The URL can be used to link to this page

82-08-03MouNb CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday, August 3, 1982 7:30 P.M. -City Hall CITY OF MOUND A G E N D A Mound, Minnesota 1. Minutes of July 27, 1982, Regular Meeting ~. PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Street Vacati66 - North 10 feet of North Beachside Road between Shorewood Lane and Lake Minnetonka~ adjacent to Lot 19, Block 2, Shadywood Point, except for a small, area around the Lift Station 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS A. Case No. 82-135 Alleene L. Butterfield, 4862 Leslie Road Lot 14 and Part of Lot 15, Block 21, Wy~hwood MAP 12 Request 14 foot Variance - Street Front B. Case No. 82-136 James A. Evenson, 2879 Tuxedo Blvd. Lot 15-22, Block 10, Avalon and all of vacated Montgomery Road MAP 13 Lot-Split/Preliminary Subdivision C. Case No. 82-137 Harold J. Pond Sports Center, 2121 Commerce Blvd. - Part of S. 200 ft. of NE¼ lying E. of Nly ext of W Line of Lot 17, Lynwold Park Sign Permit for Sports Center 4. Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present (please limit to 3 minutes) 5. Continuation from June 22, 1982, Meeting - "An Ordinance Establishing Wetland Areas and Regulations and Provision of Fees" 6. Change Order to Hard Surface the Parking Lot by Mound Bay Park Total Cost $4,691.00 to be paid from Lawcon Grant 7. Proposed Parking Changes on Edgewater Drive 8. Applications for Set-Up License & 3.2 Beer License 9. Request to Combine Lots in Order to Remove Special Street Assessment Unit Charge - Gary J. Erdman, 2606 Westedge'Blvd. IO. Request to attend National League of Cities Conference - December, 1982. ll. Information/Miscellaneous A. Flyer on Mental Health Conference - August 10, 1982 B. Hutchinson Chamber of Commerce C. Agreement from Bill Husbands D. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Conference - September 24, 1982 Pg. 1818-1824 Pg. 1825~1832' Pg. 1833 Pg. 1834-1837 Pg. 1838-1841 Pg. 1842-1843 Pg. 1844-1850 Pg. 1851~1852 Pg. 1853 Pg. 1854-1856 Pg. 1857-1862 Pg. 1863-1867 Pg. 1868-1869 Pg. 1870-1871 Pg. 1872-1874 Pg. 1875-1876 Page 1817 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL 153 July 27, 1982 Pursuant to due call and notice' thereof, a regular meeting of the'City Council of th~ City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on July 27, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. Those present were: Mayor Rock Lindlan, Councilmembers Pinky Charon, Robert Polst0n and Gordon Swenson. Councilmember Donald Ulrick was absent and excused. Also present were: City Manager Jon Elam, City Clerk Fran Clark and the following interested persons: Jim Paradise, Willard Botko, Ronald Cloud, Earl Lindskoog, Margaret and Bob Hanson, Gary Paulsen, Ron Gehring, Patzy D-Avlza. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendahce. MINUTES The.Minutes of the Special Meeting of July 20, 1982, were presented for consideration. The Mayor.had two.corrections..One on ~page'147, Jim Stark is the State'Tournament Director. One on page 149 under Comments & Suggestions should read, "Stan Drahos voiced his approval of the City Council decision on the Surfside matter and stated more citizens should support the Council." Pols.ton moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the July 20, 1982, Special.Meeting as corrected[ The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING - DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS Mayor Lindlan Openedthe public hearing for input on any of the delinquent utility bills from persons present. Hearing no objections or comments, he closed the public hearing. Polson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-204 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DELINQENT UTILITY BILLS iN THE AMOUNT OF $3,056.25 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUTOFF WATER SERVICE FOR THESE DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS Motion carried. A. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ARCADE The City Manager reported the the applicant has withdrawn his application for the Conditional Use Permit for an arcade at 5559 Shoreline Blvd. He recommended refunding the applicants $100.00 because the City has not incurred any costs. Mayor Lindlan moved and Councilmember Swenson seconded a motion to authorize a refund of $100.00 to Rodney W. Storrusten. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION/LOT SPLIT - WILLARD J. BOTKO - LOTS I, 2~ 3., &4, BLOCK 8, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADD'N TO LAKESIDE PARK The City Manager explained that with this lot split both lots will be 154 July 27, 1982 in excess of lO,O00 square feet and will be conforming. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the subdivision dividing Lot 1 and part of Lot 2 away from the other part of Lot 2 and Lots 3 and 4; making parcels a minimum depth of 80 feet. There~ were also recommendations by the Building Inspector as~follows: 1. Submit a new survey with required legal descriptions, resetting of property.monuments, and lot sizes in square footage. 2'. The location of utilities servicing the existing structure and topography of the site be placed on the survey. 3. Any additional unit charges be assessed against the newly created site. 4. The present structure be placed on the survey. 5. Signatures of all the owners of the property be submitted. 6. Failure on the part of the petitioner to submit a final, plat of the lot-spilt per Section 22.13 within one year from the date of this approval shall deem the preliminary approval null and void, unless, a written extension'is applied for and approved. Swenson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-205 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE.THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION/LOT-SPLIT - LOTS 1, 2, 3, & 4, BLOCK 8,'ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADD'N TO LAKESIDE PARK The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. C. SIDE YARD VARIANCE - RONALD T. CLOUD - LOT 46~ WHI.pPLE SHORES Mr. Cloud was present and explained that he purchased the home on a trade and wants to replace the fenced area with a 2½ car garage with living space above. The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of side yard variance with the stipulation that the addition doesn't encroach any closer on rear yard property line.than it presently does. The Council asked that a new survey be submitted before a Building Permit is issued. Swenson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-206 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE SIDE YARD VARIANCE AS REQUESTED - LOT 46, WHIPPLE SHORES - SUBJECT TO A NEW SURVEY BEING SUBMITTED BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED AND RECOGNIZING THE EXISTING NON-CONFORMANCIES. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 155 July 27, 1982 FRONT YARD gARIANCE.- EARL R.'LINDSKOOG ; LOT 4~, PHELPS PARK IST.OIVIS'ION Mr. Lindskoog was present and explained that he is requesting this variance so he can'build an 18 foot 6 inch by 24 foot 4 inch attached garage. It will be within 8 feet of his front property line. The entrance to the garage would be from the south. The C!ty Manager explained that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this street front variance. Polston moved and Swenson seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-207 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE FRONT YARD VARIANCE ON LOT 49, PHELPS PARK 1ST DIVISION BECAUSE OF AN EXTREME TOPOGRAPHY HARDSHIP The vote was unanimOusly in favor. Motion carried. DAC REPORT -'DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES The City Manager reported~that this is the Downtown Advisory Committee's recommended Downtown Commercial R~J~abili.tation LOan` Program, Policies and Procedures. This recommendation would be the general guidelines for using the HUD money for downtown rehabil:itation. The Council discussed the recommended policies and procedures. The Mayor questioned'the length of the loan time stating .that he thought the loans should.not exceed l0 years. Swenson moved .and Polston seconded that following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-208 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAMs POLICIES & PROCEDURES AS PRESENTED The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Manager explained that along with approving this program the 'Council would need to appoint a Loan Qualification Committee. Polston moved and Swenson seconded the following resolution RESOLUTION #82-209 RESOLUTION SETTING'UP AND APPOINTING PAUL POND, RUSSELL PETERSON AND JON ELAM AS THE LOAN QUALIFICATION COMMITTEE Swenson moved and Charon seconded the following amendment the Resolution 82-220: ADDING THAT IF EITHER PAUL POND OR RUSSELL PETERSON COULD NOT ACCEPT THE APPOINTMENT, THE CITY MANAGER COULD REPLACE WITH SOMEONE ELSE The vote on the amendment was unanimously in favor. Amendment carried. The vote on the original resolution was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 156 July 27, 1982 The Mayor emphasized the importance of all Councilmembers attending the Downtown Advisory Commmittee Meeting, July 28, 1982, to go over the entire downtown plan with the business people end the community in general. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT The Mayor asked for any comments or suggestions from cltizens present. were none. I~ID APPROVAL - WELL #8 ON ISLAND PARK There The City Manager explained that bids were received today for Well #8 on Island Park. 3 bids were received: .... 1. Kaderlik Well Co. A & B - No Bid i. A & C - $54,117.25 2. Keys Well Drilling A & B - $51,440.OO A & C ~ No Bid 3. E.H. Renner & Sons A & B - $45,710..O0 A & C - $36,896.00 The-Engineer has recommended approval of the low bidder E~ H. Renner & Sons in the amount of $36,896.00~ Swenson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-210 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOW BID OF E.H. RENNER & SONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,896.00 FOR WELL NO 8 AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF THE NECESSARY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. SPORTS CENTER APPLICATIONS - 3.2 BEER PERMIT AND SET-UP PERMIT The City Manager reported that Ind. School Oist #277 and Ind. School District #278 have both. submitted.letters to the City regarding beer and set-ups being allowed in the Pond Sports Arena for fund raising events. School Dist. #277 did not object to the granting of a permit for August 6, 1982. School Dist. #278 was not in favor of the City issuing permits for the sale of intoxicating beverages in the Arena. Swenson moved and Polston seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-21 1 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION 3.2 BEER PERMIT AND A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION 1 DAY SET-UP PERMIT TO THE WESTONKA SPORTS CENTER ASSOCIATION, INC. FOR AUGUST 6, 1982 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 157 July 27, 1982 FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST - COUNTY ROAD 110 PROJECT The City Manager explained that this is the final payment request for the County Road 110 Project and the total City share is $15,728.90. Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve the flnat."payment for the County Road 110 Project in the amount of $15,728.90. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - CABLE ~.V. FRANCHISE The City Manager explained that this proposed Request for Proposals (RFP) is the product of the Cable T.V. Committee.and their Consultant Tom Creighton. He briefly went over the highlights of the proposal'and the time schedule. The next step is to set up a community Public Hearing on the RFP. Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to set the date for ~he Community Public Hearing on the Request for'Proposals for August 17, 1982, at 7:30. P.M. in the Shirley Hills School Little Theater. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Lindlan moVed and Councilmember Swenson seconded a motion directing the City Manager to write a letter to the Cable T.V. Committee cOmmending them for the outstanding job they have done in'such a short period of time. The'vote.was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $282,410.82, when funds are available. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Proposal for Modification of Headwaters Control Structure Management Policy and Operating Procedures. B. Surface Water Management Act Seminar - August 6, 1982 - put on by the Association of Metropolitan Munlclpalities. C. Minnehaha Watershed District Agenda - July 15, 1982. D. Westonka Chamber - Waves - July, 1982. E. League of Minnesota Cities - 1982 Regional Meeting Schedule. COUNTY ROAD llO - REPAIR OF ROAD FROM 1979 WATERMAIN BREAK The City Manager explained that the County is requesting that the City repair a portion of County Road 110 near Oaklawn that was damaged during a watermain break in 1979. The road repair job is sagging and the County wants an overlay done on that section. He suggested that since we have Valley Paving in town doing some other overlays that we have them do it. 158 July 27, 1982 This overlay might need as much as 50 tons of a special mix priced at approximately $57.50/ton installed. He would like the Council's .authorization to do this repair work. Polston moved and'Charon seconded a motion authorizing theCity Manager to accept Valley'Paving's proposal to repair County Road llO'near Oaklawn but not to exceed 50 tons of special mix. The vote was. unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CHESTER PARK WALKWAY The City Manager explained to the Council that Bud Nolan has contacted him and would like to put in a bituminous walkway along side of Chester Park down to the beach from the road. The reason he would like to do this is because that area is gravel and keeps eroding away and 'is dangerous. Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion to allow Bud Nolan to contract to have a bituminous walkway put in along side of Chester Park ~o the beach Unden the Park Director's supervision and approval of all work to · be done, because it is in the interest ~f the public health, safety and welfare. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Charon moved and Swenson seconded a motion to adjourn at 9:05 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Jon Elam, City Manager Fran Clark, City Clerk BILLS ..... JULY 27, 1982 Air Comm .. 90.00 Autocon Industries 87.74 Amer Cast Iron Pipe 305.09 American Nat'l Bank 4,705.00 Bonhoff & Saliterman 2,000.00 Blackowiak & Son 94.00 Holly Bostrom 162.82 Burl ington Northern 533.33 F.H. Bathke Co 13.55 .Bowman Barnes 376.17 Janet Bertrand 13.86 C6mo Specialty 8.00 Community Services 35.00 Adeline Carr 100.00 Ha~ley Cederstrom 80.00 Community Radiology 7.50 Dunkley & Bennett 326.78 Driver & Vehicle Serv. 3.25 Joel Essig 2,20D.00 Ernst Assoc 2,000.00 First Bank Mpls 5,236.25 Flexible Pipe Tool 31.51 First Bank St. Paul 22,205.75 Flaherty Equip 233.52 Gopher Sign 226.40 Eugene Hickok 80.00 Hawkins Chemical 201.12 Holiday Inn 88.57 IIlles 42.00 Information Publishers 155.70 Indep School Dist 277 70.00 Robert Johnson 17.38 John Kotula 308.73 Lamperts 257.27 LOGIS 1,604.47 Long Lake Ford Tractor 7.49 Leighton Lindlan 62.92 M.J. Litfin & Son 260.00 Metro Waste Control 1,262.25 Mac-ln-Erny Inc 714.13 MacQueen Equip 12.55 C.S. McCrossan 1,844.33 McCombs Knutson 4,072.00 Metro Waste Control 19,277.27 Miller Davis Co. 6.80 Minnegasco 60.77 Mound Super Valu 70.81 Minnesota CLE 250.00 City of Mound 67.45 MN Recreation & Park 100.00 Minn Comm 28.50 Martins Navarre (~(~ 500.00 NSP 4,129.83 NW Nat'l Bank Mpls 185,778.25 NW Bell Tele 80.73 Northland Electric i39.86 Planning & Develop Serv 825.00 Popham, Haik 1,427.90 Pitney Bowes 26.00 Don Rother 45.10 State Treas 339.14 Nels Schernau 9.02 Satellite Industries 251.32 Serv A Dock 145.55 Stern, Levi ne, Schwar. tz 975.00 Sno Pros 140.00 Thrifty Snyder Drug 62.72 T imberwa 11 Landscap ing 64.80 U of MN Registrar 110.00 Westonka Sports 96.21 Worms Repair 200.00 Westonka Plumbing 33.50 Xerox 82.72 Griggs Cooper 3,361.41 Johnson Bros. 2,836.97 MN Distillers 1,132.90 Old Peoria 2,697.52 Ed Phillips 4,921.34 TOTAL BILLS 282,410.82 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Case. No. 82-127 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL TO VACATE A PORTION OF FIRE ACCESS - NORTH 10 FEET OF BEACHSIDE ROAD ABUTTING LOT 19, BLOCK 2, SHADYWOOD POINT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, August 3, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. at. the City Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, a public hearing will be .had of all persons interested ~n the pro- "posal to. vacate a portion of the fire access known as north "Beach- side Road" from Shorewood Lane to West. Arm Bay of Lake Minnetonka. The proposal is to vacate that portion of the north 10 feet of Beachside Road adjacent to Lot 19, Block 2, Shadywood Point not being, used for Lift Station or Utilities. ~ All persons appearing at said hearing will be given an opportunity to be heard. Francene C. Clark., City Clerk I rn' APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF MOUND Case 82-127 LEGAL DEscRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: PLAT PARCEL ng Residents and owners of property abutting the street to be vacated: Need to re~in Recommended by gtiliti~s: NSP /35~ ;st~negasco No n~d Continental Tel. No ~eed Need lift station site See ~mm~nd~d by Cit~: Public ~;orks ~ - Fire ChlefNO ~e~dEngineer~eCked - ] , dq. I Commissioo Minutes . Jensen moved and'Vargo Seconded a motion to recommend vacation of the requested ]0 feet of Beachside Lane based on the deed stating that when a structure is bu[]t on the s~te, the builders w~]] assume all government costs incurred iD constructing necessary gutters, sewers, etc. needed to properly drain the area's storm water and that existing structures be removed w~thin s~x months. The vote was: Stannard and Wetland voted aga;nst; Jensen, Vargo and Peterson voted ,'n ~vo~ ~d ~'~z~3~k, ~n~ ~n~on ~b~=~,~. ~o=,on =~,~. /F~ CITY of MOUND Case No. 82-127 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD :MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 {612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: J0n Elam, City Manager Jan Bertrand, Building Official July 12, 1982 1972 Shorewood Drive : 10 Foot Street Vacation of Fire Access I have been to 1972 Shorewood Lane with John Cameron and we have measured the City and Northern States Power. equipment distances. We will need to retain a l0 foot. by 35 foot section of the fire access as per the attached drawing. The lot size will be close to the lO,O00.square foot.requirement with the remaindeF of the vacation. The 1980'square footage assessment.against the property was for 9,800 square feet. A drainageway should be maintained along and across the lot. Jan Bertrand City Official JB/ms Attachment 0 m ~- 0 o ,~ Continental Telephone of Minnesota, Inc. South District P. O. Box 258 2365 Commerce Boulevord Mound, Minnesota 55364 (612) 472-8865 l~ C E IVFD JUl. 1 lg~2 June 30, 1982 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Attention of Ms. Marjorie Stutzman Subject: Vacation of Beachside Road Dear Ms. Stutzman: Continental Telephone Company of Minnesota, Inco, has no objection to the proposed vacation of the north 10 feet of North Beachside Road. We have no facilities located on this.portion of the right-of-way and do not see any future needs. Yours truly, Manager - District Engro RSB/mi s RECEIVED JUL 2 1982 July 1, 19 82 MS. Marjorie Stutsman Planning and Zoning Department City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Marjorie: A%tached is your sketch showing the proposed vacation of the north 10 feet of north Beachside Road abutting Lot 19, Block 2, Shadywood Point. The Minnesota Gas Company has no facilities within the above ~described area and hasno objection to its vacation° Thank you .for.the advance notice. Very truly yours, William R. Schram Administrator Real Estate WRS/lck Attachment k/linn~nt2 ~R.~ C, nmnanv 201 South Seventh Street. M~nneaDolis. Minnesota 55402 CITY of MOUND 5341 MA~YWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 June 25, i982 Northern States Power Company Minnegasco Continental Telephone Company McCombs Knutson Associates - City Engineer Public Works Department Police Chief ~/Fire Chief Re: Proposed vacation of north 10 feet of north Beachside'Road except for a smal. 1 area around the lift station. The City of Mound has had a request to vacate the north l0 feet of north Beachside.Road abutting Lot 19, Block 2, Shadywood Point. Do you foresee any need for this'street? Planning and Zoning Department --..-: ' ~/-.4 L"- .~ lu.tulJ, ed.(I §u!uoz pue §ujuueld L~Jls $!ql Joj p~U Aue ~s~Jo~ noA oo · 3u!od poo~/peqs '~ ~3olg *gt 309 6u!13nqe peoB ap!sqoe~g qlJou jo 3~J 0! 44Jou ~43 ~3eoe^' 03 3s~nbgd e pe4 se4 punoN jo A3!3 'uo!lels l~l[ ~q3 punoJe e~e t'le~s e Jo~ lda3x~ peo~ ~p!sq3e~g q~dou ~o 3~ 0t q3Jou ~o uo!3eoeA p~sododd ZBGt 'SZ ~unr J, cjgsg VJ. OCjDNNI~ 'aNnov~ -¥ol:l aOOMXYt~ t.~S ONSIOIAI 30 A LI ) July 13, 1982 Fran Clark City Clerk Meun~ Mne T~e ~repesed vacatien ef the Kert~ 10 ft ef ~ertb Be~ebsi~e Read te the abutting preperty ewner, Heinz Stefan ef 1972 Sher~wee~ Ln, will eliminate ene deck site fer use ef the public. We at the present time have three deck sites em Nerth Beaehsi~e Ln. 10' ef %)me sherelin~ will reduce eur deck sites te twe. Vacating Dea Rather Deck Insp. 1. 'Street Address of Property ~J~'~ 2.- Legal De'scripti.on of Property: CITY OF MOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Please type the following information) L .sl,'t. Fee Paid ~'7~'~/ ' Da te 'F i 1 ed Lot /~ 4- all o~ /~fxce~-t' .S~ Iz.s-" .lock I Addition Owner's Name ~J//~_.[j//~ l. PID No..ZUr//7 .t. Ur q l oo ~ Day Phone - 4. Applicant (if other than owner): Name Day Phone No. Address 5. Type of Request: Variance ( ) ConditiOnal Use Permit Zoning Interpretation & Review Wetland Permit ( ) P.U'.D. ( ) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other ~lf other, specify: resent Zoning District 7. Existing Use(s) of Prop'erty 8.' Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? ~O If so, list'date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. i certify that all'of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate, i consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the' purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Signature of Applicant _/~_~L~/J~~ Date / 3. Case No. 82-135 14 Foot Street Front VarJahce - 4862 Leslie Road Lot 14 and Part of Lot 15, BloCk 21, Wychwood Alleene L. Butterfield was present. The Building Inspector explained applicant is requesting an attached garage - 24 X 24j for two cars 6 feet from her front property line; garage would be setback from the existing'street curb line 28 feet at the shortest length as Leslie Road is curved away from her property. - Stannard moved and Vargo seconded a motion to recommend approval of the /~,~1 14 foot street front variance request as submitted recognizing the re- location of Leslie Ro~d away from her property. The vote was unanimously - in favor. · Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure (2) Case # 82-]35 D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be requi.red by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. Request for a Zonin9 Variance A. All information below, a site plan, as described In Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of the property'conform to ~1~1 use regulations for the zone district In which it is located? Yes If "no", specify each nOn-conforming use: Do the existing structures complywith all area, heigh~and bulk.regulations for the zone district In'which i't is.located? Yes (~x) No ( ) If "no" specify'each non-conforming use: D.. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the.uses.permitted in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow ( . ) (~0 Too. small bo. ct~.,.(a~ ( ) (' ) Too shallow ( ) / -- Topography ( ) Soil Drainage. ( ) Sub-surface Shape (~) 'Other: Specify: E. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after 'the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No C~ If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by'any ~&~r man-made change', such as the reloca- tion of a'road? Yes (~) No,-X, ~f yes, explain: ~r~s~,~ s~r~ff G. Are the conditions of hardship for'which:you re uest a va[i°,, ce peculiar 'only to the property described in this petition? Yes {)~) N0 ( ) If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? H..What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, Using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) I, Will grantingn~f ~ var,ance ~e mater,al~y detr,mental to'property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? CITY OF HOUND gound, ginne~ota Planning Commlssion Agenda of July 26, 1982: Board of Appeals .. Case No. 82-135 4862 Leslie Road Lot 14 and Part of. Lot 15,.Block 21, Wychwood Request 14 foot Variance Zoning District R-2 Applicant: Alleene L. Butterfield 4862 Leslie Road Phone: 472-6713 The applicant is requesting to place an attached 24 foot by 24 foot two car garage 6 foot from her front property line. The garage would be setback from the existing street curb line 28 feet at the shortest length. Leslie Road surface is curved away from the proposed driveway. Pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance for the R-2 Zone, the setback is required to be 20 feet for the principal structure. The lot area, bulk of str~cture, and setbacks existing on the site meet the zoning requirements. Recommend: I would recommend approving the request for the garage to be placed 6 feet from the front property line recogniz!ng the relocation of Leslie Road away from her property. The topography of the lot has an' elevation approximately 4.to 6 feet above Leslie Road. An alternate location would be a detached garage in the rear yard a minimum of 4 feet from the side property line and 5 feet from the house with approximetely a 70 foot driveway access. Jan Bertrand Building Official / JB/ms APPLICATION FOR SUB~I'VISION OF LAND .Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND 'FEE Case No. 82-136 FEE OWNER PLAT~ PARC~/ Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: · ZONING Wei]and moved and Stannard seconded a motion to r:ecommend approval preliminary lot-split subdivision upon the following conditions: e of. the The. encroachment of the concrete'slab at the garage not be Aemoved recognizing the proposed road to'the south will not be improved. The iron monuments be set in place with separate surveys to be sub- mitted for Parcel A and Parcel B. A new address be assigned to the Parcel B structure off of Montgomery Road for emergency and mailing efficiency. Extend 25 foot utilitY'easement, across both'Parcel A and Parc.) B as per City Engineer's des~'ription as follows: "An easement for utility purposes 'over, under add across the northeaster)y 25.00 feet of vacated Montgomery Place which lies between the extensions across it of the' Southeasterly li'ne of Lot 4, Block ~ and the NOrthwesterly line of Lot 8~ said Block 9, all in Avalon according to the recorded'plat'thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota." Any additional street unit charges be paid or assessed in the amount of et $1,170.90. All property owners with.financial interest sign approval of the divi- sion' of the .property. Install a dead end sign at Montgomery Place. That failure on the part of the petitioner to submit a final plat of the lot split, per Section 22.13 within one year from the date of this approval, shall deem the preliminary approval to be null and void, unless an extension of time is applied for and approved. The vote on the motion~w~a~,~ujanimously in f~vor. Applicant'sinterestintheproperty: ~_~ac'~oq~~~/~' DATE This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE Case No. 82-136 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission Agenda of July 26, 1982: Board of Appeals Applicant: Case No. 82-136 James A. Evenson Lots 15-22, Block 10, Avalon and all of 2879 Tuxedo Boulevard -vacated Montgomery Road Phone: 472-2150 PID 19-117-23 31 0032 Request: Lot-Split Subdivision Preliminary Zoning District: R-1 The applicant is requesting a split of the existi.ng Lots 15-22 to allow for the creation of two parcels of land with existing structures on both sites. Both new parcels exceed the 10,000 square foot lot area requirement for the R-l Zoning District. However, Parcel A's present structure fronting on Tuxedo Boulevard is undersized (724 sq. ft.; required is 840 sq. ft.). The existing garage is 2.1 feet from the south (Brunswick Road) property line with the present concrete slab next to the garage encroaching unto the Brunswick Road and Tuxedo Boulevard'right-of-ways. The present house structure is at the public right-of-way llne of Tuxedo Boulevard. The setback requirement for the garage is. 30 feet from Brunswick and Tuxedo Boule- vard. The front yard setback for the house is required to be 30 feet from Tuxedo Boulevard. Parcel B's lot width required for the R-1 Zoning District is 60 feet. The proposed' Parcel B has double frontage(to the south--Brunswick, to the north--Montgomery R°ad). The frontage on Montgomery Road is 65.7 feet and the f~ontage at Brunswick is 50 feet. The setbacks of the structure and the size ~f the structure are conforming with zoning requirements. RECOMMEND: A motion to approve the preliminary lot-split subdivision upon the con- dition that: 1. The encroachment of the concrete slab at the garage not be removed recognizing the proposed road to' the south will not be improved. 2. The iron monuments beset in place with 'separate surveys to be submitted for Parcel A and Parcel B, 3. A new address be assigned to the Parcel B structure off of Mont- gomery Road for emergency and mailing efficiency. 4. Extend 20 foot utility easement across Parcel A.and Parcel B (Minimum) 5. Any additional street unit charges be paid or assessed in the amount of $1,170.90. ~?~'/~ 6. All property owners with ~inancial interest sign approval of division of the property. 7. Install a dead end sign at Montgomery Place. 8. That failure on the part of the petitioner to submit a final plat of the lot split per Section 22.13 within one year from the date of this approval shall deem the preliminary approval to be null and ~oid, unless an extension of time is applied for and approved. This will be going to the Council August 3, ]982 ~an~Ber t rand Building Official Case No. 82-136 Sketch ['oz' ,Tames A. EYenson of Lots 15-22, ~loek 10, Avalon Hennepin County, Minnesota A. Thmt part of the followinj-described property: Lots 15 through 22-inc!usive, Block 10; and all of vacated Montgomery Place lying between the extensions across it of the Southeasterly line of Lot 4, i~loek $;, and the North~esterly line of Lot 8, said ~loek 9, all in'~valon", lying Easterly o~ a llne described as follows: Co~,encing at the Southwest eo~er of s'~id ~t 15; thence ~st along the South lin~ of said Lots 15 and 16 a di~t~rme of 53 .F~et to thc ooint o~ beginning of the line being de~mrib~d; thence deflectiu~ left " .. "~-+~ .... said vacated Montgcme~ Place, t~nd 'theru enuing, ~7°18' to t]~:~ ,~r,n~s%~.rly line of B. Lots 15 through 22 inclusive, Block 10; and ~!1 of vacated Mont~omer7 Place lying: between the extensicns across it of thc Southeasterly line of Lot ~, Block 9, and the Northwesterly line of Lot-g, s.~id Block 9, all in "Avalon", EXCE~ that ~rt thereof lying Easterly of s lir. e described as Follows: Co~m~eneing at the Southwest corner of said Lot 15; thence East along the South linc of said Lots 15 and 16 u distance cf 50 'fe~:t to tho :~int of beginning of tho l~ne beiug described; thru%ce deflecting !~ft 67°18' to th~. North~asterly line of said vacated Montcon.c~y Plane, and there eating. Scale: I".: 40' rote : j'6-30-82 Gordon R. Coffin C(~. Land Surveyor~. Los! Lake, k:nr.e..ota UJ Z CITY OF MOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Please type the following information) 1. 'Street Address of Property. ~)~! 2. Legal Description of Property: Lot Oat· Filed Addition Section Fourteen 3. Owner's Name 4. Applicant (if other than owner): Name ~.w. ~ ~ ~'C ~ l~l~ Part of that Part of S. 200 f.t..o'f NE¼ of SE¼ lying E of N]y ext of W linc of ~ot 17 Block Lynwold Park PID No.1'4-117-24 41 0057 Day Phone No. z/~_~.,~.~..-/j Address ~-5/~. Type of Request: (.) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( ) Amendment (-~ Sign Permit ( )*Other *If other, specify: Present Zoning District B-] Existing Use(s) of Property 8.. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property?drub&p~l~/ if so, list date(silo ~O~"-°f ~ list date(s) of application, action taken a'n rovide Resolution No.(s) - ~ Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. ! certify that all'of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate· I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the' purpose oF inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Signature of Applicant '~<~,~.~ (~..~-~ Date ~/~,/~'Z~ Case No. 82-137 Sign Permit for the Harold J. Pond Sports. Center, 2121 Commerce Part of S. 200 ft. of NE¼ of SE¼ lying E of Nly ext. of W line of Lot 17, Lynwold Park J~rry Kohls, Manager of the Sports'Center, was present. Request is for a l0 foot wide sign mounted on the East wall of building in upper left corner with top of sign .approximately 18 feet above the ground. Letters will be in two lines; 1st line 12" high and 2nd line 8" high. Sign will identify the building as the "Harold J. Pond Sports Center". Weiland moved and Vargo seconded a motion to recommend accepting the sign as requested and waive the fee ~for the sign permit. The vote was unanimously in favor. Case No. 82-137 CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 July '30, 1982 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER RE: WETLANDS ORDINANCE Enclosed is the revised and amended Wetlands Ordinance. It has been approved by the Wetlands Committee and is ready for final adoption. This is a continued item from June 22nd. JE:fc ORDINANCE NO. AN.ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING WETLAND AREAS AND REGULATIONS AND PROVISION FOR FEES The City of Mound does ordain: The following additions are made to the Zoning Code of the City and shall read as follows: Section 23.1100. Wetlands - Purpose and Definition. 'The City Council of Mound finds that there are wetlands within the City which, as part of the ecosystem, are critical to the health, safety and welfare of the land, animals and people within the .City. Definition for wetlands, "Areas with water standing Within 18 inches below, at or above the soil.surface for significant portions of most years, with soils identified on soil maps' and reports as organic, alluvial, marsh, muck, peat, water or very poorly.drained, or wi.th aquatic or semi-aquatic vegetation dominant". These wetlands, if.preserved and maintained, constitute impoFtant physical, aesthetic, recreational and economic assets' for existing and future residents of the CitY. Therefore,'the purposes of this district are:' 1. To provide for the'protection, preservation, proper maintenance and Use of specified wetlands. 2. To minimize the dl. sturbance to them as.to present damage from ~excessive sedimentation, eutrophication or pollution. 3. To prevent loss of'fish and other aquatic organisms, wildlife and vegetation and the habitats of the same. 4. To provide for.the protection of the City's fresh water supplies from the dangers of drought, overdraft, pollution or mismanagement. 5. To reduce the financial burdens imposed upon the community through rescue and relief efforts occasioned by the occupancy or use of areas subject to periodic flooding and p~event loss of life, property damage and-the loses and risks associated with flood conditions.. 6. To preserve the location, character and extent of natural drainage courses. Section 23.1105. 'Authority~ Pursuant to MinnesOta Statutes, Sections 462.357, 459.20. 378.31, Subd. ll, and Chapter 105, the City of Mound does adopt district boundaries.and a' map. showing 'said wetland boundaries;:.a~d regulations and controls for all designated wetlands within the City. Section 23.110. Wetlands Boundaries.- The wetlands as hereinafter defined shall apply to wetland areas which are specifically delineated on the Official Wetlands Map of the Ci:tY of Mound which is attach'ed hereto- and adopted as a part of this ordinance. For the purposes of determining the application of this wetlands ordinance to any particular parcel of land or water the above referenced map shall be on file in the office of the City Manager and shall be available for inspection and copying.. Section 23.1115. Wetland Permit. Except as hereinafter provided in this ordinance, no person shall perform any development in a wetland without first having obtained'a wetland permit (hereinafter referred to as "Permit") from the City of Mound. Development shall include the construction, installation or alteration of any structure; the clearing or altering of vegetation or land and the division of land into two or more parc'els. Section 23.1120. Exceptions. The Permit requirement established by this ordinance shall not apply to:. Ae Emergency work necessary to preserve life or property. When emergency work is performed under this section the person performing it shall report the pertinent facts relating to the work to the City Manager prior to the commencement of work. The City Manager shal! review the fac.ts and determine whether an emergency exists and shall, by written memorandum, authorize the commencement of the emergency exception. A person commencing emergency work shall, within ten days following the commencement of that activity, apply for the issuance of a Permit. The issuance thereof, may require the permlttee to perform such work as is determined to be reasonably necessary to correct any impairment to the wetland occasioned by .such work. B. The repair or maintenance .of any lawful, use of ·land existing on the date of adoption of this ordinance. " Section 23.1125. Application for Processing of P~rmit. A. 'A separate application for a Permit shall be made to the City of Mound for each development activity for which a Permit is required.' Only one application need be made for two or more such acts which are to be done simultaneously on the same parcel. The application shall include a map of the site, a plan of the · proposed development and the estimated cost'of development. Other engineering data·such ~ surveys and other descriptive infoY~ation are als~ required. In order to determine the effects of such development of the wetland the City Council may require additional information including but not limited to the following: 1. A specific description of the type,, amount and location of the development. 2. A description of the ecological characteristics of the wetland. 3. A conservation plan describing actions to be taken to mitigate any detrimental effects of development. 4. Maps and data on soils, water table and flood capacity of the wetland. When the proposed development includes the construction or alterations of a structure, two sets of plans thereof shall be -submitted with the application. The permit application shall be processed according to the procedures specified in Section 23.505 of the Zoning Ordinance which pertains to processing of conditional use permits. The Permit may be processed at the same time and in connection with the processing of an application for a building permit or any other permit required by ordinance of the City of Mound. Section 23.1130. Permit Standards. No permit shall be issued unless the City of Mound finds and determines that the proposed development complies with the following standards: Filling. A minimum amount of filling may be allowed when necessary but in no case shall the following restrlctiO~s on total amount of filling be exceeded. Since the total amount of filling which can be permitted is limited, the City, when considering Permit applications, shall consider the equal apportionment of fill opportunity, to riparian land owners. 1. Total filling shall.not cause the total natural' flood storage capacity of the wetland to fall below the projected volume of runoff from the whole developed wetland watershed generated by a six (6) inch rainfall in twenty-four (24) hours. 2. Only fill free of chemical pollutants and organic wastes may be used. 3. Wetlands'shall not be used for solid waste disposal. Or~dgi,n~. Dredgi. ng may .be allowed only when a boat channel is ..required for access to a navigable lake, for a marina or when it will not have a substantial or significantly adverse effeCt upon · the ecological and hydrological characteristics of the wetland. Dredging, when allowed, .shall be limited as follows': 1. I't shall be located so as to maximize the acti'vity in the areas of lowest Vegetation density. .2. It shall not significantly change the water flow characteristics. 3. The size of the dredged area shall be limited to the absolute minimum. 4. Disposal of the dredged'material shall not result in a significant.change .in the current-flow, or in a substantial ~structlon of.~egetation, fish spawning areas or water pollution. 5. Work.in the wetland will.not be performed during the breeding season of water fowl or fish spawning season. 6. Only one boat channel or marina shall be allowed per large- scale development. 7. In other residential .developments, dredging shall be located so as to .provide for the use of boat channels and marinas by two or more adjacent property owners. 8. The width of the boat channel to be dredged shall be no more than the minimum required for the safe operation of boats at minimum operating speed. C. Discharges. 1. No.part of any sewage disposal system, requiring on-land or in-ground disposal of waste shall be located closer than 150 feet from the normal high water mark unless it is proven by the applicant that no effluent will immediately or gradually reach the wetland because of existing characteristics of the site or system. 2. Organic waste which would normally be disposed of at a solid waste disposal site or which would normally be discharged into a sewage disposal system or sewer shall not be directly or indirectly discharged to the wetland. 3. Stormwater runoff from construction sites may be directed to the wetland only when substantially free of silt, debris and chemical pollutants and only at rates which will not disturb vegetation or increase turbidity, D. Building constraints. 1. The lowest floor level or basement elevation shall be.at 'least three feet above the seasonal high w~ter level of the wetland. 2. Development which will result in unusual road maintenance costs or,utillty llne breakages due to soll limltatlons, including high frost action shall not be permitted. E. Vegetati.on. No wetland vegetation may be removed or altered except that reasonable required for the placement of structures and use of property. Section 23.1135. Conditions. A Permit maY be approved subject to compliance with reasonable .conditions which are specifically set forth in the Permit 'and .are necessary to .insure compliance with the requirements contained in this district. Such conditions may include but arenot limited to the following: 1. Limitation'of the size, kind or character of the proposed work. 2. Require. the construction of other structures. 3. Require replacement of vegetation. 4. Establish required monitoring procedures and maintenance activity. 5. Stage the work over time. 6. Require the alteration of the site design'to .ensure buffering. 7. Require the provision of a performance bond. 8. Require the conveyance to the City of Mound Or another public entity of certain lands or interest therein. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zoning district(s) may be modified in furtherance of the purpose of this ordinance by express condition contained in the Permit. Section 23.1140. Time of Permit. Apermittee shall begin the work authorized by the Permit within sixty (60) days from the date of issuance of the Permit unless a different.date for the commencement of work is set forth in the Permit. The' permittee shall complete the work authorized by the Permit within the time limits, specified in the Permit which in no event shall exceed more than twelve (12) months from the date of issuance.. The permittee shall notify the Building Official at least twenty-four. (24) hours prior to commencement of work. Should the work not be commenced as specified herein, the Permit shall become void. Extensions. If, prior to the date established for commencement of work, the permittee makes written request to the City Manager or his disignated agent for an extension of time to commence the work, setting forth the reasons for the required extension, the administrator may grant such extension. Renewals. A permit which has become void may be renewed at the discretion of the City Council upon payment of a renewal fee. If the City Council does not grant such renewal a Permit for such work may be granted only upon compliance with the procedures herein established for an original app'licatlon. Notice of completion. A permittee shall notify the City Manager or his designated agent in writing when he has finished the work. No work shall be deemed to have been completed until approved in writing by the City'Manager or his'designated agent following such w~itten notification. De Inspection..The City may require inspections of the work to be made periodical.ly during the course thereof by a member of the City of Mound staff and shall cause a final inspection to be' made following the completion of the work. The permittee shall assist.the administrator in making such inspections. Section 23.1145. Responsibilityl Effect. Responsibility. Neither the issuance of a Permit nor compliance with the condi'tions'thereof, nor compliance with the provisions °f this ordinance, shall relieve any persons from any responsibility otherwise imposed by law for damage to persons or property. The issuance of any permit hereunder shall not serve to impose any liability on the City of Mound or its officers'or employees for injury or damage to persons or property. A Permit issued .pursuant to this'ordinance shall not relieve the permlttee of the responsibility of complying with any other requirements established by law, regulation or ordinance. Special assessment. The land within a designated wetlands distric~ ,area for which a development or other restrictive easement is conveyed to the City shall not be subject to special assessments levied by the City to pay the costs or public water, sewer, curb, gutter or other public municipal improvements'for which such assessments are authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. Variance. The City Council may~authorize in specific cases foil.owing, appeal and hearing a variance from the provisions of this ordinance where the literal application of the ordinance would result in substantial inequitable hardship to an applicant property owner~ tn assessing hardship the City Council shall balance the severity of the physical, social and economic effects of the literal application against the interests of the City in effecting the purposes of this ordinance as expressed above. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute a hardship if a. reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. No variance may be granted which would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is.located. A variance shall be granted in writing accompanied by specific findings of fact as to the necessity for the grant of the variance and its specific provisions. A variance request shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.506 of the Mound City Zoning Ordinance. Section 23.1150. Fees. The City Council may establish by resolution fees for rezonings, variances, permits, condltione~use permits, special permits or requiring administrative time or public expenditures under any section of the zoning ordinance. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Adopted by the City Council Published in Official Newspaper McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.' CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 July 28, 1~82 Hr. Gerry Brown Aero Asphalt'Inc. P. O. Box 217 Hamel, HN 55340 Subject: City of Hound 1982 Street Overlay Project Change Order ~1 File #6468 Dear Gerry: Enclosed are three copies of Change Order #1 for paving the small parking lot at Hound Bay Rark in Hound. Rlease sign and return all three to this office. you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, NcCOHBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron $C/jb Enclosures cc: ~on Elam Hound City Hanager Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Eagan printed on recycled paper CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Mound, Minnesota 1982 Street Overlay Project File #6468 MOUND BAY-PARK - PARKING LOT ITEM " Grading and Add. Class 2 Bit° Wear Course (Mn/DOT 2341) 8' Precast Concrete Parking Curbs - Furnished & Installed Total, Change Order No. 1 QUANTITY 150 TONS 36 EACH UNIT PRICE LUMP SUM $23.50/TN $18.50/EA TOTAL 500.00 3,525.00 666.00 $ 4,691.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 25,885.50 4,691.00 $ 30,576.50 APPROVED: BY:. AERO ASPHALT Date: APPROVED: BY: McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: APPROVED: By: CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA Date: City Manager By: Mayor Date: INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Jon Elam, City Manager Chief Bruce Wold Parking - Edgewater Drive DATE July 23, The resident at 4917 Edgewater called Fran to complain of the parking on Edgewater. The problem stems from the. blockage of mailboxes by parked cars '(eg. Lakewood-Lane). He is requesting that no parking signs be moved to the same'side.of the street as.the mailboxes. I drove down Edgewater today, and can See no reason why the signs can't be moved. I observed four mailboxesblocked by parked cars. A review of ordinance-46.29.'sub..(b). (1) presents a further problem. The ordinance calls 'for no parking on both sides of the roadway. Currently the street is zoned.to permit parking'on the east side. With cars parked on.one.side, adequate space exists to allow normal traffic flbw and emergency vehicle use. Reconmendation: If the council agrees that moving the no parking signs to the same side of the street as the mailboxes is a good idea, ammend the ordinance to read: '~est side of Edgewater Drive from FairvieWLane to Northern Rd.., July 30, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Enclosed is a memo from Curt on his interpretation of the State Statutes and the City Ordinances regarding Set-Up Licenses. Basically, again property, taxes must be paid before the Council can approve the Set-Up License. There does not appear to be similar requirements as they relate to 3.2 Beer. In that case, a Public Hearing has ~e be held and the License can then be issued. In both of'these cases, the Surfside has applied and we have the application ready for processing. JE:fc A.THONAS WURST GERALD T. CARROLL CURTIS A. PEARSON THO~4AS F. UNDERWOOD ALBERT FAULCONER 11~ JANES D. LARSON LAW OFFICES WURST, CARROLL & PEARSON I)OO FIRST BANK PLACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5S40::~ July 29, 1982 TELEPHONE (6IZ) 338-8gll Mr. Jon Elam City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Surfside Set-Up, 3.2 Applications Dear Jon: Thi~ will confirm numerous conversations between your office and my office today. It is my understanding that the Surfside has now filed two applications~, one for a set-up license and the other for a 3.2 non-intoxicating malt liquor license. This will confirm what I have indicated to you on the phone which is as follows. The set-up license is controlled by Minnesota Statutes Sections340.119, 340.12 and 340.13. The specific authority for set-up licenses is found in Subdivision 3 of Section 340.119 which allows for set-ups. In that case a permit has to be issued by the Commissioner of Public Safety and it appears that the same provisions that relate to the intoxicating liquor license under 340.12 would apply to a set-up license, but that could be debated. Our city code governs club licenses which is the incorporation of set-up licenses in Section 31.10 through 31.30. Section 31.14, Subd. e reads as follows: "No license shall be granted for oper.ation on any premises upon which taxes or assessments or other financial claims of the Village are delinquent or unpaid." It is therefore my opinion that a set-up license would be §overned by these provisions and the application is not in order because of the delinquent taxes. As to the 3.2 beer license, that is governed by Chapter 32 of the city code and a review of that does not indicate any specific word- ing relating to taxes or fees. I have also checked the state statute and I find nothing in the state statute which makes refer- ence to taxes or fees. WURST. CArrOll & PEarSoN Mr. Jon Elam Page 2 July 29, 1982 It is therefore my opinion that if all of the provisions of Chapter 32 of the city code have been met, and I specifically indicate to you that this is a administrative function to be checked at City Hall, then and in that case the Surfside could be considered for a 3.2 beer license. Very truly yours/-) Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney CAP:ms July 30, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Enclosed are two property tax statements, a map and a copy of our policy regarding lot combinations under Special Assessment procedures. The Erdman's wish to present their case to the Council. The~ feel they should have one unit charge eliminated because they own both lots and they' abut each other. Our policy stated that non-conforming, undersized lots could be combined if applied for before the Assessment Hearing. In this case, the lots are each over 10,000 square feet and the application was not even received until now. I told them they didn't qualify and by the fact that they wish to appear before the Council lets you know they didn't appreciate me telling them that. Now, I guess it's your turn. JE:fc THIS-STUB MUST ACCOMPANY SECOND HALF PAYMENT. O ND HALF -I !: Z. PAY STUB .982 ~( :)E LOAN NUMBER WESTEDGE BLVD =ay lo Hennepin County on or before October 31, 1982 to avoid Please read back of form for payment procedure. MUNIC MTGE CODE 85 B L V D PROPERT~ ADDRESS MN 55364 2612 TAXPAYER OR AGENT GARY J ERDMAN ;)606 t~ESTEDGE MOUND 24117232400030000000000000718372/*117232400031 DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION HENNEPIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 Office Hours o 8 to 5 · Monday - Friday Phone 348-3011 OWNER OR ASSESSED NAME ROBT 0 UHLTN ETAL AGENT J 'ERDMAN 2606 WESTEDGE BLVD MOUND I, IN 5536/, 1. AMOUNT TO ENTER ON FORM M-1PR, LINE 11 STATE PAID CREDITS WHICH REDUCE YOUR TAX: SCHOOL AGRICULTURAL CREDIT 2. HOMESTEAD CREDIT TOTAL CREDITS (TO LINE 9) 3. AMOUNT TO ENTER ON FORM M.1PR~ LINE 1, SCHEDULE 3 DELINQUENT TAX If this box is checked, you owe delinquent taxes and may not apply for the Property Tax Refunds until those taxes are paid, or until you enter into · confession of judgment to pa), those taxes. VA/NFORMATION: Mar~l~value of new improvements Total market value of parcel Total assessed value of parcel 23,800 6,664 PLEASE READ BACK OF STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX _ PAYABLE IN 1982 TAXPAYER'S COPY PRO PER~,J DENT~ F~ATION N? ~,~j SCHOOL WATER :'~--MUNIC DISTRICT SHED ;~23 '~11 ~7:= 2/, '.~ ~ ~:,, 0003!i~ 85 277 3 ADDITION UNPLATTED 23 117 24 .39 LOT BLOCK ACRES COM ON W LINE OF LOT 3 AT A PO ~PROPER~ ADDRESS 2612 WESTEDGE BLVD MTGE CODE LOAN NO. This properly description may not be a full legal description, use only for tax purposes, 4. COUNTY I 94.47 5. CITY 124.81 325.53 6. SCHOOL DISTRICT 7. OTHER TAXING DISTRICTS ;) 9. 67 8. TAX BEFORE CREDITS 9. LESS CREDITS WHICH REDUCE YOUR TAX 10. TAX AFTER CREDITS 11. ADD SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: PRINCIPAL INTEREST 674.48 674.4,8 320.68 441 .58 ~2.1982 TAX :'- ~ 1.436';7/+' PAYABLE One half of this tax is due May 31,.1982. Second half is due October 31, 1982. (Tax of $10 or less must be paid by May 31, 1982.) FORM FOR PENALTY AND PAYMENT INFORMATION THIS STUB MUST ACCOMPANY SECOND HALF PAYMENT. Pay to Hennepin County on or before October 31, 1982 to avoid m~ ND HALF penalty. Please read back of form for payment procedure, t.. PAY STUB 1982 TAXPAYERORAGENT MUNIC MTGECODE LOANNUMBER GARY J ERDMAN 85 2606 WESTEDGE BLVD ,.O,ERWAODRESS MOUND MN. 55364 2606 WESTEDGE BLVD PROPERTY. II; HOMESTEAD I SECOND HALF-TAX 241172324000200000000000'008753624117232400024 DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION HENNEPIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 Office Hours · 8 to 5 · Monday · Friday Phone 348-3011 STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX PAYABLE IN 1982 TAXPAYER'S COPY :. . OWNER OR ASSESSED NAME ROBT 0 UHLTN ETAL TAXPAYER OR AGENT GARY J ERDMAN 2606 WESTEDGE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 1. AMOUNT TO ENTER ON FORM M-1PR, LINE 11 STATE' PAID CREDITS WHICH REDUCE YOUR TAX: SCHOOL AGRICULTURAL CREDIT 2. HOMESTEAD CREDIT 1 , 645 . 83 TOTAL CREDITS (TO LINE 9) 3. AMOUNT TO ENTER ON FORM M-1PR~ LINE 1~ SCHEDULE 3 650.00 DELINQUENT TAX 650.00 1,721.46 If this box is checked, you owe delinquent taxes and may not apply for the PropeM¥ Tax Refunds until those taxes are paid, Or until you enter into a confession of judgment to pay those taxes. VALUE INFORMATION: Market value of new improvements Total market value of parcel Total assessed value of parcel MUNIC 85 ADDITION UNPLATTED Z3 117 24 LOT BLOCK ACRES ,,, 3 6 COM ON W LINE OF LOT 3 DIS 77 PROI:;ERTY ADDRESS 2606 WESTEDGE BLVD MTGE CODE LOAN NO. This properly description may not be a full legal description, use only for tax purposes. ITEMIZED STATEMENT: SCHOOL WATER DISTRICT SHED 277 3 4. COUNTY 496.34 5. CiTY 318.55 6. SCHOOL DISTRICT 830.84 7. OTHER TAXING DISTRICTS 7.~. 7 ~ 1,721.45 650.00 I ,071.45 267.72 411 .55 8. TAX BEFORE CREDITS 9. LESS CREDITS WHICH REDUCE YOUR TAX 10. TAX AFTER CREDITS 11. ADD SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: PRINCIPAL INTEREST 78,100 17,008 1,750.72 One half of this tax is due May 31,.1982. Second half is due October 31, 1982. (Tax of $10 or less must be paid by May 31, 1982.) ~- 1982 TAX PAYABLE PLEASE READ BACK OF FORM FOR PENALTY AND PAYMENT INFORMATION o C 140. ?~. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 Dear Bound Property Owner: The enclosed official notice is intended to advise you of a Special Assess- meat Bearing to be conducted by the City Council of Mound at 7:00 p.m. on Sep- tember 30, 1981, in the Little Theater at Shirley Rills School, 2450'Wilshire Boulevard. The notice relates to specific improvement projects, 1980 Street Improvements and M.S.A. Streets (Tuxedo Boulevard and Three Points Boulevard), previously authorized by the City Council, which has been or is in the process of being completed. Minnesota Statutory requirements provide that this assessment hearing be held prior to certifying and levying the final improvement assessment costs to the Hennepi~ County Finance Department. The assessment will be collected over succeeding years by the Hennepln County Treasurer's Office along with the real estate taxes. The purpose of the bearing is to advise the affected property owners of the final improvement costs to be assessed and the methods of apportionment and payment to be used. IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE QUALITY OR EXTENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORK UNDER THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT(S) RELATING TO YOUR PROPERTY, PLEASE CALL JON ELAM, CITY MANAGER,'AT 472-1155 BETWEEN 8:00 A.M. AND 5:00 P.M. OR COME TO THE CITY OFFICE AT 5341MAYWOOD ROAD. IF YOU CAN, PLEASE CONTACT US PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE (SEPTEMBER 30, 1981). The proposed assessment cost wa~ computed using $1,828.15 per unit, $11.70 per front foot, and $0.1017 per square foot. The following is the breakdown and total proposed assessment for your individual property. The final assessment.amounts will be computed based upon the formula and bene- fits as ordered by the City Council at the assessment hearing. Usually, the final amounts are the same as the proposed amounts. Some further information for your reference, regard{nE the proposed special assessments, is given as follows: 1. Minnesota Statutory requirements regulate the special assessment pro- cedures to be used (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429). 2. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minne- sota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk Treasurer of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service /~g/upon the Mayor or City Clerk Treasurer. 3. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment pertaining to a spec- ific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has either filed a signed ' written objection to that assessment with the City Clerk Treasurer prior to the public hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding officer at the public hearing. 4. Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll. Payments can be made at Mound City Hall. If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00 increments. If the total assessment is less than $300.00, no partial payment can be accepted. ~ 5. If the assessment is paid more than 30 days after Council action but on or before November 15, 1981, interest will be charged to December 31, 1981. 6. If the assessment is not paid on or before November 15, 198f, the a- mount will be spread over the assessment period. The first year payment will include interest for fifteen (15) months (October through December of 1981 and all of 1982). Following ~ears will have interest computed for 12 months. Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. 7. During each subsequent year, payment of the remaining balance may be made and must be paid on or before November 15 to have special assessments re- moved from the following year's tax statements. Partial payments are not allowed. 8. The assessment will be spread for 15 years at the current interest rate of eight and two tenths percent (8.2%) per year on the remaining principal. 9. The City of Mound does have a deferred assessment policy based ~n hardship for Senior citizens 65 years or older who have an income of less than $10,001 and who reside on and own homestead property. Information on this pro- gram can be secured at the City Offices prior to the public hearing. 10. The City has also previously participated in the Hennepin County Grant Program for Special Assessments. Information on this program can be secured at the City Offices prior to the public hearing. 11. If you have two or more adjacent Don-conforming lots which are listed as separate parcels on your tax statement, you may have been assessed one unit charge for each parcel. By combining these into one conforming parcel, one of the unit charges could possibly be removed. Please check with the City Office prior to the public hearing on September 30. ] Again, if you have any questions or comments, please contact us prior to the assessment hearing if possible. We sincerely appreciate your cooperation. CITY OF MOUND By CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 30, 1982 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER I've thought long and hard about whethe'r I should request being able to attend the National League of Cities Meeting in Los Angeles.' I have purposely not gone to any City Manager Conferences in either 1981 or 1982, but this is the best conference there is and my plan is that, if the Budget allows, I would li'ke to go. I will carefully ~ontior the finances on this and hold off making my final decision until the November, 1982, financial report is complete. But there are certain benefits to registering early that I though I could take advantage of. JE:fc league of minnesota cities June 30, 1982 TO: FROM: SUBJ: Mayors, Council, Managers and Clerks Darlyne M. Lang, Office Manager National League of Cities, Congress of Cities November 27 -December 1, 1982, Los Angeles, California Enclosed is a registration form for the National League of Cities annual Congress of Cities Conference. The form includes both conference and hotel registration information along with the program in brief. Additional forms are available through the League office. Air travel arrangements have been made with Shirley Kienholz of Greyhound Travel Club. Shirley can accommodate your individual travel needs with a variety of fares from Group at $359 and $369; Super Saver at $349; and Night Q Class at $300-- all of which allow considerable flexibility in scheduling. By far the most economical is the contract bulk fare she has available at $229 and $249. (Price subject to change by the airlines.) $229 fare--must leave on a Saturday and return on a Saturday. $249 fare--may leave and return anytime; may fly into Los Angeles and return from San Francisco on Northwest Airlines or return from San Diego on Republic Airlines, if you wish. Regulations for both fares--must travel round-trip on the same airlines; can't use a credit card; must make $50 deposit within 5 days after reservations are made; balance to be paid 50 days prior to departure; cancellation up to 45 days prior to scheduled departure requires no cancellation fee; after 45 days prior to departure the cancellation fee is $25; change of flight or departure date in going portion will result in a $25 handling fee; there will be no charge for return change if made more than 2 days prior to original departure. NOTE: THESE ARE SUBJECT TO SPACE AVAILABILITY. RESERVE EARLY ........... Post Conference tours or arrangements can also be made through Shirley Kienholz. Checks should be made payable to Greyhound Travel Club and mailed to: Ms. Shirley Kienholz (Telephone 612-881-7115) Greyhound Travel Club 9601 Garfield Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 OVER 183 univemsity avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-5600 As 'the Minnesota League will not have a sleeping room.block this year, you're encouraged to reserve early in order to get the hotel of your preference. You might note that the League's Breakfast and Hospitality Suite will be at the Hilton, as wil'l, rooms for the Board of Directors and League staff. A map on the re§istratio'n form indicates the proximity of all hotels to the convention center. The fol.lowing flights ar~ available for the~$2~fares: November 26, 27, 28- Depart Minneapolis/St. Paul Airline Flight # Departure Time Arrival Time Type Northwest #21 ll:O0 a.m. 12:30 p.m. Republic #301 9:15 a.m. 10:45 a.m. Republic" #305 5i40 p.m. 7:10 pJm. 747, lunch, non-stop ~reakfast, non-Stop dinner, non-stop December l, 2, 3, 4 -' D~part Los Angeles Northwest #16 6: 05 p.m. ll:17 p.m.~ dinner, non-stop Republic #300 8:45 a.m. 2:00 p.m. breakfast, non-stop Republic #304 ll:30 a.m. 4:45 p.m. lunch, non-stop posais ~at would sh~ power a.nd respo~lsibili~ from the fed- of the public~ businessland t~e ptd:diC's welfare--~o pr~ vete hands. Changes so dra.enatlc should not be ma~e w~out a great bate. and 0~at d~bam ~ at the 198Z Congress of Cities, ~ GREAT DEBATE This debate will range over philosophies as well as poticies and programs. It will consider whaler government programs truly reflect national goals anci national msponsibaities. It will consider ~e responsibilities appml~am to each level of gov- emmenL how ~ can be met and whether any level of gov- private sector can play. and should p~ay. in meeting t~e needs of the pub~. It will consicler the righ~ of peop~ and of the cities they live in. no matter how responsibi~ies are assk~ned. This clei~ate will raise questiont cenaini-/, but more impor- tant ~ ~ provide answers that will be essentia~ to yo~ to your city. and to ~e people liwng in i~ PRO ol~q~M X-HGItLIG~TS Because t. his debate is important to every Ame~can city. i~ wi~ be a central part of ~is year's Congress of Ckie~ Cities will have &t its heart five special events in which t~e changes that are in t~e air wiU be brought down ~o earth for ciose examination. Four of these special eye.ts will be deba..es be~veen promi- nent national F~jures ho~ Ol:qx~ng views on key issues a~ecttng the rela~onships among O~e thre~ levels of go~em- n~nc~ sysmm, which gn~ners mvenu~ for tim federal eminent, cnrri~ out rm~maJ policies and conmols O~ nc- dvides of indlvicluaJs, busines~s, organ~ations and govern- ment bodiet The spm~im at this symposium will o~er dior- ing ~ws on whed~r this coml~x and confusing method of f~dernJ intet~ntion--.,~d par~-'uJ~ty tim ru~nt pmposais for dn,~ging it---~m~g',h~ns our ddes and t~eir residents or weakens ~m. At a second s~npos~um, speakers wal consider t~e laws. reg- ulations a.nd enticement i;n~:edu~s that ate intended to offer oppesing ideas on the e~,cts and wisdom of federal cie- regulation, the point at which government involvement comes government L.m'usion and the growing roles that ~e courts ate playing in guiding cities' compliance wi~ federal Speakers at e ~ symposium wal consider the wa~s in people--by providing educatic~ health and web'am pro- gran~ removing bar. rs to progress and open~g, up new oppommides for growth. The speakers will debam govem- ment~ role in p~tecting individual righ~ and p~vidlng for the pu~ic welfare and how the essential tights of individuals can be promcuad as the federal government gives greater m- ^ ~our~ symposium will offer opposing views on the federal ~4ew argues that the fedend govemrnent should maintain a conceme~ about where grow~ takes I~ace. The a~et an~es that the federal government should strengthen dis~ess~ areas and even out the varying econOnuc grow01 rates of re- gion~ states and cities. ciai half-day, pubUC-l~vate forum at which u~e role of ~e p~ veto sector in munici~l affairs and municipa~ problems will be explored, in these worksho~ a variety of sbaakem will out, me ~ne pit. Is and pomnt~a~ of using private business to provide public service~ joining forms with businet~ nnd civic organizations for dovmtown ~evelopment. transit inve~t- meets. Job training programs and other important city ac. ~vities; and channeling the energy and funds of volunteers and philan0~op~c groups for the benefit oft~e city and its Congress of Cities wiU offer a wide range of workshops in which ~e broad issues of~e debate will be t~anslated into increment financtng, enterprise ~ones and indusU'iai revenue the a~Jtru~ pro.ems of cities, the ..~ai,~ of land u~ mg~a- ~ ~ ~oft~ ~s ~~s ~ ~ ~ ~ $75. f~ ~ $75. ~MCE CON~TA~ON ~ ~s~ w~ ~wr o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w~ ~ ~ ~ m~ ~s ~e ~ o~r ~ ~s~ wa ~us ~ ~ ~ m~n. ~gh- f~ ~ WHAT GOES ON AT THE CONGRESS OF CITIES The five days c~ ~e Gongmss c~ Ci~se induc~ a va~ of a~ ~a~~of~ ~ex- ~ ~ w~m ~a. ~ ~ ~ of~ w~c~~ 1:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m. ~ cc~mt~mm buMne~ ses~xts 4:30 p.m.-~:00 p.m. Sl:mClaJ wodc~ops 6:30 p.m.-&00 I~n~ Web:om~9 mmp~oa g:00 a.r~-10:l 5 a.nt Opening 9enersl samoa 10:.30 ~.m.-12:00 no~ Symposia e~ Rett~king ti~ Fedaral $yswn I1:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Expostlkxl opea 12:00 rmoo-$:45 p.m, Lunch ill ~le exbllit ball 2:00 p.nt-3:30 p.m. Program wodu~o~ 3:¢5 p.m.-5:15 p.nt Pregram woda~ops 9:.00 a.m.-t0:30 a.m. Genera] sess~:m 10.30 a.m.-altm'nocm Annua) ~ mee~g 7:00 p.m. Annu~ banqu~ PROGRAM WORKSHOPS 'IYanspona~aG Oemg~M~o~ C~n Smafl C~es Surv~a)? (SC:) moc~ Gmn~ Operas and Oppm~un~ V~unme~'~ Can ~t ~dt I~ Your CommunJr~ Compara~e Worth: ks lmpaa o~ Local Governme~ S~eet People: Ca,rig Jot rM Homekss C~I Rig~ New toc~ ~pmmb~ise POLICY DEVELOPMENT ACTI~iTU~S Sunday's main business is the meetin9 of the standing policy conuniuees. During the ye~ tbs smering com- mittoes of NLC's tire ~nding commirtees---F1n~Ye, ergy, Environment and Natural P, eseurces~ q~msporta- ~ and Communicatioas; Human Developmem; and Community and £conomic Deveinpmeat--have da- bm~i possible changes w the National Municipal POUcy. At the Cung~ss of Cl~ies d~e ~ standing commJuees meet, first in morning serninar~ at which steering commiuee members and outside speakers brief mem- bers on key policy k~suss, and ~hen in aftemnon ses-, mendadons ~or poUcy changes. Only poUcy comm~uee members may vom at the peUcy comm~uee business sesskms, although meetings a~ open to aU interes~d. Po~'T comm~uee r~ommendatkms are sent to the resoltnions con'urdttee, which in turll c~eates a com- posite s~ate of proposed changes for the entire mem- bership to act on at Wednesday's business meeting. If you'd lik~ more information on how to int.q:~cluca polio/proposals for comddaratkm a~ the Congress of Cities. w~te to ~ Davis. Direaot. O~ca of Policy Analysis and DevelepmenL Na~onal League of Cities, 1301 Peunsylvenia Avenue NW, Wash~g~n. D.C. 20004. ANNUAL BUSINESS MEE'I~IG The voting membership adapts Natk~al Municipal ~:of icy and elects o~'ers and new members of the board of directors at the Wednesday business meeting. WhUe ail delegates to the Congress of Cities may at- tend the business meeting, oniy o~cial voting repre- sentatives of direct member cities and member state municipal leagues have floor pr~vgeges, may speak on issues and may vote at the bUSiness meeting. Each member state municipal league is en~ded to cast 20 votes, and each d~rect member city may cast from one to 20 votes, hasecl on the city's size. To cast those votes, the city must designate a city official as its vot- ing delegate. GENERAL SESSIONS The purpose of the general sesskms at the Congress of Cibes is m 9~ve the ck~ official a netinnal parspecdve o~ ~ issues. At the Monday morning general ses- ~ ~e Tuesday luncheons and the Wednesday mom- dress the dak~gates on current urban issues. CONSTITUENCY GROUP MEETINGS Some of the special interest groups that usually meet durin9 the Congress of Cities are: · Woman in Municipal Government (WIMG) · Labor Relations Advisory Committee · Mayors' Aides · University Communities Caucus · Elected Spanish Speaking O~:ials lESS0) · Small Cities Advisory Counca ($CAC) · National Black Caucus of Local ~lected O~clais (NBC/LEO) Specifics on these meetings and those of o~er groups will not be aveilabla until late summer, II you'd like mom information about a ~ group, write Cun- stituency Groups, Off~ce of' Membership Services, Na- ~ League of Cities. 1301 Pennsl4venia Avenue NW. Washingto~ D.C. 20004. STATE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE bIEETINGS Many state municipal leagues bold meetings for their clalaga~es atmnding ~ Congress of Cities. For infor- mation on the time and place of any meeting planned [or your state delagafion, consult your state league ex- ecutive direaor. Me.ntal Health. Association in Hennepln County 5501 Green Valley Drive Room 103 Bloomington, MN 55437 612-835-9046 BOARD OF DIRECTORS *Charles Clay Rick Clugston Stephen Cook *Beverly Cordes *Vern Devine Beth Finlayson Sy Gross Sue Harris Meredith Hart *Roger Heegaard Tilford Hellie Ann Hommeyer *Mary Howey Nancy Jefferson Helen Klanderud Bobble Kleinschmidt Gary Lesney Jean Lowe Roy Maiden Arlayne Nelson *Nancy Newlund Melvin Ogurak Rosemary Prosen Thomas Rogers Mtiriel Ryden Cy Schelly Hal Schippits Verlyn Smith Don Storm Pat Strong Sandra Weber OFFICERS PRESIDENT Mary Howey VICE PRESIDENTS Charles Clay Roger Heegaard SECRETAR Y~ TREASURER Beverly Cordes *EXECUTIVE COMMrlTEE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Ellen Benavides A Non-Profit E~lucational and Advocacy Organization · Supported by Voluntary Contributions July 19, 1982 Mr. John Elam 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Elam: The Hennepin County Chapter of the Mental Health Association of Minnesota and the Council of Mental Health Pcograms in Hennepin County would like to invite you to our second presentation and public discussion of problems our community is facing as a result of the changing economy. The forum is scheduled for August 10th at the Government Center, Board Room, 24th Floor. We will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m. and conclude by 3:30 p.m. During 1980-81, client loads increased dramatically in mental health programs. At the forum last year, we presented data highlighting these trends and discussed implications for the future. Business leaders from the community joined us in presenting information about the relationship between the economy and increased client loads for mental health programs. Once again, we would like to share information and provide a forum for public discussion. The title of the program is "Impact o~ a Changing Economy on Mental Health in Hennepin County" and a copy of the program is enclosed. A panel of reactors from the business community will present information from their perspective. We are 'hoping that elected. officials from Hennepin County and key figures in the criminal justice system will add to this discussion as they did last year. Sincerely, Ellen Bena¥ides D i recto r Hennepin County Chapter Mental Health Association Chair Hennepin County Council of Mental Health Programs Enclosure IMPACT OF A CHANGING ECONOMY ON MENTAL HEALTH IN HENNEPIN COUNTY 2 P.M. - Tuesday August 10, 1982 BOARD ROOM - 24~ Floor Hennepin County Government Center 300 S. 6th Street, Mp!s. Introduction of the Program: Ms. Kathryn Szymoniak, Director of Chrysalis; Chair, Council of Mental Health Programs Welcome: Mr. John Derus, Chair, Hennepin County Board of Commissioners STATUS REPORT: Some National Perspective - Ms. Ellen Benavides, Director Hennepin County Mental Health Assoc. The Impact of McKnight Programs - Mr. Don Storm, Director Tasks Unlimited Update on HennePin County Situation - Ms. KathrYn Szymoniak VIEW FROM THE coMMuNITY: Small Employers - Dr, Diane Olson, Executive.Vice President dot & Associates Labor Perspective - Ms. Caron Graham, Program Coordinator, Twin Cities Building Trades Employees Assistance ProgPam Large Employers - Mr. Jay Campbell, Director, Employee Assistance Program, Northwest BANCO Question Session: questions from audience - Ail Panelists REFRE SH~ENTS/! NFORMAL DISCUSSION Sponsored and organized by the Council of Mental Health Programs in Hennepin County and the Hennepin County Mental Health Association. HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Burlington Northern Task Force Tuesday, July 20, 1982 ~Central District Services Building MEETING NOTES Mr. Dennis McLeod stated to the users the findings and projections of BN from their survey results. -. Basically, BN had reclassified the Hutchinson branch line after reviewing past and projected revenue. When the revenue f~om the past five months was compared with' actual business, the Hutchinson line did not meet projections and BN is now watching the line carefully to see if the traffic increases and thus warrant rehabilitation. The rehabilitation/abandonment map is reviewed each June and we have nine months to change the current statistics~ BN had determined to rehabilitate all the track to at least 100-115 pound rail to facilitate heavy traffic in 1984. Now that our revenue is down they will review it again in the Spring to either go back into Category one (1) or be scheduled for rehabilitation. A discussion on the proposed connector track through the Industrial Park with the ability to facilitate Farmers Elevator and the north side of the river. This trackage would increase revenue by adding back at least five '(5) major shippers. BN stated they would have figures on the connector track in three (3) weeks. Shippers present urged BN to consider:. 1. That the survey was a five (5) year projection not a six (6) month survey. 2. The economy has been down everywhere and every shipper is staying close to inventory lines with less storage. '3. To evaluate Hutchinson usage with their other lines. Was our percentage of use down any further than other areas due to economy. 4. That in the past year after the red flagging of the bridge, we lost some of our major shippers. 5. Service has been very unreliable due to the condition of the track, connections, and long delays of shipments. That poor service has resulted in some shippers having to rely more heavily on trucks° BN stated it will cost $7,000,000.00 to rehabilitate line; that they would consider help from state or federal funds (803). In the end, it will be a business decision based on revenue exceeding expenses. The city of Hutchinson has some funds set aside to help construct the area for the connector track. Everyone concerned wants the assurance that if that money is spent for this facility, we will have continued and improved rail service to justify the expenditure. Another meeting will be call'ed with BN in January 1983. We will report later on the determination of the connector track. Notes: Clarice Coston Burlington Northern Meeting Attendance List July 20, 1982 1. Rock Lindlan 2. Joe.Fogarty 3. Darrell C. Haugen 41 Les Forman 5. Jack L. Cauch 6. Sheldon Vies '' 7. Cathy Nevanen 8. Larry Graf 9. Dick Bowman 10. Jon Sxhwichtenberg 11. Bill Valek 12. Julius Rainwater 13. Adolph Kvam 14. Marlow V. Priebe 15. Galen Houk 16. John Bernhagen 17. Jon Ransau 18. Ray Zimmerman 19. Roger Stearns 20. Denny McLeod 21. Gary Anderson 22.'Jean Arndt 23. Rich Batie City of Mound Farmers Covop, Lester Prairie Harris Pine Mills Lester's Burlington Northern RoR. 3-M Hutch Leader KDUZ Tonka Toys Lester's Cenex Pure Cu~ure Products State Representative City Engineer, Hutchinson Great Pl'ains Supply Senate Hutchinson M~g. & Sales Farmers Elevator Stearnswood Burlington Northern LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 5541E (612) 920-2717 July 26~ 1982 Mr, Jon Elam City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN55364 RE,: Kenneth Block Dear Jon,: It is not hard to understand why no one recognized the name Kenneth Block.. Fran did some research and discovered that he was employed by the City as a CETA employee for the sum-, mar of 1977 on the parks payroll. It appears the charge for the three eye injury claims he experienced during 1977 were properly made against the City of Mound. I will check out the other names and advise. Regards, W.E. Husbands WEH/bko WILLIAM E. HUSBANDS 5207 W. 28TH STREET ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 ($ 12) 920°2? 17' July 26, 1982 Mr. Jon Elam City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Letter of Understanding Dear Joni This will confirm the Council's.actions Of Tuesday, July 20, 1982o It was agreed that I would be employed as an independent contractor by the City of Mound from August 1, i982 untii August i, i983 at a totai compensation of $4,800. It is agreed this is to be paid at a rate of $400 per month on the iSth of each month beginning August i5, i982. For this compensation, I wiii be performing a number of services in the Risk Management area. This wii1 incIude: 'SERVICES Risk Management Policy Statement Loss Rrevention & Loss Control Rolicy Statement Review workers compensation loss runs to determine all charges by City employees Review workers compensation loss runs with current carrier to determine accuracy of reserves Assist in the renewal process TIME TABLE by September 1982 by October 1982 by October 1982 by November 1982 by February 1983 / ?23 Mr. ~on Elam Letter of Understanding Page Two Clarify subrogation files to get credit on workers compen- sation experience modifier Clarify experience modifier and get necessary credit Implement written policy statements throughout City by Au~bst 1983 by August 198~ Requires continous mon- itoring throughout year If this meets with your understanding, please sign at the acknowledgement. Keep one copy for your records and return one signed copy for my records° Once again, I want to thank you for your considerations and I look forward to a productive and profitable year° Regards, W.E. Husbands ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: DATE: WEH/bko MWCC Conference Conference Plan as of 6/2/82 Date and Place: ~riday, September 24,..1982, a.t~the Hopkins House, 1501 Highway 7, Hopkins. Registration fee: $t-5._~ · 8:30 a.m. Late registration at the door. 9:00 a.m. Morning Session opening remarks. · Clayton L. LeFevere, Morning Session moderator. 9:05 a.m. Orientation to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commis- sion; its history, organization and the regulatory framework within which it must operate. Salsbury Adams, Chairman of the MWCC 9:30' a.m. MWCC costs, funding and the basis for sewer charges. Richard L. Berg, MWCC Controller 10:00 a.m. Oversight of the MWCC; present relationships. Representative Gordon Voss, Chairman, House Local and Urban Affairs Committee 10:15 a.m. Morning. break. 10:30 a.m. Panel discussion: Is there a .need for additional Is there a need for a dispute-resolution oversight? mechanism? Representative Connie Levi (alter- nates: Representative Carolyn Rodriguez, Rep. John Brandt) James Willis, City Manager, City of Plymouth (Member to be designated by St. Paul Chamber) Charles Weaver, Chairman, Metro Council 11:30 a.m. Question and Answer Session. Morning speakers and panelists Noon: Lunch (provided). 1:00 -p.m. 1:05 p.m. 1:45 p.m. 2:15 p.m. 2:30 p.m. 3:20 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Afternoon Session opening remarks. Mary Anderson, President, Asso- ciation of Metropolitan Municipalities, Afternoon Session moderator Requirements of the state and federal governments Louis J. Breimhurst, Executive Director, MPCA Robert Foxen, Consultant and formerly with the EPA IsSues before the Mwcc, capital constructiOn, alter- natives and anticipated sewer rates. George Lusher, Chief Administrator, MWCC Afternoon break Panel discussion: Reactions to previous presentations. Marion Watson, former Citizen Representative to MPCA, (elected municipal official} south suburban area) Graydon Boeck, Consulting Engineer ( ), Business repre- sentative selected by Mpls. Chamber Barbara Lukerman, consultant, former chairman, MWCC Question and Answer Session. Afternoon speakers and panelists Closing remarks. Curtis Johnson, Executive Director, Citizens League. ?~rk Birect~r · 2~ Weuld yeu please ~sk the c~ty' c~unci~ te N appreYe s 30.00 dollar~' refund for w~od chipping kk,' deposit t~ Rit~' Peders~n ~h8 F~irview ~. Mo~d, ~ Mn. 55364 '-, f