval of the lot-split should require:
a. The submi~.tal of the legal description for Parcel ~'AI' and Parcel
"B" with the resetting of the property monuments.
117
June 8, 1982
The location of the Utilities servi.cing the existing structure
and topography of the site placed on the survey.
The removal of the existing garage from the site.
Resubmit a final subdivision approval within one year.
The City Attorney pointed out that the Council would also have to
grant the applicant a 40 foot variance for Parcel "B"'s frontage
on Bartlett Blvd. because the minimum width of a lot facing a public
road in the R-1 District is.60' and he will only have 20'.
Charon moved and Swenson seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-155 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH'THE PLANNING COMMISSION
". RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY LOT SPLIT
AS REQUESTED AND WITH THE BUILDING INSPECTOR'S
RECOMMENDATIONS
Councilmember Ulrick asked the maker of t~e motion and the
seconder to consider adding 2 other items to the Building Inspector's
recommendations. .They are:
1. Make sure the water and sewer unit charges are paid.
2. Reason'for approval is an unusually deep lot with unusually
large square footage and not to approve the request would be
denying Mr. Scruton use of his property~
The maker and the seconde~ agreed to add the above. ~
Roll call vote' was 3 in favor with ¢ouncilmembers Charon and Polston
voting no. Motion carried. Councilmember Pol.ston stated that he
voted no. because he could see no hardship.
B..SUBDIVISION. (LOT SPLIT) - REBECCA YANTES - LOTS
RAVENSWOOD
The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the preliminary subdivision with the stipulation..that
the house be brought to compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and the
shed be removed and meet the other recommendationsof the Buildfng
Official. 'The Building'Official's recommendations were:
1. Locating utilities servicing the existing structure and topography
of the site placed on the survey.
2. Removal of the existing shed building and basement entrance from
the site including 6" encroachment of.the house .on Parcel B.
.3. All persons with financial interest in the property submit approval
of the lot-split request.
4. Re-submit final subdivision approval within one year.
After Council discussion, 2 more items were added to the stipulations.
5. Provide off street parking for Parcel "B"
6. Make sure the water and sewer unit charges are paid, also street
assessment unit charges, if applicable.
Ulrick moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION.#82-156
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY LOT-SPLIT
WITH THE 6 STIPULATIONS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
SIDEYARD VARIANCE - JAMES C. HENDRI£KS
118
June 8, t~82
LOTS 4,5,6 & 19, BLOCK 14,
THE HIGHLANDS
The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission has recommended.
approval of a 4.6 foot sideyard variance, acknowledging the existing ~'
encroachment, as the proposed addition does not increase the non-
conformancy. The Building Inspector recommended approval because of'
an undue hardship to remove the 4.6 encroachment in the side yard
as that portion has a Full basement, ~s heated and ~s part oF the
present kitchen. Also, the addition to the structure will be in
conformance ~ith the present zohing requirements.
Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-157
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE 4.6 FOOT SIDEYARD
VARIANCE - LOTS 4,5,6 & 19, BLOCK 14, THE HIGHLANDS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZEN PRESENT
The Mayor asked for any comments, suggestions or questions from the citizens
present.
Margaret Hanson asked if the recent-soil=borings done in the Lost Lake
area.by County Rd. 15 were done by-the P.C.A.?
The City Manager responded no, they were done privately by a prospective
developer. ,.
John Wagman questioned whether..the Council thought'it wise to bore in an
area t~at might contain hazardous wastes. The Mayor 'and the City M~nager
told. Mr. Wagman that it is all conjecture on the part of the P.C.A. as to
if'there'is hazardous waste in that area.
TAX FORFEITURE PARCELS OF LAND
The City Manager explained that there are 7 more parcels of land that have
gone tax forfeiture and the County wants to know wi~ich lots to sell. He
is recommending that parcels 1, 2, and 3 be released for sale by the County
and'parcels, 4, 5, 6, and 7 be withheld for private sale to adjacent property
owners. He explained that 1 thru 3 are buildable sites and 4 thru 7 are
unbuildable sites.
Polston moved and Swenson seconded, the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-158
RESOLUTION RELEASING PARCELS 1 THRU 3, ON PAGE
1164 OF THE COUNCIL PACKET, TO THE COUNTY FOR SALE "'
The vote was unanimous.ly in favor. Motion carried.
Swenson moved 'and Ulrick seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-159
RESOLUTION TO WITHHOLD PARCELS 4 THRU 7, ON PAGE
1164 OF THE COUNCIL PACKET, FOR PRIVATE SALE TO
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
119
June 8, 1982
The vote was .unanimously in favok. Motion carried.
MANCHESTER ROAD PARKING SIGNS
This item was held over from the May 25th Meeting.
Swenson moved and Charon seconded the following:
ORDINANCE.#435
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 46'.29, SUBSECTION (c)
OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING SUBDIVISION #12 -
NO PARKING ANYTIME ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MANCHESTER
ROAD FROM BRIGHTON BLVD. TO THE COMMONS
Citizen Dick Carlson asked that.the no parking anytime be from
Brighton Blvd. to Cambridge only not to the Commons.
The Vote was u~animou'sl.y in favor of the original ordinance amendment.
Motion carried.
BLUEBIRD [ANE PROBLEMS
Ms. Holly Lovseth had asked 'to be put on'the Council Agenda for this item.
She was not'present. No action was'taken and it was not discusse~.
ELECTION BALLOT COUNTER
The City Manager explained that. this is just final or. der:'approval for
the unit that was approved when the Revenue Sharing' Budget was approved,.
Swehson moved and .Charon seconded a motio.n to approve the purchase of the
PEPS Unit, Card Reader (.300 cpm), Cable Connector and Program License
at a cost of $9,275.00 less the trade in of 2, pin f.~ed style precinct
ballot counters at $1,500.00 each or.$3~OOO.OO,.ma~ing the cost of the
machine $6,275.00 Net to the City. 'The vote was unanimously in favor,
Motion carried.
EASEMENT AGREEMENT FROM 1979 STREET IMPROVEMENT
The City Manager. explained that this is an easement, from the. 1979 Street
Improvement on Lot 10, Block 7,' Arden that now belongs' to the State of
Minnesota. The City Attorney has supplied the City with an Application
by Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of'Tax~For, fei tecl Lands that
needs to be approved by the' City Council, signed by' the Mayor and the
City Manager and fi led at the courthouse.
Polston moved and Charon seconded the. following resolution.~
RESOLUTION #82-160
RESOLUIION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITy MANAGER
TO SIGN THE APPLICATION BY GOVERNMENTAL SUBDIVISION
FOR CONVEYANCE OF.TAX-FORFIETED LANDS WHICH WILL
CLEAR UP ANOTHER PROBLEM EASEMENT FROM THE 1979
STREET IMPROVEMENT
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
120
June 8, 1982
SOIL REPORT - WIDMER BUILDING COUNTY RD. 110
The City Manager explained that based on the soil and foundation report
furnished by Soil Exploration Company, the soil.and foundation under and
around the Widmer Building on County Road 110 are just not appropriate
for use as a public works site unless the cost was reduced substantially
so that we.would have adequate funds on hand for all the repairs we
would have to make over the years.
He stated that Mr. Ron Shaff~r and Mr. Bud Stannard were present tonight
if the Council. would'like to ask their expert opinion on the soil ~nd
foundation report. Mr. Stannard stated that in his opinion.it would take
an additional $30,000 to $40,000 to correct the site for use as a public
works building.
S~enson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to notify Mr. Widmer that the
City of Mound is no longer interested in purchasing his property on
County Road.IlO. The vote was unanimously.in favor. Motion carried.
GAMBLING PERMIT - SHORELINE EARLY INTERVENTION & BRIDGE
Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-161 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE :~GSUANCE
OF A GAMBLING PERMIT TO SHORELINE'EARLY INTERVENTION
AND BRIDGE FOR A RAFELE TO BE HELD JUNE 18 & 19, 1982.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to approve the payment of bills
as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $60,742.11, when funds are
available. Roll call voted was unanimously in favor. Motion car'ried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
The City Manager p~ovided information on the following:.
A. LETTER FROM ATTORNEY JIM LARSON ON CONTINENTAL CASE: Summary of
DPS staff testimony and Derick Dahlen's testimony.
PAGE OF MAPLE PLAIN NEWSLETTER: A notice of the June 7th public
hearing in Maple Plain regarding Continental Telephone's proposed
rate increase and a list Of contributors:who have donated to the
Rate Challenge Fund.
Co CONTINENTAL PURCHASE OF COMPUTOR BUSINESS: An article on Continental
Telephone purchasing a computer services company, STSC.
Do
LETTER FROM MTC ON SHELTER AT BARTLETT & SHORELINE:- A letter
confirming that a Type D shelter instead of a Type C shelter, should
be adequate to accomodate the bus patrons.
June 8~ 1982
E. JIM REGAN'S REQUEST FOR ORDINANCE CHANGE: Jim Regan has submitted
a letter to the City Council asking that our present ordinance
prohibiting automobile racing on the ice during the winter be
expanded to Include prohibiting motorized water craft races on
the lake during the summer months. The City Manager wrote to
Mr. Regan and explained that the L.M.C.D. has ordinances prohibiting
this activity.'
Polston moved and Ulrick seconded the following:
ORDINANCE #434
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 38.64 OF THE CITY
CODE PROHIBITING. MOTORIZED WATER CRAFT RACES
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
LETTER FROM CITY PROSECUTOR: The 1982 Legislature gave the city
attorneys prosecution authority for gross misdemeanor DWIs effective
April I, 1982, and als° amended the Municipal Court statute, effective
January 1, 1983, to give the Court jurisdiction of all gross misdemeanors.
This could mean additional costs for the cities, both through
prosecuting attorney costs and jail costs.
LETTER FROM.CITY ATTORNEY'ON LAKE FRONT LOTS: A letter advising
the Council that some items in the old zo~ing'ordi'nance t~at should
have been carried into the new zoning ordinance'were left out. He is
recommending that the Planning Commission prepare an amendment to the.
new zoning code to add-back in any definitions which have been lost
as a result of typing or unintentionally over-166ked in bringing the
new code into force.
LETTERS FROM BUFFALO BITUMINOUS & HARDRIVES.REGARDING THE 1980
STREET PROJECT: Letters from both companies' regarding warranty'
work that will be done on certain streets from the 1980 Street
Project. The Council would like more information on 'the work
to be done on Bartlett Blvd. The~ would like to know the results
of tests done by Twin City Testing on that road.
L.M.C.D. APPOINTMENT TO LAKE MINNETONKA TASK FORCE: A letter from
the L.M.C.D. has designated Robert Tipton Brown as their representa-
tive on the task force with Executive Director Frank Mixa serving
as a resource person and alternate L.M.C.D. representative.
K. BRAD VAN NEST REQUEST FOR SUPPORT FOR HIS APPOINTMENT TO LAKE
MINNETONKA TASK FORCE: The Council felt that since there will be
three citizen'members selected from the Lake Minnetonka communities,
they should wait to see who comes forward. They would like to see
a good cross-representation oE persons on the Task Force.
Polston moved and Swenson seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-162 RESOLUTION TO ENCOURAGE AN ADEQUATELY BALANCED
TASK FORCES FOR ALL PARTS OF LAKE MINNETONKA
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
June 8, 1982
1982-83 DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT BUDGET: Total allocation for
1982-83 to the Downtown effort will be $55,745.
M. AGENCIES INVOLVED WITH THE LAKE: L.M.C.D., Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District and the DNR.
N. TONKA TOYS: An article on Tonka's Annual Meeting.
O. L.M.C.D. MINUTES ~ APRIL 28, 1982
P. ARTICLE "LEGAL ASPECTS OF PUBLIC WORKS"
Q. HENNEPIN COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY REQUEST FOR CONTRIBUTION
No action taken.
R. GAMBLING REPORT - AMERICAN LEGION POST 398 - May 1982
S. SCHOOL BOARD MINUTES - May 10 and May.18, 1982
T. ARTICLE WRITTEN BY THE CITY PROSECUTOR - "CIVIL LIABILITY FOR POLICE
ADMINISTRATION
LETTER FROM SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS, INC.: regarding a project to
coordinate and maximize transportation resources for the'-~lderly.
DAC MEETING DATE CHANGE: Change meeting date from June 9, 1982 to
June 16, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall.
Wo
BOARD O.F REVIEW MINUTES: Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion
to approve the minutes of the Board of Review held on June 1,"1982,
as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Xo
ASSESSMENT DEFERRALS:. The City must fil.e with the County Auditor a
resolution setting forth the amount of special assessments being
deferred by PID number.
Polston moved and Ulrick seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-163 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT DEFERRALS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to adjourn at ll:15 P.M. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Jon Elam, City Manager
Fran Clark, City Clerk
BILLS .... JUNE 8, 1982
Air Comm 90.00
Earl F. Andersen 59.60
Astleford Equip 101.40
Diane Arneson 132.50
Assn of Metrop Munic 15.00
Acro Minnesota 121.63
Albinson 484.00
Holly Bostrom 401.00
Gayle Burns 17.53
Carol Burlet 30.00
Janet Bertrand 28.18
Curtis 1000 281.74
Dependable Services 33.00
Determan Welding 772.80
Jori Elam 46.97
Glenwood Inglewood 46.40
Hayden Murphy 95.10
Wm Hudson 15.26
Internatl City Mgmt Assn 230.00
Kromer Co. 96.85
Doris Lepsch 15.00
Lowells 1.63
McCombs Knutson 745.00
MS Print 89.60
Marina Auto Supply 384.61
Mound Hdwe 7.16
John S. Plahn 18.74
Power Group Trust 73.25
Prairie Lawn & Garden 72.00
Brad Roy 16.OO
Suburban Chevrolet 2.18
St~r-~x Corp 454.79
Standard Spring 414.17
State Bank of Mound 14.40
Thrifty Snyder Drug .19.36
Tri State Drilling 417.50
Village chev 5.16
United Fire Fighters 25.00
Water Products 172.72
Westonka Sewer & Water 867.99
W~nner Industries 3.08
John Weiland (assess grant) 3,179.11
Widmer Bros. 2,139.75
Cobb Carpet Care 95.00
J.R. Dutton 42.21
Vincent Forsman 35.00
Robert Johnson 63.80
Mike McClelland 126,00
Mound Postmaster 406.08
Bud Orn 500.00
R.L. Youngdahl & Assoc 12,114.59
Howard Simar
Total Bills
Liquor Bills
BlaCkowiak & Sons
Bradley Exterminating
City of Mound
Mtka Refrig.
Real One Acquisition
Regal Window Cleaning
Butch's Bar Supply
City Club Distrib
Coca Cola Bottling
Day Distrib
East Side Bev.
Gold Medal Bev
Home Juice
Jude Candy
KOOl Kube Ice
The Liquor House
Midwest Wine
A.J. Ogle Co.
Pepsi Cola
Pogreba Distr|b
Thorpe Distr'ib
G~iggs, .Cooper
Johnson Bros.,
Old Peoria
Ed Phillips
Total Liquor Bi'lls
450.00
26,069.84
32.00
19.00
26.40
106.55
2,017.52
10.75
209.80
3,891.65
283.81
4,192.55
4,999.70
286.07
41.4O
31.20
24O.O0
871 .O8
1,641.65
2,210.32
279.90
3,427.45
5,153.75
1,291.65
1,241.68
618.14
1,548'.25
34,672.27
GRAND TOTAL--ALL BILLS
60,742.11
June 16, 1982
CITY of
MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
RE:
WETLANDS ORDINANCE
Last week following the first hearing on the Wetlands Ordinance, John Cameron
and I met with Joe Settles of Hennepin County Soil & Water Conservation
District. The outcome of that meeting was an elimination of the district
designation, i.e. 3, 4, 5 and in its place one general designation called
wetland. This is in line with the other wetland ordinances in the County
and in fact, more accurately deals with the designation process because
hardly any wetland can be entirely classified by a single designation. Most
are concentric with different designations for difficult locations within the
wetland.
It was felt that the Standards Section of the ordinance provides the City
with adequate manageme¢~t controls so that when a specific proposal comes
forward, we can require from the proposer a detailed analysis of the w~tland,
its' vegetation and soils, etc.
I think this designation eliminates the potential of fights over questions
of numerical designations and allows the ordinance to move forward.
Along that line, after the closing of the hearing, I think maybe we ought
to refer the ordinance back to the Wetlands Committee for another final
review before voting on it at the Council level.
Since we've gone this far, I don't see any pressure or rush to finish this
in the next week or so and we don't have any applications on file for permits
at this time.
JE:fc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING WETLAND AREAS
AND REGULATIONS AND PROVISION FOR FEES
The City of Mound d~es ordain:
The following additions are made to the Zoning Code of the City
and shall read as follows:
Section 23~1100. Wetlands - Purpose. The City Council bf Mound.
finds that there are wetlands within the City which, as part of the ecosystem,
are cri'tical to the health, safety and welfare of the land, animals and people
within the City~ These wetlands,, if preserved and maintained, constitute
important'physical, aesthetic, recreational and economic assets for existing
and future residents of the City. Therefore, the purposes of this district
are: ..
1. To provide for the protection, preservation, proper maintenance
and use of specified wetlands.
2. To'minimize the distrubance to them as to prevent damage from
.,
'excessive sedimentation, eutrophication or pollution.
3. .To prevent loss of fi'sh and other aquatic organisms, wildlife. and vegetation and the habitats of the same.
4. To provide for the protection of'the C.ity's fresh water supplies
from the dangers of drought', o~rdraft, pollution or mismanagement.
5.. To reduce the financial'burdens imposed uRon the community through
rescue and. relief efforts occasioned by the occupancy or use of
areas subject to periodic flooding and prevent loss off, ire,
property damage ahd the losses and risks associated with flood
conditions.
6. To preserve the location, character and'extent of natural drainage
courses,
Section 23.1105. Authority. Pursuant to.Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 462.357, 459.20,.378.31, Subd. Il, and Chapter 105, the City of Mound
does adopt district boundaries and a.':map showing said wetland bbundaries and
types; and regulations and controls for all designated wetlands within the City.
Section 23.110. Wetlands Boundaries.. The wetlands as her~rinafter
defined shall .ap~ly to wetland areas which are Specifically' delineated on the
Official Wetlands Map 'of the City of Mound which is attached hereto and adopted
as a part of this ordinance.
For purposes of determining the application of this wetlands ordinance to any
particular parcel of land or water the above referenced map shall be on file
in the office of the City Manager and'shall be available for inspection and
copying.
Section 23.1115. Wetland Permit. 'Except as hereinafter provided
in this ordinance, no person shall perform any development in a wetland with-
out first having obtained a wetland permit' (hereinafter referred to as "Permit''~
from the City of Mound~ Development shall include the construction, installat
or alteration of any structure; the clearing or altering of vegetation or land
and the division of land into two or more parcels.
/")/I
Section 23.1120. Exceptions.
by this ordinance shall not a~p~y to:
The Permit requirement established
Ao
Emergency work necessary to preserve life o~ property. When
emergency work'is performed under this section the person
performing it shall report.the pertinent facts relating to
the work to. the City Manager prior to the commencement of
work. The City Manager shall review the facts and determine
whether an emergency exists and shall, by written memorandum,
authorize the commencement of the emergency exception. 'A
person commencing'emergency work shall, within ten days
following the commencement of'that activity, apply for the
issuance of a Permit. The issuance thereof, may require the
permittee tO perform such work as ls determined to be
reasonably necessary to correct any impairment to the wetland
occasioned by such work.
B' 'The'repai. r ~.£ m~J=nt~nanc~ of any lawful use of land:e~,islzing on
the date of-adoption of thi.s ordinance.
Section 23.1125, Application.for Processing of Permit.
A. separate application for a Permit shall be made to the City
of Mound for each development activity for which a Permit i~S
required. Only one appl'ication need be. made 'for t~) or more
such acts which are to be done simultaneously on 'the same parcel.
The application shall include ~map of the site, a plan of the
proposed development and the estimated cos~ of development.
Other engineering data such as .surveys and other descriptive
information are also required. In order to determine the effects
of such development of the wetland the City Council may require
additional information including but not limited to the following:
1. A specific description of the type, amount and location of
the development.
2. A description of the ecological characteristics of the wetland.
3. A conservation .plan describing actions to be taken to
mitigate any detrimental effects of development.
4. Maps and data on soils, water table and flood capacity of the
wetland.
When the proposed'development includes the construction or
.alterations of a structure, two sets of plans thereof shall be
submitted with the application.
The permit application shall be processed according to the
procedures specified in Section 23.505 of the Zoning Ordinance
which pertains to processing of conditional use permits. The
Permit may be processed at the same time and in connection with
the processing of an application for a building permit or any
other permit required by ordinance of the City of Mound.
Section 23.1130. Permit Standards. No permit shall be issued unless
the City of Mound finds and determines that the proposed development complies
with the following standards:
Ao
Filling. A minimum amount of filling may be allowed when
necessary but in no case shall the following restrictions on
total amount of filling be exceeded. Since the total amount
of filling which can be permitted is limited, the City, when
considering Permit applications, shall consider the equal
apportionment of fill opportunity~o riparian land owners.
1. Total filling shall.not cause the total natural flood
storage capacity of ~the wetland to fall below the projected
vol'ume.of runoff from the whole developed wetland watershed .
generated by a six (6) inch rainfall in twenty-four (24)
hours.
2. Only fill free of chemical pollutants and organic wastes
may be used.
3. Wetlands'shall not be used for solid waste disposal.
Dredgi.ng. Dredging may .be allowed only when a boat channel is
..required for access 'to a navi.gable lake, for a marina or when it
will not have a substantial or significantly adverse effect upon
.the ecological and hydrological characteristics of the wetland.
Dredging, when allowed, shall be limited as follows:
1. It shall be located so as to maximize the acti'vity in the
areas o~ lowest Vegetation density.
.2. It shall not significantly change the water fl~ characteristics.
3. The s.ize of the dredged area'shall be limited to the absolute
minimum. ~
4. Disposal of'the dredged'material ~shall~..not result in 8
· significant~change..in the current flow, or in a substan~i'al~
destruction of vegetation, fish spawning areas or w~ter
pollution.
5. Work.in the wetland will.n~t be performed during th~ breeding
season of'water'fowl or fish spawning season.
6. Only one boat channel or marina shall be allowed per large-
'scale development.
7. In other residential .developments, dredging 'shall be located
s.o as to.provide for the use of boat channels and marinas by
two or more'adjacent property owners.
8. The width of the boat channel to be dredged shall be no more
thah the minimum required for the safe operation of boats
at minimum operating speed.
C. Discharges.
1. No.part of any sewage disposal system, requiring on-land or
in-ground disposal of waste shall be located closer than
150 feet from the normal high water mark unless it is proven
by the applicant t~at no effluent will immediately or
gradually reach the wetland because of existing characteristics
of the site or system.
2. Organic wast.e which would normally be disposed of at a solid
waste disposal site or which would normally be discharged into
a sewage disposal system or sewer shall not be directly or
indirectly discharged to the wetland.
3. Stormwater runoff from construction sites may be directed to
the wetland only when substantially free of silt, debris and
chemical pollutants and only"at rates which will not
disturb vegeta~tion or increase turbidity.
D. Building constraints.
1. The lowest floor level or basement elevation shall be at
least three feet above the seasonal high water level of
the wetland.
2. Development which will result in unusual road maintenance
costs or utility line breakages due to soil limitations,
including high frost.action shall not be permitted.
E. Vegetation. No wetland vegetation may be removed or altered
except that reasonable required for the placement of structures
and use of property.
Section 23.1135. Conditions. A.Permit may b~ approved subject to
compliance with reasonable conditions which are specifically set forth in the
Permit and are necessary to insure compliance with the requirements contained
in this district. Such conditions may include but at not limited to the
following:
1. Limitation'of the size, kind or character of the proposed work.
2. Require the construction of other structures.
3. Require replacement of.vegetation. -~
4. Establish required monitoring procedures and maintenance activity.
5. Stage the work over time. -
6. Require the alteration of the site design to ensure buffering.
7. Require the provision of a performance bond.
8. Require the conveyance to the City of Mound Or another public
entity of certain lands or interest therein. "
The dimensional requirements of the underlying zoning district(s) may be
modified in furtherance of the purpose of this ordinance by express condition
contained in the Permit. ~
Section 23.1140. Time of Permit, A permittee shall begin the work
authorized by the Permit within sixty (60) days from the date of issuance of
the Permit unless a different.date for the commencement of work is set forth
in the Permit. The' permittee shall complete the work authorized by the
Permit within the time limits, specified in the Permit which in' no event shall
exceed more than twelve (12) months from~ the date of issuance. The permittee
shall notify the Building Official at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to
commencement of work.
Should the work not be commenced as specified herein, the Permit shall become
void.
Ao
Extensions. If, prior to the date established for commencement
of work,.the permittee makes written request to the City Manager
or his disignated agent for an extension of time to commence the
work, setting forth the reasons for the required extension, the
administrator may grant such extension.
Bo
Renewals. A permit which has become void may be renewed at the
discretion of the City Council upon payment of a renewal fee.
If the C:ity Council does not grant such renewal a Permit for
such work may be granted only upon compliance with' the
procedures herein established for' an original app'lication.
Ce
Notice of completion. A permittee shall notify the City Manager
or his designated agent in writing when he has finished the work~.
No work shall be deemed ~o have been completed until approved in
writing by the City Manage'r or his designated agent following
such wPitten notification.
Do
Inspection. The City may require inspections of the work to be
made periodical.ly during the course thereof by a member of the
City of Mound staff and shall cause a final inspection to be'.
made following the completion of the work. The permittee shall
assist.the administrator in making such inspections.
Section 23.1145. Responsibility; Effect.
A. Responsibility. Neither the issuance of a Permit nor compliance
with the condi'tions'thereof, nor compliance with the provisions of
this'ordinance, shall relieve any persons from any responsibility
otherwise imposed by law for damage to persons or property. The
issuance of any pe'rmit hereunder shall not serve to impose any
1. iability on the City of Mound or its officers or employees for
injury or damage to persons or property. A Permit issued
.pursuant to this'ordinance shall not relieve the.p~rmittee of
the responsibility of complyin~gith any other requirements
established by law, regulation'or ordinance.
B. Special assessment. The land within a designated wetlands distri
.area for which a development or other-restrictive easement is
conveyed to the City shall not be subject to special assessments
levied by:the City to pay the costs or publi'c water, sewer,
cur~, gutter or other public municipal improvements 'for which
such assessments are.authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429.
Variance. The City Council may.authorize in specific cases
foil.owing appeal-and hearing a variance from the provisions of
this ordinance where the literal application of the ordinance
wou'ld result in substantial inequitable hardship to an applicant
property Owner~ I~n assessing hardship the City Council shall
balance the severity of the physical, social and economic effects
of the.literal application .against the interests of the City in
effecting the purposes of this ordinance as expressed 'above.
Economic considerations alone.shall not constitute a hardship if
a .reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the
ordinance.. No variance may be granted which would allow any use
that is prohibited in ~he zoning district in which the subject
property is.located. A variance shall be granted in writing
accompanied by specific findings of fact as to the necessity for
the grant of the variance and its specific provisions. A variance
.request shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 23.506 of the Mound City Zoning Ordinance.
Section 23.1150. Fees. The City Council may establish by
resolution fees for rezonings, variances, permits, condition use permits,
special permits or requiring administrative t
under any section of the zoning ordinance.
me or public expenditures
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Adopted by the City Council
Published'in Official Newspaper
S ~c)
Sll
.R24W
R23W
S7
S15
Tl17N
S ~
~0
N 14
N ~-3'.
12 .\
N"13
'Sq3
5
2A
SqE!
T117N
"lB
3
N EZE$
N
15.
W
N 30
14 '
R23TM
WET LANDS MAP
JUNE 15,198j
LEGEND
'~ ' WET 'LAF~DS ''"'"" °¢ "'
LAW OFFICES
William F. Kelly.
AND ASSOCIATES
WILLIAM f. KELLY
JOHN C, SANDERS
DENNIS J. ORKE
KENNETH N. POTTS
MARK W. KELLY
351 SECOND STREET
EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331
(612) 474-5977
June 10, 1982
Mr. Jon Elam
City Manager
City of Mound Administrative Officer
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Wetland Inspection
Dear Mr. Elam:
At the June 8th public hearing on the proposed wetland ordinance
held by the Mound City Council it was suggested that as a method
of determining the proper classification of my client's property
possibly the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District could
be requested to make an investigation and recommendation of the
proper classification under the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Services
Classification Scheme. We indicated that we felt that such ~
review would be to the interest of the property owned by our
client Priscilla Anderson and hoped that the city would agree to
persue the same.
We contacted Mr. Joel Settles of the Hennepin Soil and Water Con-
servation District and he has indicated he would make an on site
inspection of my client's property upon the city making such a
request. The purpose of such an inspection would be to render his
expert opinion on the proper classification of the land owned by
Mrs. Anderson. We would, on behalf of Mrs. Anderson, request the
City of Mound to contact Mr. Settles whose phone number is 473-0249,
and arrange for an immediate on site inspection of the parcel known
as Lot 59, Auditor's Subdivision No. 168, Hennepin County.
I am sure the members of the Mound Council do not wish to adopt an
amendment to the zoning ordinance which improperty classifies land
in the City of Mound.
In the event that you do not have on file the publication published
by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1135 U. S. Post Office Building,
St. Paul, Minnesota addressing the question of what is and what is
not wetlands and how they are classified purusant to the U. S. Fish
and Wildlife Services' Classification scheme, I am enclosing such a
WILLIAM F. KELLY AND ASSOCIATE~. A'I~rORNEYS
Mr. Jon Elam
June 10, 1982
Page 2.
pamphlet for your study and review. This is the same classifi-
cation scheme and definitions as used in the proposed Mound ordinance
and shown in the photographed illustrations. The Mound ordinance
has classified my client's property as type 4. I think you will
agree the photographs of a typical type 4 shows no relation to my
client's property. May I call your attention to the picture of
type 7, a photograph of which is shown in the pamphlet, which
is similar to the property owned by my client.
As you can readily understand, the regulations and restrictions
which would be appropriate for a type 4 may not be appropriate
for a type 7 and of course all properties which would fall within
type 7, we assume, would be treated similarily in the event type
7 is included within the proposed wetlands ordinance.
We are most anxious to be included in any discussion concerning
our client's property and we wish to cooperate with the city in
every way possible.
WFK:mw
Enclosures
Sincerely,
C.Co
Curtis A. Pearson
Priscilla Anderson
Charles P. Smith
Joel Settles
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR
HAROLO E. DAHLIN
LARRY L. HANSON
JACK E. GILL
THEODORE D. KEMNA
JOHN W. EMONO
KENNETH E. ADOLF
WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT
R. SCOTT HARRI
GERALD L. BACKMAN
R. MARK KOEGLER
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC,
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS
ANO SOIL TESTING
(612) 938-7601 · 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH · HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
June 2, 1982
Mr. William F. Kelly
William F. Kelly and Associates
351 Second Street
Excelsior, Minnesota 55331
Subject:
Lot 59 Auditor's Subdivision
No. 168
City of Mound, Minnesot~
Dear Mr. Kelly:
We have reviewed the wetland classifications proposed by
the City of Mound for the above named property and offer the
following comments.
First, the area should not be separated into two different
wetland classifications. By definition, a Class 41 wetland has
three feet or more of water at times. The area proposed as
Class 4 can not have three feet of water over it due to the
outlet pipe elevation. The undergrowth and tree cover is the
same in both areas designated as two separate wetland types
which would indicate that the two areas are similar and should
be classified the same.
Second, the definitions of the wetland types proposed by
the City of Mound for this property appear to be in error.
By definition, a Type 31 wetland is inland shallow fresh
marshes. The soil is usually waterlogged during the growing
season; often it is covered with as much as six inches or more
of water. Vegetation includes grasses, bulrushes, spikerushes,
and various other marsh plants such as cattails, arrowheads,
pickerelweed, and smartweeds. Common representatives in the
North are reed, whitetop, rice cutgrass, carex, and giant
burreed. In the Southeast, maindencane, sawgrass, arrowhead,
and pickerelweed are characteristic. These marshes may nearly
fill shallow lake basins or sloughs, or they may border deep
marshes on the landward side. They are also common as seep areas
on irrigated lands.
~ SCHOELL & MADSON.,~NC.
Mr. ~Villiam Fi Kelly
William F. Kelly and Associates
Page Two
June 2, 1982
By definition, a Type 41 wetland is inland deep fresh
marshes. The soil is covered with six inches to three feet or
more of water during the growing season. Vegetation includes
cattails, reeds, bulrushes, spikerushes, and wildrice. In open
areas, pondweeds, nkiads, coontail, watermilfoils, waterweeds,
duckweeds,' waterlilies, or spatterdocks may occur. Water-
hyacinth and waterprimroses form surface mats in some localities
in the Southeast. These deep marshes may almost completely
fill shallow lake basins, potholes, limestone sinks, and sloughs,
or they may border open water in such depressions.
In my opinion, the area, if it were to be classified a
wetland would more likely fall under the classification for a
Type 61'or Type 71. Type 6 is shrub swamps. The soil.-is usually
waterlogged during the growing season, and is often covered with
as much as six inches of water. Vegetation includes alders,
willows, buttonbush, dogwoods, and swamp-privet. Shrub swamps
occur mostly along sluggish streams and occasionally on flood
plains. They are used to a limited extent for nesting and feeding
in the North and for roosting and feeding in some o£ the
Mississippi Alluvial Valley States. Elsewhere, shrub swamps are
little used except in a few special situations. Type 7 is
wooded swamps. The soil is waterlogged at least to within a
few inches of its surface during the growing season, and is ~
often covered with as much as one foot of water. Wooded swamps
occur mostly along sluggish streams, on flood plains, on flat
uplands, and in very shallow lake basins. In the North, trees
include tamarack, arborvitae, black spruce, balsam, red maple,
and blask ash. In the South, water oak, overcup oak, tupelo gum,
swamp black gum, and cypress are dominant. In the Northwest,
western hemlock, red alder, and willows are common. Northern
evergreen swamps usually have a thick ground covering o~ mosses.
Deciduous swamps frequently support beds of duckweeds, smartweeds,
and other herbs.
Very truly yours,
WREngelhardt:mkr
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
1
Wetlands of the United States, Their Extent and Their Value
to Waterfowl and Other Wildlife by Samuel P. Shaw, C. Gordon
Fredine, Circular 39 Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Depart-
ment of the Interior 1956, Reprint 1971.
June 16, 1982
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
Enclosed is 'the list of delinquent utility bills for June.
JE: fc
/~? ? /
Account #
Delinquent Utility Bills
Amount
6-16-82
22 235 2221 61
22 238'4898 10
22 238 4936 11
22 238 4941 11
22 238 5055 91
22 244 5019 31
22 259 4841 91
22 2594969 01
22. 259~5237 91
22 259 5628 91
22 259 5656 01
22 268 5909 41
22 286 6040 91
22 307 6177 31
22 310'2600 21
.22 310 2630 91
22 310 269521
22 310 2710 91
22 310 3012 91
22 310 3198 61
22 313 6324 91
22 316 2882 31
22 321 3005 01
22 343 2066 71
22 343 2281 21
22 343 2420 61
22 373 5031 51
22 373 5063 81
22 385 5070 71
22 388 5049 51
22 397 2524 11
64.84
136.84
92.47
113.52J
51.88
84.84
408.8o j
134.70
111.19
47.75
69.46
77.02
93.19
135.72
116.64
69.56
$3,365.33
A.THOMAS WURST
GERALD T. CARROLL
CURTIS A. PEARSON
THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD
ALBERT FAULCONER ~Z
JAMES D. LARSON
LAW OFFICES
WUrSt, CARROLL ~ PEARSON
IlO0 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
June 3, 1982
TELEPHONE
(61~) 338-8911
Mr. Jon Elam
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Ordinances
Dear Jon:
Pursuant to Bruce Wold's memo of May 18, 1982 and your direction
to me to prepare these ordinances, I have reviewed them and have
tried to put them in proper form and number them according to our
existing code. Desyl is concerned by some of the sections in our
code and I agree with her that the ordinances need to be recodified.
This has been a project put on the back burner for the past 16
years and there never seems to be enough money to do the job
properly.
I have Desyl's note of March 1 where she indicates some concern
about the intoxicating liquor section and she refers to Chapter 31
of the code. I would refer her and the police to Chapter 11 of the
city code which deals with intoxicating liquors, and the types of
restrictions that she is concerned about will be found in Section
11.50, Subdivisions 12, 15, 16 and 17. There may be other sections
of Chapter 11 which will also be helpful to the police and to the
prosecutor as it relates to intoxicating liquor.
Desyl also mentioned the penalty provisions of Section 70.01 and
she must have an old book because Section 71.09 establishes the new
penalty provisions and repeals Section 70.01 of the city code. I
therefore do not find it necessary to change that section.
As to the ordinances themselves,.I am sending a copy to Desyl and I
hope you will provide a copy to Bruce Wold so that he may examine it
along with you to determine if we have the proposed ordinances in
the right sections and if they are consistent with the materials
submitted to my office. I have not included the first three sections
under what is referred to as false information because they are
already in the code as Sections 52.11, 12 and 13.
/,2. 73
WURST, CARROLL & PEARSON
Mr. Jon Elam
Page 2
June 3, 1982
Jon, Desyl and Bruce, I hope these are ready for the council's
attention and if there is agreement among you people, they can
be submitted to the council at your earliest possible date.
City Attorney
CAP: ms
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Desyl Peterson
(Dictated but not read by Mr. Pearson)
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTIONS 46.13, 51.40, 51.45,
51.50, 55.07, 55.08, 52.135 AND AMENDING SECTION
52.14 RELATING TO UNNECESSARY ACCELERATION OF MOTOR
VEHICLES, PUBLIC NUISANCE NOISES, PARTICIPATION IN
NOISY PARTIES, DISTURBANCE OF THE PEACE, ENTERING
UPON LAND, WINDOW PEEPING AND GIVING FALSE INFOR-
MATION TO POLICE
The City of Mound does ordain:
Section 46.13 if hereby added to the City Code and shall read
as follows:
Section 46.13. Unnecessary Acceleration. No person shall
start or accelerate any motor vehicle with an unnecessary exhibition
of speed on any public or private roadway, driveway, or parking lot
or other driving surface within the City limits. Prima facie evidence
of such unnecessary acceleration of speed shall be unreasonable
squealing or screeching sounds emitted by tires or the throwing of
sand or gravel by the tires of said vehicle or both.
Section 51.40 is hereby added to the City'Code and shall read
as follows:
Section 51.40. Public Nuisance Noises Prohibited. It shall
be unlawful for any person to make, continue, or cause to be made or
continued any loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise or any noise which
either annoys, disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, repose,
health, peace, or safety of others within the limits of the City. Any
police officer may order the offending person to abate the noise nuisance.
Any person failing to abate the noise nuisance after being ordered to
do so by a police officer shall be guilty of a violation of this Chapter.
The following acts, among others, are declared to be nuisance
noises in violation of this Article but said enumeration shall not be
deemed to be exclusive.
Radios, Phonographs, Television, etc. The use, operation,
or permitting the playing, use of operation of any radio
receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, television,
or other machine or device for the production or reproduc-
tion of sound in such a manner as to disturb the peace,
quiet and comfort of the neighboring inhabitants or at any
time at a louder volume than is necessary for convenient
hearing for the person or persons who are in the room,
vehicle or chamber in which such machioe or device is
operated who are voluntary listeners thereto. Additionall~,
no music produced or reproduced outside of an enclosed
structure shall be amplified byany artificial means at
a volume louder than is necessary for convenient listening.
Yelling,' Shouting, etc. Yelling, shouting, hooting,
whistling, or singing on the public streets, particularly
.between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. or at any
time or place so as to annoy or disturb the quiet, comfort,
or repose of persons in any office, dwelling, hotel, or
other type of residence, or of any persons in .the vicinity.
Animals, 'Birds, etc. The keeping of any animal or bird
Which b~ causing frequent or long continued noise shall
disturb the comfort or repose of any persons in the vicinity.
4. Exhaust.
The discharge into the open air of the exhaust of any
steam engine, stationary internal combustion engine,
motor boat, or motor vehicle except through a muffle=
or other device which will effectively prevent loud or
explosive noises therefrom.
Mufflers of the type commonly known as "Mollywood
Mufflers" shall not be permitted.
follows:
5. General - Ail loud or unusual noises and annoying vibrations
which offend the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary
sensibility.
Section 51.45 is hereby added to the City Code and shall read as
Section 51.45. PartiCipation in Noisy Parties or Gatherings.
No person shall congregate because of, or participate in,
any party or gathering of people from which noise emanates
of sufficient volume or of such~ nature to disturb the peace,
quiet, or repose of other persons.
A police officer may order all persons present other than
the owners or tenants of the building or place to immediately
disperse. Any person who shall refuse to leave after being
ordered to do so by a police officer shall be guilty of a
violation of this Chapter.
Any owner or tenant of the building or place who has know-
ledge of the disturbance and fails to immediately abate
said disturbance shall be guilty of a violation of this
Chapter.
Section 51.50 is hereby added to the City Code and shall read
as follows:
!?
Section 51.50. ~Disturbance of the Peace. No person, either
individually or in concert with others shall disturb the peace and
quiet of any family, neighborhood, or public or private place.
Sections 55.07 and 55.08 are hereby added to the City Code and
shall read as follows:
Section 55.07. 'En~ering'Upon Land.
Subd. 1. Consent. It is unlawful for any person to enter
upon the %and of another without claim of right or the
written consent of the owner or of one who has the right
to give consent, except in an emergency situation.
Subd. 2. Refusal to leave. It is unlawful for any person
in violation of subd. 1 to refuse to leave land upon order
of a police officer, if the person is lawfully on the land,
to refuse to exhibit the written consent required by subd. 1.
Section 55.08. Window Peeping. No person shall go on or over
property owned or occupied by another for the purpose of~looking or
peeping into any window, door, skylight or other opening in a house,
room or building to observe the actions of occupants of any such house,
room or building, nor shall any person, in any public or private place,
enter a toilet designated for the use by the opposite sex, or look into
any window or other opening for any indecent, immoral or unlawful
purpose.
Section 52.135 is hereby added to the City Code and shall read
as follows:
Section 52.135. Communicating False Information. No person
shall in any case or under any circumstances, not otherwise provided
for, willfully communicate either orally or in writing or by any other
method, to a city officer in discharging or attempting to discharge the
duties of his office, any false or incorrect name or identity, or upon
lawful demand and reasonable grounds of the city officer refuse to
correctly identify oneself.
Section 52.14 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 52.14. Giving False Information to Police. No person
shall give any false information to the 'police about any crime or mis-
demeanor that has been committed,~nor shall any person report or cause
to be reported to any state, county, or City law enforcement agency or
officer, by any means of communication, any felony, gross misdemeanor,
or misdemeanor knowing that no such felony, gross misdemeanor, or
misdemeanor has been committed.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
Adopted by City Council .
Published Official Newspaper
CITY of MOUND
June 16, 1982
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
Attached is a v~r~ general resolution allowing the Council to go on
general record regarding the Senior Citizen Housing Project. No sites
are specified. I believe we covered that last week.
JE: fc
/,,??~
HENNEPIN
IL
OFFICE OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
C-2353 Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487
(612) 348-6418
June 14, 1982
Mr. John Elam, City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 202 Housing Proposal/Supporting Resolution
Dear Mr. Elam:
It would be beneficial to the West Tonka 202 application if the City
Council could at it's next meeting consider the accompanying resolution,
as a demonstration of local political support.
Should the Council elect to support the resolution, please provide John
Rockeford, Community Development Corporation, 328 West Sixth Street, St.
Paul, MN 55102, with a certified copy from the application package.
If you nave any questions, please contact me at 348-5859.
Sincerely,
Senior Planner
pb
Encl osu re
cc: John Rockeford
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunlh/employer
RESOLUTION NO. 82-
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Mound,'Minnesota, desires to advance elderly housing
opportunities for its senior citizens, and
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
it is in the best interests of the City of Mound to jointly
cooperate with communities of Orono, Spring Park and Minnetrista
in such housing efforts, and
the City of Mound has approved the establishment of the Westonka
Elderly Housing Task Force and has appointed a representative to
serve on said committee, and
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Mound supports the submission
of a 202 mortgage application, for the construction of an assisted elderly
housing development in the City of Mound, Minnesota, to service the needs
of the West Lake Minnetonka area.
FURTHERMORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Mound supports the Westonka
Area Housing Project and recognizes it as an innovative use of limited funds
in meeting elderly housing needs of the area.
CITY of MOUND
June 16, 1982
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
Since our meeting in April on the water meter problem, Greg and I have
looked at all the alternatives that could help Mound; both from a day to
day maintenance standpoint and cost. The answer appears to be the purchase
of Badger Meters because:
1. A good deal of the City already has Badger outside readers; and
parts are on hand.
2. They work off a two wire system, thus we won't have to rewire all
the newer homes to take care of the Neptune meters.
3. The cost of the Badger meters is $41.00 and we will receive a
credit of $7.48 for each Neptune meter we replace, making the
net cost $33.52. The Neptune price after an $18.00 credit is
$3~.50.
4. The use of the Neptune system to tie into Cable would not be
possible for years to come; the use of the tape to record readings
and convert'them to the City computer is also not possible, in
part because none of the other Cities on Logis are using a system
like Neptunes'
5. To insure we are making the correct decision, I would like to start
our program by purchasing:
250, Model 25 Bronze, 3/4' x 7½" Meters.
That cost will be $8380.00 and will be paid from the Water Fund.
This will provide us with enough meters to fix those that are presently not
workin.g, which will probably consume the rest of the Summer.
As this problem gets resolved, perhaps we can look at the broader issues
involved with outside reading, i.e. self-reading, etc.
JE:fc
CITY of
MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO:
FROM:
CITY COUNCIL
JON ELAM, CITY MANAGER
The City has had a real problem with the Neptune water meters they
purchased four years ago.
At this time we have at least 250 meters out of order and in need of
repair. Our failure rate for the meters exceeds 20%.
Clearly we have got to do something, otherwise the Water Department
crews will be tied up almost full time repairing meters they have
already installed once. I thought this would be a good chance for
the Greg's to show you the specific meter problems and what ideas
and suggestions we have for solving this serious problem. We need
your support and ideas as well, of course.
JE:fc
Badger Meter, lnc. Flow Products Division
4545 West Brown Deer Road
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53223 (414) 355-0400
Mr. Jon Elam, City Manager
Water Department
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
April 6, 1982
Subject: Price Quotation
Dear Mr. Elam:
At the request of our sales representative, Tim McCool, we
are pleased to quote the following:
250 Mdl 25 Bronze, 3/4"x7½", w/ROM, L/C
$41.00-
500 Mdl 25 Bronze, 3/4"x7½", w/ROM, L/C
38.95
Trade-in value for 5/8" Bronze meters
7.48
Terms are net 30 days. Freight will be prepaid and allowed
all orders of $1000.00 or more.
"Prices are firm for acceptance within 60 days. and an
order placed within that time period will indicate ac-
ceptance. Either party shall have the option of price
renegotiation six months from the date of the order."
Attached is bulletin RD-2, descriptive and illustrative of the
meters we are quoting on.
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity of placing this quotation
before you and hope it meets with your approval.
Ver~.,.truly yours,
A.[ J. Derse
N6'r~thern Region Sales Manager
AJD:jg
Att.
cc: Tim McCool
ad jer Recorda l':... Sized Righ',.
Recordall disc meters quickly pay
for themselves by increasing water
revenue. The reason for this is a
totally new approach to meter sizing.
In developing Record~ll, Badger
took into account evidence that
water meters generally have been
oversized and that a substantial
amount of water has not been ade-
quately measured at Iow flows.
Recordall was designed, therefore,
to improve accuracy and revenue in
a"practical" flow range that closely
matches typical usage.
The new sizing concept has become
so firmly established that Badger
now offers Recordall disc meters
with bronze housings for certain
specialized applications in addition
to its thermoplastic Recordalls for
residential and small commercial
installations. The bronze meters are
designated as Model 25 (plus 5),
Model 70 (plus 30) and Model 120
(plus 40).
With Recordall disc meters, the
model number corresponds to the
upper limit of the "practical" flow
range. The plus factor designates
reserve capacity for intermittent
use. Thus, the Model 25 (plus 5) is
intended primarily for applications
up to 25 gpm, but will function
satisfactorily up to 30 gpm.
Bronze Model 25 meets or exceeds
Standard C-700 of the American
Water Works Association for
materials and disc nutations in a
%" meter. It is designed for water
utilities that prefer bronze for pit
settings and certain other applica-
tions, even though it does not offer
the initial economy, corrosion resis-
tance and long-term maintenance
savings of Recordall plastic meters.
Except for housings and bottom
plates, the bronze and plastic
versions of Recordall Model 25 use
the same major components,
including registers, hoods and
measuring chambers. With a 71/2
laying length, bronze Model 25 is
interchangeable with a conventional
%" meter, a plastic Model 15
Recordall or a pl~ti6 Model
Models 70 and 120 are for applica- '
tions which require larger capacities
than the plastic meters presently
available. They are offered in a wide
selection of laying lengths and end
connections (see chart on back
page).
As shown on this same chart, the
Recordall product line generally
gives your water utility a choice of
two or more disc meters in the same
laying length, but with different
capacities. That way, you pay only
for the capacity you need--not more
than you need. And you don't sacri-
fice accuracy and revenue at Iow
flows.
Recordall Design Imp
Recordall's innovative sizing con-
cept and certain design features
help tO improve meter accuracy,
especially in the Iow flow range
where other meters are least effi-
cient. Here are three major reasons
for the high accuracy performance:
--Gears and many other compo-
nents are molded of lightweight, but
durable plastics which "run
smooth" and impose very little load
on the measuring elements.
--An O ring on the chamber's outlet
port effectively seals the area
between chamber and meter
housing.
roves Accuracy
--A powerful magnetic coupling is
used to drive the meter's regis.ter,
thus eliminating the friction load
and drag associated with stuffing
box meters.
As shown in the accompanying
graph, AWWA standards for a 11/2"
meter call for 95% accuracy at mini-
mum test flow of 11/2 gpm and 98.5
to 101.5% accuracy above 5 gpm.
Recordall Model 70 beats that hands
down with 97% accuracy at % gpm
and 98.5 to 101.5% starting as Iow
as 11/4 gpm.
GPM ~/~ 3
AWWA STANDARD 1" METER
-- 98.5 // to 101.5%
//
5O
Model 25 Recordall with Optional
Read-o-Matic for Remote Reading
GPM % 1V4
GPM
95%
RECORDALL 70 (PLUS 30) 70 ~00
98.5 to 101.5°/.
I
Practical Use Range
AWWA STANDARD 1~/~" METER
100
98.5 //to 101 5%
Space Limitations Prevent Reproduction of This Chart in Exact Scale
E]97% Recordall
95 % AWWA
E98.5 to 101 5°0
To De iver ore Wa er Revenue
RECORDALL FEATURES
MAGNETIC DRIVE
Operates through top wall
of meter housing. No gears
in water. No packing glands.
SEALED REGISTER
Protected against moisture
and corrosion. Locks onto
meter with clamp ring.
CORROSION
RESISTANCE
Gears, charn'bers and many
other parts molded of
durable thermoplastic..
EASY SERVICING
Chambers and disc assem-
blies can be replaced with-
out removing meter from
line. Meter components can
be readily cleaned with
detergent and brush.
FLOW FINDER
S.rn.all trickles of water
cause Flow Finder to spin.
k Helps signal plumbing
s.
REMOTE REGISTER
Badger Read-o-Matic avail-
able as optional register for
installations where access
is difficult. IL-,.,-Jl
SPECIFICATIONS
MODEL 25 (PLUS 5) FLOW RANGE
Minimum test flow: ~A gpm, accuracy 97% or better.
Normal test flow limits: 1/2 to 30 gpm, accuracy of 98.5
to 101.5%.
Normal operating capacity: 25 gpm.
Safe maximum capacity: 30 gpm.
Totalizer capacities: Up to 10 million gallons, 1 million
cu. ft., 10,000 or 100,000 cu. meters.
MODEL 70 (PLUS 30) FLOW RANGE
Minimum test flow: % gpm, 97% accuracy.
Normal test flow limits: 11/4 to 100 gpm, 98.5 to 101.5%
accuracy.
Normal operating capacity: 70 gpm.
Safe maximum capacity: 100 gpm.
Totalizer capacities: Up to 100 million gallons, 10 million
cu. ft., 100,000 or I million cu. meters.
MODEL 120 (PLUS 40) FLOW RANGE
Minimum test flow: 11/4 gpm, 97% accuracy.
Normal test flow limits: 2~/2 to 160 gpm, 98.5 to 101.5%
accuracy.
Normal operating capacity: 120 gpm.
Safe maximum capacity: 160 gpm.
Totalizer capacities: Same as Model 70.
MATERIALS
Housings: bronze.
Bottom plates: cast iron standard, bronze optional on
Model 25; bronze only on Models 70 and 120.
Chamber, partition plate, thrust roller, gear train, screen,
register lid and clamp ring: all molded of thermo-
plastic.
Nutating disc: thermoplastic on Model 25, hard rubber
on Models 70 and 120.
Chamber O Ring: Buna N.
Thrust roller insert, disc and magnet spindles: 316 stain-
less steel.
Magnets: Barium ferrite.
OPERATING PRESSURES: 150 psi maximum.
OPERATING TEMPERATURES: 38°F to 80°F.
9200 SHELBYVILL£ RD., SUITE 625 · LOUISVILLE, KY. ,40222
April 20, 1982
Mr. Jon Elam, City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Mn. 55364
Dear Mr. Elam,
I thought it would be a good idea to recap the things which we have discussed
so far concerning our products.
Neotune is very sorry that Mound has experienced problems with our odometer
type remote reading equipment. Let me assure you that Neptune is very con-
cerned and is continually testing and trying to improve this equipment. This
equipment does carry a ben year warranty on the register and a five year
warranty on the outside odometer.
We have also discussed the availability of our AR~ (Automatic Reading and
Billing) System. Neptune has had this equipment on the market since 1965.
There are approximately 500 water utilities presently using this system.
ARB offers many advantages over the remote equipment you are presently using.
The big advantage is the direct interrogation of the register in the basement
by our reading devices. This insures you that you are getting the actual
meter reading every time. The fact that we can put all of the meter readings
on tape automatically and then feed the tape into the computerto.print the
bills automatically appeals to many utilities who are computerized. Also
the central meter reading adaptability is becoming more important~ev~ry day.
Neptune presently has two cable tv projects and two telephone projects under-
way in which we are reading meters over the cable and telephone lines. The
ARB register is being utilized in both cases. I have attached a copy of a
comparison of both systems and also a listing of benefits of the ARB total
system for your information.
Neptune has offered to change your Neptune meters over to the ARB equipment
for $18.00 per meter. This is a much reduced price compared to the $34.50
normally charged our customers for this equipment.
I believe I have covered everything discussed to this point. Please contact
me if you would like to discuss this further.
Territory Manager
ARB II - TOTAL SYSTEM
Features and Benefits
1)
REMOTE READING
~ Eliminates lock-outs and call backs
" - More readings per day
. r Maintains customer's privacY:
.- .Eliminates estimated bills
AUTOMATIC READING AND RECORDING
- Makes meter reading 2 to $ times faster resulting in lower- '.
rea~n-~ costs '"" ':
- Ends manual entry mistakes to insure accurate billing" .'," "" ·
- Prevents curb readings '
AUTOMATIC BILL' PROCESSING
Shortens billing cycle and improves cash flow
4)
- Reduces billing costs by permitting re-assignment of billing
clerks
- Eliminates clerical errors in billing for'better customer
relations
- Comprehensive reports provide managemen: with current data for'
decision making
CENTRAL READING ADAPTABILITY
- Since ARB II adapts to existing telephone reading, systems,
customer avoids obsqlescence. ..- ,
2-1~ire Remote vs ARB II System
Comparison of Benefits
Feature or Benefit
2-wire
remote
ARB II
System
1) eliminates lock-outs and call backs
2) ease of installation
3) power requirements
4) special inventory requirements
$) outside reading always agrees with
inside reading
6) er~or detection of malfunction in
installation
7)' eliminates manual entry mistakes by
meter reader
8) prevents curb readings
9) reduces billing personnel by
eliminating manual entry of data
.10) eliminates manual entry billing
errors
11} shortens billing cycle and improves
cash flow
yes
2 connections
self_
"generating
remotes must
be stocked by
size meter
two s~parate
mech. elements
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
3 connections
reading
eqdipment
any receptacle
goes with any
register
direct
interrogation.
yes
yes
yes.
yes
yes
yes
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
June 15, 1982
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Jon Elam, City Manager
Licensing Department
Renewal of Club Licenses and Class A and B
Liquor Licenses
Club licenses and Class A (On Sale Restaurant) and
Class B (On Sale - Sunday Sale) Liquor Licenses expire
the last day of June each year. They are:
Minnetonka Post 398 American Legion - Club
Chamberlain-Goudy VFW Post 5113 - Club
Donnie's on the Lake - Class A and B Liquor
Surfside, Inc. - Class A and B Liquor
Renewals of the Club Licenses and of the Class A and B
Liquor License for Donnie's on the Lake have been
received.
Copies of the renewals have been forwarded to the Police
Chief for his recommendation.
Marjorie Stutsman
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
June 16, 1982
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
RE:
STORM SEWER -PEABODY AVENUE
Enclosed is a petition that the City has received for a storm sewer extension
from the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Sherwood Shores.
What is happening is the water from this area of County Road llO drains into
a catch basin where Peabody Ave. is platted. The water then rushes across
the land toward a boat channel that has been dug into the vacated street.
Since this waterway has never been dug out, the result is that a great deal
of erosion has taken place, with the resulting sediment flowing into the
channel causing it to silt up.
What needs to be done is:
1. A pipe 12-24" dug in from the catch basin to the channel, OR
2. A cement swail put in around and through all the trees (and there
are dozens).
The cost of the project would probably be paid by the affected residents,
Hennepin County and the City since it does help drain out adjacent City
streets. The percentage of each would be based on the total watershed
each owns.
If the Council wishes to go forward, the next step would be to authorize
the preparation of a Preliminary Engineering Report. Then, based on that,
we can go from there.
JE:fc
PETITION FOR CURB AND GUTTER, PAVING, AND STORM SEWERS
TO: The Honorable City Council of Mound:
We, the undersigned property owners, respectfully request the construction
of storm drains, Dx~~X~ on Peabody Ave.
(street to be improved)
from Connmerce Blvd. (cry ~110) to Lake ~iinnetonka
(Note: If property is in joint ownership, both husband and wife should si~n)
Lot & Block
Lot 1, Block l,
Subdivis ion
Sherwood Shores
,~ Signature
Oll ([ rod.
June 16, 1982
CITY
MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
Enclosed are the overlay bids for the 1982 Street Program covering:
1. Priest Lane
2. Rustic Ridge Road
3. Gumwood Road
4. Langdon Lane (north of County Road 15)
The Engineer will be in attendance to review these quotations and made a
recommendation.
JE:fc
Advertisement for Bids
Mound, Minnesota
1982 Street Overlay Rroject
File #6468
Sealed proposals will be received, publicly opened, and read aloud at lO:O0
A.M., Oune 18, 1982 at the City Hall, Mound, Minnesota, for street
construction. Work consists of approximately 440 tons of bituminous mixture.
The proposals will be considered by the City Council at their meeting on 3une
22, 1982.
All proposals shall be addressed to:
Oon Elam, City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
And shall be securely sealed and shall be endorsed on the outside with the
statement "RROROSAL FOR STREET OVERLAY RROOECT" and shall be on the Proposal
Form bound into the specifications for the project.
Copies of the plans, specifications, and other proposed contract documents
are on file with the City Clerk and at the office of McCombs-Knutson
Associates, Inc., 12800 Industrial Rark Boulevard, Rlymouth, Minnesota 55441.
Plans and specifications for use in preparing bids may be obtained at the
office of the above address of the Engineers upon deposit of $20.00. The full
amount of the deposit for one set will be refunded to each bidder who has made
a deposit and has filed a bid with the Owner, upon return of the plans and
specifications within ten (10) days after the bids are opened.
'Each bidder shall file with his bid an acceptable certified check or
bidder's bond in an amount of not less than ten percent (10%) of the total
amount of his bid. No bid may be withdrawn within sixty (60) days after the
bids are opened.
The City of Mound reserves the right to reject any and all bids and waive
any informalities or irregularities therein.
CITY OF HOUND
ATTEST:
Dated:
Fran Clark, City Clerk
gune 2, 1982
By: Rock Lindlan, Mayor
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
1982 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT
JUNE 18, 1982
BID TABULATION
BIDDER
ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION
14561 'JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE
ROAD
APPLE VALLEY, MN. 55124
AERO ASPHALT
P. O. BOX 217
3522 SIOUX DRIVE
HAMEL, MN. 55340
ASPHALT PAVING MATERIAL
12924 JUNE TERRACE
MINNETONKA, MN. 55343
BUFFA!LO BITUMINOUS
BLACKTOP CONTRACTORS
BUFFALO, MN. 55313
HARDRIVES,INC.
BOX 579
ST. CLOUD, MN.
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP.
P. O. BOX 338
HOPKINS, MN. 55343
WM. MUELLER & SONS
NORTHWEST ASPHALT
1451 COUNTY ROAD 89
SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379
VALLEY PAVING, INC.
12494 WYOMING AVE. SOUTH
SAVAGE, MN. 55378
BLACKTOP SERVICE CO.
1200 WEST HWY. 13
BURNSVILLE, MN. 55337
BID BOND
10%
lo%
10%
TOTAL AMOUNT
$35,118.75
$25,885.00
$32,436.00
$32,774.28
NO BID
$46,420.O0
$28,166.25
$32,659.75
$3o,751.oo
$31,924.50
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED COST - $32,000.00
lp
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS B LAND SURVEYORS M PLANNERS
June 22, 1982
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Subject:
City of Mound
1982 Street Overlay Project
File #6468
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
Nine bids were received on Friday, June 18, 1982 for
the above project. As you can see from the attached bid
tabulation, the City received some very good prices. Our
estimate for the three sections was approximately $32,000.
The low bid received was submitted by Aero Asphalt, Inc.,
in the amount of $25,885.50.
They are a newly formed company without any previous
projects to use as reference. We have meet with them,
reviewed the project, and recommend that the City enter
into a contract for this project.
I will be happy to answer any further questions the
Council may have on this project.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
JC :sj
Enc lo sure
Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria- Eagan
printed on recycled paper
:'ROJECT: 6468
2ITY OF MOUND
~ECTION I - PRIEST LANE
:NG MCCOMBS-KNUTSON
ITEM UNIT
1 1' BIT. LEVELING COURSE TON
2 BIT. TACK COAT #23S7 GAL
3 1-1/2' BlT WEAR COURSE TON
4 ADJUST MANHOLES EA
5 ADJUST GATE VALVES EA
1988
QUANTITY
STREET
ENC. ESTIMATE
UN I T TO TAL
180.0 0.00 0.00
110.0 0.00 0.00
200.0 0.00 0.00
3.0 0.00 0.00
3.0 0.00 0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
AERO ASPHALT, INC. WM. MUELLER & SONS
UNIT TQTAL UNIT TOTAL
82.80 8,736.00 84.75 8,970.00
1.2S 137.S0 1.00 110.00
83.00 4,600.00 84.75 4,9S0.00
13S.00 40S.00 175.00 S85.00
11S.00 34S.00 75.00 22S.00
TOTAL SECTION I - PRIEST LANE
0.00 8,883.S0 8,780.00
PROJECT: 6468
CITY OF HOUND
SECTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
ENGINEER: MCCOMBS-KNUTSOH
198~3
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
1 TACK COAT ~23S7 GAL 60.0
2 1-1/2" BIT. WEAR COURSE TON 180.0
3 ADJUST MANHOLES EA 8.0
4 ADJUST GATE VALVES EA 1.0
STREET OVERLAY PROJECT
ENG. ESTIMATE AERO ASPHALT, INC.
UN IT TOTAL UN IT TOTAL
PAGE 1
WM. MUELLER & SONS
UNIT TOTAL
0.00 0.00 1.2S 75.00 1.00 60.00
0.00 0.00 83.80 2,856.00 24.75 2,970.00
0.00 0.00 12~.00 270.00 175.00 3S0.00
0.00 0.00 llS.O0 115.00 75.00 75.00
TOTAL SECTION I! - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
0.00 3,316.00 3,455.00
PROJECT: 6468
CITY OF HOUND 1988
SECTION III - GUMWOOO ROAD & LANGDON LN
ENGINEER; MCCOMSS-KNUTSON
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
STREET
ENG. ESTIMATE
UNIT TOTAL
1 BIT. PATCH MN/DOT ~2331 TO?~ 210.0 0.00
2 BI1. TACK COAT ~2357 GAL 180.0 0.00
3 1-1/2" BlT. WEAR COURSE TOil 38S.0 0.00
4~UST MANHOLES EA S.0 0.00
S~UST GATE VALVES EA 2.0 0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
PAGE 1
AERO ASPHALT, INC. WM. MUELLER & SONS
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 85.90 5,4S9.00 84.7S 5,197.50
0.00 1.25 22S.00 1.00 1BO.O{:
0.00 80.80 7,777.00 84.75 9,588.75
0.00 12~.00 675.00 175.00 875.00
0.00 llS. O0 230.00 7S.00 1SO.O0
TOTAL SECTION II! - GUMW30D ROAD & LANGDON LN
TOTAL SECTIONS I, II, & III
0.00
14,346. O0
25,885.50
1S, 931.25
28,116.25
ROJECTr 6468
ITY OF MOUND 1982
iCTIDN I - PRIEST LANE
MCCOMBS-KNUTSON
ITEM UNIT QL~4NTITY
1 1" BIT. LEVELING COURSE TON 180.0
2 BIT. TACK COAT #23S7 GAL llO. O
3 i-i/~- BIT ~AR COU~S~ TON ~00.0
4 ADJUST MANHOLES EA 3.0
S ADJUST GATE VALVES Ed 3.0
ST REE T
ENG. ESTIMATE
UNIT TOTAL
OVERLAY PROJECT
VALLEY PAVING, INC.
UN I T TO TAL
0.00 0.00 88.00 8,640.00
0.00 0.00 1.60 176.00
0.00 0.00 23.50 4,700.00
0.00 0,00 180.00 360.00
O. OQ ~.00 IlO.OD ~0.00
BLACK TOP SERVICE CO
UNIT TOTAL
85.00 3,000.00
1.50 165.00
85.00 5,000.00
300.00 900.00
100.00 300.00
TOTAL SECTION I - PRIEST LANE
0.00 8,206.00 9,355.00
'ROJECT: 6468
:ITY OF MOUND 1988
~CTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
~GINEER: MCCOMBS-KNUTSO~
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
1 TACK COAT #23S7 GAL 60.0
2 1-i/2" BIT. WEAR COURSE TON 180.0
3 ADJUST MANHOLES EA 8.0
4 ADJUST GATE VALVES EA 1.0
STREET
ENG. -ESTIMATE
UN ! T TO TAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
VALLEY PAVING, INC.
UNIT TOTAL
2.00 1~0.00
24.00 2,880.00
1SO. O0 300.00
130.00 130.00
PAGE 8
BLACK TOP SERVICE CO
UNIT TOTAL
8.00 120.00
SS.SO 3,060.00
100.00 800.00
8S.00 8S.00
TOTAL SECTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
0.00 3,430.00
3,46S.00 ,
'ROJECT." 6468
:ITY OF MOUND 1982
~-CTION III - GUMWDOD ROAD & LANGDON LN
~G INEER: MCCOMBS-KNUTSON
ITEM
! BIT. PATCH MN/DOT
2 BIT. TACK COAT #23S7
3 1-1/2' BIT. WEAR COURSE
4 MANHOLES
S GATE VALVES
UNIT QUANTITY
STREET
ENG. ESTIMATE
UN I T TO TAL
TON 810.0 0.00
GAL 180.0 0.00
TON 38S.0 0.00
EA S.0 0.00
EA 8.0 0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
PAGE 2
VALLEY PAVING, INC. BLACK TOF' SERVICE CO
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 44.00 9,240.00 $~.70 8,2~7.00
0.00 1.SO 270.00 1.SO 270.00
0.00 23.00 8,855.00 85.50 9,817.50
0.00 110.00 SS0.00 100.00 S00.00
0.00 100.00 200.00 8S.00 170.00
TOTAL SECTION III - GL~MWOOD ROAD 8, LANGDON LN
TOTAL SECTIONS I, II & III
0.00
19, liS. O0
30,751.00
19,094.S0
31,924.50
:'ROJECT: 6468
.'ITY OF MO UNO
fCTION I - PRIEST LANE
MCCOMBS-KNUTSON
ITEM UNIT
1" BIT. LEVELING COURSE TON
BIT. TACK COAT #2357 GAL
i-i/2' BIT ~EAR COURSE TON
ADJUST MANHOLES EA
ADSUST GATE VALVES EA
TOTAL SECTION I - PRIEST LANE
1982
QUANTITY
STREET
ENG. ESTIMATE
UNIT TOTAL
120.0 0.00 0.00
110.0 O. O0 O. O0
200.0 0.00 0.00
3.0 0.00 0.00
3.0 0.00 0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
ASPHALT PAVING MATLS
UNIT TOTAL
27.80 3,5<36.00
1.10 1Pl. O0
25.80 5,iGO. O0
80.00 240.00
60.00 180.00
PAGE
NORTHWEST ASPHALT
UNIT TOTAL
~5.00 3,000.00
2.00 220.00
25.75 5,150.00
130.00 390.00
75.00 225.00
O. O0 9,037. O0 B, 90S. O0
>ROJECT: 6468
DITY OF MOUND
ICTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
iNGINEER: MCCOMBS-KNUTSON
1982
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
1 TACK COAT #23S7 GAL 60.0
2 1-1/8" BIT. WEAR COURSE TON 20.0
3 ADJUST MANHOLES EA 2.0
4 ADJUST GATE VALVES EA 1.0
STREET
ENG~ ESTIMATE
UNIT TOTAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
PAGE 3
ASPHALT PAVING MATLS NORTHWEST ASPHALT
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 1.10 66.00 3.00 1BO. O0
0.00 25.80 3,~.00 85,75 3,090.00
0.00 80.00 160.00 130.00 860.00
0.00 60.00 60.00 75.00 75.00
TOTAL SECTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
0.00 3,388.00 3,605.00
F'ROJECT: 6468
CITY OF MOUND 1988
SECTION III - GUHWODD ROAD ~ LANGDON LN
ENGINEER: MCCOMBS-KNUTSON
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
STREET
ENG. ESTIMATE
UNIT TOTAL
BIT. PATCH MN/DOT #25~:1 TON 210.0 0.00
BIT. TACK COAT #23S7 GAL 1BO.O 0.00
1_1/2~ BIT. WEAR COURSE TON 385.0 0.00
~m~UST MANHOLES EA S. 0 O. 00
I~UST GATE VALVES EA 8.0 0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
PAGE 3
ASPHALT PAVING MATLS NORTHWEST ASPHALT
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 44.60 9,366.00 48.00 B,B20.O0
0.00 1.10 198.00 1.50 270.00
0.00 25.80 9,9°~:.00 85.$x3 9,759.75
0.00 BO. O0 400.00 130.00 650.00
0.00 60.00 120.00 ?S.O0 150.00
IOTAL SECTION III - GL~IWOOD ROAD & LANGDON LN
TOTAL SECTIONS I, II, & III
O. O0 80,017. O0 19,649.75
32,436.00 32,239.75
F'ROJECT ~ 6468
CIT¥ OF HOUND
SECTION I - PRIEST LANE
MCCOMBS-KNUTS~N
ITEM UNIT
1 1' BIT. LEVELING COURSE TON
8 BIT. TACK COAT #25~7 GAL
3 1-1/8' BIT WEAR COURSE TON
4 ADJUST MANHOLES EA
S ADJUST GATE VALVES EA
19B~!
QUANTITY
ST REE T
ENG. ESTIMATE
UNIT TOTAL
180.0 O. OO
110.0 0.00
800.0 0.00
3.0 0.00
3.0 O. O0
OVERLAY PROJECT
PAGE
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS ALEXANDER CONSTR.
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 24.50 8,940.00 88.50 3,480.00
0.00 0.10 11.00 1.85 137.S0
0.00 24.85 4,970.00 89.80 5,840.00
0.00 160.00 480.00 150.00 450.00
0.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 300.00
TOTAL SECTION I - PRIEST LANE
0.00 B,701.O0 10,147.50
PROJECT: 6468
CITY OF MOUND
S~CTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
ENGINEER: MCCOMBS-KNUTSOi~
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
1982 STREET
ENG. ESTIMA~
UNIT TOTAL
TACK COAT ~2357 GAL 60.0 0.00
1-1/8' BIT. WEAR COURSE TON ]80.0 0.00
ADJUST MAHdDLES EA 8.0 0.00
ADJUST GATE VALVES EA 1.0 0.00
OVERLAY F'ROJECT
PAGE 4
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS ALEXANDER CONSTR.
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 0.10 6.00 1.85 75.00
0.00 84.85 8,988.00 31.80 3,744.00
0.00 160.00 380.00 150.00 300.00
0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
TOTAL SECTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
0.00 3,408.00 4,819.00
PROJECT: 6468
CITY OF MOUND 1982 STREET
SECTIO~ III - GL~WOOD ROAD ~ LAI~GDOt~ L?~
ENGINEER: MCCOMBS-KNUTSON
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
ENG. ESTIMATE
UNI~ TOTAL
1 BIT. PATCH MN/DOT #2331 TO!~ 210.0 0.00
2 8IT. TACK COAT #P357 GAL 180.0 0.00
3 1-1/8" BIT. WEAR COURSE TO!~ 385.0 0.00
4~UST MANHOLES EA S.O 0.00
S~J~JUST GATE VALVES EA 8.0 0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
PAGE 4
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS ALEXANDER CONSTR.
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 48.00 10,080.00 44.00 9,840.00
0.00 0.10 18.00 1.85 885.00
0.00 84.~ 9,567.85 86.85 10,337.85
0.00 160.00 800.00 150.00 750.00
0.00 100.00 800.00 100.00 800.00
TOTAL SECTION I!I - GUMWOOD ROAD & LANGDON LN
TOTAL SECTIONS I, II, & III
0.00
80,665.85
32,774.25
20,752.85
35,118.75
PROJECT~' 6468
CITY OF MOUND
SECTION I - F'RIEST LANE
~m~NEER: MCCOMBS-)OIUTSON
1988
ITEM UNI? QUANTITY
1' BIT. LEVELING COURSE TO~ 180.0
BIT. TACK COAT #2~7 GAL 110.0
I-i/P" BIT WEAR COURSE TON 200.0
ADJUST MANHOLES EA 3.0
ADJUST GATE VALVES EA 3.0
TOTAL SECTION I - PRIEST LANE
STREET
ENG. ESTIMATE
UNIT TOTAL
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
OVERLAY PROJECT
MIDWEST ASPHALT
UN I T TO TAL
36.50 4,380.00
8.10 831. O0
37.00 7,400.00
80.00 840.00
70. O0 810. O0
0.00 18,461.00
PROJECT: G468
CITY OF MOUND
~CTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
ENGINEER: MCCOMBS-ENUISON
1982
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
lACE COAT ~8357 GAL 60.0
1-1/8" BIT. WEAR COURSE 1ON 180.0
ADJUST MANHOLES EA 8.0
ADJUST GATE VALVES EA 1.0
STREET OVERLAY PROJECT
ENG. ESTIMATE MID,ST ASPHALT
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 0.00 8.10 186.00
0.00 0.00 37.00 4,440.00
0.00 0.00 80.00 160.00
0.00 0.00 70,00 70.00
PAGE 5
TOTAL SECTION II - RUSTIC RIDGE ROAD
0.00 4,796.00
PROJECT: G4G8
CITY OF MOUND 1982
SECTION III - GUMW00D ROAD & LANGDON LN
ENGINEER: MCCOMBS-KNUTSON
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
1 BIT. PATCH MN/DDT #8C4:1
8 BIT. lACK COAT #23S7
3 1-1/2" BIT. WEAR COURSE
,ADJUST MANHOLES
ADJUST GATE VALVES
TON 810.0
GAL 180.0
TON 38S.0
EA S.0
EA 8.0
STREET
OVERLAY PROJECT
ENG. ESTIMATE MIDWEST ASPHALT
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
0.00 0.00 70.00 14,700.00
0.00 0.00 8.10 378.00
0.00 0.00 37.00 14,84S.00
0.00 0.00 80.00 400.00
0.00 0.00 70.00 140.00
PAGE S
TOTAL SECIION III - G~WDOD ROAD & LANGDON LN
TOTAL SECTIONS I, II, & III
0.00
89,863.00
47,120.00
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I~ LAND SURVEYORS ~ PLANNERS
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
June 22, 1982
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Subject:
City of Mound
1980 Street Improvements
Completion of Waterbury Road
File #5248
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
We have received bids from three different contractors
for the completion of Waterbury Road. This is the section
of street that went through condemnation proceedings to ac-
quire the necessary easement. Valley Paving submitted the
low bid of $5,067.00. Attached are copies of the three bids
received.
We would recommend that the City sign a contract with
Valley Paving to complete this section of street.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Joh~nCamer~o~n~~yx~'''-~
JC:sj
Enclosure
Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria - Eagan
printed on rec¥cted paper
PROPOSAL
Completion of Street Improvement on
Waterbury Road East of Tuxedo Boulevard
City of Mound
File #5248
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT. PRICE TOTAL
Fill Material
(City will furnish)
i50 c.Y. $ 5.¢o /cY $ ~o°~
Remove Existing
Bituminous 170 S.Y. $
Concrete Curb &
Gutter 5-512
Concrete Driveway Apron
150 L.F.
75 S.F.
$- I~.~ /LF
$_ _S..°Z°./SF
$ ·/-~0o ~
$..
Bituminous Wear
Mn/DOT 2341
Black Dirt & Sod
65 TON $ 2/~ O'O /TN $
25 S.Y. $. 6,¢ /SY $.
Black Dirt & Seed 250 S.Y. $ .~.crC~ /SY $ ~C~-°°
Adjust M.H. Casting 1 EACH $ o~o-~)_~./EA $.. ~-~.0~2 .. c¢~
TOTAL BID ...................................................... $ ,~q~) %. O0
PROPOSAL
Completion of Street Improvement on
Waterbury Road East of luxedo Boulevard
City of Mound
File #5248
ITEM
Fill Material
(City will furnish)
Remove Existing
Bituminous
Concrete Curb &
Gutter S-512
Concrete Driveway Apron
Bituminous Wear
Mn/DOT 2341
Black Dirt & Sod
Black Dirt & Seed
Adjust M.H. Casting
QUANTITY UNIIRRICE TOIAL
150 C.Y. $ ~.o~./CY
150 L.F.
75 S.F.
$ /d5"~,~90 /LF
$-~o~2 /SF
65 TON $ ~'~(),OC') /TN $' .~'~/
25 S.Y. $ ,5'~",oo /SY $- -
250 S.Y. $ ~,~c> /SY $
1 EACH $ /~,~/EA $....
TOTAL BID ...................................................... $ ~,/~m.~5~/~(~
Anthony Bianconi '
Widmer Bros., Inc.
P.O. Box 218
Spring Park, MN 55384
RROROSAL
Completion of Street Improvement on
Waterbury Road East of Tuxedo Boulevard
City of Mound
File #5248
ITEM
Fill Material
(City will furnish)
Remove Existing
Bituminous
Concrete Curb &
Gutter S-512
Concrete Drlveway Apron
Bituminous Wear
Mn/DOT 2341
81ack Dirt & Sod ~ ~;~
81ack Dirt & Seed ~z/~4~
Adjust M.H. Casting
QUANTITY UNIT F~ICE TOZAL
TOTAL BID ......................................................
76"
June 16, 1982
CITY of
MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
RE: UNIT CHARGE CASES
Enclosed are two cases where people have applied to combine lots for the
purpose of reducing their street assessments. Since both are conforming
lots, I would think we would not want to approve them, but I bring them
forward for the Council's edification and my clarification.
JE: fc
CITY of
MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(6t2) 472-1155
Date:
To:
From:
Regarding:
June 9, 1982
Jon Elam
Sharon Legg
Dropping of a unit charge on PID# 24-117-24 43 0072
I reviewed the circumstances of the combination of Lots 4 & 33 and
5 & 32, Block 15, Arden Addition. A request to combine these lots
was signed on October 6, 1981. At that time, there was a house on
each property. Therefore, a unit charge could not be cancelled per
John Cameron. Each lot was 8,000 square feet in an area zoned
A-2 (6,000 Sq. Ft.) and thus a conforming lot.
When I talked to Mrs. Vance, I did not know there was a house on each
parcel. She seemed to think a unit charge was to be dropped when she
combined these lots. I agreed but told her I needed to check further.
She made no mention about two buildings or tearing down one. I told'
her to hold off on paying her taxes, that we would check it out.
This is where it stands. She is still under the impression that
a unit charge will be dropped because of the combination and I
am guessing she is still waiting to pay her taxes. If you decide you
would like to drop a unit charge after she demolishes her home, a
resolution is attached.
/2??
.,~.
· 8534
~ IR.L.S. N
BRIGHTON'
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 9, 1982
Jon Elam
Sharon Legg
Dropping of a unit charge on PID 13-117-24 44 0090 (new PID)
A request four combination was signed on ~overmb.e~_El3, 1981 by
Mrs. Rose Braun to combine PID 13-117-24 44 0082 and 13-117-24 44 0083.
Pe-~-~--~i-~-~b'~'si6n she had with Gloria Alstrup at the county, she received
a tax statement with the combination on it. However, there was no
reduction in the amount of specials which ~the thought there wouTd be.
Gloria told her not to pay her taxes until she received a revised tax
statement. These parcels consist of Lots 51 and 52, Subdivision of
Lots 1 and 32, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood. Lot 51 t*
~ 16,000 sq.ft.
and Lot 52 was 8,200 square feet, zoned B (Duplex 6,000/unit).
What she was told at the time of combination, I don't know. However',
she did come in past the deadline and it looks as if her lots were con-
forming tO begin with.
/
f
B
'~. 59 5B 57 . 36 i'~5 .34 . 5~
~ NORTHER~ ~o
ROAD
· < ',$¢"12 ';$
June 16, 1982
CITY of
MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
Enclosed is a memo and a map from the School's Engineer on the Drop-Off
Project near the Ice Arena. As you will note, the final project cost
will be somewhat less than the $17,654.51 we approved last Fall (i.e.
$16,964.03).
The Council does need to approve a Change Order (item 4) in the amount
of $900.00 to cover wood chips, mat and plastic edging.
Soon, hopefully, the project will be completed, which along with the
Ice Arena's landscaping will really make an esthetic improvement downtown.
JE:fc
/So/
HGA
MEMO TO:
MEMO BY:
DATED:
SUBJECT:
Mound Bus Drop - Commission Number 435.048
James Husnik
14 June 1982
Field inspection and meeting
A site meetin9 was held Thursday, June 10, 1982. Present were: Ron Chester
(C. S. McCrossan), H. B. R. Larson (Independent School District #277), Jon Elam
(City of Mound), Jerry Coles (Manager, Sports Center project) and myself.
The contract work is incomplete. In 1981, the contractor completed $14,811.58
worth of work leaving a maximum of $2,842.93 for completion of the job this year.
The incomplete work is as follows:
1. Two Alpine Currants have to be added to the north end of the island. This
will be done under the $720.00 figure submitted and paid last fall.
2. Approximately 130 cubic yards of fill are required to complete grading. This
includes a minimum of 6" of topsoil for subsequent laying of sod.
3. The entire area disturbed by grading shall be sodded. This will result in
approximately 535 sq. yds. of sod.
At this meeting it was noted that a requested change for wood chips around a
significant tree was not covered by the contract. The contractor was asked to
provide a lump sum quote for wood chips plastic edging and a plastic mat as
shown on drawing C1R revised 6/14/82.
Be
On Monday, June 14, 1982, Ron Chester of C. S. McCrossan quoted a figure of
$900.00 to complete the wood chips, plastic mat and plastic edging as shown on
drawing ClR (revised 6/14/82).
The projected costs for completion of the project are as follows:
Unit Price
Item 1 (No Charge)
Item 2 130 cubic yards at
$4.49 = $ 683.70
Item 3 535 square yards of sod at $1.25 = $ 668.75
Item 4 lump sum quote for wood
chips, mat and plastic edging
$ 900.00
$2,152.45
it appears as though the project will be completed for less than the contract
amount of $17,654.51. Payment will be made by the City of Mound for the actual
yardages placed multiplied by the unit prices agreed to in the contract. The
total amount shall not exceed the contract amount.
la
cc:
Donald Brandenburg
H. B. R. Larson
Ron Chester
~on Elam
June 16, 1982
CITY of
MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
Enclosed are the specifications for Well No. 8.
George Boyer will be on hand to review them and answer any questions.
will then be in a position to seek bids and continue forward with our
efforts to put a well in Island Park.
We
JE:fc
545 Indian Mound
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
(612) 473-4224
March 15, 1982
Mr. Jon Elam
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota
55364
Re: Test Holes
Dear Jon:
Enclosed herewith please fi nd one copy of the following:
Test hole logs
E-logs of test holes
We are in the process of analyzing the logs and E-logs along with
the test hole samples taken during the drilling operations and
will be submitting our analysis and recommendations shortly.
Sincerely,
EU~E A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
Vice President
bt
Enclosures
TEST HOLE NO. 1
(Donald Drive and Devon
MOUND, MINNESOTA
Lane)
0-1
1-25
25-27
27-36
36-50
50-73
73-76
76-200
200-212
DescriEtion
Black dirt
Yellow clay
Rock
Yellow clay
Blue clay
Sand
Red clay
Fine red sand
Yellow fine sandstone
(Park
TEST HOLE NO. 2
at Maintenance Building)
MOUND, MINNESOTA
0-1
1 -60
60-63
63-72
72-127
1 27-140
Black dirt
Blue clay
Rocks and boulders
Dirty sand
Clean sand
Yellow sandstone
60
?0
80
85
90
100
105
110
115
1~0
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
TEST
S?
-8
-1:2
-8
+11
+8
-8
+2
-8
0
0
+8
-8
0
+11
+8
+5
+5
+11
+7
+7
-:2
0
+4
+4
+2
0
0
0
+8
E-LOG
HOLE NO.
0,2
290
352
394
145
160
236
142
424
545
535
463
668
485
109
105
102
101
96
116
149
2O7
196
205
160
152
196
143
136
186
2.5
83
160
152
36
33
55
45
163
292
279
213
308
330
20
14
13
13
13
18
25
46
46
52
38
32
34
28
21
28
E- LOG
TEST HOLE NO. 2
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
'/5
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
+14 34
+5 48
+12 4'/
+7
0 58
+2 57
+8 40
+2 40
+10 53
+8 52
+4 67
-16 105
-1 5 136
-2 114
+8 112
+4 134
-3 137
0 118
-8 130
-8 122
-8 113
-4 102
0 114
-10 131
-14 224
5
0
2
5
5
4
1
0
0
4
4
15
25
23
18
27
28
34
27
23
22
20
20
26
42
CITY OF I','IOUND
MOUND, Iv~iNN~SOTA
SPECI ~ICAf~ION~ ~OH
WELL NO. 5
EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASUOCIATE~
JUNE 1952
NOTICE OF bE'£'L'L~'~
WEbL flU. 5
I~M)UND, ~IIN[~EtSOTA
Sealed bids will be received in triplicate, at the of£ice of
the City ~vla'nager City oz' ~'lound, ~'linnesota until o'cloc~ p.m.
on the day of 1952 and opened and read aloud. Said
bids will be considered at. o'clock p.m. on the day of
1952, for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, and
equipment required to construct a new well, all as outlined and in
strict accordance with the plans and specifications as prepared by
E. A. Hickok and Associates, Inc., Hydrologists Engineers, 545
Indian ~ound, Wayzata, [~'linnesota 55391. Plans and Upecifications
are on file with the City Manager, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound,
Minnesota and E. A. Hickok and Associates, Inc.
All proposals shall be made on forms to be supplied by the
Engineer like those attached to, and made a part of, the Contract
Documents and shall be addressed to:
~v[r. Jon Elam, City Manager
5341 Maywood Road
~ound, Minnesota 55364
and endorsed:
Bid for~ Well No. 5
Copies of the plans and specifications may be obtained'from
the Engineer on deposit of the sum of $25.00 Dollars.
Each proposal shall be accompanied by a certified check, bid
bond or cash deposit made payable to the City of Mound,'Minnesota
in the amount of ten percent (10~) of the maximum bid, as a
guarantee that the Bidder will enter into the proposed contract
within the time specified.
The successful bidder shall furnish a performance bond within
ten (10) days after award of the contract in the full amount of
the contract. The performance bond shall be executed by a company
duly authorized to do business in the 5tare of Minnesota.
The bidder shall furnish a statement satisfactory to the
Owner and Engineer that he is a qualified bidder, that he
maintains a permanent place of business and that he has had
experience in constructing and performing the wor~ as outlined in
this Specification.
The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive
minor irregularities if it appears to said Owner that such
irregularities and errors were made through inadvertance.
NL-1
No bidder may withdraw ~i:~ bid for at ±ea:Jt t~irty (jOj days
after ~ct~eduled closi~g time for t~e receipt of t~e bids.
Publ~s~ed by autt~ortty oI' the City of i,iou~d, l~if~ne,~ota.
City of i~lound, l~innesota
By Jon Elam
~City L~ianager)
.By
-~Uity Clerk]
1.01 HCOPE OP WOtiK
The Contractor shall provide al.L 'Labor, material.La, sKil'L and
equipment to satisfactorily construct one new sanitary municipal
well in the City of i~lound, ~v~inne:sota; all in strict accordance
with the Specit'ications. The new well shall be constructed in the
form of a 20' x 12' deep well, and shall10e constructed by either
cable tool or rotary, equipment.
Only the best established practice of workmanship snell be used
throughout the course of t~]is work and the final water supply
shall comply in all respects to the various sanitary and
construction standards as set forth by the lVlinnesota ~tate
Department of Health.
The total depth of the deep well covered in these Specifications
will be approximately 200 feet from existing grade.
All drilling operations throughout 'the course of this work shall
be considered as a progressive program of testing and exploration
of the underground conditions. The well shall 'be finished at the
elevation and in the manner whic~ is found to be most suitable for
producing the maximum yield.
In the event that a satisfactory quantity and quality of water is
found or located at a depth of less than 200 feet, the Contractor
may be required to finish and develop the well at this elevation;
however, he may be requested to continue his drilling operatibns
to a greater depth or to pull back to some previous elevation
nearer to the surface.
The necessary approval with regard to location and construction
details will be secured from the Minnesota State Department of
Health by the Owner before the Contractor commences his
operations. Representatives from 'the State Department of Health,
as well as various municipal officials and personnel, snail have
access to the construction site at all times throughout the course
of this work.
1.02 .CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS
The Contractor shall at all times keep his operations confined to
the construction site and to maintain the noise of drilling work
to a minimum. No drilling operations will be permitted at night
unless approval is granted by the Owner.
1.03 REMOVAL OF CONBTRUCTION DEBHI~
During the progress of the work, all rubbish and unused materials
shall be removed from the site and disposed ct' in a location as
directed by the Owner. Drilling debris shall only be allowed to
accumulate where directed, and under no circumstances snail this
/$11
the work covered in ti~e~tx ,~pu~.~['ica¢ions, the construction site
shall be restored to its uri6ia::~l tteat and orderky condition.
1 .04 LOG OF DH[I~,ING OF~i~TIO~S
The Contractor shal£ at ali times keep an accurate log of the
location of tops and bottoms of ali the various geological
formation encountered during his dril£ing operations. ~hese
records shall contain a complete and accurate description of the
various water levels encountered. ,~amples shall be taken wherever
the character of the geological formation changes, and never at
more than 2-foot intervals from top to bottom of well. Ail
samples shall be submitted to the Owner in glass oars of not less
than one pint capacity, together with one copy of the complete
drilling log of the well before final payment is made. Copies of
the I'inal drilling log of the well snail also be submitted to the
Engineer upon completion of the wor~.
1.O5 WATER SAMPLES
The Owner shall at all times throughout the course of this wor~
have the liberty of taking water samples from the well during the
drilling operations. The Contractor shall furnish whatever
assistance necessary in order to secure satisfactory samples. The
Contractor shall be required to suspend drilling operations as
directed for such a time as reasonable in order that various
analyses can be made of the water samples. The Engineer shall be
notified whenever a change in water level occurs or whenever a
distinctive change in formation is encountered so that he may have
ample opportunity to take such samples in order to determine the
various changes in the quality and quantity of the water.
1 .06 CASINGS
Casings to be used as a part o£ the permanent well shall be of new
material. The casing to be used in connection with t~is wor~
shall consist of straight new black steel pipe provided with
beveled ends suitable for continuous welding. The minimum wall
thickness shall be as follows:
Size Diameter (in) ThicKness Weight Per Foot
(in) External Internal (in) (lbs)
8 8.625 7.981 O .322 28.55
~O ~O.750 10.020 0.365 40.48
12 12.750 12.7OO 0.375 49.56
14 14.0OO 13.250 0.375 54.57
1~ 16 .OOO 15 .250 O .375 62.5~
1U 18 .OOO 17.250 O .375 70.59
20 20.0OO 19.250 0.375 7~.60
24 24 .OOO 23 .OOO O .500 125 .49
T~-2
All steel casing used in co~nection wit~ t~i:~ wor~ s~all 5e of a
type us l,anuf:~ctured Oy ~ repu'table pip~ ma~nfacturer ~nd shall De
delivered to t~e construction site free from Ourrs, abrasions,
deflects or any other oboectionabie items. Welded-type casi.ng
joints shall Oe used. The welding ~al£ be done only by a
certiffied welder and the joint shall be of ~ single V-butt type
which is continuously welded around the entire circum£erence prior
to installation. The drive pipe section of the casing whic~ is
used shall be equipped with a standard forged steel drive shoe off
a size to meet the diameter conditions off the well.
The well casing shal'l extend above grade and ~e cut off at' the
elevation as designated by the Engineer. Pay quantity for the
well casing s~all be measured from grade to 'the deepest depth
reached during drilling and from grade to the top of the pipe.
Casing used flor the test well does not need to be off new material.
1.07 TEST WELL CONSTRUCTION
The Contractor shall drill a nominal 8-inch diameter hole to the
terminal depth off the well (200 fleet), keeping the drilled hole
ffull off a mixture o£ drilling Hud and water. The speciffic gravity
off the drilling Hud shall be adjusted to prevent collapse off the
wells off the test well. An 8-inch diameter casing, along with 25
£eet off test screen, shall 'be installed within the nominal 8-inch
drilling hole. The test well shall be developed £or £our hours
using high pressure jetting equipment. Upon completion o£ the
development, a test pump shall be installed and a pumping test
performed. Details on the test pump and pumping test are
specified elsewhere. '
1.08 TEST WELL PUMPING TEST
A£ter completion oZ~ the test well, t~e Contractor shall install a
standard engine-driven turbine or submersible pump capable of
delivering not less than 400 gallons per minute. Ail labor and
equipment required during the process off such test shall be
furnished by the Contractor. The testing equipment shall include
a drawdown gage and a calibrated ori£ice of su±'I'icient size to
determine the correct rate of pumping. The duration oI' the
pumping test shall be six continuous hours as a minimum and 24
continuous hours as a maximum. For 'bidding purposes, the duration
shall be 12 hours.
The Engineer shall be noti£ied o£ the scheduled pumping test as
far in advance as possible and must be present at the start off the
test.
Upon completion off the pumping test, the Contractor shall
dismantle the test pump and associated discharge piping, and pull
the 8-inch casing and screen. Ail materials removed shall be the
property of the Contractor.
TS-3
1.0~d WELL COlgaTe, OCT iOl~l
1£ the Owner awards the contract on the basis of cable tool
construction, the Contractor shall proceed to drive 24-inc~ casing
pipe i'rom 6rude to a ~epth of 50 feet, b;xiiin6 out material insime
the casing above the drive shoe. Upon completion bi' driving
24-inch casing, a 2b-inch casing shall be installed I'rom grade to
the 50-I'oot depth and then driven from the 5b-foot depth to a
depth of 1OO feet. A 12-inch O.D. casing shall be installed from
grade to the lOO-I'oot Ueptn and then ariven to a meptn of 200 feet.
A nominal 12-inch telescoping screen shall be placed inside the
12-inch casing and the screen exposed to the water-bearing
formation by jacking bac~ the 12-inch casing. A lead packer,
attached to the top of the screen, shall be swedged out to provide
a seal between the top of the screen and the 12-inch casing.
The 24-inch casing shall be removed and the annular space between
the 2b-inch and 12-inch casings shall be grouted in place. The
well shall be developed and a pumping test per£ormed as speci£ied
elsewhere. A cap shall be provided upon completion o£ the test
pumping.
If the Owner awards the contract on the basis o£ rotary drilling
construction, the Contractor shall proceed to drill a no~inal
20-rich open hole £rom grade to a depth of 200 feet. The 12-inch
casings shall be grouted in place. The well shall be developed
and a pumping test per£ormed as specified elsewhere. A cap shall
be provided upon completion o~ the test pumping.
If the Owner awards the contract on the basis of rotary drifling
construction, the Contractor shall proceed to drill a nominal
2b-inch open hole from grade to a depth of 200 feet. A 12-inch
screen and casing pipe shall be installed inside the 2b-inch open
hole using centering guides to insure that the 12-inch casing and
screen is centered inside the 2b-inch open hole.
A quantity of gravel shall be piped to the bottom of the well and
continued until the level of gravel is 15 feet above the top of
the screen. The remaining annular space between the 12-inch
casing and nominal 20-inch open hole shall be grouted from the top
of the gravel to the surface.
Upon completion of the grouting, the Contractor shall develop the
well and perform a pumping test as outlined elsewhere.
1 .10 PLUMBNESS AND ALIGNMENT
Plumbness and alignment shall be tested by lowering into the well
to a depth corresponding to the top o£ the screen, a section of
pipe 40 feet long or a dummy of the same length. The outer diameter
of the plumb shall not be more than 1/2-inch smaller than the
diameter of that part of the casing being tested. If a dummy is
used, it shall consist of rigid spindle with three rings, each being
12 inches wide. The rings shall be truly cylindrical and shall be
spaced one on each end of the dummy and one ring in the center.
TD-4
5t~ouLd the dummy or casing fail to move t'r~ely t~roug~oat the
length of the-casing or should the well vary .from the vertical in
excess of two-thirds the smallest insid~ diameter oI' that part'of
the well being tested per 1OO feet of depth, the plumbness ~nd
alignment of the well shall De corrected Oy the Contractor at
own expense. ~hould the Contractor fail to correct such faulty
alignment or plumbness, the Engineer may refuse to accept the
well. The E.ngineer may waive the requirements of this paragraph
if in his judgment: (a) the Contractor has exercised all possible
care in construction the well and the defect is due to
circumstances beyond, his control; (b) the utility of the completed
well will not be materially affected.
1.11 WELL DEVELOPED
The Contractor shall furnish all necessary pumps, compressors,
plungers, bailers or other needed equipment, and shall develop the
well by such approved methods as shall be necessary to give the
maximum yield of water per foot of drawdown and extract from the
water-bearing formation the maximum practical quantity of sand as
may, during the life of the well, 'be drawn through the screen when
the well is pumped under maximum conditions of drawdown. The
well, upon completion of development, shall be substantially free
from sand and until the turbidity is less than 5 mg/1.
1.12 TEST PUMPING
After completion of the well, the Contractor shall, furnish and
install a standard engine-driven deep well turbine-type test pump,
capable of delivering not less than 750 gallons per minute. All
labor and equipment required during the process of such tests
shall be furnished by the Contractor. The testing equipment shall
include a drawdown gage and a calibrated orifice of sufficient
size to determine the correct rate of pumping.
When a screen has been set in its final position, the well shall
be properly developed 'by pumping and surging with plunger and
jetting with water until definite indications snow that none of
the surrounding sand will enter and clog the screen, if the well
were being pumped at a rate causing not less than a 50 percent
drawdown. After the well has been fully developed, the screen
shall be cleaned and a final test made with a duration of test of
not less than twelve (12) hours of continuous pumping of sand-free
water. This test shall decide the rate of flow, maximum drawdown,
and the probable per~nanency of yield. All tests shall be
conducted while the pumping equipment is being operated at
capacity unless otherwise directed, and snail continue for any
length of time as ordered. The Engineer shall be Kept informed of
all preliminary tests and under no conditions shall a final test
of the well be made until the Contractor has received proper
notification from the Engineer. Upon completion of the final
test, the Contractor shall dismantle the test pump and connections
and the well shall be properly capped, ready for the installation
of the permanent pump at a later date.
TS-b
The cost off the £'[nal test on the well s~tal[ be included in the
item bid. '['rte cost o£' ali additional tests ma~ie s[~all be paid for
by the Owne£ at the same rate as stated in the Contractor's
proposal.
1 · 15 DISI~FECTi¢)N
At the completion of the work, and beI'or~ Z'inal acceptance by the
Owner and .Engineer, the new well shall be entire±y sterilized in
accordance with the procedure recommended by the ~innesota State
Department of Health.
1.14 WELL SCREEN
The Contractor shall furnish and install a nominal 12-inch well
screen. The screen shall be entirely fabricated of Everdur metal
and be of the type as manufactured by the Johnson Well Screen
Company, or approved equal. The design o£ the screen to be used
in this work shall produce the maximum area, together wit~ the
necessary slot sizes and fittings whi~:.,have been predetermined
after the Contractor has submitted to the Engineer a 10 pound
sample o£ the material which has been taken from eac five fleet o£
depth o£ the water-bearing formation.
The slot openings for the screen shall be determined by 6he
Engineer, based on the manufacturer's recommendations. Length o£
screen shall be determined by the Engineer, and shall be furnished
and installed complete with the necessary attachments and fittings
by this Contractor. Payment shall be 'based only upon the actual
amount of screen which has been installed. T~e screen shall.be
installed in the best manner off workmanship.
The screen shall be accurately centered in the hole by means off
guide rings attached to the screen. The Contractor, in his
proposal, shall state the cost of £urnisaing and installing a
nominal 12-inch diameter screen.
TB-b
CrTY OF HOUHD, MINNESOTA E.A. H~KOK & A~IATES Feb. 1982
HY~OL~ISTS '
LOC~_T i ON ~aP ~INNE APHIS - ~IN~TA 1
,,10~~~~~~ ~1~ - : .....
o, ....
,,,.,, .... "'
~ ~ ~~F
,,,, ~I .,,,.,.~ ~1~ ~I .,, ~ .... ,.,.~.. ~.....
'- "- I' ~-'
,,, ~ , .... 0.011 ~[ ~, .... ~~
- ~L .0., J~ .~ '~ ..,., ~L-~:~~~~-'~''''
~ .o. .,~
..... ....
c'"'"y,, o~. r~ou,.r ,' .... ...... , ,~,,,,'~'o~'~ E.A. H~KOK & A~IATES ~eb. ,' 982
HY~~ISTS - ~ERS
~,c:,~>:'] o~ ~:~P MI~EAP~iS.MiN~TA
Mound City Council
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
June 1, 1982
Gentlemen:
Reference is made to Resolution #81-205 which
authorized extention of the time limit requiring that
the final plat for Pelican Point be filed by June 26,
1982.
While development of this property remains our
earnest desire the economic conditions of high interest
rates, shortage of available money and severe downturn
in the economic climate which have drastically affected
the housing industry have made it impossible to proceed
with this development at the present time.
Therefore, an extension of at least 365 days to the
time limit placed on Resolution #81-205 dated June 9,
1981 for our Pelican Point project is hereby requested.
Ver~ truly yours,
~alp~r~. Turnq~ist /j~
322G W. Calhoun ParkWay
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
2820 TUXEDO BOULEVARD · MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 · TELEPHONE 473-9693
226
June 9, 1981
Councilmember Swenson moved the .following resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 817205
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXTENSION OF THE TIME LIMIT
OF ~ESOLUTION 80-238 TO JUNE 26, 1982
WHEREAS, R~solution 79-251 required the final'plat for Pelican Point be
filed within 365 days, and
WHEREAS, the final p'lat was not filed within 365 days of the adoptio'n
date of the Resolution 79-251 as specified or approva! would
be null and void, and
WHEREAS, Resolution 79-251'was amended by Resolution 80-238 requiring
the final plat for Pelican Point to be filed within 730 days
after the adoption of Resolution 79-251 dated 6-26-79, and
WHEREAS, the final plat was not filed within 730 days of the adoption
date of the Resolution 79-251 as specified or approval would
be null and void as specified in Resolution 80-238.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF MOUND,
MOUND, MINNESOTA: ;
That Council doe~ hereby extend the~time iimit of Resoiuti6n
80-238 by requiring that the final plat for Pelican Point be
filed by June 26, 1982.
A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
'Co6~cilmember Polston and upon vote being taken thereon; the following voted
in favor thereof; Charon, Polston, Swenson and Lind~an, the following voted
against the same; none, with Ulrick being absent, whereupon said resolution
was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature
attested by the City Clerk.
ty Clerk CMC
MINUTES OF THE JUNE 10, 1982
MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Present: Co-Chair Cathy Bailey and Cheryl Burns; Commissioners Delores Maas,
· Andy Gearhart., Lowell Swenson and Toni Case; Park Director Chris Bollis and
Secretary Marge Stutsman. Council Representative Pinky Charon and Commissioner
Phyllis Jessen were absent and excused.
Chair Cathy Bailey opened the meeting.
Steps down to Commons frOm"Canary Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Dybing, Mr. & Mrs. Tod Holmberg, Mi'tchell Erickson, Mark Richard-
son, Tim and Nora Harrell and Leo Bullock:were present regarding steps down to the
Commons'from Canary Lane on Harrison Bay.;
The Park Director explained that he has had a request from ~he area residents for
a stairway to Wiota Commons from Canary Lane. The present stairway on the Commons
in front of Dybing's residence.was erected by a former resident and now is in
hazardous condition. The bank is steep and there is erosion of the soil.
The residents present asked the City to install the stairway; no way to get down
to lake except.sliding or going through someone's yard; clay sol!--gets very slip-
pery. Discussed. Park Director thought perhaps there might be some funds in the
capital outlay fund. The residents present agreed to remove the preseRt stairway
if the City put in a new stairway."
Gearhart moved and Maas seconded a. motion to recommend that the City of Mound
construct a'.new'stalrway'at the end of south.Canary Lane for the obvious reason
of safety and for the use of the.neighborhood residen~ that have the right to
use the dedicated Commons; based on the final approval of the City Council and.
on the recommendation of the City Manager. Major reason for the motion is that
there Ps no other stairway access on Wiota Commons within 4 blocks. The vote
on the motion was unanimously In favor.
Note: Residents asked to be notified of the Council meeting when this will be heard.
BILLS ..... JUNE 22,']982
Arcon Construction
Applebaums
Assn of Metrop Munic
Acro Minnesota
Badger Meter
Ben Franklin
Blackowiak & Son
F.H. Bathke
Janet Bert rand
Holly Bost rom
Robert Cheney
Bill Clark Standard
Coast to Coast
Continental Tele
Fran Clark
Carver County News
Chapin Publishing
Cy's Mens Wear
Donnies on the Lake
Davies Water Equip
Dictaphone
Ecklund Refrigeration
Educational Aids
Jon Elam
Nick Gronberg
Gopher Sign Co.
Henn Co. Dir Prop Tax
Henn Co. Finance
Henn Co. Treas.
Eugene Hickok & Assoc
Henn Co. Sheriffs Dept
Robert E. Johnson
Internal Revenue
Internatl Inst. Munic Clerks
Richard W. Johnson
Kromer Co.
Kelley & Kelley, Inc.
League of MN Cities
J.H. Larson Electric
The Laker
Doris Lepsch
Lutz Tree Service
Lake Mtka Conserv Distr.
City of Mound
MN Park Superv. Assn
Metro Waste Control
City of Minnetrista
MS Print
McCombs-Knutson
592.40
'32.69
1,383.00
69.13
176.17
9.14
24.00
13.80
58.5O
153.OO
334.O0
3,265.07
1OO.O4
1,110.99
39.85
7.OO
25.08
309.91
135.OO
3,O74.55
55.99
222.45
119.98
12.64
310.00
58.O8
1,745.58
20.00
1,545.OO
858.OO
393.75
41.36
54.OO
45.OO
3.OO
8.40
200.00
58.5O
525 OO
183 9O
45 O0
3,535 OO
1,998 5O
22 30
15 OO
1,262 25
396 OO
224 49
6,390.O0
Metro Waste Control
M i n negasco
Mound Fire Dept
Mound Medical Clinic
Wm Mueller & Sons
Jackie Meyer
City of Mound
Metro Fone
Mid Central Fire
M inn Comm
Mound Explorers
Martins Navarre 66
N.W. Bel 1
Navarre Hdwe
N.S.P.
Planning & Develop. Serv
Precision Striping
Recreon ics Corp
Reo Raj Kennels
Don Rother
Nels Schernau
Spring Park Car Wash
State of MN Documents
Sno Pros
Thurk Bros. Chev
Unitog
Veterinary Diagn Lab
Westonka Sanitation
Westonka chamber Commerc
Waconia Emerg. Physn
Xerox, I nc
Xerox, Inc.
Ziegler, /nc.
Griggs, Cooper
Johnson Bros. Liq
MN Distillers
Old Peoria
Ed Phillips
TOTAL BI LLS
19,277.27
115.92
.6,182.55
18.75
5,437.73
25.33
97.33
225.00
104.40
28.20
27.O0
54.OO
60.30
216.26
7,584.92
1,225.OO
414.00
188.75
291.OO
42.46
9.24
77.5O
2.10
lO5.OO
213.77
264.80
15.oo
5,452.50
20.00
28.50
" 82.72
1,546.39
87.74
2,136.13
4,374.89
1,132.90
1,318.84
1,264.91
91,011.89
01 parkdale drive ~
st. louis park, minnesota[
55416I
telephone 546-2334
June 7, 1982
Mr. Jon Elam, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Elam:
A few months ago we informed mayors and managers/administrators that
the Suburban Public Health Nursing Service and Visiting Nurse Service
of Minneapolis were exploring the possibility of some joint marketing
and some joint programming. This was being done in effort to minimize
service reduction in the face of diminishing financial support from
public sources and in effort to present a stronger united front in
the face of rapidly growing numbers of for profit and not for profit
home care agencies.
A joint task force was appointed and charged with responsibility for
study and recommendations for future combined efforts, including the
possibility of merger° A consultant was engaged to review agency
structures and to identify and oversee any steps needed in the trans-
action of organizational change.
The Suburban Public Health Nursing Service has been a part of your
community for many years. Its Board of Directors has scheduled a
meeting to share with you information ~about the changing market place,
the funding environment and task force recommendations.
Please meet with us on Thursday, June 24, 1982, 8 p.mo at the Golden
V~lley City Hall.
Sincerely,
Josehpine D. Nunn, President
Board of Directors
supported by tax Funds from municipalities of suburban henne~in county & the united way
3une 1, 1982
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, I.NC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS ii LAND SURVEYORS II PLANNERS
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
Mr. Tim Albers
Hardrives, Inc.
7200 Hemlock Lane North
Maple Grove, MN 55369
Subject:
Mound, Minnesota
1981 Street Project
File #5387
Dear Tim:
We have reviewed the 1981 Street Projects this week and have found the
following items yet to be completed. Some of these are from the punch list
from late last fall and were not able to be completed before freeze-up. Three
Points problems are as follows:
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Gas hut apron badly spalled - remove and replace.
Sod above apron at 5470 Three Points Boulevard.
Patch hole in bituminous N.E, radius Avocet.
Remove and replace settled bituminous behind aprons at Three Points
Tavern and Drews Electric.
Patch settlement around G.V. at Finch south side.
Fill and sod around bus shelter at Three Points and Gull.
Finish installing no parking signs.
5049 & 5057 - repair sod in front of walls (Mickman drove on it).
Dump 1 load of black dirt in low front yard at 5016 Three Points.
Grade and sod behind sidewalk S.E. corner Three Points & Sumach.
Remove and replace bituminous settlement across from wheelchair ramp
on S.E. corner Three Points & Sumach.
Remove Oituminous stockpile from vacant property on Oennings and
restore to original condition.
Remove and replace curb and gutter as marked on Oennings.
Remove and replace settled bituminous around G.V. at N.E. corner Three
Points & Dove.
There are also 65 dead trees and 22 more that are marginal on Three
Points Boulevard.
Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria - Eagan
printed on recycled paper
Mr. Tim Albers
Oune l, 1982
Rage Two
On Tuxedo Boulevard, we have had Twin City Testing out to determine the
cause of the wear course flaking off and leaving so much aggregate exposed. We
are waiting for their recommendations at this time. Other items to be cleaned
up out there are as follows:
Sod around N.H. behind curb and gutter at Brighton Commons.
Grade and rip rap wash out around flared end section across from
Brighton Commons.
Remove and replace driveway at 5042 Tuxedo.
Wear course peeled off at 5066, 5072, 5073, 5117, and 5134 Tuxedo.
Install baffle in catch basin N.H. just north of Sulgrove on east side
Tuxedo.
Nineteen dead trees.
We would appreciate these problems being cleaned up by July 1, 1982.
Sincerely,
MoCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
OAC: lar
cc: Jori Elam
WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS:
David H. Cochran, Pres. · Albert L. Lehman · James S. Russetl · ~ohn E. Thomas · Barbara Gudmundson
June 4, 1982
Dear Interested Citizen:
At the May 20, 1982, meeting of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District, no action was taken on revisions to the
Headwaters Control Structure Management Plan because the Board
of Managers had not yet met with all groups who had expressed
an interest. It was suggested that the topic might be
considered at the June meeting.
The Board later learned, however, that the District's
principal engineering advisor will be unavailable for that
meeting, as well as at least one manager, making it very
difficult for the Board to discuss the issue without their
presence. Therefore, deliberation of the management plan
revisions is now being scheduled for the July 15 meeting.
Members of the Board of Managers will make every effort to meet
with the remaining parties who have expressed an interest and
be prepared to consider the matter at that meeting.
If you have any questions, please'feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
David H. Cochran
President
DHC/mb
State Bank of MOUND
OFFICES AT SPRING PARK · MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
April 26, 1982
Mr. John Elam
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
.Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Elam:
We have reviewed your draft of the R~volving Loan Program which
was discussed on Friday, April 16th. We feel that under #1 the
bank will set a $100,000.00 loan program to start with to support
up to twenty-five seperate loans at prime rate with a maxim~ of
five year repayment program. This would allow each business up
to $4,000.00. If the City of Mound pays the difference between
the 12% and the prime rate at the time the loan is closed, it
should work as a positive program.
In the past week I have talked to three different commmities
that have in the last several years had a main street development
program. Hopefully, we have picked up soma do's and don'ts.
Should the need arise where the $100,000.00 loan program is not
sufficient to support all the requestes, wewill be happy to review
the dollar amount.
Please feel free to call on ma at any time.
Sincerely,
STATE BANK OF FDUND
Frank W. Hancuch,
President
cc: Mr. Paul Pond
cc: Mr. Jerry Longpre
SERVING THE WESTONKA AREA SINCE ~909
FACILITY
Hain Post Office
U. S. POSTALSERVICE . j DATE
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR SPACE I June
ILOCATION (City, State cod z,rP Code)
Mound, MN 55470
1. Bids will be received in the office of Robert Vogel, Branch Mana.Q. er, Field. Real Estate &
(No,me and Title)
Office, PO Box 69069, St. Paul, MN 55169-0069
9, 1982
Buildings
NOT LATER THAN
JUNE 23
(Address--P.O. J~ox, City, State and ZIP Code)
19 82 , to furnish space for postal purposes to be located within the following general area:
2. The approximate areas indicated below are desired:
ENCLOSED NET I DRIVEWAY, PARKING AN1 PLATFORM I
SPACE (Sq. Ft.) MANEUVERING (Sq. Fl.) (Sq. Ft.)
4800 19,000 / 350
3. Bidders shall specify annual rental for a basic lease term of 5
One - 5-year option
OTHER AREAS (Specify item cod square feet)
years, with separate and consecutive renewal options as follows:
4o
10.
PS Form
~,lay 1975
Bidders must submit with the bid a plot plan showing land location and dimensions, and location of buildings thereon, drlv. eways and
parking areas, abutting streets and alleys and widths thareof together with a floor plan of the interior space offered, showing dimensions,
offsets, doprs, windows, partitions, ceiling heights, columns, and other pertinent information.
~] Bids offering existing sp~ce only will be eligible for consideration.
Bidders may offer eithefexisting space, space to be modified, or facilities to be constructed.
A correct legal description of the entire ground area offered must accompany the bid. Bidders ere urged to submit photographs of their
property and its surroundings. If new construction or major remodeling is proposed, specifications, including a finish schedule, and a
drawing of the proposed front elevation shall accompany the bid. If an existing building or space in an existing building is offered, photo-
graphs of the existing front elevation shall accompany the bid.
ANY AWARD MADE UNDER THIS ADVERTISEMENT WILL BE MADE TO THAT RESPONSIBLE BIDDER WHOSE BID IS MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO
THE POSTAL SERVICE, PRICE AND OTHER FACTORS CONSIDERED. IMPORTANT FACTORS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATION,
GOOD DAYLIGHT AND VENTILATION, ACCESSIBILITY FOR PATRONS, ACCESSIBILITY TO MAIL LOADING AREAS FOR POSTAL VEHICLES,
SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS, AND OVERALL OPERATING COSTS. THE POSTAL SERVICE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE WITH BIDDERS
FOR BE~ER TERMS, CLARIFICATION OF AMBIGUITIES, MODIFICATION, OR OTHER CHANGES; TO SECURE OFFERS ON SUITABLE PROPERTIES
IN ADDITION TO THOSE OFFERED INITIALLY IN RESPONSE TO THIS INVITATION; AND/OR TO REJECT ANY AND ALL RIDS. THIS IS NOT A
SEALED BID ADVERTISEMENT AND OFFERS WILL NOT BE PUBLICLY OPENED. INFORMATION AS TO THE NUMBER OF OFFERS RECEIVED, THE
IDENTITY OF OFFERORS OR THE PROPERTIES OFFERED WILL NOT BE MADE AVAILABLE 'ro ANYONE WHOSE OFFICIAL POSTAL DUTIES DO
NOT REQUIRE SUCH KNOWLEDGE.
Each bidder shall submit with his bid a completed Form 7413, Lease Bidder's Qualifications; failure to furnish the required information
concerning qualifications may be cause for rejection of the bid.
~ No bid guarantee is required.
~ Bid ~uarantee is required. The bid guarantee must be submitted before bid opening in the form of either (1) a Bid Bond
Form 7414-C, io a penal amount equal to the annual rental rate, as bid, for the basic lease term, or a certified or cashi
equal to the annual rental rate, as bid, for the basic lease term, accompanied by Form 7403, Bid SecuriW, Ce~ der's Check.
~ ~o performance bond will be required.
0 The successful bidder shall submit, within 20days after acceptance of his biO,~f~a~.~ ~ond (ConstruedW o~m
7414-D,
a corporatff sureW certified as acceptable by the Treasury Department, in
~ _ tim~s the annual renta~ rate, as bid, of the basic lease term.
Page 1 of 2
I 1. ~] IN3 L~bo: and Materi~i Payment Bond will be required.
· '--: The succe~;ful bidder shall submit, within 20 days after acceptance of his bid, a Labor and Material P~yment Bond {Construction] on
Fo,m 7414.E, with a corporate sureW certified as acceptable by the Treasury Department, in a penal sum based on the required penal sum
of the Per'o,mance Bond. If the required penal amount of the Performance Bond is not more than Sl,OOO,OOO the Labor and Material Pay-
men~ B~nc sn~ll be in a p6nal amount which is 50% of the p6nal amount of {he Performance Bond; if the required pen~l amount of the
Performance Bond is mo-e than SI,000,CO0 but not more than S5~000,000, the Labor and Material Payment Bond shah be in a penal
amoun~ .,,5ich is 40~ of the p~nat amount cf the Performance Bond; if the required penal amount of the Performance Bond is more than
S5,000..300. ;h~ Labor snO Matgrigl Payment Bond shall be in the pena~ amount of S2,500,000.
12. The Postal Service shall have the right to require the bidder to furnish a Performance 9ond on Form 7414-Dand a Labor and Materlal
Paymen: Bond on Form 7414-E, with surety certified as acceptable by the Treasu~ Department, in such penal sumsas the Contracting
Officer may re ~ire. If required to furnish such bonds, the bidder shall furnish, within 30 days after the request, written assurance by the
surety that th~ required bonds will be issued. The bidder's failure to furnish such assurance within 30 days shall be grounds for rejection of
~h~ bid.
13.
14.
15.
16.
i7.
Bidders ~,e cautioned as foiIo;¥s: By signing hi~ bid, the bidder will be deemed to have signed and agreed to the provisions of the
°'Certlf:ca:ion of Nonsegregated Facilities" in this solicitation, The certification provides that the bidder does not maintain or provide for
his emp,oyees facilities which are segregated on a basis of race, creed, co"or, or national origin, whether such facillties ere segregated by
direct~.:, or on a de facto basis. The ce,tification also provides that he wii! not maintain such segregated [acilities. Fsilure of: a bidder to agree
to, th~ Ce:?.ifica,.ion of ;~cnsa?egated Facilities will render his bid nonresp~nsive to the terms of solicitations involvln9 awards of contract~
exceedL~ S10,009 which are not exempt from the provisions of the Equa~ Opportunity clause.
Each b:d~. shallcomplete, and submit with his bid, a Form 7319-B, Representations and Certifications.
Each b.:dder shatl state, in his bid, whether or not the premises offered are mortgaged and shall, if required after bid opening, furnish a'
Forms 7450, Mortgagee's Agreement, completed and executed by the mortgagee.
Gove-nment "penalty" envelopes may no~ be used for mailing bids without proper postage affixed thereto.
Additional requirements incorporated in, and made a part of this Invitation for Bids, are:
Property offered for lease in bids submitted under this advertisement must be
properly zoned tO permit use of same for a post offfice facility or capable of
being rezoned fog'such use without delay of remodeling and occupancy of the
proposed facility. The successful bidder shall be responsible for all actibn
necessary to obtain proper zoning.
Bid packages/plans are not available; please send the undersigned a letter
describing the space available, location (street address & legal description),
floor plan, site plan, photograph and the approximate rental price on an
"as is" basis, including provisions for utility charges.
!8.
Add;tioq-~! requirements, the lease form,, riders, the representations and c¢;tificatlons form, bond forms and addiUonal information may be
obtained from:
R. W. VAN SICKLE
Real Estate Specialist
Field Real Estate & Buildings Office
P. O. Box 69069
St. Paul, MN 55169-0069
612-725-7385
TITLE ROBERT VOGEL
Contracting Officer
Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
Mr. Gary D.-Plotz
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, ~ 55350
76 East Fifth S,reet
Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone (612) 298-7665
~une ~, 1982
Dear Mr. Plotz:
This is in response to your inquiry as to the classification
of the Hutchinson branch line.
Our 1982 System Diagram Map will be released in about three
weeks. At that time, I would suggest you contact me so we
can. review the future of this line.
~~, ~/Sincire lY,
Dennis W~/ McLeod
Director, Branch Line Management
LAKE
402 EAST LAKE STREET
MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRIC]
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473-7033
FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD MEMBERS
June 7, 1982
Rol~ert Tlpton Brown, Chairman
Greenwood
Frank FI. Hunt, Jr., Vice Chairman
Spring Park
Robert P. Fiasco¢), Secretary
Shorewood
Edward G. Bauman. Treasurer
Tonka Bay
Alan Fasching
Minnetrista
Orval R, Fenstad Mound
Fiichard J. Gacwood Deephaven
Jo Ellen Hurt Orono
Lois C. Johnson
Minnetonka Beach
M. Jerry Johnson Excelsior
Robert S. MacNemara Wayzata
Robert K. Pillsbury Minnetonka
Robert E. Slocum Woodland
Fiichard J. Soderberg Victoria
Mr. J. E. Regan
5334 Piper Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Regan:
In reply to your letter of May 28 to the City of
Mound regarding motorized racing on the Lake, you
will be happy to know that motorized vehicle races
have been prohibited by LMCD ordinance since
October, 1980. A copy of the pertinent Code
Sections 4.01, 4.151 and 4.40 are enclosed.
If a violation exists, please contact the Hennepin
County Sheriff's Water Patrol.
Your interest in our Save the Lake program is
appreciated.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Executive Director
FM:jm
gnc. '
cc: City of Mound/
Sheriff's Water Patrol
Orval R. Fenstad
PARK RESERVES
BAKER
CARVER
CROW-HASSAN
ELM CREEK
HYLAND LAKE
LAKE REBECCA
MURPHY-HANREHAN*
REGIONAL PARKS
CLEARY LAKE'
COON RAPIDS DAM
EAGLE LAKE
RSH LAKE
JAMES W. WiLKIE*
MEDICINE LAKE
SPRING LAKE'
SPECIAL USE AREAS
BAKER PARK GOLF COURSE
CLEARY LAKE GOLF COURSE*
HYLAND HILLS SKI AREA
NOERENBERG MEMORIAL
TRAIL CORRIDORS
NORTH HENNEPIN TRAIL
AER PARKS
TASSO ISLAND
GOOSE CHASE ISLAND
'SCOTT-HENNEPtN
PARK AUTHORITY
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM BARBEAU
CHAIR
MINNEAPOLIS
WILLIAM E. GENTRY
VICE CHAIR
NEW HOPE
JUDITH S. ANDERSON
BLOOMINGTON
SHIRLEY A. BONINE
MAPLE PLAIN
PHYLLIS CRIMMINS
MINNEAPOLIS
AMELIA M. DeMUSE
MINNEAPOLIS
CHARLES R. PIHL
ORONO
MALCOLM D. REID
SHOREWOOD
DONALD C, RINGHAM
MINNEAPOLIS
RAYMOND N. SEAGREN
MINNEAPOLIS
ANNE-MARIE SOLENSKY
MINNEAPOLIS
E. FRENCH
SUPERINTENDENT &
SECRETARY TO THE BOARD
Hennepin County Park Reserve Bistrict
3800 County Road 24 · Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 · Telephone 612'-473-4693
June 8, 1982
Mr. Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager
534] Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Kopp:
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 288, effective
January I, 1983, the Board of Commissioners of the Hennepin
County Park Reserve District will consist of seven members
rather than eleven, as it is now constituted. Under this
new structure, three members will be appointed by the Minnea-
polis Park and Recreation Board from among its membership.
Four will be elected from Commissioner districts, equal in
population, comprising the territory of Hennepin County out-
side the City of Minneapolis.
On June 3, 1982, the Board of Commissioners of the Hennepin
County Park Reserve District adopted a new redistricting plan,
in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 288, and u~ilizing
1980 U.S. Census figures. Enclosed is a copy of the adopted
plan for your information and use. If you have any questions
regarding the plan or its implementation, please feel free to
call Marilyn Egerdal, Administrative Assistant in my office, at
473-4693.
Sincerely,
Clif[on E. French
Superintendent and
Secretary to the Board
MCE:ghd
Enc].
-REC,~EATIO
~ROW'~
',HASSAN
MEOINA
PARK'".'
'- ~. ORONO
PLY/~'OUTH
GaOVE
MAP OF
HENNEPII J COUNT
-- CREEK
PAR'K
COON
RAPIDS
"DAM
REGIONAL
PARK. ·
BROOKLYN
DISTRICT
1ST
2ND
3RD
4TH
/S.OR~
CARVER
PARK
RESERVE
POPULATION
142,379
143,375
1 43,299
141 ,407
'3 0 0 ' a.¥~:
JAMES W.
WILKIE
REGIONAL
PARK
b
A.THOHAS WURST
GERALD t. CARROLL
CURTIS A. PEARSON
THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD
ALBERT FAULCONER ]3Z
JAt4ES D. LARSON
law OFFICES
WURST, CARROLL & PEARSON
I100 FIRST SANK PLACE WESt
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
June 10, 1982
TELEPHONE
(61;~) 338-8911
Mr. Jon Elam
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Re: Anti-trust
Dear Jon:
On the slim chance that you might not read the articl~
in the latest League of Minnesota Cities magazine on anti-trust,
I am enclosing a copy of that article. I believe it extremely
important that it be read and reviewed by each of the department
heads and, hopefully, by the members of the council. I agree
completely with the league lawyer who indicates that we must
have a "mindset" regarding anti-trust actions just as we do
currently for anti-discrimination matters. It should be on
our mental checklist so that it is considered before acting
or speaking on city business.
I am aware that the council is inundated with materials,
but if they would just become aware of the problem, we will
try to call to their attention the various pitfalls as they
arise.
Very truly~ours,
City Attorney
CAP:ir
Enclosure
aspects of purchasing, franchising,
licensing, land use, utility service
decisions and a host of' other
regulatory and proprietary activities.
Federal anti-trust laws include the
Sherman and Clayton Acts and forbid
agreements, combinations and con-
spiracies in restraint of trade, in-
cluding such things as price fixing,
division of markets and boycotts. The
act also limits attempts to
monopolize and predatory pricing.
Reasonable conduct may in the
future be held to provide a defense
to claims of alleged violations but
since reasonableness is likely to be a
jury question, considerable uncer-
tainty and therefore expense could
attend each case.
Prior to City of Lafayette v. Loui-
siana Power and Light Co., 435 U.S.
389 (1978) (no exemption from anti-
trust suits for city proprietary actions)
cities considered themselves exempt
from federal anti-trust actions. Prior
to Community Communications
Company v. City of Boulder, 102
S.Ct. 835 (1982) (see Court Decisions
in Minnesota Cities, May, 1982) most
anti-trust experts assumed that cities
were clothed with the exemption of
the states established in Parker v.
Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943) for ac-
tions of a regulatory nature. ~
most mayors and council members rai.~d the~2_.s_sibilit~, o(.~m_uni_cip~al
and even most city attorneys, liabJlit~whe~he_rth.~_actEv3ty~_sl)~ro-
However, in order to minimize the . ~orieG.ry or governraeptal: _2}.insi_cle or
potential financial drain from anti- 0iJ~side c:6rporate limits; 3),arguably
trust litigation, city officiab will now ma-n:d~,'ted by ~6~.e_""diffu~e 6r ]es~
need to keep in mind the potential t?n,. specific St~t-e-_p?i_cy:TNow cities
the~re is 1) 'a clearly articulated~and_
affirmatively expressed state policy_"
'"a[rC'ctin_~ [or ar_~uably authorizing)
t~e city tO displace cOmpetition with
-r~gulati0n 0r m0n0p01~ se}~ike:' 2)
V~ia ct~t~Jnt~r~t ~
free market; 3~ ~five supe~isiq~ of_
~ regulated or monopoly activity
~h~ther th~[ active
state supervision c~n be largely Ioca
w~ for example, a requirement to
fear"to a state agency is an open
q~ '"
Until the law' is clarified and
municipal practice is modified to ac-
commodate the new free market
climate ~rff are li~v to be sub,tan-
rial numbers of anti-truSt ~bits~ ma~
~ore threats 0f-su~:-~
publ~ mOney ~x~ended reviewing
~_dde~ing anti-trust c~im~
c~~~scrim~natioa mindset,
sidera~o~s ~fore actin~ and bede
even speaEm~ on c~ty busmefs. ~ey
Iy through channels (i.e. formal
meetings) and keep a well
documented record through
minutes, formal findingS, resolutions,
etc., se~in~ out exactty what was
done and why. Officials will soon get
a feel for the subje~s which are
dangerous and why. Most cities will
find it prudent to go luther, affir-
matively invento~ing their current
and future problem areas and
· MUNICIPAL TANK AND TOWER Co.
NEW RISERS
Box 248, Sioux Falls, So. Dak. 57101 PHONE 605-743-5425
WELDING NEW ROOFS
SANDBLASTING
BOARD OF HEALTH AND AWWA APPROVED INTERIOR COATINGS
INSULATED FROST JACKETS OF DOUBLE METAL CONSTRUCTION
BONDED ,
MEMBER AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION
TWENTY-FOUR HOUR
EMERGENCY. SERVICE
PAINTING
NEW SHELLS
INSURED
22
MINNESOTA CITIES
i
establishing a compliance program.
Somepositive steps might?clude:
or quotes even when ti~-eia-w do~6't
requ~r-e-it. ~,void use 0f veh-~or-F't'~rL
Avoid purchasing from vendors in
deci~,ion rnaker-~i'n t'Ee'pu'~c~fia~ifig
prc~cess has an ~t~ere.~t.
f~mmunications
wit]~ .suppliers. Don't accept gifts
fro~, 2) PI~ 'Z(~n,~'~'g~,
Development and Redevelopment.
Cie r.~.~____~et out the. goverh~ental ob-
jectives to be achieved. Be SG?e~h~y
are ~-6'fTh-'-~e trouble
regulating. Limit your city in-
terf~'e~-~i[g"
c'esses to th~ I~;;~~TO~n~
governmental and planning objec-
tive~/6on'~ ~Ji0~=iE~-~-eiEi~l'in-
teres]s ~ei~g feg~~n~o~led
to~~uence your ~lan-
ni6g c o m m ~~t~}~'&~ o ry
b~~~°rmai ap-
plication pebtib6igg ~-[~Stimony
proCess. 'M~ke a Ci~aE~e-~brd ~f all
c~ ~ti°ns"~nd~E~ reasons for those
Bus~~oid tying (conditioning
the sa e of on' ~ p~~.,"~ater,
on the sale of another like
elecTfi~:'itry).''- AVoTd "-6~ ~'~asdnable
p r i ce-~-c-r i m i n at i o n-~'g'&'-~$ ~'~ f_u.! ..to
j~~'t rate for'a'sers out-
s,'-d'~h~~A~,oid sh'ar~ litigation to
w_eake~0 competitors. Avoid bond
co~i'[:'E' ~'~.m-i?~' ~'o 'k~p
ofit coml~&~i[0r~i" 4) Licensing and
R~~-Ti:e a t '-~-p'pl ic-a-n t s,
evenhandedly, affording
~33a'~ly~ there'-should' be
desirable actiyi~y will .~gt. g0 :~o~rd
W~'~0Ut the protection of an ex-
clu~iv~franchise, or ihat th&-adtiVity
by~ nature will'become a ~onop0-
ly~hich n~-a] com~i[i~~ ffree
mark~g ' ~i][ ngC~igffifiegfi'tly
i~'p~cL In these cases,"mgulation
the only realisti~-co'nfrol/~[~, may
or ~-this~ategory. It is
a~ly not an ~: ~:~e so
~ technological _developments
may qT~t ........ i~s ..... ~°n°-
~ly powers. Don't 'unreasonably
regt'ri~T licensed, fran~i~d~or
regaled business. ~'~.-
Since b~eaffyb~iculated and affir-
matively expressed decision of the
state to supplant..~hi~t~
regulation is a defense, cities may
want to look for or attempt to secure
state legislation directing any action
that is clearly going to raise anti-trust
questions. No doubt clear state
legislation will be difficult to secure
in most cases because the parties to
be regulated will lobby the legislature
also. Furthermore, once the state
directs and supervises, a significant
measure of local sovereignty has
been surrendered.
There is hope for federal legislative
relief and this route may provide
cities with their best opportunity to
avoid large anti-trust efforts and ex-
penditures. However, no federal el-
fort can be successful without a
substantial campaign by local of-
ficials to modify the current law.
Communicate with your congres-
sional representatives about city anti-
trust problems.
A further discussion of anti-trust
problems and strategies will be
presented at the .League of Min-
nesota Cities Convention in
Rochester on Friday, June 18, at 2:30
at the Holiday Inn at the annual
meeting of the Minnesota Associa-
tion of City Attorneys. Non-attorneys
are invited to sit in if they are in-
terested.
FIRE-POLICE-MUNICIPAL
& HOSPITAL
FETY EQUIPMENT
Fixec~ Extinguishment Systems:
Halon - CO~ - Dry Chemical
HOSE - Fire, Municipal Sewe~
& Skating Rink
· BADGES - Fire-Police-CD
EXTINGUISHERS - Portable
and Fixed
PLECTRON Encoders, Decod-
ers, Monitocs and Pagers
MINNESOTA FIRE, INC.
2476 UNIVERSITY AVE.
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
612-646-1374
Contact HAROLD BARTHOLOW-
CONSULTANT
June 1962
23
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES,. INQ
529 South Seventh Street Suite 535 Minneapol'i~, MN 55415 612.332-4166
N E MO RAN D UM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mound Downtown Advisory Committee
Rob Chelseth, City Planner
4 June 1982
Policies and Procedures for Administration of Downtown
Commercial Building Rehab Loan Program.
At this time the Committee is rapidly working toward the completion
of plans for physical improvements to the downtown. The next
phase of this process will be.turning these paper plans in
"bricks and motar" reality. To accomplish this, the City has
targeted a.total of $45,000 toward rehabilitation work financing
and design services. The following guide has been drafted
suggesting a means and methodology for distributing these funds.
Please take a few minutes to study the proposed process, and imagine
how it will function in downtown Mound.
Given our objective of soliciting loan applications this summer,
it is important we review these procedures and advance them on t~
the City Council for approval as soon as possible. Therefore if
time permits, you may wish to discuss them at our next meeti'ng.
klw
MOUND CBD COMMERCIAL BUILDING REHAB LOAN PROGRAM
The purpose of this program is to provide financing at attractive interest
rates to stimulate the rehabilitation of commercial buildings in downtown
Mound in response to the new improvement plan. During Year VIII of the Mound
Community Development Block Grant (begins July 1st, 1982) the City has budgeted
$40,000 for interest subsidies on rehab loans for commercial buildings. This
procedure is viewed as the most effective way of bo~h leveraging the available
funds, and making the largest amount of money available as quickly as possible.
An additional sum of $5,000 will also be made available during Year VIII of
the CDBG program to help underwrite design costs incurred during the develop-
ment of plans for rehabilitation work. Finally, some administrative funds will
be made available to assist in the preparation, rating, review and administra-
tion of loans and loan applications.
A Commercial Rehab Loan Program
The $40,000 in CDBG funds will be used to pay a portion of the interest
charged by banks on $100,000 in loan monies.
These funds will be loaned by local bank(s) following their standard loan
procedures and requirements; however, the loan applicants will~lso submit
a separate preliminary loan application tQ a~special downtown loan qualifica-
tion review committee, who will evaluate the application in terms of a set of
criteria aimed at achieving the objectives of the downtown plan. In summary,
the loans will be judged on their fin~n__cj~-mer]t, and the extent to which
they reflect the objectives of th~'downtown revitalizatio
Terms of the Loan
Discussion with Mound's bank indicate the standard rehabilitation loan for
a commercial structure has a five year term, and is available at a fixed
interest rate near the current prime lending rate. The State Bank of Mound
has agreed to set up a loan pool of $100,000 to initiate the program. At
this time, the prime rate is around 17 percent; given $40,000 of interest-
subsidy, the CDBG funds would potentially reduce the interest rate by some
12 points, to an effective interest rate of about 5 percent on the loan.
The remaining issue deals with the maximum size of individual loa~s. Al-
though this will be determined through the loan applicants ability tb secure
and repay the loan, a'ceiling should be established to in~ure one ok two
large borrowers do not monopolize the funding. A maximum loan of $20,000
is suggested, allowing for the high costs associated with many forms of reha6
construction.
Example of Loan Subsidy Operation
Standard Loans: $100,000 - 5 years @ 17% Total Monthly Payments = $2,485.26
Total Interest Paid = $49,~15.60
- $40,000.00 (CDBG interest subsidy)
$ 9,115.60 (actual interest paid)
Special Loans *~$100,000 - 5 years with subsidy: Total Monthly
Payments = $1~818.59
Revised interest rate = Less Than 5%. ~
MOUND CBD COMMERCIAL REHAB LOAN APPLICATION AND APPROVAL PROCESS
The process begins with the City .Council appointing a CBD Loan Qualification
Committee, charged with reviewing loan applications and recommending loans
for funding to the City Council.
1. A 60 day application period is set - announcing the amount of commercial
loan monies available for the year and application procedures.
2. Property Owner or Lessee (Borrower) contact the City of Hound for
information and preapplication screening regarding the Primar~ Eligibility
Requirements. The Borrower completes a checklist to determine if the
request meets the programs general eligibility requirements, requirements
for applicant and property eligibility, and the activities and costs
eligible under the program (See Attachment I).
3A. If Borrower fails to meet the Primary Eligibility Requirements, the
application process stops. Borrower may appeal to the CBD Loan Qualifica-
tion Committee or resubmit a modified proposal.
3B. If all of the Primary Eligibility Requirements are met, the Borrower
receives a description of the loan application process, loan application
forms and is directed to contact a bank participating in the program.
At this i~ime, Borrower may apply for a grant up to $1,000 to be used for
design work on building and building site rehabilitation plans.
4. The Borrower submits a .completed loan application form to the CBD Loan
Qualification Committee consisting of:
e
a. Code inspection of structure.
b. Project description following
objective/subjective ranking
criteria. (See Attachment II).
c. Initial project plans.
d. Total cost estimates.
e. Loan amount request.
f. Other sources of rehabilitation
funding being used on the
project.
g. Project schedule/completion dates.
The CBD Loan Qualification Committee reviews all completed applications on
the basis of feasibility and the .established Secondary Objective/Subjective
Ranking Criteria. The Committee ranks the applications, recommending
the highest:scoring applications for funding. The Mound City Council
reviews the Committee's recommendations for loans, and grants'approvals
contingent upon the applicant receiving approval from the participating
bank providing 100 percent of.the financing required to complete tile re-
habilitation project.
6. Following the approvals of the CBD Loan Qualification Committee and Mound
City Council, the"highest ranked applicant(s) for Which funds are avail-
able submit loan applications to their participating banks for loan ap-
proval. The right to decline to participate in any loans on the bas~s o~
credit evaluation,, project feasibility or loan quality standards is reserve~
as a full, undisputed decision of the participating bank.
7. The contacted bank completes its standard loan application review process.
8. Once the Borrower has received approval.for 100 percent of the financing
of rehabilitation costs from~the bank, the Borrower enters into an
agreement with the bank and City ~f Mound covering the Terms and Conditions
under which the loan is to be made. This will include standard pro-
visions utilized by the banks participating in the Mound loan rehabilitation
program. ~
ATTACHMENT I -.
Primary Eligibility Requirements
These criteria would insure the applicant,, the property, and the proposed
activities ire basically eligible under the CBD Loan Program. For example,
is the project in the downtown area, does the person have ownership or ap-
proval of the owner, etc. A detailed outline of these primary eligibility
requirements follows as Attachment I.
Secondary Objective/Subjective Rankin9 Criteria
Once it is determined that the applicant basically qualifies, the second
question becomes one of how do the applications compare among each other in
terms of achieving the downtown plan objectives. Here both objective
(quantifiable) and subjective (qualitative) criteria will be considered. At-
tachment II presents a starting list of objective/subjective criteria from
which the Committee will evaluate applications.
PRIMARY ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR LOAN APPLICANTS, THEIR PROPERTY AND
PROPOSED ACTIVITIES
A. General - A rehabilitation loan may be made only with respect to commercial
or mixed residential-commercial use properties located within the Mound
Downtown Strategy Area. The applicant must secure approval of the loan
through convential sources, and must meet established minimum eligibility
requirements. Commercial property shall mean property which is engaged
in the sale of goods or services to the general public and/or is an income
producing investment. Mixed-use property shall refer to property for
which the ground level will be used, after rehabilitation, for commercial
purposes, and no more than 50% of 'the building will be used for residential
and common space purposes.
B. Applicant Eligibilit~ - Loan applicant must:
1. Own the'property under consideration or be the purchaser occupant of.
the property under a land sales.£ontract or any similar agreement'
Ce
De
for the purchase of real property.
2. In order for a commercial lessee to be considered for a l~an, he/she
must first ~ave the written permission from the owner of the~structure.
Property Eligibil'ity - The property must:
1. Be located within the Mound downtown area.
2. Require corrective measures necessary to bring the property up to :
city mechanic21 system deviciencies, and/or to upgrade exterior
conditions that are detrimental to the downtown environment., and/or
new additions or additions to existing structures. Completed improve-
ments must also comply with the priority for repairs as set forth by
the loan program.
3., Properties must have all delinquent property taxes paid in full and
be in conformance with zoning and other city codes.
Project Scope Eligibility
1. General - A rehabilitation loan may be made only with respect to
property in need of improvement in accordance with the priorities
outlined under Allowable Costs, and in line with the priority repairs'
as determined by the Loan Qualification Committee'and through consul-
tation with the applicant.
2, Allowable Costs - In addition to those costs for rehabilitation neces-
sary to make the property conform to the minimum standards of the City
of Mound building codes, a rehabilitation loan may also me made to
underwrite the following costs.
a. Exterior improvements that will protect the property from climatic
conditions leading to deterioration and/or will lead to the improve-
ment of the appearance of the downtown and esthetic enhancement
consistent with adopted downtown plans and design themes.
b. Improvements which will increase the overall usefulness of the
property for commercial purposes including limited parking,
landscaping and the addition of service and delivery entrances in
accordance wi~h downtown plans.
c. Critical Deficiencies - Remedy a condition within the structure
which at the time of inspection is believed to contribute to the
overall state of deterioration.
d. Long term maintenance; mechanical system deficiencies (heating,
plumbing, electrical); and structural deficiencies (roof, foundation,
chimney, etc.).
Energy conservation measures such as insulation, combination storm
windows, etc.
Building permits, architectual fees, and related fees as included
in the contract with contractors.
ATTACHMENT II
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE/SUBJECTIVE RANKING CRITERIA
The following categories offer both objective and subjective ranking criter'ia.
Since objective criteria are normally associated with measurable or quantifiable
terms, they have been listed in a group with assigned "points". Subjective
or qualitative criteri'a are listed together for comparison purposes'.
Objective/Quantifiable Criteria
Measurement
Criteria To Evaluate Application
Financing
one point for each thousand
dollars
five po~gts for each business
cooperating in a coordinated
application
e
Commits additional private funds
to leverage low interest loan p~ovide
Proposes cooperative effort with ad-
jacent properties to achieve saving
in costs in construction, etc.
Public Services
one point for three spaces pro-
vided
one point for each 250 sq ft
five points for building con-
nections
1. Provision of additional parking
0
Provision of public open spaces
Provision of connected or protected
pedestrian access to other CBD
facilities.
three points per job
two points per job
one point for each ten thousand
dollars of estimated increased
taxable value
Economic --
1. Number of new jobs created
2. Number of existing jobs retained
3. Estimated increase in taxable
value of real property improvements
/$?/
Subjective/qualitative Criteria
Prioritx
High
H'igh
High.
High
Downtown Plan Implementation
1. Project retains and/or repairs store.fronts and rears
including, windows, sash, doors, transom, sign~ge and' '-
decorative features that contribute to the architectual
character of the building and downtown.
2. Where existing store fronts are too deteriorated to save,
retain the commercial character of the building through
designs that are consistent with the scale, materials,
color and texture of downtown design plans.
3. In terms of the building site, retain or install plantings,
trees, fencing, signs, benches, lighting, walkways, and so
forth that follow downtown design themes. -
4. Utilize signage scaled and designed in accordance with
downtown plan recommendations.
General Community Development
1.
Project is proposed as part of an area improvement scheme
for a specific block or building group.
2. Project emphasizes retail commercial or service use of floor
space.
3. Project will remove or repair deteriorated or underulitized
structures.
4. Project will provide improved access between buildings and
parking areas.
Proposal No:
FROM 4,?-~,'w '
Propo'sal Submitted To Work To Be Performed At
Name Street
Street City
City Date of Plans
State Architect
Telephone Nbmber
We h~reby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of
JJn material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings
d specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner: for the sum
with payments to be made as follows:
Any alteration or deviation {rom above specifications involving extra costs,' will be executed only upon written orders, and will
become an extra charge aver and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents ar delays beyond our
control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public
Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by //4') ./k'x~ /~/,~/~/~//'~-,g, ~,. t.'):~--c'c,/'?>~//x,-? c'~ .
Note--This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within ?;C~) days
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above prices, specificatlons and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as
specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
~ccepted. Signature
Date Signature
TOPS FORM 3450
_ · COLOR SPECIALISTS
· CUSTOM MATCHING
~~ CLINfONa GULES ' BRUSH, ROLLER & Dote ~"--
\ , L.__--~."~,e~;:,'~L?~,'~,~ ....:., ,,? '. 4431 DORCHESTER RD ·
--EST 1966-
MOUND
Proposal Submitted To Work. To Be Performed At
Name C,/.,'". . Uc o,- Stree,._
_ City State
City /1,~,-;,,.,,,,.-.~ Date of Plans
State /'1'/,"" ' Architect
Telephone Number c/7 ,).. -/'.~-~/
We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform oil the labor necessary for the completion of
· ,_~.[.,~ , ;''¢'~G ',
? %,0,,.?..~..,r[,~. f~u~'l~,,,.~). /~.~.,..,~ r,/~,~l/¢,;. ~,"~r ,,..~.'e . .
Mt. ,'~.~ n.,h. r~ ,~1,~ ' ' ,' ' V
All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawl
and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of
Dollars ($ /'2Y'Y', ~'A h
with payments to be made as follows:
Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will
become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our
control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public
Liabil;ty Insurance on above work to be taken oul by~ (.~'/,-'~--'.
Per
Note ~ This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within ~ o days
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Io dc, the work as
specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Accepted . Signature
Date . ·.Signature
RESIDENTIAL
2199 SHADYWOOD ROAD
WAYZATA. bAN. 5539
PROPOSAL and CONTRACT
CONME RCIAL
471-8219
6 - 15 82
Date ,19 __
TO l%und public Works Dep. ·
4845 ?,{anchester Road, )!ound, .'::{n..55364
Dear S/r:
_!' propose to finmish all mater/Ms and perform all labor necessary to complete the {o~lowing:
1. Sandblast paint off side of '~aildihg.
5-
,}ri,:~m ~.nd fir~ah .coat ~!! trim.
All of the above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner according to stan.d~.d
practices for the sum of.Two thousand three hundred eighty five --Dollars ($~;~ ~,~-~
Payments to be made
as the work progresse~
to the value of per cent ( , 5g) of all work completed. The entire
amount Of contract to be paid within_ days after completion-
Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of material or labor will
only be executed upon w!itten orders for sa.me, and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned
in this contract. All agreements must be made in reciting.
Respectfixlly submitted.
t
ACCEPTANCE
You are hereby authmized to furnish all materials and labor required to complete the work mentioned
in the above proposal, for which agree to pay the amount mentioned in said proposal,
and according to the terms thereot.
ACCEPTED
19
/$6"O
May 28, 1982
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
Mr. Butch Essig
Surfside, Inc.
2670 Commerce. Blvd.
Mound, MN. 55364
Dear Butch,
Thank you again for the lunch the other day. It was helpful to get a first
hand view of the I.R.S. situation. ! am doing what I can 'to try and quell
the rumors on it.
On the issue of the property.taxes, I am not so sure that I can be of as
much help. Enclosed is a'copy of the City Ordinance Chapter 11, Subd. ll
which says:
(1) "No license shall be granted, or renewed, for ope~atlon on any
premises on which taxes, assessments, or bther financial claims
of the City are delinquent and unpaid."
Clearly, the Ordinance would have to be amended which I' think would raise
the opportunity for people anywhere in the City to not pay their property
taxes as required. I think the flak the Council would receive would be
too great. But assuming that obstacle was overcome, Chapter 340.1~ of the
State Statutes (page 4923) states:.
(b)' "That the licensee will pay to the municipality when due all taxes,
license fees, penalties and other charges provided by law."
The law states t.hat property taxes are due May 31 and October 31 of each
year. Thus i.t does seem to me that a serious problem does exist. I
will check with the City Attorney on it, but I am not optimistic and think
you really need to plan accordingly.
Sorry my news isn't any bett~r.
know immediately.
If I come up with anything, I'll let you
Sincerely,
Jon Elam
City Manager
JE:fc
eric.
Division 1
Chapter ll - Page 9
Subdivision 10. Person Ineligible for License.
ed to or held by any person:
No license shall be grant-
(1) Who is ineligible under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 3hO.
(2) Under 21 years of age.
(3) Who is not of good moral character and repute.
(h) Who, if an individual, is an alien.
(5) Who, within-five years prior to the application for such license, has
been convicted of any willful violation of any law in the United States, '~
the State of Minnesota, or any other state or territory, or of any local
ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possess-
ion for sale or distribution of intoxicating liquor, or whose liquor lic-~
ense has beeu revoked for any willful violation of any such laws or ord-
inances.
(6) Who is a manufacturer or wholesaler of intoxicating liquor.
(?) Wh° is directly or indirectly interested in any other establishment
in the '.'J~i~y!.~ to which a license of the same class has been issued under
this section. The word 'interested' as used in this .rmragraph includes
any pecuniary interest in the ownership, operation, ~anagement or profits
of such an establishment.
(8) Who, if a corporation, does not have a manager who is elegible pur,
suant to the provisions of this section.
(9) Who is the spouse of a person ineligible for a License under para-
graphs h,5, or 6 of this subdivision and who, in the judgment of the
'Yu'Tz~.£~ Council, is not the real party in interest or beneficial owner
of the business operated, or to be operated, under the license.
Subdivision ll. Ineligibility for License. Existence of any of the following
conditions rende~any applicant ineligible for receipt of a license:
(1~ No license shall be granted, or renewed, for operation on any pre-
mises on which taxes, assessments, or other *inanci~l claims of the
C.~ty are delinquent and unoaid.
(2) No license shall be granted .for $ foreign corporation.
(3) No license shall be i~sued for the premises o~med by a person to
whom a license may not be granted under this section, except an owner who
is s minor or an alien.
C - 1 - 1971
MINNESOTA STATUTES 340.12 - Excerpt from:
340.12 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE.
As to "off sale" and "on sale" dealers:
(a) That the licensee will obey the law relating to such licensed business;
(b) That theJicensee x~Stl_ pay to the municipality when dhe all taxes~ license fe~s~
penfil~ies-and-ot_h_e.r._c_h/~rge_s' pr'or!ded 15y I~[ ~ ....
(c) That in the event of any violation of the provisions of any law relating to the
retail "off sale" and retail "on sale" of intoxicating liquor, such bond or policy shall be
forfeited to the municipality in which such license was issued;
(d) That the licensee, will pay to the ex-tent of the pr/ncipal amount of such bond
or policy, any damages for death or injury caused by or resulting from the violation of
any provisions .of law relating thereto, and in such cases recovery under this para-
graph may be had from the surety on this bond or policy. The amount specified in
such bond or policy is declared to be a penalty, the amount recoverable to be mea-
sured by the actual damages; provided, however, that in no case shall such surety be
liable for any amount in excess of the penal amount of the bond or policy.
All such bonds or policies shall be for the benefit of the obligee and all persons
suffering damages by reason of the breach of the conditions thereof. In .the event of
the forfeiture of any such bond or policy for violation of law, the district court of the
county wherein such licensed business was carried on may forfeit the penal sum of
said bond or policy, or any part thereof, to the state or municipality named as obligee
in such bond or policy.
[ Ex1934 c 46 s 6; 1943 c 501 s 2; 1943 c 568 s I; 1945 c 313 s I; 1959 c 540 s 5;
1976 c 5 s 11 ] (3200-26)