The URL can be used to link to this page

82-10-26CITY OF MOUND MOUND CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 26, 1982 7:30 P.M. - City Hall AGENDA Mound, Minnesota 1. Minutes of October 12, 1982, Regular Meeting 2. Request of Mr. Ed McCabe to Reduce His Water Bill 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Final~ Adoption of 1983 Revenue Sharing Budget B. Delinquent Water & Sewer Bills for October 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: A. So o Case No. 82-145 - Wayne Bird (Dale Pixler, Rep.) 1776 Shorewood Lane MAP 2 Part of Lots 3 & 4, Block 3, Shadywood Point Final Subdivision.of Lot 3, Block 3, Shadywood Point B. Case No. 82-146 - Ron Gehring MAP 9 Grove Lane & Beachwood Lots 54 and the West 25 feet of Lot 46, Aud. Subd. 168 Final Plat Approval for Newhouse Builders Addition C. Case No. 82-147 - Nichol & Lucille Bryce MAP 12 3143 Devon Lane Lots 11, 12 & 13, Block 4, Arden Setback Variance fur attached garage D. Case No. 82-139 - Ronald L. Pelarski MAP 2 Bluebird Lane Lots 2-4 & 21-23, Block 7, Woodland Point Final Subdivision Approval E. Case No. 82-148 - The Streetcar Boat Center, Inc. Lots 35 & 37, Auditor's Subd. 170 & Block 4, Shirley Hills Unit F MAP 5 ConceEt Plan Review for Streetcar Boat Shopping Center Presentation from Saul Smiley of Smiley-Glotter Associates of Preliminary Plans for Town Square Shopping Center and to Request the City to Begin Tax Increment District Planning Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present (please limit to 3 minutes) Application for Bingo Permit - Mound Fire Dept. Auxiliary Report on 1982 Seal Coating Program Budget Breakdown Resolution Transferring from the Liquor Fund to the 1982 Seal Coating Program - $78,926.21 BIDS/QUOTATIONS A. Dredging of Common's Dock Sites -Emerald Channel & Ridgewood Access (to be paid from 1982-83 Revenue Sharing Funds) - Don Rother Pg. 2372-2377 Pg. 2378-2380. Pg. 2381 Pg. 2382-2384 Pg. 2385 Pg. 2386-2394 Pg. 2395-2403 Pg. 2404-2410 Pgo 241'1-2418 Pg. 2419-2430 Pg. 2431-2435 Pg. 2436 Pg, 2437 Pg. 2438 Pg. 2439 Page 2370 10o 11o 12. 13. B. Approve Installation of Commons Dock Steps on Avocet and Bluebird Lane (Work to be performed in .Spring of 1983 & paid from Revenue Sharing Funds) - Chris Bollis C. Fall Pick-Up Quotations (to be paid from Revenue Sharing Funds) D. Central Business District - Snow Removal Bids 1983 Law Enforcement Labor Service Contract. for the two .Police Supervisor Positions - Effective January 1, 1983 - Bruce Wold Approval of Bid Specifications for Diesel Power Single Axle 27,500 GVW with Plow, Wing, Dump Body and Sander. Bid Opening November 23, 1982, at 10:00 A.M~' Payment of Bi'lls INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Nine Month Liquor Store Balance Sheet B. Agenda Minnehaha Creek Watershed District C. Twin Cities Labor Market Information Report D. Packet on Recently Approved Seni'or Citizen Housing Project E. Budget Analysis - Mound Bay Park Project F. Budget Analysis - Downtown Advisory Committee G. American Legion Post 398 Gambling Report H. 1982 Summer Recreation Program Report I. State Report on Legislative Mandates for Cities (information) J. Speed Limit Changes on County Road Il0 K. Lake Minnetonka Mayor's Forum Pg. 2440-2442 Pg. 2443-2445 Pg. 2446-2448 Pg. 2449-2451 Pgo 2452-2457 Pg. 2458 Pg. 2459-2461 Pg. 2462-2463 Pg. 2464-2471 Pg. 2472-2487 Pg. 2488 Pg. 2489-2490 Pg. 2491 Pg. 2492-2496 Pg. 2497-2504 Pgo 2505-2507 Pg. 2508 Page 2371 210 October 12, 1982 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin'County, Minnesota,' was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on October 5, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. Those present.were: Mayor Rock Lindlan, Councilmembers Pinky Charon, Robert Polston, .Gordon Swenson. Councilmember Ulrick was late and arrived at 7:40 P.M. Also present were: City Manager Jon.Elam, City Attorney Jim Larson, City Clerk Fran Clark; and the following interested citizens: Mr. & Mrs. John Wagman, Steve Smith, Ron Gehring, Margaret Hanson, Tom Watson, Russ Peterson. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people attending. He introduced Steve .Smith as a candidate for the City Council. MINUTES The Minutes of the OCtober 5, 1982, .Regular Meeting were presented for consideration. Swenson'movedand. Charon seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the October 5; 1982, Regular Meeting as submitted. The vote.was. unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING A. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OF .UNPAID TREE REMOVAL CHARGES The City Manager explained that a tree fell from private property across the Lost Lake Channel blocking.the channel. The City asked the owner to remove the tree in two separate letters dated September 7 and September 13, 1982. The tree was not removed and under pressure from citizens who use the Channel .as access to Lost Lake, the City was forced to remove the tree. The City Attorney advised the Staff to treat this fallen tree the same as a .tree falling across a public.street or onto public property from private.property. The cost of removing this tree was unusually high because 'it was lying across the channel; the owner of the property where the tree fell from would not allow the City on his property to remove the tree and therefore the City had to hire a barge company to remove the tree from the lake. The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if the owner of the property would like to be heard. Mr. John Wagman,'5469 Bartlett Blvd.. read the following statement that was prepared by his attorney: "We, the owners of Lot 16, the Bartlett Place, Upper Lake.Minnetonka, according to the plat thereof, hereby object, to the assessment of property'by the City of Mound, pursuant to subdivision 1, Minnesota .Statute 429.O61 on the grounds that the City of Mound and the County of Hennepin have a duty to maintain the channel which crosses over our property, which includes tree removal if a tree should obstruct that channel, at public expense." Signed, John Wagman and Ellen Wagman. 211 October 12, 1982 Margaret Hanson stated that she felt the City should at least pay for part of the removal of the tree because the channel is used by Mound residents. She further stated that the Wagman do not use the channel and therefore she felt derived no benefit from the tree being removed. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Charon moved the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-273 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID TREE REMOVAL CHARGES SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,5OO.00 (rID #24-!17-24 23 00191 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AND SPREAD OVER 8 YEARS AT 8% INTEREST A roll:call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. L.M.C.D. EXPIRATION OF TERMS OF BOARD MEMBERS The City Manager presented the COuncil with a letter and attendance record summary from .the L.M.C.D. The letter is notifying the City that Orval Fenstad's term on the Board expired ~in'September, 1982. .The attendance records were from OctOber .1979.to September 1982. During that per)od several persons were appointed as our representative to the L.M.C.D. The attendance records showthat our representatives.have not attended even half of the meeti'ngs. The City Manager stated that he is willing tO volunteer to represent the City at the L.M.C.D. Meetings'because he will be able to gai.n more information about the Lake Minnetonka area and bring it directly back to the Council. Swenson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82~274 RESOLUTION.APPOINTING JON ELAM AS MOUNDS REPRE- SENTATIVE TO THE L.M.C.D. FOR THE 3 YEAR TERM ENDING SEPTEMBER, 1985. The vote was unani'mously in favor. Motion carried. MC NAUGHTON PROPERTY - LOTS'4,5, .& 6, BLOCK 5, SETON The City Manager presented a letter from John R. McNaught°n offering to donate Lots 4,5, and 6, Block 5, Seton; to the City, via a quit c)aim deed, with the covenant that the property be used only as a wildlife refuge. This.property connects with City owned property but is under water.. It is also tax delinquent and if nothing is done before November 1, 1982, the property will go tax forfeiture and the City could acquire it then with ~no strings attached. Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a.motion directing the City Manager to negotiate with the owner of the property to obtain it with no covenants or strings attached. The vote was unanimously in favor. Mot[on carried. PARKING ON LYNWOOD BLVD. The City Manager explained that the Police Chief is recommending that the Council amend the parking ordinance to allow a two hour parking zone from 90 feet west of Commerce B)vd. to 350 feet west of Commerce Blvd. on the North side of Lynwood Blvd. This will allow adequate parking within a short 212 0ctober"12, 1982 distance of the new Westonka Senior Center and will probably not create a problem. Polst6n moved and Swenson seconded the following: ORDINANCE #442 AMENDING CHAPTER 46, SECTION 46.29, SUB. (c), SUBSECTION 2 OF THE CITY CODE TO READ - TWO HOUR PARKING ZONE FROM 90 FEET WEST OF COMMERCE BLVD. TO 350 FEET WEST OF COMMERCE BLVD. ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LYNWOOD BLVD. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. GAME OF SKILL LICENSE Charon moved and Ulrick seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-275 RESOLUTION APPROVING A GAME OF SKILL LICENSE FOR THE VFW POST #5113 - VALID UNTIL APRIL 30, 1983 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DISCUSSION The City Manager explained 'that Mike Smith of Smith Heating and Air Condi- tioning has inquired about either buying or renting the Anderson Building. This poses that pr.oblem of what to do with .the equipment we store in that building if it were leased or sold. We have some new equipment now that will not fit in the Anderson Building and Tonka Corporation has agreed to let us store that equipment in one of their buildings in Spring Park but we still have to problem of the rest of the equipment stored there. He has talked with the Public Works people, the Police Dept. and Mike Smith and Smith would be agreeable to renting about 1OO0 square feet of the Anderson Building f.or cold storage for $1.O0 per square foot. We could work this out on a month, to month basis. The City Manager recommended to the Council that they appoint a 3 person committee (citizens from the.community) to work wlth Public Works and put together some of the choices or alternatives, sites, projected costs, etc. for either a new Public Works Building or an addition to the present Island Park site or any other options that are open. The Council agreed that this was a good idea and will help get names of qualified persons to serve on this Committee. The Council also agreed to renting the 1000 square feet of the Anderson Building to Mike Smith, COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT The Mayor asked if any of the citizens present wished to voice comments or suggestions. There were none. The Mayor then introduced Russ Peterson as another candidate running for the City Council. PAYMENT OF BILLS Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list, in the amount of $194,726.67, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 213 October 12, 1982 AWARD OF BID FOR POLICE SQUAD CAR The City Manager explained that 8 bids were received fo.r the purchase of 1 new 1983 squad car. The low bid was Superior Ford for a 1983 Crown Victoria S in the amount of $9,631.00. He fur.ther explained that the City can probably sell the old squad .car for from $2,5OO to $3,000 so the net cost will be less. Polston moved and.Swanson seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-276 RESOLUTI'ON AWARDING THE BID'EOR THE 1983 POLICE .SQUAD CAR TO T.HE LOW BIDDER SUPERIOR FORD IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,631.O0 The'vote was unanimously in .favor. Motion carried. ARCADE HOURS - TOM WATSON. The City. Manager explained that Mr. Watson.~as.requested th.at the hours that the Arcade is open be .extended. A~ present, In ReSolot~.on 82-85, the hours are: 2:30 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. - Sunda¥,.thlru .Friday 2:30 P.M. to 10:O0 P.M. - Saturday. He would like them extended as follows: 2:30 P.M; to ll:OOP.M,..'- SUnday tbrb Friday' 11:O0 A.M,.to 1.2:O0.Midn~ght - Saturday He feels thi'$ wouid.redu~e the problem'of all the kids ieav~g at one .ti.me in large groups.and ending up at either th:e S,A, Station o~ tee. Tom Thumb due to the early closing instead of going d~rectly home, Mr, ~atson assured the Council that h~ will'observe the.curfew hours for k~ds.under . the'age of 16 and not allow them tn his establishment after the curfew h.o~r, Swenson moved and Polston seconded the folloWing resolution.. RESOLUTION #82-277 RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CONDtTIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED .IN RESOLUTION #82-85 EXTENDING THE HOUK$ AS'REqUESTED The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. VACATION OF SULGROVE ROAD - SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING The City Manager explained that the Bialon's who had previously, requested the vacation of Sulgrove Road in order to get their home off of. public prope.rty'have, woKked with the City Attorney and'the Cit¥-.Engilneer on a viable solution and are now requesting that vacatilon. Charon moved and Ulrick seconded the following resoluti;on. RESOLUTION #82-278 RESOLUTION SETTING NOVEMBER 9, 1982, AT 7;30 P.M, AS THE DATE FOR THE PUBL!C HEARING. ON TBE VACATION OF SULGROVE ROAD The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried, 214 October 12, 1982 I NFORMAT I 0N/M I SC EL LANEOUS A. Letter from the Watershed District to the DNR - Regarding the Headwaters Control Structure - Management Policy and Operating Resources B. Minutes of the Lake Minnetonka Mayor's Association - Meeting held on August 5, 19~ C.' Housin] Conference Flyer - Program: Public-Private Partnership: It's More than Just Money - to be held October 27, 1982, at the Sheraton Midway, starting at 4:30 P.M. 'Conference fee, including dinner, is $13.50 a person.. · Please.let the City Clerk know by October 21, 1982,.if you intend to attend this conference. D. Letter from the Citz of Orono'- Announcing the town meeting to be held Wednesday, October 20, 19-~, at 7:30 P.M. at the Orono Middle School Auditorium located at Highway 12 and the Old Crystal Bay Road. E. Westonka Chamber of Commerce "Waves" - for October, 1982. F. Copy of the David Hozza A~reement - consultant on the proposed downtown redevelopment. G. HRA Memo from the City Attorney - Answers to questions raised by the Council at a previous meeting. The Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion to adjourn at 8:45 P.M. vote was unanimously in fa.vor. Motion carried. Jon Elam, City Manager Fran Clark, City Clerk BILLS ..... OCTOBER 12, 1~82. Ben Franklin Blackowiak & Son Holly Bostrom Burl ington Northern Buds Radiator & Body Bryan Rock Prod Bowman Barnes Janet Bertrand Gregg Bergqui st Robert Cheney Bill C. lark Standard Coast to Coast Continental Telephone Robert Cheney Dependable Servi ces Dray Pub1 ications Jon Elam Jack Farness Finley Bros. Enterprises G 1 enwood Ing ] ewood Eugene Hickok & Assoc Henn Co. Treas Hawkins Chemi cai Henn Coop Seed Exchange' Henn Co.' Sheriffs Dept Robert Johnson The Laker Doris Lepsch Marina Auto Supply Miller Davis Mound F Mound Hdwe Wm Mueller & Sons. MertJns Navarre City of Mound ,, MN Academy Prosec No. Star Chapt ICBO Navarre Hdwe N.S.P. Popham, Haik, Schnobrich Riteway Motor Parts Brad Roy E.H. Rennet & Sons Greg Skinner State Bank of Mound Shepherds Rental.=Rugs Spring Park Car Wash Stern, Levine, Schwartz State Bank of Mound Tri State Drilling Tulberg & Brakke Tonka Tools Inc Lw Enforc 191.O3 56.00 263.00 533.33 18.O0 196.O2 153.88 37.97 166.05 275.00 2,082.15 121.19 1,124.84 334.00 33.00' 483.31 5.95 275.OO 9,940.00 ~3.80 110.00 2,957.46 281.17 49.50 831.30. 34.32 192.30 15.00 376.35 341.25 4,479:40 16.20 881.55 37.OO 69.91 33.70 168.oo llO. O0 255.32 4,330.30 5,222.79 96.OO 15.o0 10,668.00 175.85 lo1,159.50 320.05 58.00 2,740.28 lO.30 78.7O 550.00 144.00 Tweeds Service Garage Village Chevrolet Vanwaters & Rc.3ers Water Pr°ducts Winner Industries Admiral Chemical Auto Con Industries Applebaums Anthony's Floral Acro Minnesota Albinson TOTAL BILLS LIQUOR BILLS -- Bradley Exterminating Butch's Bar Supply Cash Register Sales City Club Distrib Coca Cola Bottling Day Distrib East Side Beverage Gold Medal Beverage Home Juice Kool Kube Ice Mark Vll Sales Midwest Wine A.J. Ogle Pepsi Cola/7 Up Pogreba Distrib Real One Acquisition Regal Window Clean Thorpe Distrlb Griggs Cooper Johnson Bros. Liquor MN Distillers Old Peoria Ed Phillips TOTAL LIQUOR BILLS GPAND TOTAL--ALL BILLS 54.oo 43.46 358.2o 124.9~ 1.6)' 162.35 157.22 lO.2O 25.00 129.91 24.30 154,233.22 19.00 461.59 67.19 2,989.80 275.27 2,742.02 4,200.36 180.00 54.74 215.30 284.00 963.50 2,206.8" 183.5, 3,533.15 675.oo 10.75 4,75O.7O 3,492.92 6,599.53 1,894.00 2,314.55 2,379.71 40,493.45 194,726.67 October 21, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD RO'AD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Mr. Ed McCabe of Richfield wishes to meet with the City Council to ask that his water bill at 4700 Tuxedo (a rental property) be reduced, because he said he didn't use 300,000 gallons of water. His meter indicates he did. Enclosed is my letter to him outlining the options he has. I can adjust water bills where evidence suggests they should be, but to arbitrarily reduce a bill to the tune of 300,000 gallons because the owner says "common sense" says I should, I leave to the Council. JE:fc CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 September 16, 1982 Mr. Ed McCabe 4700 Tuxedo 'Blvd. Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Mr. McCabe: I have now read the meter cards for 4700.Tuexdo. Blvd. from September 30, 1975, to the 'present' and quite honestly I don't think this information provides any new information on elther the outside reader or the inside meter. From September 30, 1975, until September 24, 1979, your bills f~r 4700 Tuexdo were minimums because the inside meter was stuck. An outside reader was not used · at this address until 1979. On September.24, 1979, the inside meter and outside reader were jointly set for 35,000 gallons. On November 8, 1979, .both had increased to 44,000 gallons. for the following period.' Both the meter and the reader remained the same 11-8-79 44,000 - 2-2-80 65,000 2-20-80 65,000 - 5-20-80 99,000' 5-20-80 99,000 - 8-20-80 125,000 8-20-80 125,000. - 11-20-80 144,000 11-20-80 144,000 : - 2-20-81 163,000 2-20-81 163,000 - 5-20-81 182,000 5-20-81 182,000 - 8-20-81 200,000 8-20-81 200,000. - 11-20~81 207,000 11-20-81 207,000 - 2-20-82 207,000* The outside reader became-stuck somewhere between May and .November of 1981 The City record shows that the inside'meter was at 237,000 as of 2-20-82. The outside reader remained stuckand the City then used the inside meter reading .which by May 20,-1982, was 510~000, an increase of nearly 300,000 (over.the 207,000) from November 19~1. What you Were billed for in the most recent billing wes the 510,000 total. That is the only total that is acdurate since the outside 'reader has not worked since sometime in 1981. The issue is that there was a discrepancy between the outside.reader and the inside meter wh.ich the water flows through. You were billed for the reading on the inside, main meter. You feel the reading on the outside reader was probably more'accuract. There is only one way an issue like this can be resolved and that is to have the meter tested. It seems to me that there is no way anyone can prove beyond a doubt that the water wasn't used during the period of time the house was empty. If the water had been shutoff, by the City crew at the shut-off in the street, it would have been alot more conclusive than the way Mr. Shager did it by simply shutting-off the inside turn 6ff. Page September 16, 1~82 Mr. Ed McCabe 'It hardly seems either fair or reasonable to just,arbitrarily say the meter must have been off because Mr. Shager says.he never used the water or that 300,000 gallons of water couldn't have been used., etc. Thus, I can't and won't just cancel 'the bill that is due the City. The one option you have in a .situation like this is to have the meter pulled out and we send it into the manufacturer to.have it tested. If 'it shows'an error, we will correct your bill immediately and put in a new meter. If it does not show an error, you will be obligated for.the bill. If you wish to have this done, please. ¢all Public Works at 472-1251 and we will schedule an appointment to pull out your existing meter. I realize that this isn't a very satisfactory solution for you on your problem, but as City Manager I can't'go around arbitrarily adjusting or changing water.bills without alot of solid evidence~.which I can't find in this particular case. . Si'ncerely, Jon Elam City Manager JE:fc CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF BUDGET HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that the Mound City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers on Tuesday, October 26, 1982, at 7:30 P.M., concerning the final adoption of the proposed 1983 Revenue Sharing Budget. Proposed uses are: l. Police Car 2. Spring & Fall Clean-Up 3. Dump Truck (1/2 Cost) 4. Civil Defense Siren 5. Codification of Ordinances 6. Radio (Police) 7. Commons Maintenance TOTAL $ 7,500 10,000 30,OOO 2,000 15,000 5OO 10~O00 $ 75,000 Citizens interested in commenting on this are urged to attend this meeting. Francene Co Clark City Clerk Publish in The Laker October 12, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 21, 1982 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Enclosed is this months delinquent water and sewer bill listo an updated list for the meeting. I will have JE:fc 33 406 2725 01 33 424 4738 41 33 427 2653 01 33 439 4751 51 33 439 4919 81 33 442 4452 41 33 463 4626 91 33 463 4955 21 33 469 4767 81 33 472 4555 11 33 475 4621 41 33 478 2854 71 33 484 2920 41 33 484 3113 51 33 484 3118 41 33 484 3331 31 33 484 4700 81 33 484 4708 11 .33 487 4873 61 33 500 4429 71 33 503 4440 81 33 506 3135 81 33 512 4512 51 33 515 3073 21 33 515 3155 71 33 518 4725 01 33 530 3118 41 33 539 4838 71 33 581 2901 71 33 587 3001 21 33 587 3041 81 33 596 4618 31 33 596 4724 41 33 596 4817 11 Delinquent water and sewer $'39.88 55.44 44.80 32.17 59.86' 72.96 · 81.16~' -88 14' 92.28 124.40 139.15 52.'20 85.92 121.30 65.76 83.79 226.79 93.52. 81.18 72.42 63.24 75~09 '60.48 42~60 43.79 143..76 135.89 83.38 88.68 93.00 61.92 108.22 118.46 72.12 10-19-82 Delinquent water and sewer 33 406 2725 01 33 424 4738 41 427 2653 01 33 439 4751 51 33 439 4919 81 33 442 4452 41 33 463 4626 91 33 463 4955 21 33 469 4767 81 33 472 4555 11 33 475 4621 41 33 478 2854 71 33 484 2920 41 33 484 3113 51 33 484 3118 41 33 484 '3331 31 33 484 4700 81 33 484 4708 11 487 4873 61 33 500 4429 71 33 503 4440 81 33 506 3135 81 33 512 4512 51 33 515 3073 21 33 515 3155 71 33 518 4725 01 33 530 3118 41 33 539 4838 71 33 581 2901 71 33 587 3001 21 33 587 3041 81 33 596 4618 31 33 596 4724 41 33 596 4817 11 Sharon Berry Susan Oenn Mike Sherman Lorraine Stageberg Bruce Johnson Lowell Hanson Jill Krueger Heather Stiles Robert Moulton R Christopherson Larry Houn David Borett Paul Zueznet Robert Wagstrom G. Flattum David Mc Donald Ed ~c Cabe Louise Mc Kee Jerry Olsen. M. Hettherington Richard Baanruud Bruce Burton Hike Jacobs Marsha Jorgenson Thomas Horwitz Gary Gustner Rand Sarles Sally Swanson Richard Carlson John Flavin Robert Henti g D. Christianson Steven Gladieux $ 39.88 55.44 44.80 32.17 59.86' 72.96 81.16 88;14 92.28 124.40 139.15 52.'20 85.92 121.30 65.76 83.79 226.79 93.52 81.18 72.42 63.24 75.09 60.48 42,60 43.79 143.76 135.8~ 83.38 88.68 93.00 61.92 108.22 72.12 2725 Tyrone 4738 Galway Made arrangements 4751Wilshire 4919 Wilshire 4452 Denbigh 4626 Bedford 4955 Bedford Signed contract. Did not keep it 4555 Dorchester Made arrangements 2854 Essex Owner will pay 3i13 Tuxedo Blvd. 3118 Tuxedo Blvd. Made arrangements 4700 Tuxedo Blvd. Made arrangements Made arrangements Paid 4440 Lamberton Rd. ftade arrangements 4512 Clyde Rd. 3073 Inverness Rd. Made arrangements 4725 Hampton Rd. 3118 Donald Dr. Made arrangements 2901 Cambridge Ln. 3001 Brighton Blvd. 3041 Brighton Blvd. 4618 Hanover Rd. 4724 Hanover Rd.[~ 4817 Hanover(filed bankruptcy) 33 599 4781 31 33 620 3018 51 33 620 3126 61 33 620 4649 61 33 620 4738 71 44 647 5223 21 Sandra Andrews Ferner Johnson Tim Swenson Tom Prokasky James Brouckson G. Longley 60.57 50°40 80.22 Q~ ~9 54.0~ 4781 Aberdeen Rd. 3018 Island View Dr. Paid 4649 Island View Dr Paid 5223 Phelps Rd. $ 3 3 36.66 $3076.5~ 33 599 4781 31 33,620 30i8 51 33 620 3126.61 33 620 4649 61 33 620 4738 71 44 647 5223 21 60.57 50,40 75.36 80.22 '93.42 54.04 $3,317.76 ~o~o ONO~O 'l CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission Agenda of October 18, 1982. Board of Appeals Case No. 82-145 Location: 1766 Shorewood Lane Legal Descriptions: 1. That part of Lots 3 & 4, Blk. 3, Shady- wood Point, lying NWly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the most Sly corner of said Lot 3; thence NWly along the SWly line _ of said Lot 3 a distance of 10.5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting right 92°51' to the NEly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, and lying SEly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Wly corner of said Lot 3; thence SEly along the SWly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 19.72 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting left 92°55' to the NEly line of said lot, and there ending PID 13-117-24 11 Oi23 2. Lot 2 and that part of Lots 3 & 4 lying NWly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the most Sly corner of said Lot 3; thence NWly along the SWly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 10.5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting right 92°51' to the NEly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, Block 3, Shadywood Point PID:13-117-24 11 OOO1 Request: Final Subdivision of Lot 3, Block 3, Shadywood Point Zoning District: R-2 Applicant Wayne Byrd 1766 Shorewood Lane Representative for Owner: Dale Pixler & Associates Phone: 474-7337 The representative for the property owner, Wayne Byrd, is requesting to divide a property that was previously split several times over the past few years. As shown on Exhibit # 2, the Lots 3 and 4 had the original lot line relocated to allow a 6 foot sideyard for an existing structure to conform with setback require- ments. Secondly, the Lot 3 (after lot line relocation) was split as per Exhibit # 1 for the purchase of the homeowner of Lot 2 and the homeowner of Lot 4. Now, the applicant is requesting that Lot 3 revert back to the original Lot 3 with the relocation for a conforming sideyard to remain in place. Lot 3, as described, would exceed the R-2, 6,000 square foot lot area for a building site with a lot width deficiency of less than one foot. (39.44 feet instead of 40 feet required). The applicant is also requesting that Lot'3 be designated as a possible future building site. Recommend: I would recommend that the subdivision be granted l) As the conditions which had previously existed before September 22, 1981 were not altered, 2) The existing Lots 2 and 4 exceed the 6,000 square foot lot area in the R-2 Zoning District, 3) The Lot 3 be recognized as a future build- ing site, and 4) Any and all deficiencies of unit charges be paid or assessed on parcels due to subdivision of land, 5) The existing prin- cipal structures conform with setback requirements. Jan Bertrand Building Official BOARD OF APPEALS 1.'. Case No.. 82-145 Ftnb.1 Sabd'i'vi.s~'on of'Lot 3, Block 3, Shadywood Point Part of Lots 3 and 4, .Block 3, Shadywood Point' Dale Pixler was present representing the owner, Wayne Byrd. The City Manager explained that this.was the same 1or'that was split in half sometime ago to sell one half to the neighbor on the North and now that neigh- bor wants to buy the'second half of the lot as well; the request is to go back to the original parcel.before the split and combination with Lot 2. One Commissioner.questloned the setback of existing house; sideyard setback had been corrected by a previous change in the lot line between Lots'3 and 4; but the existing boathouse on 'Lot 4 is non-conforming. ~ei)and moved and O~Donn~ll seconded a motion to approve the subdivision as requested; the legal-to read as follows: New Pa.rcel' (A) That part of Lots 3 and 4 lying Northwesterly of a line described as follows: commencing at the most Southerly corned of said Lot 3; thence Northwesterly along the South-· westerly line of said Lot 3 a distance'of 10.5 feet to the point of beg.inning of the line being described; thence deflectlng right ~2°51"'to the North- easterly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, Block 3, Shady~ood Point. The vote on the motion was unanimously in favor. September ,22, 1981 Councilmember Fwe~son moved the following resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 81-304 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION AS REQUESTED - PID #13-117-24-11-0123 WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision requirements contained in Section 22.00 of the City Code has been filed with the City of Mound, and WHEREAS, said request for a waiver has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council, and WHEREAS, it is hereby determined that there are special circumstances affecting said property such that the strict application of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; that the waiver is necessa'ry' for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property owners, and WHEREAS, the purpose of.said subdivision is to divide Lot 3, Block 3, Shadywood Point and add each piece to the abutting properties on either side. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C!TY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: )) The request of Wayn~ and Sherry Byrd for the waiver from the provisions Of Section 22.00 of the City Code and the request to subdivide property of less than five acres, described as PID #13-117r24 11 O123, is hereby granted to permit division of the following property in the following manner: PARCEL "A" - Parcel adjoining Lot 2. That part of Lot 3, Block 3, Shadywood Point, :lying Northwesterly of the following-described line: Commencing at the mo~t Westerly corner of said lot; thence South- easterly along the Southwesterly line of said lot a distance of'19.72 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting left 92°55' to the Northeasterly line of said lot, and there ending. This parc.el to be combined'with PID #13-117-24-11-OOO1 in the name of B. H. Anderson. PARCEL "B" - That part of Lots'3 and 4, Block 3, Shadywood Point, lying Northwesterly of a ·llne described as follows: Commencing at the most Southerly corner of said Lot 3; thence Northwesterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 10.5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting right 92°51' to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, and lying Southeasterly of the following described llne: Commencing at the most Westerly corner of said Lot 3; thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 19.72 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting left 92°55' to the NortheastErly line of said lot, and there ending. This parcel to be combined.with PID #13-117-24 11 O123. 2) That any'and all deficiencies be paid in full or waivers signed on parcels due to subdivisions. 3) It is. determined th~ the foregoing division will constitute a desirable and stable community development and is in harmony with adjacent properties. 4) The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the applicant for f-iling in the office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of this City. A motion for the adoption of.the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Charon and upon vote being taken thereon; the following voted in favor thereof: Charon, Swenson,'Ulrlck and Lindlan, the.following voted against the same: none, with Counci)member Polston absent;.whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Manager~ Leighton Lindlan/fc Mayor t~s t: City Mananger VA,". 10.5 t'...,' t : :.... '.x~:.:'~' ...,' ~../'tru:ir~,' nj' %1,.: lin:' 92°fL' t.. ~:.,: '.~.:.~,..-,.~r.t..-[:, tlr,,. ~.? said ~t ~., (_~) tats '> ,,rd 4 ,:~,.a:);. thr, t l.art of ~:,i.,4. lois I)'i::,' the Soutn-~st,.;r..y Lit,. ~..~ said Lo~ ~ a 01:,1~:;,-~. the line h.:lr,:' :~;~...',--ib,.'d; th,~nee dal'lsettn~ rl,.'h% 92°;1' t.,'- th.: N~rthc..,,-'%urk.. L'..n,...f ::a£d Let 4, :,n'; tl,,',r,~ enct!r.g, Biork ~..~haJluaod Point, Scale: l" l~%e : 9-17-80 43~/ dated RESOLUTION NO. 82- Proposed Action Case No. 82-145 RESOLUTION WAIVING REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING THE .FINAL SUBDIVISION - PART OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 3, SHADYWOOD POINT WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision requirements contained in Section 22.00 of the City Code has been filed with the City of Mound, and WHEREAS, said request for a waiver has been reviewed by the_~lanning Commission' and the City Council, and WHEREAS, it is hereby determined that there are special circumstances affecting said' property such that the strict application of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; that the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property owners, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND: The request of Wayne Byrd for the waiver from the provisions of Section 22.00 of the City Code and the request to subdivide property of less than five acres is hereby granted to permit division of the following property in the following manner: A. Presently described as: That part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Shadywood Point, lying Northwesterly of a llne described.as follows: Commencing at the most Southerly corner of said Lot 3; thence Northwesterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of IO.5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting right 92°51' to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, and lying Southeasterly of. the following described line: Commencing at the most Westerly corner of said Lot 3; thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 19.72 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting left 92°55' to the Northeasterly line of said lot, and there ending. PID 13-117-24 11 O123; Lot 2 & that part of Lots 3 and 4 lying Northwesterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the most Southerly corner of said Lot 3; thence Northwesterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 3 a dis- tance of 10.5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting right 92°51'' to the Northeasterly llne of said Lot 4, and there ending, Block 3, Shadywood Point· PID 13-117-24 11 O001 To be combined as: That part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Shadywood Point,-lying Northwesterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the most Southerly corn' of said Lot 3; thence Northwesterly along the Southwesterly line of sa Lot 3 a distance of 10.5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting right 92o51' to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, and lying Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Westerly corner of said Lot 3; Case No. 82-145 thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 19.72 feet to the point of b~ginning of the llne to be described; thence deflecting left 92°55' to the Northeasterly line of said lot, and there ending. Lots 3 and 4 except that part of said lots lying Northwesterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the most Southerly corner of said Lot 3; thence Northwesterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 3'a distance of 10.5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting right 92°51' to the North- easterly line of said Lot 4, and there ending, Block 3, Shadywood Point. The combination of a formerly.divided lot will once again create a future building site.exceeding the 6,000 square foot minimum lot slze for the R-2 Zoning District '-~t~ c ~wid2~ of ~ ' · f It is determined that the foregoing division will constitute a desirable and stable community development and is in harmony with adjacent properties. The City Clerk is authorized to.deliver'a certified copy of this resolution to the applicant for filing in the Office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to Show com- pliance with the subdivision regulations of this City. This sub- division shall be filed within 180 days of the adoptiOn date of this resolution. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission Agenda of October 18, 1982. Board of Appeals Case No. 82-146 Legal Description as set for in final plat Request: Final Plat Approval Zoning District: R-1 Applicant Newhouse Builders Addition Ron Gehring 3215 Charles Lane, Mound Phone: 472-3557 The applicant is requesting final plat approval for the plat known as "Newhouse Addition". The items listed on Resolution No. 81-82 have been accomplished and that an $],800 bond or cash be on deposit to assure removal of the existing structure within 90 days on Lot 4 plus a $1,O00 Escrow Fund payment has been made to cover engineering, legal and administrative expense. A check llst is attached to assure all necessary items have been accomplished along with title opinion letter dated June 1, 1981 from Curt Pearson, City Attorney, and May 13 and 15, 1981 letters from Lyle Swanson, City Engineer. Recommend: As the preliminary approval was given by the former City Staff members, I feel from thei. r recommendations, all is in order. The preliminary plat resolution did not state the developer should only have one year to apply for final approval. Jan Bertrand Building Official Case No. 82-146 Final Plat Approval-for Newhouse Builders Addition Lot 54 and the We'st 25 feet of Lot 46, Auditor's Subdivision 168. Ron Gehring was present. : The Building Inspector explained that applicant i's requesting final plat approval for Newhouse Builders Addition. Resolution 81-82 giving preliminary approval stipulated 9 items that had to be complied with. All items have been completed except for the bonding amounts. Discussed how to be sure Park Dedication Fee would be collected and also discussed bonding for the boulevard improvements. On Item 5 (boulevard improvement), Gehring asked if he couldn't break up an amount per lot ($200) and establish an eSCrOW fund for this improvement; when each lot were completed, he would get a refund. The City Manager thought one escrow fund for Items 4, 5 and 8 could be establlshed in lieu of the bonds. O'Donnell moved a motion to recommend final plat approval be granted with one escrow fund for Items 4 ($1,800.), 5{$200 per lot or $1,600.) and 8 ($1,000.). Weiland seconded the motion and moved an amendment to motion that a file be set up so that the Park Dedication fees are kept track of. Amendment seconded by O'Donnell. The vote on the amendment was unanimously in favor. The vote on the motion as amended was unanimously in favor. ~LICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE OWNER PLAT PARCEL t Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: ZONING ,,4-/ To be divided as follows: (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. Reason: From Square feet TO Square feet TEL. NO. This application must be signed b~/y all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: .OK'IG ./ _ ~.COM i~ ER cuE-~ -Bi:VD:' t : .:1"'~000 IXZ. 70 5 E~ST 8 Polston mow-d thc. followlnn re~olut'io~., RESOLUTION NO. 81-82 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF NEWHOUSE BUILDERS ADDITION SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, by Resolution 81-50 adopted February 10, 1981, the Council provided for a public he~ring to be held on March 10, 1981 regarding the subdivision of land on the 2700 Block on Grove Lane, subdivision to be known as the "Newhouse Builders Addition". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That.the preliminary plat be approved for Newhouse Builders Addition subdivision with the following stipulations: That Lot 8 front and have agress on the cul-de-sac and that 30 foot setback be maintained from both the cul-de-sac and 'County Road 110; and that portion of unopened Grove Lane be considered the side yard with a 10 foot setback required. ~ 2. That a drainage plan be submitted for approval by the City Engineer insuring that drainage will be to the right-of-way on Grove Lane. ~.....3. That a 10 foot utility easement be maintained on all properties. ~4. That the existing structure on Lot 4 either be removed or brought up to code within two years. An appropriate bond required in the amount of 150% of the co~t of removing the building as determined by the City Engineer.~ J,~0~) ~- 5. That the 10 foot right-of-way between the street edge and lines be properly improved. the lot ~-. 6. A park dedication fee of SS,000.OO, which is $625.00 per lot, be given as the building permits are taken out. J/7. A Title Opinion be furnished the City Attorney. Z~ 8. An Escrow Fund in the amount of $1,000.00 be established to cover engineering, legal and administrative expense. preliminary plan be placed with this resolution showing the above. A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council-' member 5wenson and upon vote being taken thereon; the following voted in favor there- of.; Charon, Lindlan, Polston, Swenson and Ulrick, the following voted against the same; none, whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. S/Leighton Lindlan I Mayor ,2377 LAW WURST, CARROLL & PEARSON I~*1~. FIR..~T BANK PLACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 June 1, 1981 TELEPHONE Ms. Marge Stutsman Acting City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Newhouse Builders Addition Dear Marge: I am enclosing herewith a title opinion from Roger W. Reed to the City of Mound for the lands being platted as Newhouse Builders Addition. I am sending a copy to you and a copy to Lyle Swanson and along with Lyle's copy I am sending copies of the two easements referred to as Exhibits A and B in the opinion° I am asking Lyle to compare those easements against the easements as shown on the plat to be sure that the dedication is consistent with what the City curyently owns or has a right to use. The plat should be signed by Anthony L. Wick, Beatrice R. Wick, Ronald S. Gehring and Marlene J. Gehring. As soon as Lyle has signed off on the easement you and the Mayor can execute the plat for recording. I am assuming that all bonding items and things which are Lyle's responsibility have been taken care ofo Very truly yours,- Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney CAP:ms Enclosure cc: Mr. Lyle Swanson · - . cCOMBS'" -KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS !,~ LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS o Reply To: 12800 Indu~ri.l P, rk BDul~vard Plymouth, Minnesot~ 55441 (612) 559-3700 Hay 13, 1981 Ms. Marge Stutsman Acting City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound Newhouse Builders Addition Job ~2113 Dear Ms. Stutsman: As requested we have calculated the bond amount for the Newhouse Builders Addtion. 1) 150% of the cost of removing the building: $1800 2) 150% of the cost of boulevard improvements: $1500 If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Swanson, P.E. LS:bb Minneapolis- Hutchinson- Alexandria- Eagan printed on recycled 13a,oer ... COMBS-KNUTSON AS OCI NC. ~~ CONSUL?INGENGINEER$.LANDSURVEYORS E PLANNERS Reply To: 32800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 May 15, 19al Ms. Marjorie Stutsman Acting'City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound Newhouse Builders Addition Grading and Drainage Plan Job ~2113 Dear Ms. Stutsman, We have reviewed the~grading and drainage plan for the Newhouse Builders Addition and recommend acceptance of the plan. Sincerely, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:bb Minneapolis- Hutchinson- Alexandria- Eagan I~inted on recycted pK)er Councilmember moved the follewing resolution. Proposed Action RESOLUTION No. 82- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF NEWHOUSE BUILDERS ADDITION SUBDIVISION Planning Commission File 82-146 WHEREAS, the final plat of Newhouse Builders. Addition has been submitted in the manner required for platting of land under the City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 22.00 and'under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and. WHEREAS, said p]at is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the .laws-of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the CLty of Mound, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND: A. Plat approval request 82-146, Newhouse Builders Addition Subdivision, is approved upon compliance with the following requirements: lo Per final plat "Exhibit A". 2. Per requirements set out in Resolution 8i-82, or as subsequently amended by motion, approving the preliminary plat of Newhouse Builders , J...~. ~ Addition. Escrow fund to be established in the amount'of $4,400.00. ~['~Y(~ ~__~625.00Park Dedicat.ion Fee be paid per lot as building permits are obtainec~ -~,~ Jrw~.~,~,~at the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified coPy of this ~' ,'7'4~,:~..x~w~esolution to the above named owners and subdividers after completion of 0~,,.~ requirements, for thei'r use as .required by M.S.A. 462.358. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certifi- cate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. D. This final plat shall be filed and recorded within 60 days of the date of the signing of the hardshells by the Mayor and City Manager in accordance with Section 22.00 of the City Code and shall be recorded within 180 days of the adOption date of this Resolution wi.th one copy being filed with the City-of Mound. BE .IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Manager shall be conc)usive showing of proper compliance there- with by the subdivider and City Officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with M.S.A. 462 and the Ordinance of the City. A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon; the following voted in favor thereof: the fo)lowing voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. AtteRt: Citv Clerk Mayor CiTY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning. Commission Agenda of October 18, 1~82. Board of Appeals Case No. 82-147 Location: 3143 Devon Lane Legal Description: Lots 11, 12 & 13, Block 4, Arden Request: Setback Variance Zoning District: R-1 Applicant Nichol & Lucille Bryce 3143 Devon Lane, Mound Phone: 472-1772 The applicant is requesting to build an attached 18 foot by 22 foot garage, 11.3 to 14.5 feet from the front lot line and 18 feet from the side lot line. The Zoning Ordinance states that on a corner lot, the required 30 foot setback be maintained from both right-of-ways. The present house setback is 10 feet from Devon Lane and 35 feet~ from Canterbury Road; the side and rear yard set- backs are conforming. The lot area is approximately 9,590 square feet which is 410 square feet less than the required 10,000 square feet. Recommend: In years past, the owners have converted a tuckunder garage to living area. Recently, a retaining wall was placed along the street. The sewer and water lines enter the building from the rear of the house. There are several maple trees along the house to the East side. The proposed garage would be approximately 45 feet from the intersection of Canterbury an~ Devon; although it would be in front of the neigh- bor's building line. Abutting neighbor has been notified of request and a statement ~rom them is attached. The roof line of the existing structure would have to be altered (reversed) to allow a garage to be added alongside. In addition, to allow an 8 foot sideyard, the garage would be 15 feet wide to match the width of the "L" shape of the present structure. Jan Bertrand Building Official Case No.'82-147 Setback variance f~r attached garage, 3143 Devon Lane Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 4, Arden Mr. & Mrs. Nichol Bryce were present. The request is to build an 18' X 22' attached garage ll.3 to 14.5 feet from the front lot line. This is a corner lot with 30 foot setback required from both r.ight-of-ways. Present house is 10 feet from Devon Lane and 35 feet~ from Can- terbury Road. Weiland moved and Vargo seconded a motion to approve the setback variance for the garage with the stipulation that the car entrance to the garage doors be on the Devon side. The vote was unanimously in favor. MOUND Street Address of Property CITY OF MOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING CbMMISSION (Please type the following information) ApPlication No..~-Zy? Fee Paid $35.00 2. Legal Description of Property: Lot., //7 / ~ / Addition Arden Date .Filed ]0-12-82 Owner's Name Address ~/.~_~ /~ VOh ' ~a n~, / 3 ,lock PID No. 24-117-24 44 0040 Day Phone No.. d: 4. App1 icant (if other than owner): Name Day Phone No. Address 5. Type of Request: Variance ( ) ConditiOnal Use Permit Zoning Interpretation & Review Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. *If other, specify: ( ) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other ~, Present Zoning District R-1 7. Existing Use(s) of Property y~- ~ 8o Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? /4('~) If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all 'of the above statements and the statements contained i'n any required papers oc plans to be submitted herewith a're true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the' purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such required y la~ ~ ~%~/0 Signature of Applicant. ~-~":~,,~'~(~ ~..~f~_R~ . Date 10-'12-82 Planning Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date Request for Zoning Variance Procedure (2) '' .D. Location of: Signs, easements~ underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction ..F. 'Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. Case !!!, Request for a Zoning Variance A. All Information below, a site plan, as described In Part !1, and general application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled· B. Does the present use of the prop,try'conform to ~1 use regulations for the zone district In which it is located? Yes · If "no", specify ea~M nOn-conforming use: / Bo the existing'structures comply, with all area~height.and bulk.regulations for the zone district in'which i't is.located? Yes ( Y'~ No' (~' If ~'no", spec[fy'each non-conforming use: Which uni'q~e physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the.uses.permitted in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow (.) Topography (') Soil ( ) Too. small ( ) Drainage.. ( .) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow .( ) Shape' ( ) 'Other: Specify: Was the hardship described aboVe'created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after 'the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes (.) No '(~) If yes, explain: l- Was the hardship created by'any 'other man-made change', such as the~- tion of a road? Yes (~) No ( ) If yes, explain: -~1/~. ..... Are the conditions of hardship for'which:you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (~) No ( ) If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? H..What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to'property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? NOA3CI. o ¢* I ~0 '!~01 ~IT ~ PLA, kJ . zs-Et-ot ~ ~8-EL-OL --' aUe'l ,50A~O ~t£ -- Councilmember moved the following resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 82- Proposed Action Case No. 82-147 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION T0 APPROVE THE FRONT YARD VARIANCE AS REQUESTED FOR LOTS 11, 12 & 13, BLOCK 4, ARDEN WHEREAS, the owner of property described as Lots ll, 12 and 13, Block 4, Arden has applied for a 18.7 foot front yard variance and a 20 foot front yard variance for the existing house to allow a garage to be placed 18.7 feet to the Canterbury Road. property line, and. WHEREAS, the .City Code requires a home to.be 30 feet from both property lines on a corner lot and the present house is 10 feet; the addition of the 18' X 22' garage would be.ll.3 to 14.5 feet from the front property line with the garage entrance facing east, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this variance due to the hardship of topography and preservation of the trees on the west side, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT' RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MN.: That the Council does hereby concur with the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the front yard variance of 18.7 feet and I0 feet as requested - Lots. 11, 12 and 13, Block 4, Arden '~} F'r JU, 2 T 1982 FEE OWNER APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND LAND FEE $ ?._~', 00, PLAT PARCEL ~zt oo $~. Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: · /z~r 3 AND '3."-. E,L~c~, 1, W0aPLAk~O: f'olUT ¢. Helq~e Pt~ (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMI~ION RECOMMENDATION: Granting the with the stipulation that the recommendations 0fficia] be complied with. variance and subdivision request of the Engineer and of the Building <C RECEIVED1 5 19S2 McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS October 14, 1982 Reply l'o: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Ms. 3an Bertrand Building Inspector City of Mound 5341May~ood Road Mound, ~ 55364 Subject: Ronald Pelarski Property Lots 4 and 21 and South 10' of Lots 3 and 22, Block 7, Woodland Point File #2113, General Dear gan: After discussing the problem of the extension of Bluebird Lane with Oon Elam, we have decided on the following recommendations. One unit charge of $1,170.90 from the 1978 street improvements should be charged against Lots 4 and 21. The responsiblity of ex~ending the bituminous paving in Bluebird Lane to adequately serve the'building site ~ould belong to the developer. Concrete curb and gutter ~ould not be required, but the new paving in the right-of-way must meet the City standards of 5" of bituminous. The developer be required to furnish a revised plan showing the exist- lng and proposed elevations of the area to be paved within the right-of-way. If you need additional information or have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, MoCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INCo OC:sj printed on recycled September 7, 1~)82 CouncilmemJ~er Ulrick moved the following resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 82-235 RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF LOTS ~ & 22, BLOCK WOODLAND POINT~ .WITH STIPULATIONS WHEREAS, WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision requirements contained in Section 22.00 of the CityCode has been filed with the City'of Mound, and said request for'a waiver has.been reviewed by'the Planning Commission and City Council, and " WHEREAS, WHEREAS, It-.is hereby'determined thatl'there are speclalcircumstances affecting said property such that the strict'application of the ordinance.would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of 'hi.s land;that the waiver is necessary for the preservation and .enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver will not be detrimental to the public We)fare or injurious to the other property.owners,..and mM the purpose of said subdi, vis~on.is to create'two parcels containing ll,3~7~.and 8,253: in an area where the ordinance requires6OOO.square feet area for R-2 District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE-CITY COUNCIL. OF ~ME CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: The request of GOrdon P. and Jeanne E. Swensen for the waiver from the provisions of Section 22.00 of the City Code and the request to subdivide property df less than.five acres, described as PID # 13-ll7-24 12 0130, is hereby granted preliminary approval and the lO feet subdivided, to beadded to PID #13~llT-2q 12 0131 & #13-117-2~ 21 0082 (division in the following manner): PARCEL "A"- ". (PID #13-117-24 12 0131 & #13-117-24'21 0082) That part of Lots 3 and 22~..Block 7, Woodland Point lying Southerly of a )ina drawn parallel to and 10 feet 'Northerly at right angles' from the South line of said Lots.-Also Lots 4 and 2'1,. Block'7, Woodland Point. · ...... PARCEL "B"- (PID #13-117-24 12 0130) That part of Lots 3 and 22, Block 7, Woodland Point lying Northerly of a line drawn parallel to and'10 feet northerly, at right ahgles from the South line of said lots. Also lots 2 & 23, Block 7, Woodland Point. B. Preliminary subdivision is approved upon compliance with the following requirements: New surveys be submitted with the elevations shown as required by our City Engineer, including proposed utility connections and the monuments to be reset. September 7, 1982 Floodproofing is.to be accomplished as per code.for the utility connections. City Attorney to review.the descriptions of the drainage easement shown on the survey. The ~ew building site pay or be assessed the street' unit charge ($1.,1.70.~0) plus the front footage of $7.B5 + .o8 a square foot from the'l~78 street assessment. 5. The plans need to indicate how the street extension will be · ~andled and the proposed elevations of same'~~ Signatures.-by all the owners of the property be submitted, Failure on. the part of the petitioner to submit a final Plat. of the lot-split per Section 22.13 within one year from the date of this'approval .shall deem the preliminary approval null and void, unless a written extension is applied for and approved. A motion for the adoption of .the forego|.ng, lr~Solution was.duly seconded by Coun. cilmember Pols'ton and upon vote being taken .thereon; the following voted in favor thereof: Charon, Polston, Swens0n, Ulrick and'Llndlan; the following voted against, the same: none; whereupon.~aid resolution was decla~led passed .. and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested b'y the City Clerk'. . , Mayor At-test: City Clerk Case No. 82-139 Final Subdivision Approval, 1609 Bluebird Lane Lots 2, 23, 4, 2], 3 and 22, Block 7, Woodland Point Rona]d Pelarski was present. The Building Inspector reviewed Resolution 82-235 including the requirements for final subdivision appFoval. A permanent easement for utility purposes has been signed and sent to the Attorney. A letter from the City Engineer recommends changes which apply to Items 4 and 5 of the Resolution; changes are: 1. Unit charge of $1,170.90 from the 1978 street improvements should be charged against Lots 4 and 21. 2.' The responsibility of extending the bituminous paving in Bluebird Lane to adequately serve the building site would b~long to the developer. Concrete. curb and gutter would not be required, but the new paving in the'right-of-way'must meet the City standards of 5" of bituminous. 3. The developer be required to. furnish a revised plan showing the exist- ing and.proposed elevations .of. the area to be paved within the right- of-way. Vargo moved and Stannard'seconded a motion to approve the final subdivision. The vote was unanimousl:¥.in favor. Proposed Action Case No. 82-139 ~ESOLUTION NO. 82- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL SUBDIVISION FOR LOTS 2, 23, 4, 21, 3 AND 22, BLOCK 7, WOOD- LAND POINT WHEREAS, the final subdlvision of.Lots 2, 23, 4, 21, 3 and 22, Block 7, Woodland Point,'has been submitted in the manner required for platting of land under the City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 22.00 and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly .had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said subdivision is consistent with the City plan ;~d the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Mound, NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: Ae Preliminary approval request # 82-139, Ron Pelarskl and Gordon P. and Jeanne Swenson, is approved upon compliance with the following require- ments: De One unit charge'of $1,170.90 from the street improvement be charged against Lots 4. and 21, Block 7, Woodland Point Responsibility of extending the bituminous paving on Bluebird Lane to adequately serve the building site will belong to the developer. Concrete curb and gutter will not be required, but new paving in the right-of-way must.meet City standards of 5 inch bituminous. 3. The developer, be required to fubnish a revised plan showing existing and ~proposed'elevations of the area to be paved within the right-of-way'. 4. City Attorney is to approve the Title and drainage easement to be dedicated across, the east 40 feet of said Lot 4 and south 1-0 feet of Lot 3, Block 7, Woodland Point That the City Clerk is .hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution.to'the above.named .owners and subdividers after completion of requirements, for their use as required by M.S.A. 462.358. That by Resolution.82-235, it was determined that there are special circumstances affecting said property and that a waiver was granted under City Code Section 22~00. This final subdivision shall be filed and recorded within 180days of the date of the adoption of this resolution in the Office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepln County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of this City. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission .Agenda of October 18, 1982. Board'of Appeals Case No. ~2-1'48" Location: Shoreline Boulevard & Cypress Lane Legal Description: Lots 35 and 37, Auditors Subdivision 170 and Block 4, Shirley Hills Unit F Request: Conceptual Plan Review Zoning District: B-1 Applicant The Streetcar Boat Center, Inc. M.L."Buzz" Sycks, Pres. 2305 Commerce Boulevard Phone: 472-1060 or 472-4833 I have attached to this memorandum several letters pertaining to the develop- ment of the project known as the Streetcar Boat Shopping Center. The applicant would like the Planning Commission to review their plans and concepts for a timely phasing of the project's development. Jan Bertrand Building Official JB/ms CITY of MOUND October 20, 1982 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER RE: STREETCAR BOAT SHOPPING CENTER Included in the packet are Memo's from the Building Inspector and the City Planner. Their comments tend to be pretty specific, so I will seek to focus on what I think are some of the planning/philosophical dilemmas this proposal raises. My first question;is the Lost Lake Area ~est used as a shopping center, or as a high rise housing project, or a park nature area? No one has really ever defined what they think the site's long-term use should be. In fact, we have never made any kind of public pronouncement that the City is now thru with the land and it is ready to be given back to the Catholic Church. Now we have a request, that. has been approved by the Planning Commission, to approve the developer's'"concept plan" and approve reconveying this land back to the Catholic Church so they can sell it to the developers for, I have heard, $150,0OO. Without these two approvals, the developers say the project cannot go forward. What options does that leave the City with? None! To be known as the City Council who did not approve a shopping center in Mound would hardly be a claim to fame that any of us would want° But to not have any options is not, to me, attractive either. Although the site has not been managed or maintained very well over the past several years (something I am dealing with now) I really do think the site has some very definite value to the City and I strongly feel we should be compensated for that value. The impact upon the residential neighborhoods of the City if this location had not been available during the street improvement projects would have been significant. Where else could we have put several hundred truck loads of snow (last year)? I think the site is worth at least $50,000 to the City, especially in light of the Church receiving $150,000 for basically doing nothing with the site over the past twenty plus years. At least the $50,000 could go to helping the City acquire a replacement site and thus help all of us resolve our Pub'lic Works storage problem. Page 2 Streetcar Boat Shopping Center October 20, 1982 My next question is. How can we give any kind of conceptual approval to such a major development that has no committed tenants and no committed financing? In every other development the problem is not the City's. In this case, the developers are saying that they cannot get those tenants or'committed financing without the City providing some sort of blind, beforehand approval of the project. What happens if another development (the one located by Super Valu) comes forward with tight financial committments, but won't go forward unless they are selected over the Lost Lake development? Since there is a very real possibility of this happening, how can we decide between the two projects without creating one of the greatest controversies the City has had in recent years? Aren't we, by giving conceptual approval, telling people that this is a high priority project and if local businesses want to get in on the new center they should be contacting the Streetcar Center developers? In my meetings with Super Valu, Snyder's, Mound State Bank and the Medical Center, they are saying that they want to leave their options open and not be forced into one location over the other until certain cost and location questions are resolved. Who will do the resolving, the .City.' or the developers? With the Lost Lake site, it looks like it will be the City as far as determining the location. In every development like this that I am familiar with, I have alwaYs seen a local business that: is pushing the proposal and will benefit from it. The developers say if the local businesses don't want to move to the Lost Lake site then they are prepared to recruit other tenants who will bring new businesses to Mound. I would feel alot better about this if letters or other tentative committments were available from the developers out- lining who specifically was willing to commit to Mound and under what terms. Somehow, I think we owe something to the existing Downtown Business District to help insure its continued viability and to minimize that which could threaten it. My last comment relates to benefits. Who benefits from this proposal and how? Obviously the City through a higher tax base and the utilization of a former dump site. But, let's look beyond that. There is no debate that the City's tax base will increase substantially by this multi-million dollar development. In fact one memeber of the development team suggested that total annual property taxes to be paid may exceed $200,000. That is great, but that by itself should not be the reason to approve an otherwise questionable project, The actual impacts, it seems, are: Page 3 Streetcar Boat Shopping Center October 20, 1982 A. The City, by State Law, cannot increase it's tax levy by more than 8% per year. Thus any project no matter how large cannot help that situation and won't provide the City or anyone else a sudden tax windfall. What it may mean is an increase in the City's assessed value and thus a resulting spread of the tax base across the City. So the most obvious benefactors would be the individual taxpayers. This, of course, is great and could help continue our efforts started in 1983, but there is also another benefactor. That is all the taxing districts in the Seven County Metro Area that fall under the Fiscal Disparities'Act. What happens is that the assessed value from a development like this goes into a Metro pool and as our contribution to that pool grows faster than say someone else, they gain the benefit. All this is much to lengthy to get into in this Memo, but the tax benefits have some qualifications to them° B. Next the Downtown benefit. I thought I had received the consensus that any downtown area development project should be used to help finance ~he public beautification program that has been proposed by the Downtown Advisory Committee. To do t~at will require the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District. The problem is that even though I have suggested this and asked Rob to draw up the parameters of such a program, the developers wish to provide their own financing and not utilize any public renewal programs. This makes it very simple for me, but we lose our chance to develop an increment (which would be great on vacant land) and could be used to improve the Lost Lake Channel and Marina without using taxpayers money. The tax increment was something I had hoped would be possible. Needless to say the downtown beautification plan isn't impacted at all. C. Finally, I fear that a shopping center, as proposed, without the accompanying waters edge improvements could result in the creation of a wall along Lost Lake, thus cutting off the view of Lost Lake as I guess the Marina Shopping Center did along that area. It seems to me we should be playing up the Lake rather than blocking it off. As you can tell the project frustrates me. I hardly like being a stick in the mud. I realize the overwhelming public/political support for this project and its pressure to move everything ahead as quickly as possible. If you decide to do that I will understand and I am prepared to strongly support your decision. In conclusion, at least we are turning over the site clean and almost clear. I would suggest a couple of things: 1. We holda public hearing on the question of reconveying the land back to the Catholic Church. This is not required legally but at least we would get some feedback on the proposal. We should give Curt the time to finish his legal work on the land we own in Lost Lake and whatever legal questions there are. JE:fc Case No, 82-148 · The Streetcar Boat Center, Inc. came to the Planning Commission meeting October 18, l~82. for conceptual approval of the plans for a shopping center in the Lost Lake area (Lots 35 and 37, Auditors Subdivision 170 and Block 4, Shirley Hills_Unit Fi. o Case No. 82-148 Concept Plan Review for The Street Car Boat Center, Inco Lots 35 and 37, Auditors Subd. 170 and Block 4, Shirley Hill.s. Un|t F M.L."Buzz" Sycks, Attorney Bill Koenig and Architect Kaye Westerlund were present. Commissioner S'tannard stated that he had gotten interested and involved in this project and that he would abstain from action taken on this item. .. M. L. Sycks, President of. the Street Car Boat'Center presented a. plan that he has been working on for three years for the'development of the Lost Lake area for a shopping center. The request is for conceptual and site approval. Mr. Sycks introduced his associates who are working with him on this project--Bill Koenig, Attorney; Kaye Westerlund, Architect and Bud Stannard., Construction Specialist. Commissioner Liz Jensen arrivedL During discussion, it was brought out that part of the project consisted o~ a new Super.America. Station to be constructed on the corner of Cypress Lane and Shoreline Boulevard. Metro Station is to' be d~molished and the Super America at the present location w|)l be closed. Options for ~urchase of land have been obtained from the Tonka Corporation, Our Lady of the Lake Church and Croix Oil Company. 'The project will be privately funded. They have had a financial feasibility study run on whether.it is possible to make any money. Center is to be developed in two phases. The restaurant will be phase 2, as getting permits and licensing would have to be done by the restaurant owner. Various questions were answered by the Street Car Boat Center officials.. Weiland moved and O'Oonnell seconded a motion to give conceptual approval of the Street Car Boat Center, Inc. plans for shopping center. Stannard abstained and all others voted in favor. n ~ o ~ 2 ;"' WILSHIRE BLVD '-, ,. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA (612) 472-! September 30, 1982' TO: Jon Elam; City Manager FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official SUBJECT: Check list for Shopping Center Development I am listing what I feel should be the required approvals and informa- tion necessary to .bring a site plan request before the. Planning Commis- sion for the Shoppi.ng Center at Lost Lake: Site Plan to include: 'A. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and 'proposed: Lot(s), building(s), driveway(s)/street access, off-street parking, and utilities. Existing and proposed elevations.' .. Bo Distance between: 1. Building and.front, side and rear lot lines; .2. 'Principal building'and accessory buildings; 3. Principal building and principal buildings, or adjacent lots ' D. Locations of: Signs, easements, underground'utilities, sprinkler lines, refuse, storage, any screening and lighting. E. Engineer to sign site plan F. Submit soil reports Square footage of lot, parking areas, etc. Legal description of site. I. Approvals and/or applications filed with various regulatory agencies: 1. Hennepin Cou'nty Department of Transportation 2. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 3. HennePin County Department of.Health (restaurants) f would like to review any submitted plans with the City Engineer, Attorney, Planner and Fire Chief before a final site plan would be approved. C!TY of. MOUND MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jon Elam, City Manager : Rob Chelseth, City Planner October 4, 1982 Preliminary Comments on Street Car Boat Shopping Center Proposal It is my understanding that'the City.~of Mound has been asked to respond to a project concept developed by T~e Builders Studio, Inc. in September of 1982. The City's response must take into account the fact it may play a dual role in the development proposal; a participant, offering approvals of land needed to assemble the site; and, a review authority, insuring the proposal meets.State and Local regulations. Although both roles are played simultaneously, it i's valuable to segre- gate the interests of each.for.exploratory analysis. Regarding Mound's role as a participant, the City may ask itself if it considers this proposal desirable from a development pol.icy standpoint. In this case, review of the comprehensive plan and land use development policies may offer guidance. At the same time, the'City shou.ld explore the financial merits of any proposal; how much is the City being asked to give up, and what it is receiv.ing in return? As part of these negotiations, the City Should ask for information on the development plans, including detailed design information, time schedules on the development, leasing agreements with tenants, and other sure signs of the commitments necessary to make the project go. Finally,' as in any joint venture, the City may wish to know more'about its "partners"; their past development experiences, ex- pertise and financial backing.. The other Principal rol.e Mound plays involves 'the application of Local and State regulations, in going from the'general.to the .specific, we begin with State ~egulati.ons of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. The EQB requires an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) in cities of the 4th class (Mound) that do not state approved shoreland regulations for developments over 20,000 square feet in size, that are located within 1,000 feet of a lake shoreline. As proposed, this develop- ment appears to be greater,than 1,O00 feet from the shorelines of Lake Minnetonka and Langdon Lake. However, given its close proximity to a DNR identified wetland area, the necessity of preparing an EAW will h~ve to be checked with both the EQB and DNR before the local review process begins. The'final determination can only be made after the spe- cific sites of construction work and impacts are determined. In terms of local land use controls, the principal regulations are con- tained in the Mound City Zoning Ordinance. The City Building Official MEMORANDUM - Preliminary. Comments on Street Car Boa~ Shopping Center Proposal - Page~2 has summarized many of the aPPlicable provisions (Memo dated: 9/30/82). What is important here is the sequence in Which information is provided. At this time, Mound'should be looking for several items of information: 1. A parcel map showing the lots involved, current ownership, along with an explanation of the status of land needed for the project site. The City is seeking some form of assurance that the developers will control the entire site, and complete the project as proposed. 2. A development plan showing the timing and phasing of the project, unless the entire project will be constructed at once. If portions of the project are optional,.what will become of the area of the project if not fully completed as planned? 3. Commitments for participation and financial support for the project. Althou.gh these should be as firm as possible, it is understood they may have contingencies in them (e.g. the transaction.of Mound's deed to a parcel of land back to the Church'). 4. More.specific site planning work (see Building Official's memo), along with the assurances from State (EQB, DNR), County (Highway Department), special agencies (Watershed District) and others re- garding the need and requirements for any approvals they must grant. As usual, it can be Stressed that the City of Mound is eager and willing to assist private business in adv@n¢:i~ng proposals for expanding our local economy.: At 'the same time, we feel a great deal of emphasis must be placed on the des!gn:and content of the project, so that we will be. pleased with the results, which we will have to live with for many years to come. Rob Chel§eth City Planner RC/ms ~T CJTY ,1, f I..I TT L E_ C,¥P F, E 55 LANE' N OI%TN~ ~ANI~, [=ACILITy -- %o~000 '~.F. - Gr,,05~ ~ :STATIOk,I, ,p^CILITy ~- '3B=-5o 5,/=. I I I I I / ~ I I I { \ I I I I 'i / I .:. .......... (._ I · : " / / / ,, I ,~h / ! / ! I / October 21, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Enclosed is the very preliminary plan I had Rob develop on the Town Square Proposal. It should give some general 'background as to what would be involved in a tax increment project. I received this request, to be placed on the Agenda, following the completion of my Memo on the Streetcar Shopping Center. I have not had a chance to review their plans and they are nOt asking for concept approval. They are just providing the Council with the necessary infor- mation to request the authorization of the tax increment process. JE:fc ) 'PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR MOUND DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT * LOCATION: an area between 7.5 and 8 acres in size, bounder~ on the west by Commerce Blvd, the south by the Burlington Northern Railroad, the east by Belmont Lane, and the north by]~he rear property line of those parcels fronting on the north side of Lynwood Blvd (approximately 190' north of Lynwood. Btvd). LAFAYE~4 1 L PARK PAINT OF' LOT ~2 CHURCH 29'i, l I * RELOCATION COSTS Relocation costs will vary greatly depending on the decisions of individual owners. Those desiring to relocate their place of business or residence are eligible for state mandated amounts of compensation. The formulas are different for 'residences and businesses, and basically involve payment of moving Costs and some expenses as'sociated with changing your location of business or purchasing replacement housing. A waiver of relocation costs may be obtained from those businesses who are planning to relocate within the new development, lowering the overall expense to some degree. A third option may be that some businesses do not wish to relocate in Mound, and may request a "payment in lieu" of moving (up to $10,000). Given the fact that Mound probably wishes to keep every business it has, the emphasis will likely be on moving and relocation costs. * DEMOLITION All existing structures on the site must be demolished and cleared, or removed from the area. Estimates may be obtained for this work from the city engineer, or possibly knowledgeable city maintenance personnel, who ould assist]in this work. A rough working range for these costs would be 100,000 to $150,000. * SITE IMPROVEMENT These are basically the costs associated with bringing Public utilities onto the site (sewer, water, electric, gas, etc.) as well as miscellaneous earth work and planting. - * GENERAL COSTS Include surveys, soil tests, appraisals, title searches, legal fees, administration of the pr6gram and contingency fUnds. Roughly figured at 20 to 25 percent of the total costs. * FINANCING It is expected that there will be some program.income from the sale of acquired property back to the developers. Although all property on the site (not including public property) has been valued at about $300,000, it is unlikely that the land could be sold back to the developers for this amount. The subsidy or "write-down" of land costs are normally one of the key public contributions to. making a project like this financially feasible to developers. Thus the income from the land sales is difficult to estimate until some negotiations take place with the developers. Mound'has a source of federal funds (Community Development Block Grant) which may be applied to some of these program activities (land acquisition, relocation, site improvements, etcl. However, these funds are programmed through July 1983, and their contribution may be relatively modest in size. A locally 'available financing technique is tax increment financing (TIF). Under this procedure, the City Council or NRA (with City Council approval) would put together a development plan for downtown Mound '(really a legal document rather than a planning document, designed to,meet the provisions ~ter 472A or 462.421~, and then establish a TIF redevelopment district within this project area. To qualify as a TIF redevelopment district, the parcels selected (which may be continguous or non-continguous) must meet the following test (chapter 273.73 subdv. 10): "...(1) 70 percent of the parcels in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other public improvements and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; or . (2) 70 percent of the parcels in the district are occupied by building~i ilities or streets, ut other improvements and 20 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard and an additional 30 percent of the buildings are found to require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unity density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety and general well being of the community; (5)~The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inap- propriately used or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities or excessive dr vacated railroad rights-of-way. (b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of suf- ficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. "Parcel" shall mean a tract or plat of land established prior to the certification of the district as a single unit for purposes of assessment° A preliminary survey of the Mound redevelopment site indicate~ that~the 19 parcelsJlare occupi, ed by buildings, 1 by a street, and 5 by parking lots or alley ways. Only 2 of the parcels are vacant lots. Of the 11 parcels with buildings, at least 2 (one house and the Anderson Building), might meet the test of being structurally substandard. Given the fact that not all of the parcels do not have to be placed in the tax increment district, there appears adequate flexibility in scope to create a district qualifying under number (2) of the condi, tions listed above. If two substandard structures are identified, another 7.parcels (five of which must have structures on them) could be brought together to form a district. If a third substandard structure is identified, an additional 5 parcels could be brought into the district, and so on. Establishing a TIF district has become a somewhat complex process filled with several .pitfalls. Basically, the procedure would follow this path: City Council agrees this area, and the Mound downtown in general, needs redevelopment (essentially done). City Council decides to either disignate itself as the body to implement and administer the redevelopment project, or it may select the Housing -3- (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) and Redevelopment Authority to manage the process. 'There are some subtle advantages and disadvantages to each of these routes. First, under Section 273.75 Limitations, an NRA may use revenues to underwrite a broad range of site acquisition, improvement and preparation costs, as well as a broad range of administrative costs (financial planning, legal fees, etc.) as described under chapter 462.421. Subd. 13. A city council operates under chapter 472A, which states revenues can be used only to pay off capital costs and administrative expenses incurred in developing the district. This means the use of funds might be limited to the TIF district versus the entire downtown project. This point should be very carefully explored, as if one purpose of the TIF district is to potentially assist in work in the entire downtown pro- ject area, there may be advantages to using the HRA. A second area of concern is the City Council must finally approve the TIF plan if the HRA develops it. Thus unless there is general agreement between the Council and HRA on the need and objectives of using TIF, political problems could plague the process as-~t nears completion. A preliminary feasibility study is .completed for the pr°ject. If it appears workable, the City would begin negotiations with the developers of the parcel to obtain commitments on their part in the form of a developer s agreement. This is key to making the project go, and giving the City the flexibility to assemble the site. Staff prepares, a redevelopment plan and tax increment financing plan. City Council holds a public hearing on the TIF Plan. The City contacts affected school district and Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, requesting comments on .the plan. City Council adopts the redevelopment plan and TIF plan, reaching required legislative findings. Necessary plan documents are submitted to the County Auditor and Minnesota State Department of Energy, Planning and Economic Development. Probably the most critical questions is the most elusive at this time. That is, how much funding could a TIF district support. This amount will be determined by how much the assessed value of new development in the district exceeds the current assessed value. The total current assessed value for all properties and improvements is $923,400, thus improvements would have to exceed this amount. Preliminary indications are that this should not be a problem. For example, Super Valu is discussing at least a 29,000 s.f. building at a cost of $35.00/s.f.; this works out to an estimated total cost of $1,015,000. The Hennepin County Assessors Office normally values buildings at about 85 to 90 percent of their real market value, which would put the assessed value of this structure at $862,750 (not including land). Assuming a drug store, bank, and liquor store are built,,the total excess value should provide a sizeable increment. As the developer!s plans solidify, and the City begins negotiations, these figures can be developed in greater detail. CITY 0F MOUND e APPLICATION FOR BINGO PERMIT Date Name of Applicant (If an organization, give organization name). Bingo Manager (Name) Address Phone No.' Address of where Bingo will be played 6 o Dates and Hours Bingo will be played (Attach separate sheet if more room necessary) Is Licen'se Fee attached? Yes N6 / Amount Fidelity Bond: (a) Amount * (Minimum $10,000.) (b) Name of Bonding Company (c) Expiration Date of Bond *Note: Fraternal~ religious, veteran and other non-profit organizat'ions may request th'e Bond t~ be waive'd. Please. indicate below if you are making such a request. applicatio October 14, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 FINAL COST. BREAKDOWN 1982 SEAL COATING & OVERLAY PROGRAM A. Mueller Bros. Buckshot (Pea-Rock) - Patching Materials (Blacktop) - B. Engineering Costs ** C. Misc. Publications - Laker Construction Bulletin Towing D. Allied Blacktop (Seal Coating) E. Aero Asphalt (Overlay) Priest Lane Rustic Ridge Gumwood & Langdon Lane 1,618.55 Tons * 496.35 Tons 18.26 66.69 15.00 7,456.46 3,161.76 14,537.71 TOTAL $6,907.91 6,699.00 7,145.OO 99.95 32,918.42 25,155.93 $78,926.21 F. Public Works Garage (to be paid from Revenue Sharing~ 9,482.90 * Carry over about 100 tons to 1983 ** Preparation of Five Year Plan 1982 Seal Coat Program 2,953.00 4,192.00 RESOLUTION NO. 82- RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER $78,926.21 FROM THE LIQUOR FUND TO THE 1982 SEAL COATING PROGRAM WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, Resolution #82-46 approved the plans and specifications for a five year seal coating program for the streets in Mound, and Liquor Fund revenues are to pay for the project costs, and the 1982 Seal Coating Program costs were $78,926,21, including the preparation of the five year plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the City Council does hereby approve a transfer from the Liquor Fund to the 1982 Seal Coating Program of $78,926.21. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 20, 1982 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Jon Elam, City .Manager Dock Inspector Dredging of Emerald Channel and Ridgewood Access We have received a quote for dredging of the two named areas of our Commons. Both areas have silted in because of storm sewers emptying into the lake at these points. Emerald Channel area will be dredged to a depth of 4 feet 40 feet from shore and sloped to the shoreline. 60 feet of shoreline with an estimated 150 cubic yards to be removed.- : Ridgewood Access area is to be dredged to a .depth of 4 feet 60 feet from shore and sloped to the shoreline. 1OO feet of shoreline with an estimated 300 cubic yards to be removed. I recommend we accept this bid for dredging of these two areas. Nine dock sites are involved and will become unusable shortly without this dredging. Permit holders will be notified to removed their docks as soon as the Council approves bid for the job. Dredging would be completed before freeze up this fall. Don Rother Dock Inspector DR/ms DOCK WORK SEA WALLS RIP RAPPING PILE DRIVING City of Moused 5341 Maywood Road l~Iou~d,M~. 55364 MINNETONKA PORTABLE DREDGING BILL (MICKI NICCUM 500 West Lake Street EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 474-9454 - 472-3457 Oct. 18, 1982 Estimate to remove approximately at the Emerald Chapel. Estimated cost is $1,500.00 150 cubic yards of lake bottom Estimate to remove approximately 300 cubic yards of lake bottom at Ridgewood. Estimated cost is WE PROPOSE to furnish labor and material ~ complete in accordance with above specifications, and subject to conditions found on both sides of this agreement, for the sum of: dollars ($ ). Payment to be made as follows: iPTED. The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfac. and are here/~y accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment wiJ~ be made as outlined above. (Read reverse side). Date of Acceptance By By Respectfully submitted, MINNETONKA PORTABLE DREDGING Note:This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. CITY of MOUND ,.,, MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 26, 1982 TO: City Manager FROM: Park Director Attached is an estimate from Widmer Bros. for cleaning the sand from the launching ramp at Mound Bay Park. Their estimate is based on one day's work. If the ramp cleaning does not take that long, the drainage ditch and spillway near the parking lot need to be cleaned, so the remainder of the time could be expended there. Chris Bollis Park Director CB/ms WIDMER BROS., INC. P. O. Box 218 SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55354 Phone 471-8593 PHONE IDATE October 22, 1982 P.OPOSAL SUaM,TTE0 TO City of Mound STREET 5341 Maywood Rd. CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE ~ JOB NAME Mom-~a Park JOB LOCATION Mound, Mn 95364 A.CHITEC? DATE OF PLANS Chris Bollis We hereby submit specifications and estimates 1or: Clean Sand from Launching Ramp at Mound Park. Estimated Cost .................... t...day...wit.h...a....S/~....cu..yd...Backhoe:.+ ...2....~.....tO....cu...yds...Dump.. Trucks JOB PHONE .$1 8.oo We reserve the right to file a Mechanics Lien if bill is not paid within the length of time prescribed by law.. 'W ~"~ ri I" ~f6't "b ~**' i~ i5i5'i~ ~i bl ~"f 6i;'*~ i5 ~/*'d 'fi*d ~ i~'i~ ~ 'd'i~ d" Lit il i t i ~;"t I~t "~a'ii i5 ~t"b ~*' I~ ~ ~ t ~ d"by"t'h ~"U ti r~ ty**ct~m pa n*ie'~*'o f*tl~ e"tt o'~ e owne r: Normal c~ean~u~.~is~`~!~.n..9.!.9~f~..e~d...!..n~....t".h.!.s....~.r...~.~...~.~4.~.T.~.[~.!~.~9~9~..~!gy~[.~.~..!.~.!~.~.~[~p~.~L~.~.~..?!~!...~..~.~`~?.~[~P~.~!.~!.!~ for water pipes, trees, tree roots, sprinkler systems, etc. unless notified to exact location prior to excavating. Frost ripping extra charge. Itis expressly.stipulated andagreed..that the.undersigned shall notbeheldJiable..for damages.to grass, trees,..shrubland..anyul!derground including pipes, electrical wiring and etc. -' hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in accordance With above specifications, for the sum of: One Thousand One Hundred Twenty-~igh$ ...... Payment to be made as follows: after · dollars ($ 1;128,00 ). All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifica- tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, end will become an extra charge over end a~ove the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents ' delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. workers ere fully covered by Workmen°s Compensation Insurance. Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. o[ roposa[ --The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature Signature CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 20, 1982 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Manager Park Director Stairway Construction at South end of Avocet and Bluebird Lanes At the October 14th Park Commission meeting, a request was approved for the City to construct and maintain stairways at the South end of Avocet and Bluebird Lanes on Wiota Commons. I have examined the two sites 'and determined that it would be possible to construct timber stairs, like the one we built on Canary Lane for an approximate cost for both stairs of $1,700.O0. Funding for the stairs would come from the $10,O00. of revenue sharing that the Council earmarked for Commons improvement. The work could be done in the Spring of 1983. An additional part of the Park Commission resolution stated that two privately constructed stairways just adjacent to the proposed stairs be repaired or removed at the owner's expense. The people making the request claimed that the stairs were in need of repair. I will contact the stairs in question and find out what their choice s. Chris Bollis Park Director CB/ms MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 9, 1982 MOUND ADVISORY. PARK COMMISSION MEETING Present: Co-Chair Cathy Bailey and Cheryl Burns; Co~missioners Delores Maas, LoWell Swanson, Andy Gearhart, Pete Ward, Phyllis Jessen and Toni Case; Coun- cil Representative. Pinky 'Charon; Park Director Chris Bollis and Secretary Marge Stutsman. Chair Cathy Bailey opened the meeting. MINUTES The minutes of the Pa~k Commission meeting of August 12, 1982 were presented for consideration. Gearhart moved and Jessen-seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the August 12, 1~82 Park Commission meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor, V .Request for Steps down 'to the Commons at Avocet and B1ueblrd Lanes (South) X The followlng persons signed in on the attendance sheet: Christine Terlinden, Geoff and Robin Michael and Ron and Judy Blaschko. Also present were Gordon Woytcke and'other interested persons. Gordon Woytcke stated that he started the petition and had .gone around to the neighbors regarding this request and.that-for'years the neighbors have been going up and do~n to the lake on steps about halfway between Avocet and Blue- bird and no-that new people had moVed into the abutting home, there have been hard feelings due to.the fact they'thOught the steps were private. The neighbor~ are unanimous in-asking if there is anyway they can get steps at both'Avocet and Bluebird Lanes so they don't have. to cross over private land. Also they noted that there are. street lights at the ends of both of these lanes. The Park Director exp]ained that the existing stairs are on publ. ic property ~nd are public even tho ,they may .have.been privately constructed. Moving stairway was discussed, but Park Director. thought it was not practical to move; stairs not sal. vagable. New stairs could be put in for between $500-$600 each depending on the slope° The Ch'alt discussed the policy'on maintenance'permits whiCh was adopted'in 1~76. Per the flow chart, people probably would not be able to replace or repair this stairway. If the stairs are not up to code and safe for public use,'they' should be removed. The Commission asked if. residents would be.willing to build if materials suppli.ed at reasonable cost or to what extent might people be willing to be financially helpful as cohstruct'ion of.stairs was not in the City Budget. It was also asked how they feel about a well marked'path to make use of existing stairs. Discussed the Problem'that Commons are not marked and people a~e unsure of where property lines are. The group did not wish to build steps for people from all over to use. The Park Director advised 'that this Commons is dedicated for the use of the people in this subdivision. It was questioned how many stairways might be requested to be constructed on the various Commons. Geoff Mi. chael felt stairs were needed at .the end of these lanes because of. the slopes and that stairs bui]t where there is already lightlng might save the City from some lawsuits. The park Commission made a motion' to recommend that the Staff study and determine the need for stairways on Commons and the scope of the whole problem and bring back to the next Park Commission meeting. The vote was unanlmously in favor. MINUTES OF THE OCTOB.ER 14, 1982 MDUND. ADVI.SOKY PARK COMMISSION MEETING Present: Co-Chair Cathy Bailey; Commissioners Delores Maas, Lowell Swenson, Andy Gearha.rt, Pete Ward, Phyllis Jessen and Toni Case who arrived at 8 P.M.; Council Representative Pinky Charon; City Manager Jon Elam; Park Director Chris Bollis; Summer Recreation Director Jackie Meyer and Secretary Marge Stutsman. Co-Chair Cheryl Burns was absent and excused. Also pPesent were: Dr. Harold Pellett, Diana Clemas, John Hirt, Merlin Woytcke, Allen Dolejsl, Paul Willette, Christine Terlinden, Duwayne Terlinden, Gill Nedder- meyer, Gerry Neddermeyer, Gordon'Woytcke, Geoff Michael, Robin Michael, Jeannine Dolejsi and John Tombers. Chair Cathy Bailey opened the meeting and welcomed those persons present stating that since most persons present were interested in.Item 5, this would be changed to 2 on the Agenda and ~ltem 6 would be 3, Steps on Commons - Reques't for Steps at Avocet'and Bluebird Lanes.(South) The Park Director explained that at the'last Park Commission meeting, he had been requested to look at scope of problem to determine need for stairways on various commons where terrain situation is similar to this and that he has toured all the Commons and this is.the only area except for Finch Lane that has the type of shore- line Where you can walk..both, on top of bank and on the shoreline tha~ is a major use area having docks. John Hirt stated present stairway in front of his property is poor quality and hazardous. When he moved into house, he fixed two treads that were rotted; there is a handrail, but it is inadequate and stairway is not up .to code. Bailey moved and Swenson seconded a motion to recommend to City Council that stairways on Commons'at end.of Bluebird Lane and Avocet Lane be built by .the City and marked "public" as'City owned stairs and furthermore, that the present sets of stairs be removed or fixed up by property owners. The vote was unani- mously in favor. City Manager stated'.ipersons present would be notified of the date.of the Council meeting---either October 26th or November 3rd. The Park Director explained that the present owner would have to chose to..claim the stairway and make application for a maintenance permit if they wish to leave the stairway. Commissioner Case arrived. Someone commented that flushing of the hydrant at Bluebird had created a gully and that.the bank is being eroded away and also complained of the number of dead trees on the Commons. City Manager responded that he would direct the Water .Department accordingly and that to take down all the dead trees on Commons would be economically unfeasible and only trees taken dow~¥w~ere health and safety is involved. Persons present stated they'd take down the dead trees for the wood. The Chairman stated she would like to have landmarks showing where the Commons begin for'neighborhood use. Slide Show Presentation Dr. Harold Pellett, horticulturist at the Minnesota Arboretum, presented a slide show and talked about donating surplus plants for the downtown area and parks. Park Commission Minutes September 9, 1982 - Pa~e 2 It was suggested'that .the Commission members look at the Avocet Bluebird area before the next meeting. The Park Commlssion would 'like to hear the City Attorney' opinion on marking of the Commons so they can set a policy. Reports , The Council Representatives Pinky Charon, reported that the Council has approved advertising for bids for work on Mound Bay Park:..Also the Council has budgeted funds for Chemlawn treatment of the Cit~ Park~ so they wi.ll have'n'i~e:-gras.s. The Park Director.reported~on.the following.items: 1) The parking lot in Mound BaY Park has-been blacktopped/CitYsaved a lot of mOney because it was 'part of an add on of another.street..project, 2) City. Council has' approved, a single°bid received, for 'the Three-Points Park .tennis court so,.weather permitting, it will be done'the end of next week, 3) -City. Council accepted prices for a baseball .. diamond at..Brookton Pa~k, and 4) on Highland Park~'.step I has been taken -- the.: sewer..til:e from MOund Bay Park was moved in and put'on.a sand base. CommisSioner.Maas.reported..there is going to be a contest:for neighborhood_kids to decide how'to paint.tile---will have a potlOck supper and give out prizes for ideas~ ' The. Park Director distributed cooies of the EnnkLet '!Five Year' Park. Development and it-~pro~eme~iTt Plah'~ prepared by Shel)ey Nett and Lynn Nichols. The Park Com- mission asked that they be sen't, a Certificate of Appreciation and tha6k.you card for. their work. Adjournment Maas moved and Jessen seconded a 'moti.on: to adjourn the Park Commission meeti'ng at .~):10 P.M, Al) in.favor, so adjourned. October 21, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER RE: CLEAN-UP Bids will be handed out at the meeting. '2:00 P.M., Monday, October 25, 1982. They are to be submitted at s~z~d o~n~ a~z~I zo saI~qo~o~n~ ~I~zaG (~) ~q=~ (~) s~oo~ pu~ ~ouoo 's~oI 'sdumas (V) ~dnMoid ~o~ p~=d~o== ~ou 'dnMSfd )o ~mI~ ~q~ ~ ao) pied s3 ~ s~ ~uoI s~ 's~ II.mS zaq~o II~ ao~} p~u~¥s~p st s~ K~p a~s aR: uo dn pa~oTd aR %ITa smarT' pabsT% aAoq~ at~L · qo~a O0'~D saxTZ 'saaqs~n 'sassaa~em 'saao~$ s~ qons smart a~a~I ~snm puw psxoq ao pbg~wq aq ~snz dn~oId ~oj sm~III¥ IA ~ A s~ouToazd - ~eG pu~ ~ Zaqur~aoN II 9 I suouToa~ - K~G ~sI I :aqmaaoN GN'IqOI*i ~0 A£I3 October 21, 1982 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Sir: The following is our bid for the 1982 Fall Cleanup: Truck and driver - $30.00 per hour Each helper lO.O0 per hour Dumping Charges Approx. $15.00 per hour $5,100.00 flat fee including dumping cha~ges. Sincerely, Westonka sanitation 472-1379 .[ &~ uelJV g~t<~'~Z,6 euoqdelel 8~ 'uull/~ 'OUeleQ eue-I Je^olO ~0~ SH~IAHHS CITY of MOUND October 21, 1982 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER CBD SNOW REMOVAL BIDS Bids.will be handed out at the meeting. 10:00 A.M., Monday, October 25, 1982. They are to be submitted at JE:fc CITY OF MOUND 140UND~ CfPJTRACTED SNOJ REMCUAL SPECIFICATIONS R~move snow from designated p~rking lots and other speclf{ed area as soon as possible after snow fall. Deposit snow as directed .by Public Works. .. Central Businzss District.streets and sid~lks as follows: so %{est side of Co. Rd. ~/llO, from new Telephon~ Co. offic~ .. driveway (old Sears building) north to Lynwood Blvd. b. E~st side of Co. Rd. ~110, from Southside of V & S Jewelry north to old scboot parking lot. co Northside of Co. Rd. #15, from Co. Rd. /~110 east to Bzlmont Lane. d. Southside of Co. Rd. ~15, from Col Rd. ~110 to eastsld~ of · . Post Office. -. ' 3- Parking Lots ~nd siX,ye " s. ~ound City Office, lot ~nd dr~v~. " ';' '.b. Telephone Co. buildin~, (old S~rs). south and rear. lots.~ c. ~lon~sl Shoe Store (old Nzlson Shoes) rear of store. d. Rust~e D~corst~n~, rzsr lot. - .-. e. ~etks Furn~t~e Store, rear lot. f, Eberhsrdt Realty, rear and north lotsi . . :~ ~.. Park~n~ lot s~outh of ~s~lro~d trecks, norhh of Co. Rd..~lt, from ;.~innesots'Federsl east to Belmont Lane. h. South sid~ of Dr. Botts office. '- {. Auditors Ro~d, all.. .. -. 3- Both lots, east ~nd %mst of Post Officz. ... . k. Parking. lot behind Dr. ~urs and Lon~pres. l. ~4 hou~ lot'south of Auditors Road. m. Super Valu lo%, slX. .- . n. South side of Tom ~b Store. (oid Prize ~ntry) o. Parking lot norhh of Medical Clinic,all. .. p. Mound State B~nk lo%, slX.. . q. 'Road and' parking area ~esh of Telephone ~. north to railroad' ....:. A Bid B~nd or Certified Check must' accog~ny ~id. ' '"' "-' ~e successful bidder ~ill be re~ired %o post a P~rfo~ance Bon~ or Cerhlf~ed ' '"' Check in the amount of $500.00. . The successful bidder must furnish liability of not less than $100,00 for e~ch Individual, $300,000 for each occ~rence,"and a~ainst liability for ~rop2rty dam29, of not less than $50, O00for each occurrence. informalities. . The su:¢essful bidder'will s~d the bill for above'"$crvice to the City' on ~ monthly basiz. bids are to be firm for tbz · EOUIP2tEN. T & OPERATOR Hourly R~te t982/1983 uinter sno~ removal season.' Front End Loaders: (2 or 9½ yd buckeb) · Per Hour Trucks: ~.~ Tandzva ~xle, -/4~ box'.. List ~11 othar equipment to be used for p~rkln~ lot'snow removal, .h.ourly rste ,lith op,r-tor.'' ' ~.~~~~'. ~ ~z~ ,, ., Contracto The successful b;dd~r will s~nd thc b~ll for above service to the City on a monthly basic. bids are to be £irm for the e · EQUIPM~-N. T & OPERATOR · . Hourly P~te t982/1983 Winter snow r~moval season. A. Front End Loaders: (2-or 2½ yd bucket) . B. Truak~: · Per Hour ~/~ ~ Tand~ axle, 10 ~ box. ~ ~ L~st all oth~ e~[~ent to be used for psrkin~ lot'snow r~ovsl, ho~ly r~te with operator. '. , .. (8/80) The City reserves the right to reject ,ny' and all Bids, ~nd walve any informalities. . The successful bidder will s~nd the bill for above service to the City on * monthly b~sis. bids are to be firm for th, 1982/1983 winter snow re~oval season. E~UII~tEN. T & OPERATOR Hourly Rate A. Front End Loaders: (2 or Pa1 yd bucket) ~Per Hour` Trucks: Single §xle, 5 yd bo~. Tand~m sxle, 10 yd box. Ce L~st all other equiPment to be used for parking lot'snow removal, hourly rate with operator. .. Contractor Address. CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472~1155 October 21, 1982 TO: FROM: RE: CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER POLICE SUPERVISOR CONTRACT Attached are the only new sheets covering 1983's LELS Contract. There are no changes in contract language and the salary terms for 1983 are exactly the same that exist in the third year of the contract of the police patrolmen. I would urge the Council to approve this contract. Bruce Wold will be available to answer any questions. JE: fc APPENDIX "B" INSURANCE ao The Employer agrees to provide each employee, after thirty (30) days of continuous employment, with hospitalization/major medical insurance, including~dependent coverage, five-thousand ($5,000) life insurance policy and pay eighty-five percent (85%) of the premiums due. It will also provide each employee with iong-term dlsab~lity insurance and pay one hundred percent (100%) of the premiums due. The Employer agrees to provide a Dental Insurance policy for each employee and dependents and pay up to a maximum of twenty-six ($26,00) dollars per month of the premiums due. Upon'retirement, after twenty (20) years of service at age fifty- five (55), empl.oyees who'retire shall receive fifty percent (50%) of his/her hospitalization, major medical and dental insurance for retiree and spuse paid by the Employer. If the employee elects to be gainfully employed by another employer, either public of private, he/she shall lose any and all rights to insurance benefits provided by the City of Mound. Upon the employee's sixty~second (62) birthday, the Employer shall pay full premiums £or hospitalization, major medical and dental insurance for retiree and spouse. e. Employees retireing during the term of this contract shall be entitled to the bedefits as set forth in Sections. 17.7 and 17.8. 2. EYE EXAMINATIONS The Employer shall pay th'irty dollars'($30.OO)'toward an eye examination for each employee once in each twenty-four (24) month period of employment. 3. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE Each Employee shall be entitled to.an annual uniform allowance of four hundred dollars ($400.00) payable on January 2 in one lump sum payment. b. The Employer agrees to replace all clothing damaged in the line of duty at no cost to the employee. APPEND IX "A" 1. Effective January 1, 1983, the salary schedule shall be as follows: '.Supervisor/Sergeant of Patrol Supervisor/Sergeant of Investigation Monthly Salary $2,471.O0 $2,570.00 CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 21, 1982 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Enclosed are the specifications that the Street Department has put together for the 1983 snow plow/dump truck. We need to approve them and set the bid opening for November 23, 1982, at 10:00 A.M. This was approved in the 1983 Budget. Delivery will take place after January 1st and thus payment will be out of next years budget. JE:fc ,,1 SPECIFICATIONS FOR SINGLE AXLE 27,500 G.V.W. CAB AND CHASSIS WITH REVERSIBLE PLOW, WING, DUMP BODY AND SANDER. INTENT: It is the intent of these specifications to describe equipment that will standardize the City of Mound Snow Plowing Fleet and is best suited to our needs. CAB AND CHASSIS: Shall be diesel powered single axle as per minimum spedifications. ENGINE: ,. 210 H.P., 3208 Cat. FRONT AXLE: 12,000 lb. with power steering REAR AXLE: 23,000 lb. - 2 speed CAB TO AXLE: 84 inch minimum. SPRINGS: Front - 8,.000 Rear - 11;500 Auxiliary - 2,250 TRANSMISSION: Spricer 6052C, 5 Speed, Close Ratio BATTERIES: 3-93 amp batteries 625 CCA BUMPER TO BACK OF CAB: 105 inch minimum. MIRRORS: Stainless steel dual west coast with 6" stainless auxiliary convex mirrors. BRAKES: Full air cam type, 12 cu.ft, compressor spring lock parking braze with MGM chambers. A~R DRYER: B.W. type. ASSIST HANDLES: ~._CabT~k.~ Mounted right & left. FRAME: 15.9 SM 110,000 PSI, with 24" integral frame extension welded or bolted on type not acceptable. FRONT TIRES: 10'00 x 20 12 ply tires. REAR TIRES: 10:00 x 20 mud and snow Firestone Super all traction with spare rim° ~- TURN SIGNALS: Self canceling type. HEATER: Heavy duty - deluxe with defroster. CLUTCH: Heavy duty 14" 2 plate° SEATS: Bostrom west coast drivers with passenger. HOOD° Tilting fiberglass with butterfly opening. GLASS: Tinted throughout. ' HORN: Dual air with snow covers. RADIO: AM/FM type WHEELS: Cast spoke 7.5" 3 pc. rims. CRANKSHAFT OPENING: Shall be supplied corded radiators .(not acceptable.) FUEL TANKS: 50 gallon left hand stop type. .GAUGES: Linehaal instrument panel, with hour meter, tachometer, warning lights and buzzer. EXHAUST: Vertical left side mounted with heat shield. ALTERNATOR: 90 amp minimum. PAINT: 9355546H Orange. DUMP BODY: Size: Capacity: Floor: Sides: Tailgate: 9'X7' 4 to 5 cubic yards. .. 8 guage with 6" radius. 10 gauge Fully boxed type with 108 type center lever and air actuated for dumping. Corner Posts:Front corner posts and full depth r~ar corner posts. Under Structure: Stacked type with spaces filled to prevent wash boarding. Crossmembers: On 12" centers structural steel type. Tail Lights; Back-up'Lights and Stop Lights: 'Recessed into rear corn~ posts.. (Combination t~p?). Cab Shield: 1/2 Cab Type with provision for wing post and verticle Side Braces: 6" side braces with drain holes. Hardware: 1" flame cut. Spreader Chains: 3/8" Running Boards: Sloped type. Miscellaneous: Rear tow.hooks, body support prop, electric bac~-up alarm, and mud flaps front and rear of duals. HOIST: Type: Class{ Model: Underbody single cylinder. 40 - power up, power down Garwood AS0.D.A. HYDRAULICS: Pump: Pump Drive.: Valves:. Controls: Commercial Shearing PSOA542-BEYL 20~25 (Front Mounted) Electromagnetic with indicator light Gresen. 2$P(TT)DFS3-(CF)-4-3-4-4-4 Morse .type (Contact City for mounting) Check Valve: LT 75 with indicator. Filter: Gresen FS252-100E suction side. Oil Reservoir: 50 gallon with gate valve. LIGHTS: Roof Bar: Removable type with 6-wire plug and socket. Turn Lights: Double faced mounted on roof bar. Plowing Lights: Sealed beam mounted on roof bar with dimmer switch Stop Lights: 7" stop light mounted on roof bar. Beacon: fi£etz £m~er B~acoh mounted 'on counte~ ba~ahced gr[cke[ on shield. POWER REVERSIBLE POLYMAR SNOW PLOW: Model: Size: Moldboard: Cutting Edge: Reversing Mechanism: Worm gear type with hydraulic motor rather than cylinders. Drive Frame: Rugged tubing construction with bolt on gear sections. Spray Guard: Bolt on 12" wide x 1/4" thick rubber belt. Frink 4511PISA-WG 45" high by 11 ft. long. Polyethelene one piece, 3/8" thick, 7000 P.S.I. tensile strength, clamped to frame work. Tripping type one section by means of 6 torsion springs, 1/2"x8" C1090 steel, punched AASHO. SIDE TYPE LEVELING WING: Model: Size: Ribs: Top Edge: Tripping Mechanism: Wing Braces: Wing Control Cabinet: Mounting: Frink 10BRA38 10' long overall, 29" high at nose, 37" high at rear. 6 vertical ribs and 2 full horizontal ribs. Completely boxed for greater strength. Wing shall be capable of tripping over an obstacle or being locked rigid. Heavy duty telescoping type with rear support beam 3/8" formed channel 12" wide. Enclosed type (protecting the rams and valves). On right side with 16" clearance between box and cab. HITCH: Model: Frink Custom side plate type. Quick Attach: Tor-Lok welded into custom side plate. Lifting Device:4" x 10" hard chrome plated piston. Plow Portion: Arrowhead pin on type. UNDER TAILGATE SANDER: Model: Swenson UR310 with hydraulic motor and controls Light: Sander light with in cab switch. MOUNTING: All equipment to be mounted by one vendor for service and warranty. PAINT: All equipment to be painted 9355546H Orange. CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA BID PROPOSAL DIESEL POWER SINGLE AXLE 27,500 GVW WITH PLOW, WING, DUMP BODY AND SANDER Ail bidders must submit bids on this form to furnish equipment as specified Ail prices are to include mounting and F.O.B. Mound, MN Cab and Chassis Make Model Dump Body Make Model Snow Plow Make Model Wing Make yodel Under Tail Gate Make Sander Model Total price of Cab Chassis, Dump Body, Snow Plow, Wing and Sander: $ Signature of Bidder' Title Firm Date BILLS .... OCTO~E~ zo, 1982 Earl F Andersen 8 Assoc Air Comm Ho11¥ Bostrom Butler Paper F.H. Bathke Jon Elam ELMarketing First Bank Mpls Fire Control Extinguisher Finley Bros. Enterprises Dennis Gronberg Nick Gronberg Robert E. Johnson Eugene Hickok & Assoc Henn Co. Director Prop Tax Illies & Sons J.B. Distributing Lyman Lumber Glen Litfin Transfer L.O.G.I.S. Long Lake Ford Tractor Lakeland Ford Truck Sales Mound Postmaster Metro Waste Control Jackie Meyer McCombs Knutson M.F.O.A. City of Minnetrista Mtka Painting & Decorating MN UC Fund Minn Comm Metro Fone Communication Metro Waste Control Minnegasco Meyer Bros. Dairy Neitge Construction N.W. Bell Telephone N.S.P. Poucher Printing Pitney Bowes Credit Reo Raj Kennels Real One Acquisition Don Streicher Guns Securi:ty Alarms Swenson Nursery I80.72 96.00 198.44 263.64 20.70 19.65 36.00 12.oo 87.95 11o.oo 620.00 1,432.36 25.52 857.50 32,374.65 2,920.0O 55.2O 17.04 75.OO 1,219.12 9.98 17.26 6OO. OO 1,683.o0 lO7.87 9,142.oo 2.5O 48.OO 1,746.00 177.o0 28.5O 11.80 19,277.27 82.95 22.50 200.00 72.8O 4,144.65 477.OO 26.00 85.OO 1,342.52 400.30 386.19 50.O0 S & M Sales £tate Treas-Surplus Seton Service Tuff-Kote Rustproof Thurk Bros Chev Unltog Rental Waterous Co. Wurst Pearson Hamilton Westonka Community Srv Widmer Bros. Xerox Corp R.L. Youngdahl & Assoc Griggs, Cooper Johnson Bros. Liquor MN Distillers Old Peoria Ed Phillips & Sons Davies Water Equip Lathrop Paint Supply Mound Super Valu Mound Fire Relief Assn TOTAL BILLS 40.00, 25.00 ~.9o 300.00 223.35. 267.32 352.61 11,450.37 129.03 432.00 82.72 5,270.0O 1,952.19 2,646.08 1,793.22 1,554.10 1,688.65 15.05 440.52 41.36 35,494.59 $144,962.64 CITY OF MOUND MINNESOTA LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 ASSETS Current Assets Cash Petty cash Due from other funds Inventory Pre-paid Expenses (insurance) Property and Equipment Less: accumulated depreciation Total Assets Sept. 30, 1982 $ 190,518 925 3,880 98,156 579 57,509 (47,879) $ 303,688. LIABILITIES AND RETAINED EARNINGS Liabilities Accrued benefits Accounts payable {salaries) Accounts payable (sales ~ax} Total Liabilities Retained Earni~ngs Total [labilities and Retained Earnings 10,288 1,119 2,826 14,233 289,455 3O3,688 CITY OF HOUND, HINNESOTA LIQUOR FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSE AND RETAINED EARNINGS QUARTER ENDED SEPT. 30, 1982 Sales L|quor and Wine Beer Mix Misc. Total Sa]es Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Quarter Ended Sept. 3'0, 1982 y-T-D Sept. 30~' 1982 92,610 $ 263,864 101,379 253;828' 5,176 11,310 187. 2~105 199,352 $ 531,107 150~041(est) $ 49,311 399,764(est) 131,343 Percent Of Sales 100.00 75.27 24.73 17.95 6,78 Operating EXpenses Operating Income 27,901 $ 95'326 21,410 $ 36,017 Other Revenue (expense) Commissions Check processi.ng fee Write-off NSF checks Cash over(short) Total Other 100 $ 236 20 79 (473) (473) (28) (381) $ (230) (.04) Net Income before Transfers 21,029 $ 35,787 6.74' Retained Earni'.ngs Beginning,of Period 268,426 $ 253,668 Retained Earn(.ngs End of Per!od '$'289;455 289,455 CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA LIQUOR FUND STATEMENT OF OPERATING EXPENSES QUARTER ENDED SEPT. 30, 1982 Operating Expenses Salaries Office supplies· Copy machine General operating supplies Cleaning supplies Audit and financial Postage Telephone Use of personal auto Printing Workers ·compensation General liability insurance Utilities Equipment repair Buildi.ng repair Land and landscape Building rent Central equip rent Protection service rent Licenses'& taxes Janitorial Misc. T~tal operati'.ng expenses before depreciation Depreciation Total 0Perat~.ng. Expenses Quarter Y-T-D 1982 Ended As Of Budget Sept. 30, 82 Sept. 30~ 82 $ 86,690 500 500 2,500 2OO 1,500 25O 85o 15o 15o 16,950 5,845 1,000. 1,OOO 1OO 10,475 8OO 37,5OO 1,7oo 650 $ 169,310 $ 20,562 48 48 5OO lO7 29 364 29 156 73 147 1,947 67 2,025 537 299 2O5 27,143 · '758 '$.'.27190i $ 61,582 61 31o 1,672 1,605 115 795 74 322 513 8,711 4,869 739 57 10 7,671 1,856 386 54 1,275 375 93,052 2,274 Percent of Sales 11.60 .O1 .06 .31 .3O .02 .15 .O1 .06 .10 1.64 .92 .14 .O1 1.44 .35 .07 .O1 .24 .07 17.51 .43 17.94 AGHNDA X~nnehaha Creek #a~e~shed District October 21, 1982 #ayzata Cit~ Hall IEW I~CATION Huniclpal Courtroom Area First Ploor/#eat Hud of Library 7:30 p.m. 1. Call to orderl present, absent, staff. 3. Approval or a~endment of 10/21/82 agenda. 4. Hearing of permit applications. ~ 81-119 Alvin Ouist- approval of lakeshore ' setback He Ce Ho Je variance request, intersection of County Rd 125 and #arlboro ~ane,~Hmera!d Lake, Round. 82-22 #.th.diet Hospital - ll,00O sq ft building addition in the F-2 floodplain, Hxceleior Blvd adjacent to Ninnehaha Creek, St. Louis Park. 82-33 Schlee Builders, Xnc. - 48 lot residential subdivision on 19 acres referred to as 'Hava£ro,' CountM Rd 15 and Blaine Ave, O~ono. 82-63 Independent School District J284 - grading and drainage plan for a central storage facility, Oakwood School property, Plymouth. 82-74 Jack Overman - wood retaining wall al.n9 creek, 5109 ¥ooddale at Hans.hahs Creek, Bdina. 82-76 Paul Hrickaon - SHrickaon Tonkawood Addition,' 4-lot single family development, Tonkawood Rd, Hans.tonka. 82-78 H and N Company - grading and drainage plan for a commercial a£~e on 2.84 acres, HE corner of Plymouth Rd and R~y 12, Rinnetonka. 82-86 Centurian Company - grading and drainage SAuburnU a residential development, south of Hwy 7, weak of Van But.n, Hopkins. 82-87 Lundg~en Bros. Construction, Xnc. - gtad~n9 and drainage foe 'Millow Bends a single family re8iden~ial development, ~2-88 HArm.tonka Business Associates - grading and drainage foe the ~innetonka Business Park, Williston Rd ~een Xndus~Eial Rd and Ha~ga~e~ Place, Hlnne~onka. 82-89 Bric ~en and Associates - af~e~-~he-fac~ drainage improveBen~s ~d f~ll to develop usable conercial lot, ~oun~v Rd 19 ~d Brent~ Ave, TonkaBay. City of Bound -'fill end excavation to relocate ~ooks Bay, Lake Hinnetonka, Hound. #. 82-91 #. ¢. Wood - rip-rap ah.reline er.alan protection, iBay, Lake Hinnetonka, Tonka Bay. John #. Stone - aluminum retaining wall for ne erosion_prot~ctio~, Harrison Bay, Lake #inn.tonka, O. 82-93 Jack G. Hanlett - 84 lineal Et of rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Carmen Bay, Lake #inn.tonka, Or.no. 62-94 Sovlll llanageBent Corp. - drainage improvements, Hillside Terrace Apartments, Lake Vier Lane at Dexter Drive, Long Lake. 82-95 City of #inn.tonka - construction of a pedestrian bike bridge ove~ Rinneh&ha C~eek, north of City Civic Center, Ninnetonka. 82-96 Th.Bas Healey - rip-rap shoreline inprovenents and beach sand blanket, channel between Gideon Bay and Tonka Bay Lagoon, Tonka Bay. 82-97 N&egele Outdoor Adv. Co. - outdoor advertising sign and access road, Bwy 7 at ChristBas Lake Rd, ShoE.wood. 82-98 Peter S. Watson - beach sand blanket, Gideon Bay, Lake Hinnetonka, St.raw.od. U. 82-99 VEA Corporation - grading and drainage for a multiple housing proJect~ 12601 Sherwood Place, ~innetonkao 82-100 City of Hinnetonks - utilities construction at Hrickson's Tonkawood Addition, Tonkawood Rd, Minnetonka. 82-101 Larry Bader - grading and drainage plan for 5 single family hones and .uti.ts, Riveria Lane South at ~ello~stone T~ail, Shot.wood. 82-102 Keith AEneson - lake setback variance of 37'+/- to construct a garage~ ChristBas Lake, Shot.wood. 82-103 Harvey #acKay - lake setback variance of for addition ~o existing structure, ChristB&s Lake, St,tee, od. 82-104 Tonka Lake Properties - 3 lot subdivision with one existing home on 2.75 acres, Baldur Park Peninsula, North &r~, Lake Rinnetonka, Or.no. 82-105 Ting.wood, Inc. - grading and dzainage for a 9-unit townhouse project, Radisson Inn Rd north of Chris[Bas Lake, St.fey.od. 5. Correspondence. 6. 'Hearing of requests foe petitions by public for action by the Watershed District. ?. Reports of Treasurer, Bngineer and Attorney. .A. Treasurer's Report - Hr. Carroll (1) Administrative Fund Report B. Bngineer*s Report - Hr. Panzer (2) Bydrodata Collection and Billing - Nemorandun dated September 16, 1982 Pe~Bit Application Forn/Fees - HemoEandum dated September 1, 1982 (3) Wate~ ~aintenance and Repair Fund - Requests for Payment (4) Volunteer Lake Level Honitoring - Status Report (5) CP-7 West 44th Street Dredging - Status Report (6) CP-5 Painter Creek gnginee£'s Report C. Attorney's Report - Hr. Hacomber 8. Unfinished Business. A. Rule and Regulation Revision/Chapter 509 B. District Initia~ed Haintenance P~oJects C. Bridge Obst~uction D. D~aft Permit Application Guidelines 9. Hew Business. 10. Adjournment. TWIN LABOR CITIES MARKET INFORMATION ,L,,ABOR FpRq£ COND,,IT, I,ONS Vol. 6 No. l0 -October 1982 Developments from a Month Ago The Twin Cities unemployment rate' edged upward to 6.4 percent in August. This was the second consecutive month that the area's unemployment rate did not experience a usual seasonal decrease after the initial June surge of students and graduates into the labor market. For those who analyze monthly changes in the number of employed and unemployed residents, the August figures present a real challenge. In particu- lar, the number of employed residents is estimated to have increased by 5,700 or 0.5 percent. This is probably more due to the statistical adjustments used in the esti- mating methodology than to a real improvement in the job market. It sharply contra- dicts both the July-August estimates of wage and salary jobs based on a sample of establishments in the Twin Cities area and historical July to August total employ- patterns over the past twelve years. .. LABOR FORCE Kr. STIHATES (not seasonally a~usted) A~EA CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE TOTAL EMPLOYHENT UNFJ~LOYHENT UNEHPLOYHENT RATE AUG.m JULY, . AUG. AUG. JULYD AUG. AUG. JULYe AUG.D AUG.e JULYD A~G. 1982' 1982K 1981R 1982p 1902" 1981R 1982p 1982" 1981" 1982' 1982" 1981R Hi nneapol t s- St. Paul SMSA· 1,156.g 1,149.1 1,147.6 1,082.9 1,077.2 1,100.$ 74.0 71.9 47.0 $.¢ 6.3 4.1 County: knoka 109,667 109,041 108,933 102,$19 101,980 1'04,192 7,148 7,061 4,741 6.5 6.5 4.4 C~rver 20,673 20,685 20,543 19,377 19,276 19,693 1,296 1,409 850 6.3 6.8 4.1 Chisago 14,360 14,234 14,266 13,452 13,381 13,671 908 853 595 6.3 6.0 4.2 Dakota 108,189 107,418 107,072 101,532 100,g98 103,189 6,667 6,420 3,883 6.2 6.0 3.6 Hennept n 525,8861 522,144 522,180 492,418 489,828 500,450 33,468 32,316 21,730 6.4 6.2 4.2 Ramsey 257,873 255,891 255,424 240,496 239,~31 244,419 17,377 16,660 11,005 6.7 6.5 4.3 Scott 24,884 ~ 24,552 24,340 22, g02 22,781 23,275 1,982 1,771 1,065 8.0 7.2 4.4 Washington 62,817 ! 62,465 62,344) 59,405 59,092 60,374 3,412 3,373 1,974 5.4 6.4 3.2 Wright 32,629 32,732 32,499 30,841 30,680 31,344 1,788 2,062 1,155 5.5 6.3 3.6 Ct.ty of Hlnneepol is 208,832 207,276 207,137 194,031 193,010 197,196 14,801 14,266 9,941 7.1 6.9 4.8 City of St. Paul 152,634 151,463 150,873 141,347 140,604 143,663 11,287 10,859 7,220 7.4 7.2 4.6 Minnesota* 2,181.3 2,184.4 2,162.3 2,021.4 2,024.1 2,063.4 159.9 160.3 98.9 7.3 7.3 4.6 United States· 111,887 112,526 110,099 101,177 101,490 102,152 10,710 11,036 7,947 9.6 9.8 7.2 P ' Preliminary R - Revised · U.S., Minnesota, and SFLSA data in thousands. The number of unemployed workers in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area has increased by.27,000 or 57.5 percent since last August. To get a better idea how the recession has affected different groups within the labor force, we rely on national data from the Current Population Survey. According to this household survey, the total.number of employed workers has decreased by about 975,000 from last August. The number of employed adult males has dropped by 900,000 while there are 669,000 .more adult females working than a year ago. The number of working teenagers has dropped by 744,000 from a year ago. The following table shows changes in the unem- ployment rate for various demographic groups and occupational Categories. U.S. Unen~olo~ent Rates (Seasonally Adjusted) Change in Group August 1981 August 1982 Unee~lojrment Rates ~$te Adult ~les S.2 ~ 7.9 % 2.7 Adult Ferules S.S 7.1 1.6 T~ge~, ~th S~es 1S.4 18.6 3.2 Black ~ult ~les 13~ 17.~ ~.~ ~ult Fmles 13.8 lS.l 1.3 l~nmgers, Both S~es 47.8 S3.1 ~it~bll~r Krke~ 3.~ 4.8 P~fesstonml mad ?~hntcml ~.S 3.1 .6 ~nagers and A~tntstre~rs 2.7 3.8 1.1 ~les Workers 4.7 5.5 Clerical Workers 5.7 ~.7 1.O Blue-Collar ~rke~ 9.5 14.~ 4.7 Craft 7.0 lO.G 3.6 ~eratives, except lrmns~rt ll.1 17.5 T~ns~rt E~i~nt ~erattves 8.0 1~.5 4.5 Nonfam La~rs 13.~ 17.4 4.2 Se~tce ~rkers 8.g 10.5 1.6 Fmm ~rkers ~.4 ~.g 1.5 Source: Bureau ot' Lal~r Statistics, U.S. I)epertzent of Labor Three Month Outlook Over the next three months little change is anticipated in the unemployment rate. Employment is expected to show some seasonal improvement due to the resumption of the school year. However, little additional growth beyond seasonal increases is an- ticipated due to poor demand from both consumers and industry.. Falling interest rates, while a reflection of weak demand for borrowed money, also offers some hope of increased consumer spending for durable goods and residential construction in the distant future. Percent ~loyed Percent Unemployment Rates (Not Seasonally Adjusted) Unemployed 9-- Annual Average Monthly Pates ;' '"'%";" -9 8-- .* ". '.. ... U.S,.'" ~.-% -8 7-- J '" ' I \~/ -7 : "-. u.s....' ~ / 6- ." ..... .. .: .~\ .....~/~ ~ \ / _~ 5-- .' *-.." // ~ % lqtnn./ ' ~---5 ~ Rols..St. Paul L3 37 lqpls.-St, paul SHSA 27 S~A --2 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 7g 80 81 `1 F lq Alq`1 `lA $ 0 N O`1 Flq A Iqd,1 A 5 0 N 0 1981 1982 CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONS !MING UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE The number of .unemployment insurance claimants increased by 557 in August from a month ago. The 1.9 percent in- crease this month compares to a past five-year average July to August change of -5.6 percent. Decreases in manufac- turing ~{particularly electrical ma- chinery}, and transportation, communi- cation, and public utilities were off- set by increases in all other indus- tries, with services (211 additional claims), and trade (1,217 additional claims} charting the largest increases. The large increase in trade is probably- due to a seasonal slowdown, as well as poor overall economic conditions. Following the trend of the past several months, August figures show a dramatic. increase from a year ago, with an addi- tional 13,656 claimants. With the ex- ception of public administration, all ncStries and occupations show in- ses from August, 1981. The largest eases were in'manufacturing (espe- cially metals and machinery), services, and trade, with 5,982, 3,299, and 2,Q65 additional claims, respectively. Ser- vice'industry claimants increased be- cause of school layoffs, as well as layoffs in personal, business, health, and social services. The graph to the right shows the impact of the 1980 recession and the recovery of 1981 and the recession of 1981-82 on "blue-collar" and "white-collar" occu- pations. It points out differences in both intensity and timing on these occupational groups. The number of "white-collar" claimants is 83.9 per- cent higher than August, 1981, reflect- ing service and trade industry lay- offs. The number of claimants in "blue -collar" occupations is 80.5 percent higher than last year due, in large part, to the layoffs in manufacturing. r 04ARACT£RiSTIC~ OF ll([ INSURfD UMD~kOY£D (Regular ~eftts P~r~) W~k E~tn~ Percent C~nge I~ust~ Ind F~: Percent Pe~ent 1/ ~m~tio~l ~nth YeAr of kon9-Te~ Pe~ent At~c~nt N~r Ago ~o lotml ~mploy~ lo~l, All l~ustries 30,274 1.9 8~.2' l~.O 2S.5 3B.7 ~nstmctton 2,830 2.3 3~.7 g.) 18.3 ~.8 hnuflc~rtn9 10,7~ -1.5 125.3 35.5 31.4 33.3 ~r~ble ~ds 8,574 -0.3 143.0 28.3 30.4 29.8 ~ndurlble ~s ~,l~ -6.1 75.1 7.2 35,2 41.1 ~blt: Utilities 1,S99 -1.2 B7.2 S.3 ~.S 2B.8 W~lesmle Trmde 2,370 6.~ lS.6 7.8 28.3 29.7 Re,il Trmde 3,413 S.S SO.S ll.) Fin., Ins., mhd ~il ~ 1,~ 2.4 72.9 3.6 3B.1 Se~tces 7,269 3.0 83.1 24.0 17.3 S9.3 ~blt: ~tn. 450 5.9 -0.7 1.S 28.~ ~.4 All ~her 173 16.9 ~.B 0.6 23.1 17.9 Inf. ~t Available 328 30.2 1~.3 1.1 1.8 37.2 lobl, All ~cupmtton$ ~ 30,274 1.9 B2.2 l~.O 2~.5 38.7 Prof., lech., ~r. (,751 5.0 g8.2 22.3 21.6 47.8 ~lert~l 4,603 5.3 75.7 ~ 15.2 27.0 77.4 ~les 1,282 4.7 U.1 ~ 4.2 30.4 30.g Settee 2,317 8.9 74.9 7.7 22.2 45.5 F~m., For., F~sh. ~ 4.8 39.7 0.3 18.2 21.6 P~essJng 521 -27.9 ~2.9 1.7 31,7 17.5 ~cht~ Trides 3,~3 1.0 107.9 10.1. ~.8 16.5 ~rk 3,950 -2.6 137.7 13.0 32.3 SO.O St~c~r~l ~rk 3,810 1.8 56.5 12.6 20.6 5.2 Mtscel lmn~us 3,812 -1.2 ~.0 12.6 25.9 17.2 ]nf. Mot Available 97 11.5 70.Z 0.3 ~8.6 42.3 gO~: Peerages ~ ~t ~ ~ ~.0 due ~ i~e~ent ~(~. ~ Long-Te~ un~plo~ ~fers ~ un~plo~nt insurance clmtmnts cu~ent s~ll of un~plo~nt ~s l~sted 15 ~ks or longer. +3OO +250 +~00 +150 +100 +SO 0 -10 12-P~nth Percent Chmnge In 'Blue-Coller' and 'White-Collar' Unemployment Insurance Cl&tmnts, Minneapolis-St. Paul SMSA, 1980 - 1982 'Blue-~ollar' .... White-Collar" 1980 1982 EMPLOYMENTAND EARNINGS CONDITIONS Developments from Last Month Overall weakness in the labor market was again evident in the August estimates of nonagricultural wage and salary Jobs. The manufacturing sector posted a gain of 1,700 jobs this past month. While the July to August increase is still below the .average for the past twelve years, it is in welcome contrast to the downward trend of the past year. Among other industry groups, the construction and service indus- tries added jobs but at a slower rate than usual, while greater than usual cutbacks were registered in the government sector. The trade industry showed no change in the number of jobs between July and August. Over the past twelve years retail trade has generally expanded its work force by about 750 jobs between July and August. Nationally, retail sales fell nine-tenths of 1 percent in August due mostly to a drop in car sales. Although some of the July tax cut has'been offset by tax in- creases at the State and local level, the combination of lower inflation, lower in- terest rates, and higher disposable income should eventually result in an accelera- tion of consumer spending. At the present time, however, the typical consumer is being very cautious, a reflection of his current financial situation and concern about the future of the economy. Developments from a Year Ago Compared to this time a year ago, the estimated number of wage and salary jobs in the Twin Cities area has fallen in every industry category, with the exception of the service industry group. To give some perspective to the impact of the recession on various industries, we have compiled the following table. The table shows the percent change in Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area wage and salary employment {seasonally adjusted) for four recessions. The peak to trough period refers to the month during the recession at which total nonagricultural wage and salary employment was at its highest before declining to the trough or lowest point. Following the trough, total employment began to recover, although employment in some individual industry group may have continued to fall for several months. INDUSTRY Total Wage and Salary Employment Manufacturing Construction Transportation, Conmuntcatton and Public Utilities 'Trade Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Services Gover~nent Percent Change in Employment From Peak to Trough March '70- Oct. '74- March '80- July '81- Nov. '70 ~pril 'TS Jul~ '80 Jul~ '82' -4.5% -3.1% -1.1% -3.0% -14.5 -ll.3 -4.4 -4.9 -13.2 -17.9 -4.2 -11.4 -7.9 -4.3 -2.5 -5.1 -1.0 0.0 -1.4 -2.4 0.6 0.2 -0.3 -0.7 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.3 5.8 2.0 1.O -4.0 July 1982 is being use~ as the trough month although it is uncertain whether or not employment )md actually bottomed out. The table above shows that the current recession has affected employment consider- ably more than the 1980 recession but not as much as the two previous recessions. However, two factors may be distorting the figures for the 1981-82 recession. First of all, the 1981-82 recession was preceded by the shortest and weakest recovery ~eriod in the post-World War II period. Secondly, interest rates have remained at very high levels throughout the recession, in contrast to previous post-war down- turns. The combination of these two factors has meant that the housing industry and manufacturers of credit-sensitive goods, such as automobiles, have sustained a much longer period of recession than the overall economy. As a result of this "double- dip recession" on these industries, construction employment is 28.6 percent lower in August 1982 than in August 1979 and manufacturing employment is 7.7 percent lower over the same period. {Continued on pa~e 8} A% ? 4 EMPLOYMENT, HOURS NqD EARNINGS tn the t4tnneapolts-St. Paul 14etropolttan Arel PERCENT PRODUCTION I~ORKERS' HOURS & EtCPLOY~ENT C~4ANGE . INDUSTRY (000) FROI~ Average Weekly Average Hourly Average Mrekly Earnings Earnings Hours Aug. Month Year ~¢onth Year Aug. Month Aug.' Month Aug. Honth 1982 Ago Ago Ago Ago 1982 Ago 1962 Ago 1982 Ago TOTAL NONAGRICULTURAL 1057.5 1058.4! 1084.6 -0.1 -2.5 XX XX XX XX XX HANUFACTURIN$ 234.4 232.7 245.8 0.7 -4.7 374.03 373.83 9.64 9.61 38.8 38.9 Durable &oods 150.0 148.6 158.0 0.9 -5.0 375.83 380.00 9.54 9.50 39.5 40.0 Lumber & ~ood Products 4.8 4.7 4.51 1.5 6.1 418.00 473.47 10.45 10.0~ 40.0 47.3 Furetture & Fixtures 1.7 1.$ 1.7 4.3 -2.8 325.62 308.89 8.08 7.90 40.3 39.1 Store, Clay & Glass 2.9 2.9 3.2 -1.1 -8.9 361.50 387.47 9.64' 9.76 37.5 39.7 Prtmry Petals 3.8 3.8 4.4 0.9 -12.1 308.65 317.77 8.67 8.73 35.6 35.4 Fabricated Iqetals 26.2 26.1 27.5 0.4 -4.8 442.38 444.96 10.95 10.80 40.4 41.2 Non-Lrlectrtcel I~chtrery 60.2 59.4 M.O 1.3 -6.0 370.21 357.15 9.42 9.39 39.3 39.1 Electrical P~achtnery 18.2 18.0 18.7 1.0 -2.9 347.54 355.59 8.55 8.61 40.5 41.3 Transportation Equipment 3.9 3.9 3.7 0.5 7.8 454.10 437.80 11.13 11.00 40.8 39.8 Other Durables1_/ 28.4 28.2 30.3 0.7 -6.4 342.00 343.93 8.86 8.91 38.6 38.6 Mondurable Goods 84.4 84.1 87.9 0.3 -4.0 359.23 363.21 9.82 9.79 37.6 37.1 Food & Kindred Products 18.9~ 18.8 19.1 0.7 -1.1 336.01 345.60 8.66 9.00 38.8 38.4 Textiles & Apparel 2.2 2.3 3.4 -1.5 -34.8 187.53 191.79 5.03 5.05 31.1 31.7 Paper &Allted Products 24.0 24.3 24.5 -1.1 -2.0 411.88 402.52 10.12 9.89 40.7 40.7 Prlntlng & Publishing 23.7 23.8 24.0 -0.2 -1.1 380.76 363.48 10.91 10.85 34.9 33.5 Chemtcal Products 6.3 6.1 6.5 3.1 -4.0 388.13 369.41 10.35 10.29 37.5 35.9 Petroleum Products 1.6 1.5 1.5 2.9 4.1 492.80! 458.96 11.20' 10.98 44.0 41.8 Rubber & Leather Products 7.7 7.4 8.8 3.3 -13.0 323.10 329.7: 8.95 9.01 36.1 36.6 NONI4ANUFACTURI N& 823.1 825.7 838.7 -0.3 -1.9 XX XX XX XX XX XX CONSTRUCTION 38.2 37.9 43.1 0.7 -11.3 556.03 548.24 15.35 15.40 35.2 35.6 Butldtng Construction 10.8 10.6 12.4 Z.1 -12.& 538.19 545.07 14.39 14.64 37.4 37.3 I~lgh~ay & 14eavy Construction 5.3 5.3 6.3 O.g -15.2 548.57 459.62 14.n3 13.40 39.1 34.3 Spectal Trades Contracting 22.0 22.0 Z4.4 0.0 -9.7 566.87 557.57 16.15 16.17 35.1 35.1 TRANS PORTATIO~ 38.4 !: 38.5 40.8 -0.2 -5.9 XX XX XX XX XX XX Railroads 7.0 7.0 7.8 0.0 -10.0 448.84 448.84 9.39 9.39 47.8 47.8 Trucking & itarehoustng 13.6 13.5 14.4 0.7 -5.8 427.85 423.81 12.33 12.32 34.7 34.4 PIJIILIC UTILITIES & COFM. 20.2 20.4 21.0 -0.8 -3.9 436.85 437.47 11.23 11.16 38.9 39.2 TRAOE 262.7 262.6 270.2 0.0 -2.8 220.76 219.77 7.31 7.35 30.2 29.9 Retail Trade 191.1 190.8! 194.4 0.1 -1.7 177.47 175.34 6.43 6.47 27.6 27.1 General Morchandise Stores 31.4 31.7 31.8 -0.8 -1.1 176.11 175.22 5.89 5.88 2g.9 29.8 Food Stores 26.7 26.6 26.8 0.6 -0.3 239.83 240.22 8.27 8.37 29.0 28.7 Eattng& Ortnktng Places 63.2 62.5J 64.2 1.1 -1.6 96.60 85.44 4.60 4.45 21.0 19.2 14holes&1e '~rade 71.7 71.8 75.8 -0.2 -5.4 362.62 366.13 9.37 g.34 38.7 39.2 FINANCE, INS. &-REAL ESTATE 73.0 73;1 73.61 -0.2 -0.8 Ft hence 31.0 31.0 30.8 0.0 0.7 Insurance 28.9 29.1 29.4' -0.5 Real Estate 13.1 13.1 13.4 0.1 -2.5 SERVICE & I~ISCELLA~EOUS 251.0 249.9 244.7: 0.4 2.6 Bustress & Personal Servtces 61.3 61.1 59.8 0.2 2.4 Repatr Servtces 11.6 11.6 12.0 0.2 -2.8 I~edtcal Servtces 74.1 74.1 72.2 0.1 2.6 Hospitals 31.9 32.0 31.8 -0.1 0.3 Rurstng I~es 20.2 20.2 19.9 0.2 1.4 GOVEPJ~ENT 139.61 143.3 145.3 -2.5 -3.9 Federal 18.4 18.3 18.3 0.2 0.6 State 39.6 39.9 41.1 -0.7 -3.7 Local 81.6 85.0 85.9 -4.0 -5.0 Less than .05 1_/ Includes Scientific Instruments and Miscellaneous ~anufacturtng 2_/ Average earnings data are on a "gross" basis and are dertved from reports of payroll for full- and part-time production or nonsupervlsory workers. The padre11 ts reported before deductions of any ktnd. Bonuses, acttve POV, tips, payment tn kind, and "frtngo benefits" are excluded. Source: Current Emplo~nent Statistics Program (Ftgures rounded to nearest hundred) THE JOB MARKET This month's Job Market section focuses on the wholesale trade industry, a group of establishments which sell goods and provide a variety of services to retail esta- blishments and industrial, com~ericial, farm, and professional businesses. In the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area there were over 5,300 wholesale trade opera- tions which employed 71,700 workers in August. As the graph below illustrates, the industry has generally weathered economic recessions well because o~ the diversity of products and customers. However, high inflation and interest rates and lower productivity in recent years have squeezed profits for wholesalers nationwide. In response, many wholesalers have computerized many office and warehouse functions to contain costs and improve service to the customer. Some cutbacks of the workforce have also been necessary because of slack demand. Minneapolis-St. Paul Wholesale Trade Industry Employment Tren~ of Twin City Wholesale Trade ..... Empl o)~nent 1970-81 BLS High Trend Version 1 ................... BLS Low Tren~ '7S '78 '79 '80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 Projections of employment in the wholesale trade industry to 1990 show that employ- ment growth is expected to moderate from the trend of the past decade. Twin Cities area wholesale trade employment correlates highly with its U.S. counterpart over the past eleven years. Therefore, the alternative 1990 wholesale trade employment pro- jections are based on two scenarios for U.S. economic growth to 1990 prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The projections are intended to provide a range within which economic growth will most likely occur, but they should not be interpreted as being representative of all likelihoods. The BLS alternatives do not attempt to forecast cyclical fluctuations during the 1980's. Computer systems will continue to be installed in order to improve inventory management and productivity. The Economic Recovery Tax Act should encourage further equipment purchases and capital investment over the decade. Such automation and computerization is expected to have the greatest impact on the demand for laborers and clerical workers. There are several types of establishments in the wholesale trade industry. The most con, non is the merchant wholesaler - a wholesaler who takes title to the goods he sells. These firms tend to be small, independent, and competitive in nature. tionally, merchant wholesalers make up about 80 percent of all the firms and over three-fourths of the employment in the industry. A second type of wholesale trade establishment is a sales branch or sales office maintained by a manufacturing firm apart from their manufacturing facility for the purpose of marketinq their products. A third type' of wholesaler is the agent, merchandise or con~nodity br~ker, and com- mission merchant. As the following table on the occupational staffing pattern of the'industry shows, employment in wholesale trade is diverse in nature. While the sales representative is the single largest occupation, there are many workers employed in the distribu- tion, marketing, and record-keeping aspects of the industry. The diversity of occu- pations shows that many wholesalers provide not only goods but also price marking, credit, inventory management, computer services, and marketing support such as ad- vertising and label design. Staffing Pattern o~ Minnesota's Wholesale Trade Industry, June 1979 Top Fifteen Occupations June, 1979 Estimated Percent Occupational Estimated Employment' Distribution Tltle .Employment TOTAL ALL OCCUPATIONS 120,$00 lO0.O 1. Sales Representative, Technical ii,590 2. Sales Representative, Non- 8,580 Ma~gertal 10,870 g.O technical 3. Mechanics and Repairers 8,000 Professional 8,610 7.1 4. Truck Driver 6,430 5. General Clerk, Office 6,390 Technical 3,570 3.0 6. Order Filler 4,960 ?. Manager, Merchandise 4,850 Service 1,910 1.6 8. Stock Clerk, Stockroom 4,220 9. Secretary 3,590 Product4on and 10. Wholesaler 3,150 Maintenance 41,990 34.8 ll. Delivery or Route Worker 2,970 12. Buyer 2,500 Clertcml 32,410. 26.9 13. Order Clerk 2,470 14. Maintenance and Production Sales 21,240 17.6 Supervisor 2,180 15. Bookkeeper 2,100 Source: lg7g Occupational Employment Statistics tn Minnesota, Research Office, Minnesota Department of Economic Security MINNESOTA DEPARTI~NT OF ECONOMZC SECURZTY APPLICANT O~ARACTERZSTICS N40 CONDITXONS HI~EAPOLIS-ST. PAUL S~A - AUGUST, 1982 RATi~ OF EXPERIENCED APPLICAKTS. OCCUPATION EXPERIENCED APPLICANTS TO UNFILLED ~OB OPENZNG$ % Change of Total App. 1981 1982 .... Total . Female M~nortty from Month Age AUG. DEC. I~AR. JUNE ~UtY AUG. T__otal, All Occupations 41,984 17,093 $,190 -4.9 6.1- 12.6 8.7 8.9 8.6 7.1 Professional, Technical, Mo~gerial 7,264 2,984 611 2.9 8.1 12.1 9.5 8.0 8.4 7.0 Clertcal 7,923 6,312 ~18 1.5 7.5 8.6 7.4 6.1 6.4 5. D ~1e$ 1,866 737 I11 -2,0 1.9 4.3 2.0 2.9 2.4 2.0 Semite 6,350 3,312 1,197 -2.9 8.9 22.7 6.6 11.3 8.8 7.3 Fa~tng, Forcstry, Ftshtng 439 88 97 -10.0 1.6 118.0 48.8 4.9 7.7 7.4 P~esslng 822 177 124 -0.1 7.4 11.9 Il.7 9.1 9.5 7.8 Macht~ Trades 3,406 561 370 2.7 14.6 23.3 19.6 17.3 16.3 15.1 Be~rk.- 3,243 1,828 691 1.0 14.4 17.4 16.4 16.9 15.4 14.7 St~ctural 4,334 2D7 378 -2.3 110.3 24.4 24.4 20.1 18.3 16.9 i~r Freight, Trans~rtatton 1,669 96 141 -2.1 !lS.O 21.2 18.4 15.9 14.6 11.7 Pac~gtng, Material I~ndltng 4,340 714 726 -33.3 2.9* 14.1 12.5 10.6 17.4 Other 328 87 26 -2.4 11.8 14.7 15.9 14.4 12.9 10.6 Source: ESARS Table 96 *Ratio is much smaller than usual because of temporary State Fair openings tncTudod tn 'Packaging, Material Handling' category. EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS CONDITIONS (cont.) Three Month Outlook During the upcoming three month period, seasonal factors will cause wage and salary employment to rebound. First of all, public and private educational service employ- ment will rise as school resumes in September. Retail trade employment should grow gradually over the three month period as the holidays grow nearer. Construction em. ployment should remain stable before beginning to decline as winter nears. Manufac- turing employment will probably fluctuate from month to month. At the present time, a sustained recovery in manufacturing is not anticipated until early to mid-lg83. The table shows several other points which distinguish the 1981-82 recession from previous ones. Probably because of the high interest rates and the uncertain Job outlook, retail sales have been very sluggish and has resulted in greater job cut- backs in the trade sector. Perhaps the most noticeable difference in the 1981-82 recession has been the behavior of government employment. Unlike previous reces- sions in which government employment continued to grow, budget cuts have trimmed payrolls, especially in local and state government. INCOME AND PRICE CONDITIONS A11 ~v.~ ~fim ~ 1.S 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.3 10.3 7.2 ~t~11ar ~rkm 1.e 1.8 2.2 1.7 1.~ 10.2 7.2 I1~11ir ~ ~.3 2.2 i.8 1.S 1.3 I0.S 7.0 ~. ~e. 0.7 1.~ 1.Z 3.5 1.1 10.1 7.~ ~fa~ t~t~es ~.O ~.1 1.~ 1.~ 1.1 10.S 7.Z ~n~lc~l~ t~es 1.6 2.0 I.~ 1.7 1.3 10.2 7,1 is st~SgK-ttm i~ ~ly fl~l~, ~ ~1o~ ~ for ~10~ ~ ~I~s ~v.~ ~Id ~, ~ the Consumer h'lce Index* August 1N1 - August 1~62 fllme~l~lts-St, hul U.S. Ctt), A11 I tmltS 9.2 5.8 Food i~ Deterges 3.S 3.S ~st~ 14.1 Ap~r~l and Upke~ 3.4 1,S T~ns~4't~t tN 4.6 4.S I~(ltc~l CaM ll.g 11.0 [n~m't~tme~t S.3 S.4 The deceleration in rates of increase f~r both compensation costs'and for wages and salaries that began in 1981 continued to be widespread among occupational and industrial groups mea- sured by the Employment Cost Index. Wages for workers in the construction industry ro~e 1.3 percent in the March-June 1982 period compared to an average second quarter increase of between 2 and 3 percent over the past 5 years. Compensation costs for State and local govern- ment employees, introduced in June 1981, in- creased 9.3 percent over the year. ' WE ARE MOVING After November 1, the Twin Cities LMI Center will be located at 390 North Robert Street. Our telephone number will remain the same. ARCHDIOCESE OF SAINT PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS Community Development Corporation October 12, 1982 Board of Directors Westonka Elderly and Handicapped Housing. Corporation Dear Board blember: 328 West Sixth Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55,102 612-291 - i 750 FOR We are pleased that you have accepted the appointment from the Community Development Corporation to serve on the Board of Directors of Westonka Elderly and Handi- capped Housing, Inc. As a representative of the community, your involvement in providing this type of housing is critical since the development will-become an asset to your community. " Enclosed is a-copy of the reservation of funds received from H.U.D., along with the notice of a Board meeting on Tuesday, October 19, 1982. Also enclosed for your records is a copy of the Articles and By-Laws of the corporation. Should yOu have any questions prior to the Board meeting, please feel free to call me. ~l~m~t Coordinator JR:jr Attachments: (1) Reservation of funds letter (2) Notice of Meeting (3) Articles and By-Laws of Corporation (4) Minutes of Meeting, June 28, 1982 recipient agency of the Annual Catholic Appeal NOTICE OF MEETING WESTONKA ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED HOUSING CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTOR Tuesday, October 26, 1982 7:30 P.M. blound City Hall AGENDA 1) Approval of Agenda 2) Approval of Minutes of Last Meeting (Oct. 19, 1982) 3) Architect Discussions (Ed Kodet) 4) Interviews of Prospective Contractor s) 6) 7) A) B) Frana Construction C) Open Time Other Business: Schedule Next Meeting Adjournment Bor-Son Construction 7:45 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 8:15 P.M. MINUTES OF MEETING OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WESTONKA ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED HOUSING CORPORATION The undersigned, being all the members of the first Board of Directors of Westonka Elderly and Handicapped Housing Corporation, do hereby adopt the following resolutions in writing, pursuant to the provisions of Section 317.20, subd. 12, of Minnesota Statutes: 1. RESOLVED, that Bylaws in the form attached hereto are hereby adopted as the Bylaws of this corporation, and the Secretary is instructed to place the original Bylaws in the Minute Book as a part of the permanent records of the corporation. 2. RESOLVED, that the following persons hereby are elected to the following offices: Joseph A. L. Erri~o, Jr. John L. Rocheford, Jr. Jerome Halloran President Executive Vice President Secretary-Treasurer Dated: June 28, 1982 / Joseph ~,~. Errigo, Jr. ~ j~?r~ran/~ REGION V SEP 2 4 1982 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL AREA OFFICE 220 SECOND STREET SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 IN REPLY REFER TO: Mr..John L. Rocheford, Jr. Executive Vice President Westonka Elderly and Handicapped Housing Corporation 328 West Sixth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Mr. Rocheford: Subject: Notification of Selection of a Section 202 Fund Reservation Project No. 092-EH169-WAH Section 8 No. MN46-T821-043 Westonka Estates I am pleased to advise you that your Application,--dated June 29, 1982 to construct 42 units of housing at Mound, Minnesota under the Section 202 Direct Loan Program has been approved. Loan authority in the amount of $1,603,000 has been reserved for this project, along with Section ~ annual contributions authority of $229,212. Please indicate by signing in. the space'provided whether or not you accept this notification including the special conditions Or requirements that are specified herein. In either case, return two signed copies to this office within 15 days from the date of this notification. : FUND RESERVATION TERMS AND CONDITIONS Your acceptance of this Notification constitutes a certification and agreement that: 1. There will not be made any sale, assignment, conveyance, Or any other form of transfer of this Notification, the property, or any interest, thereof. 2. The Fund Reservation will be canceled if construction or substantial rehabilitation approved by HUD has not commenced within 18 months from the date of this Notice, unless an extension of time, not to exceed six months, is granted by this office. 3. The SeCtion 202 fund reservation shall not be available for use.in con- nection with a Section 8 project which previously had been processed by the field office without regard to the use of Section 202 funds. 4. It should be understood this letter places upon the Borrower the respon- sibility to develop a viable project. The loan reservation and annual assis- tance funds recited above do not reflect appraised land value or other conclu- sive cost estimates, operating expense estimates or final credit or financial analysis. These determinations will be made at the next stage of processing. 5. Special Conditions: a. This Notification of Selection is issued subject to clearance of your Form 2530, Previous Participation Certification for the Borrower, Sponsor and Consultant. b. All one bedroom units must be designed with a maximum of 540 square feet; two bedroom units with a maximum of 800 square feet° The com- munity space shall not exceed Handbook guidelines. The building overall should be of modest design. ~' c. Not later than October 20, 1982, provide.assurance that all conditions for release of the property by the Knights of Columbus as out- lined in their letter of June 29, 1982 will be met before submission of your application for conditional commitment on December 15, 1982. ToProvide you and your architect with assistance in the development of a proposal which meets HUD Minimum Property Standards, please contact Arthur Hultgren at 349-3145, our design representative, to discuss the design of the proposal. In addition, he is to be consulted regularly during the development of the plans and specifications of the project so that as few problems occur as possible at subsequent stages of processing. Natural gas space heating and hot water must be used if available. If not available, the utility combinati°n must be approved in writing by this office. Contact your multifamily housing representative prior to submitting your application for conditional commitment. Please be advised HUD~will again permit the Sponsor to select a general contractor on a negotiated basis. You are requested to submit to this office not later than December 15, 1982, a Request for Conditional Commitment for Direct Loan Financing in accord- ance with the provisions of Chapter 5 of Handbook 4571.1 Rev. INFORMATIONAL SESSION ON SECTION 202 PROCESSING Ail sponsors and consultants for Section 202 projects which received funding reservations from the 1982 Fiscal Year set-aside are required to attend an in- formational session on October 20, 1982, at the HUD office located at 220 South Second Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota. The session will begin in the training room at 9:30 a.m. and will last until approximately 1:00 p.m.. The session will include information on the Section 202 proposal review process, and we will be setting processing goals for each project. There will be ample opportunity for you to ask questions. It is important to the success of each housing project that processing occur in a timely fashion. We request that the Sponsor's project contact personnel, Architect and Consultant attend the meeting. Due to space limitation, we would like to limit the number of people representing each project to a maximum of five. Please return the enclosed registration form by October 12, 1982 listing the names of the individuals who will be attending. 0 If you do not return two signed copies of this Notification by the specified date, or if you accept but fail to submit a Request for Conditional Commitment by the specified date, HUD may rescind this Notification and cancel the Section 202 direct loan reservation and the Section 8 Annual Contributions Authority. ~ If you have any questions, please contact LoAnn Crepeau, Multifamily Housing Representative assigned to your project, at telephone (612) 349- 3108. We look forward to seeing you on Wednesday, October 20th, at 9:30 a.m. Sincerely, John L~ Rochefozd ~ . Accept · . /~ / ~ ~ Not Accept. /~g'natur& '-- /- ''/~ Date Signature Titl;e ..... - ' Title -Date ¥ 009 /I\ :]~hl~rl~a~i, Articles of Incorporation, duly signed and acknowledged under oath, have been recorded in the office of the Secretary of State, on day of June , A. D. 19.82 ~or the incorporation Westonka Elderly and Handicapped Housing Corporation. under and in accordance with the provisions of the Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 317; ~nm, i[h~r[tfl3r£,by virtue of the powers and duties vested in me by law, as Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota, I do hereby certify that the said W e s hQ rkk a_Elderly_ a~ld_~cap~u$ilug Corporation. .. is a legally organized Corporation under the laws o~ this State. SC-O0019-0 2 Witness my oficial signature hereunto sub- scribed and the Great Seal o~ the State of Minnesota hereunto affixed this 28th day o} ~lune in the year o~ our Lord one thousand nine hundred_anc~iohtv~two / / ¥/ - ecretary o State. ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF WESTONKA ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED HOUSING CORPORATION I, the undersigned, of full age, for the purpose of forming a corporation under, and pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 317 of Minnesota statutes, do hereby set forth the following Articles of Incorporation: ARTICLE I. The name of this corporation shall be Westonka Elderly and Handicapped Housing Corporation. ARTICLE Iio This corporation is organized exclusively for charitable Purposes, including the promotion of the welfare of elderly or handicapped families and the provision, on a nonprofit basis, of housing and related facilities for persons and families of low and very low income, as well as others, including persons and families displaced from urban renewal areas or as a result of governmental action. No part of the activities of the corporation shall consist of carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation. The corporation shall not participate in or intervene in, including the publishing or distributing of statements, any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. The corporation shall have all the powers conferred by the laws of the State of Minnesota, including power to execute a Regulatory Agreement with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development acting by and through the Federal Housing Commissioner, and to execute such other instruments and undertakings as may be necessary to enable the corporation to secure the benefits of financing with the assistance of mortgage insurance under the provisions of the National Housing Act, as amended. Such Regulatory Agreement and other instruments and undertakings shall remain binding upon the corporation, its successors and assigns, so long as a mortgage on the corporation's'property is insured or held by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Notwithstanding any other provisions of these articles, the corporation shall not c~rry on any activities not permitted to be carried on (a) by a corporation exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (or the corresponding provisions of any future United States Internal Revenue law) or (b) by a corporation, contributions to which are deductible under Section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (or the corresponding provisions of any future Unfted States Internal Revenue law). ARTICLE III. This corporation shall not afford pecuniary gain, incidentally or otherwise, to its members. ARTICLE IV. The duration of existence of this corporation shall be perpetual. ARTICLE V. The location of the registered office of this corporation in the State of Minnesota shall be at Saint Paul, Minnesota. ARTICLE VI. The name and address-.of the .incorporator of this corporation is Jerome Halloran, E-1500 First National Bank Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101. ARTICLE VII. The general management of this corporation shall be vested in the members who shall constitute its directors2 The names and addresses of the first members and directors are as follows: Joseph A. L. Errigo, Jr. 900 Lincoln Avenue Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104 Jerome Halloran E-1500 First National Bank Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 John L. Rocheford, Jr. 328 West Sixth Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Each of the above members and directors shall continue as a member and director until his death, removal or resignation as a member and director. A member and director of this corporation may be removed by Community Development Corporation for the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis at any time with or without cause. ARTICLE VIII. The members of this corporation shall not be subject to any extent whatsoever to personal liability for corporate obligations. ARTICLE IX. This corporation shall have no capital stock. ARTICLE X. Ail of this .corporation's property and all of its net earnings shall be distributed, used and applied at the discretion of its members in such amount and at such times as its members may determine for the purposes for which this corporation was created; provided, however, that no part of the net earnings of this corporation shall inure to the benefit of any .private member or individual, except that this corporation shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services rendered and to make payments and distributions in furtherance of the purposes set forth in Article II hereof. ARTICLE XI. Upon the dissolution of this corporation, the Board of Directors shall, after paying or ma~ing provision for the payment of all of the liabilities of this corporation, dispose of all of the assets of this corporation exclusively for the purposes of this corporation in such manner, or to such organization or organizations organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, religious or scientific purposes as shall at the time qualify as an exempt organization or organizations under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and Section 290.05, Subd. 2 of Minnesota Statutes, or any amendments to such sections or substitutes therefor on the date of such payment, as the Board of Directors shall determine. Any such assets not so disposed of shall be disposed of by the District Court of the .county in which the principal office of this corporation is then located, exclusively for such purposes or to such organization or organizations, as said court shall determine, which are organized and operated exclusively for such purposes. ARTICLE XIIo The Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of this corporation may be amended as provided by law, except that Article VII hereof may not be amended unless, in addition to the other requirements of law, Community Development Corporation for the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis shall have consented to the said amendment. IN ~ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ ~ da~ of June, 1982. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss, COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this~~ay of June, 1982, before me personally appeared JEROME HALLORAN, to me ~known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. ,~,--'~ K,rolyn 5. Ar~erson BYLAWS OF WESTONKA ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED HOUSING CORPORATION ARTICLE I. Members Section 1.1 Class of Members. There shall be but one (1) class of members, and their voting and other rights, interests and privileges shall be equal. Section 1.2 Members as Directors. The members of this corporation shall also serve as directors of this corporation. Section 1.3 Number of Members. The number of members of this corporation shall be not less than five (5) nor more than thirteen (13) Following that date when the rental apartment units owned by this corporation are 95% occupied, then a majority of the members of this corporation shall be elected by the adult residents living in such apartment units. The remaining members shall be appointed by Community Development Corporation for the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis (referred to in these Bylaws as "Community Development Corporation"). The members appointed by Community Development Corporation shall include at least one member from each of the communities of Mound, Minnetrista, Spring Park and Orono. Until the members to be elected by the adult residents have been so elected, and have agreed to serve as members, the members appointed by Community Development Corporation shall act as the members of this corporation. Section 1.4 Term. Each of the members appointed by Community Development Corporation shall serve for such terms as Community Development Corporation shall designate at the time of the appointment of the member. Members elected by the adult residents shall serve for an initial term, not exceeding two (2) years, as shall be designated by the residents. Upon the expiration of the first term of each of the members elected by the adult residents, the term of each member thereafter shall be for two (2) years and until his successor is elected, qualified, and has accepted. A member may be reelected or reappointed as a member. Section 1.5 Eligibility. Any natural person is eligible for membership in the corporation. There shall be no corporate members. Section 1.6 Resignation and Transfer. A member may resign at any time. No member may transfer, voluntarily or involuntarily, his or her membership or any rights arising therefrom and all such rights shall cease upon termination of his or her membership. Section 1.7 Vacancies. Any vacancy or vacancies in the member- ship, either through death, resignation, removal from office or any other reason, shall be filled by Community Development Corporation if the vacancy is a member appointed by it, or by the adult residents if the vacancy is a member elected by them. Section 1.8 Powers. In addition' to the powers and authority conferred upon them in these Bylaws, the members shall have the power to do all acts necessary and expedient to the conduct of the affairs of the cor- poration. Section 1.9 Removal. A member may be removed at any time by Community Development Coporation with or without cause.. ARTICLE II. Meetings Section 2.1 Place of Meetings° Meetings may be held at any place designated in the call of the meeting. Section 2.2 Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of the members for the election of officers and for the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting shall be held at such time and such place as may, from time to time, be designated by the members. Section 2.3 Regular Meetings° Regular meetings of the members may be held without notice at the registered office of the corporation or at such other place as may be designated, and at such time as shall from time to time be determined by the members° The President, or in his absence the Vice President, shall call such meetings. Section 2.4 Special Meetings. Special meetings of the members may be called by the President or by any two (2) members or in any manner prescribed by law. Section 2.5 Notice of Meetings. Except as otherwise provided in Section 2.3 above, written notice of each meeting of members, stating the time and place thereof, and, in the case of a special meeting, the purpose thereof, shall be given not less than five (5) days in advance to each member. Section 2.6 Waiver of Notice. Any member may make written waiver of notice of any meeting, before, at or after the meeting. Appearance at a meeting is deemed a waiver of notice thereof, unless it is solely for the purpose of asserting the irregularity of the meeting. Section 2.7 Quorum. The presence of four (4) members, or, if there are more than eight (8) members, the presence of one-half (1/2) of the members, shall constitute a quorum for all purposes unless the representation of a larger number be required by law, in which case the representation of the humber so required shall constitute a quorum. Section 2.8 'Votin~ Rights. At all meetings, each member shall have one (1) vote. Proxies shall not be permitted at meetings of members. There shall be no cumulative voting. Unless otherwise provided by law, a majority of the votes cast shall govern in every election and matter voted upon. Section 2.9 Action Without Meeting. Any action which may be taken by the members at a meeting of members may be taken without a meeting if authorized by a writing or writings signed by all of the members who would be entitled to vote at such meeting, and such action shall be effective on the date on which the last signature is placed on such writing or writings, or such earlier effective date as is set forth therein. ARTICLE III. Officers Section 3.1 Designation and Election. At the annual'meeting, the members shall elect a President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer, and any other officers and agents deemed to be necessary. Each officer shall be of full age. Any of the offices or functions of the offices may be held or exercised by the same person. The President and Vice President shall be members but none of the other officers need be a member. year. terms. Section 3.2 Term. Each officer shall serve for a term of one (1) An officer may be elected to succeed himself for a succeeding term or Section 3.3 Duties of President. The President shall preside at all such meetings of the members, and he shall have the powers and perform such additional duties as may be assigned to him by resolution of the members. Section 3.4 Duties of Vice President. The Vice President shall have the powers and perform the duties'of the President during the absence or inability of the President to act, and he shall have such additional po~ers and perform such additional duties as may be assigned to him by resolution of the members. Section 3.5 Duties of Secretary. The Secretary shall keep the minutes of all meetings of the members and shall attest the same by his signature. He shall attend to the giving and serving of all notices of the corporation, he shall keep and have charge of such other books and papers of the corporation as the members may direct,.and in general, he shall perform all duties incident to the office of Secretary, subject to the control of the members. Section 3.6 Duties of Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have custody of the corporate funds and securities and shall keep full and accurate account of the receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the corporation, shall deposit all monies and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the corporation in such depositories as may be designated by the members, shall take all action necessary and proper for the collection and payment of obligations on behalf of the corporation, and'in general, shall perform all the duties incident to the office of Treasurer, subject to the control of the members. Section 3.7 Executive Vice President. Community Development Corporation may, in its discretion, appoint an Executive Vice President, who shall be the chief executive officer and shall have general charge, supervision and control of the business and affairs of the corporation, subject, however, to the control of the members. .Section 3.8 Removal of Officers. Ail officers except the Executive Vice President shall be subject to removal at any time with or without cause by the affirmative vote of the majority of all the members. The Executive Vice President may be removed only by Community Development Corporation. Vacancies occurring because of death, resignation, removal or any other reason in an office other than the Executive Vice President, may be filled by the members at any meeting. Section 3.9 Special Powers. Any officer or agent may be vested by the members with any power and charged with any duty not contrary to law or inconsistent with the Articles of Incorporation or these Bylaws. ARTICLE IV. Directors Each member of the corporation shall be a director. The term of each director shall be the. term of his membership in the corporation and the provisions relating to membership shall apply to the directors with equal force. ARTICLE V. Executive Committee Section 5.1 Members of Executive Committee. The members of the corporation, by resolution adopted by a majority of them, may designate certain of the members to constitute an Executive Committee. The designation of such Executive Committee, and the delegation of authority herein granted, shall not relieve the members of the corporation of any responsibility imposed on them by law. No member of the Executive Committee shall continue to be a member thereof after he ceases to be a member of the corporation. The members of the corporation shall have'the power at any time to change the number of members of the Executive Committee (which shall never be less.than three (3)) to fill vacancies thereon, to change any member thereof, to change the functions, or to terminate the existence thereof. Section 5.2 Authority. During the intervals between the meetimgs of the members of the corporation, and subject to such limitations as may be provided by law, these Bylaws., or by resolution of the members of the corporation, the Executive Committee shall have and may exercise all the authority of the members of the corporation in t~e management of the corporation. The Executive Committee shall make a full report of all actions to the next meeting of the members of the corporation. Section 5.3 Meetings. Meetings of the Executive Committee may be held at Such time and place as may be from time to time d~termined by the Executive Committee upon the giving of notice at least two (2) days prior to the date of the meeting. Section 5.4 Quorum. A majority of the entire Executive Committee shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and the act of the majority of the members present at such meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Executive Committee. ARTICLE VI. Certificates The corporation shall not issue membership certificates. ARTICLE VII. Corporate Seal The corporation shall have no corporate seal. ARTICLE VIII. Amendment Except as otherwise required by law, these Bylaws may be amended at any regular meeting of the members or at any special meeting called for that purpose, provided that written notice of the proposed amendment shall have been mailed at least one (1) week prior to such meeting. Such amendment. shall require an affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the members present at a duly constituted meeting. CITY of MOUND October 14, 1982 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 BUDGET ANALYS IS MOUND BAY PARK LAWCON PROJECT Shelly Nett (Designer) Office Supplies Misc. (DNR Permit) Mileage Aero Asphalt McCombs-Knutson TOTAL SPENT Committed but not Spent Projected - Dock Construction (Winter of 82-83) TOTAL BALANCE For Sodding, etc. $3,241.OO 188.41 15.OO 33.00 4,441.90 2,328.00 $10,247.31 $37,648.00 4,OOO.OO $51,895.31 $ 3,104.69 REVENUE Community Degelopment Revenue Sharing Funds TOTAL FINANCIAL REPORT DOWNTOWN STUDY COMMITTEE 1982 (9-30-82) Block Grant EXPENSES A. Services - Rob Chelseth Meetings Technical Assistance Summary Analysis.of Report Workshop Preparation Proposal Draft Proposal Reviews Architectural Selection Loan Procedures Preparation Public Meeting Organization Parking Study ( Nov. 1981) Preparation for Nov. Workshop Draft of Workshop Results Completion of Plan Draft Tota 1 of A Ce StUdy Plan Ernst & Associates : Miscellaneous. ' Diane'Arneson (SecretarY) Hennepin County Maps John Weidt - Slide Presentation Misc. Total of C TOTAL OF A, B & C $ 404.50 578.oo 695.00 400.00 200.00 200.00 1,150.OO 5o.oo 300.00 150.00 95.00 275.00 $ 4,1497.50 4,O65.10 432.'50 ':20.00 225,00 39.60 717.1o 9,279.70 $ 5,755.00 6,750.00 $ 121505.00 C.D.B.G. REVENUE SHARING 1982 FUND ANALYSIS INCOME - 5,755.00 - 6,750.00 - $12,505.OO - EXPENSES 4,497.50 4~782.20 9,279.70 = BALANCE = $ 1,357.50 = $ 1,967.80 = $ 3,225.30 FINANCIAL REPORT D01~NTOWN STUDY COMMITTEE 1981 REVENUE Community Development Block Grant Revenue Sharing Funds TOTAL EXPENSES A. Services - Rob Chelseth Work Program Draft. Misc.'Meetings Studies Community Market Study Building/LandUse Study Misc. Printing, etc. TOTAL OF A Other Costs Ind. School Dist. #277 Xerox Laker - Meeting Notices Diane Arneson (Secretary) State of Minnesota McCombs-Knutson' .(Maps) McCombs-Knutson (Maps) McCombs-Knutson (Meetings) TOTAL OF B ' TOTAL OF A & B S 380.00 870.00 1,455.00 1,575.oo 220.00 $4,500.00 45.0o 9..86 21.38 320.00 6O.OO 27.00 !05.O0 52.00 $ 640.24 $5,140.2fl $4,500.00 640.2§ $5,140.24 American Legion Post 398 DATE, .SEPT. 30,, 1982 GAMBLING REPORT CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE ~;ROSS: $42070.00 ~,15. 920.00_ EXPENSES; SALES TAX ~,98.57 PAYOUT AS PRIZES: PROFIT: ~98.57 ~205~.76 1200.00 ,, 9.250. O0 ~77!.~3 ~615.92 DISTRIBUTION OF PROFITS: CO~TJN7 TY FLAGS LEG, BOWLING FEES LEG- 7NSTALTATION EXP. ~112.80 20. O0 75.o0 25. oo CHECKING ACCOUNT ~232.80 t~' 125o. 90 CITY OF MOUND 1982 Summer Recreation Program The City of Mound 1982 Summer Recreation Program was very simila~ to that of 1981. In both years we sponsored a Playground and a Tennis Program. This report will include a summ .a~ of the Playground Program, an attendance report, a budget report and a summary, of the Tennis Program. The Playground Program ~was. set up as follows: - six weeks of activities - four parks (Island, Highland, Three Points and Bellmont) afternoon programming (1:30 to 4:00) The main difference in this set-up over last year's was the use of the Bellmont Tot Lot instead of Tyrone Park. The Tot Lot wo=ked out well. We had 41 children sign up with between 9 and 29 there on a daily basis. Our main problem was the bonfl£ct with afternoon swimming lessons at Centerview Be~ch. We almost used Clover Circle as a fifth park. We held Playground there two years ago until park construction caused an early close. The attendance had been fantastic so I was anxious to use the "new" park. The Brookton Association, h°wever, dedsided against 'allowing us to use the nearby beach. (It is not feasible to have "afternoon programming without nearby beach access.) I talked to Kent Hillsley and he said the Association couldn't allow the children to use the beach with the surrounding area so muddy from the recent storm drain work. As we had expected, a large number of children signed up at each park: - Highland Park 50 - Island Park 65 - Three Points Park 57 - Bellmont Tot Lot 41 totaling 213 sign-ups. On any given day in all four parks we had between 61 and 163 children in the program. This doesn't include the children in the Tennis The activities in the Playground Program again consisted of games, crafts, swimming, special events and field trips. This year 2J~.e..i~J~Ag~lan~?.Park g~oup learned new activities with a supervisor who has majored in drama. The grc~ps went on two field trips together. The first was to the highscho01 for a track and field day. The second was to Independence beach for sw~mm_~S end playground, fun fun. I only scheduled two field trips Because with the higher enrollment I knew the cost of our wages would be greater. going to the playgrounds I went.to the beaches. While there is still x~om for improvement, I found the quality of the work much better over last year. The main problems I noticed were not having the ring buoys and talking to people on the beach (friends?). The guards came up with the following suggestions: - more buoys. One for each guard would soive the problem of trading off. - put ropes on the buoys. - put heavier weights on the water buoy ma~kers at Three Points because the kids can move them'ax~und. - a hammer for the guards at Mound Bay because the pins keep coming out of the docks there. o 1~82 SU'~3VIER ]:~AYGROI~TD ATTE~DANCE 6/28 715 7/.12 ?/17 Island Bellmont 'Three Points ~,~'h].~d Da~¥ '~'~'~; ,'. -- -- -- ~9 .~9 50 26 52 35 163 4~ 27 45 28 14~ 2? -- 72 17 80 457 82 172 .133 544 2? ,17 45 3o 121 34 21 50 ,52 117 2.5 17 ,5,5 18 7 -- 10 -- 17 106 71 155 99 .4~ 18 ~4 ~ 20 ~} 28 2~ 32 ~4 ~5 17 ~5 ~9 86 18 11 26 2~ :?8 2~ 24;' 20 21 88 ~ 07 94 11 ~ 115 ~29 14 25 .. 20 16 27~ ~8 ~0 ~? ~2 27 11 26 ~1 95 20 15 ~6 24 -8~ 67 '112 88 ~55 ~ 1 ~ 52 26 74 21 15 55 1~ 2~ ~2 ~e 27 7 ~ 2~ -- 5~ 20 27 21 ~01 85 ~ ~5~ '9~ 400 15 16 22 21 74 20 2~ 1 6 ~ 4 ~4 ~7 ~ ~7 1 } 10 21 20 64 2o ~ ~ ~o ~4 ~ 75 ~o7 ~02 ~66 625 458 812 650 2525 -- Bad weather, program cancelled * July 5, vacation day ~982 :Budget Report W~ges - Playgrounds . . . . . . . $4407.07 - Tennis .......... ~ 4712.07 Supplies -Playgrounds ....... ~72.69 _ 49.00 421.69 Transportation- Bus Trips.... .... -Car Mileage ....... 129.0~ 84.04 2~:~.o7 Uniforms o . . . · . . · o · . · · · · · · 69.30 Workshop ...... : ........... 90.00 $55~9.76 * Total cost Playground Program .$5185.76 Total cost Tennis Program 354,00 .1,982 ~ TIn, IS Tennis w~s offered once ada/n at Three Points and Island Parks. Scott Ross '.was our teacher. I got his name from Community Services. They have been pleased with his work and I was too - he works well with the children and he is a good teacher. Our schedule was: -' six .weeks: of~.-.tennis-~..s.ta=ting-June.!.i'4th - afternoon classes - twice a week for each park (Island - M & W, Three Points - T & Th) one hour group lessons (We started with three at Three Points and two on Isled) At the end o{ the six weeks, Scott held a skills tournament with trophies and ribbons for prizes. We h~i 17 youth sign up at Island Park, and 55 &t Three Points. Their ages rar~d from 7 to 16 year$. OUr sigh-.up: was.'Up7 this YeAr over ~ast year especially at Three Points, ' The':'&ttendance drop-off was abnormally high, especially on the Islan8 (see attendance below). The only explanation I can come up with for this wa~:"the extremely hpt and humid summernwe h~d. The kids seemed more interested in going to the beach. Program Cost : Wa~es ..... $505.00 ' - Tennis Balls.. 51.50 trophies .... 17 · 50 $~5~.oo Attendance 7' :-'.. -. :- ,: ': Park ~. . Week 1' 2 ~ '" 4 5 , 6 ~o ~ ~o &. _4 6 27 28 20 8 8 12 105 Three 25 19 20 14 18: -- ~oint s 25 -- 18 18 -35 18 50 ~9 38 5-~ ~ ~ Weekly 77 47 58 40 4~ ~0 Total s bad weather, program cancelled NOTE: This attendance was kept separate from the playgrounds and not included in playground attendance. The ~4inneso, to Deportment o! · September 2, 1982 Dear' Interested Party: Currently, I am a member of a working subcommittee of a state man- date task force, established.by Governor A1 Quie in' May'.1982. The committee is charged with the responsibility to review specific general government mandates which impact local governments and have been identified by many'local officials as placing unnecessary re-' quirements or restrictions on local government activities. Because such actions can create fiscal burdens and possible distort local policy priorities, the Governor'would like to see unwarranted or unjustified mandates either eliminated or amended in order to create a more efficient state/local partnership. Attached is a list of 'state mandates which have been identified.in recent years as being most troublesome to .local officials. Because the list is fairly large and the subject area rather broad, the committee would like to limit recommendations to about 5 mandates. In order to narrow the list, I am seeking your assistance to review the list' and identify those five mandates (or less) you feel are most troublesome to your government. Enclosed, you will find a survey form, which you can use to list the mandates which you feel deserve the committee's top priority' in making recommendations to the Governor. It would be most helpful if you would provide us with the following information for each man- date that you identify: 1. The mandate number as shown in the far left corner. Indicate with a check mark whether the mandate should be eliminated or amended. ... 3.. If it 'should be amended, please indicate briefly what changes should:be made. Identify any additional mandates which have not been listed that you feel should be reviewed by the committee. Briefly indicate any suggestions you may have as to a mechanism or process that could best be instituted by the State to reiiew future lesislation {mandates) which impacts local governments. F?7 Office of the Commissioner 101 Capitol Square, 550 Cedar Street, Stl Paul, MN 55101 612-297-2997 I have enclosed, a list of state mandates which are being reviewed by tw.o other working subcommittees of the Mandate Task Force. These additional mandates cover the areas of Human Services and Physical Development. If you have any concerns with respect to these mandates, please contact the respective chairpersons of those committees; and if you have any questions or concerns with respect to the survey, please feel free to contact me or Gordon Folkman at 612/296-0387, Thank you for your assistance, SincerelY, Joe Si zer Chairman Mandate Number M.S. Statute Number GENERAL GOVERNMENT MANDATES TO BE REVIEWED 7 8 9 M~S. t34~34 M.S. 207.31 M.S. 299F.04 M.S. 471.345 M.S. 216B.10 M.S. 624.714 M.S. 15.169 M.S. 15.17 M.S.-117.52 Regional Library System Financial Support Requirements. Establishes financial amounts for cities to support the regional library system. Absentee Balloting Procedures for Hospital Patients and Health Care Facility Residents. Establishes the procedures which city clerks must follow when absentee ballots are requested by hospital patients. Origin and Cause of Fire Report. The chief of the fire department of each city shall investigate the cause, origin, and circumstance of each fire occuring in the city when damages exceed $100. Uniform Municipal Contracting Laws. Sections three through five specify procedures by which cities can seek bids for contractual services. Uniform Utilities Accounting System. The public service commission shall establish a system of accounts to be kept by all public utilities, including municipalities. Licensing of Handgun Carriers° Application for permits to carry "pistols" shall be made to the chief of police of and organized full-time police department where the applicant resides. Data Privacy Law. Regulation of information on individluals kept by state and local governments. All local officials shall make and keep data on individuals limited to that necessary to the administration of programs. Retention of Public Records. All'local governments shall make and keep all records necessary to a full accurate knowledge of their official activities and make such records easily accessible to the public. Uniform Relocation Assistance. Adopts federal guidelines and benefit assistance levels required by any acting authority which undetakes property acquisition and/or rehabilitation for purposes other than highway develOpment or for activities covered by U.S. Dept. of Transportation. te Number 10 11 12 13 1¢ 15 16 M.S. Statute Number M.S. 275.50 M.S. 471.697 M.S. 69.031 M.S. 353.27 M.S. 192.26 M.S. 471.616 M.S. 176.182 Mandate Levy Limit Law. Limits the extent to which cities and counties can increase their property tax levies. Financial Reporting. Requires a financial' report covering city operations to be filed and published annually by cities over 2,500 population. 2% Police Aid. By means of extra employer contributions and payment of the state tax on automobile insurance premiums into the fund, the PERA Police and Fire Fund has been brought to a fully funded status. Despite shortage of law enforcement funds at the local level and despite the fact that current PERA benefits can be supported without the excess 2% police aid funds, most cities and all counties are mandated by M.S. 69.031 (b) to pay over to PERA the amount of the 2% police aid which represents the required contributions together with any excess police aid. Employer Extra Contributions. Cities, counties and towns are mandated to pay more than an amount sufficient to match the employee deductions for both the PERA coordinated fund and the PERA police and fire, even though both are now fully funded. The employer's additional contribution is 1½% for the coordinated plan, M.S. 353.27 and 4% for the police and fire fund, M.S. 353.65. Temppra. rS Military Pay.. When an employee is temporarily absent because of short term military duty, M.S. 192.26' requires the political subdivision to continue full pay even though the employee receives military pay for such activities. Health Benefits Reductions. Political subdivisions are man- dated to maintain the aggregate value of benefits of group health insurance for employees, unless the employees agree to the change. Mandate to Enforce Insurance Requirements. M.S. 176.182 (Laws 1981, Chap. 346) requires cities to enforce the state workers compensation insurance requirement for persons licensed by or contracting with a city. Since many businesses operate with- out licenses from cities and since cities vary as to the types of businesses required to obtain city licenses, any attempt to assure provision of workers compensation coverage through the local licensing process will only partially reach problem businesses. E'oo Mandate Number 17 18 19 M.S. Statute Number M.S. 176.221 M.So 176.11 M.S~ 423A.10 Mandate .~engthen Time Before Claims Must Be Paid. Under 1981 amend- ments to M.S. 176.221, employers and insurers must commence paying workers compensation claims within 14 days. (The previous law allowed 30 days.) This does not leave adequate time for investigation in some cases, resulting in some payments being made which are not justified Presumption for Police and Fire Workers Compensation. M.S. 176.11 (15) creates a presumption that heart attacks, lung conditions, for police and fire personnel are work-related. Thus public employers must provide compensation for those conditions unless they can prove no work connection. Pay While on Relief Association Business. When a police or salaried fire relief association so authorizes any member police officer or firefighter may undertake lobbying activi- ties relating to benefits, without city approval but at city expense. 1974 1978 1973 1977 1976 1978 Ch. 478 M. S, 626,843 Ch. 220 Ch. 37 Ch. 202 M.S. 144.803 M.S. 403.01. M.S. 542.17 M.S. 641.16 M.S. 390.07 M.S. 390.33 M.S. 254A.08 }~nirm~ Recruitm-~t Standards for Peace Officers. No state funds were appropriateR in this act, nor is there a direct way for the cities to recover their costs incurred to c~-~ly ~,~th the law. ~iio~'~ Recruitmamt Standards for Peace officers. b'knim~ Ambulance Standards. There are n=_ither any state fumds available nor is there direct authority for a city to fin=~ce the costs to com~ly. I>resu~mbly, anyrmmicipality 9Perating an ambulance service mast finmnca the ~ncreased costs by raising its fees. Ambulance Equipment and TraLninsRacruitm~t. Increases. No state appropriat~onmmde, ~nd premmmbly the only way to fin~ce the cost is to increase mr~alance rates. Standards for Ambulances. No legislative apPro- priation made, presumably costs to be_ reflected zn zncreased fees. Minim~ Arab. ula~.ce Standards and Training Requiraoants. AdOption of Stateside 5vargancy Telephone. System. Requires c~anties to establish the state~ide emergency 911 telephone system. Payment of Costs of Trial Foll~Lng a Change of %/enue. Foll~eing a change of venue, a county %fnere a trial is held mast pa)' for the costs of the trial. Bibles Rmquired in County Jails. Counties are required to provide Bibles in county jails. Depu.ty Coroners. Prescribes the procedure for appoznting deputy county, coroners~ Appoi~.tment of ~dic~l Examiner Rac~aired. Requires countzes 'to appoint a permanent county mmdica! Detoxification Centers. Requires.county boards to establish detoxification canters. PHYSICAL DE-v'~O.D~ M.~NDAT~S 1973 1978 1978 1978 1973 1977 1978 Ch. 50 M.S. 471,464 M.S. 16.85 M.S. 471.464 M.S. 16.866 M.S. 16.851 Chi'"'694 M.S. 2~A.09, Subd. 3 M.S. 116D.04 ~ M.S. 105.485 Installar_ion of ~heelchair R--~-~s. ~'nile the statute does not provide any state f~mds to finance this, prem~n~hly a city,, may specially assess these costs to abutting property owns_rs to the extent that a benefit is' derived from the {w?rovement. P~mp, .s Required to be Installed at Crosswalks. Raquzres cities to install rm--~ s at crosswalks. P~-mps ~,,~t be installed in accordance with de- sign specifications established by the Depart- ~t of Transportation. Handicapped A~cess to Public Buildings° Required Installation of t;?neelchair R~?s. Surcharge on Building Permits Issued by Cities. Requires cities to add a surcharge to defray the costs of administering the state building code. State Building Code Application. H~-ndicapped ,Access to Polling Place. No state funds were appropriated to fin~ce this, nor is there a direct method for the city to cover the · costs. Polling Places - Accessible to the E!derlv. '- There are no state funds available for ci%ies · to make polling places accessible to the elderly and the handicapped. There is ru3 direct way for the city to finance this besides out of the · Han~capped Access to Polling Places. Envi~ental ~mp, act Statements. Requires cities to pre~are environmental impact state- _re=uts and envz~~l assessment ~x3rksheets. Regulation of Shoreland Development. R~3ui~es cities to adopt shoreland management ord/~ces which mast be approved by the ccmnissioner of the Department of Nat~aral Resources. 1973 1978 '1976 1976 )78 1973 1975 1978 1978 1978 M.S. 162.04 Ch. 351 M.S. 104.O4 Ch. 127 Ch. 333. M.S. l16H. 121 M.S. l16H. 124 Ch. 379 Ch. 175 M.S, 117.232 M.S. 473.06 M.S. 18.023 Paym~_nt Procedures for C~,_nty State-Aid Highways. Establishes pas~-0ant procedures ~ c~.tr~ts in- vol~g ~e c~c~ or i~rov~t of s~t~d hi,mays. }t~-ndatory Flood Plain Zoning. There are no ~tate funds aVailable to fin~ce this act, ~nd the cost incurred by the co,~,,,~ssioner in adopting a flood plain r~nag~t ordinance is to be paid by th=- local gove~:'-~nt unit. M~ndatory Flood Pi~ Zoning. M~mdatory Lm~d Use Planning Law. Soma olarming assistance may be providad by the M~tro~li~ Council. Energy. Sui-vey of Public Buildings. Several appr6- priat_zons were made, but they appemr to be insuf- ficient to handle the total cost, so cities will have to rely on general funds. Energy Conservation Standards in Public Buildings. Makes state enar~cf conservation stan~ds n~--~ndatory for soma buildings. }~ndatory Energy Survey of Govermv~t Buildings. ~ndatory Shoreland Zoning. The city may finance this by a t~_x ~.+~ich may be lew_'ed in ~xcess of any l{r,{tation as to rate or ~nt. Reimburs~t of Appraisal Fees in Er~_nent Dommin Proceedings~ This section provides that a cit5? mast pay up to $300 in appraisal fees in an ~zinent domain proceeding, and there was no legis- lative appropriation to cover this. Owner Reimbarsement for Appraisal Fee in Eminent Domain. ~tetropolitan Council Land Plmnnimg - Local Govern- mmnt ~C0operation. Shade Tree Program. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: INTEROFFICE ~Dund Police Personnel Chief Bruce Wold Speed limit changes on Cry. Rd. 110 MEMO DATE October 19, The attached letter from the Hennepin County."TrarmP°rtation Dept. states that the speed limit on a portion of Cry..Rd. 110, within the City of Mound, will increase from 50 mph to 55 mph. I am concerned with the highway becoming a speedway, endangering the lives of drivers, bicyclists, and Pedestrians. To' offset this hazard, I. am taking an unusual step. I am asking ~each of you to rigidly enforce the speed laws allowing no more than 5 mph tolerance between Grandview Blvd. and-Three Points Blvd. You will probably receive .some heat from motorists you tag because most of them will expect a !0 mph tolerance. You .can.,t~ll. them to talk with the Chief if they feel they are unfairly treated. I plan a newspaper release explaining the enforcement program.: CC: Jon Elam :: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Ay. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 935-3381 October 12, 1982 Mro Jan Elam City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: CSAH 110 from CSAH 15 to CSAH 151 Speed Zoning Dear Mr. Elam: As indicated on the enclosed speed limit authorization the following speed limits on CSAH 110 have been. authorized by the Commissioner of Transportation. ~ 30 MPH between CSAH 15 (North Junction) and Grandview Blvdo 35 MPH between Grandview Blvd. and a point approximately 350 feet north of Three Points Blvd. 45 MPH between a point approximately 350 feet north of Three Po!.nts Blvd. 'and CSAH 151. Our field crews will be posting the new speed limit where applicable within the next ten days. Sincerely, Dennis L. ttansen, P. £. County l'raffi¢ [n§~neer DLH:de Enc. cc: Herb Klossner HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer Mn/DOT 292;13 (]2-78) STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 'LOCAL STREET OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION Page Road Authority Hennepin County R.oad Nameor No. County State Aid Highway 110 IDate September 14, 1982 Termini of Zone: FrctJnounty State Aid fltghwa~. 15 To COunty State Aid liig~r~ay15I )Date of Rj[~west. ly b, 1982 Kindly make the following changes in speed limits on the above-referenced section. Changes authorized herein are in accordance with Minnesota HighwaY Traffic Regulation Act, M.S. Chapter 169.14 and applicable subdivisions thereof. 30 miles per hour between the north intersection with County State Aid l{ighway 15 (Lynwood Boulevard) and the intersection with Gra~dview Boulevard. 35 :tiles per hour between the intersection with Grandvtew l)oulevard and point approximately 350 feet .north ef Three Points ~oulevard. 45 ~.dles per hour between ~.: point approximately 350 feet north of Three Points t~u)evard and the intersect, ion with County State Aid Highway 151' (West Branch Road), (3) White- Road Au. thority (1) Pink-- Central Office Traffic (I) Blue- District Traffic Engineer Please Sign ---~ ..... Here ISignat~e of~ Traffic En~)ineer for Road Authority use only Date traffic control devices changed implementing this authorization Month-Day-Year ISignature I Title LAKE MINNETONKA MAYORS FORUM Minutes of a meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Mayors Forum held at the Deephaven citY Hall on Thursday, October 7, 1982. Members present were Brad Van Nest of Orono, Glen Froberg, Tonka Bay, Dan Lindsey of Minnetonka Beach, Gert Olson of Minnetrista, Richard Knapp of Excelsior and Ed Quest, Deephaven. Also present Mary Butler, Oronoo The Mayors were informed that the ten communities required for a Cable TV Agreement will have been secured once Greenwood signs its contract. Accordingly the joint .powers committee will soon be functioning and will take over from the original task force. The Mayors wished to go on record as a group as favoring the three modifi- cations offered by Shorewood and wish to encourage the joint powers commission to incorporate those amendments into their agreement. Brad Van Nest repot ~d on the Department of Natural Resources Task Force investigating lake accesses for off lake residents and indicated that the main thrust of the DNR seems to be that of facilitating greater availability for fishing boats° The work of this Task Force continues and will be reported back at future meetings° A move to convert the Big Island Veteran's Camp to a County Park was reR~rted by Brad Van Nest and as background he offered to send to all of the Mayors a resume of the past history of Big Island. The group generally Was supportive of a park status for the island if such appears to be imminent. tMinnetonka Beach reported that they have just secured approval, to use HUD funds to remove diseased elms in-their community, both for public and private property. It was suggested that any interested communities contact Larry Blackstad in this regard. On the general subject of waste Risposal, Gen Olson reported that their rates are based on volume useage. They not only provided for double can rates; single can rates; but also shared cans by two close neighbors. The possibility of re-cycling was looked upon most favorable by all Mayors present and any plans or proposals that seem feasible to any individual city should be reported back to the group. At our last meeting, on the general subject of watershed control, it was suggested that the lake communities support a member for appointment to the watershed board. Brad Van Nest and Dan Lindsey volunteered as a seiection committee with the assign- ment of finding a candidate that could be recommended through the Mayors Forum to all lake communities for their collective support. This will be followed up at the December meeting of the group scheduled to meet on Thursday, December 16, 1982. It was also suggested that Bill Humphrey report on the shooting episode that occured in Wayzata in so far as he might recommend from this experience certain precautions or procedural suggestions for other communities that might be confronted with a similar occurance. -farm as"chem aump;; -- mmove,;the mw~s: ' i"at ::.gallon :st~el- bar~l~ wer~ then' ~r .Wo~ke .e6~ld;~nof :be; .r~a~aed .. · t~t-t~ was-t.~S "pose" of them.':. Tl~e ~gencY"--saldj.:"vestl~tlon'o! ': Wb. ke 'appar~ntly:-tnt~nded to r~e.use ' .farm. The ~ .. ."been filed~agaitlst Woyk~ : apparently were~gene~ .':.'the.'M, PCA' said b'e ~.:an~l other limdustries.? " " were transported wi~- "..tests!are under to .out proper ship~ihg .l)aPers," said '..the ..... Paul T4olt, au lvIPCA spokesma{).'.i' ~p.rbPer!~."~:' -v,'-.~. . "The wastes wereu't 'proPerly la;. "--:_ ..'. ..... - ..... .:: . beled and they were dumped at an The lVlPCA.!spokesmnn unapproved d,~posal site.. =. ~ ;.' . barrels and the -wastes under-~ b--o