The URL can be used to link to this page

2021-03-23 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, L quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 1. Opening meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance AGENDA TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2021 - 7:00 PM LOCATION: WESTONKA SCHOOLS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff, recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence. Separate introduction or further support from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for this purpose is not required or appropriate. 4. *Consent Agenda Page *A. Approve payment of claims 572-624 *B. Approve minutes: March 9, 2021 Regular Meeting 625-632 *C. Approve Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Mound City Code as it 633-634 Relates to Administration *D. Approve Resolution authorizing transfer of funds 635-636 636 *E. Approval of Resolution amending Resolution No. 20-108 authorizing the 637-638 granting of regulatory flexibility to local businesses 638 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Sergeant Tim Sonnek with the Orono Police Department February Mound Activity 639-641 Report Planning Commission Recommendation A. Public Hearings - Major -subdivision -preliminary plat of "Villages of Island Park", 642-724 rezoning and Conditional Use Permit for townhomes and for a planned development area in the shoreland overlay district for property at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard Applicants: Steve Schwanke of Inland Development Partners, LLC and Turnquist Properties PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Requested Actions: i. Approval of Resolution approving the Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat 644-646 of Villages of Island Park Planning Case No. 21-01 ii. Approval of Resolution approving Ordinance amending the Mound Official 647-648 Zoning Map to rezone PID Number 19-117-23-31-0021 and PID Number 19-117-23-31-0020 from B-2 General Business District to R-3 Multiple -Family Residential Planning Case No. 21-01 iii. Approval of Resolution granting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for 649-552 Townhouse Use and a Shoreland Planned Unit Development Area (PDA) for Villages of Island Park Planning Case No. 21-01 8. Review/discussion regarding request for evaluation of tattoo studio as substantially 725-750 similar use at 5439 Shoreline Drive in Lost Lake commercial building as provided by 729 City Code Sec. 129-71 (continued from March 9, 2021 City Council Meeting) Applicant: Dane Vocelka Owner: Samuel C. & Shea F. Steadman Requested Action: i. Approval of Resolution regarding substantial use determination for property at 5439 Shoreline Drive in Lost Lake commercial building 9. Building Official Recommendation: A. Consideration/action on Resolution regarding hazardous building at 3053 751-766 Brighton Boulevard 753 B. Consideration/action on Resolution regarding restoration agreement at 767-784 2396 Commerce Blvd 768 10. Mayor Salazar providing an update to Council and Community on Lost Lake 785-789 Improvement Initiative preliminary coordination activities a. Action to approve release of Lost Lake Improvement Initiative Introductory memo to MN Department of Natural Resources 11. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/Reports from Council members: B. Reports: Fire Department— February 2021 790-791 C. Minutes: 2-11-21 Parks and Open Spaces Commission 792-794 D. Correspondence: 12. Adjourn COUNCIL BRIEFING March 23, 2021 In tune with Phase III of the Stay Safe MN Plan; through mid -November, we will re -open Council and Commission meetings to in -person attendance for our residents. Meetings will be hosted in the Westonka Schools Performing Arts Center where social distancing requirements can be more easily met; or Council Chambers in the Centennial Building as noted below. Council meetings will continue to be held the second and fourth Tuesday each month at 7:00 PM with agendas and meeting details/locations posted to the City website the Thursday prior under the "Mayor and Council' section of the "Government" tab of the Home Page. Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! March 23 - 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) March 23 - 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting * * * at Westonka Performing Arts Center*** April 13 - 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) April 13 - 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting * * * At City Council Chambers, Centennial Building April 20 - 6:30 PM — City Council Special Meeting, Annual Reports Workshop * * * At City Council Chambers, Centennial Building * * * April 27 - 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) April 27 - 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting * * * at Westonka Performing Arts Center*** May Meetings, locations TBD May 11, 2021 — HRA and Council May 25, 2021 — HRA and Council City Offices: Until Further Notice; by Day -to -Day Essential Business by Appointment Only City Official's Absences Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Inauire in advance. please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision - making. 2021 City of Mound Claims 03-23-21 YEAR BATCH NAME 2020 2020AP-18 2020 2020AP-19 2021 JAN21KENGRAV 2021 022321CTYMAN 2021 030911HWS 2021 030921PAYREQ 2021 031221CTYMAN 2021 031621CTYMAN 2021 0221 U N I F I RST DOLLAR AMOUNT $ 40.00 $ 1,005.00 $ 7,755.50 $ 18,755.81 $ 128,512.64 $ 224,667.95 $ 213,319.45 $ 1,341.11 $ 1,760.52 cont. on next page 2021 City of Mound Claims 03-23-21 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2021 FEB21HOISINGT $ 6,753.65 2021 032321CITY $ 90,479.45 2021 032321HWS $ 95,368.15 TOTAL CLAIMS 11 $ 789,759.23 Payments Batch 2020AP-18 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: Closing 2020 $40.00 Refer 20 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 379656 12/302020 Transaction Date 2232021 Due 12/312020 Accounts Payable 20200 Fund Summary 20200 Accounts Payable 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $40.00 $40.00 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $40.00 Total $40.00 02/23/21 3:13 PM Page 1 $40.00 Total $40.00 CITY OF MOUND 03/12/21 3:08 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: Closing 2020 Payments Batch 2020AP-19 $1,005.00 Refer 316 BENIEK PROPERTY SVCS INC. _ AP Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic AREA#1 CBD NOVEMBER 2020 PLOWING $415.00 Invoice 155314 12/12020 AP Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic AREA#2 TRUE VALUE -RAMP -SIDEWALKS $590.00 NOVEMBER 2020 PLOWING & SHOVELING Invoice 155314 12/12020 Transaction Date 3/122021 Due 12/312020 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,005.00 Fund Summary 20200 Accounts Payable 101 GENERAL FUND $1,005.00 $1,005.00 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $1,005.00 Total $1,005.00 �f�m CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Payments Batch JAN21 KENGRAV $7,755.50 Refer 342 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN _ Cash Payment G 101-234501720 RESTHAVEN ABATEM 1720 RESTHAVEN LN HAZARDOUS BLDG ABATEMENT MATTER -LEGAL SVCS JAN 2021 Invoice 159501 2222021 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SVCS JANUARY 2021 Invoice 159501 2222021 Cash Payment G 101-23440 4848/4852 LANARK ABATE 4848/4852 LANARK RD ENFORCEMENT MATTER -LEGAL SVCS JAN 2021 Invoice 159501 2222021 Cash Payment G 101-23454 2396 COMMERCE BLVD HA 2396 COMMERCE BLVD HAZARDOUS BLDG MATTER -LEGAL SVCS JAN 2021 Invoice 159501 2222021 Cash Payment G 101-23453 5872 GLENWOOD ABATE 5872 GLENWOOD RD HAZARDOUS BLDG ABATEMENT -LEGAL SVCS JAN 2021 Invoice 159501 2222021 Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs MOUND HARBOR PLAT RESUBMITTAL TO HENNEP CTY LEGAL SVCS JAN 2021 Invoice 159501 2222021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Due 12/312017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $7,708.00 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $47.50 $7,755.50 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $7,755.50 Total $7,755.50 03/16/21 3:12 PM Page 1 $4,279.50 $336.00 $197.00 $1,850.00 $1,045.50 $47.50 $7,755.50 Mk-ei Payments Batch 022321CTYMAN CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2021 $18,755.81 Refer 100 ORONO, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners Invoice 20141743 2/182021 Transaction Date 2202019 HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM FEES JANUARY 2021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 103 SUBURBAN MOLD & MACHINE INC _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs MODIFY SNOW PLOW BLADES Invoice 22492 2/112021 Transaction Date 2232021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 104 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Total Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2021 MEMBERSHIP ASSESSMENT $461NOTE- CITY OF MOUND- 2 VOTES Invoice 022321 2/102021 Transaction Date 2232021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 106 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 1-14-21 THRU 2-13- 21 Invoice 9873330563 2/132021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 1-14-21 THRU 2-13- 21 Invoice 9873330563 2/132021 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 1-14-21 THRU 2-13- 21 Invoice 9873330563 2/132021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 1-14-21 THRU 2-13- 21 Invoice 9873330563 2/132021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 1-14-21 THRU 2-13- 21 Invoice 9873330563 2/132021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 1-14-21 THRU 2-13- 21 Invoice 9873330563 2/132021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 1-14-21 THRU 2-13- 21 Invoice 9873330563 2/132021 Transaction Date 2232021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 02/23/21 4:39 PM Page 1 $232.74 $232.74 $700.00 $700.00 $922.00 $922.00 $16.42 $98.52 $56.84 $16.42 $131.36 $115.31 $69.99 $504.86 Refer 105 VERIZON WIRELESS _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT SPOT- $35.01 SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $35.01 SPOT 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- $35.01 INTERNET SVC- 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 <d912s> CITY OF MOUND 02/23/21 4:39 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: February 2021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- R. PRICH -TABLET- $59.84 INTERNET SVC- 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Project 20-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- R. PRICH -TABLET- $35.01 HOT SPOT SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Project 20-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $17.50 SPOT- SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $17.51 SPOT- SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $35.01 SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NEW STREETS TABLET DATACARD $35.01 INTERNET SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY 7726- NEW TABLET- INTERNET SVC $17.50 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY 7726- NEW TABLET- INTERNET SVC $17.50 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi SEWER TRUCK#109 DATACARD SVC 1-11- $35.01 21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC $59.84 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Project 20-3 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 1-11-21 $17.51 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 1-11-21 $35.01 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #315 DATACARD SVC 1-11- $35.01 21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #512 R. PRICH DATACARD $35.01 SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.51 SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET -$22.57 SVC 1-11-21 THRU 2-10-21 Invoice 9873068544 2/102021 Transaction Date 2232021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $552.24 Refer 101 WILD MIND ARTISAN ALES _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $252.00 Invoice 1421 2/152021 Transaction Date 2232021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $252.00 PY17.1 Refer CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: February 2021 102 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2604 2/172021 Transaction Date 2232021 Wells Fargo Refer 597 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 101-41930-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 285-46388-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 718470120 2/22021 Transaction Date 2/172021 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 285 HRA/HARBOR DISTRICT 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Total 02/23/21 4:39 PM Page 3 $185.10 $185.10 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21- $114.73 DEPOT BLDG ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $203.92 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $3,318.73 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $1,178.54 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $3,447.81 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $1,139.93 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $1,690.68 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $1,690.68 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $642.53 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $1,934.91 ELECTRIC SVC - 12-27-20 TO 1-26-21 $44.41 Wells Fargo 10100 Wells Fargo $6,276.68 $1,690.68 $1,934.91 $3,645.58 $3,630.93 $1,577.03 $18,755.81 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $18,755.81 Total $18,755.81 10100 Total $15,406.87 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 1 Payments Batch 030911 HWS $128,512.64 Refer 200 56 BREWING, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale $72.00 Invoice 5613410 3/12021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 201 AM CRAFT SPIRITS, INC. Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $132.85 Invoice 12020 3/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $3.00 Invoice 12020 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $135.85 Refer 202 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $614.80 Invoice 3460070 2/192021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $430.45 Invoice 3461183 2262021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $873.60 Invoice 3462250 3/52021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,918.85 Refer 203 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $119.95 Invoice 0102848100 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $78.00 Invoice 0102812900 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- PARASOL PICK, CARDED AUGERS $7.70 Invoice 0102847900 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $62.00 Invoice 0102847800 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $267.65 Refer 204 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $264.00 Invoice 0088161400 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,343.52 Invoice 0088085500 2/192021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $10.78 Invoice 0088085500 2/192021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,141.85 Invoice 0088161400 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $263.00 Invoice 0088161400 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $26.63 Invoice 0088161400 2242021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,049.78 Refer 206 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $50.00 Invoice 0088273300 3/32021 ,RI CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 2 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $1.55 Invoice 0088273300 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,387.95 Invoice 0088272300 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $26.35 Invoice 0088272300 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,465.85 Refer 207 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $50.00 Invoice 0088209200 2262021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8.55 Invoice 0088209100 2262021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $435.55 Invoice 0088209100 2262021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.05 Invoice 0088209200 2262021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$25.00 Invoice 0088173000 2232021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $471.15 Refer 208 BIG AXE BREWING CO. LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $339.58 Invoice 2389 3/22021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $339.58 Refer 209 BRASS FOUNDRY BREWING CO. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $217.50 Invoice 5972 2232021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $128.00 Invoice 6011 3/22021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $345.50 Refer 210 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $98.40 Invoice 1091211617 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,664.60 Invoice 1091211616 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,197.26 Invoice 338591609 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,960.26 Refer 211 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $504.00 Invoice 1081243645 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $809.85 Invoice 1081243644 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,604.95 Invoice 1081243593 2242021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,918.80 Refer 212 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ [ N S7 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1081242921 2232021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1081242920 2232021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1081241096 2/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 338591113 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1081241097 2/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 338591113 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 213 BROKEN CLOCK BREWING COOP _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 4777 2/172021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 214 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT Invoice 2516508 2232021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2519235 3/22021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2516507 2232021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2516509 2232021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT Invoice 2519234 3/22021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2517178 2242021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 216 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO. Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 570536 3/12021 Transaction Date 3/102021 BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 217 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX Invoice 3609212885 3/82021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 222 COPPER TRAIL BREWING, CO. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 22276 2/192021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 218 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1361113 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Total 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 3 $2,448.00 $211.71 $537.12 $1,700.09 $37.38 $1,816.00 $6,750.30 $144.00 $144.00 -$343.50 $7,612.80 $58.50 $4,453.00 -$218.80 $89.00 $11,651.00 $635.67 $635.67 $469.96 $469.96 $133.54 $133.54 $2,856.35 $2,856.35 09. CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 4 Refer 219 HEADFL YER BREWING _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $376.00 Invoice 2654 2232021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $376.00 Refer 220 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,021.20 Invoice 391656 3/22021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $361.50 Invoice 390085 2232021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $22.50 Invoice 392692 3/52021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,405.20 Refer 221 INBOUND BREWCO _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $276.00 Invoice 9635 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$155.83 Invoice 508 2/192021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.17 Refer 223 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,997.00 Invoice 3156796 3/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $55.40 Invoice 3156797 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,052.40 Refer 224 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,242.80 Invoice 3156765 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $652.35 Invoice 3130042 2252021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,895.15 Refer 227 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $185.00 Invoice 1752611 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $674.75 Invoice 1752607 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $7,343.99 Invoice 1752606 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,368.93 Invoice 1752610 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,400.00 Invoice 1752609 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $180.00 Invoice 10797 2/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,764.40 Invoice 1752608 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,917.07 Refer 226 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ <d�2a> CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1750171 3/12021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1752605 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo Refer 225 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1747704 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1747702 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1747703 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1750096 3/12021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1750097 3/12021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 136258 2/122021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo Refer 230 LIBATION PROJECT Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 33807 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 33807 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 33807 2242021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Refer 232 LIBATION PROJECT Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 32754 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 32754 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 32754 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Refer 228 LUPINE BREWING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 003601 2262021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Refer 229 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 35408 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice CN7838 2/112021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Refer 231 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY LIQUOR WINE FREIGHT Wells Fargo LIQUOR WINE FREIGHT Wells Fargo 10100 10100 10100 10100 Total Total Total Total BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Total BEER BEER CREDIT Wells Fargo 10100 Total 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 5 $1,079.00 $7,832.00 $8, 911.00 $28.00 $4,545.63 $1,258.19 $2,182.50 $1,542.96 -$242.40 $9,314.88 $634.00 $376.00 $9.00 $1,019.00 $316.00 $384.00 $6.00 $706.00 $86.80 $86.80 $268.35 -$32.64 $235.71 ,R Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 37062 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 37047 2/182021 Transaction Date 3/102021 CITY OF MOUND 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: March 2021 DELIVERY SVC 2-25-21 $327.70 DELIVERY SVC 2-18-21 $314.65 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 233 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 1-25-21 Invoice 180122662 1292017 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $65.19 $642.35 $65.19 Refer 234 MINT ROOFING, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC CALL TO LOCATE & REPAIR ROOF $880.48 LEAK NEAR BEER COOLER @ HWS- 2-23-21 Invoice 1368856 2282021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC CALL TO LOCATE & REPAIR ROOF $559.77 LEAK NEAR BEER COOLER @ HWS- 2-2-21 Invoice 1346066 2/142021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,440.25 Refer 235 MOUND, CITY OF _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities WATER SERVICE 1-4-21 THRU 2-1-21 HWS $71.72 Invoice 030921 2202021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $71.72 Refer 236 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $310.50 Invoice 118004 2222021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.25 Invoice 118004 2222021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $303.00 Invoice 118856 3/12021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.25 Invoice 118856 3/12021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.75 Invoice 119387 3/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $574.50 Invoice 119430 3/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$119.00 Invoice 119387 3/52021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,077.75 Refer 238 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,125.21 Invoice 6167818 3/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $554.62 Invoice 6167819 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,679.83 Refer 237 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $638.25 Invoice 6164440 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $617.23 Invoice 6164439 2242021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 7 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,255.48 Refer 239 SCHRAM WINERY & BREWERY LL _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $270.00 Invoice 000675 2/192021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $144.00 Invoice 000280 2262021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $414.00 Refer 240 SHAKOPEE BREWHALL _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $162.00 Invoice 2452 2252021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $162.00 Refer 241 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $189.66 Invoice 2599134 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $189.66 Refer 242 SOCIABLE CIDERWERKS _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $120.00 Invoice 1851 2242021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.00 Refer 243 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,216.00 Invoice 2051092 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,925.60 Invoice 2051093 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $12,591.00 Invoice 2051091 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,370.96 Invoice 2053694 3/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,274.79 Invoice 2053695 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19,378.35 Refer 244 SP3, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $388.00 Invoice 92581 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $286.00 Invoice 93625 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $504.00 Invoice 93977 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,178.00 Refer 245 ST. CLOUD REFRIGERATION, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maintenance REPAIR- COOLERS, CONDENSERS HWS- $482.61 WIRE FOR CPACITOR BROKE OFF OF TERMINAL- REPAIRED WIRING 2-18-21 Invoice W63370 2242021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $482.61 Refer 246 STARRY EYED BREWING CO. LLC _ Li i CITY OF MOUND 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 8 Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $152.00 Invoice 4315 3/52021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $152.00 Refer 247 SUMMER LAKES BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $180.00 Invoice 1842 2/182021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.00 Refer 248 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $160.00 Invoice 25302 2/192021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $64.00 Invoice 25303 2/192021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $3.00 Invoice 25303 2/192021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $3.00 Invoice 25302 2/192021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.00 Refer 249 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $131.33 Invoice 25345 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,376.00 Invoice 25345 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $31.75 Invoice 25345 2252021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,539.08 Refer 250 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $717.09 Invoice 0273756 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $12.00 Invoice 0273756 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $104.00 Invoice 0273757 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $12.00 Invoice 0273755 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $120.00 Invoice 0273755 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.00 Invoice 0273757 2/182021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $967.09 Refer 251 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $48.88 Invoice 0274149 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0274149 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $88.00 Invoice 0274150 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0274150 2252021 [ N Transaction Date 3/102021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 252 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0273949 2232021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0274697 3/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0274697 3/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0273949 2232021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 9 Total $141.88 $428.13 $14.00 $600.00 $5.00 Total $1,047.13 Refer 253 VITAL SIGNS _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising HELP WANTED SIGNS- 4' X 4' BANNER $155.00 W/GROMMETS- 2' X2' BANNER- HWS Invoice 21114 2242021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $155.00 Refer 254 WILD MIND ARTISAN ALES _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1428 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 256 WINE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 164399 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 164399 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 165566 3/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 165566 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 255 WINE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 164990 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 164990 2252021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 164991 2252021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 257 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 7320086 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 258 WINEBOW _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0090381 2/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0090381 2/182021 $384.00 $384.00 $382.00 $6.30 $332.00 $6.30 $726.60 $72.00 $4.20 $576.00 $652.20 $2,636.00 Total $2,636.00 $592.00 $10.50 Transaction Date 3/102021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 259 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 2622 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $128,512.64 $128,512.64 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $128,512.64 Total $128,512.64 03/11/21 4:01 PM Page 10 $602.50 $316.50 $316.50 Payments Batch 030921 PAYREQ CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 $224,667.95 Refer 261 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR Cash Payment G 401-20800 Due to Other Governments Invoice 0001120445 3/92021 Cash Payment G 601-21500 Accrued Interest Payable 2018 STREET PROJ --WESTEDGE BLVD- PW 18-01 FINAL PAY REQ- MCES-- COOPERATIVE PROJECT PROCESS- IN WARRANTY PERIOD -ORIGINAL PROJ. COMPLETED NOV 2020 Project PW1801 2018 STREET PROJ --WESTEDGE BLVD- PW 18-01 FINAL PAY REQ- MCES-- COOPERATIVE PROJECT PROCESS- IN WARRANTY PERIOD -ORIGINAL PROJ. COMPLETED NOV 2020 03/12/21 1:54 PM Page 1 $93,103.85 $45,183.95 Invoice 0001120445 3/92021 Project PW1801 Cash Payment G 602-20800 Due to Other Governments 2018 STREET PROJ --WESTEDGE BLVD- PW $55,898.53 18-01 FINAL PAY REQ- MCES-- COOPERATIVE PROJECT PROCESS- IN WARRANTY PERIOD -ORIGINAL PROJ. COMPLETED NOV 2020 Invoice 0001120445 3/92021 Project PW1801 Cash Payment G 675-20800 Due to Other Governments 2018 STREET PROJ --WESTEDGE BLVD- PW $13,165.70 18-01 FINAL PAY REQ- MCES-- COOPERATIVE PROJECT PROCESS- IN WARRANTY PERIOD -ORIGINAL PROJ. COMPLETED NOV 2020 Invoice 0001120445 3/92021 Project PW1801 Transaction Date 3/102021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $207,352.03 Refer 260 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Cash Payment G 602-20200 Accounts Payable Invoice 030921 3/22021 Cash Payment G 602-20200 Accounts Payable Invoice 030921 3/22021 Transaction Date 3/102021 PAY REQUEST #3 & FINAL 2019 FERNSIDE $2,404.00 FORCEMAIN IMPROV PROJ PW 19-05-- WORK COMPLETED AUG 5TH 2O20 THRU MARCH 2ND 2021 Project PW1905 PAY REQUEST #3 & FINAL 2019 BAYRIDGE $14,911.92 SEWER SERVICE IMPROV PROJ PW 19-11-- WORK COMPLETED AUG 5TH 2O20 THRU MARCH 2ND 2021 Project PW1911 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $17,315.92 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $93,103.85 601 WATER FUND $45,183.95 602 SEWER FUND $73,214.45 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $13,165.70 $224,667.95 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $224,667.95 Total $224,667.95 0, 1 CITY OF MOUND 03/12/2110:03AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: March 2021 Payments Batch 031221CTYMAN $213,319.45 Refer 300ALLDATA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-205 Computer Hardware/Soft DATA SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $375.00 SYSTEM 3-31-21 THRU 3-31-22 Invoice 00473798 3/42021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-205 Computer Hardware/Soft DATA SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $375.00 SYSTEM 3-31-21 THRU 3-31-22 Invoice 00473798 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-205 Computer Hardware/Soft DATA SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $375.00 SYSTEM 3-31-21 THRU 3-31-22 Invoice 00473798 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-205 Computer Hardware/Soft DATA SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $375.00 SYSTEM 3-31-21 THRU 3-31-22 Invoice 00473798 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/92021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,500.00 Refer 301 AMERICAN MESSAGING _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi MONTHLY PAGING MESSAGING SVC -APRIL $1.88 2020- PARKS & PUB WKS Invoice D2062026VC 3/12021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi MONTHLY PAGING MESSAGING SVC-APRIL $1.87 2020- PARKS & PUB WKS Invoice D2062026VC 3/12021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi MONTHLY PAGING MESSAGING SVC -APRIL $1.88 2020- PARKS & PUB WKS Invoice D2062026VC 3/12021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi MONTHLY PAGING MESSAGING SVC -APRIL $1.87 2020- PARKS & PUB WKS Invoice D2062026VC 3/12021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7.50 Refer 302 BENIEK PROPERTY SVCS INC. _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #1 CBD FEBRUARY 2021 PLOWING $600.00 Invoice 155756 3/12021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #2 TRUE VALUE -RAMP -SIDEWALKS $930.00 FEB 2021 PLOWING&SHOVELING Invoice 155756 3/12021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #3 COMMERCE BLVD FEBRUARY $3,650.00 2021 PLOWING Invoice 155756 3/12021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,180.00 Refer 304 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous RENTAL & MTCE 3-1-21 thru 5-31-21- $83.46 COFFEE MACHINE FIRE DEPT Invoice 817566 3/12021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $83.46 Refer 305 BOYER TRUCKS-MPLS Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs PADDED SEAT- WATER VEHICLE #316 $70.54 Invoice 101062L 222021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SEAT COVER- WATER VEHICLE #316 $200.88 Invoice 941986 2/172021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs RETURN CREDIT Invoice CM97956L 222021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training SENSOR, RETAINER, STREETS #119 Invoice 91451 R 2/172021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 306 CADY BUILDING MAINTENANCE Cash Payment E 101-41930-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 4979574 3/12021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 4979574 3/12021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 4979574 3/12021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 4979574 3/12021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 4979574 3/12021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 4979574 3/12021 Cash Payment E 101-41930-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 4979574 3/12021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 4979574 3/12021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Refer 307 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 0311121 3/112021 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 2 -$108.00 $58.89 $222.31 MARCH 2O21 CLEANING SVCS- CITY HALL $550.00 /POLICE MARCH 2O21 CLEANING SVCS- FIRE DEPT $299.00 MARCH 2O21 CLEANING SVCS- PUBLIC $425.00 WORKS BLDG Project 21-4 MARCH 2O21 CLEANING SVCS- CENTENNIAL $425.00 BLDG CLEANING SUPPLIES- MULTI -FOLD TOWELS $25.23 CLEANING SUPPLIES- MULTI -FOLD TOWELS $25.23 Project 21-4 CLEANING SUPPLIES- MULTI -FOLD TOWELS $32.78 CLEANING SUPPLIES- MULTI -FOLD TOWELS $17.66 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,799.90 4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL $39.40 GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 1717 BAYWOOD SHORES DR. LS $36.42 GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 4728 CARLOW RD LS GENERATOR NATL $26.43 GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 1871 COMMERCE BLVD NEW LIFT STATION $27.76 GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR $32.33 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 5808 GRANDVIEW BLVD LS GENERATOR $32.62 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR $33.35 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 �17 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 5260 LYNWOOD BLVD. LS GENERATOR $25.11 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 4791 NORTHERN RD LS D1 GENERATOR $33.85 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 1972 SHOREWOOD LN LS GENERATOR $27.08 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 3172 SINCLAIR RD LS GENERATOR NATL $36.92 GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 1758 SUMACH LANE LS GENERATOR NATL $27.14 GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 4922 THREE PTS BLVD LS GENERATOR $32.43 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 1-20-21 $26.46 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 5077 WINDSOR RD LS GENERATOR NATL $27.81 GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 4783 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE LS GENERATOR $25.62 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 5330 BARTLETT & LAKEWOOD- LS E4 $39.63 GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 3000 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE LS GENERATOR $28.93 NATL GAS SVC 1-20-21 THRU 2-20-21 Invoice 0311121 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $559.29 Refer 308 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 1 OXYGEN & 1 ACETYLENE CYLINDERS - $111.35 PUB WKS Invoice 00432820 2222021 Project 21-3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies HIGH PRESSURE ACETYLENE MEDIUM $3.08 CYLINDER RENTALS- QTY 5 Invoice 00114201 2282021 Project 21-3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 1 CYLINDER ARGON - PUB WKS $97.75 Invoice 00431516 2/162021 Project 21-3 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $212.18 Refer 309 CORE & MAIN LP Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice N751309 2/182021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice N748999 2/172021 WATER METER PARTS- IMPELLARS $307.16 8 QTY IPERL WATER METER $1,138.72 �17 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER LINE EMERGENCY REPAIR - GASKETS, IMPELLARS, ZINC HEAD NUTS & BOLTS, Invoice N742207 2/162021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 310 DPC INDUSTRIES, INC. _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals 150# CHLORINE CYLINDER RENTAL- QTY 14 Invoice 82000019-21 2282021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 311 FASTENAL COMPANY Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice MNWAC68584 2/82021 Transaction Date 3/112021 REPAIR PARTS- PUBLIC WORKS Project 21-4 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 312 FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC, HENNEPIN C _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training GORDON GRAHAM VIRTUAL TRAINING - MOUND FIRE DEPT FEB 22 & 27 2021 Invoice 21-019 2/192021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 313 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES, 1 _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies 6 PAIR- 14" KEVLAR FIRE BOOTS- FIREMEN Invoice 10740 2/182021 PO 25237 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 314 FIRS TNET _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC- XXX-0353 FIRE UNIT #39 FIRE CHIEF RESCUE UTILITY 1-26-21 THRU 2-25-21 Invoice 287290913950X2 1252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC XXX-0545 FIRE #43 RESCUE TRUCK SVC 1-26-21 THRU 2-25-21 Invoice 287290913950X2 1252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC XXX-1887 FIRE LADDER TRUCK#44 SVC 1-26-21 THRU 2-25-21 Invoice 287290913950X2 1252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC XXX-1962 FIRE ENGINE #29 SVC 1-26-21 THRU 2-25-21 Invoice 287290913950X2 1252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC XXX-4845 FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY OFFICER SVC 1-26-21 THRU 2-25-21 Invoice 287290913950X2 1252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELLPHONE SVC XXX-0150- CHIEF G. PEDERSON - 1-26-21 THRU 2-25-21 Invoice 287290913950X2 1252021 Transaction Date 2/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 315 FIVE TECHNOLOGY _ Cash Payment E 101-41920-440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY MANAGED SVC & NETWORK MTCE- MARCH 2O21 Invoice 10321-15 3/12021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 316 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Total 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 4 $507.58 $1,953.46 $140.00 $140.00 $31.28 $31.28 $100.00 $100.00 $1,019.95 $1,019.95 $38.23 $38.23 $38.23 $38.23 $38.23 $53.89 $245.04 $1,290.00 $1,290.00 2+L CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Cash Payment E 101-41930-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-3-01-21- TO 3-29-21 Invoice 031121 2282021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 5 $50.98 $230.26 $210.51 $204.32 $204.32 $483.31 $161.10 $80.55 $80.55 Total $1,705.90 Refer 317 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NETWORK ETHERNET SVC 2-22-21 THRU 3- $150.00 21-21 Invoice 031121-2 2222021 Cash Payment E 101-41920-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NETWORK ETHERNET SVC 2-22-21 THRU 3- $175.00 21-21 Invoice 031121-2 2222021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $325.00 Refer 318 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One -Call FEBRUARY 2021 LOCATES $24.30 Invoice 1020612 2282021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One -Call FEBRUARY 2021 LOCATES $24.30 Invoice 1020612 2282021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $48.60 Refer 319 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals 150 LB CHLORINE CYLINDERS- QTY 5 $511.48 Invoice 4887658 2252021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $511.48 Refer 320 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE- $327.92 FEBRUARY 2021 Invoice 1000162694 3/32021 Project 20-3 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $2,268.95 ADMINISTRATION FEE- FEBRUARY 2021 Invoice 1000162637 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,596.87 Refer 321 KIRVIDA FIRE- APPARATUS SVC N CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPLACE 1 1/2" AKRON BALL VALVE & 4 TANK VALVES- 2007 FREIGHTLINER FIRE TANKER TRUCK#35 Invoice 9416 2232021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 322 KOSKELA, DUSTIN _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2021 BOOT ALLOWANCE REIMB- D. KOSKELA Invoice 031121 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 323 LAND EQUIPMENT, INCORPORAT _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs STIHL CHAINSAW, CHARGER, BATTERY CHAIN LOOP- PARKS Invoice 03-815795 322021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs RETURN ELECTRIC TOP HANDLE, 2019 STIHL, BATTERY & QUICK CHARGER - PARKS Invoice 03-816213 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 03-815795 322021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 03-815027 2262021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 03-815993 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/112021 SPA HARNESS -PARKS MUFFLER, NUT -PARKS ADAPTERS, MALE & FEMALE COUPLING - STREETS DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 Total 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 6 $746.77 $746.77 $200.00 $200.00 $784.25 -$770.96 $209.59 $91.12 $94.01 $408.01 Refer 324 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _ Cash Payment E 101-41110-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- $3,938.08 21 THRU 2-1-22 Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-41310-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- $252.44 21 THRU 2-1-22 Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-41500-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- $1,060.25 21 THRU 2-1-22 Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-41600-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- $100.98 21 THRU 2-1-22 Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- $2,070.03 21 THRU 2-1-22 Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-42110-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- $1,615.62 21 THRU 2-1-22 Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- $294.11 21 THRU 2-1-22 Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- $1,312.69 21 THRU 2-1-22 Invoice 031121 3/42021 'RLO CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 281-45210-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 285-46388-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-41930-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 031121 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/112021 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 GEN LIAB 1ST HALF 2021 GEN LIAB INS 2-1- 21 THRU 2-1-22 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 7 $3,685.64 $2,524.41 $5,882.13 $989.68 $3,534.18 $4,068.47 $9,313.37 $9,313.37 $1,918.55 $51,874.00 Refer 325 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste Disposal-MCIS Invoice 000112178 3/82021 Transaction Date 3/112021 _ WASTEWATER SVCS APRIL 2021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $75,072.50 $75,072.50 Refer 326 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR, INCORP Cash Payment E 101-41930-440 Other Contractual Servic FEBRUARY 2021- MONTHLY SVCE- PUBLIC $60.00 SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR Invoice 893344 2262021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-440 Other Contractual Servic FEBRUARY 2021- MONTHLY SVCE- PUBLIC $60.00 SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR Invoice 893344 2262021 Cash Payment E 285-46388-440 Other Contractual Servic FEBRUARY 2021- MONTHLY SVCE- $120.00 PARKING DECK ELEVATOR Invoice 893344 2262021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 327 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples WATER TESTS- IRON MANGANESE, $308.00 CALCIUM & MAGNESIUM FOR WATER STUDY Invoice 1075278 2222021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $110.00 WATER TESTS -10 Invoice 1075771 2252021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $418.00 Refer CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 328 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIO _ 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 8 Cash Payment E 222-42260-124 Fire Pens Contrib MARCH 2O21 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $11,275.00 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 031121 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,275.00 Refer 309 MOUND WESTONKA SCHOOL DIS _ Cash Payment E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense FEBRUARY 2021 PERFORMING ARTS $425.00 CENTER FEES- SOUND/LIGHT TECHNICIAN, & HOST - CITY COUNCIL MTGS FEB 9TH & FEB 23RD; PLANNING COMMISSION MTG FEB 2ND Invoice 031121 2242021 Project CV-19 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $425.00 Refer 329 MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC. _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs PIN -ARM, PIN -ROLL SLOTTED, GREASE $566.19 FITTINGS, LOCKING NUTS, WASHERS, SCREWS- PARKS EQUIPMENT Invoice 1290458 2/192021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BALL JOINT- PARKS EQUIPMENT $148.47 Invoice 1290239 2/172021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $714.66 Refer 330 NEWMAN SIGNS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials SIGN MATERIALS- 38" X 50 YDS BALCK FILM $664.21 ROLL Invoice 028763 2252021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $664.21 Refer 331 OFFICE DEPOT _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies 18 CLIPBOARDS- PUBLIC WORKS Invoice 1559795297001 2242021 PO 25196 Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies STAPLES, COPY PAPER - CITY HALL Invoice 155979097001 2252021 PO 25196 Cash Payment E 609-49750-205 Computer Hardware/Soft DATA STIDK PRO USB DRIVES 10 PK 8 GB- HWS Invoice 151120791001 2/152021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-322 Postage BOOK OF 20 FOREVER STAMPS- HWS Invoice 151135427001 2/122021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 332 OTTENBREIT, JEFF Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 031121 2252021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Refer 323 PERFORMANCE PLUS LLC Cash Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical Services Invoice 9242 2/192021 Transaction Date 3/122021 FUEL @ SPEEDWAY 2-20-21 - FIRE TRUCK REIMBURSE J. OTTENBREIT $11.89 $38.38 $49.99 $11.00 $111.26 $23.63 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.63 MEDICAL EXAM, DRUG SCREEN- RETURN TO DUTY- D. POIKENEN Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 325 PERMIT WORKS, LLC _ $609.00 $609.00 2+L� CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 9 Cash Payment E 101-42400-440 Other Contractual Servic 2021 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT- $1,495.00 PERMITS & INSPECTIONS Invoice 2021-0029 1262021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,495.00 Refer 326 POSTMASTER _ Cash Payment E 101-41110-322 Postage USPS MARKETING MAIL- ANNUAL BULK $245.00 MAILING PERMIT 2021 Invoice 031121 3202021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $245.00 Refer 324 R.C. ELECTRIC, INC Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic CHANGE SWITCH @ CENTENNIAL BLDG- 1- $162.50 19-21 Invoice 7499 1202021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $162.50 Refer 327 REPUBLIC SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic FEBRUARY 2021 CITYWIDE RECYCLING SVC $14,494.95 Invoice 0894-005356844 2252021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,494.95 Refer 328 SAL VAT/, MICHAEL & JENNIFER _ Cash Payment G 281-22000 Deposits REFUND LOST LAKE DOCK KEY DEPOSIT- M $50.00 & J. SALVATI Invoice 031121 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 303 STORMS WELDING & MFG _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REPAIR CHIPPER BOX $1,292.11 Invoice 59514 1/122021 Transaction Date 3/112021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,292.11 Refer 304 SUN NEWSPAPERS-HWS ACCT. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising BEST OF --VOTING AD 3-06-21 $199.00 Invoice 823936 3172021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-328 Employment Advertising PARKS- SEASONAL HELP WANTED AD 3-06- $147.00 21 Invoice 823860 3172021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $346.00 Refer 305 TONKA PLUMBING HEATING & CL _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic FURNISH & INSTALL 3 PHASE ELECTRIC $2,000.00 HEATER @ BOOSTER PUMP STATION ON ISLAND- 2-18-21 Invoice 12279 2232021 Project 20-3 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,000.00 Refer 306 TR1-STATE BOBCAT, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SIDE MIRROR KIT FOR AVANT SIDEWALK $44.92 MACHINE Invoice P51419 3/42021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs 60" V-BLADE EDGE- PARKS EQUIPMENT $396.25 Invoice P49518 1202021 WO CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies AIR, FUEL, OIL & HYD FILTERS- PARKS EQUIPMENT Invoice P49519 1202021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 307 USA BLUEBOOK Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals Invoice 497162 2/82021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Comments HACH FLUORIDE REAGENT 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 10 $182.54 Total $623.71 $81.12 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 308 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE AFTER HRS 4902 DRUMMOND AVE 2-08-21 Invoice 11120 2252021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE AFTER HRS 1599 BLUEBIRD LN 2-09-21 Invoice 11120 2252021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $81.12 $485.96 $399.04 $885.00 Refer 31OWES TSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE AND _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs 4 SNOW PLUS TIRES, AIR LIQUID TIRE $6,070.76 VALVE, O'RING & MOUNTING- JOHN DEERE LOADER Invoice 876718-2 2/162021 Project 21-4 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs CREDIT PKS DEPT- SB SPLIT ALL DEPTS- 4-$6,070.76 SNOW PLUS TIRES, AIR LIQUID TIRE VALVE, O'RING & MOUNTING- PARKS - JOHN DEERE LOADER Invoice 876718-2 2/162021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $0.00 Refer 311 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATERMAIN @ 1599 BLUEBIRD LN 2-09-21 Invoice 4916 2/172021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATER MAIN @ 4902 DRUMMOND RD 2-08-21 Invoice 4917 2/172021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 314 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21- DEPOT BLDG ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 $4,380.00 $8,580.25 $12,960.25 $122.75 $157.27 -$1,100.70 $1,063.99 $3,455.52 $1,229.40 W11llf Cash Payment E 101-41930-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 285-46388-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 71847012072206 322021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Refer 313 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 721792989 3/12021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 721740858 2262021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 721704463 2262021 Transaction Date 3/122021 Refer 312 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 722222420 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/122021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 ELECTRIC SVC - 1-26-21 TO 2-26-21 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ELECTRIC SVC CARLOW RD LIFT STATION- 1-25-21 THRU 2-25-21 ELECTRIC SVC 1871 COMMERCE BLVD LIFT STATION- 1-25-21 THRU 2-25-21 1790 COMMERCE STREET LIGHTS 1-25-21 THRU 2-25-21 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 03/12/21 10:03 AM Page 11 $1,855.18 $1,855.18 $666.87 $2,049.37 $45.04 $11,399.87 $104.42 $155.78 $32.19 $292.39 ELECTRIC SVC 2-03-21 THRU 3-02-21 CITY $4,677.29 OWNED STREET LIGHTS Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $37,137.58 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $24,796.87 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $1,039.68 285 HRA/HARBOR DISTRICT $5,703.55 601 WATER FUND $25,242.21 602 SEWER FUND $93,871.59 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $11,033.02 670 RECYCLING FUND $14,494.95 $213,319.45 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $213,319.45 Total $213,319.45 $4,677.29 ;A CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Payments Batch 031621CTYMAN $1,341.11 Refer 323 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair HONDA PORTABLE LIGHTS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 6974-407639 2/62021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair ROCKER SWITCH- FIRE ENGINE #24 Invoice 6974-407630 2/62021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Faroo 10100 Refer 324 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PA49 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 6974-408351 2/162021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 6974-408519 2/182021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 6974-408519 2/182021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 6974-409263 2262021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Refer 322 JUBILEE FOODS-(HWS) Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 022821 2/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 022821 2/132021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 022821 2/132021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 022821 2/192021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 022821 2232021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Refer 321 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 022820 2222021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Refer 319 MAYER LUMBER COMPANY, INCO Cash Payment E 281-45210-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 196774 2/22021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Refer 320 TRUE VALUE HWS Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 173364 2/172021 03/16/21 9:17 AM Page 1 $22.31 $13.93 Total $36.24 HOSE CRIMP, BULK HYDRAULIC HOSES- $48.68 TRUCK #314 STREETS DEPT HYDRAULIC FITTINGS-TRUCK#217 SEWER $5.20 DEPT 2 SQUARE LED WORK LAMPS- TRUCK #217 $100.28 SEWER DEPT LIL TREE AIR FRESHENERS, NATURAL RUB $61.04 30 IN HANDLE- PUBLIC WORKS SHOP Wells Fargo 10100 Total $215.20 WHTE VINEGAR- CLEANING @ HWS $4.98 PLASTIC DINNERWARE -FORKS- HWS $3.95 Project CV-19 WHTE VINEGAR- CLEANING @ HWS $4.98 PROPANE EXCHANGE- SAMPLING SHANTY- $21.37 HWS Project CV-19 WHTE VINEGAR- CLEANING @ HWS $7.47 Wells Fargo 10100 SODA, GATORADE, COOKIES- FIRE TRAINING EVENT 2-22-21 Wells Fargo 10100 CEDAR QTY 10- 5/4 X 6'- DOCKS Total $42.75 $22.43 Total $22.43 $324.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $324.00 8 PK TOE WARMERS, 10 PK HAND $19.22 WARMERS- HWS- FOR WHISKEY RELEASE EVENT @ PARKING DECK O Transaction Date 3/162021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/16/21 9:17 AM Page 2 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19.22 Refer 318 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS- FIRE DEPT- TRUCK #40 Invoice 173499 2272021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-322 Postage FED-EXSHIPPING TO ANCOM TECHNICAL - PAGER REPAIR Invoice 173379 2/182021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-322 Postage FED-EXSHIPPING TO ANCOM TECHNICAL - PAGER REPAIR Invoice 173263 2/92021 Transaction Date 3/152021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2.43 $17.35 $17.33 $37.11 Refer 325 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage FEDEX SHIPPING CHARGE- WATER $18.03 SAMPLES- MN DEPT OF HEALTH Invoice 173144 2/12021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply UTILITY LOCK $6.74 Invoice 173145 2/12021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies GLADE FRESHENER, CLEAN LINEN SPRAY, $43.26 16 PKAA BATTERIES, 25' EXTENSION CORD Invoice 173174 2/32021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply WELL #3- INTERIOR LATEX PAINT, 2" CHIP $39.19 BRUSH, KNIT COVER Invoice 173184 2/32021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS $1.76 Invoice 173198 2/42021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS $2.48 Invoice 173199 2/42021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS $6.80 Invoice 173207 2/52021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply 4LB ENGINEER HAMMER $19.79 Invoice 173271 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply GLOSS BLUE P[AINT, GLOSS ENAMEL $15.59 SPRAY, BLUE TAPE Invoice 173283 2/112021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply JOHN DEERE GREEN SPRAY P[AINT $4.94 Invoice 173292 2/112021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 3/4 GALVANIZED PLUG $2.69 Invoice 173318 2/132021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 6 PC SCREW SET, 14 KEYS, $141.19 SCREWDRIVER, FLAP DISC, 2 TOOL BAGS WITH POCKETS Invoice 173337 2/162021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies SPARK LIGHTER, 2" CHIP BRUSH, 1 1/2 CHIP $38.93 BRUSH, 2 PK 9V LITHIUM BATTERIES, 4 PK C ALKALINE BATTERIES Invoice 173356 2/172021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 10" PLASTIC WALL CLOCK- PUBLIC WORKS $11.69 SHIP Invoice 173397 2/192021 Project 21-4 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply WELL #8- 2" & 2 12" CHIP BRUSHES $5.90 Invoice 173437 2232021 il"'9 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 173453 2242021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 173454 2242021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 173441 2232021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 173480 2252021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 173476 2252021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 173346 2/162021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 173433 2232021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 173103 1282021 Cash Payment E 281-45210-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 173103 1282021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Refer 317 TRUE VALUE, NAVARRE Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 117982 2/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 118083 2/102021 Transaction Date 3/152021 WELL #8- INTERIOR LATEX PAINT WELL #8- 9" POLY FOAM ROLL COVER ERGONOMIC WIRE STAPLER, 1000 PK 3/8" STAPLES SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS, BITS R19 - 15" X 19' 2 KRAFT ROLL 110 OZ 50:1 FUEL/OIL, 25' HOSE, SEAL TAPE, SWIV & MALE CONNECTORS SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS - CREDIT PARKS- PD FROM STMT- AP RECVD INVC AFTER PD SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS- DOCKS Wells Fargo 10100 Total 03/16/21 9:17 AM Page 3 $111.92 $5.37 $34.63 $2.87 $23.11 $35.09 $50.62 -$68.38 $68.38 $622.59 100 CT XL VINYL GLOVES- HWS $15.99 Project CV-19 ICE MACHINE SUPPLIES- HWS $5.58 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $167.62 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $95.78 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $392.38 601 WATER FUND $239.13 602 SEWER FUND $362.66 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $83.54 $1,341.11 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $1,341.11 Total $1,341.11 $21.57 Payments Batch 0221UNIFIRST Refer 326 UNIFIRST CORPORATION CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 $1,760.52 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900605184 2/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900606487 2/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900607817 2/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900609115 2242021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900610441 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Refer 327 UNIFIRST CORPORATION Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900602547 1202021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900602547 1202021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900602547 1202021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900602547 1202021 Transaction Date 3/162021 MATS & CLEANING SUPPLIES- HWS- TERRYCLOTHS, MOPS, WIPERS- 2-03-20 MATS & CLEANING SUPPLIES- HWS- TERRYCLOTHS, MOPS, WIPERS- 2-10-20 MATS & CLEANING SUPPLIES- HWS- TERRYCLOTHS, MOPS, WIPERS- 2-17-20 MATS & CLEANING SUPPLIES- HWS- TERRYCLOTHS, MOPS, WIPERS- 2-24-20 MATS & CLEANING SUPPLIES- HWS- TERRYCLOTHS, MOPS, WIPERS- 3-03-20 Wells Fargo 10100 Total MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 1-20-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 1-20-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 1-20-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 1-20-21 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 333 UNIFIRST CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-24-21 Invoice 0900609087 2242021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-24-21 Invoice 0900609087 2242021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-24-21 Invoice 0900609087 2242021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-24-21 Invoice 0900609087 2242021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 331 UNIFIRST CORPORATION Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900609114 2242021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900609114 2242021 Total 03/16/21 11:34 AM Page 1 $57.79 $63.04 $57.79 $55.37 $33.64 $267.63 $17.41 $17.42 $17.41 $17.42 $69.66 $25.90 $23.82 $19.97 $31.83 $101.52 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC $56.70 WORKS 2-24-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC $56.69 WORKS 2-24-21 W11 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900609114 2242021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900609114 2242021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Refer 328 UNIFIRST CORPORATION Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900607816 2/172021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900607816 2/172021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900607816 2/172021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900607816 2/172021 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 2-24-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 2-24-21 Wells Fargo 10100 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 2-17-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 2-17-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 2-17-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 2-17-21 Transaction Date 3/162021 Due 1/212021 Wells Fargo Refer 330 UNIFIRST CORPORATION Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900606486 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900606486 2/102021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900606486 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900606486 2/102021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Refer 332 UNIFIRST CORPORATION Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900603854 1272021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900603854 1272021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900603854 1272021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900603854 1272021 Transaction Date 3/162021 10100 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 2-10-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 2-10-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 2-10-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS 2-10-21 03/16/21 11:34 AM Page 2 $56.70 $56.69 Total $226.78 $17.41 $17.41 $17.42 $17.42 Total $69.66 $48.28 $48.28 $48.27 $48.28 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $193.11 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC $17.41 WORKS 1-27-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC $17.42 WORKS 1-27-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC $17.41 WORKS 1-27-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC $17.42 WORKS 1-27-21 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $69.66 Refer 334 UNIFIRST CORPORATION _ CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900610440 3/32021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900610440 3/32021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900610440 3/32021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900610440 3/32021 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 3-03-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 3-03-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 3-03-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 3-03-21 Transaction Date 3/162021 Due 1/212021 Wells Fargo Refer 329 UNIFIRST CORPORATION Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900605183 2/32021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900605183 2/32021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900605183 2/32021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0900605183 2/32021 10100 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 2-03-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 2-03-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 2-03-21 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES- PUBLIC WORKS- 2-03-21 Transaction Date 3/162021 Due 1/212021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 335 UNIFIRST CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 3-03-21 Invoice 0900610414 3/32021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 3-03-21 Invoice 0900610414 3/32021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 3-03-21 Invoice 0900610414 3/32021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 3-03-21 Invoice 0900610414 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 336 UNIFIRST CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-03-21 Invoice 0900605156 2/32021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-03-21 Invoice 0900605156 2/32021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-03-21 Invoice 0900605156 2/32021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-03-21 Invoice 0900605156 2/32021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 337 UNIFIRST CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-17-21 Invoice 0900607790 2/172021 03/16/21 11:34 AM Page 3 $17.41 $17.41 $17.42 $17.42 Total $69.66 $17.41 $17.41 $17.42 $17.42 Total $69.66 $25.90 $23.82 $19.97 $31.83 Total $101.52 $25.90 $29.76 $19.97 $31.83 Total $107.46 $25.90 IN CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/16/21 11:34 AM Page 4 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-17-21 $29.76 Invoice 0900607790 2/172021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-17-21 $19.97 Invoice 0900607790 2/172021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-17-21 $31.83 Invoice 0900607790 2/172021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $107.46 Refer 338 UNIFIRST CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-10-21 $25.90 Invoice 090060648 2/102021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-10-21 $23.82 Invoice 090060648 2/102021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-10-21 $19.97 Invoice 090060648 2/102021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 2-10-21 $31.83 Invoice 090060648 2/102021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101.52 Refer 339 UNIFIRST CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 1-27-21 $26.26 Invoice 0900603826 1272021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 1-27-21 $30.12 Invoice 0900603826 1272021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 1-27-21 $20.33 Invoice 0900603826 1272021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 1-27-21 $32.18 Invoice 0900603826 1272021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.89 Refer 340 UNIFIRST CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 1-20-21 $20.71 Invoice 0900602520 1202021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 1-20-21 $23.82 Invoice 0900602520 1202021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 1-20-21 $19.97 Invoice 0900602520 1202021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC PUBLIC WORKS 1-20-21 $31.83 Invoice 0900602520 1202021 Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $96.33 rl"'L Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 10100 Wells Fargo $783.77 $332.17 $376.95 $267.63 $1,760.52 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,760.52 Total $1,760.52 03/16/21 11:34 AM Page 5 W1101 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Payments Batch FEB21 HOISNGT $6,753.65 Refer 343 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, 1 _ Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS FEBRUARY 2021 Invoice 020-002-13 3/142021 Cash Payment G 101-23451 VILLAGES OF ISLAND PAR VILLAGES OF ISLAND PARK LAND USE & PLAT- PLANNING SVCS FEBRUARY 2021 Invoice 020-002-13 3/142021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs ZONING/SUBDIVISION CODE UPDATES - PLANNING SVCS FEBRUARY 2021 Invoice 020-002-13 3/142021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs ZONING DISTRICT CHANGES- PLANNING SVCS FEBRUARY 2021 Invoice 020-002-13 3/142021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs SUBDIVISION & PUD CHANGES- PLANNING SVCS FEBRUARY 2021 Invoice 020-002-13 3/142021 Cash Payment E 285-46388-300 Professional Srvs MOUND HARBOR DISTRICT PARK STUDY- MISC PLANNING SVCS FEBRUARY 2021 Invoice 021-003-1 3/142021 Project HDPARK Transaction Date 3/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $5,818.65 285 HRA/HARBOR DISTRICT $935.00 $6,753.65 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $6,753.65 Total $6,753.65 03/16/21 2:56 PM Page 1 $967.50 $1,569.90 $1,503.75 $1,237.50 $540.00 $935.00 $6,753.65 <16W CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Payments Batch 032321CITY $90,479.45 Refer 606 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers -Fire Dept. Invoice 100530 322021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Refer 400 ASPEN EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 10226854 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Refer 401 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 032321 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/172021 REPLACE THE CONNECTOR AUDIO SWITCH KIT ON MINITOR PAGER- FIRE DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 PLOW PARTS- BOLT KIT, BOLT BAG Wells Fargo 10100 03/18/21 12:19 PM Page 1 $170.00 Total $170.00 $97.38 Total $97.38 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 $334.01 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 $1,892.76 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 DEPOT BLDG $295.58 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 $1,013.78 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 $548.08 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 $655.40 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 $716.32 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 $548.08 GAS SVC 1-19-21 TO 2-19-21 $548.08 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 402 EGAN COMPANIES _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maintenance STREET LIGHT REPAIRS- 2021 WINTER MAINTENANCE Invoice JC10218532 3/52021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maintenance ELECTRICAL REPAIRS / UPGRADES PUBLIC WORKS SHOP Invoice JC10218532 3/52021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,552.09 $2,474.60 $7,350.92 Total Refer 403 ELECTRIC PUMP, INC _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR PUMP @ BARTLETT E-1 LIFT STATION Invoice 0070435 3/82021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs PUMP REPAIR PARTS- FLUSH VALVE KIT, BARTLETT E-1 LIFT STATION Invoice 0070434 3/82021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL REPAIRED PUMP & PULL OUT LOANER @ BARTLETT E-1 LIFT STATION Invoice 0070436 3/82021 $9,825.52 $4,497.65 $2,523.29 $427.95 �612,T� Transaction Date 3/172021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 404 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES, 1 _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies CUSTOM 6" LIEUTENANT SHIELDS- 5 QTY- #11, #12, #14, & #16; 4 QTY 6" CAPTAIN SHIELDS- #12, #14, #15, & #16; 1 ASST. CHIEF SHIELD- #4 Invoice 10739 2/182021 03/18/21 12:19 PM Page 2 $7,448.89 $529.50 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $529.50 Refer 607 FIRE SAFETY USA, INCORPORATE _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies UTILITY STRAP MOUNTING SYSTEM 16" - $80.00 25"- FIRE DEPT Invoice 144308 2/152021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies FQUIC-MOUNT DOUBLE PREMIX FUEL $169.00 HOLDERS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 144794 3/32021 Transaction Date 3/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $249.00 Refer 605 FIRE SERVICE CERT OF MINNESO _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training FIREFIGHTER II CERTIFICATION EXAMS- 5 $600.00 NEW FIREFIGHTERS 2-13-21-T. POUNDER, R. MAHONEY, M. JABS, S. CALDERON, D. BEININGEN Invoice 8482 2/182021 Transaction Date 3/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $600.00 Refer 405 FIRSTSOURCE SOLUTIONS _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREEN $56.38 Invoice FL00427409 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $56.38 Refer 608 GEAR WASH, LLC _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies ANNUAL CLEAN & REPAIR FIREFIGHTER $4,934.34 JACKETS & TURNOUT GEAR- 32 SETS Invoice 17340 2232021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies ANNUAL CLEAN & REPAIR FIREFIGHTER $31.32 TROUSERS- 1 PAIR Invoice 17370 3/12021 Transaction Date 3/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,965.66 Refer 406 HEALTH PARTNERS CLINICS _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services DOT EXAM - RANDOM TESTING- PUBLIC $32.00 WORKS & PARKS Invoice 4231 322021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.00 Refer 649 HOME DEPOT/GECF (PNV) _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 2 OIL -FILLED RADIATOR HEATERS- $99.94 BOOSTER STATIONS Invoice 5603824 2/162021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 2 QTY 10-TINE WELDED BEDDING FORKS, 2 $316.89 QTY 24" SQUEEGEE W/ HANDLES, MAK 18V BLUETOOTH RAD1018PD HEX KEY - STREETS DEPT Invoice 8043808 3/52021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $416.83 �61T CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Refer 407 JOHNSON CONTROLS - TYCO INC. Cash Payment E 101-41930-440 Other Contractual Servic REPLACE QUICK RESPONSE SPRINKLERS - COLLECTED HEADS FOR TESTING- PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG Invoice 87557503 2282021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-440 Other Contractual Servic REPLACE QUICK RESPONSE SPRINKLERS - COLLECTED HEADS FOR TESTING- PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG Invoice 87557503 2282021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 477 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATI _ Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2021 CITY WIDE RESIDENT YARD WASTE DISPOSAL Invoice 032321 3/152021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 408 MEDIACOM _ Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 3-16-21 THRU 4- 15-21 Invoice 032321 3/62021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 409 MIDWEST SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- FEB 2021- TRUCK #312, #220 Invoice 8174 3/12021 Project 21-4 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- FEB 2021- TRUCK #219, AVANT#220 Invoice 8174 3/12021 Project 21-4 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- FEB 2021- TRUCK #420, #314, #216, #120 Invoice 8174 222021 Project 21-4 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- FEB 2021 TRUCK #314, BOBCAT #120 Invoice 8174 3/12021 Project 21-4 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- FEB 2021- TRUCK #313, #314, #316, WELL GENERATOR #8 Invoice 8174 3/12021 Project 21-4 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- FEB 2021- TRUCK #119, TOOL CAT SALT SPREADER #216, ANGLE BROOM 68" Invoice 8174 3/12021 Project 21-4 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- FEB 2021- BOBCAT #111, WELL#3&#8 GENERATORS Invoice 8174 3/12021 Project 21-4 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 410 MINUTEMAN PRESS Cash Payment E 285-46388-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 21352 3/152021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 21339 3/82021 03/18/21 12:19 PM Page 3 $687.50 $687.50 $1,375.00 $6,036.75 $6,036.75 $96.90 $96.90 $720.00 $720.00 $675.00 $720.00 $847.40 $720.00 $585.00 $4,987.40 HARBOR DISTRICT PARK STUDY PRINTED $30.00 CARDS- 200 QTY HARBOR WINE & SPIRITS- SPECIAL $58.36 REQUEST PRINTED CARDS- 1,000 QTY �6123� Transaction Date 3/172021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 477 MNSPECT _ Cash Payment E 101-42400-308 Building Inspection Fees FEBRUARY 2021 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES Invoice 8577 3/82021 Cash Payment G 101-20800 Due to Other Governments FEBRUARY 2021 - ELECTRICAL STATE SURCHARGE FEE CREDIT Invoice 8577 3/82021 Cash Payment R 101-42000-32220 Electrical Permit Fee FEBRUARY 2021- ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PERMIT FEE CREDITS Invoice 8577 3/82021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 476 MULCH STORE, THE Cash Payment E 670-49500-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 106014593 3/162021 Transaction Date 3/172021 2021 CITY WIDE RESIDENT YARD WASTE DISPOSAL 03/18/21 12:19 PM Page 4 $88.36 $16,505.07 -$19.00 -$241.00 $16,245.07 $13,300.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,300.00 Refer 479 NEWMAN SIGNS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials SIGN MATERIALS- 4 QTY- IN -STREET PED CROSSING- STOP- SAFE HIT, POST REPLACMENTS, HARDWARE SET FOR MOUNTING Invoice 029166 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Refer 478 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 157970866001 2/172021 PO 25241 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 4 BOXES AA BATTERIES, 3- Each 1" , 1 1/2" & 2" BINDERS- FIRE DEPT $1,170.70 $1,170.70 $67.23 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.23 Refer 480 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS, LLC _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-307 Admin/Finance/Compute FEB 2021 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 210264 3/122021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-307 Admin/Finance/Compute FEB 2021 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 210264 3/122021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage FEB 2021- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE Invoice 210264 3/122021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage FEB 2021- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE Invoice 210264 3/122021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 481 OSBORN, DAVID _ Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2640 SETTER CIRCLE- D. OSBORN- UTILITY REFUND Invoice 032321 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 471 SUN NEWSPAPERS-HWS ACCT. $1,778.44 $1,778.45 $315.66 $315.65 $4,188.20 $222.44 $222.44 � 14- CITY OF MOUND 03/18/21 12:19 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising HELP WANTED -PT SALESCLERK AD 3-13- $110.00 21- HWS Invoice 726874 9222019 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $110.00 Refer 472 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY _ Cash Payment G 101-23451 VILLAGES OF ISLAND PAR PUB HEARING -LEGAL NTCE- MAJOR $84.81 SUBDIVISION & RE -ZONING, CUP & SITE DEVELOPMENT- VILLAGES OF ISLAND PARK 18-UNIT DEVELOPMENT 4451 WILSHIRE BLVD -PUBLISHED 3-13-21 Invoice 824464 3/132021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $84.81 Refer 473 USA SAFETY SUPPLY CORP _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 13 RIPSTOP SOFTSHELL JACKETS- FLEECE $213.32 LINING- WI/ LOGO EMBROIDERED- PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS STAFF Invoice 144024 3/82021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 13 RIPSTOP SOFTSHELL JACKETS- FLEECE $213.32 LINING- WI/ LOGO EMBROIDERED- PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS STAFF Invoice 144024 3/82021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 13 RIPSTOP SOFTSHELL JACKETS- FLEECE $213.32 LINING- WI/ LOGO EMBROIDERED- PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS STAFF Invoice 144024 3/82021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 13 RIPSTOP SOFTSHELL JACKETS- FLEECE $213.32 LINING- WI/ LOGO EMBROIDERED- PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS STAFF Invoice 144024 3/82021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $853.28 Refer 0 VERIZON WIRELESS _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT SPOT- $35.01 SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $35.01 SPOT 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- $35.01 INTERNET SVC- 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - $35.01 TABLET- INTERNET SVC- 7-11-19 THRU 8-10- 19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Project 20-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - $35.01 TABLET- HOT SPOT SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10- 19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Project 20-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $17.50 SPOT- SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $17.51 SPOT- SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 �6113� CITY OF MOUND 03/18/21 12:19 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $35.01 SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NEW STREETS TABLET DATACARD $35.01 INTERNET SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NEW STREETS TABLET $0.00 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY 7726- NEW TABLET- INTERNET SVC $17.50 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY 7726- NEW TABLET- INTERNET SVC $17.51 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 7-11- $35.01 19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON $35.01 DATACARD SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Project 20-3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC $35.01 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Project 20-3 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 7-11-19 $17.51 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 7-11-19 $17.50 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #315 DATACARD SVC 7-11- $35.01 19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK#512 R. PRICH DATACARD $35.01 SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.51 SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.50 SVC 7-11-19 THRU 8-10-19 Invoice 9848082291 2/102020 Transaction Date 2202020 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $560.16 Refer 474 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF MN, IN Cash Payment E 101-41930-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispose GARBAGE SVC APRIL 2021- CITY HALL & $123.85 FIRE DEPT Invoice 7476941-1593-8 3/32021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispose GARBAGE SVC APRIL 2021- CITY HALL & $123.85 FIRE DEPT Invoice 7476941-1593-8 3/32021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispose GARBAGE SVC APRIL 2021- PUB WKS $1,109.47 BLDG- INCLUDES OVERAGE 2-25-21 Invoice 7476942-1593-6 3/32021 Project 21-3 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,357.17 �61?3� CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Refer 475 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic CUT IN GATE VALVE WATERMAIN BRIGHTON -WILSHIRE 2-22-21 Invoice 4928 3/82021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATERMAIN @ 6221 LYNWOOD BLVD 2-27-21 Invoice 4929 3/82021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 629 WITSCHORIK KEN & DANIELLE _ Cash Payment R 281-45210-34725 Dock Permits REFUND 2021 DOCK SITE FEE- MOVING OUT OF MOUND- K. WITSCHORIK Invoice 032321 3/182021 Cash Payment R 281-45210-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND 2021 DOCK LMCD FEE- MOVING OUT OF MOUND- K. WITSCHORIK Invoice 032321 3/182021 Transaction Date 3/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 648 ZOLL MEDICAL CORP Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies Invoice 3248432 3/122021 PO 25244 Transaction Date 3/182021 3 PK LIFEBAND FOR AUTO PULSE- FIRE DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $30,967.30 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $9,699.98 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $340.00 285 HRAMARBOR DISTRICT $30.00 601 WATER FUND $11,238.72 602 SEWER FUND $24,079.69 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $823.76 670 RECYCLING FUND $13,300.00 $90,479.45 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $90,479.45 Total $90,479.45 Total 03/18/21 12:19 PM Page 7 $3,480.00 $4,558.25 $8,038.25 $325.00 $15.00 $340.00 $414.48 $414.48 «5,127> Payments Batch 032321 HWS Refer 630 56 BREWING, LLC CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 $95,368.18 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 5613591 3/162021 Transaction Date 3/182021 BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 600 AMPHORA IMPORTS LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 10159 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 10159 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Total 03/18/21 11:56 AM Page 1 $119.01 $144.00 $6.75 $150.75 Refer 601 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $291.20 Invoice 3463349 3/122021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $291.20 Refer 603 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $475.95 Invoice 0088323600 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.65 Invoice 0088323600 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $38.00 Invoice 0088369800 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $3.10 Invoice 0088369800 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,952.11 Invoice 0088368000 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $29.99 Invoice 0088368000 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,851.15 Invoice 00884774400 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $20.40 Invoice 00884774400 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,375.35 Refer 631 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS, DUM DUM POPS, UPC $188.95 SHELF STRIPS Invoice 0102914400 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $75.95 Invoice 0102914100 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $41.10 Invoice 008474900 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT -$19.00 Invoice 0088412000 3/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.55 Invoice 0088412000 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $285.45 Refer 602 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ �6T8� CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/18/21 11:56 AM Page 2 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $48.55 Invoice 0102878500 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $127.70 Invoice 0102878700 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- BOMB SHOT CUPSSHOT CUPS $23.40 Invoice 0102878500 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $199.65 Refer 604 BRASS FOUNDRY BREWING CO. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $132.00 Invoice 6082 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $132.00 Refer 610 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $178.00 Invoice 338673461 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,266.30 Invoice 338673460 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,444.30 Refer 632 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,419.75 Invoice 338753893 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $165.80 Invoice 338753892 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,585.55 Refer 633 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $136.00 Invoice 338775077 3/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,601.27 Invoice 338754360 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $404.00 Invoice 338775076 3/182021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,141.27 Refer 611 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,024.00 Invoice 338675317 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,193.35 Invoice 338675316 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $40.50 Invoice 338675318 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,257.85 Refer 634 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,707.80 Invoice 2524317 3/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $166.60 Invoice 2524333 3/162021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,874.40 Refer 612 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. _ �16W CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/18/21 11:56 AM Page 3 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,415.10 Invoice 2521626 3/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $97.80 Invoice 2521743 3/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$34.40 Invoice 12070164 3/92021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,478.50 Refer 635 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $491.00 Invoice 572299 3/152021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $29.53 Invoice 572694 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$158.00 Invoice 572351 3/152021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $362.53 Refer 613 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $100.00 Invoice 1366043 3/122021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $662.20 Invoice 1367605 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $762.20 Refer 614 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,029.95 Invoice 393367 3/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $923.70 Invoice 394972 3/162021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,953.65 Refer 609 JACK PINE BREWERY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $66.00 Invoice 3812 3/92021 Transaction Date 3/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.00 Refer 636 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $56.30 Invoice 3164454 3/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,604.90 Invoice 3164453 3/182021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,661.20 Refer 615 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,873.80 Invoice 3164427 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,873.80 Refer 618 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $460.50 Invoice 1754834 3/82021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,684.56 Invoice 1754835 3/82021 A CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/18/21 11:56 AM Page 4 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,145.06 Refer 637 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $162.00 Invoice 10980 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,999.98 Invoice 1762378 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $7,691.47 Invoice 1762377 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,853.45 Refer 616 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $48.00 Invoice 1757440 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $856.25 Invoice 1757441 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $469.20 Invoice 1757442 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,649.41 Invoice 1757438 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,657.95 Invoice 1757439 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,680.81 Refer 638 LIBATION PROJECT _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $360.00 Invoice 34220 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 34220 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $364.50 Refer 617 LIBATION PROJECT _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $192.00 Invoice 34069 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $512.00 Invoice 34069 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $6.00 Invoice 34069 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $710.00 Refer 619 LUTHERAN PRAYERBOOK _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 2021 HWS ADVERTISING- WEEKLY $259.00 BULLETIN- 12 MONTHS Invoice 45275 3/52021 Transaction Date 3/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $259.00 Refer 639 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 3-11-20 $404.55 Invoice 37094 3/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 3-4-20 $575.65 Invoice 37078 3/42021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $980.20 Refer 640 MAVERICK WINE COMPANY _ L� CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 03/18/21 11:56 AM Page 5 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $559.92 Invoice 555518 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 555518 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $564.42 Refer 620 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals APRIL 2021 COMMON AREA MTCE & $1,038.13 INSURANCE HWS Invoice 04012021 4/12021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,038.13 Refer 641 OUTSTATE BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $178.00 Invoice 1522 3/152021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $178.00 Refer 621 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $118.00 Invoice 119534 3/82021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 119534 3/82021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $122.50 Refer 642 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $409.50 Invoice 120248 3/152021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $7.00 Invoice 120248 3/152021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $416.50 Refer 622 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $969.25 Invoice 6171276 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,796.35 Invoice 6171275 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $72.00 Invoice 6171277 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,837.60 Refer 643 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 6174967 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 6174968 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 623 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2056148 3/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2056146 3/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 5067091 2262021 $606.00 $1,080.00 Total $1,686.00 $2,904.00 $391.47 $320.00 ON CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2056147 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 645 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 2058674 3/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2058673 3/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2058675 3/182021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Total Refer 624 SP3, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 94948 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 625 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0275093 3/122021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0275092 3/122021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0275093 3/122021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0275092 3/122021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 626 WINE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 166202 3/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 166202 3/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 166203 3/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 166203 3/112021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 646 WINE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 166374 3/122021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 647 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 7321951 3/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 7321950 3/172021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 627 WINE MERCHANTS _ 03/18/21 11:56 AM Page 6 $9,445.92 $13,061.39 $15.00 $3,787.70 $1,204.00 $5,006.70 $400.00 $400.00 $202.71 $288.00 $5.00 $7.50 $503.21 $908.00 $14.85 $408.00 $4.20 $1,335.05 -$576.00 -$576.00 $23.00 $1,166.00 $1.189.00 00611 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 7320964 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 7320963 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 628 Z WINES USA LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 24240 3/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 24240 3/102021 Transaction Date 3/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $95,368.18 $95,368.18 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $95,368.18 Total $95,368.18 03/18/21 11:56 AM Page 7 $69.00 $204.00 Total $273.00 $320.00 $5.00 Total $325.00 ijt MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 9, 2021 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. in the Westonka Schools Performing Arts Center in Minnetrista. Members present: Mayor Ray Salazar; Council Members Phil Velsor, Paula Larson, Sherrie Pugh, and Jason Holt Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Eric Hoversten, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Administrative Services Coordinator Kevin Kelly, City Engineer Brian Simmons, Terry & Linda Olson, Emily Colestock, Rodney Beystrom, Veronica Anderson, Jeff Prieve, Mark McGlinsky, Steve Lynch, Liz Vandam, Betsy & Greg Hedding, Jason & Tirisha Dirks, Eric Schmidt, Douglas Williams, Margo Williams, Jackie Piepkorn, Sam Erickson, Johan Chemin, Brian & Kathleen Olesinksi, Betsy Grady, Danielle Rousselange, Dane Vocelka, Tim Lee, Kaila Hage, Kelly Jaworksi, Paul Levin, Irene Knott, Scott Gregory, Karla Johnston, Troy Jordan, David Holl, Katie Holt, Drew Vocelka, David Lambert, Sam Steadman, Christine Lambert, Justin Dale and PJ McDead. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Salazar called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 2 Pledae of Alleaiance 3. Approve agenda Larson requested Item 4E be pulled from the consent agenda for discussion. Hoversten noted amendments to the agenda include new Item 5.1 — requested action on a Resolution of sponsorship as related to the Westonka Historical Society, and additional comments for Item 7a.; Proposed tattoo studio. MOTION by Velsor, seconded by Pugh, to approve the amended agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Larson, seconded by Holt, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims at 3-12-21 meeting B. Approve minutes: 2-23-21 regular meeting C. Approve Pay Request #3 and Final in the amount of $17,315.92 to Widmer & Mound City Council Minutes — March 9, 2021 Construction for the 2019 Fernside Forcemain Improvement & Bay Ridge Sewer Service City Project PW-19-03 & 09 D. Approve Pay Request #2 in the amount of $207,352.03 to Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for the 2018 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvements— Westedge Blvd, PW-18-01 E. Pulled 4E. (Pulled) Approve Resolution 21- Amending Resolution No. 19-80 that approved vacations in Mound Harbor District (Planning Case No. 19-06) Larson asked for clarification on item 4. E, the Mound Harbor vacation resolution. Smith stated this item is a housekeeping matter with Hennepin County in order to clarify the description of easements and uses vacated under the original Resolution. MOTION by Larson, seconded by Holt, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 21-23: RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 19-80 THAT APPROVED VACATIONS IN MOUND HARBOR DISTRICT PLANNING CASE NO. 19-06 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. Johan Chemin, 6039 Beachwood Road, requested that all meeting attendees follow the mask wearing mandate and be respectful to everyone. Doug Williams, 5479 Lost Lake Lane, stated he wanted to address Item 7 on the agenda. 5.1 (added) Liz Vandam on behalf of Westonka Historical Society requesting action on a Resolution of Sponsorship as Related to the Westonka Historical Society Vandam said this resolution would allow the Westonka Historical Society (WHS) to further and more broadly pursue State grant funding for museum improvements. Vandam stated she is a volunteer at the WHS which curates the history and culture of the communities of Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, Navarre, Orono, Minnetrista and Mound. Vandam said the WHS entered into a discussion on the potential co -location of WHS and the Westonka Hennepin County Public Library in Mound. Vandam is seeking City sponsorship to secure funds, and, if awarded, to be named the bonded recipient agent for those funds. MOTION by Pugh, seconded by Holt, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 21-24: RESOLUTION OF SPONSORSHIP AS RELATED TO THE WESTONKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 6. Orono Police Sergeant Tim Sonnek presenting the Mound activity report for February Hoversten stated Sergeant Sonnek was not able to be present at the meeting and will be asked back at the next Council meeting in March. 7. Planning Commission Recommendation A. Consideration of request for evaluation of tattoo studio as substantially similar use at 0"; Mound City Council Minutes — March 9, 2021 5439 Shoreline Drive in Lost Lake commercial building as provided by City Code Sec. 129-71 Applicant: Dane Vocelka Owner: Samuel C. & Shea F. Steadman Smith presented an overview of the applicant Dane Vocelka's request for a Substantially Similar Use Determination to allow for the operation of a tattoo studio business at the Lost Lake commercial building which also holds Caribou Coffee. Smith noted the packet includes additional comments from Steve Johnson of the Lost Lake Villas Home Owners Association (HOA) for the Council's executive consideration of the matter. Smith stated the Planning Commission has reviewed the application materials from Vocelka and has reviewed the zoning code land use table to determine the use of a tattoo studio is substantially similar to retail sales and service which are allowed uses. Smith added that the property owned by the Steadmans currently houses the Caribou Coffee Shop and a dry cleaner business. Smith said the location of the proposed tattoo studio is in the western portion of the building which has held a Chiropractic business and a health boutique retail business. Smith stated tattoo businesses are licensed by Hennepin County. Smith added that staff feel the use is appropriate and substantially similar to over the counter retail business activity. Smith added the Planning Commission approved the use at the February 2nd meeting and concludes that the tattoo studio is similar in use to those allowed in the Pedestrian PUD district. Smith said the Planning Commission agreed that the tattoo studio is a permissible retail sale and service use and is similar to a nail salon as the proposed business is a small in scope tattoo studio. Smith said the business will have only three or four employees and will be a retail store which will also sell art supplies and custom fishing guide services. Smith noted there is no requirement for a public hearing on this matter but did mail a notice to neighbors as a courtesy. Smith said the packet includes the draft resolution with staff and Planning Commission recommendations and noted the 60-day agency land use approval/denial clock is nearing its end. Dane Vocelka, 236 25th Street SE of Buffalo, Minnesota, addressed the Council by stating he is an ambitious business man who will strive to keep the business small and private. Vocelka said he has lived on Wilshire Blvd. in Mound previously and the space is a great fit for him and he would love to work with everyone in the community. Vocelka said in addition to the tattoo studio his business would offer services to professional' artists and also fishing guide services. Vocelka added he would keep the exterior of the building professional and tasteful. Pugh asked Vocelka what kind of traffic would the business add to the coffee shop area and how many clients per day would he work with. Vocelka said a typical work day would include one or two clients. Vocelka added that due to the Governor's Executive Order only one customer could be present with no more than two artists at a time. Vocelka said client information is exchanged through phone calls or remote email consultations and he added he liked to be home with his family at night. Doug Williams addressed the Council by stating he didn't get enough advance notice of the meeting to prepare comments. Velsor stated the HOA was informed about the meeting so why did they submit input to the agenda so late in the process. Williams said he was traveling at the time and didn't have the access to visit with HOA members. DNA Mound City Council Minutes — March 9, 2021 Doug Williams stated he is the President of the Lost Lake Villas HOA and lives at 5479 Lost Lake Lane. Williams said the HOA Board called an emergency meeting to declare unanimous opposition to the tattoo studio and would like to delay a decision of the Council as the HOA believes the tattoo studio is not substantially similar to other allowed uses and that tattoo businesses are regulated in the Adult Business portion of the City Code and should not be located within 200 feet of a residence. Williams said at least seven residences are within 200 feet and the first thing you would see when entering the Villas is a tattoo parlor. Williams added the business is literally within 83 feet of our backyard. Velsor asked Williams what other uses Williams ascribes to the tattoo studio. Williams answered it is equivalent to massage parlors and suggested another location for the business within the City. Velsor asked Williams what he thinks the problem is going to be with the tattoo studio and Williams stated that their real estate investment value will decrease and the HOA members are primary investors in the Lost Lake Harbor area. Velsor and Holt both stated the proposed tattoo studio is not a derogatory business but it is good to have a community discussion to allow input. Williams said tattoo parlors are regulated by the state as an adult service and that Vocelka's tattoo business has been rejected by other business properties in town. Williams added that the City Lost Lake slips can't be used to conduct business such as bringing in fishing boats. Williams said the Caribou Coffee already attracts boat trailers to the area and customers are parking in private areas of the HOA property. Williams again requested to table decision to the next Council meeting. Salazar asked for a continuance to the March 23rd meeting. Salazar stated that it is only fair to hear their disagreements. Larson said she is in agreement to wait until the next meeting and Velsor said this will give Vocelka time to prepare as well. Pugh agreed to table the discussion and said the HOA should meet with the business owner. Holt said the Planning Commission heard Vocelka speak and wished he would have done more of the same pitch at this Council meeting. Holt said there have been three different businesses within the same space at the building and he wants to see a respectable business. Holt said one of the former businesses in the same space was a CBD retail store which he considers a similar business to the tattoo studio. Salazar added the tattoo industry has vastly changed over the years and people are getting tattoos for many reasons including honoring loved ones and it is not the Council's decision to determine if tattoos are good or bad. Salazar would like to give the HOA time to respond and prepare an argument and also allow Vocelka an additional opportunity to speak. MOTION by Larson, seconded by Pugh, to continue the agenda item to the next Council Meeting, All voted in favor. Motion carried. & Mound City Council Minutes — March 9, 2021 8. City Engineer Brian Simmons presenting on City Water System and Water Quality Brian Simmons, City Engineer, Bolton and Menk, presented to the Council "The State of Our Water." Simmons said the main goals of the City in regards to water service are to be reliable, affordable and safe. Simmons gave an overview of the water distribution system of the City. Simmons said there are currently two active wells, two towers and 48.5 miles of distribution pipes which were installed in the 1950-60's and have been either rebuilt or rehabbed since then. Simmons added the City has been making improvements to the City water system since 2007 to improve water flow throughout the system but especially to the Island which now has three water connections versus one when the improvements began. Simmons said the improvements have produced better water flow which assists fire protection services as well. Simmons said these long-term commitments made by the City to improve infrastructure, service and supply has affected water rates as increases were used to fund the improvements. Simmons said another duty of the City is to provide safe water to residents and to treat and test the water supply at required intervals and report findings to the State. Simmons said those reports include testing for lead and copper content and the chlorine and fluoride treatment to the water supply. Simmons said there is iron and manganese which is naturally in the aquafer and causes the discoloration of the water in some homes in Mound. Simmons stated that testing for manganese has recently begun to be required by the State and in December testing revealed that City wells number 3 and 8 were found in to be above standards and in subsequent January and February resampling found elevated levels of manganese. Simmons said the Minnesota Department of Health has determined through scientific research that manganese exposure over long periods of time can have negative health effects. Simmons added that manganese is not regulated presently but the State made the recommendation to the City to communicate the manganese issue to water users and offer solutions to mitigate those effects. Simmons said the State recommendations are the use of home water filters and the use of bottled water for infants. Simmons said the long-term treatment of the problem can be addressed through home treatment such as reverse osmosis filters or at the source by municipal treatment. The treatment options would also remove iron which contributes to water discoloration. Simmons listed the Cost and Treatment options facing the City: • Reverse osmosis home treatment finished by residents - $250-2,000 • Centralized Treatment plant — $40-50 Million • City construction of two filtration plants to remove iron and manganese $12-18 Million at a $250-270 rate increase per year for construction alone • Lime softening plants remove iron/manganese and water hardness - $22-36 Million This requires a large footprint and increases of $550-600 per year in water rates for construction alone • Iron and manganese sequestering — reduces some rusty water but does not remove iron or manganese at $150-250K which loses effectiveness with age of system • Continue testing and monitoring manganese levels which the City is not required to do CA`6 Mound City Council Minutes — March 9, 2021 Simmons presented potential funding source options which including using water rates, applying for state funding sources and Minnesota Public Facilities Authority clean drinking water revolving fund. Pugh asked if the City could be eligible to receive more than one type of financing. Simmons said yes and there are other options which include low interest loans and direct legislative funding. Holt asked about language in the Resolution which mentioned the manganese exceeding the health advisory level but it has not established the long term health effects. Simmons said the long term effects are being studied but the home owner can now use a home water filter which is effective against manganese. Hoversten said the notice to residents will have very similar language and context to the DOH advisories. Salazar said the increase in water rates was the City response to repair and replace worn out delivery pipes. Salazar added that cities with newer developments don't have infrastructure which has aged into the need for repair. Salazar said modernization adds cost to residents and the City needs to take care of problem before the City is mandated to do the work. Salazar stated a feasibility study is the first step to study this problem. Hoversten said the need to have safe water will put the affordable aspect in jeopardy and the City will try to get in line to be ready to get infrastructure dollars from federal or state sources. Hoversten said the funding will come from outside sources and/or City water rates or through the use of resident filtering and finishing water in their home. Hoversten said the discoloration nuisance might also be addressed by the work to eliminate excess manganese. A. Action to approve a Resolution directing Engineering Staff to Notify Residents and Municipal Water Customers of the Presence of Manganese in the City Water that Exceeds the Minnesota Department of Health Advisory Limit MOTION by Velsor, seconded by Holt, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 21-25: RESOLUTION DIRECTING ENGINEERING STAFF TO NOTIFY RESIDENTS AND MUNCIPAL WATER CUSTOMERS OF THE PRESENCE OF MANGANESE IN CITY WATER THAT EXCEEDS THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADVISORY LIMIT B. Action to approve a Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report on Water Treatment Facilities MOTION by Larson, seconded by Pugh, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 21-26: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES Larson asked about the time line on the study which Simmons said it would take two to three months to prepare the project priority plan so the City will be in line for the outside source funding cycles later in the year. KI Mound City Council Minutes — March 9, 2021 The Council took comments from the audience Johan Chemin asked where the iron was coming from and Simmons responded the sources are coming from underground naturally. Chemin asked about VOC testing which Simmons said is being done frequently and the wells are secure. Simmons said the infrastructure debt has been accumulated to this point for service reliability and not removal of iron or manganese. Hoversten said when debt is retired it can be given back to lower the rate structure or pay for future needs and the tax levy is meant to build up capital reserve funds for City streets, parks and government operations. Kathleen Olesinski, 6230 Setter Circle, said the rates of manganese in the City water should be addressed in the newsletter going out to residents. Rodney Beystrom, 4466 Denbigh Road, stated he has been a resident of Mound since 1987 and hasn't had discoloration problems which he said is due to his use of water softeners. Greg Hainlen, 5542 Bartlett, asked for information on what type of water filter to buy. Steve Lynch, 3117 Highland Blvd., asked how much of his tax levy and how much of his utility bill goes to debt reduction. Hoversten said the utility fees base charges were reduced in 2019. Hoversten added that the typical utility bill is made up of 50% for sewer, water 40% and the remainder made up of recycling and storm sewer. Hoversten added that 60% of the utility costs go to the debt structure and 40% go to operations. Hoversten said the Property Tax Levy goes to Government operations and for areas such as Streets and Parks. Hoversten noted that the Street Projects are paid for through the tax levy, assessments, bonds and cash. Hoversten said water and sewer projects have separate funds which pay for those services. Hoversten added that the utility's 20-year bonds start to come off the books in 2025 through 2028. Hoversten said $70 Million in bonds were issued to cover those debts with $40 Million in outstanding debt left. Jackie Peipkorn, 4820 Canterbury Road, asked if the state determines the toxic level of manganese and Simmons responded the state has not determined if manganese is toxic or has a toxic level for it in its water standards but the City will continue to test and monitor levels in the drinking water supply. Peipkorn asked how long it has been a problem and Simmons said this is the first time it was tested for. Peipkorn asked if the chlorine levels added are monitored not to over treat and Simmons said absolutely it is monitored to ensure it is not too much or too little. Johann Chemin, 6039 Beachwood Road, said he went on vacation and when he came back and his hot water had black sediment and noted Simmons said that is how manganese manifests. Hoversten said draining the water softener is recommended and Chemin asked if it could be added to the advisory notice and Hoversten said the notice needs to focus on the advisory but that info on home water treatment and management is on the city website. Chemir said higher utilities will disenfranchise people. Hoversten agreed and said the balance between providing safe, affordable and reliable water is a difficult challenge. &M Mound City Council Minutes — March 9, 2021 Mayor Salazar thanked the speakers and Simmons and said the Council will look forward to the results of the study. 9. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Council Members/City Manager: Hoversten highlighted the following dates: March 16 Joint Special Meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council via ZOOM. March 23 CC Meeting will be held at the PAC April 13 CC Meeting may be held at the Council Chambers May 8 Mound Minnetrista City Clean Up Day Hoversten thanked all supporters of the Polar Plunge that was hosted this past Saturday and reminded the audience of the MN DOH Covid-19 Vaccine connector sign up as eligibility is opening up on Wednesday. Salazar once again thanked Simmons and Staff for the thorough presentation and thanked the City Council for staying ahead of the curve and supporting what is the right thing to do. B. Reports: Finance — January 2021 Fire — January 2021 Liquor Store — February 2021 C. Minutes: Planning Commission: 02-02-2021 Regular Meeting 10. Adjourn MOTION by Velsor, seconded by Larson, to adjourn at 9:49 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Raymond J. Salazar Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. - 2021 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ADMINISTRATION THE CITY OF MOUND DOES ORDAIN: SECTION L• That Chapter 2, Section 2-87(b), Chief Administrative Officer; duties, be amended as follows: (b) Specific duties. The Manager has the responsibilities provided in the laws governing statutory cities. The Manager may employ an administrative assistant and such other employees, including an administrative intern, as are necessary for the execution of the duties of the office. The Manager's personal office staff is a separate department of the citv administrative service known as the Executive Department. The Manager is designated as the data practices compliance official. SECTION IL• That Chapter 2, Section 2-120(a), Departmental and divisional organization, is amended as follows: (a) Administrative service. The administrative service of the city is divided into the following departments and heads thereof: (1) Executive Department, Citv Manager. (2) Finance & Administrative Services Department. Administrative Services Director. (OM Community Development Department, Community Development Director/Planner. (3j Fire Department, Fire Chief/Emergency Management Director (4) (5) Liquor Operations Department, Liquor Store Manager. (3) J6LPublic Works Department, Public Works Director. SECTION VIIL• That Chapter 2, Section 2-129, Finance and Administration Department, is amended as follows: Sec. 2-129. Finance and Administrative Services i9R Department. The Finanep, Piro.*Rr1C' fl&1T.e fts.fef Administrative Services Director is responsible to the City Manager for the organization, planning, administration and coordination of the finance and administrative services activities of the city. The Finance Director shall report to the Administrative Services Director and shall perform the duties described in the job description for that position, includin& the duties of treasurer, *'^A a..*:. c * n:* n'@�'Eand any additional duties assigned . The Administrative Services Coordinator/City Clerk shall report to the Administrative Services Director and shall perform the duties of the Citv Clerk and 'T'"^ V:4qa4qPA P:.AP4 i ;1Ar-1T-FA.siff@r is designated as the responsible authority for the collection, use, and dissemination of the City's data. &M SECTION XI: The ordinance shall be effective the day after publication. Passed by the City Council this 23rd day of March, 2021. Mayor Raymond J. Salazar Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Published in the Laker the of 12021. Effective the day of 12021. iw, n MEMORANDUM Date March 17,2021 To Mayor and City Council From Catherine Pausche Director of Finance and Administrative Services Subject Resolution authorizing transfers As we prepare for the2020 audit of the City's financial statements, we have identified dvee unbudgeted transfers between funds chat require Council authorization Budgeted transfers include the standard transfers for allocating General Fund administrative services (finance HIL IT etc) to the special and enterprise funds, transfers fiom the General Fund to the Area Fire Services Fund for Moard's portion ofthe expenses, and the annual transfer of liquor fiend profits to the General Fund for property tar relief The two major proposed transfers in the resolution have been discussed by the council in the past and this is just a housekeeping issue to obtain formal authorization as part of audit preparation: 1) Resolution 1868(in 2018) authorized the transfer of the General Fund's Park Dedication Fund Balance to the newly created Fund 404 Community Investment Reserve Fund but some additional transactions bit the General Fund and chat balance needs to be moved ovas well in the amount of $25,17398_ 2) The Carcinomas Relief Fund guidance on permitted uses evolved fiom when it was first enacted, and restrictions loosened as time went on and the US Treasury received feedback fiom states and municipalities_ ghat allowed the City to justify use of the remaining $204,205 to reimburse contracted police payroll, which simplifies the required single audit and reduces the associated expense Staff feels it is most appropriate and tramparentto reflect this allocation in a fiend balance transfer to the General Fund vs_ transferring budgeted police payroll expense to Fund203 Other Federal Programs in the aunt of $204205 00. 3) Staff also requests a $1,194 78 transfer ofunbudeeted election related COVM19 expenditures fiom the General Fund to FuA203 OtherFederal Remains that were reimbursed by Hennepin County_ Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution Please let Catherine know if you have any questions regarding this matter in advance of Tuesday's meeting as this is on the Consent Agenda at (952)472 0633_ ThaNc you `Em' CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX RESULTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFERS OF FUNDS WHEREAS, the Mound City Council is required to approve all unbudgeted interfund transfers: and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved Resolution 18-68 Authorizing Transfer of the General Fund's Park Dedication Fund Balance to the Community Investment Capital Fund; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound General Fund has a remaining Park Dedication Fund Balance of $25,173.98; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved Resolution 20-70 Authorizing Acceptance of the 2020 Coronavirus Relief Fund Assistance (CARES) in the amount of $704,205.00; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound created Fund 203 Other Federal Programs to track CARES funds and other federal grants and aid like it; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County allocated a portion of their CARES funds to the City for COVID-19 election related expenses outside budget in the amount of $1194.78; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound authorized the remaining $204,205.00 to be used for police salaries which are expensed out of the General Fund; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota does hereby approve the following fund transfers: $25,173.98 from Fund 101 General Fund - Park Dedication (101-24500) to Fund 404 Community Investment Reserve Capital Fund. $204,205.00 from Fund 203 Other Federal Programs to Fund 101 General Fund to reimburse City for eligible budgeted police salary expenditures as permitted by the CARES Act. $1,194.78 from Fund 101 General Fund Elections to Fund 203 Other Federal Programs for unbudgeted COVID-19 election related expenses reimbursed by Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of March, 2021. Attest: Catherine Pausche. Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar 00 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952)472-0604 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: March 17, 2021 Re: Discussion/Action on Resolution Extending Temporary Regulatory Flexibility Due to COVID 19 Health Pandemic through October 31, 2021 Summary. On May 26, 2020, the City Council approved Resolution 20-50 approving regulatory flexibility to local businesses to adjust operations to accommodate Federal, State, and Local directives in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. The approved resolution delegated authority to the City Manager to approve and disapprove local applications for regulatory flexibility through October 31, 2020. On October 27, 2020, the City Council approved Resolution No. 20-108 which authorized extending regulatory flexibility through April 30, 2021. As public health conditions, emergency orders, and public health guidelines are anticipated to remain in effect for the foreseeable future, a resolution to extend authorizing regulatory flexibility through October 31, 2021. Requested Action. Staff recommends approval of the draft resolution. CM CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO 20-108 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE GRANTING OF REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY TO LOCAL BUSINESSES WHEREAS, on May 26, 2020 the City Council approved Resolution 20-50 approving regulatory flexibility to local businesses to adjust operations to accommodate Federal, State, and Local directives in response to the 2020 COVID-19 public health emergency; and WHEREAS, the original Resolution delegated authority to the City Manager to approve and disapprove local applications for regulatory flexibility through October 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, two such applications were received, reviewed and approved: Al and Alma's Outdoor Patio Seating area on private land Surfside Bar and Grill expanded outside seating area on private land ;and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2020, the City Council approved Resolution No. 20-108 which authorized extending regulatory flexibility through April 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, public health conditions, Emergency Orders, and Public Health Guidelines have remained unchanged and are anticipated to continue for the foreseeable future; and WHEREAS, in order to support the continued viability of local businesses, maximize the number of customers allowed to access businesses in light of the state's operating restrictions, and to exercise the creativity encouraged by the Governor's office, the City Council determines it is in the best interests of the City to continue to allow the granting of regulatory flexibility as part of an approved plan submitted by each business seeking such flexibility; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide continued relief to allow local businesses to maximize opportunities for commerce; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby adopts a resolution amending City Resolution No. 20-108 with the following language: 5. The authority delegated herein to the City Manager shall take effect immediately and shall continue through April 39, 2424 October 31, 2021. Adopted by the City Council this 23'' day of March, 2021 Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar 00 Orono Police Deoartment Crime Summary Report Jurisdiction(s): MOUND Time Period: 2/1/2021 12:00:00 AM - 2/28/2021 11:59:00 PM CRIME CATEGORY Aggravated Ass Domestic Assault -Misdemeanor -Intentionally Inflicts/Attempts to Inflict Bodily Harm on Another Counterfeiting/Forgery Give Peace Officer False Name/Birthdate/ID Card Ming Under the Influent Traffic - DWI - Refuse to submit to chemical test; Breath or test refusal or failure 1 1 1 Traffic - DWI - Third -Degree Driving While Impaired; Refuse to submit to chemical test 1 False Pret Fraud in Obtaining Credit-Money/Property Obtained -Sentence Under 609.52 subd. 3 1 Theft -By Swindle 1 Domestic Assault -Misdemeanor -Commits Act to Cause Fear of Immediate Bodily Harm or Death 1 Theft-Take/Drive Motor Vehicle -No Owner Consent 1 ACC -ACCIDENT PUBLIC 2 ACC -MOTOR VEH PROPERTY DAMAGE -HIT & RUN 1 ACC -MOTOR VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE 2 ACC -VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE -FIXED OBJECT 1 ALARM BUSINESS 1 ALARM FALSE 3 ALARM RESIDENCE 1 ASSIST IN LOCATION 1 ASSIST MOTORIST 1 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY 2 ASSIST PUBLIC 6 DISTURB DOMESTIC 4 DISTURB HARASSMENT 4 DISTURB NEIGHBORHOOD 1 Printed: 03/022021 12:46 Page 1 of 3 0 CRIME CATEGORY DISTURB NOISE COMPLAINT 1 DISTURB THREAT 1 DISTURB UNWANTED PERSON 1 FIRE GAS ODOR/LEAK 1 FIRE SINGLE DWELLING 1 FOUND PROPERTY 2 LIFT ASSIST 4 LOST PROPERTY 1 LOST/MISSING PERSON 1 MEDICAL 27 MEDICAL CRISIS 1 MEDICAL MENTAL HEALTH 4 MEDICAL -OVERDOSE 1 MISC FALSE 911 CALL 3 MISC OFCR INFO ID THEFT -TRANS CARD FRAUD 3 MISC OFCR INFORMATION 8 MISC OFCR SEARCH WARRANT SERVICE 1 MISC OFCR TRESPASS NOTICE SERVED 1 MISC OFCR UTILITIES 1 MISC OFCR VEHICLE LOCKOUT 2 MISC OFCR WELFARE CHECK 20 MISC VANDALISM 1 PARKING VIOLATIONS 1 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 1 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 1 Traffic - Careless Driving - Operate any vehicle carelessly on street or highway 2 Traffic Collision - Failure to Notify Owner of Damaged Property 1 Traffic Regulation -Uninsured Vehicle -Driver Violation 1 Traffic -Drivers License -Driving After Revocation 1 Theft-Take/Uselfransfer Movable Prop -No Consent 5 Disseminate Pornographic Work - Minor under age 13 1 Printed: 03/022021 12:46 Page 2 of 3 <6)420> GRAND TOTAL: 138 Printed: 03/022021 12:46 Page 3 of 3 <6 21> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting Planners DATE: March 18, 2021 SUBJECT: Village of Island Park Development(Case No. 21-01) Public Hearings — Major SubdivisionPreliminaryPlat; Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for townhouses and a Residential Shoreland Planned Development Area APPLICANT: Steve Schwanke, Inland Development Partners OWNER: Turnquist Properties LLC LOCATION: 4451 Wilshire Boulevard (PID No. 19-117 23-31-0021 & 19-11]- 23-31-0020) MEETING DATE: March 23, 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed Use ZONING: B-2 General Business District Summary The applicant, Inland Development Partners, has applied for multiple land use and subdivision approvals for the redevelopment of a property on the island. The site is generally west of the intersection of Wilshire and Tuxedo Boulevards at4451 Wilshire Boulevard. The site is the former location of a bar and restaurantthat had a 4,800 squarefoot building and ]] parking stalls. The developmentwill consist of five structures with a total of 18 rental units, including one accessible unit. The structures will comprise of a two unit building, three unit building, two fourunitbuildings, and a fiveunitbuilding. Access to the site will be provided by one driveway on Wilshire Boulevard and one driveway on Tuxedo Boulevard. The buildings will be served by an internal sidewalk system that connects residents to guest parking areas and the exterior of the site. Project Plans Due to file size, the City Council packet contains a site location map and a site plan. The application and full plan set is available at this link. Hardcopies of plans will be provided to City Council members upon individual request. <64zy Public Hearings The City Council will be holding public hearings for the land use and subdivision requests for the Villages at Island Park project at its March 23' meeting. Notification about the public hearings followed state requirements. The notice of public hearings was published on March 13, 2021 in the Laker and posted on the City Hall bulletin board on March 9, 2021. The public hearing notice was also mailed to all affected property owners located within 350 feet of the project area on March 10, 2021. Information was also posted on the City's website on March 12, 2021. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed these land use and subdivision requests at their February 2na and March 3" meetings. The approved meeting minutes from the February 2, 2021 meeting have been included. Also included are the draft minutes from the March 2, 2021 meeting. Community members provided public comment at both meetings. Concerns and questions raised by the public and the Planning Commission included site access, traffic, sidewalk/trails, parking, stormwater, recreational facilities, density, property management, and recreational vehicles. As requested by the Planning Commission, the applicant prepared supplemental materials to address these questions and concerns for consideration at the March 2, 2021 meeting. After consideration of the supplemental information provided by the applicant and staff, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning, major subdivision -preliminary plat, and conditional use permit with the conditions and findings of fact, as recommended by Staff. Supplemental Materials Included in the packet are the presentations slides from Staff and the Applicant for Tuesday's meeting. Recommendation Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolutions have been prepared for City Council consideration. `6423' RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MAJOR SUBDIVISION -PRELIMINARY PLAT OF VILLAGES OF ISLAND PARK PLANNING CASE NO. 21-01 WHEREAS, the applicant, Inland Development Partners, has submitted a major subdivision —preliminary plat application to plat the proposed Villages of Island Park plat as described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the subject site is generally located west of the intersection of Wilshire and Tuxedo Boulevards at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard: and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to develop five structures with a total of 18 units and a common outlot; and WHEREAS, the site has been guided by the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use as part of the Wilshire -Tuxedo Gateway Mixed Use Area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed to rezone the site to R-3 Multiple Family District; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the major subdivision - preliminary plat subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at its February 2, 2021 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed Villages of Island Park major subdivision -preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission requested additional information from the applicant and tabled consideration of the request until its March 2, 2021 meeting; and WHEREAS, after further consideration at its March 2, 2021 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the major subdivision —preliminary plat request with conditions; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462, the City Council of the City of Mound, after providing proper notice thereof pursuant to state law, held a public hearing on March 23, 2021 on the major subdivision -preliminary plat to receive public testimony; and WHEREAS, the City has considered the proposed project as it might affect public health, safety, or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these considerations; and 15424> WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the request, taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances, and other official controls. WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the major subdivision — preliminary plat application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 462.358; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the major subdivision -preliminary plat, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed major subdivision -preliminary plat is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. 3. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the major subdivision -preliminary plat for Villages of Island Park with the following conditions: 10-foot drainage and utility easements shall be established around the perimeter of the property. 2. Concurrent approval of the rezoning and conditional use permit applications. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolutions(s) with Hennepin County. Applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 6. The MCES SAC charge for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. <(54a3> 7. Sewer and watermain area trunk charges for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat. The current trunk charge for sewer and water, per unit, is $2000.00 each. 8. Sewer connection and water connection fees shall be determined as part of the final plat. The 2021 sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. 9. The park dedication fee amount shall be determined as part of the final plat as provided by City Code Sec. 121.121. 10.A development agreement shall be prepared as part of the final plat process. Adopted by the City Council this 23rd of March, 2021. Attest: Catherine Pausche. Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar :A: RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION APPROVING ORDINANCE NO. 2021--AMENDING THE MOUND OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE PID NUMBER 19-117-23-31-0021 AND PID NUMBER 19-117-23-31-0020 FROM B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the applicant, Inland Development Partners, has submitted a rezoning request to change the zoning designation of PID Numbers 19-117-23-31-0021 and 19-117-23-31-0020 from B-2 General Business District to R-3 Multiple Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the subject site is generally located west of the intersection of Wilshire and Tuxedo Boulevards at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the site has been guided by the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use as part of the Wilshire -Tuxedo Gateway Mixed Use Area; and WHEREAS, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan indicates in the Wilshire -Tuxedo Gateway Mixed Use Area, townhomes are an appropriate use; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested rezoning are contained in the Executive Summary Report for the March 23, 2021 meeting, the Planning Report for the March 2, 2021 Planning Commission meeting and minutes, the Planning Report for the February 2, 2021 Planning Commission meeting and minutes, the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the requested rezoning; and WHEREAS, at its February 2, 2021 and March 2, 2021 meetings, the Planning Commission considered the rezoning request and recommended approval of the request at its March 2, 2021 meeting; and WHEREAS, after providing proper notice thereof pursuant to state law, the City Council of the City of Mound held a public hearing on March 23, 2021, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the rezoning were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the rezoning application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99: and `64i' WHEREAS, after its consideration the City Council found the proposed rezoning to be consistent with the Mound Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota: and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the rezoning to R-3 Multiple Family Residential District, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby adopt Ordinance No. 2021- Ordinance Amending the Mound Official Zoning Map for PID Number 19-117-23-31-0021 and PID Number 19- 117-23-31-0020 from B-2 General Business District to R-3 Multiple -Family Residential District. Adopted by the City Council this 23rd of March, 2021. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar :Ea: CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE -2021 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOUND OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE PID NUMBER 19-117-23-31-0021 AND PID NUMBER 19-117-23-31-0020 FROM B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The City Council of the City of Mound does ordain: Section 1. The Mound Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by changing the zoning district boundaries to reclassify the parcels created from the Villages of Island Park Plat from B-2 General Business District to R-3 Multiple -Family Residential. Section 2. This ordinance becomes effective on the first day following the date of its publication and the recording of the Villages of Island Park final plat with Hennepin County. Passed by the City Council this 23rd day of March, 2021. Mayor Raymond J. Salazar Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Published in the Laker the of 12021. Effective the day of 12021. `6)429' RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TOWNHOUSE USE AND A SHORELAND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) FOR VILLAGES OF ISLAND PARK PLANNING CASE NO. 21-01 WHEREAS, the applicant, Inland Development Partners, has submitted an application for a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for the construction of townhouses and a shoreland planned development area (PDA) as part of the Villages of Island Park plat as described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the subject site is generally located west of the intersection of Wilshire and Tuxedo Boulevards at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard: and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to develop five structures with a total of 18 units and a common outlot; and WHEREAS, the site has been guided by the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use as part of the Wilshire -Tuxedo Gateway Mixed Use Area; and WHEREAS, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Wilshire - Tuxedo Gateway Mixed Use Area is intended to provide flexibility for residential or commercial to occur with residential densities guided to be between 7 and 15 units per acre; and WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed an 18-unit townhome development on approximately 1.26 acres, resulting in a residential density of 14.26 units per acre, which meets the Comprehensive Plan guidance; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound adopted Ordinance No. 2021- to rezone the subject property to R-3 Multiple Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the R-3 District requires a conditional use permit be approved for the use of townhomes to be allowed; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested CUP for a PUD are contained in the Executive Summary Report for the March 23, 2021 meeting, the Planning Report for the March 2, 2021 Planning Commission meeting and minutes, the Planning Report for the February 2, 2021 Planning Commission meeting and minutes, the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the CUP to allow townhomes and for a shoreland planned development area subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the CUP application at its February 2, 2021 and March 2, 2021 meetings and recommended the City Council approve the CUP request with conditions; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, the City Council of the City of Mound, after providing proper notice thereof pursuant to state law, held a public hearing on March 23, 2021 on the CUP to receive public testimony; and WHEREAS, the City has considered the proposed project as it might affect public health, safety, or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these considerations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the request, taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances, and other official controls; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the conditional use permit application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the CUP, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use of the site is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. 3. The proposed development is providing adequate utilities and drainage. 4. The proposed development has sufficiently considered access and traffic. 5. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. 6. The proposed project will diversify the types of housing available in the community by providing 18 new townhouse units for the City. "41 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, based on record of this matter and findings contained herein, does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow townhomes and a Shoreland Planned Development Area for Villages of Island Park with the following conditions: 1. The building materials and color scheme shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City. 2. The site plan shall be revised and approved by the Fire Department to eliminate the turning radius issue for a 78-foot ladder truck. 3. No parking shall be allowed on either of the access roads to the development. 4. The lease/rental agreement shall not allow for the overnight parking and/or storage of recreational vehicles or trailers. 5. The grading plan shall be revised to regrade along Wilshire Boulevard to establish a proper drainage ditch under the proposed driveway access. 6. The landscape plan shall be revised to show Black Hills Spruce under "Evergreen Trees" rather than "Ornamental' and add Techny Arborvitae to "Evergreen Trees" rather than "Shrubs." 7. Concurrent approval of the rezoning and major subdivision -preliminary plat applications. 8. This conditional use permit is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: (-to be inserted-) 9. A Development Agreement, to be prepared by the City Attorney, shall be required for the project and prepared as part of the final plat. 10.Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the conditional use permit application. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for securing all required local, state, and federal permits and approvals. 12. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Adopted by the City Council this 231d of March 2021. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar "0 4, VILLAGES OF ISLAND PARK SITE PUN - 3.15.2021 m `15N, \ / / LE3AL OESCAPIION O D �e \i -- sBLOCE a \ aLoa 1 i CUTLOTA OO N eie, I --- 7 -- 0 I I � III I� o S I ___ III III III z r o OII m 1 _ .III — — — — —i— as sz z22< W ,zzso N29'22 2-E sa a I` }e s .. s . ® El LEGEND,— LoT LINE imwwEUT 14mMMhtl$alw. Call balm ymaq. v ow 811 a ALLIANT MMm M rm 9 b IM7 Nr MIL MN YM@ 8S9Y xxwwlIIII�MlFIcvwn Y d O aZ Q J J N 6 0 Q W z o J Q QUA— —UIUNCE/C0NTxo7 01a. 3/18/2021 Land Use and Subdivision Requests for Villages of Island Park CITY COUNCIL -MARCH 2S, 2D21 1 Overview ro • mlaod Development Partners is requesting multple land use and subdivision approvals • Project would Involve the construction of 18 townhouse units • Each unit l ndlviduelly treated 3 Public Fearing Rezoning Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Conditional Use Permit (CUP) fortownhoures and a Residential Sborelana Planned oevelopmem Area Review, discussion and consideration of site developrnPM plans 5 2 4 9 Overview Prq,A1 willlnvalve tetwo llb-beam.. w httw.-m ...CA ga A wulhu—nerar Comprehensive Plan 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides site Its Mixed Use tl e m R ex..tentl a luxe. In, IRA area ax antl re drni loan tling t.wnb..ez a nd mint a.IN nnr¢In tm. c..Rams ] t.15 P lno—A-wmm w.nitl ne et. 1e nn ttz `(M, 3/18/2021 M 11 Preliminary Plat Sit, is 1.26 Acres parcel ogether creates individual lots for each building a no than an outlet for common areas Rod ondindand that drainage and up If, basements be Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required for townhouses Tool for the development of a Residential Shoreland Planned Savelopment Area PDA intended to prwme flexibility to supper, redevelopment Intent for prqecv to establish dimension and design standards Proposed Dimension and Design Standards Unit give, u. See ,nareeit nn htl r prepivea el roe .warefeet uni 5mn ogre p,,p,,ea t, deop,n 1 6o ltl'ng xe get negntwlme renmrea m be under 35 feet metase- Rezoning ,- •correrRly zoned 9-2 General !y^? [ Oil qgs au:ina,, :inn I'. s a - N mulepleiaml ae�tlential P an a esignmon el Mixed use YC-- a Site Plan`"-" • SRe Size-1.26acre site meets size for PDA • Setbacks —see plan • Utilitiesalready established forme site To . b0 10 12 Proposed Dimension and Design Standards - - •Rrmewaysfromwilsnire - anoleast Poulevard • v units sell I have testcarfl garage • ADA unit wdl have an oversized one-cargarage f • In u nparl<ng mal a'mg 1ADA - —.wloadMo 16w, 2 3/18/2021 Proposed Dimension and Design Standards o bed smrmwmer Propoe Ng 507% unparvoije surche d be conad udtonstrickf irtmg MCWC currently rev ewing re osed ma — applicant will need to meet their requirements ,ticu gang" r 13 Staff/Consultant/Agency/Utility Review Hennepin County Transportation —requertetl lotmt tlramage antl unity ie�antl,,,, me r a n tl T h e it me t o pi r in re q ue rte tl to bg r, it along duck" r en6 ou lrvard to ertabl66 a proper drainage tlltrh antler the nice oeetl arreee. The id, my will be v—luadng How Ptuand add,,n,l tr,,hnentm,y be neetleJ f flow are, annot m,ren eamng MCW O—mntinuexto be antler rb,,,r May neetl to all a ooiume mn[ml meaxme wnlm xnmuIT be ahleto bea rr ommotlated on the it, In the open xeare Mound Fire Department and Mal— no preliminary bantling Ixxuex Itl 2fidd Uyout enerallyfawabie Did rcmcd, antl ape land a —dy m,d,f,,d W rmng atllu, on Inremal turn m allow, Cr food Iadd,rtruck 15 PC Review and Recommendation Held public bearing on February 2, 2021 Considered requests at February 2, 2021 and March 2, 2021 meetings Discussion included traffic, site access, parking, recoup, recreational facilities, sidewalk/trail connectlons, and stormwater Unanimous recommendation of approval for all requests 17 14 IF Proposed Dimension and Design Standards tana,tapma— Proposing493%ofsite to remain open Retiring trees on west's side ofside 22 oversrory and to ornamental toces Variety of snrubg gasses and perennials across the site —'- Public Comment Public Hearing Notice Mailed notice to all properties In the project area orwlmin 350 hat Mailed notice to Lakewlnds and Pelican Point Boards/HOoks Posted on cmweb9re Published in the Laker �" \ Recommendation 1. Hold the public bearing for all l and us, and subdivision requests 2. Cons der the protect sped!¢ requests Rezoning Meorsubdivlenniirellminary plat Conditional Use Permit fortmvnhouses and shorelantl planned tlevelopmentarea M TUXEDO BOULEVARD TIM s` °°E"tCE't The Cl of �. Moun o 1 i� w AM, ,iu%(,U � �D rnxx. ,� ,a.nevmrvwrmxm�nx AffIX].11Eq IiW NIUpIS JIL PIN0.A.fIJIA\' Vp1gGF50F 6LAN� PMK MOIAI�,MN MINUTES (DRAFT EXCERPTS) MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 2, 2021 Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: David Goode, Jason Baker, Jon Ciatti, Samantha Erickson, Jason Holt, Kevin Castellano Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Consultant Rita Trapp and Secretary Jen Holmquist. Members of the public: Steve Schwanke, 100 Lake Street West, Wayzata, August Bruggeman, 100 Lake Street West, Wayzata, T. Cody Turnquist, 2000 Chestnut Road, Hamel, Clark Wicklund, 733 Marquette, Mpls, Paul and Cindy Folm, 2998 Pelican Pt. Circle, Aaron Wacker, 4704 Cavan Rd., Rodney Beystrom, 4466 Denbigh Rd. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Baker amend the meeting agenda to include the memo distributed by staff that includes additional information for agenda item number 5, seconded by Castellano. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Baker to approve the meeting agenda, as amended, seconded by Castellano. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF FEBRUARY 2, 2021 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Baker to approve the meeting minutes from February 2, 2021, as written, seconded by Ciatti. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Public Hearing for major -subdivision -preliminary plat of "Villages of Island Park" for property at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard; also review of rezoning and conditional use permit for townhomes and for a planned development area in the shoreland overlay district (tabled from February 2, 2021 meeting) Applicants: Steve Schwanke of Inland Development Partners, LLC and Turnquist Properties Inc. Trapp outlined the role of the Planning Commission and described how this case will be addressed at this meeting. She summarized the project using her previous presentation. Trapp described the subject area. The project would involve the construction of 18 townhome units. The preliminary plat is being proposed and requested to organize the lots. The plat will initially combine the existing 2 lots, then create individual lots for each building and one outlot which will become the common areas of the development. The second request is to rezone the property. Current zoning is B-2 general business district and multi -family is not allowed under the current zoning district. The proposal is to rezone the area to R-3 multiple family residential. This is consistent with the 2040 plan. The final request is for a Conditional Use Permit which is required for the townhouses and to allow for the residential shoreland planned development area (PDA). A PDA is intended to provide flexibility in establishing the development. Trapp addressed the comments regarding connectivity for pedestrian and bike traffic. She stated this is a city issue and not an individual property owner issue. Trapp pointed out that there is a sidewalk on Tuxedo and a shoulder on Wilshire. There is also an off-street trail located west of the site on the north side of the road. This means that it is unlikely that a new sidewalk or trail would be installed on the south side of Wilshire in the vicinity of this development. Trapp noted that there is a limit on what the city can do due to limited right-of- way area throughout the community. Trapp also noted that at times the community doesn't have a shared vision. Staff stated that there were two recent cases where the city proposed new sidewalks but the residents in those areas didn't want it. The applicant will maintain and not impact the existing sidewalk but this property owner has no way to improve neighborhood current conditions. Trapp said that the recommendations being sought are all dependent on each other and can be recommended with one motion. Goode asks for questions. Hearing none he outlined the new information the applicants have provided. He invited the applicant to begin their presentation. Steve Schwanke, Inland Development 100 Lake Street West. He introduced his team; August Bruggeman, T. Cody Turnquist, and Clark Wicklund. Wicklund outlined the trails and connectivity question. He noted there is a trail from the property, connecting to the sidewalk on Tuxedo. To address the concerns about parking, they have added 3 additional visitor parking spaces. Regarding storm water, the applicant met with MCWD, and they understand the expectations. The project will include a small rain garden adjacent to Wilshire to filter storm water before discharging to the storm sewer on Wilshire. Wicklund commented on traffic. He believed PM trips will likely arrive via Tuxedo with AM trips traveling on Wilshire. He noted that they visited the site on the morning of this meeting during AM peak morning traffic and they witnessed wait times were 0-5 seconds. They didn't witness anyone waiting on Tuxedo or Wilshire. In regards to the access locations he believes this optimized the distance between the adjacent roadways and those access points. Wicklund pointed out that they presented Hennepin County with the option for both accesses to be on Wilshire (as was suggested by public comment). The county replied with a number of concerns with this proposal, including the proximity to other roadways being too close and the distance between access points would be below required distance of 660 feet. Applicant also discussed with Hennepin County the traffic in this area, specifically looking for instances of collisions. There were 3 property damage crashes in the last 10 years, per MN -DOT crash reports. Atypical intersection has 4 in the same period. Generally, 10 incidents are needed for the county to consider improvement. In the county's opinion there is a very limited amount of traffic collisions at the location. Wicklund shares a broad statement about the traffic that the prior use (or future, if the site were to be developed commercially) would be far higher traffic use. Goode asks for questions. Schwanke referenced some concerns they heard from the public comments at the previous meeting. He noted a lease agreement would aggressively regulate onsite parking. With the addition of 3 stalls, he noted there are plenty. Also included in the agreement is that they will not allow recreational vehicle parking on the property and parking in the drive isle will not be allowed. Schwanke addresses the concerns regarding the lack of recreational facilities on site. He noted there are 7 public recreational parks within 0.8 miles of the project site. The applicant has added a passive nature trail on the southern end of the property which will include pollinator plants and will activate the area for residents to get outside and quietly enjoy nature. He recalled the fire chief comments. They made changes to the plan in relation to that comment. He addressed the 18 units. He stated they explored a higher density but they found it wasn't feasible. They do not wish to reduce the amount of units below 18 for profitability of the site. Goode asked about the public concerns regarding overflow parking onto other properties. Schwanke says the parking on site is sufficient for the residents. In his experience, the amount :• of visitor parking being proposed is enough. Goode asked if the applicant considered restricting renting to people 55 years or older. Schwanke stated the applicant is not interested in restricting the property by age. He states while other properties do have many 55+ renters, approximately 75% of their renters in a similar sized and type of project are the aging millennials. He noted that there is a background check and a credit check in order to rent a unit. In the applicant's experience, aging millennials are good renters with disposable income who want to rent a place with no upstairs or downstairs neighbors, where they can have some privacy and want the high end interior finishes this project provides. Erickson thanked the applicant for the responses. She stated that her level of concern is lessened after hearing the information they came back with. Goode asked for any additional comments. Hearing none, he invites members of the public to make comment Aaron Wacker- 4704 Cavan Road. He noted it's a dangerous corner. He believes that signage will most likely be needed for no left turn. Smith reminded that those roads are county as well as local and any traffic, or signage changes will need to be in cooperation with the county. Rodney Beystrom - 4466 Denbigh Road. He asked the applicant where the buffer between the property line and the back of the building on the adjacent property is. Turnquist replied that the property line is about one foot off the back of the building. The plan is to grow tall trees to create a "screen" between the properties. Beystrom noted there is no driveway for the units. He asks where someone would park returning with groceries. Schwanke stated that the resident would pull into their garage and remove their groceries. Beystrom doesn't believe garbage cans could be stored in the garages. He believes the visitor parking is inconvenient. He thinks the design is flawed and too small. Goode asks for any more comments. Hearing none he opens discussion between the commissioners. Holt asked the applicant how garbage receptacles are stored at the other properties they referenced earlier. Schwanke replied that you have to store the carts in the garage; admitting it's not roomy but it is sufficient. Holt asked the applicant to address the Section 8 concerns from the public comments. Schwanke explained this is a market rate project; they are not required to enroll in those programs. He explicitly stated there will be no tax credit units and no Section 8 units. Holt thanked them for the three additional parking spaces. He asked if there is any room for more or if it's maxed out. Schwanke believes there may be room for one more. He noted that extra spaces increase the hardcover and that reflects on stormwater. Holt wondered if they could limit on street parking as part of the rental agreement. Schwanke said they will look into adding that language. Erickson asked if they will regulate the visitor parking and/or allow overnight parking. Schwanke says overnight parkers need to register in advance. Castellano asked about CUP requirements from page 21 in the agenda packet. Trapp stated that the fire truck concern in #2 has already been addressed and item #4, to regrade along Wilshire will be addressed when the property is graded. Goode asked for additional comments or questions. Hearing none he outlined the Planning Commission options. MOTION by Baker to recommend City Council approval of the rezoning from B-2 General Business District to R-3 Multiple -Family Residential, subject to conditions and findings of fact included in the staff report, approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a townhouse use and a shoreland planned development area, subject to conditions and findings of fact included in the staff report, and approval of the preliminary plat, as submitted, subject to conditions and findings of fact included in the staff report; seconded by Erickson. MOTION carried unanimously. :: 22415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952)472-0604 Staff Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: March 2, 2021 Re: March 2, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Item No. 3 Approval of the Agenda with any Amendments -- New/Additional Information for Agenda Item No. 5 for Proposed Villages of Island Park Project Request As provided under Agenda Item No. 3 (Approval of the Agenda, with any Amendments), Staff respectfully recommends the March 2, 2021 meeting agenda be amended to add new/additional information for Item No. 5 to include an additional comment received February 26, 2021 for the proposed Villages of Island Park redevelopment project: Rodney Beystrom, 4466 Denbigh Road Sarah, I might be moving away from the neighborhood in a year or two when I potentially sell my house as a part of my retirement now but renting to 55 yrs. and older would be better and widely accepted by everyone including folks I think at Pelican Pt. The design I think is flawed though because there is NOT enough room to park on any kind of a limited driveway whatsoever. You come home with groceries or other supplies and you have to go into an opened garage or you'll be sticking out into the street; you won't even have room for a garbage container inside your garage or room for other storage articles or tools it seems and guests would not be able to park at your unit and limited parking elsewhere for them also. So when there is inclement weather conditions it would be quite inconvenient for guests especially if they are bringing things over. Just a bad design for basic convenience. I don't think people will be happy once they realize this. Also not a great place for kids or children which is why a 55+ cliental provision would really be the way to go and make everyone happy and they wouldn't have trouble finding folks in that category. But they need to make room for at least minimal parking in the driveway. Look at the townhouses behind the Jubilee Food market in downtown Mound and the Harbor Liquor store. They at least can park in their driveway with just enough room for a car and guests and to unload groceries more conveniently. New/Additional Information Staff Memorandum dated March 2, 2021 Page 33A i PLANNING REPORT ADDENDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: February 25, 2021 SUBJECT: Village of Island Park Development (Case No. 21-01) Consideration of tabled itemsfrom February 2, 2021 Planning Commission meeting which includes the Major- Subdivision - Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and Conditional Use Permit for Townhouses and a Residential Shoreland Planned Development Area APPLICANT: Steve Schwanke, Inland Development Partners OWNER: Tummist Properties TLC LOCATION: 4451 Wilshire Boulevard (PID No. 19-117 23-31-0021 & 19-117 23-31-0020) MEETING DATE: March 2, 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed Use ZONING: B-2 General Business District The Planning Report and supporting information previously Included in the agenda packet for the February 2, 2021 Planning Commission meeting are not included with the Planning Report Addendum. Members may request an electronic copy of the report and support materials related to this request included in the February 2, 2021 be forwarded by email. OVERVIEW At its February 2, 2021 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered multiple land use and subdivision applications for the redevelopment of a property located at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard. At that meeting the Planning Commission tabled consideration of the requests to its March 2, 2021 meeting and requested the applicant provide additional information density, traffic, parking, and circulation. Planning Commissioners should note that the public hearing for the major subdivision preliminary plat was closed at the February 2, 2021 meeting. Thus, the Planning Commission has discretion as to whether additional comments will be received. ma PUBLIC COMMENT RECIEVED The following are additional comments received since the February 2, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting: Rodney Beystrom - 4466 Denbigh Road Greetings All: I was at the Planning Commission Meeting tonight and spoke. I wanted to add another comment for your consideration and/or research with the owners/developers. The concerns with traffic and parking and space considerations and sidewalks and safety per se' was very justified and appropriate. In speaking with others later ---- many which did not speak ---- it seems that one solution would be to make this rental development (if it is to remain rental and not owner occupied condos or villa's) a complex to rent to those 55+ and older. This would solve many issues raised such as play areas for children and other similar concerns. Right now the Pelican Point Townhouses directly across the street are very much against this being a typical rental complex as are most of the people in my neighborhood. However, most of us would be much more open to support it once the concerns are addressed and then if it were to be a 55 yrs. of age +plus rental complex. Seniors are an entirely different group which are law abiding, more low key, not party animals, no crime, less active, shop and do things locally and bank locally enhancing the business climate here, etc. Most people in the neighborhoods in this area would be greatly relieved to hear it would be for people 55+ and over. There is a great rental market for those folks as the project in Tonka Bay's marketing analysis showed them. If that happened, that Auto Repair place next door could be bought and gutted out and made into a coffee shop/donut place and with all the 55+ folks at Pelican Point, the new Island Park Villages behind them, and the Lakewinds condo's 1/2 block away PLUS all the people driving off the other parts of the Island down Wilshire and Tuxedo in the mornings, etc. a coffee/donut shop in that building would be a gold mine. The building would not have to come down ---plenty of parking ---- just gutted out and rehabbed. Something to suggest and have consideration given to. I don't think there would be any opposition to a 55+ rental complex there as opposed to just a typical general populace rental. Pelican Point is I believe all 55+ plus owner occupied units and it would fit in with them nicely. I hope these points will enter your discussions. Dave and Barb Henderson — 3018 Pelican Point Circle Dear Mound Planning Commission Members, I attended the public hearing last night and want to thank you for carefully considering all aspects of the proposed Village of Island Park project. The presentation provided me with a great deal more information on the project. However, I am afraid that my concerns with the project have actually increased as it does not seem prudent to build 18 units on this site. I have summarized my primary concerns in the attached memorandum. Thanks for your consideration. To: City of Mound Planning Commission Members From: Dave & Barb Henderson Re: Village of Island Park Proposed Development Date: February 3, 2021 I want to thank you for listening last night to the concerns of the residents near the proposed Village of Island Park development. Our primary concerns relate to the high i° number of units being proposed and the fact that they are rental units. We believe that these two factors will contribute to increased safety issues near the site and logistical problems for nearby residents due to the lack of parking and interior driveway area for the residents. Looking at the renderings of the site it is hard to believe that there is 50% green space with the project. Project Density - During their presentation last night, city staff indicated that on a small site such as this city guideline would suggest 8-18 units on the site. Presumably the higher number is relevant when there are no issues with the site and the lower number appropriate when dealing with site concerns. Given the location so close to a dangerous Y intersection at Tuxedo and Wilshire, it would seem that something closer to the lower number would be more appropriate than the maximum number allowed. Density is partially being justified on the basis that this development is better than the previous use as a failed supper club with 77 parking spaces when it closed 40 years ago. While that is true, I don't think that is a relevant factor in assessing a project today. The 17 ft. setback on Tuxedo and 18 ft. on Wilshire is being justified by the fact that the old Skelly station has similar setbacks. That gas station was built long ago and would never be approved today with those setbacks on that dangerous intersection. The proposed project looks jammed into the site. Rental Units - This development is in a residential area with very few rental units. It was suggested that some of the units at Lakewinds are rented out by their owners, but the proposed development is a much different situation from that. Lakewinds is a condo project with most of the units occupied by owners who insure that property values are maintained and association rules are enforced. Renters by nature are transient and as a result make the safety issues with this site even more pronounced. Also, as pointed out last night, property values for nearby residents are adversely affected when they are in proximity to rental units. Traffic and Safety - It was stated that traffic on Tuxedo and Wilshire would increase by less than 5% due to the proposed development. However, that is not the most important factor in evaluating this project from a traffic and safety perspective. The problem is that the ingress and egress for the project are very close to a very busy Y intersection where people are driving fast and frequently don't signal turns at the Y. There is also a large hill on Tuxedo which limits visibility. Many of the cars traveling on Tuxedo in the summer are driven by people going to and from Al & Alma's and are therefore unfamiliar with the area. Add the significant number of pedestrian and bikers using Tuxedo and Wilshire and you have a very dangerous situation for both cars and pedestrians. Lack of Parking and Interior Driveway Space - The limited parking being proposed for the development is likely to cause issues for the adjacent neighborhoods. Street parking on Tuxedo and Wilshire is not advisable given the high traffic volume and narrow roads. It would be easy to imagine overflow parking ending up in Pelican Point or the adjacent neighborhoods off Wilshire. Outside parking is tightly controlled and discouraged for the residents of Pelican Point by our Association bylaws. We do not want to have parking and safety issues with non-residents of Pelican Point. Since there is no place to put snow removed from the development, it is likely to end up on either Pelican Point property on Tuxedo or private homes on Wilshire. If that happens, snow piles on Tuxedo and Wilshire would make the visibility problems entering and exiting Tuxedo for Pelican Point residents even more dangerous. We appreciate the Planning Commission considering all of these issues before making its recommendation to the City Council. However, it seems unlikely that these issues and concerns can be adequately resolved unless the number of units is significantly reduced and/or the units are to be sold rather than rented. Thanks for your consideration. Ralph Kempf —4363 Wilshire Boulevard Greetings Ms Smith, My name is Ralph Kempf. I spoke briefly on behalf of Lakewinds at the Mound Planning Commission public hearing for the "Villages of Island Park" application. The two issues I addressed were parking and traffic safety on Tuxedo Boulevard. As you recall, I have first hand deep experience with both Lakewinds and Village by the Bay in Mound. I can attest to the ongoing and forever issues that City approval of inadequate parking has created for both The Village By the Bay in Mound and for Lakewinds. I expressed concern for the same mistake being made again at the Villages of Island Park. The same concern was echoed by Planning Commission members and other members of the public. The reason that this is of particular importance to Lakewinds is that when the unassigned and guest parking at this new development fills up, and with limited off -site parking options, the default will, without any doubt, be to for residents to send guests to the big parking lot just across the street at Lakewinds. The parking problem created at this new development will make Lakewinds' already severe parking challenges that much worse. This scenario is not what could happen. It is what will absolutely happen without additional on -site parking at Villages of Island Park. Their problem will become our problem. To re -cap the traffic safety issue: As you know, the Y intersection of Wilshire and Tuxedo is a difficult traffic issue already. The Tuxedo Boulevard side empties Island Park, Shady Island and Enchanted Island and has 1/3 more traffic than the Wilshire side. This proposal adds another driveway between the two existing driveways for Pelican Point and Lakewinds, and very close to the near -blind curve on the Tuxedo — Wilshire side. I would urge the City of Mound to consider a U- shaped traffic plan for this application, with both exits on the Wilshire side, where traffic is substantially less and travels more slowly. Please share these concerns with the Mound PC, Council, other city staff members and other interested parties. We thank the Planning Commission for their attention and consideration they have shown for these difficult issues. Thank you. 15rl> Jann Olsten - 3028 Pelican Point Circle Dear Planning Commission members, Thanks for the opportunity to speak at last night's hearing. Attached is a memo summarizing my thoughts on behalf of the Pelican Point Homeowners Association. MEMORANDUM To: Planning Commission Members, City of Mound Cc: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director From: Pelican Point Homeowners Association Re: Village of Island Park— Proposed Development Date: February 3, 2021 Thank you for the opportunity to appear at last night's hearing to express our homeowners' concerns about the proposed development. Much was discussed, and we understand the Planning Commission has tabled a vote on the proposal pending further consideration of several issues raised during the meeting. Dave and Barb Henderson, residents of Pelican Point, sent you a memo today describing several concerns, which are shared by all of us at Pelican Point. I won't repeat those here; rather, I'll summarize what I think are the needed solutions. 1. Reduce density. You heard from several individuals about lack of adequate parking, a shortage of green space for children and pets, challenging access for emergency vehicles and service trucks, and little consideration given for pedestrians currently walking along both Tuxedo and Wilshire boulevards. The one solution that addresses all of these is fewer units. 2. Own, not rent. There is much to like about the project. The garages and balconies face inward, not towards the streets; the units themselves are attractive; and, the proposed unit buildouts (as described by the developer) seem targeted to a demographic that would fit the area. However, for the reasons described in the Henderson memo, rental property is inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood. The units should be privately owned, not rented. 3. Eliminate Tuxedo Boulevard entrance. As you will see when visiting the site, exiting the development onto Tuxedo Boulevard would be quite dangerous, given the amount of traffic coming from each direction and, most importantly, the lack of adequate site lines to the south. Since the property lies below and only a short distance from the crest of the hill, it's almost impossible to see oncoming traffic. Leaving the property, making a left hand turn onto Tuxedo across oncoming traffic from both directions, while also looking out for pedestrians, should not be allowed. It is much too dangerous, and this entrance should be eliminated. As one commissioner mentioned, this development should not be expected to cure existing traffic problems. However, this development should not ignore those issues either. Rather, the City should take these concerns into consideration and minimize additional risks as much as possible. i Reduce the density, sell homes not rent, and eliminate the Tuxedo entrance. These changes will address most concerns raised by the public at last night's hearing and will help insure an addition to our neighborhood that is both attractive and safe. Thanks for listening, and for the work you do on behalf of Mound. Tom Skramstad — 2968 Pelican Point Circle Good morning to the members of the Mound Planning Commission, First of all, thank you for your service to our community! I am Tom Skramstad. My wife and I live at 2968 Pelican Point Circle, across the street from the proposed Village of Island Park project. My wife and I attended the public hearing meeting last night. As a former Planning Commissioner (in Shorewood) I recognize that often the people who come to public hearings are there to voice their displeasure with any change to their neighborhood. (The "not -in -my - backyard" syndrome.) Last night was no exception. Some people even complained about matters that have nothing to do with the Village project; e.g. no sidewalks on Wilshire Boulevard. I am going offer a different perspective; one that is in support of the proposed development. First of all I would say that the developers have done a very good job of finding an appropriate new use for the vacant property. They have touched all the bases, seemingly, regarding city code, the city comprehensive plan, traffic, greenspace, etc. in proposing an attractive set of townhomes. I would also give a lot of credit to the city's team for reviewing the plan with the police department, the fire department, the watershed district, traffic experts, etc. It seems like there are a few questions to be answered, but so far no major issue has been identified that would stand in the way of approval of this project. We think proposed Village project is attractive and well designed. That intersection has heavy traffic at certain times of day but the increase in traffic from this project will be so small as to be unnoticeable. We hope that the project will proceed to gain all necessary approvals and will be an attractive addition to our neighborhood and the city. Thank you. APPLICANT SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION In an effort to provide the Planning Commission information to support its consideration of the land use and subdivision requests, the applicant has prepared the attached narrative and supplemental exhibits which address the following issues identified at the February 2, 2021 meeting: • Traffic Volume • Traffic Site/Access • Traffic Distribution • Parks/Recreational Facilities • Stormwater/Hard Surface • Density • Rental Housing I • Property Ownership/Management • Fire Chief/Marshal • On-Site/Surface Parking STAFF SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION At the February Planning Commission concerns were raised by community members about the lack of off-street pedestrian connectivity in this area. Staff notes that there is an on -street shoulder on Wilshire and a sidewalk on Tuxedo that serves this property. Given that there is a portion of an off-street trail on the north side of Wilshire 400 feet to the west of this property, there should be no expectation that this property would provide a trail on Wilshire as it would be on the wrong side of the roadway and be a disconnected segment. In considering non -motorized connectivity, Planning Commissioners are also requested to take into consideration historical context and community direction. As described in the Comprehensive Plan, the historical development pattern of narrow streets/right-of-way continues to limit the ability of the community to provide a significant off-street pedestrian and bicycle network. In addition, Staff notes as information that during two recent public transportation improvement projects the City was told not to install trails/sidewalks by the neighboring residents even though the traffic conditions were similar. EXTENSION OF TIMELINE FOR REVIEW Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days unless an extension for review is requested. The 60-day timeline currently expires on or around March 1, 2021. The City of Mound on February 25, 2021, executed 60-day extensions for action on the submitted land use applications for the project. With the extension the current deadline for action on the land use application for the proposed Village of Island Park project is on or around April 29, 2021. This deadline also is the 120-day timeframe for the major subdivision -preliminary plat request. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff's recommendation for the major subdivision -preliminary plat, rezoning and conditional use permit is provided below. Please note that the conditions proposed are preliminary and subject to change as review and discussion of the development project continues. Rezoning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the rezoning from B-2 General Business District to R-3 Multiple -Family Residential. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Mound 2040 Comprehensive Plan. & Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a townhouse use and a shoreland planned development area with the following conditions: 1. The building materials and color scheme shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City. 2. The site plan shall be revised and approved by the Fire Department to eliminate the turning radius issue for a 78-foot ladder truck. 3. No parking shall be allowed on either of the access roads to the development. 4. The grading plan shall be revised to regrade along Wilshire Boulevard to establish a proper drainage ditch under the proposed driveway access. 5. The landscape plan shall be revised to show Black Hills Spruce under "Evergreen Trees" rather than "Ornamental" and add Techny Arborvitae to "Evergreen Trees" rather than "Shrubs." 6. Concurrent approval of the rezoning and major subdivision -preliminary plat applications. 7. This conditional use permit is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: (to be inserted). 8. A Development Agreement, to be prepared by the City Attorney, shall be required for the project and prepared as part of the final plat. 9. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the conditional use permit application. 10. The applicant shall be responsible for securing all required local, state, and federal permits and approvals. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 12. Additional conditions from Staff, the Planning Commission, and City Council. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use of the site is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. 01"A 3. The proposed development is providing adequate utilities and drainage. 4. The proposed development has sufficiently considered access and traffic. 5. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. 6. The proposed project will diversify the types of housing available in the community by providing 18 new townhouse units for the City. Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the preliminary plat, as submitted, with the following conditions: 1. 10-foot drainage and utility easements shall be established around the perimeter of the property. 2. Concurrent approval of the rezoning and conditional use permit applications. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolutions(s) with Hennepin County. Applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 6. The MCES SAC charge for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 7. Sewer and watermain area trunk charges for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat. The current trunk charge for sewer and water, per unit, is $2000.00 each. 8. Sewer connection and water connection fees shall be determined as part of the final plat. The 2020 sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. 9. The park dedication fee amount shall be determined as part of the final plat as provided by City Code Sec. 121.121. 10. A development agreement shall be prepared as part of the final plat process. 11. Additional conditions from Staff, the Planning Commission and City Council. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed major subdivision -preliminary plat is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. 3. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Consideration of these land use and subdivision requests by the City Council will be set once a Planning Commission recommendation has been received. Public hearings are required for the major subdivision/preliminary plat, the rezoning, and the conditional use permit. 1 0000 / 0 I P Inland Development Partners February 25, 2021 David Goode, Chair, and City of Mound Planning Commissioners 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: VILLAGES OF ISLAND PARK Dear Chairman Goode and Commissioners, Below is a summary of neighborhood comments articulated during the public hearing at the February 2, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. For purposes of brevity, I have consolidated these comments followed by our response. Attached also are exhibits highlighting some of the following comments. Traffic Volume The proposed 18 units will generate approximately 132 trips daily. This volume of traffic will increase traffc on Wilshire Boulevard by about 2.8%and about 1.9%on Tuxedo Boulevard. In comparison, a retail/restaurant/commercial use currently permitted by code would likely generate approximately 560 daily trips. Current and projected traffic volumes on Wilshire and Tuxedo are below roadway design standards and crash incidence is below area averages. Further, there have been no pedestrian - involved accidents in the Tuxedo and Wilshire area. Please refer to Exhibits 1 through 2B. Traffic/Site Access We evaluated, with our traffc and civil engineers, the possibility of shifting the Tuxedo access to Wilshire. Wilshire is a County Road and in conversations with Hennepin County representatives, a second Wilshire access point is considered very unlikelyto receive approval for two primary reasons: 1. Access points are in close proximity to each other and to other adjacent roadways; and 2. Proximity of the new proposed Wilshire access point is too close to the Wilshire and Tuxedo intersection. Please referto Exhibits 1 through 2B. 100 LakeSt,,, t West, S.,te 200 I W,,ynta, MN 55391 I Inlanddp.mn. 1952-495-6240 V I OI Traffic Distribution Traffic use of any roadway system is based on where people want to travel and time of day. Based on location of regional and local employment and retail centers, it is anticipated Wilshire will be accessed most frequently in the morning and Tuxedo will be most frequently accessed in the afternoon and evening. Please refer to the attached memorandum from Clark Wicklund of Alliant Engineering for further information and detail. Please refer to Exhibits 1 through 2B. Lack of Parks/Recreational Facilities There are seven (7) recreational facilities/parks within one mile of the proposed 18-unit development. Further, a passive outdoor amenity is added to the proposed development for use by our residents. Additional greenspace exists for on -site recreation as well. Please refer to Exhibits 3-4, Stormwater/Hard Surface A stormwater permit is required from the watershed district. We continue to work with the watershed district to define the stormwater solution using best management practices. It is anticipated that some form of raingarden/infiltration system will be implemented, again using best management practices. Sufficient area exists to accommodate such a system. The project hard surface is less than the hard surface coverage of historic uses. Density We have examined a number of alternative site plans and have determined that eighteen units is the lowest number of units possible for this development. This minimum number of units is necessary to ensure property management activities and staff can be adequately funded. Fewer than eighteen units greatly compromises the professional and high -quality nature of the project. Rental Housing The property will be a market rate home product that will attract two primary market niches: 1. Renters 55+ who wish to shed the responsibilities of homeownership while adding flexibility to their lifestyle. 2. Aging millennials who for a variety of reasons do not desire to live in an owner -occupied home. Both renter types, however, want to live in upscale rental housing and have the financial resources to pay for such amenities. This project will not be enrolled in the County Section 8 program or any other affordable housing program. The proposed development is and will remain market rate housing. 100 LakeStreet West, Suite 200 1 Wayzata, MN 55391 1 inlanddp.com � 952-495-6240 <R59/ka> Property Ownership/Management Inland Development Partners is lead property owner and manager. All other investors are local residents and include members of the Turnquist family, current owners of the subject property. Fire Chief/Marshal The site plan has been amended to accommodate comments made by the Fire Chief/Marshal. On-Site/Surface Parking Three additional stalls have been added in response to public comments. Please refer to Exhibit 1. Recreational Vehicles No recreational vehicles will be allowed on the property, nor will parking be allowed in the drive aisle per our lease agreement. The Development Team is excited to bring to Mound a much needed and in -demand housing option. We look forward to our continued discussion at the March Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely, Steve Schwanke Partner Attachment 100 Lake Sheet West, Suite 200 1 Wayzata, MN55391 1 InlauddryroVm 1 952-495-6240 t> 46 ALLIANT Memorandum TO: T. Cody Tumquist & Steve Schwanke FROM: Clark Wicklund, PE DATE: February 17, 2021 SUBJECT: Villages of Island Park— Traffic and Site Access Analysis As requested, Alliant Engineering, Inc. is providing supplemental information to the February 2, 2021 City of Mound Planning Commission meeting relative to traffic and site access. Traffic The proposed 18 unit townhome project will generate approximately 132 average daily trips (ADT) of which 10% or 13 trips can be anticipated in the AM and PM peak hours. Average daily traffic for Wilshire Boulevard, Tuxedo Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard north of Wilshire is 2,350 ADT, 3,350 ALL and 5,500 ADT, respectively. This will result in an increase in traffic of 2.8% for Wilshire Boulevard, 1.9% for Tuxedo Boulevard and 2.4% for Tuxedo Boulevard north of Wilshire. Prior to demolition, the historic 5,000 square foot restaurant generated approximately 561 average daily trips which are no longer on area roads. The current application will result in a reduction of 429 average daily trips when compared to the historic land use. The intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard has experienced 3 property damage only (PDO) type crashes since 2010 and no crashes with an injury reported. Two of the three crashes were weather/snow related and all three occurred in either January or February. The state average for an urban thru/stop intersection is 4 crashes in a 10 year period. Similar intersections may experience as many as 10 PLO type crashes in a 10 year period before improvements are warranted. Site Access The City of Mound Subdivision Ordinance and National Fire Code require two means of ingress and egress for emergency response. Access to multiple roadways is preferred for driver flexibility when needed and maintenance of area roadways. A second access to Wilshire Boulevard was discussed with a Hennepin County representative. The following concerns were expressed and are considered to prohibit a second access point: • Limited sight distance less than 100 feet to north towards Cardiff during AM peak traffic. County requires a minimum of 300 feet for Wilshire Boulevard. • Proximity to currently proposed access and resulting separation of approximately 160 feet. County requires minimum access spacing of 660 feet. 733 Marquette Ave Ste 700 612758.3080 MAIN Minneapolis, MN 55402 612758.3099 FAx <ai' www.alliant-inc.com T. Cody Turnquist & Steve Schwanke February 17, 2021 Page 2 Proximity to Cardiff Lane and creation of conflicts with turning movements and decision making. Limited traffic on area roadways and limited crash history at Wilshire Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard intersection. Conclusion Traffic associated with the Villages of Island Park project will result in only a minor increase to current traffic numbers and reduction in historic average daily traffic for the property and area roadways. The project will not significantly impact roadway capacity nor significantly impact the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard, which experiences a limited number of crashes. Access to Wilshire Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard is appropriate given the constraints of Hennepin County and traffic volumes on area roadways. IR E P0.0P OS ED 18 VN RS W ILL GEN ERATE APPR.X III AIR i M TRIP S DAILY. IRIS VOWME JF TRAFFIC''WILL INCREASE TRAFFIC ON '@ILSR RE BOV LEVAR D BY AEOVT22%AND AD OUT 1 3%ER NXEDO BOVLWAlD TUXEDO BOULEVARD Ra iILImr9a1syIIaLIWilI •YPW �o.VY! �lW/LVN- �Y e[MM N :10M yp1��,'M �YY�1Y�/YLLmu� 1\IYF�MIY� MU SR RW 0. W EST BOVNO Tlk GFIC =13 VP [TY CAL EV Bi ING XW 0.5 � �2 m ._ \.©/ | � \ u 02 < ,o w !G- L «,t � aim � . m 91F I FfilJ) wl> aw . w.n• vn«c oes a evm� � L � Ivsae lewd OaRR Y111[XI ` \ �� IKX: Wn wlMgY0IX1NN lv/CS/i/ 1 D \ s�W ROi♦ 1 3 TUXEDO BOULEVARD MULTIPLE INILSHIREBLVD. SITEACCESS DISTANCE TO EXSTING ACCESS POINTS ALLIANT IXM181T 28 ry 6YIWMa WV2 Wvo Y.KOan DISCUSSED ALf E0.H ATIVE S I TE PLAN EGRESS AT LENGTH WITH CITY STAFF AND HEN HEP IN CO. AND BOTH HAD ADVERSE 0.EAC- TIONS TO THE LAYOUT AHD T0. AFFIC BOTTLENECK ISSUES , 7 Y a 1 � n g y 0 \ O N u ' 5 The City of Moundo �IT� ; 1� S O AA.PSAft YP MILES OPEN P AY FIELOHISIT HE W(E 1 � S Y7 $X HYV BJ PTAK ANO BEiCX .MILES PICNIC/ALP.'/GCJNO.VPEN PLAT FILE D/JISIT tXE LPI(E 1 //" r t( 13 Oow PARK .63 rnlLEs PIW ICA]PEN PLM FIELD .I yllS 'IQ OVNDEE PPAK .831AILES P YCROVND j s $'n'@ISCN PARK M MILES OASESALYY50NANOICKLE PL4/FIELOIESSKETESLI/ J(�%f 1SSE8SLLhBINISIPIEKLE 6SLL 9N WOOD BEAD PaAK .W MILES S'n' MMI.1 E. tl T. PaAK Ji MILES PIWr/PLmCAOUNO1CPEN PLA/FIELOIESSKETESLII T ENNISIP 1p ELEALLIISPJRE AREA H _1 VILLAGES OFISLAND PARK i I I I- Legend � — Dakota Ran ReglolulTSail — LCfdl Trall — Sidewalk — On $Veel5Mukla WU 11D PARK MAP CAN BE FOUND: Bll9S:11WWW.ClITOF1A0UNO.COI.11SlIESJ"l ES/YYHLIF6191IFNPLOADSIAREA PARKS IAAP A11D X.IIAENIl1E5 1011AOF E %NIBIT 3 VEGETATION BUFFER BOULDER GATHERING SPACE ,10 \ 4 k AGES OF ISLAND PARK NATURE TRAIL T onu. TUXEDO BOULEVARD RESIDENTAMENITY E%niertd MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 2, 2021 Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: David Goode, Jason Baker, Jon Ciatti, Samantha Erickson, Allen Andersen, and Jason Holt. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Consultant Rita Trapp and Secretary Jen Holmquist. Members of the public: Steve Schwanke, 100 Lake Street West, Wayzata; August Bruggeman, 100 Lake Street West, Wayzata; T. Cody Turnquist, 100 Lake Street West, Wayzata; Ralph Kempf, 4663 Wilshire #310; Kevin and Deb Larson, 4525 Denbigh Road; Jann Olsten, 3028 Pelican Point Circle; James Vettel, 4578 Denbigh Road; Paul Levin, 12630 Porcupine Ct., Eden Prairie; Dave Henderson, 3018 Pelican Point Circle; Danielle Rousselange, 236 25th Street SE, Buffalo; Dane Vocelka, 236 25th Street SE, Buffalo; Tim Lowe, 601 96th Street West Chanhassen; Rodney Beystrom, 4466 Denbigh Road; Jay Stemler, 4496 Denbigh Road, (Illegible name), 906 Liberty Lane, New Prague; Lynn Pinoniemi, 4560 Denbigh Road; Aaron Teal, 21353 Forest Hill Road, Richmond; Lee Breskler, 2544 N Saunders Drive, Minnetrista; Tom Rozman and Dana Ryeller, 4225 Denbigh Road; Mary Stimson and Kosta Moore-Kentos, 2551 38th Ave NE, St. Anthony; Ryan Love and family, 783 Riesgraf Rd, Carver; Drew Veelhoer, 248 Main Street E, Richmond; Jacob Guggenberger, 22994 Chapel Hill Rd, Cold Spring; Bob Ayer, 5475 Lost Lake Lane; Kelli Gillespie -Coen, 4400 Tuxedo Boulevard; Justin Davis and Patrice Mcdeid, 6320 Yosemite, Excelsior; Kelly and Shaun White, 3513 Lyric Ave, Wayzata. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Baker to approve meeting agenda, as amended, seconded by Ciatti. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Public Hearing for major -subdivision -preliminary plat of "Villages of Island Park" for property at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard; also review of rezoning and conditional use permit for townhomes and for a planned development area in the shoreland overlay district Applicants: Steve Schwanke of Inland Development Partners, LLC and Turnquist Properties Inc. Goode outlined the process, including the planning case presentation and public hearing. Trapp described the public hearing and the role of the planning Commission as an advisory board. Any recommendations will be followed by a public hearing at the City Council, as well. The project is located west of the Tuxedo Blvd and Wilshire Blvd intersection. The site is currently zoned B-2 General Business District. The site was formerly the location of a bar/restaurant that was closed in the early 1990s. The site has been vacant/undeveloped and the applicant has been looking for a redevelopment project for a number of years. The applicant is seeking several land use and subdivision requests. They are proposing to construct 18 townhome units. Each unit would be individually accessed. Wilshire and Tuxedo are the access roads. Garages are interior so a passerby would see front doors. There is a slope on the site that the applicant is using as a design feature. The applicant is working to preserve as many of the existing trees located on the west side as possible. The project will develop 17 2- bedroom units that are nearly 1,400 square feet in size and have a two -car garage. Also proposed is 1 ADA unit that will be just over 700 square feet in size and will have an oversized one -car accessible garage. This site is guided as Mixed Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Development can be commercial, residential, or both. The density proposed is allowed as the allowable density is 7- 15 units per acre. This site is 1.26 acres and would allow for 8-18 units to be constructed on the site. The preliminary plat is how the individual lots are created. The applicant is seeking to combine the existing two parcels and then create individual lots for each building and an outlot on the rest of the site. The project is proposed as rental so the having multiple units on one lot is appropriate. The applicant is requesting to rezone the site from B-2 General Business District to R-3 Multiple Family Residential. This is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A conditional use permit (CUP) is required for the townhouses as well as for developing the area for the residential shoreland planned development area (PDA). i�c The intent of a planned development area is that the dimensions are established and approved for as part of the site development plans. The site is 1.26 acres and meets the minimum size for a PDA. Setbacks proposed are 17.2 feet on Tuxedo, 18.7 feet on Wilshire and more than 50 feet of setback on the west side of the property which is near the tree line and the residential homes. Utilities are already established on this site and are of no concern. The square footage of each of the 17 units is well above what is stated in the code. The ADA unit is slightly under code requirements, but the proposed size seems reasonable due to the uniqueness of the ADA. It is proposed that 50%of the site will be open and each of the buildings will remain under the maximum building height of 35 feet. The site has two driveway accesses proposed with one located on Wilshire and one located on Tuxedo. There will be 7 visitor parking spots and an ADA accessible guest parking spot, as well. Relative to stormwater, the impervious surface cover is 50%. This is a reduction from existing conditions. The MCWD manages stormwater and this project is under review. The applicant will need to meet the requirements MCWD outlines. The City defers to the MWCD to make sure stormwater is being managed properly. Preliminarily they have noted that some adjustments to the site plan may be required related to volume control. The applicant may have to include some infiltration and that may be accomplished by the open space already on the site. Department/agency review comments are as follows: Hennepin County: The proposed driveway locations are acceptable but the County wants additional info about sufficient sight distances. No right of way is requested but Hennepin County suggested the need for drainage and utility easements. Requests to regrade along Wilshire to help with drainage. Mound Fire: The layout is positive for access as the buildings are accessible all the way around and the buildings will be sprinkled. Hydrant locations are acceptable. They requested the turning radius be evaluated to allow a ladder truck to make a turn, if needed. Trapp noted that the public hearing notice was sent to a larger area than was required so everyone could be aware of the requests. Comments received are primarily included in the packet, however, comments received after the packet was distributed was distributed to Planning Commission via email prior to the meeting and handed out at the meeting. The comments received were incorporated into the official record as part of the agenda amendment approved earlier in the evening. As noted in the packet, Staff has recommended approval of the requests with conditions. The conditions and proposed findings of fact are provided for Planning Commission consideration. i ON Baker asked what is included when the proposal is described as "50%open". For example, if parking included? Trapp said parking is not included, it is just the landscaped areas are considered open space. The site is also 50% impervious for hard cover that includes buildings, parking and sidewalks. Ciatti asked about the size for the ADA unit. How much below the minimum required square footage will the unit be? Trapp believed it's less than 100 square feet. Erickson asked how the comments from the consulting agencies and public will be addressed. Trapp said the applicant received the comments and the applicant is responsible for addressing the issues. If the city feels the changes are not met prior to the city Council meeting, staff will add them as conditions of approval. Erickson also asked if any traffic studies were completed. Trapp said traffic was evaluated by Hennepin County Transportation, City Engineering and Public Works. Trapp noted that a traffic study would be requested if one of the agencies determined the project met the merits. Given that this project is only 18 units, it wouldn't trigger enough of an increase in traffic to require a traffic study. Traffic will continue to be evaluated. Baker asked about the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in regards to the mixed use category. Trapp stated that the original comprehensive plan amendment establishing this site as mixed use was approved in May 2018. The comprehensive plan adopted in January of 2020 affirmed the mixed use designation. Baker noted that the future land use map for this area identifies it as medium density. Trapp said that mixed use was always the guide even before the 2040 plan was adopted. Trapp noted that Staff will review the 2040 future land use figure to ensure it is consistent with approvals. Steve Schwanke — Inland Development Partners at 100 Lake Street West in Wayzata. He noted there will be a presentation to address some of the issues already discussed. He introduced the team attending the meeting. T. Cody Turnquist 2000 Chestnut Road in Edina - He is a third generation property owner in the city. His family has enjoyed watching the growth in Mound. The subject property was purchased by his grandfather in 1989. It was a 4,800 square foot bar/restaurant with parking. He outlined that in 2001 they demoed the building, though the foundation and parking area remains. The city used the land for storage while Tuxedo was refurbished. The City restored the site after that project. The family continues to maintain the property. In 2018, the comprehensive plan was changed to mixed use allowed them to reimagine what was possible on the site for redevelopment. The intent is to create a tasteful development nestled between two busy roads. The site is surrounded by an active auto and marine shop on one side and single family homes on the other. They really took the time to try to find the best use for the property. Schwanke reiterated the desire to create a tasteful transition between the commercial and residential portions of the area. While they explored single family development with potential builders, there was no interest for a single family development here in part due to the relatively small size of the site. They worked with a market research firm and found a market gap for market rate, rental townhomes. There has been no such project for more than 30 years. This project will be targeted two demographics. A lot of consumers aged 55 plus are looking for this type of property. This age group wants to downsize, are looking to travel and get away from the lawn maintenance and snow removal that comes with home ownership. Another demographic interested in this type of residential product is the aging millennials. They aren't ready to own but need a home that gives them a house like feel. Within these two groups are renters with disposable income who don't want to own a home but also don't want apartment living. This type of renter is a renter by choice, not by necessity. There is not product like this in the area. The people who want this are forced to look in other communities. This kind of market rate, high end, rental town homes provides a product that is desired and the transition between commercial and residential that the area needs. Tim Whitten of Whitten Associates, 4159 Edmonton Place, Minnetonka. Whitten noted they were careful with the design to ensure every unit had a 2 car garage to cover the parking requirements. They also placed the front doors toward the street to provide a pleasing aesthetic. The varying units per building will also provide architectural interest. The sidewalks go to front door and connect throughout the development. Whitten noted that they paid special attention to the existing trees. They have worked with the site design to keep as many trees as possible and to work with the grading challenges. They adjusted the townhomes to match the grade of the site. Open space is 50% of the site most of which is manicured and maintained green space. Whitten presented a unit diagram showing how the three levels are configured. The ADA unit is designed to be accessible and has an oversized garage. A loft space was added to the ADA unit so the total square feet is greater than the requirement. The townhome design has a steeper roof, giving the project a classic, upscale look. Garages are all enclosed. The siding is paintable and comes with a variety different size panels to create a unique look. Turnquist discussed the interior finishes. From the garages, residents enter into a mud room with vinyl plank flooring which extends to the next level. Custom cabinets and Corian counter tops, tile back splashes, stainless steel appliances with an optional gas range upgrade. Upstairs will be carpet. Bathrooms will be vinyl plank or tile. Each unit has its own laundry, as well. Clark Wicklund of Alliant Engineering, 733 Marquette Avenue in Minneapolis addressed some of the public comments. Historically the site was 60% impervious and the stormwater drained to Tuxedo to the south and Wilshire to the north, with most flowing to the right of way and received by two catch basins on Wilshire. Proposed conditions are 50% impervious, a 10% reduction. Proposed internal storm sewer between structures will be underground with water flowing underground to the north to the catch basin on Wilshire. Applicant is working with MCWD to meet their requirements. Tree preservation is adamantly hoping to keep as many existing trees as possible. The proposed conditions exceed the requirements, preserving 67% of existing trees. Wicklund discussed the transportation concerns. Fire trucks and emergency vehicles could pass through the site, as well as trash removal vehicles. Trip generation for 18 townhomes will generate 132 trips daily as compared to a primary use of a sit down restaurant (previous use) which would generate 561 trips daily. Current layout provides access to both Wilshire and Tuxedo. This allows for flexibility as drivers will find the path of least resistance. The trip generation proposed results in 66 trips daily to each roadway, an increase of less than 3% on each roadway. You typically have to reach at least 10% increase to trigger any traffic studies. What is being proposed is way less than if the site were commercial. Traffic is not a concern. Snow storage will not be a problem with the 50% open space. Goode asked if the Commissioners have any questions for the applicant. Jason Holt asked if the applicant considered selling the townhomes instead of renting. Schwanke believes the pricing needed to sell them would not be possible. He is comfortable with the rental market and is sure there is a demand for this product. Holt asked how much rent is. Rates range from $2,400-$2,900 per month plus additional fees for pets or other. Holt wondered if additional parking would be available because he doesn't believe there is enough parking for visitors. He also wonders where will the kids play? Schwanke said that each unit has two covered spots in their garages. No parking is allowed in the drive area. On -site visitor parking is sufficient based on other projects they have developed. Holt notes that if the 8 visitor spots are full additional visitors would have to park on the street. Holt asked how long the property was for sale. Turnquist said the family offered the property for sale 6-8 years ago. It was on the market for about a year. Holt asked if Tuxedo will have a turn lane because if not, the area will get backed up. Trapp said the county department of transportation, the city engineer and city public works department have all looked at the proposal and no recommendations were made to change anything. Goode opened the public hearing. Rodney Beystrom, 4466 Denbigh Road. He's lived here 34 years. Mr. Beystrom noted that he was at the meeting at city hall a couple years ago when preliminary discussions were begun. He felt that at that time no one was in favor of the project being rentals. Mr. Beystrom expressed concern that based on his experience these rental properties may eventually become section 8. While he is not opposed to the design of the project, he is opposed to rentals as he feels that they devalue surrounding properties, people don't want to live next to them, and they cause higher crime rates. Mr. Beystrom indicated that he would be comfortable if it was a 55 and over rental. He stated that he doesn't understand why this project couldn't be owner occupied. He also noted that where Wilshire and Tuxedo come together, you can barely make that turn. He believes something would have to be done to that intersection to make that turn easier. He expresses his gratitude to the Commissioners for their hard work. Ralph Kempf, 4363 Wilshire Boulevard. Mr. Kemp indicated that he lives across the street. He thinks this is a great improvement over the prior suggestions to use the property. He likes that this proposal has less density. He remembers public discussions where residents were saying they didn't want riff raff in Mound. He thinks those residents should not have that concern with this project. Mr. Kemp expressed concern about parking and traffic patterns. He has driven this area quite often. Tuxedo is the main artery that drains the island. He believes this road has about 1/3 more traffic that Wilshire does. None of the graphics show the almost blind intersection because of the garage buildings on the side of that curve. He believes the intersection is scary and he is surprised that the consulting agencies didn't have any comments on that. Mr. Kemp also noted the Lakewinds driveway is just a half of a block beyond the Tuxedo entrance of this complex and right across the street is the driveway to Pelican Point. The commuter traffic on Tuxedo is fast moving and he proposes considering a u-shape to make two accesses on Wilshire. This would give a traffic control option. Mr. Kemp noted that parking is inadequate for Lakewinds and is continual problem. He worried that the proposed visitor parking spaces will not be enough. He would encourage the developer to attempt to add some additional visitor parking. Jann Olsten, 3028 Pelican Point Circle. Mr. Olsten agreed with the prior issues raised with rental for this project. He expressed concern about safety and traffic. He thinks packing the maximum allowable density is too much. He expressed concern about whether the no parking in front of the garages is going to be enforceable and how deliveries and fire trucks could get through if someone is illegally parked. He also asked about how recreational vehicles will be handled. Mr. Olsten stated that he believes that because of the characteristics of the property the density should be pulled back from the number units being proposed. His biggest concern is for safety. Wilshire and Tuxedo are busy with cars regularly exceeding the 35 MPH speed limit. He suggested that increasing the amount of traffic by 2% is too much at 132 trips a day. Mr. Olsten stated that he believes that the proposed development does not allow for safe entry to the busy roadways. This proposed development is positioned as such that you can't see oncoming °`. traffic. He believes cutting off the access and reducing the number of units to 10 or 12 would make it more attractive and safer. Rodney Beystrom returned to add to his earlier comment that directly across the street on Wilshire is the entrance for the auto repair. He also added that immediately east of the site on the north side of Wilshire is a street called Cardiff. He said this is the only access to the Denbigh neighborhood. With the high speeds of traffic, it's already hard to get out. Other cars need to wait until you turn out before they can go in because the road there is so narrow. He is concerned that there would be a significant conflict to accessing that neighborhood. Jann Olsten returned asking for clarification about park dedication regulations. Trapp replied that park land dedication is handled separately from what is being discussed tonight as a subsequent phase of the approval process. She also added that in Mound park dedication requirements are typically met by a cash dedication instead of a land dedication. In response to a follow up question about how park dedication funds are used, Trapp clarified that according to state statute the park land dedication fees can only be used to improve the City's park system. It can't be used to address traffic concerns. Mr. Olsten asked for clarification as to the status of the bylaws, home owner associations, articles of incorporation and protective covenants. Trapp noted that these documents are part of the development agreement phase of the project which does not happen until the City Council considers the final plat. Mr. Olsten noted that he would like the record to reflect that he hopes that when it gets to that point that the neighbors have some input. Tina Rozman, 4552 Denbigh Road. She has lived here 8 years and traffic conditions are awful/dangerous. She noted hers is a very active neighborhood. Pedestrian traffic has not been addressed. She believes it's a death trap. She thinks people are not taking these risks seriously. Cars go way too fast and people are already at risk. She requested a traffic study to determine how to make this area safe whether this project proceeds or not. Jay Stemler, 4476 Denbigh Road. Mr. Stemler noted that the developer is marketing to millennials; he wondered where the kids are expected to play? This is a highly congested area. Kelli Gillespie -Coen, 4400 Tuxedo Blvd. Ms. Gillespie -Coen is the owner of the property next door and also has experience in real estate brokerage. She agrees with the market demographics. She noted that those demographics don't typically have children. She stated that in her experience there is a big demand for rentals. Some people need temporary housing while building homes and others want to try out the area to see if it's a city they want to live in. She owns rental units that rent at these price points. She has typically seen renters in these demographics take care of their properties. Having a for sale product typically only works if the city has given substantial subsidies. That's not feasible in this market. URN In regards to the traffic, she knows people just drive too fast. She is cautious and she has never had a problem. She thinks the drivers need to pay attention and a traffic study can't account for them. Rentals don't always decrease property values. She was at the 2018 meeting. Residents made it clear they wanted mixed use. She knows that everyone wants commercial but, ironically, that would cause more traffic issues. She hopes people won't get caught up on the small stuff. Business owners in this town want higher population in the city. She has had discussions with property owners of this proposed project. They aren't going to tarnish their reputations by promising one thing and providing a different product. Goode asked for additional comments. Hearing none he closed the public hearing. Baker noted that the zoning of R-3 requires a minimum of 2 parking spaces, he wonders if mixed use has a minimum. Trapp says parking is based on the individual uses not on the mixed use district designation. Ciatti noted he heard two main themes. The first one is that rental units will tarnish the area. He noted, however, that Lakewinds has rentals. A member of the audience states that they are condominiums and a lot of the owners use them as investments and do rent them out. Ciatti noted that given that, adding 18 rental units to the area is of no concern. Traffic is the other major theme. Adding the number of trips discussed, he would tend to rely on the professionals who determine the trip generations and the increase does not seem large. He noted traffic does move fast and there is a blind spot. He wondered if there is a right turn only option that could be established. Sidewalk and pedestrian safety is being addressed by the city Council but he is unsure if this particular area is included in that discussion. Goode asked if the Commission is ready to take action or is more information needed. Ciatti said he is comfortable proceeding. Holt said he is not comfortable after hearing all the comments of the people who will be neighbors to this property if the project proceeds. He doesn't know if this is the right project for this land. He thinks 18 units are too many and parking is an issue. There are a lot of things to be figured out and he doesn't think it's ready. Baker thought it was a nice design. The setback on Tuxedo is more than the commercial property next to it. He noted the buffer between the residential neighborhood. The setback on Wilshire is good. But he does wonder if what is being proposed is too much for the land. The traffic does allow people to make the right turn. He liked the idea of possibly putting both accesses on Wilshire. He believed in general that corner needs a stop light. Baker noted that he heard the negative connotations regarding the units being rentals but doesn't believe this product could survive as section 8 housing. He doesn't believe the 8 visitor parking spaces is enough. He liked the green space and noted that additional parking would take away from that. Erickson stated, if a vote is held this evening, she would vote no as traffic and safety have not been explored. She lives in this area and the pedestrian piece is not being met. It is a highly ON active neighborhood. Traffic studies completed on a sunny July day will provide different results than when traffic is higher during ice fishing season. She doesn't feel confident that pedestrian and traffic safety has been considered. She has no issue with the property holding rental units. She wonders if any recommendation could have conditions that a traffic study be required. Goode summarized the concerns he noted from the discussion: 1) Concern about the number of units. Suggestion is to reduce the number of units. 2) The traffic pattern of the units themselves and inadequate parking, on site. 3) Not enough study on traffic and safety. Ciatti pointed out that some of the comments focus on this proposal, however the developer should not be responsible for fixing existing traffic problems. Trapp outlined Planning Commission options. Commissioners can table the request to seek additional information, recommend approval or deny. If the Commission recommends approval, there are conditions provided in the planning packet and Commissioners are able to add conditions as they see fit. If the Commission denies, it is requested that a summary be made of the findings of fact relative to the denial. Trapp reiterated Ciatti's comments that the Commission should consider if the concerns are based on existing conditions or the application. She noted that if the item is tabled, then the Commission needs to choose a date to discuss the topic, most likely the March 2, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting. Trapp noted that the preliminary plat and the CUP go hand in hand. They should not be voted on separately. One motion can be made for all the recommendations. Schwanke noted that he will focus on the items, in question, that would pertain to their project. He is as concerned with getting things right, as the neighbors are. He asked that the Commission identify all the issues they would like the applicants to work on and they will prepare that for the future meeting. He also stated that if they are allowed to become new neighbors in this neighborhood, they would be very active in rectifying existing issues. The Commissioners discussed the reasons for tabling the discussion. MOTION by Holt to table the discussion due to number of units, traffic/pedestrian safety, parking, and rental concerns. The discussion will be tabled to March 2, 2021, Seconded by Baker. MOTION carried unanimously. Smith noted for the members of the public who are in attendance, that while the issue has been tabled, and the applicant will have the chance to respond to the issues presented, the public hearing portion of the meeting is closed and additional notice letters are not required to be mailed. She reminds everyone that city staff is available for questions via phone or email. 22415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952)472-0604 Staff Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: February 2, 2021 Re: February 2, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Item No. 3 Approval of the Agenda with any Amendments --Additional ISupplemental Information for Agenda Item No. 5 A —Public Hearing for Review of Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat and Review of Lands Use Applications for the Proposed Villages of Island Park Project Request As provided under Agenda Item No. 3 (Approval of the Agenda, with any Amendments), Staff respectfully recommends the February 2, 2021 meeting agenda be amended to add additional information received on February, 2021 from Kenn and Carol Boyles who reside at 2930 Pelican Point Circle regarding Item 5 A: New/Additional Information Memorandum dated February 2, 2021 Page 29 a Letter from Kenn/Carol Boyles dated February 1, 2021 Pages 29 b-29 d i ON To: City of Mound; Planning Commission February 2, 2021 From: Kenn/Carol Boyles (owners/residents) 2930 Pelican Pt Ct in Mound, Mn Subject: Proposed "Villages of Island Park" development plan and associated zoning change. We received a letter/plan on January 30 from the City of Mound concerning a proposed rezoning of this subject parcel from commercial to high density residential for a city review meeting to be held on February 2. We have no issues with development of this property as it is currently a vacant lot and previously had a small commercial business there. HOWEVER, we are very concerned with the proposed plan for high -density residential units on this property as indicated in the plan and zoning reclassification. The plan proposes to have 18 living units on about 1/3 of an acre of buildings. Total site is 1.2 acres. Approximately 1/3 acre is the size of a 1 living unit/lot in the surrounding neighborhood. So clearly, this is VERY high density for a Mound residential neighborhood. We will not address the details of the proposed unit design layouts. It does seem to have serious practical issues including significant safety and access concerns that will impact residents. Our concerns: Densi Adding a 100 individuals (includes adults, children, visitors, dogs, etc) permanently into a surrounding residential area is obviously going to seriously impact the neighborhood and related infrastructure. -There are no sidewalks, parks or playgrounds in Island "Park" or even the surrounding area. This particularly impacts families and children in this development. The result is residents will have to drive. - Since the development units have no driveways, children are likely to play in the alley. Vehicles leaving garages have an obstructed view of what is in the alley when backing out of garages. The consequence is residents including children and pets are in peril. E -The plan shows an entrance off Tuxedo Blvd. The hill on Tuxedo obstructs the traffic view when exiting or entering the development. Additional traffic at the Tuxedo entrance from the development will significantly aggravate this traffic issue. Results are auto accidents are more likely. -It does not appear the plan considered the need for required service vehicle traffic into and out of and parking in this development. This includes large emergency vehicles (fire trucks, ambulances, etc), garbage trucks, delivery vehicles, individual unit service vehicles, lawn/snow plows, etc. These vehicles cannot park internal to the development without blocking access to the residents or consuming the 6 "visitor" spaces. There are no individual unit driveways. These vehicles will need to park on Tuxedo Blvd or Wilshire Blvd. These are both narrow/busy streets. They may already have restricted parking? This means impossible parking situation in the neighborhood. Environment: -Impervious surface at 50% (or more) is excessive. This property has steep topography that will result very rapid water runoff/release into the surrounding neighborhood. The plan shows no holding pond to mediate this issue. One can only imagine results of another future 6 inch rain fall. - There appears to be no plan for snow storage after plowing within the development. It could be hauled away but that obviously is not timely, particularly if for emergency situations. Any significant snowfall will require immediate snow removal and storage or any emergency situation may become disastrous. -The plan shows a single row on plantings (2 ft wide?) shielding the development from Tuxedo Blvd. With a 17 ft setback from the front lot line. No new residential home in the neighborhood can be built that way. The impact is the 3-story development will obviously loom very large on the Tuxedo side. Recommendations: - The development plan needs to be significantly revised to a lower density, fewer units, and more open space. Potential resident safety concerns also need to be addressed. The front lot line on the Tuxedo side should be as any new residential build (3Oft?). - The Tuxedo Blvd access should be relocated to a second Wilshire Blvd access and/or the city needs to expand these narrow streets to include a turning lane as part of the development plan. - The development needs to create an on -site buffer/storage for rainwater and snow. - Although the full landscape plan was not received in our mail package, there obviously needs to be MUCH more screening of this development on ALL sides. - As a result: We recommend this property remain zoned 132 business. It is a nice spot for a small business particularly if coordinated with the adjoining small business. "I PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 29, 2021 SUBJECT: Village of Island Park Development (Case No. 21-01) Public Hearin¢— Major SubdivisionPreliminaryPlat; and review/discussion/consideration of Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for townhouses and a Residential Shoreland Planned Development Area APPLICANT: Steve Schwanke, Inland Development Partners OWNER: Turnquist Properties LLC LOCATION: 4451 Wilshire Boulevard (PID No. 19-117 23-31 0021 & 19117- 23-31-0020) MEETING DATE: February 2, 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed Use ZONING: B-2 General Business District The applicant, Inland Development Partners, has applied for multiple land use and subdivision approvals for the redevelopment of a property on the island. The site is generally west of the intersection of Wilshire and Tuxedo Boulevards at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard. The site is the former location of a bar and restaurant that had a 4,800 squarefoot building and ]] parking stalls. The development will consist of five structures with a total of 18 rental units, including one accessible unit. The structureswill comprise of a two unit building, three unit building, two fourunitbuildings, and a fiveunitbuilding. Access to the site will be provided by one driveway on Wilshire Boulevard and one driveway on Tuxedo Boulevard. The buildings will be served by an internal sidewalk system that connects residents to guest parking areas and the exterior of the site. Project Plans Due to file size the Planning Commission packet contains a site location map and site plan. The application and full plan set is available at this link. Hardcopies of planswill be provided to Planning Commission members upon individual request. REVIEW PROCEDURE The applications under review include the following land use and subdivision requests: • Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat • Rezoning • Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Residential Shoreland Planned Development Area and a townhouse use 60-Day Land Use Application Review Process Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. For the purpose of Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, "Day 1" is determined to be December 31, 2021 as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 645.15. The 60-day timeline expires on or around March 1, 2021 unless an extension is executed by the City. An extension of the review period can occur if agreed to bythe applicant. 120-day Subdivision Review Process Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.358, local government agencies are required to approve or deny subdivision requests within 120 days. For the purpose of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358, "Day 1" is determined to be December 31, 2021 in accordance with MS. 645.15. The 120-day timeline expires on or around April 30, 2021. An extension of the review period can occur if agreed to by the applicant. Public Hearing Planning Commission City Code Section 121-61 requires that a public hearing for review of the major subdivision/preliminary plat be held by the Planning Commission. The public hearing notice was published in the Laker on January 23, 2021 and posted on the City Hall bulletin board on January 19, 2021. The public hearing notice was mailed to all affected property owners in the project area or located within 350 feet of the proposed major subdivision -preliminary plat per Hennepin County property information on January 21, 2021. The map to the right shows the required notification area in orange and the I'm, additional properties that received mailed notice in gray. The notice was also emailed to the Lakewinds Board/HOA and Pelican Point Board/HOA on January 22, 2021. Information about the project was also posted on the City's website on January 22, 2021. City Council According to City Code, the City Council is required to hold the public hearings for review of the rezoning, conditional use permit, and major subdivision/preliminary plat (Sections 129-34, 129-38, and 121-61). It should also be noted that the City is required to post any amendment to the City Code on the website for 10 days prior to consideration by the City Council. Public Comments Received Comments or emails received by 1:00 p.m. on Friday, January 29, 2021 were included in the Planning Commission agenda packet for the February 2nd Planning Commission meeting. Comments received after that time will be presented to the Planning Commission at the meeting. Information submitted will be made part of the public record. The City received the following comments about the project: Rodney Beystrom-4466 Denbigh Road Ray, as you may or may not recall previously, people in the general Wilshire - Tuxedo area are mostly adamantly against rental units being put in the Turnquist property behind Island Park Skelly Auto Repair. Previous early on meetings that I attended a couple of years ago clearly brought this out. The city meeting is coming up on February 2nd regarding this. I thought they were going to look into owner occupied Townhouses or Condos for the general public on this developable property. I personally am not in favor of rentals either having been a government inspector for 23 years that had to deal with Section 8 rentals and problems they caused. Nothing starts out generally with Section 8 but can turn into it quickly and easily. The facts are that when one Section 8 unit gets into one of the rentals and problems start arising others next to them relocate and move out; then these vacancies turn into Section 8, etc., etc. It's not long before the entire property turns into Section 8. These units have bad reputations for very valid reasons often times. Also rental properties have an affect on nearby owner occupied homesteaded dwellings because no one wants to live close to rental complexes and so properties get devalued and are harder to sell and owners often have to sacrifice equity in order to get a buyer. Why can't this proposed project be for owner occupied dwelling units? I am disappointed they are reverting back to the rental mentality again in a predominant owner occupied neighborhood housing territory. No one wanted it a couple years ago when things were being discussed and I doubt if many will change their minds on this topic. In addition, as you may be aware regarding stats on this, crime is higher in neighborhoods surrounding rental complexes. No time here for all the speculative reasoning on this but it is an unfortunate fact. FYI. Thanks for your ear, wd Carol and Kenneth Boyles — 2930 Pelican Point Circle Sarah, we are out-of-town and will not be back in time to personally express our concerns about the townhouse development. We have lived in Pelican Point two years in the first small cul de sac as you enter. A small woods provides privacy between our home and the road. Our concerns center around traffic and density in the development. The development will be crowded and the will add to the traffic as you leave Pelican Point. It is difficult to see cars due to the incline of the street as you enter and leave Pelican Point. The value of the homes in Pelican Point will probably be diminished due to the general density in the area. If the Skelly Station property was part of the plan, I would feel differently but the space is very limited for the number of units, parking for these units and yard space for them. I do hope that these considerations are part of your plan. The homes that will be behind these units will also be negatively impacted. Please consider the existing homes in the area. These people have already made a commitment to the area. Their concerns must be important to the City of Mound. I believe that most homes in the immediate area are "owned properties" not rentals. Please recognize the difference and maintain the value of the area. Thank you for your consideration. These additional comments were also provided in a separate email from the Boyles: 1) The impervious surface is excessive 50 %. 35-40% should be the max given the steep elevation changes. Where is the plan to handle the run-off?? 2) 3 story building this close to the road(s) is not an expectable site plan. There needs to be more buffer (space). The buildings will shadow the roads. 3) 9 space visitor parking is low. I assume there will be no parking allowed on the adjoining roads as they are narrow and obstructed. Richard K. Check and Nancy D. Check— 2918 Pelican Point Circle We believe the proposed development is appropriate and an acceptable use of the described property, given the following requested condition: We request that the developer be required to make the driveway an enforceable one-way, entry and exit to the property, with entry from Tuxedo Boulevard and exit on to Wilshire Boulevard. "I- 1. Nearly all traffic exiting the property will be traveling toward Mound on Wilshire Blvd, or toward Spring Park, also on Wilshire Blvd. Very little vehicle traffic will head south on Tuxedo Blvd. since there are no beaches, marinas, or major commercial developments accessible from Tuxedo Blvd southward through the island chain. 2. Any vehicles exiting onto Tuxedo Blvd. will join Wilshire Blvd., and if going to Mound at that point, must negotiate a greater than ninety degree left turn, with hazard and difficulty. (Not depicted on the preliminary plat) 3. Vehicles traveling on Tuxedo Blvd. from the south of this property, heading northward, must travel over a hill providing little time for such a vehicle, at commuting speed, to react to a vehicle exiting the property at Tuxedo Blvd. (Vehicles entering Tuxedo Blvd. from Pelican Point Circle, farther south than the point of entry of the subject property, have the advantage of a better sight line in both directions of the hill, and can better manage oncoming Tuxedo Blvd. traffic.) Mike and Cindy Gilbertson -4350 Wilshire Boulevard As designed, we are opposed to the Villages of Island Park project proposed near the intersection of Wilshire Blvd and Tuxedo Blvd on Island Park. Our questions and concerns revolve around the following issues: Scale and Density: The scale of this project with 18 rental units on only 1.26 acres (55,000 square feet) of land is way out of character with the neighborhood. This averages one unit per 3055 square feet —significantly lower than the minimum of 10,000 square feet required per normal residential lot in Mound (without special variances). Most homes in the area (not including Lakewinds) are one and two-story owner occupied single-family homes or duplexes. The primary (if not only) reason for this density is to maximize profits for the landowner and developer. This land has been for sale for a number of years. There are many reasons I suspect including it probably was overpriced at first, it is a relatively small lot between two busy noisy roads and zoning and code restrictions limit what can be built there. At one point, more recently, I believe it was priced at around $150,000. How much more is it worth if Mound allows major variances to get this many units built? The neighborhood is not in desperate need for 18 more rental units to solve a housing crisis — there are already hundreds across the street at Lakewinds and hundreds more minutes away at Bayview and Minnetonka Edgewater Apartments. Hardcover and Setbacks: What hardcover and setback variances will this project require to fit this many rental units into such a small space? It appears that it will have a hardcover of around 50%- well over the limit for other residential property in Mound. I am guessing this project will ask for major variances to be able to fit this many units on such a small lot. Maximizing profits should not be viewed as a hardship when considering making exceptions for projects like this. We would oppose any variances or changes to zoning to allow this `ri project to be built here. (We would not oppose a change in zoning from commercial to R2 though to allow for a smaller residential development). Access and Safety: We live on Wilshire Blvd just down the hill from this area and I have seen the traffic on Wilshire grow over the last 30+ years to the point that it is a challenge to find an opening in traffic —especially during the morning and evening commutes —to safely enter Wilshire Blvd. While the additional traffic caused by 18 more rental housing units will be relatively small given the current level of traffic it is still is a concern. Access on and off Tuxedo will be a safety issue. There is a blind corner at the Y between Wilshire and Tuxedo and a blind hill to the south on Tuxedo. Traffic moves fast through here. Honked horns and squealing tires caused by cars stopping and trying to turn into or enter Wilshire from Lakewinds are a regular occurrence. Many vehicles swerve onto the shoulder illegally to go around cars waiting to turn into the Lakewinds driveway. This same issue would be a problem at the entrances to the proposed development. To help with the councils' decision process it might be worth considering the history of the Pelican Point development across the street from this proposed project. I think I am safe to say that the surrounding neighborhood and Mound itself considers the Pelican Point neighborhood a beautiful development and an asset to the city. What is there today nearly didn't happen. The original proposal was for three massive 8 story (yes, eight story) condominium towers with hundreds of units built on the bluff along the Lake Minnetonka shoreline. Would we be proud of this type of development today? Mound would have been vilified in every community around the lake for approving such a massive eyesore totally out of scale to the surrounding area and setting a precedence for other developers to try the same thing elsewhere. Why was such a project even proposed? Only one main reason — maximize profits for the landowner and developer (and taxes for the city). Profits are fine — that's how our system works — but cities should not ignore the community and change zoning requirements and building restrictions to maximize profits for a few. In this situation, the community spoke up loudly against the proposal and won by only one vote. Thankfully, the landowners, developers and community re -imagined the development and designed an amazing project that fit with the neighborhood, did not require significant variances and honored the historical building height restrictions in communities around the Lake. Everyone won in the end. Proposed Alternative Development While a housing project with a much smaller scale — four to eight units would work on this lot and fit with the character of the neighborhood - another project to consider would be to work with Hennepin County to buy the land and the old Skelly Station and design and build a roundabout at the intersection of Wilshire and Tuxedo Blvd. This would significantly improve traffic flow, visibility and safety at what is now an extremely busy blind "I intersection. Traffic flow here is probably the third busiest in Mound right behind Shoreline Blvd and Commerce Blvd. It would eliminate the stop sign on Wilshire Blvd (which many people try to roll on through) and tend to slow and calm traffic leading to and from the island. Hopefully the Mound City Council will seriously consider the significant problems and negative impacts of this high density project as proposed and reject the plan or require significant changes in the scale and design to better fit the character and concerns of this neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Dave & Barb Henderson - 3018 Pelican Point Cir. We have reviewed the plans for the 18 unit townhouse rental project at 4451 Wilshire Blvd and want to voice our objection to the project. We live at 3018 Pelican Point Cir„ across from the proposed development. We believe that 18 units is far too many units to have on a property that size. This is already a hazardous traffic area where the road Ys at the old Skelly station at Wilshire and Tuxedo and these units will make it much more dangerous with people turning in and out of the proposed development. This is a high traffic area on two roads that are not designed for high traffic. The units also look to have very little setback from Tuxedo Rd which makes the development both unattractive and hazardous from a traffic standpoint. We hope that you will take our concerns into consideration as you review approving this project. Thank you. Ray and Trish Kevitt — 2898 Pelican Point Circle We live in the Pelican Point development and are in receipt of your notice letter as a resident living within 350 feet of the proposed development. Our specific home address is 2898 Pelican Point Cir, Mound, MN 55364. Our questions are as follow: 1. Will the current auto repair station ingress and egress points onto Wilshire Blvd and Tuxedo Blvd remain in their current positions? 2. Has a traffic study either been ordered or is to be performed? 3. The proximity of the multiple ingress and egress points from both the existing auto service and the new development are very close on each Blvd. and would seem to warrant center turns lanes and/or excel/decel lanes given the distance to the Y intersection. Has this been considered from a life safety traffic management standpoint? 4. Given this is a "for rent' project, what accommodations have been made for affordable housing? 5. Has the developer submitted a plan to address ESG and DEI concerns and issues? 6. Will all subcontractors solicited for bidding be made public? 7. Will there be a public record of how much of the project is awarded to minority owned businesses? 8. Will minority workforce numbers on the project be made public? ; 9. Has there been a full Environmental Impact Report study completed or will be ordered? 10. Will there be any lane closures to either Wilshire or Tuxedo Blvd as a result of construction? 11. Does the current storm water and waste management system support the addition of these added loads? 12. Will there be any on site water detention/retention required? If not, why not? Bud Mutterer I am responding to letter re plans for above address. I think handicap spaces should be more centrally located, now they are on north end of project. I would make those regular and expand by at least two more north of proposed handicap spaces. It appears more spaces could be made on south portion of project. If there are not enough spaces I think over flow will park in parking lot of Lakewinds I don't think there are enough parking spaces for guests and extra vehicles Jann Olsten — (on behalf of Pelican Point Homeowners Association) I'm the Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors for Pelican Point Homeowners Association, and I'm writing on behalf of the Association. You and I talked yesterday about the proposed Village of Island Park development (I'll refer to it as the Village), and I appreciate the helpful information you gave me. This is a follow-up to that conversation. As you may know, Pelican Point consists of 40 homes and, currently, 72 homeowners, located directly across Tuxedo Boulevard from the Village. While we have anticipated development of the subject property for some time (and we're pleased to see it converting to residential use) we do have some concerns about the proposal that we'd like to bring to your attention. Our primary concerns have to do with traffic safety and density, and how they relate to one another. The Village is situated very near the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard. It is a highly trafficked and, we believe, dangerous intersection, with traffic often approaching the intersection at greater than the posted 30 miles per hour (note: we do appreciate having the Mound police often patrolling the area for speeders). Adding potentially 36 or more vehicles making frequent trips in and out of the Village — near the tip of the intersection — only increases the possibility of serious accidents involving vehicles, bicycles and/or pedestrians. While reducing the density of the Village would help reduce those risks, the dangers are compounded by the proposed entrance onto Tuxedo Boulevard. Those of us in Pelican Point experience firsthand the challenges of entering/exiting Tuxedo from our neighborhood, yet we have the benefit of entering Tuxedo with a right-hand turn, at the top of the hill, not crossing against traffic. However, entering Tuxedo from the Village would require a left-hand turn, across oncoming traffic, only a short distance below the crest of the hill, resulting in limited visibility and creating a dangerous situation. We believe that entrance should be eliminated. Thanks for this opportunity for input. We'd like to help make the Village both an attractive and safe addition to our area. Jay & Amy Stemler-4476 Denbigh Road Planning Commission and concerned residents, I just want to register our adamant feelings against the proposed property development behind Skelly Auto and adjacent to Cardiff road, the entrance to our secluded residential area on Denbigh Rd. We purchased this location based on the quiet nature and peaceful and safe spot here on the Island. We feel the additional RENTAL housing units will add significant traffic concerns as well as transient apartments living in a mostly single dwelling neighborhood. Developers, in general, have the best intentions of proposing to planning commissions all the natural benefits to an area with the proposal to maintain good and safe rental properties only to convert them over time to section 8 housing. Along with that comes the safety concern, vandalism and security that comes with said apartment residents and ultimately section 8 housing. We didn't buy our property with the understanding that a rental complex would be located only 100 yards from our front door. Our property values and resale values were not taking into account the rental units and as such, we do not want the above units. Why can't these be owner occupied units that owners can take pride of and add to the betterment of the island neighborhood? The ownership will add to the tax base revenue and ultimately enhance our property value instead of detract and erode said value. Thank you for listening and I hope you take our feelings into account in reviewing the proposal and vote NO. <71fw STAFF / CONSULTANT / AGENCY / UTILITIES REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants, agencies, and private utilities for review and comment. A summary of the comments received is provided below: Chuck Mayers, CenterPoint Energy CenterPoint Energy has no objection or issues related to the Villages of Island Park Preliminary Plat/Rezoning/Conditional Use Permit Application. Jason Gottfried, Hennepin County Transportation The following summarizes the letter from Hennepin County Transportation that is included in the packet: • The proposed driveway locations are acceptable pending confirmation of sufficient sight distances. • While no right-of-way is requested, Hennepin County suggests that the City obtain a 10-foot drainage and utility easement around the site perimeter to establish proper ditch drainage. • The developer is requested to regrade along Wilshire Boulevard to establish a proper drainage ditch under the proposed access. The County will be evaluating flow rates and additional treatment may be needed if flow rates cannot match existing. • A permit will be required prior to any construction. Chris Remus, Metropolitan Council Interceptor Engineering Services MCES has no interceptor facilities in the vicinity of this project. Grace Barlow, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) The applicant is working with MCWD to clarify the amount of reduction of impervious surface that will occur on the site. Depending on that determination, the applicant may need to add a volume control measure to the site for impervious surface. MCWD has preliminarily indicated that this could be accomplished through the incorporation of soil amendments over the site and/or the construction of a small infiltration swale. Mound Fire Department and MnSpect There are no preliminary building issues to address with the proposed plans. The applicant will need to continue to work with MnSpect as the project moves forward. Relative to fire code and life safety the layout has many positives, including the fact that one can access the site from both Tuxedo and Wilshire, that the buildings are generally accessible on all sides, and that the structures are to have fire suppression systems <71121> installed. The fire hydrant locations proposed are acceptable. The site plan fire access road configuration and widths meet current standards. However, they are not wide enough for parking and the movement of fire equipment so the applicant has agreed that no parking should be allowed. The applicant has been requested to modify the turning radius within the development as it would not accommodate the 78-foot ladder truck that would likely respond to a call. DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL REVIEW Comprehensive Plan The project area is designated as Mixed Use in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. As described in the future land use table on page 32, mixed use is "meant to support a variety of commercial, residential, and public uses." The designation was intended to provide flexibility so that property owners have options when considering redevelopment. To provide further clarification of the City's intent, each mixed use area has its own one -page description of the intent, character and approach to mixed use. As seen in the attached summary, the Wilshire -Tuxedo Gateway was shown as having the potential for either residential or commercial, with both townhomes and multi -family being considered appropriate. The use of this site for residential is in keeping with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan noted that the site was likely appropriate for townhomes and suggested that building design should consider incorporating elements such as individual entrances, porches, and patios/small entrance yards. The City of Mound evaluates density on an area -wide basis. For mixed use areas such as the Wilshire -Tuxedo Gateway, density is evaluated based on the area identified as having the potential to redevelop in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and any areas proposed to be redeveloped as part of an application that may not have been previously identified. Based on the 18 units proposed for the 1.26 acre site, the density of the redevelopment area within would be 14.3 units per acre. This is within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan density range of 8 to 15 units per acre. With this development, the maximum allowed residential development in this mixed use area will have occurred. Preliminary Plat (Sec. 121-61 through Sec. 121-64) The Villages of Island Park encompasses a site that is 1.26 acres in size. The plat establishes a lot for each of the structures as well as an outlot that encompasses the remainder of the site. As required by the City Code Chapter 121 (Subdivisions), the applicant shall place drainage and utility easements along the perimeter of the property. In their comments, the Hennepin County Transportation Department recommended 10 foot easements. `71f� Rezoning The site is currently zoned B-2 General Business District. The applicant has requested to rezone the property to R-3 Multiple Family Residential. The rezoning would be in keeping with the Mixed Use designation in the Comprehensive Plan as it is the only residential district that includes townhouses and multiple dwelling structures, which were identified in the Comprehensive Plan as the intended uses for this area. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) A conditional use permit is required for two parts of the project: 1) the townhouses and 2) the development of planned development area in the shoreland district (Sec. 129-195/129-387). A conditional use is defined in the Zoning Code as a use that requires the approval and issuance of a conditional use permit. The intent is that through the conditional use permit the City establishes the conditions that the development should meet to ensure that it fits its location. As noted above, the development is proposed as a planned development area (PDA). A PDA is similar to a planned unit development (PUD) that is used in the Pedestrian and Destination Districts, however, it is only applied to residential districts. Similar to the PUD district, the Code states that the applicant shall request a conditional use permit which authorizes the completion of the project according to the plan. The applicant has met the requirement that the PDA be at least one acre in size. Use (Sec. 129-99) Section 129-199 lists permitted, conditional and accessory uses for residential districts. The proposed townhouses are listed as a conditional use. Lot Size and Site Plan (Sec. 129-103) This site size meets one (1) acre minimum required size for a PDA. The applicant is proposing that the PDA allow for 18 units on a 1.26 acres (54,958 sq. ft) site. The applicant has shown on the site plan that the buildings will all be set back 30 feet from the roadways and 20 feet from the side lot lines. As there is a street on the north and south sides of the property, there is not a rear lot line. Building Height (Sec. 129-139) The maximum height of a building in the R-3 District is 35 feet for a residential structure. While the individual structures may have differing building heights based on the City's definition for building height, all will be required to be under 35 feet. Each structure will be individually evaluated at the time of building permit submittal for conformity with the height requirements. Unit Size (Sec. 129-199) The City has established minimum unit sizes for its residential developments. All of the two - bedroom townhome units are 1,382 square feet in size, which is larger than the required 880 square feet. The applicant is requesting that the PDA provide for the one ADA unit to be 708 square feet in size. This unit is smaller than typical as it can only extend across one floor. `71"123' Site Suitability (Section 129-387) As part of its shoreland regulations, City Code requires projects to be evaluated for density. As with sites in the downtown, this evaluation is a difficult provision to comply with for any type of residential housing project other than single family as the density evaluation is based on the single family lot size of 10,000 square feet. This evaluation shows an appropriate density of 15 single family lots. The PDA would establish that the proposed 18 units is appropriate as it is not a direct lakeshore property and is located more than 400 feet from the 929.4 OHWM and physically separated from the lake by both improved roads/streets and properties. Open Space (Section 129-387) As required by the shoreland planned development area, 50%of the site is proposed to be open space. Parkin¢. Access and Circulation (Section 129-103 and 129-323) Access The development site is accessed from a driveway on Wilshire Boulevard and a driveway from Tuxedo Boulevard. Parking The R-3 zoning district requires at least two parking spaces per unit, of which at least one shall be indoors. The applicant is proposing two garage spaces for each of the two bedroom units. The ADA unit will have one oversized garage stall. The applicant is also proposing nine (9) guest parking spaces Landscaping (Sec. 129-317) The proposed landscape plan that has been reviewed by the City's consulting Landscape Architect and found to meet best practices. The landscape plan shows that the existing trees on the west side of the lot will be retained to provide screening. The applicant is proposing to install 22 new overstory trees, 10 new ornamental trees, and a wide range of shrubs and perennials. Glare (Sec. 129-139) The proposed lighting plan generally focuses new lights on the interior of the site with only two lights near the property entrances. `71"124' Utilities 1. Public water and sanitary sewer utilities have already been established for the site. 2. The MCES SAC charge for the project shall be determined as part of final plat which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. A MCES Sewer Availability Charge determination letter shall be provided by the applicant. 3. Sewer and watermain area trunk charges for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat. The current trunk charge for sewer and water, per unit, are $2000.00 each. 4. Sewer connection and water connection fees shall be determined as part of the final plat. The current sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. Stormwater The applicant is requesting the PDA establish the impervious surface coverage for the site at 50%. Stormwater management will be reviewed and approved by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). There is existing impervious surface located below the surface of the site from its previous use as a restaurant and bar. The redevelopment of the site will reduce the amount of impervious surface, though the amount of reduction is currently under discussion between the applicant and MCWD. This determination will influence the final stormwater management facilities required for the site. Given that the site has 50% open space, it is expected that any required facilities can be accommodated. Park Dedication As provided by City Code Sec. 121-121, a park dedication fee, in lieu of land dedication is recommended by Staff. The required park dedication amount shall be determined as part of the final plat. The code requires the submittal of 10%fee for park fee dedication. For the purpose of calculating park dedication, the City will use the current market value of the land as determined by Hennepin County. Si¢na¢e The applicant has shown a proposed monument sign location on the northeast corner of the site. No additional details about the sign have been provided at this time. The sign will need to meet sign requirements of Chapter 119 and be located out of site lines. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff's recommendation for each application of the Villages of Island Park submittal package is provided below. Please note that the conditions proposed are preliminary and subject to change as review and discussion of the development project continues. `71"123' Rezoning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the rezoning from B-2 General Business District to R-3 Multiple -Family Residential. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Mound 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a townhouse use and a shoreland planned development area with the following conditions: 1. The building materials and color scheme shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City. 2. The site plan shall be revised and approved by the Fire Department to eliminate the turning radius issue for a 78-foot ladder truck. 3. No parking shall be allowed on either of the access roads to the development. 4. The grading plan shall be revised to regrade along Wilshire Boulevard to establish a proper drainage ditch under the proposed driveway access. 5. The landscape plan shall be revised to show Black Hills Spruce under "Evergreen Trees" rather than "Ornamental" and add Techny Arborvitae to "Evergreen Trees" rather than "Shrubs." 6. Concurrent approval of the rezoning and major subdivision -preliminary plat applications. 7. This conditional use permit is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: (to be inserted). 8. A Development Agreement, to be prepared by the City Attorney, shall be required for the project and prepared as part of the final plat. 9. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the conditional use permit application. 10. The applicant shall be responsible for securing all required local, state, and federal permits and approvals. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 12. Additional conditions from Staff, the Planning Commission, and City Council. `71"1q3' This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use of the site is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. 3. The proposed development is providing adequate utilities and drainage. 4. The proposed development has sufficiently considered access and traffic. 5. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. 6. The proposed project will diversify the types of housing available in the community by providing 18 new townhouse units for the City. Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the preliminary plat, as submitted, with the following conditions: 1. 10-foot drainage and utility easements shall be established around the perimeter of the property. 2. Concurrent approval of the rezoning and conditional use permit applications. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolutions(s) with Hennepin County. Applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 6. The MCES SAC charge for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 7. Sewer and watermain area trunk charges for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat. The current trunk charge for sewer and water, per unit, is $2000.00 each. 8. Sewer connection and water connection fees shall be determined as part of the final plat. The 2020 sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. 9. The park dedication fee amount shall be determined as part of the final plat as provided `71"127' by City Code Sec. 121.121. 10. A development agreement shall be prepared as part of the final plat process. 11. Additional conditions from Staff, the Planning Commission and City Council. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed major subdivision -preliminary plat is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. 3. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that the requests will be considered by the City Council at their March 9tn meeting. Public hearings are required for the rezoning, conditional use permit, and major subdivision/preliminary plat. `71"128' © L I Judsdi ai onal Boundary Date: 129/2021 Source City of Mound & 0 50 100 200 300 400 Hennepin County Assessor Feet lam) Site Location Map Crry n� `IM29' Intent The Wilshire -Tuxedo Gateway is located just southwest of where the two main roadways intersect in Mound's island neighborhood. While there has been a commercial business operating at the intersection for many years, interest in additional commercial in this area has been limited. Mixed use is proposed to provide additional flexibility in developing this site for residential or commercial uses. Considerations Mix of uses to provide flexibility in development of area Topography on site will affect site design options Small area of land lends itself to townhomes or other smaller multifamily options Access and circulation design should consider safety on Wilshire and Tuxedo Building design should seek to fit into the residential neighborhood through elements such as individual entrances, porches, or patios/small entrance yards. Acreage (gross) 1.28 Redevelopment area (net) 1.28 • Residential 85 % • Commercial 15 % Residential Unit Townhomes, Types Multifamily Residential Densities 7 -15 units/ acre 40 Mound Comprehensive Plan 12040 WMA January 2020 HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA January 28, 2021 Ms. Sarah Smith Community Development Director, City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Re: Preliminary Plat Review —Villages of Island Park (Received 01/06/21) County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 125 (Wilshire Boulevard) at Tuxedo Boulevard Hennepin County Plat Review ID #3879C (Reviewed 01/12121) Ms. Smith: Please consider the following county comments of this final plat proposal consolidating two vacant parcels (1.26 acres) to develop 18 residential townhomes. Access: Pending confirmation of sufficient sight distance, we accept the proposed driveway on Wilshire Boulevard. We request the city consider access easement dedication between this site and 4400 Tuxedo Boulevard to allow for future access closure next to the Tuxedo Boulevard/Wilshire Boulevard intersection with future redevelopment. Right-of-way: No right-of-way is requested. However, we recommend the city pursue a 10-foot drainage and utility easement around the site perimeter to establish proper ditch drainage. Storm Water / Drainage: We request the developer regrade along Wilshire Boulevard to establish a proper drainage ditch under the proposed access. The county storm water system will not take water from new drainage areas. The site needs to internally capture any additional stormwater runoff. Additional treatment may be needed if flow rates cannot match existing. Contact: Drew McGovern of 672-596-0208 or drew. mcaovern @hennepin. us Permits: Please inform the developer that all construction within county right-of-way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact: Michael Olmstead, Permits Coordinator of 672-596-0336 or michoel.olmsteod@hennepin.us Please contact Jason Gottfried. 672-596-0394, iason.aottfried@hennepin.us for further discussion. Sincerely, Q Carla Stueve, PE, PTOE County Highway Engineer Ei' ASS \ 2 OMAi�e�T S L 0 Ln r CD N N Lo cN 0 z LEGAL DESCRIFMN All of Lots 3 though 18 except therefrom the following: The Southeasterly 30 feet of Lot 3; the Southeasterly 30 feet of Lot 4; the Southeasterly 30 feet and the Northwesterly 35 feet of the Southwesterly 5 feet of Lot 5; the southeasterly 30 feet and the Northwesterly 35 feet of Lot 6; the Southeasterly 30 feet and the Northwesterly 35 feet of Lot 7; the Southeasterly 30 o feet and the Northeasterly 15 feet of the Northwesterly 22 feet of Lot 8; the Southeasterly 30 feet of Lot 9; the Northeasterly \ 15 feet of Lots 10 and 11; the Southeasterly 67 feet of Lot 14; the Southeasterly 67 feet and that part of the Northeasterly 20 \ feet lying Northwesterly of the Southeasterly 67 feet of Lot 15 and the Southeasterly 5 feet of Lot 16. Mq okFG V All in Block 8, AVALON \ (Torrens Certificate No. 737156) D \ AND \ The Northwesterly 35 feet of the Southwesterly 5 feet of Lot 5; The Northwesterly 35 feet of Lot 6; \ The Northwesterly 35 feet of Lot 7; The Northeasterly 15 feet of the Northwesterly 22 feet of Lot 8; \ The Northeasterly 15 feet of Lots 10 and 11; \ The Southeasterly 67 feet of Lot 14; The Southeasterly 67 feet and that part of the Northeasterly 20 feet lying Northwesterly of the Southeasterly 67 feet of Lot 5; \ The Southeasterly 5 feet of Lot 16, Q \ All in Block 8, AVALON \ (Torrens Certificate No. 781022) Oo \ \ N29'34'38"E 53.00' Q \ BLOCK 1 \q \ '�eox S 9 \ \ / 0 Ln o 4 2g W 302 00 O aox c0 ccl N III N L�G� CN ln CC) e �D z n s� N29'34'3-8°zi -5 00' 0 Ln L - N � / 721 1 e $ �Gg � o 0 s---------------- ss� O PVC 1 OUTLOT A N29"34'39"E 103.97' \Ln rn w la \ 1 B LOC K 2 . c S29°34'39"W 103.97' II ------------- ----------------------------- N29°34'38"E 122.50' — — —-4—S2:34'38"W 90.80' 1 r, "22'24"W 122.50' N29°22'24"E 287.70' G G G 2 N29°22'2�" E 90.88 c c G G— 27.9 x 0 m 962.81 -4- E -------------------------------------- 1-------------------- 1- 1- L--------------------L---------- Q------------I _____--�o-------_____________________________________ Z� 8" PVC 8" PVC 8" PVC El 9� so PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC 31-1-1 3,312 0.08 31-1-2 3,577 0.08 32-11 5,510 0.13 33-11 6,829 0.16 33-12 5,029 0.12 OUTLOT A 30,700 0.70 TOTAL 54,959 1.26 LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE — — — R.O.W EASEMENT LINE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT Know what's below. Call before you dig. Dial 811 EN4\0 oN�Nn� �I V vq N�� F 2 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com 1.� a z J QH J U) a L O Q cn z a Q o J J ? W > a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA CLARK WICKLUND, PE 40922 Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 01-04-21 ICITY CUP SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DMS DRAWN: GL PROJECT NO: 220-0137 4 SHEET 4 of 11 <> SITE PLAN DATA LAND USE AND ZONING: AREA DATA: AREA: 1.262 AC EXISTING ZONING: TOTAL LOTS PROPOSED: 6 1.262 AC * 15 UNITS/AC = 18.93 UNITS B-2, GENERAL BUSINESS PROPOSED UNITS: 18 UNITS 'ROPOSED ZONING: R-3 PDA, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA OO a" PVC �A IMPERVIOUS AREA: TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 27,502 SF SITE AREA: 54,958 SF 1.262 AC % IMPERVIOUS: 50.0% DENSITY CALCULATION: PERMITTED UNITS/ACRE: 15 UNITS/AC Mq��sc � kFs PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA SHORELAND TIER DENSITY EXHIBIT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA SHORELAND TIER DENSITY CALCULATIONS: I iN-�� LAKE MINNETONKA LAKE MINNETONKA (BLACK LAKE) �� `� > ;�� o �'� 1 �' ; ' (BLACK LAKE) SUITABLE AREA WITHIN TIER 2 (BL2): _ 14,822 SF / 10,000 SF * 2 (100% INCREASE) = 2.96 UNITS SUITABLE AREA WITHIN TIER 3 (BL3): Aj A `V 2` 40,136 SF / 10,000 SF * 3 (200% INCREASE) = 12.04 UNITS TOTAL UNITS = 15.00 UNITS OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: 50% �`� �� - 3 31_31 < ' PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 27,456 SF -F+-TL xz SITE AREA: 54,958 SF 1.262 AC ---- -- -- ---- -� F — — — � %OPEN SPACE: 50.0% Imo"Q \\ `\ ; I I % .vss-------------------i__--_------------------ ' TUXEDO BOULEVARD Yl 0 e^ PVC e" PVC LAKE MINNETONKA (SPRING PARK BAY) 3 2, 2 0 250 500 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. Dial 811 SITE LEGEND B612 CURB & GUTTER EXISTING CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT EXISTING PROPERTY LINE Z 0 IO 20 40 SCALE IN FEET ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Fa a w H a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA CLARK WICKLUND, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 01-04-21 FCITY CUP SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: DMS DRAWN: DMS PROJECT NO: 220-0137 9 SHEET 5 of 11 M1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ADDENDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consultant Planner DATE: March 18, 2021 SUBJECT: Request for Substantially Similar Use Determination APPLICANT: Dane Vocelka OWNERS: Samuel C. & Shea F. Steadman LOCATION: West Tenant Space in Lost Lake Commercial Building Addressed as 5439 Shoreline Drive (PID No. 13-117124-34-0132) MEETING DATE: March 23, 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed Use ZONING: Pedestrian Planned Unit Development District City Council members are requested to bring their March 9'^ City Council packets to the meeting as background information from that packet has not been reinserted. Alternately, members may individually contact Staff and request an electronic copy of the report and support materials related to this request be forwarded by email. Review Summary and Overview Dane Vocelka submitted a written request for evaluation of a proposed tattoo studio use at 5439 Shoreline Drive in City of Mound, as provided in City Code Sec. 129-171, that the use is "substantially similar" to the list of uses included in the Pedestrian Planned Unit District (PUD) zoning regulations contained in Mound City Code Sec. 129-139. The Planning Commission considered the request at their February 2, 2021 meeting and made a recommendation to the City Council that the use be determined to be substantially similar to retail sales and services. The request was then presented to the City Council on March 9, 2021. As requested by members of the adjacent residential properties, the City Council tabled the request to its March 23, 2021 meeting to allow further time for their review and comment. Supplemental Information Informationfrom Applicant Additional information was received from the applicant on March 18, 2021. It has been included in the packet for your reference. Meeting with the Villas Homeowners Association (HOA) On March 17, 2021 City Staff met with representatives of the Villas Homeowners Association (HOA). The HOA expressed concern about the use and provided their perspective that they feel the use should be determined an adult use rather than retail sales and services. Additional information received from the HOA on March 18, 2021 has been included. Staff Determination of Adult Use In response to the inquiry of the Villas Home Owners Association about whether the proposed use should be classified as an adult use, Staff has reviewed City Code and State Statutes. As a result of this review, Staff would recommend that a tattoo studio not be determined to be an adult use. This conclusion is based on the following information: Minnesota Statute Requirements for Body Art Establishments Minnesota primarily regulates body art establishments through Minnesota Statutes Chapter 146B. As can be seen in the following definitions from Section 14613.01, tattooing is included as a body art procedure: • Subd. 4.13ody art; body art procedures. "Body art" or "body art procedures" means physical body adornment using, but not limited to, tattooing and body piercing. Body art does not include practices and procedures that are performed by a licensed medical or dental professional if the procedure is within the professional's scope of practice. • Subd. 5. Body art establishment; establishment. "Body art establishment" or "establishment" means any structure or venue, whether permanent, temporary, or mobile, where body art is performed. Mobile establishments include vehicle - mounted units, either motorized or trailered, and readily moveable without dissembling and where body art procedures are regularly performed in more than one geographic location. • Subd. 30. Tattooing. "Tattooing" means any method of placing indelible ink or other pigments into or under the skin or mucosa with needles or any other instruments used to puncture the skin, resulting in permanent coloration of the skin or mucosa. Tattooing also includes micropigmentation and cosmetic tattooing. In these sections, the State of Minnesota outlines requirements for licensure, health and safety standards, professional standards, fees, and procedures and grounds for disciplinary action. State Statutes do not specifically indicate or limit where a body art establishment can be located. Nor does it specifically indicate that those under age 18 cannot be present within a tattoo establishment. In addition, it should be noted that statute provisions do allow a body art establishment to be located within a private residence and to occur as part of a temporary body art event with no locational restrictions. Staff does note that Section 14613.09 does state that county and municipalities can establish additional requirements related to land use, building, Wigo construction requirement, nuisance control, and licensing. At this time City Code does not have specific provisions regarding body art establishments. Information about Adult Uses The determination of what is an adult use and the regulation of adult uses requires careful consideration as it is considered protected by the First Amendment and there have been a number of legal challenges regarding community regulations of adult uses. In general, while communities can regulate these types of businesses to minimize negative impacts, they cannot be outrightly prohibited. Adult use regulation at the state level primarily is found in Minnesota Statutes 617.242, which pertains to adult entertainment establishments. While these provisions do not provide specific direction to the use determination, Staff does not think that the provisions define adult entertainment establishments as those that are only open to adults and reference that the performances are distinguished by and characterized by an emphasis on the depiction of sexual conduct or nudity. As with body art, the statute does allow communities to establish regulations that are the same or more restrictive. The City of Mound's adult establishment regulations are in Sections 129-266 to 129-272 of the Zoning Code. The regulations include 15 separate use definitions, none of which specifically use the word tattoo. The general definition for adult establishment is provided below for reference: Adult establishment means any business that devotes a substantial or significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, or publicly displayed merchandise, or devotes a substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms, basements, or any portion of the business not open to the public) to, or derives a substantial or significant portion of its gross revenues from, items, merchandise, devices or other materials distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on material depicting, exposing, simulating, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas; or any business that engages in any adult use as defined in this division. In discussions, reference has been made to the term adult body painting, however, Staff notes that the act of tattooing involves more than just applying paint, ink or other substance to a person's body, which is why tattoo artists are licensed and have health and safety procedures that must be followed. In reviewing the City's ordinances, Staff also notes that there are number of operational requirements in Section 129-272 that would typically not be applied to a tattoo studio but would be generally deemed appropriate for an adult use. These include a requirement for window treatment that prevents viewing of the interior of an adult Em establishment by those outside. There is also a requirement that states that no minor may be permitted within the establishment. Staff also did a general review of the location of tattoo studios relative to residential areas in other communities. This review found multiple examples of where tattoo studios were located adjacent to, behind, or around the corner from residential homes. Staff also found an example of a tattoo artist that offered services within their home. Staff Review and Recommendation After its review of state statutes and city code, Staff would recommend that the City Council not deem a tattoo studio as an adult use. Further, staff's evaluation continues to be that the proposed commercial service use (tattoo studio) is substantially similar to the current category of "retail sales and services", which is a permitted use in the PED-PUD Pedestrian Planned Unit Development District. This evaluation is based on the following findings: 1. A tattoo studio provides a personal service to a customer and is commonly found in commercial areas. 2. Business activities include over the counter retail sales of art items and apparel. 3. The middle tenant in the Lost Lake commercial building is a dry cleaner which also provides personal services to customers. 60-Day Land Use Application Review Process Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. On February 25, 2021, the City of Mound executed an extension for 60-days for Council action on the request. With the City's extension, the deadline for action on the request is on or around April 28, 2021. M' M RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION NO. 21-_REGARDING SUBSTANTIAL USE DETERMINATION FOR PROPERTY AT 5439 SHORELINE DRIVE IN LOST LAKE COMMERCIAL BUIDING WHEREAS, the applicant, Dane Vocelka, on December 29, 2020, submitted a written request for evaluation of a proposed tattoo studio use at 5439 Shoreline Drive in City of Mound, as provided in City Code Sec. 129-71, that the use is "substantially similar" to the list of uses included in the Pedestrian Planned Unit District (PUD) zoning regulations contained in Mound City Code Sec. 129-139. Mr. Vocelka has signed a letter of intent with for the tenant space and provided a copy to the City; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted supporting information to help outline the proposed studio and proposed business operation and also provided proposed concepts for the building interior along with the written request; and WHEREAS, the subject property is commonly known in Mound as the Lost Lake or Caribou building. The original Lost Lake project was approved by Conditional Use Permit that established the Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, details regarding the substantial use request from the applicant are contained in the Planning Report dated January 29, 2021 for the February 2, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, the February 2, 2021 Planning Commission meeting minutes, the Executive Summary Report dated March 4, 2021 for the March 9, 2021 City Council meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant, and WHEREAS, Staff's evaluation was that the requested use from the is substantially similar to the "retail sales and services" category in the Pedestrian Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, the request from the applicant was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its February 2, 2021 meeting. The Planning Commission unanimously voted that the proposed use from the applicant is substantially similar to the "retail sales and services" category in the Pedestrian Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. On GSA February 25, 2021 the City of Mound executed an extension for 60-days for Council action on the request. With the City's extension, the deadline for action on the request is on or around April 28, 2021. Therefore, the City Council's decision on the application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the substantial use determination that the tattoo studio use is substantially similar to the current category of "retail sales and services" in the PED-PUD Pedestrian Planned Unit Development District based on the following findings: 1. A tattoo studio provides a personal service to a customer and is commonly found in commercial areas. 2. Business activities include over the counter retail sales of art items and apparel. 3. The middle tenant in the Lost Lake commercial building is a dry cleaner which also provides personal services to customers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the substantial use determination and does incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above to allow the tattoo studio use in the tenant space in the Lost Lake commercial building located a 5439 Shoreline Drive located in the Pedestrian -Planned Unit Development District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, the City Council's approval of the request is based on information contained in the record including but not limited to, the applicant's request and submitted information, the Planning Report, the Planning Commission's review and recommendation and the Executive Summary Report. Adopted by the City Council this 9th of March, 2021. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar %"I From: Dane Vocelka Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 10:05 PM To: Sarah Smith Subject: Re: Upcoming March 23, 2021 City Council Meeting - Substantial Use Evaluation Sarah, I would like to touch on the following topics and personally describe at the meeting what they are and how they operate: Vocelka Fishing and Customs Guide Service - Where does this business take place? - Where do the transactions take place? - Where do you meet the clients? - How can they book a trip with me and fellow anglers? 2 - Vocelka Fishing Custom Rods - Where does this business take place? - Where do the transactions take place? - Where do you meet the clients? 3 - The Harbor Tattoo Studio - Where does this business take place? - Where do the transactions take place? - Where do you meet the clients? - Where and how is the act performed? - This studio "The Harbor Tattoo Studio" is a high end, art gallery that performs the art of tattooing - This business is substantially similar to others in the PED district because of the following: 1. A tattoo studio provides a personal service to a customer and is commonly found in commercial areas. 2. Business activities include over the counter retail sales of art items, fishing rods and apparel. 3. The middle tenant in the Lost Lake commercial building is a dry cleaner which also provides personal services to customers. All of my additional comments in regards to the concerns will be voiced at the meeting on Tuesday (with detailed response). I am assuming the other information from prior agenda packets will be on there as they have been in the past. Thank you again for everything you have done these past few month, <"2f> DIVISION 3. ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS' -State law reference —Adult entertainment establishments, Mina Suits. ¢ 617.242. Subdivision L In General Sec. 129-266. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this division, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Adult establishment means: (1) Any business that devotes a substantial or significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, or publicly displayed merchandise, or devotes a substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms, basements, or any portion of the business not open to the public) to, or derives a substantial or significant portion of its gross revenues from, items, merchandise, devices or other materials distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on material depicting, exposing, simulating, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas; or (2) Any business that engages in any adult use as defined in this division Adult use means any of the activities and businesses described in this definition. (1) Adult body painting studio means an establishment or business that provides the service of applying paint, ink, or other substance, whether transparent or nontransparent, to the body of a patron when the person is nude. (2) Adult bookstore means an establishment or business used for the barter, rental, or sale of items consisting of printed matter, pictures, slides, records, audio tapes, videotapes, movies, DVDs or motion picture films if a substantial or significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, or publicly displayed merchandise consists of, or if a substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms, basements, or any portion of the business not open to the public) is devoted to, or if substantial or significant portion of its gross revenues is derived from items, merchandise, devices or materials that are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on material depicting, exposing, simulating, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (3) Adult cabaret means a business or establishment that provides dancing or other live entertainment distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on: a. The depiction of nudity, specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas; or b. The presentation, display, or depiction of matter that seeks to evoke, amuse, or excite sexual or erotic feelings or desire. < > b. The presentation, display, or depiction of matter that seeks to evoke, arouse, or excite sexual or erotic feelings or desire. 129:73 ZONING (4) Adult companionship establishment means a business or establishment that provides the service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk, or discussion distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (5) Adult conversation/rap parlor means a business or establishment that provides the services of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk, or discussion distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (6) Adult healthIsport club means a health/sport club that is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (7) Adult hotel or motel means a hotel or motel that presents material distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (8) Adult massage parlorlhealth club means a massage parlor or health club that provides massage services distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (9) Adult minimotion picture theater means a business or establishment with a capacity of less than 50 persons that as a prevailing practice presents on -premises viewing of movies, motion pictures, or other material distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (10) Adult modeling studio means a business or establishment that provides live models who, with the intent of providing sexual stimulation in sexual gratification, engage in specified sexual activities or display specified anatomical areas while being observed, painted, painted upon, sketched, drawn, sculptured, photographed, or otherwise depicted. (11) Adult motion picture arcade means any place to which the public is perndtted or invited where coin- or slug -operated or electronically, electrically, or mechanically controlled or operated still or motion picture machines, projectors, or other image -producing devices are used to show images to five or fewer persons per machine at any one time, and where the images so displayed are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on depicting or describing specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (12) Adult motion picture theater means a motion picture theater with a capacity of 50 or more persons that as a prevailing practice presents material distinguished in characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas for observation by patrons. (13) Adult novelty business means an establishment or business that devotes a substantial or significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, or publicly displayed merchandise or devotes a substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms, basements, or any portion of the business not open to the public) to, or derives a substantial or significant portion of its gross revenues from items, merchandise, or devices that me distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on material depicting or describing specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas, or items, merchandise or devices that simulate specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas, or are designed for sexual stimulation. (14) Adult sauna means a sauna that excludes minors by reason of age, and that provides a steam bath or heat bathing room used for the purpose of bathing, relaxation, or reducing, if the service provided by the sauna is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (15) Adult steam room/bathhouse facility means a building or portion of a building used for providing a steam bath or heat bathing room used for the purpose of pleasure, bathing, 129:74 (13) Adult novelty business means an establishment or business that devotes a substantial or significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, or publicly displayed merchandise or devotes a substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms, basements, or any portion of the business not open to the public) to, or derives a substantial or significant portion of its gross revenues from items, merchandise, or devices that are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on material depicting or describing specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas, or items, merchandise or devices that simulate specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas, or are designed for sexual stimulation. (14) Adult sauna means a sauna that excludes minors by reason of age, and that provides a steam bath or heat bathing room used for the purpose of bathing, relaxation, or reducing, if the service provided by the sauna is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. (15) Adult steam roomabathhouse facility means a building or portion of a building used for providing a steam bath or heat bathing room used for the purpose of pleasure, bathing, 129:74 ZONING relaxation, or reducing, if the building or portion of a building restricts minors by reason of age and if the service provided by the steam room/bathhouse facility is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. Sec. 129-270. I.oatian. (a) Perxbned use. Adult establishments are permitted uses in do B-1 central business district, the PED pedestrian planned unit development district and the I -I light industrial district (b) R"otraiomv. (1) An adult establishment must be located at (cast 200 radial feet, as nnasurcd in a straight line from the closest point of the proposed adult establishment strucmrc to the property line of any: a. Reaideotial property; b. School; c. Church or place of w orship; d. Cu"srod facility; c. Park or recreational property; C Child day care faci etY, g. Adult catellislmxnt. (2) IF the punpo,ed adult cstabluhmanL is located u, noWwmanl boilding, the nment described in nulx.U.. (b)(]) ul'Ihis e,don ah a be Luken Bum Ihn oeareaL point ul'the positron or the building wham the adrJL eslabbxmncrat is located. (3) An apptrcant for an adult cauddihncnt liccoac Host demonstrate m the ary that the loeatimn hica u ements in Oils section have ban met. (Cod,19V, ¢ 3SO, t415; Ord Nu 11.2003, 127-2003) lz �9SL` THE- Ofts"m H A R B T ORB T A T T 0 0 S U D 1 0 mi lyff� V-_ w d0l mm �'� � � . �. �ff�: F �`` ,_ �.� .� i r .Y. Body Art Business (Tattoo / Piercings) Legal Standing for Location Objections Regulatory & Zoning Provisions Position of Lost Lake Villas • Primary Partners in Mound's Harbor Development District • Invested in what City said would be Upscale / Luxury Residential neighborhood • Primary retirement homes for our community • Share a common entrance, driveway and exit with Applicant's location • Proposed Location is the first visible thing seen upon entering our d riveway -r4t> Lost Lake Villas Strongly Opposes Proposa • Adult Establishments Must 200' from any residence • Mound Code defines all tattoo parlors as Adult Businesses • All neighboring cities do the same • Board of Directors has unanimously voted to strenuously oppose this request • If the City fails to adhere to it's original development plans and permits an Adult Establishment at this location Lost Lake Villas will defend their property values in court • City Code does not permit the location of that business here and there has been absolutely no showing of any legal basis or necessity for locating this business here -r42,t> Offer to Assist Applicant • Lost Lake Villas supports this applicant's request for City permit • We will work to assist in finding other locations for him • We simply oppose locating this business in our front yard in violation of City Code and the original development intent. -M22> What Laws Control Tattoo Body Art • Minnesota State Law covers all Body Art work (Tattoo, Piercings ...) • City Ordinances provide additional regulations • Minnesota State Statutes define as "Adult Businesses" • Parental Consent is even overridden. No person under 18 even with parental presence and consent. • City Ordinances may be more strict but cannot "soften" this definition • Only one license exists for all Body Art business (no distinction between "adult" tattoos and other tattoos) • Every MN city ordinance treats them as Adult Establishments 543> City Ordinances have followed state studies • Mound City Code • Follows MN law and similar City Ordinances • Defines Body Art (Tattoo/Piercing) as Adult Establishment • City Code Sec. 129-266 (1) • It Equates Tattoo shops to ... • Adult Bookstores • Adult Video • Adult Appliances / Novelties • Adult Dancing / Shows • Code lists over a half dozen more Adult Only businesses in same category as Tattoos • It specifically DOES NOT equate tattoos with hair and nail salons. r44> There are special additional limits for "Adult" • For all defined "Adult" only business Code places additional restrictions: • Hours of Operation, Strict Signage and visibility limits, etc. • Location exclusions • Mound says Adult establishments must be 200' (straight line) from residential property border • More than 20 of our 27 homes are within 200' • This Can't Be Waived by City. It would require an amendment to the City Code removing that distance requirement. -r423> All other neighboring cities are the same • All Hennepin County city ordinances are similar to Mound's • All treat Tattoo parlors as Adult establishments. • None of them have a "De minimus" exception • "Only partime" • Only do "Family Friendly Tattoos" • Won't Tattoo private parts (breasts, pelvis, buttocks) • Any kind of Tattoo business is defined as an adult business. All Tattoo parlors are regulated as Adult Business • Throughout the cities of West Hennepin County, all Tattoo parlors are treated as Adult Establishments • No Cities have created a non -adult business exception for non -adult tattoos which may be located within residential zones or otherwise within 250' of a residence • The Codes are interpreted that if the license permits the artist to apply tattoos to nude or partially nude patrons, its is an adult establishment. • Not a single example of where a tattoo parlor can locate within 200' of a personal residence. r427> Example City Codes with Substantially Similar codes that actually have located Tattoo Shops • Excelsior • Golden Valley • Eden Prairie • Brooklyn Center • Shakopee (Also requires Police Department Review as "Adult") • Chaska ("If it excludes minors by state law, it is an adult establishment") • ALL OF THE ABOVE TREAT TATTOO PARLORS AS "ADULT" • ALL OF THE ABOVE MUST LOCATE 200 OR MORE FEET FROM ANY HOME _E Examples of Neighboring Cities Tattoo Regs • Wayzata (Body art is an adult enterprise) • Orono (Sexually Oriented Businesses include Body Painting Studios applying tattoos to any area of the body) • Tonka Bay (Simply follows MN State statute that says all businesses prevented from serving persons 18 & under are "Adult Uses" • EACH OF THESE CITIES MANDATE TATTOO PARLORS MUST BE 200-500 FEET FROM ANY RESIDENCE -r429> Mound Has a 200' Limit - More than 20 of our Homes are closer than 200' Chrome me .an v.. x"mn eeexmelu weenie .ee weae. ell • �,YerAYmW,n,. x I > C"Cea«nrc,,X I — scl x o Cees,. Mena x v He,, - 0... NN, x I O ne.aan.3 w,. x I G.me,w,..a.x + c o Cee �em..,.,d 1'?44.935986.93.68e3737.33mme,-IlIle3,.mmema3.3 u> 9 M NSPECTLLC 235 First Street West • Waconia, MN 55387-1302 To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members From: Tracy Reimann, Code Official Date: March 18, 2021 Re: Hazardous structure at 3053 Brighton Blvd.(PID No. 24-117-24-43-0014) Summary At its Tuesday, March 23, 2021 meeting, the City Council will discuss unsafe property conditions at 3053 Brighton Boulevard which includes a vacant single-family home. According to the Hennepin County Property Information website, the property is owned by Gary A. Field. Background Provided below is a summary of property conditions and activities at 3053 Brighton Blvd.: • On September 28, 2020, at the request of Hennepin County Public Health Department, TyTurnquist and Tracy Reimann from Mnspect conducted a site inspection of 3053 Brighton Blvd. in Mound regarding hoarding and a potential uninhabitable structure. Significant storage throughout, obstructed means of egress, water damage, possible structural damage, and electrical hazards. Requested storage be removed for better evaluation of the structure. • On September 28, 2020, Inspection Report sent to Hennepin County Public Health Department with observations and recommendations. • On October 12, 2020, TyTurnquist and Tracy Reimann from Mnspect, conducted a status inspection in conjunction with the Hennepin County Public Health Department. Limited visibility of foundation walls, however it appears that portions of the foundation wall have failed, thus causing structural beams to pull away from supporting columns and framing. Portions of the dwelling lack an approved interior wall covering broken glazing, and chimney on interior of structure is cracked. Requested more storage be removed for better evaluation of the structure. • On October 12, 2020, Inspection Report sent to Hennepin County Public Health Department with observations and recommendations. • On November 19, 2020, Ty Turnquist and Tracy Reimann from Mnspect, conducted a final inspection in conjunction with the Hennepin County Public Health Department. Foundation appears to be failing throughout structure. Improper framing noted throughout lower level. Slab in basement shows significant cracks and heaving. Ceilings and walls throughout main level are significantly not level or plumb. Ceiling appears to be pulling awayfrom walls. Flooring in main level slopes downward. Chimney in kitchen appears to be pulling away from wall due to home movement. Water intrusion, missing wall coverings, broken glazing, and possible hazardous wiring. Recommendations prior to occupation include structural analysis by a licensed engineer. Property owner has option to repair or remove the structure. • On January 25, 2021, a letter was sent to the property owner and posted on -site declaringthe structure unsafe and a hazardous property. The certificate of occupancyfor this structure was revoked and cannot be occupied until a new certificate of occupancy is issued. Property owner was advised that a written plan be delivered to the City by February 5, 2021. Failure to do so will result in matter being brought before City Council with a recommendation that the structure be abated. • As of February 5, 2021, no written plan had been submitted to City. Owner Notification On February 16, 2021, the property owner was notified of the Tuesday, March 9, 2021 City Council meeting by certified mail (return receipt requested) and by regular mail. On February 25, 2021, the property owner was notified that the matter has been moved to Tuesday, March 23, 2021 by certified mail (return receipt requested) and by regular mail. The letter was also posted on -site. Requested City Council Action Due to the unsafe building condition and because there has not been significant activities or progress to remediate the building, I recommend the City Council proceed with a hazardous building action for the abatement of conditions at 3053 Brighton Boulevard. A draft resolution to authorize proceeding with the commencement of the hazardous building process has been prepared for Council consideration. If approved, the formal resolution and required documentation will be prepared by the City Attorney, in cooperation by Staff and the Building Official, in accordance with state statutes, to be brought back to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. Staff also recommends discussion with the owner or representative regarding the preparation and execution of a removal agreement as an alternative or means to address the current hazardous conditions. E RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE PROCEEDING WITH HAZARDOUS BUILDING ACTION FOR PROPERTY AT 3053 BRIGHTON BOULEVARD WHEREAS, there is a single family home located on the property at 3053 Brighton Boulevard ("Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, according to the Hennepin County Property Information website, the property is owned by Gary A. Fields; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is identified in the Hennepin County Property Tax System as PID No. 24-117-24-43-0014; and WHEREAS, the building addressed has been vacant and unmaintained for many years; WHEREAS, on September 28, 2020, at the request of Hennepin County Public Health Department, Ty Turnquist and Tracy Reimann from MnSpect conducted a site inspection of 3053 Brighton Blvd. in Mound regarding hoarding and a potential uninhabitable structure. Significant storage, obstructed means of egress, water damage, possible structural damage, and electrical hazards were observed throughout the structure. MnSpect requested storage be removed for better evaluation of the structure; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2020, the Inspection Report was sent to Hennepin County Public Health Department with observations and recommendations; and WHEREAS, on October 12, 2020, Ty Turnquist and Tracy Reimann from MnSpect, conducted a status inspection in conjunction with the Hennepin County Public Health Department. There was limited visibility of foundation walls, however it appeared that portions of the foundation wall have failed, thus causing structural beams to pull away from supporting columns and framing. Portions of the dwelling also lack an approved interior wall covering, broken glazing, and the chimney on the interior of structure is cracked. MnSpect requested more storage be removed for better evaluation of the structure; and WHEREAS, on October 12, 2020, the Inspection Report was sent to Hennepin County Public Health Department with observations and recommendations; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2020, Ty Turnquist and Tracy Reimann from MnSpect, conducted a final inspection in conjunction with the Hennepin County Public Health Department. The foundation appears to be failing throughout the structure and improper framing noted throughout lower level. The slab in the basement showed significant cracks and heaving. Ceilings and walls throughout main level are significantly not level or plumb and the ceiling appeared to be pulling away from walls. The flooring in the main level slopes downward. The chimney in kitchen appeared to be pulling away from wall due to home movement. Water intrusion, missing wall coverings, broken glazing, and possible hazardous wiring were observed in the structure. MnSpect recommended that prior to any occupation, a structural analysis by a licensed engineer would be required. The property owner has option to repair or remove the structure following issuance of all required permits and information; and E . WHERAS, on January 25, 2021, a letter was sent to the property owner and posted on - site declaring the structure unsafe and a hazardous property. The certificate of occupancy for this structure was revoked and cannot be occupied until a new certificate of occupancy is issued. The property owner was advised that a written plan be delivered to the City by February 5, 2021 and that failure to do so would result in the matter being brought before City Council with a recommendation that the structure be abated; and WHEREAS, as of February 5, 2021, no written plan had been submitted to City; and WHEREAS, on February 16, 2021, the property owner was notified of the Tuesday, March 9, 2021 City Council meeting by certified mail with return receipt requested and regular mail. On February 25, 2021, the property owner was notified that the matter had been moved to Tuesday, March 23, 2021 City Council by certified mail with return receipt requested and regular mail. The letter was also posted on the property; and WHEREAS, despite attempts by the Building Official to facilitate a conclusion, there has not been significant progress to address the unsafe condition of the structure on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Building Official recommended to the City Council that the City of Mound proceed with a hazardous building action as provided by MN Rules, Chapter 1300.0180 which reads as follows: "All unsafe buildings, structures, or appendages are public nuisances and must be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition, or removal according to MN Statutes, sections 463.15 to 463.26." THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound hereby authorizes the City Attorney and Building Official to proceed with the preparation of all required documents to formerly commence a hazardous building action for abatement of conditions on the Subject Property, which is addressed as 3053 Brighton Boulevard, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, sections 463-415 to 463-26, to be brought back to an upcoming City Council meeting for consideration and action. Adopted by the City Council this 23'' of March, 2021. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar m 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD a MOUND, MN 55364-1668 ® PH: 952-472-0600 ° FAX: 952-472-0620 . fflWW.C11Y0FMQQND.00M Date: September 28, 2020 Time: 15:00-16:00 Address: 3053 Brighton Blvd., Mound, MN Inspector: Tracy Reimann Requested By: Andy Drilling (City of Mound) Met With: Joe Jurusik (Hennepin County), Officer Sturm (Orono Police), Ty Turnquist (MNSPECT), Andy Drilling, Jim Jackson, Zach Jackson, and Cheryl Schroeder The type of inspection conducted was visual in nature only. All Recommendations are based solely on my observations at the time of the inspection. Additional issues may be identified at later times. Observations: 1. Significant storage in all areas of structure, including basement. 2. Obstructed means of egress in most areas of structure. 3. Several areas on the ceilings indicate there has been water intrusion into the structure. 4. Possible structural damage — Wall between kitchen and dining area sagging. in the basement, the beam supporting that portion of the floor is cracked. Several beams were sistered with additional beams, but could not verify if adequate or properly supported. From the exterior, the rafters at the rear of the home were also sagging noticeable. 5. Possible electrical hazards —Temporary electrical wiring (extension cords) utilized throughout. Also, knob and tube wiring observed. Could not locate main electrical panel. 6. An older furnace is installed. 7. There is no clearance around the fuel fired appliances. Recommendations prior to habitation: 1. Remove excess personal belongings in order to better assess structural integrity of structure. 2. Repair areas damaged by water intrusion. 3. Verify electrical wiring is not hazardous. 4. Remove temporary wiring. S. Verify proper operation of the furnace. 6. Verify the furnace heat exchanger has not been compromised. 7. Ensure minimum clearances to combustible materials are maintained around fuel fired appliances. 8. Verify plumbing system is functional. (Water appears to be functional) EM ------------- 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD - MOUND, MN 55364-1668 ° PH: 952-472-0600 , FAX: 952-472-0620, WWW.CITYOFMOUND.COM Inspection Report Date: October 12, 2020 Time: 12:00 PM —1:00 PM Address: 3053 Brighton Blvd., Mound, MN Inspector: Tracy Reimann Requested By: Andy Drilling (City of Mound) Met With: Joe Jurusik (Hennepin County), Leah Larson (Hennepin County), Officer Sturm (Orono Police), Andy Drilling (City of Mound), Ty Turnquist (MNSPECT), and Zach Jackson The type of inspection conducted was visual in nature only. All recommendations are based solely on my observations at the time of the inspection. Additional issues may be identified at later times. Observations: 1. Interior foundation walls are obstructed from view except for the north wall. 2. Portions of the north foundation wall have failed causing the framing to slide off the foundation. The framing is noticeably deflecting out on the north side of the lower level. 3. The north wall foundation failure appears to be causing the beams to pull away from the supporting columns and framing. 4. The rear porch on the main level, appears to be pulling away from the main structure. Appears that the foundation wall may have failed. 5. The foundation on the west side of the structure by the entrance door appears to have failed. 6. Exposed poly and insulation in north bedroom. 7. Headers over exposed windows in the north bedroom are not properly supported to transfer the structural weight down to the floor/foundation. 8. Broken glazing. 9. Chimney on interior of structure is cracked. Recommendations prior to habitation: 1. Correct findings noted on September 28, 2020 inspection report. 2. Remove personal belongings around foundation to better assess structural integrity of the foundation. 3. Create a clear path to access the main electrical panel and water heater. 4. Window headers to be properly installed to transfer structural loads 5. Repair broken window glazing. 6. Poly shall be sealed and covered with an approved interior wall covering. 7. Repair chimney and verify flue is sound. 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD @ MOUND, MN 55364-1668 , PH: 952-472-0600 ° FAX: 952-472-0620 - MIMLW.QTY0FMOQND COM Date: November 19, 2020 Time: 14:00-15:00 Address: 3053 Brighton Blvd., Mound, MN Inspector: Tracy Reimann Requested By: Joe Jurusik (Hennepin County) Met With: Joe Jurusik (Hennepin County), Officer Sturm (Orono Police), Ty Turnquist (MNSPECT), Jim Jackson, and Cheryl Schroeder The type of inspection conducted was visual in nature only. All Recommendations are based solely on my observations at the time of the inspection. Additional issues may be identified at later times. Observations: 1. Foundation a. Foundation on the north wall appears to have failed, causing the framing to slide off the foundation. The wall framing is noticeably deflecting out on the north side of the lower level. b. Foundation on the north wall appears to be causing the beams to pull away from the supporting columns and framing. c. Foundation on east wall appears to be failing; significant cracking and bowing noted. Also, a portion of the foundation is missing which is open to the exterior. d. Foundation on the rear porch to the structure appears to have failed, causing wall to settle and pull away from structure. e. The foundation on the west side of the structure by the entrance door appears to have failed. f. Foundation on the south wall has large vertical cracks. 2. Framing a. Beam joints noted in lower level that do not bear on a column. b. Beams noted in lower level that do not bear on a structural member to transfer loads to the exterior foundation. c. Toenailed beams noted in lower level are pulling away from columns and rim board. d. Beams lap joints in lower level are not properly supported or secured. e. Beams in lower level are noticeably sagging, most notably near the east and west walls. f. Large crack in beam on lower level under kitchen area. g. A support column in lower level appears to be a tree trunk. EAM h. Headers over exposed windows in north bedroom on main level are not properly supported to transfer the structural weight down to the floor/foundation. I. From the exterior, the rafters at the rear of the home were also sagging noticeable. 3. Slab in basement shows significant cracking and heaving. 4. Ceilings and walls throughout main level are significantly not level or plumb due to supposed foundation failure. 5. Ceiling in kitchen area indicates wall movement as the ceiling appears to be pulling away from the walls. 6. Kitchen flooring and subfioor has separated and slopes downward due to the movement of the supporting structural members. 7. Wall between kitchen and bedroom shows signs of movement/settling. 8. The brick chimney in kitchen has separated from wall which appears to be a result of house movement. Vertical cracks in chimney noted in kitchen. 9. Several areas on the ceilings indicate there has been water intrusion into the structure. 10. Exposed poly and insulation in north bedroom. 11. Broken window glazing. 12. Knob and tube wiring noted in lower level. Evidence that the wire covering is breaking down. 13. The structure appears to be shifting toward the Northwest. Recommendations prior to habitation: 1. The apparent structural failures are based solely on my observations and would need to be reviewed by a licensed engineer to identify the failures. 2. There are two options available to the owner. a. Repair the structure b. Remove the structure 3. if repairing the structure and prior to habitation, we would require the following... a. A structural analysis be completed by a licensed engineer b. A permit application and plans reviewed, approved, and issued by the City. c. Work that ensures structural safety, life safety, and sanitation completed. d. Mechanical systems inspected and approved for use e. Plumbing system inspected and approved for use f. Electrical system inspected and approved for use 4. If removing the structure, no work may commence until application is made with the City and applicable permits have been issued. C: Andy Drilling, Field Officer (City of Mound) Municipal File Copy 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD . MOUND, MN 55364-1668 . PH: 952-472-0600 - FAX: 952-472-0620 - WWW.CITYOFM0UND.CQM January 25, 2021 SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL WITH RETURN RECEIPT, REGULAR MAIL AND POSTED ON -SITE. Mr. Gary A. Field Mr. Gary A. Field The Residence at North Ridge 3053 Brighton Blvd. and 5500 Boone Ave. N. #418 Mound, MN 55364 New Hope, MN 55428 Re: 3053 Brighton Blvd., Mound (Property ID 24-117-24-43-0014) Dear Mr. Field: This letter is in regards to the structure located at 3053 Brighton Boulevard, Mound. This property was inspected on several occasions, in conjunction with the Hennepin County Public Health Department. Enclosed are copies of all 3 Inspection Reports. The following violations of the Mound Property Maintenance Code are the responsibility of the Owner as stated in Section 301.2: Section 303.5 Foundation walls states "The foundation walls shall be maintained plumb and free from open cracks and breaks ...." Foundation wall north side appears to have failed; framing sliding off the foundation and deflecting on north side. Foundation on north wall appears to be causing the beams to pull away from supporting columns and framing. Foundation on east wall appears to be failing, significant cracking and bowing. Foundation on west side near door appears to have failed. The foundation on the south wall has large vertical cracks. Foundation to rear porch appears to have failed causing wall to settle and pull away from structure. Section 303.7 Roofs and drainage states "The roof and flashing shall be sound, tight and not have defects that admit rain." Several areas on the ceiling show evidence of water intrusion Section 303.11 Chimneys and towers states "All chimneys... shall be maintained structurally sound and safe, and in good repair. Chimney in kitchen appears to have separated from the wall, which appears to be the result of house movement. Vertical cracks in chimney in kitchen. Section 303.13.1 Glazing states "All glazing materials shall be maintained free from cracks and holes." Broken window glazing. EM Section 304.1, Interior structure, General states "The interior of a structure and equipment therein shall be maintained in good repair structurally sound, and in a sanitary condition." Concrete slab in lower level shows significant cracking and heaving. Ceilings and walls are not level or plumb, appears to be due to foundation movement. Kitchen flooring and subfloor appears to be pulling away due to failed foundation. Wall between kitchen and bedroom shows signs of movement/settling. Section 304.2, Structural members states "All structural members shall be maintained structurally sound, and be capable of supporting the imposed loads." Beams in lower level that do not bear over a column. Beams that do not bear on exterior foundation. Toenailed beams in lower level pulling away from columns and rim board. Beam lap joints in lower level not properly supported or secured. Beams in lower level noticeably sagging. Large crack in beam in lower level under kitchen. Support column appears to be a tree trunk. Headers over exposed windows are not properly supported to transfer weight to foundation. From the exterior, the roof rafters at the rear of the home are sagging noticeably. Section 304.3 Interior surfaces states "All interior surfaces, including windows and doors, shall be maintained in good, clean and sanitary condition. Peeling, chipping, flaking, or abraded paint shall be removed, and covered. Cracked or loose plaster, decayed wood, and other defective surface conditions shall be corrected." Evidence of water intrusion on ceiling and wall surfaces. Wall covering missing in north bedroom. Chipped and peeling paint noted. Section 504.1 Plumbing Systems and Fixtures, General states "All plumbing fixtures shall be properly installed and maintained in working order, and shall be kept free from obstructions, leaks and defects and be capable of performing the function for which such plumbing fixtures are designed. All plumbing fixtures shall be maintained safe, sanitary and functional." Unable to verify if plumbing systems and fixtures operable. Section 601.2 General states "The owner of the structure shall provide and maintain mechanical and electrical facilities and equipment in compliance with these requirements. A person shall not occupy as owner -occupant or permit another person to occupy any premises which does not comply with the requirements of this chapter." Unable to verify operation of heating facilities, mechanical equipment or electrical facilities. Section 604.3 Electrical system hazards states "Where it Is found that the electrical system in a structure constitutes a hazard to the occupants or the structure by reason of inadequate service, improper fusing, insufficient receptacle or lighting outlets, improper wiring or installation, deterioration or damage, or for similar reasons, the code official shall require the defects to be corrected to eliminate the hazard. Knob and tube wiring noted in lower level, evidence wire covering is breaking down. 0 1 .... Based on our findings, this structure is hereby declared unsafe to enter and therefore a hazardous property. Per Minnesota Statutes, section 463.15 Subd. 3 a "Hazardous building or hazardous property" means any building or property, which because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, physical damage, sanitary condition, or abandonment, constitutes afire hazard or a hazard to public safety or health." MN Rules, Chapter 1300.0180 provides that "all unsafe buildings, structures, or appendages are public nuisances and must be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition, or removal according to Minnesota Statutes, sections 463.15 to 463.26." - :yi This is no notify any and all parties concerned that the Certificate of Occupancy for this structure is hereby revoked per MN Rules, Chapter 1300.0220 Subpart 7. This property may not be occupied until such time as a new certificate of occupancy is issued. Section 107.5 of the 2000 International Property Maintenance Code states "it shall be unlawful for the owner of any dwelling of structure who has received a compliance order or upon whom a notice of violation has been served to sell, transfer, mortgage, lease or otherwise dispose of such dwelling unit to structure to another until the provisions of the compliance order or notice of violation have been complied with, or until such owner shall first furnish the grantee, transferee, mortgage or lessee, acknowledging the receipt of such compliance order or notice of violation and fully accepting the responsibility without condition for making the corrections or repairs required by such compliance order or notice of violation." On January 25, 2021, the structure was posted as an unsafe structure. The foundation and building support systems appear to have failed. The apparent structural failures are based solely on my observations and would need to be reviewed by a licensed engineer to identify the failures. There are two options available to owner, repair the structure or remove the structure. If repairing the structure and prior to habitation, we will require: 1. A structural analysis be completed by a licensed engineer 2. A permit application and plans reviewed, approved and issued by the City 3. Work that ensures structural safety, life safety, and sanitation completed 4. Mechanical systems inspected and approved for use 5. Plumbing systems inspected and approved for use 6. Electrical systems inspected and approved for use If removing the structure, no work may commence until application is made with the City and applicable permits have been issued. As the owner, you need to provide a written plan, delivered to the City by 2:00 pm on February 5, 2021, indicating the repair or removal actions that will be taken to address all violation's, along with a timeline to complete all work. Failure to do so will result in the matter being brought before the City Council with a recommendation that the building be abated under MN Statute 463.15 — 26, which states that all unsafe buildings, structures, or appendages are public nuisances and must be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition, or removal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, { Tracy Reimann, Code Enforcement Encl. Cc: Municipal Property File _ �y . IN �'ebruary 16, 2021 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL WITH RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, REGULAR U.S. MAIL AND POSTED ON -SITE Mr. Gary A. Field Mr, Gary A. Field The Residence at North Ridge 3053 Brighton Blvd. and 5500 Boone Ave. N. #418 Mound, MN 55364 New Hope, MN 55428 "NUINTIM. R NO WIN Dear Mr. Field: This letter is|nregards to the structure located at3053 BrightonBoWlsvard, Mound. On January 25,2021, this structure was posted asahazardous structure and donot occupy, Property Declaration dated January 25,JO21enclosed) Per Minnesota Statutes, section 463.15 Subd. 3 a "Hazardous building or hazardous property" means any building or property, which because of inadequate maintenance, 6Uookdodon, physical doonoOe, sanitary condition, or abandonment, constitutes afire hazard or a hazard to public safety or health. " The Certif icate of Occupancy for this structure is hereby revoked per MN Rules, Chapter 1300.0220 Subpart 7. IVIN Rules, Chapter 1300.0180 provides that "o8unsofe buildings, structures, or appendages are public nuisances and must be abated bvrepair, rehabilitation, cen?o8Uoq n,removal according to Minnesota Statutes, sections \nthe January 25 2O2lletter the City requested a written plan, delivered tothe City 6vFriday, February 5,2O21 indicating the repair or removal actions that will be taken to address all violation'$, along with a timeline to complete all work. Ayofthis date noresponse has been received bythe City. Therefore, at the Tuesday, March 9, 2021 City Council meeting, the City will be seeking formal direction from the City Council regarding the abatement of 3053 Brighton Boulevard. You are hereby advised that we will be recommending to City Council to proceed with hazardous building action to remove the structure. State law allows the City to assess its costs to the property. This date may be subject to change. Please feel free to contact me Ifyou have any questions regarding this letter mfeel you have received this letter in error. / can bereached at952442-7S20 Sincerely, Tracy Relmann Building Official Limited Attachment February1 i CERTIFIED MAIL WITH RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, REGULAR U.S. MAILAND POit Mr. Gary A. Mr. Gary A. Field The Residence. .• 3053 Brighton. . 5500 :..ne Ave.t Hope,Mound, MN 55364 New i This letter is in regards to the structure located at 3053 Brighton Blvd., Mound. This structure has been declared unsafe to enter and therefore a hazardous property. In the letter dated February 16, 2021, you were advised that the City will be seeking formal direction from the City Council regarding the abatement of 3053 Brighton Blvd. The matter was originally to be included on the Tuesday, March 9, 2021 City Council meeting agenda. Please be advised that the date has been changed and will now be included on the Tuesday, March 23, 2021 City Council meeting agenda. I have enclosed a copy of the letter dated February 16, 2021. Please feel free to contact me If you have any questions regarding this letter or feel you have received this letter In error. I can be reached at 952-442-7520. Sincerely, Tracy Reimann Building Official Limited Encl. Cc: Municipal Property File ffA7 I V 4W 0 i c ik 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 11/19/2020 11/19/2020 11/19/2020 11/19/2020 11/19/2020 %ii 11/19/2020 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952)472-0604 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: March 18, 2021 Re: Discussion/Action — Resolution Approving Restoration Agreement for 2396 Commerce Boulevard Summary. As an alternative to an abatement action for the property at 2396 Commerce Boulevard, as discussed at the January 26, 2021 City Council meeting, City and owner representatives have been in discussions regarding the preparation of a restoration agreement for repair of the building to allow for future reuse and occupancy. The draft resolution, which was prepared by the City Attorney, approves a restoration agreement with the owner of the property. Members are advised that the restorative agreement is under review by the legal representative of the owner, James Lang, and includes language that authorizes the City Attorney, the City Manager and the Mayor to make modifications to the proposed agreement consistent with its intent in order to reach final agreement with the property owner. Requested Action. Staff recommends approval of the draft resolution. Attachment. • Draft restoration agreement _r� CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING RESTORATION AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE HAZARDOUS PROPERTY EXISTING AT 2396 COMMERCE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the property located at 2396 Commerce Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota, legally described as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Subject Property"), contains a single commercial building; WHEREAS, according to the Hennepin County Property Information website, the Subject Property is owned by the Annabelle Williams Trust and the taxpayer is James Lang ("Owner"); WHEREAS, the Subject Property has been vacant and unmaintained for a number of years; WHEREAS, on August 13, 2020, at the bi-weekly Mound/MnSpect staff meeting, concerns were discussed regarding the Subject Property and MnSpect was requested to contact the Owner to coordinate a meeting at the Subject Property; WHEREAS, on August 24, 2020, a letter was sent to Keith Reitman, the taxpayer of record as of that date, citing International Property Maintenance Code violations and requesting entry to the building on the Subject Property. The deadline included in the letter for a response was August 28, 2020; WHEREAS, on August 25, 2020, MnSpect received an email from the City with photos documenting that a portion of the building fayade on the Subject Property had fallen off the front of the building onto the sidewalk. The City's Public Works Department cleaned up the material from the sidewalk; WHEREAS, on August 27, 2020, Tracy Reimann of MnSpect conducted a site inspection of the building on the Subject Property regarding a partially collapsed wall. Upon arriving, Mr. Reimann observed that the masonry veneer on the southwest, front corner of the structure was not intact and the masonry veneer appeared to have separated from the supporting wall framing. Also, there appeared to be evidence of water damage to the wall cavity, which may have caused the failure; WHEREAS, on September 1, 2020, MnSpect received a report of construction work being completed on the front of the building on the Subject Property without a permit. Mr. Reimann conducted a site inspection on September 2, 2020 and found that concrete was used to partially fill the missing masonry cavity; WHEREAS, on September 8, 2020, an additional letter was sent to Keith Reitman, the taxpayer of record as of that date, requesting a site inspection to determine if there are any safety concerns with the structure and to discuss property maintenance violations. The deadline included in the letter for MnSpect to inspect property was September 18, 2020; WHEREAS, on September 9, 2020, MnSpect received a request to email the previous two letters to the Owner. The Owner made himself known to be the owner of the Subject Property. MnSpect complied with this request on September 9, 2020; WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, MnSpect received a telephone call from Michael Mahoney, identifying himself as the attorney for the Owner. Mr. Mahoney informed Mr. Reimann that a structural report and contractors' evaluation would be received within 7 to 10 days; WHEREAS, on October 20, 2020, Scott Qualle from MnSpect recommended that City proceed with an Administrative Search Warrant to gain access to the building; WHEREAS, on November 5, 2020, MnSpect received the structural assessment of the Subject Property from Mr. Mahoney; WHEREAS, on November 13, 2020, the City applied for and obtained an Administrative Search Warrant for the Subject Property, which was executed by Scott Qualle from MnSpect on November 25, 2020; WHEREAS, on December 6, 2020, Scott Qualle submitted a letter to the City, citing his observations during the November 25, 2020 inspection. Due to lack of maintenance, illegal modifications and water intrusion, he concluded that he believed the building on the Subject Property is hazardous and should be removed by demolition; WHEREAS, on December 10, 2020, the City sent Mr. Lang a letter deeming the structure unsafe and hazardous as defined by Minnesota Statute 463.15, subd. 3. In addition, Mr. Lang was advised that the City would be proceeding with the preparation of the required documents to authorize proceeding with an order to abate the hazardous building conditions. Mr. Lang was also advised that the City would entertain preparation of a Removal Agreement no later than January 15, 2021. A copy of the Inspection Report dated December 6, 2020 was also provided to Mr. Lang and also to Mr. Lang's attorney; WHEREAS, on January 26, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-17, a "Resolution to Authorize Proceeding with Hazardous Building Action for Property at 2396 Commerce Boulevard," which authorized the City Attorney and Building Official to proceed with the preparation of all required documents to formerly commence a hazardous building action for abatement of conditions on the Subject Property, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, sections 463.15 to 463.26; WHEREAS, the Owner seeks to rehabilitate the Subject Property, and the City Attorney, City Staff and Mr. Mahoney have worked together to prepare a Restoration Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit B that would allow the Owner to rehabilitate the Subject Property; and _re c WHEREAS, the City consents to the rehabilitation of the Subject Property without pursuing court action on this matter subject to the terms of the Restoration Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Restoration Agreement is approved, subject to the approval and execution of the Restoration Agreement by the Owner. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to work with the City Attorney to make any changes or amendments to the Restoration Agreement as the Mayor and the City Manager may deem necessary. 3. The Mayer and City Manager are authorized to execute the Restoration Agreement upon the approval and execution of the Restoration Agreement by the Owner. 4. The City Attorney and City staff are authorized to take all necessary legal steps to secure compliance with the Restoration Agreement. 5. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute a release of the Restoration Agreement at the request of the City Attorney and City staff under the terms outlined in the Restoration Agreement providing for such a release. 6. The City Attorney and City staff are authorized to carry out the intent of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council this 23`d day of March, 2021. ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Raymond J. Salazar, Mayor -. I EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Subject Property Lot 14, McNaught's Addition to Mound Lake, Minnetonka <lml> EXHIBIT B Restoration Agreement (attached hereto) Gym RESTORATION AGREEMENT This Restoration Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of this day of , 2021, by and between the city of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and James Lang, a single person ("Lang"). The City and the Lang shall be referred to collectively herein as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, Lang is an owner of certain real property located at 2396 Commerce Boulevard in the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Property contains a single commercial building, with the exterior of the building facing Commerce Boulevard and the sides of the building lying on the applicable property lines with no setback (the `Building"); WHEREAS, on November 25, 2020, pursuant to an administrative search warrant, a physical inspection of the Property and the Building's exterior and interior was conducted by the City's Building Official. The City's Building Official prepared a report dated December 6, 2020, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, which includes, but is not limited to, the following allegations: (1) water intrusion causing damage and deterioration of exterior framing and structural integrity, (2) failing joints and failures in Building additions, (3) unsound flooring and collapsing walls in a Building addition, (4) water damage to the front door, (5) visible light in the interior of the Building due to structural failures at wall/roof intersections, (6) evidence of water intrusion and failures in roof structures, ceilings and floors, (7) possible asbestos -containing materials, (8) holes in structural basement walls, presumably roughly created for doorways, (9) soil removal in the crawlspace that compromises the stability of walls and floors, (10) temporary and non -stable structural supports, (11) failed heat plant, (12) foundation failure in one corner of the Building with dirt eroding through the damaged block wall, (13) failing roof conditions in numerous locations causing water infiltration and damage, (14) significant trash and debris in the rear of the Property, (15) significant failures, including a foundation that has moved several inches and failed, in the final addition to the Eim Building, (16) the chimney is not sealed, allowing water intrusion and (17) the presence of dangerous power lines above the Building and unprotected electrical wires; WHEREAS, based on the conditions discovered during the aforementioned inspection, the City Building Official has determined that (1) the Building and Property are "hazardous," as defined by Minnesota Statutes, section 463.15, and (2) both the exterior and interior portions of the Property are in violation of numerous provisions of the Mound City Code (the "City Code"); WHEREAS, the City contends that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 463, the City is authorized to initiate formal legal proceedings to require that Lang abate the Property's hazardous and unsafe conditions and, in the event that Lang fails to do so, the City is further provided with the statutory authority to facilitate said abatement on its own and assess the Property for the cost thereof; WHEREAS, Lang disputes the City's contentions regarding the Property and allegations the Building is structurally sound, the allegation by the City Building Official may be repaired and a decision to demolish the Building is unwarranted: WHEREAS, the City has stated it desires to avoid demolition of the Building, Lang desires to establish a framework to repair the building without admitting or denying the City's contentions: WHEREAS, Lang, with the assistance of a City resident and neighboring property owner, has retained and engaged a professional engineer and construction company to perform inspections, make recommendations and issue reports that establish that the Building and the Property can be abated and the Building can be improved in a manner that will meet the City's zoning and building regulations and any and all other applicable City regulations, as set forth in the City's Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Parties have jointly prepared the construction and improvement schedule set forth in this Agreement, and by entering into this Agreement, the Parties wish to jointly facilitate the abatement and improvement of the Property's and Building's alleged hazardous conditions set forth above and avoid legal proceedings; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Recitals. The Parties agree that the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated into this Agreement. 2. Performance. So long as Lang complies with the terms of paragraph 3 of this Agreement, the City agrees that it will not issue an order for abatement as authorized in - Minnesota Statutes, chapter 463 and that it will not initiate formal legal proceedings in civil court. If Lang fails to comply with the terms of paragraph 3 of this Agreement and is determined to be in default as set forth in this Agreement, then he agrees that the City may immediately perform any outstanding work specified in this Agreement and assess its costs as set forth in paragraph 7 of this Agreement. Lang also agrees that the City may opt to remove the Building instead of performing the outstanding work if it is deemed by the City to be more cost-effective to do so. 3. Abatement and Improvement of the Building. a. Removal of Trash and Debris. Lang, at his own cost and expense, agrees to remove all debris and trash from the Property on or before March 15, 2021. Lang authorizes the City to inspect the Property on or before March 1, 2021 to ensure that the debris and trash has been removed from the Property. b. Plans. On or before April 30, 2021, Lang shall submit architectural plans for the Building's repair ("Improvements"). The plans will be prepared by a registered architect who will become the architect of record for the project. The plans will become Exhibit C of this Agreement upon approval of building permits as set forth below. The City agrees to cooperate with Lang and to use its best efforts to timely approve the permits required. Delay in the City's approval process shall result in deferral of the events set forth below by the days of delay and shall constitute extension of required completion and not result in a default under this Agreement. C. Planning and Zoning. On or before May 30, 2021, Lang shall submit all zoning requests required in support of the Improvements. This Agreement is neither a substitute nor a waiver of the City's planning and zoning application and review process and Lang will be solely responsible for obtaining necessary planning and zoning approvals required for the proposed uses and Improvements. The City agrees to cooperate with Lang and to use its best efforts to timely approve the permits required. Delay in the City's approval process shall result in deferral of the events set forth below by the days of delay and shall constitute extension of required completion and not result in a default under this Agreement. d. Repair and Improvements. On or before June 30, 2021, Lang shall obtain a building permit to complete construction of the Improvements. Lang shall substantially complete all work for the Improvements and obtain a certificate of occupancy on or before December 31, 2021. The City agrees to cooperate with Lang and to use its best efforts to timely approve the permits required. Delay in the City's approval process shall result in deferral of the events set forth below by the days of delay and shall constitute extension of required completion and not result in a default under this Agreement. e. Permits, Approval and Inspections. This Agreement is neither a substitute for nor a waiver of the City's permitting and inspection requirements. Lang or his Ma- contractor(s) will obtain all necessary permits for the work on the Property. To obtain a building permit, Lang will need updated plans for the Improvements that meet current City Code. If Lang meets the conditions to obtain a permit, the City will not withhold or otherwise interfere with the Lang's ability to obtain a building permit. All plumbing permits will require a state plumbing licensed contractor. All electrical permits will require a state licensed electrical contractor. All mechanical permits will require a city licensed mechanical contractor. Any and all alterations of the property will comply with City Code requirements. Lang will allow the City access to all areas of the Property for the inspections. The City agrees to cooperate with Lang and to use its best efforts to timely approve the permits required. Delay in the City's approval process shall result in deferral of the events set forth below by the days of delay and shall constitute extension of required completion and not result in a default under this Agreement. 4. Default. The following events shall constitute an event of default by Lang: a. Failure by Lang to timely perform the work set forth in section 3(a)-(d) above, subject to unavoidable delays beyond Lang's control, including, but not limited to, delays in material and equipment deliveries, labor or equipment shortages, and weather conditions that interfere with completion, within 30 days after receipt by Lang of notice thereof by the City, or such longer period of time as may reasonably be required to cure such default provided Lang is proceeding with diligence to do so. b. Failure by Lang to obtain a certificate of occupancy for the Property on or before December 31, 2021. 5. Remedies on Default. In the event of default which is not excused or timely cured the City may take any one or more of the following actions: a. The City may suspend its performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances from Lang, deemed adequate by the City, that Lang will cure his default and continue his performance under the Agreement. b. The City may initiate such action, including legal or administrative action, whether in law or in equity, as is necessary for the City to perform the work for the Improvements or recover any amounts due under this Agreement from Lang, or recover any damages sustained by the City as a result of Lang's default. C. This Agreement is a license by Lang for the City to enter the Property and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes. If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, exercise any authority available to it to recover its costs by a levy of special assessments against the Property to be paid over a period of ten (10) years. EiN 6. No Occupancy. Lang agrees that no new certificate of occupancy has been issued for the Property as of the date of this Agreement. Lang will not allow any other people to occupy the Building on the Property without a certificate of occupancy being issued. Until a new certificate of occupancy has been issued for the Property, Lang may continue to use the Property as he has in the past ten years provided Lang shall not conduct retails sales to the general public from the Property or personally use the Property as his residence. 7. Special Assessment of Costs and Expenses; Waiver. The City is authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 463.21 and 463.22 to assess the expenses that it incurs as a result of its enforcement of the City issuing a legally valid Order in the event of default by Lang including specifically, but not exclusively, demolition or repair costs, disposal costs including costs to remove items from the Property, other costs to remove the hazardous conditions on the Property, filing fees, service fees, publication fees, reasonable attorneys' fees, witness fees and traveling expenses (the "Expenses"). In the event of default by Lang and if the City has to perform work as outlined in Paragraph 3(a)-(d) of this Agreement, then Lang, for himself and his successors and assigns, hereby waives the right to object to the City's assessment of 100 percent (100%) of the Expenses incurred by the City. Lang hereby further waives his right to appeal the levy of the special assessment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081, or reapportionment thereof upon land division pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.071, subdivision 3; and further specifically agrees with respect to such special assessment against the Property that: a. Any requirements of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, with which the City does not comply are hereby waived by Lang with respect to the City's Expenses; b. The increase in fair market value of the Property resulting from the work will be in an amount at least equal to the total cost for the work undertaken under Paragraph 3(a)-(d) and assessed to the Property, and that such increase in fair market value is a special benefit resulting from said work; C. Lang's waiver of his right to object to the City's assessment of 100 percent of the Expenses against the Property as outlined above so long as it is reasonable, fair and equitable and there are no other properties against which the Expenses should be assessed; and d. Such special assessment shall be payable in up to ten (10) annual installments starting in the year 2022, with interest at the annual rate of four percent (4%) accruing from the date of the assessment hearing. 8. Waiver of Claims. If the City has to perform work as outlined in Paragraph 3(a)-(d) of this Agreement, Lang agrees to waive any claims against the City, its officials, employees, contractors, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims, actions, or judgments, including reasonable attorneys' fees which they, or their agents or contractors may hereinafter sustain, incur, or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of this Agreement, except for personal injury, gross negligence, intentional behavior, and or actions arising from wanton disregard for the property or personal rights of Lang. Nothing in this MW Agreement shall be construed as a waiver by the City of any immunities, defenses, or other limitations on liability to which the City is entitled by law, including but not limited to the maximum monetary limits on liability established by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 or otherwise. Should the City, complete any of the work as outlined in Paragraph 3(a)-(d) of this Agreement, the Lang waives any and all claims against the City for the removal or destruction of any and all personal items, provided, however that Lang shall receive advance written notice at least 10 days before any removal and be allowed to enter and remove such property. As part of this waiver, Lang knowingly acknowledges and agrees that none of the items that remain on the Property, after the agreed -upon removal date, need to be salvaged or sold, and, accordingly, the City may dispose of said items and need not make any attempt to salvage or sell said items. The City may not keep any said items, nor give them to any of its employees or agents. 9. Hazardous Building Action. By entering into this Agreement, the City agrees that it will not issue an order for abatement or initiate legal proceedings in court against Lang regarding the Property and Building's allegedly hazardous condition, unless the there is an event of default not cured as provided herein. 10. General Provisions. This Agreement, including the recitals, exhibits attached hereto, and the documents incorporated herein by reference, contains the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes in all respects all prior agreements of the Parties, whether written or otherwise, with respect to the Property and the Building. No change, modification or waiver of any provisions of this Agreement will be binding unless it is in writing and signed by both Parties. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the state of Minnesota. 11. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in multiple counterparts, each of which, when so delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument and agreement. 12. Run with the Land. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with the land and be binding upon the Parties and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns. 13. Recording. The City may record this Agreement against the Property in the land records of Hennepin County. It is the intent of the Parties that this Agreement is in a form which is recordable among the land records and the Parties agree to make any changes to this Agreement as may be necessary to effectuate the recording and filing of this Agreement against the Property. 14. Severability. If any term, provision, or condition contained in this Agreement shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement (or the application of such term, provision, or condition to persons or circumstances other than those in respect to which it is invalid or unenforceable) shall not be affected, and each term, provision, or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Mi". 15. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In performing all obligations contained herein, the Parties must abide by all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations. 16. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate upon the earlier date of either (a) Lang's satisfactory completion of the work set forth in paragraph 3, or (b) upon certification of the assessment of all costs associated with any work completed by the City if Lang fails to perform the work set forth in paragraph 5. Upon termination of this Agreement based on (a) of this Paragraph, the City shall thereafter execute and deliver such documents, in recordable form, that are necessary to extinguish the rights hereunder. Upon termination of this Agreement based on (b) of this Paragraph, the City shall have the ability to pursue all available legal remedies with respect to the hazardous conditions on the Property including but not limited to seeking a court order to demolish the dwelling. 17. Attornev Representation. The Parties acknowledge that they have been represented by counsel in connection with the execution of this Agreement and intend that no rules construing provisions of this Agreement against the position of the drafter shall be applied. The Parties further represent and declare that in executing this document they have relied solely upon their own judgment, belief and knowledge, or the advice and recommendation of their own independently selected counsel, and that they have not been influenced to any extent whatsoever in executing this document by any representations or statements except those expressly contained or referred to in this Agreement. [SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf on or as of the dates indicated herein. THE CITY: Raymond J. Salazar, Mayor Eric Hoversten, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 12021, by Raymond J. Salazar and Eric Hoversten, the mayor and city manager, respectively, of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city. Notary Public % -6 LANG: James Lang STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 12021, by James Lang, a single person. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Lot 14, McNaught's Addition to Mound Lake, Minnetonka EXHIBIT B Building Official Administrative Search Warrant Report (attached hereto) EXHIBIT C Architectural Plans (attached hereto) CITY OF MOUND — CITY MANAGER 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound, MN 55364 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Eric Hoversten, City Manager and Director of Public Works DATE: March 15, 2021 SUBJECT: Lost Lake Improvement Initiative Update Initiative Introductory Letter to Dept of Natural Resources LOCATION: Lost Lake, Mound MN REQUEST: Council approve release of the attached Lost Lake Improvement Initiative Introductory Memo to MN Dept of Natural Resources (DNR) requesting agency support with preliminary stakeholder -agency identification and future project alternative identification, analysis, and selection discussions. BACKGROUND: The City of Mound and community stake holders have been engaged for several years in high level or broad stroke conversations on options and opportunities to improve the function and value of Lost Lake and surrounding natural resources in our community. The City desires to continue developing strategies to achieve improvement objectives and include the broader group of stakeholders in the initial development, analysis, and selection of project alternatives to secure project success. The high-level objective in this discussion includes improving economic vitality, ecology, public education, and boater safety within the Lost Lake and surrounding environments through improvement and enhancement of the natural resources and features of the land. - Create a water friendly downtown experience for the City of Mound - Create joint effort projects with the Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the City of Mound to improve the quality of Lost Lake and Lake Langdon's natural resources enhancing their livability for the community. - Improve boater safety in the Lost Lake corridor - Create community engagement and public education opportunities throughout the natural resource area 1 765 The health of Lake Langdon and Lost Lake needs to be brought to the forefront of our community's planning for a sustainable future; the healthier they are the healthier our community is. At its October 27, 2020 Regular Meeting, Mayor Salazar provided initial details regarding discussions between the Development Committee of the Council and MN DNR on this subject. The initial project concepts and preferred outcomes identified by the City met resistance during these initial discussions causing the city representatives to regroup on how to best proceed with mapping project activities to achieve City goals. The Development Committee has taken a step back to refine the overall outcome objectives as guiding resources for future conversations with key other -agency stakeholders. By bringing these critical players into the ground floor of project alternative identification, evaluation, and selection — we gain buy -in from key coordination and approval authorities from the onset. This assures supportable, collaborative solutions from the beginning and avoids the us -versus -them battles to force specific elements through approvals. Many project details have yet to be determined, and many — if not most — of the project challenges are yet unknown. By starting with high-level objectives, and inviting key stakeholders to the conversation early these issues can be identified and resolved as collaborating agency -partners as they emerge. As with any great accomplishment; the challenges faced on the road to success are usually weathered over time, but the accomplishment itself stands as a daily reminder to the community as a testament to communities bettering their world. The attached memo introduces our high-level objectives and invites DNR participation on two fronts: early identification of key stakeholders to join future conversations; and participation in future stakeholder group discussions on project possibilities. RECOMMENDATION: Council approve release of the attached Lost Lake Improvement Initiative Introductory Memo to the MN DNR. 2 766 March 23, 2021 John (Jack) Gleason South District Hydrologist Supervisor, Central Region, Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Rd St. Paul, MN 55106 RE: Lost Lake Improvement Initiative Introductory Memo The City of Mound and community stake holders have been engaged in high level or broad stroke conversations for several years on how to accomplish the high-level objectives stated below. Understanding there are many variables; several previously - discussed options are summarized below to provide perspective on earlier thought -work and guide future conversations. The City desires to continue developing strategies to achieve these objectives and include the broader group of stakeholders in the initial development, analysis, and selection of project alternatives to secure project success. Obiectives: Improve economic vitality, ecology, public education, and boater safety within the Lost Lake and surrounding environments through improvement and enhancement of the natural resources and features of the land. - Create a water friendly downtown experience for the City of Mound - Create joint effort projects with the Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the City of Mound to improve the quality of Lost Lake and Lake Langdon's natural resources enhancing their livability for the community. - Improve boater safety in the Lost Lake corridor - Create community engagement and public education opportunities throughout the natural resource area We feel the health of Lake Langdon and Lost Lake needs to be brought to the forefront of our community's planning for a sustainable future; the healthier they are the healthier our community is. Option Summary: Option one represents the most desirable outcome, but it also carries the greatest number of challenges. This option is a navigable waterway tying into the northerly end of the existing Lost Lake Channel that follows the westerly bank in a southerly direction ultimately turning due east and returning to the existing channel near the Bartlett Blvd. bridge. Following the waterway would be a boardwalk with stopping stations that provide posted information on the habitat and wildlife of the Lost Lake area Option two does not distance itself too far from option one in the challenges it poses, but provides a less desirable result. Option two mimics the previous in navigable improvements, but the route would not follow the angle of the westerly shore line but rather it would be a more direct route headed in a southerly direction running west of and parallel to the existing waterway. Once reaching a reasonable proximity to the Bartlett Blvd Bridge it would rejoin the existing channel. Option three seems to have the fewest challenges and appears to be the least costly. Option three is a widening of the existing channel to the west of the existing channel by a distance equal to the width of the existing channel. Additionally, board walk would run in a north/south direction on the west side of the channel displaying stations as mentioned in above options. In all options, creating a boardwalk through the wetland and alongside the waterway seems desirable as a method to bring the community to the experience and witness the wetland. Creating additional transient boat parking would be a favorable accomplishment as well. As with any great accomplishment; the challenges faced on the road to success are usually weathered over time, but the accomplishment itself stands as a daily reminder to the community as a testament to communities bettering their world. Considerations: The challenges of such an undertaking are not lost on us. We understand many of the obstacles and wish to partner with the organizations with oversight. Recognized challenges include, but are not limited to: Environmental study: Completion of appropriate environmental assessments is accepted as a part of the requirements. Wetland Credits 2 for 1: The wetland credit program is expected to play into this project no matter how it unfolds, and we are willing to face those challenges and find a path to accomplishing. Costs: It has been accepted that this will not be an inexpensive venture and will flirt with a couple million dollars. We have discussed with some local legislative representation and have support in finding financial assistance when the time is appropriate. Private property: There are sections of privately held properties along the westerly bank of the site, we identify this as a possible challenge and have a few ideas on how to address. Riparian rights: Our goal in the addition of a navigable waterway in Lost Lake is not to grant riparian rights to landowners. We would address this by specifically structuring the projects to negate those privileges. Partnerships: In the forefront is the fact that a project like this cannot be undertaken and accomplished alone. We are looking to partner in whatever manner is required. Partnering to accomplish water treatment to adjacent or local sites to help improve the areas hydrology over all is something we have identified as willing to work with and be a part of a greater process if required. The above is a very high-level summary of the long-range goal. We recognize that much more work; and greater detail will need to be developed in order to identify and address all the challenges. This memo initiates the City request for DNR assistance with identifying the primary stakeholder group and formulating achievable strategies to meet the stated objectives. Our mid-term goal would be to identify all partners and stakeholders and begin discussing possible projects in the surrounding the area to create the outline of a plan of attack. Our immediate ask is for the DNR to meet initially with the Development Committee of the Mound City Council to brainstorm and map out this process. Your support and expertise are valued and appreciated. Scheduling can be orchestrated with City Manager Eric Hoversten (952) 472-0609 Thank you. City Council, The City of Mound Raymond J Salazar Mayor, City of Mound -E c 14 L LL F- z 2 O a W r� r_ V F- z W m H a w W LL z O N O N 0 >= w L-Ln� co LM� r �0 0 W r Or r r O wrn N� O� Ln O O �� N O co T ❑ N M U N r W r r r O 0 O M 0 O M LO N O co 0 N N �+ N O 0 r T(D 00 0 o r O M O N 0 O N O r 0 co C4 N M r r LO Uj T E N m r N 0 0 0 r O Lf) 0 O M O O r c r 0 00 O�� U 12 r-� L() 1N O r fl 0 0 0 O r CO ao r 0 O O a0 a)D LO r a }0 = N U-)r M M 00 r Co T N r M I- 0 0 0 0 I.[) 0 O M O O N U r 0 Co UM N N �+ L ) M r r N M- 0 0 0 0 LO I O LO O O It N r O ti r r CM LO co LL N �I��rNLnOOOO�00ONO O �C14 5 0 E U m CL a) c(Di a) a) 0 (1) a) Q +V O ` V m J ~ `) 0 O � 0 p � p � L)) O � L) � LLI � v rO 'C H — LL a) E (D uvi E () LL a) 2�1 LL a) ( E (D O Umw> 0 0 o cnF- m ❑ N p Y p U ❑ la— U O Of d Q m Q =0 () Z z H Q z 00 d p U U) U Q �a 0 Lo— M N M M 04 N M O N M U W Q z w a ,_ c O 0 N QY ) 0 } O m0 Q g U) >' W W— p(JI� W aQ�¢w¢ � w w z O w Q >,wwOfUga C 2pw>~cwn 2 0 2 W 3 J O O UWO(nJa W I— W w Q r CY) (D O N O N al+ M O CDM M LO r r Cl) N r I- N 0 N Z G O N LN a U) J p J_ W > W U) W z OO Z Of U 2 J J J_ d Q U a' Z" U p ❑ 0 00 0 Q Q J z a ¢?z F- LL �000LO(Mr`r LL O (D T N r N r T r 2 E N O 2 oO a)�m ° � Z a N LL LV O W Q cn n `Y �° o w c c N _N �- o o J Z m O C >, V a W o a) 0 0 w 0� L cu CO U) 0) c `O Z O Q N N N O O N H L) LL LL LL (D LL LL a U) E E E E E cn ww QQQ QQ N c0 2 w � V N 0 N 0 N N N LL LL LL LL LL LL LT- LL NW Li. N V 2 a LL. m m m U J m U 0 w L Ln L rn L rn (1) E L �_ 0) :E 0) E p o m cu o aLomc U X� X X U V d N 'DNx LO O N N ~ C C C C C C C O O O O O O O w _ N _ N _ N T N T N r N T N Q O N CD N O N O N O N O N O N 0 LO LO m 00 .. N N N N r N N T N N N N W ti T LO In (O � M LL Z co It It CD (0 (.0 � Ln W c7 a0 00 O 00 N co 00 � 00 r T N T T T N N N T T r NN 7 U =cn a O O ° cu o N N° N N 01 C � d w O C .> a O CL O a O) � ° CL a= a= ° o a� wo O C C C (0 c (0 c N 3 c W rn c Cl D �°�°�°CO Z Z Z y i� — Tu c N U c U C N O Z N U U co cn U cn U U co U U U co co W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0) 0 0) 0 0 0) 0 0) 0 0) 0 0 0) 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U 7 U M N(n 0) 0) to 0) u) 0) N 0) N 0) cn 0) cn 0) u) 0 N 0) cn 0 w 0) N r Nw W is O � m '" N 0) �- v d .> 0 o m ca m CU o >j an J 0) 0 o co 3 0) N L -a 0) O 0) 0) O .- -0 c E N c 3 o a o E o 3 E co T U) 0) c = N c=U=_j c c c� CE CoU W (`) N N � a N qt (O r M N LO "a C "a C "a C -0-0 C C -0 C "O C "O C a C -D C "a C "o C "a C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N O CDCD N CD N CS N CS N CS N O N O N CS N (D N CD N N —Lo � T (O T ti r O r O N O N O N rICT N N q N 00 N N N N N N N N N N N N O N d co LO CD (O (4 00 O cm O ti r N In ti (D 1 00 (moo v Q2 E 00 c � 00 O U a) 0) 0 Y O E U) E cu El N LL C 7 O 2 N O N N N M PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES February 11, 2021 The Mound Parks and Open Spaces Commission met on Thursday, February 11, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers of the Centennial Building. Present: Commissioners Linda Cordie, Mark Stehlik, and Joanna Kahn, Chair Travis Mills, Council Representative Sherrie Pugh Absent: None Others Present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten Public Present: Tyler Pieper, 5504 Church Rd 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Mills at 7:00 p.m. 2. Approval of Agenda Motion by Stehlik, Second by Cordie; Motion carried 5-0 3. Roll Call All present 4. Approve January 14, 2021 Parks and Open Spaces Commission Minutes Motion by Cordie, Second by Stehlik; Motion carried 5-0 S. Comments and Suggestions From Citizens Present None presented 6. Tvler Pieper reauestine discussion of native plant oronaeation within narks. Mr Pieper introduced himself and his concept for increasing the use of native and pollinator plantings in our park system. He referenced several regional consultancies as the source for his general concept. He identified Belmont Park as the park in his neighborhood where there may be a location for a demonstration -type project. Pieper identified the need for maintenance of existing sites already within the inventory but expressed a desire to also expand this usage within the system. Mills indicated that there are a number of opportunities to fit these into our existing park locations. Stehlik commented that maintenance and creation of these types of spaces are a good fit with the Adopt-a-greenspace program. Ms Pugh identified the complementary function of placemaking within these spaces and that the Belmont location would benefit from both the addition of both seating and aesthetic improvements. Pugh also identified the Lawns to Legumes funding steam from the State. Stehlik clarified that this was not available to Government Units, Hoversten Confirmed. Hoversten identified 2 potential grant programs, Great River Greening and past support gained from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; the former appearing more promising at the moment as MCWD has suspended their grant activities the past several fiscal years. Em Mills asked for clarification on what Pieper was willing to commit to. Pieper responded his willingness to volunteer time to work with existing locations as well as develop a small-scale demonstration for the Belmont location. MOTION made by Mills, seconded by Pugh, to instruct staff to continue discussion with Mr Pieper to refine a project concept, scope and cost, targeting the Belmont neighborhood. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7. Discus Adopt -a Greenspace program, information, and marketing materials Hoversten introduced the existing information found in the files on the Adopt-a-Greenspace program. He indicated that the materials were slightly dated and in data formats that were less flexible — but that they could be worked with and updated. He presented an updated inventory of locations that would be included in the program and identified the several downtown area garden boxes that have been removed and no longer exist. Mills identified the need to develop some form of signage that announces availability of unclaimed locations and acknowledges the volunteers that do participate. Hoversten indicated that he would explore options and costs to produce this type of engagement and provide to the commission for further consideration. Stehlik identified that in future years, the Commissioner might include following up with volunteers in their preparation for park condition evaluation visits each spring Pugh identified the need for the program to be set in motion in time for spring sign-up for those interested in the gardening functions within the program so work can coincide with plant material availability. Kahn concurred. Cordie volunteered to run through the current list of last know volunteers maintaining flower boxes to confirm participation and update those contacts. Mills identified 4 tasks that needed to be completed: Review materials for clarity and unification of tasks. Consider generic signage at parks, recognition in printed materials Contact past participants, review/renew/etc. Advertise by April 151' MOTION made by Mills, second by Stehlik to: Review materials for clarity and unification of tasks Consider generic signage at parks, recognition in printed materials Contact past participants, review/renew/etc. Advertise by April 151' All voted in favor. Motion carried 8. Discuss forthcoming Small -Area Improvement Plan process for Harbor District public spaces Hoversten introduced upcoming efforts by Council, Staff and City planning consultants to develop an improvement plan to coordinate intentional improvements to the spaces within Em the Harbor District to remain public with existing assets, and newly -proposed multi -family housing. He highlighted the basic process to gather input on community values within the space and potential amenities to consider hosting in the space as part of its Phase 1. Phase 2 is the analysis of that input, development of several concept sketches, and gathering feedback. Phase 3 is production of a final concept and projected costs. Total project duration is anticipated 6-9 months depending on timing for key coordination meetings. Hoversten identified the project would be led by the Mayor, CM Pugh of the Council, Staff and the Hoisington Keogler planning team. The kick off meeting would include Council reps. The Parks and Open Spaces commission will have review and comment opportunities in phase 2 and 3 with the Council having final approval of the plan in phase 3. No action taken bythe Commission 9. Updated graphic map for City web site Hoversten presented a recently updaed graphic showing a map of City park and public spaces with refreshed amenities table that is part of the new City web site. No Action taken by the Commission 10. Reports: Cordie acknowledged the significant improvements in the City Web Site with the recent upgrade. 11. Adjourn Motion by Cordie, Second by Pugh; Motion carried 5-0 Meeting adjourned at 8:37PM m